> 荃 灣 獨 裁 者 said:
> 會 唔 會 係 因 為 九 龍 站 可 以 轉 到 東 涌 線 但
> 中 港 碼 頭 唔 得 ？
Why need to via Tung Chung line MTR when the route
already passes through Tsuen Wan Line MTR at
Jordan and Yau Ma Tei?
Article 22: (Request 10)
N102 will be a disaster again, there has not been overnight bus serving the Eastern district for these years because the red-mini buses are just too quick and
they are very frequent (since it doesn't take long to fill up a 16 seater minbus in Mong Kok). I would not take N102 even if it is introduced.
> 永 遠 懷 念LV68@4 said:
> i think N968 must be operate first,
> i don't think that N102 will get profit
> if via Tong Shui Road.
> But N968 is different,if it via Tuen Mun Road,
> it can set up N968 + N260 octopus interchange
> to other Tuen Mun area.
> So I strongly object to operate N102,because that is
> useless,passengers can now take N8 to change
> N122 at King's Road is enough
> 怪 物 mbwhk.com said:
> That means it is ok if boardmates not to metion their information as a '內 部 文 件'?
> If it is the case, I'll just ignore this word in the
> future. Since this is the problem of only four Chinese
> --怪 物(at School)
> 暗 西~DL13 said:
> I am not here challenging you..but won't you agree
> that crew duty number and bus run number are the
> internal affair inside the company?
> Telling the departure time of a specific bus
> of coz do no problem. But I don't think bus
> company will be indded happy for bus fans telling
> any detail information about the crew duty of
> concerned route.
> Most important, I dont think bus fan need to
> stand for a long time without any information
> about crew duty.
> If you think I am challenging you and you need to
> leave the board, then sorry to say: I can't help