Government already done this for long time. For example, gasoline, ciagrette, wine and cosmatics etc...
> 若 是 全 面 開 徵,則 巴 士 車 費 實 會 不 能 幸 免
Agree! Because that's the meaning of consumption tax. No one can have excuse not to pay, even for public transport.
> 我 覺 得 要 開 徵 消 售 稅,會 大 大 影 響 旅 遊 業
Not really. Because visitors can get money refund on the goods they brought in HK. (of course each item's price must exceed the predetermined amount)
> 市 民 會 更 不 願 意 消 費
Not really also. In short run, may be this is true. But in medium run, citizen get used to this tax. On the other hand, government spending can increase a lot.
This helps to decrease unemployment rate and leads to the increase in confidence of consumption.
So we cannot just take into consideration of short run effect.
> 最 終 可 能 得 不 償 失
It depends! Because other factors will also affect the economic situation in HK. For example, exchange rate, interest rate, world's economy, government
> 有 點 離 題 了
p.s sorry cannot type Chinese now