19980428




Articles on 28th April, 1998.

Today's Articles: 39.


Articles' Numbers: (19980428_01-39)





Article 1:

Re: 城記671用得八達通o拉


R Lai (raymansc@asiaonline.net) at Mon Apr 27 16:33, 1998 said:


> FF1819 (rainbow@netteens.net) said:


> 今朝我返學時, 見到671o的車貼住八達通撈搞, 但我睇唔清楚


> 唔知有冇板友可以證實呢?


昨日有部好似是426行671,有八記logo在車頭,但入面用紙封機,


表示無得用.


Article 2:

Re: 7XX is back to the rt.85!


100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) at Mon Apr 27 20:08, 1998 said:


> 701,LV163 (kwyeung@school.net.hk) said:


> After CTB using the 9XX for rt.85 for a few week, The CTB look know about that 11m buses is not suitable for rt.85 so all the 9XX is ran away and the 7XX is back!!


>


> 701 (I'm back to the rt.85, too.)





Just curious, what is your reason to prefer those single door Dragons over dual doors Volvo Olympian?





100 Wong


Article 2: (Request 1)

> Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) said:


>


> He/She hasn't told us his/her personal preference arrr?


> How can you find that?


>


> --


> Gakei!





Does this thread has anything to do with Hong Kong buses?





If you've an opinion about the matter, please express it. Otherwise, please save the disk space for Hong Kong buses' discussion instead of picking people's assumption.





Personally, I'm indifference about which type of bus should be used. I'm curious about what other people think!





100 Wong


Article 2: (Request 2)

> 綠川光 (dldennis@chevalier.net) said:


>


>


> I think you do not know the unique situtation of the CTB route 85.


> Since the route 85 should be via 'A Kung Arm' (亞公岩), it is more suitable to use the 'shorter' double decker in this route. However, CTB tried the 11m double decker in this route in the few weeks ago. Today the 10.3m Dragons are used in this route again and this is the history of this thread. Although 'A Kung Arm' allows 11m double decker to pass through (or even 12m since this is the parts of the CMB trial test route), it is better to use a 'shorter' decker to operate through this region.


>


> 綠川光





Oh! I've been on 85 before and I know what you're talking about. (once I needed to go to Heng Fa Chuen and didn't want to use MTR as usual) I'm curious about the following though.





1)Does the passenger demand ever justify anything larger than a 10.4m bus? (it didn't seem so when I travelled on it last time, although I don't have much idea about what happens during peak hours)





2)What type of 12m was used by CMB for trial purposes? (somehow ML is in my mind, though I might be wrong)





Thank you very much for your constructive response.





100 Wong


Article 2: (Request 3)

> 100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) said:


> 1)Does the passenger demand ever justify anything larger than a 10.4m bus? (it didn't seem so when I travelled on it last time, although I don't have much idea about what happens during peak hours)





Yes. Since new estate in Siu Sai Wan had completed and the Siu Sai Wan population increases to about 80,000, it is a better choice to use a larger double decker.





> 2)What type of 12m was used by CMB for trial purposes? (somehow ML is in my mind, though I might be wrong)





I've seen ML and DL for drive test (the test after a bus repaired). Also, DM had been used while CMB had operated in this route.





> Thank you very much for your constructive response.





You're welcome.





綠川光


Article 2: (Request 4)

100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) said:


>


> Yes, I notice the growing population of Siu Sai Wan as well. I'm just curious, are there many passengers in Siu Sai Wan who needs to go to North Point? Would they choose 85 over 84M and MTR?


> Of course, for a 'Die Hard' (nope, I'm not Bruce Willis!) A/C bus fan like me, I would take 85 anytime. >





They are different from you. They will take Rt.82.


Article 2: (Request 5)

You are halfly correct!At day time,the terminates of 82 is at Sheung On Street,but the route is via Siu Sai Wan in both direction,after 20:00,the terminates of 82 is Siu Sai Wan.Also the fare of 82 is relatively cheaper than 85,so many people (especially the elder)will take 82 rather than 85.





A Siu Sai Wan resident


SIA A340-300E


9V-SJD(CELESTAR)


Article 2: (Request 6)

> cky (kyfchiu@netvigator.com) said:


>


> In daytime, the eastern terminal of 82 is near the CMB bus


> depot, that is Sheund on street.)


> After 8:00pm, the terminate extended to the Siu Sai


> Wan. (That's why after 7:15p, the bus departure from NP


> will make the destination as Siu Sai Wan).


>


> cky





Any reason why there are two different terminuses for route 82 for daytime and nighttime? Free space at Siu Sai Wan from 788?





Any other route with different terminuses between daytime and nighttime?





100 Wong


Article 2: (Request 7)

CTB rt.5.


Before 0900: Central Street.


After 0900: Kennedy Town.


Article 2: (Request 8)

> 100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) said:


> Does this thread has anything to do with Hong Kong buses?


> If you've an opinion about the matter, please express it. Otherwise, please save the disk space for Hong Kong buses' discussion instead of picking people's assumption.


> Personally, I'm indifference about which type of bus should be used. I'm curious about what other people think!





Who starts picking others assumption?





Please note that complaining other boardmates without


appropriate reason behind will be punished.





--


Gakei!


Article 3:

Re: 汀九橋新消息


eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) at Mon Apr 27 19:29, 1998 said:


水魚 (jimes@netvigator.com) said:


> http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/199804/27/0427112.htm


>


> '在公共交通方面,在三號幹線(郊野公園段)(包括大欖隧道)於數星期後通車前,


> 將不會有巴士路線途經汀九橋。'





即係要嚮六月中大欖隧道通車時, 巴士路線先一次過改道?


而唔會改行汀九橋, 再改行大欖隧道?


Article 3: (Request 1)

> 其實運豬署可以讓61X,62X,960及961先途經汀九橋?





62X 行嗎?


Article 4:

開77有冇用?


Joseph Ho (kchojbl@school.net.hk) at Mon Apr 27 21:52, 1998 said:


其實77係咪真係咁有需要開辦?





(以下四大點唔得閒可以唔睇)





以我呢個東區人估計,77 o既客路應該有幾個:





1. 田灣/香港仔/黃竹坑 來往 銅鑼灣





田灣就真係需要有巴士服務,但係石排灣、香港仔已經有72,黃竹坑


就有埋鴨利洲車,所以唔開77只係對田灣居民造成不便,其實用$7搭


77去銅鑼灣會唔會貴o左o的?





2. 田灣/香港仔/黃竹坑 來往 北角或以東





田灣同香港仔可能會有人需要去筲箕灣,去北角已經有38、42,而由


黃竹坑去筲箕灣就已經有99,所以77只係做多o左批田灣同香港仔去


筲箕灣(包括太古、則魚涌)o既客。





3. 銅鑼灣/北角 往 耀東





以城巴呢講都已經有條一模一樣99,所以開唔開77都冇問題(淨係講


呢點)。





4. 黃竹坑/香港仔 往 田灣





由黃竹坑去田灣會有客,雖然香港仔有79,但係九月摺,所以呢點應


該有需求。





總括呢講,77條線只係新o左o係:


1. 田灣 直接來往 銅鑼灣及東區至筲箕灣


2. 香港仔 直接來往 東區至筲箕灣


3. 黃竹坑 直接來往 田灣





講到最尾,我想問o下大家認為77應唔應該縮短去銅鑼灣(唔理有冇


位先)並調低車費?因為呢條線可以話係為田灣居民而設,不過出銅


鑼灣實在太貴。








Joseph Ho


VA53 - HN9798


DA89 - HH6355


Article 4: (Request 1)

開孖七當然有用啦...


之不過如果叫38,42發展多條線延長到筲箕灣/小西灣, 肯定更加


有用....





77開辦, 我想是必要的, 因為田灣人要出去嘛....


不過又唔駛去咁遠... 天后已夠了. (72B?!)





仲有, 剛才放工時間在炮台山, 有架孖七先埋站, 原本有幾


個人想上車, 點知後面整o左架 38 的 DM, o的人(包括原無打


算上77的十人)全部去晒架熱狗唔上冷馬.





我諗77暫時都是北角以東的人坐啦...


想同38,42(甚至41A)鬥?! 等一年啦!





--


HKBDB北角區長


Article 4: (Request 2)

> Joseph Ho (kchojbl@school.net.hk) said:





> 講到最尾,我想問o下大家認為77應唔應該縮短去銅鑼灣(唔理有冇


> 位先)並調低車費?因為呢條線可以話係為田灣居民而設,不過出銅


> 鑼灣實在太貴。





原本就係72B田灣 - 天后,但係銅鑼灣無位擺,於是咪順手落到筲箕灣,


又順手上埋耀東囉。





咁o個區又真係要有條咁o既路線去東區,特別係香港仔無車去北角以東


o既地方。





至於車費貴,無計o架啦,又唔係賣飛,無得雙向分段......一係將72加


車北行經田灣囉。(肥魚殺o左我都似......)


Article 4: (Request 3)

> David Tsui (DA71)116 (s9501860@student.ouhk.edu.hk) said:


>


> 請你唔好話77無用,我知你住北角,但我住在魚則魚涌,而我


> 有一位同學(DA68)住香港仔,如果我從他的家返回我家,請


> 問我坐什麼? 不要說叫我坐38,42轉2A,8。





事先聲明,不是針對77(因我已說過這條線是「有用」的),但如果單以


此例子來證明一條線「有用」,似乎不能成立。





「我有位同學住寶馬山,我住在華富村,如果從他的家返我家,請問


我坐什麼?不要說叫我坐42轉25, 25M。」





那麼就要一條路線由華富去寶馬山嗎?





我的學校在西營盤,有同學住屯門、新田圍和大埔,日日由上述地點


往返西環,那麼巴士公司就要為它們一人開一條線?轉一轉車沒什麼


大不了吧?那位住新田圍的同學,每天騎「鴨」一小時(87B)到旺角轉


904/905上學,也不見得有問題。


Article 4: (Request 4)

> 小豬 (newflyer@sympatico.ca) said:


>


> 但係,而家事實上係有一條線來往北角經寶馬山去華富的41A喎,


> 唔可以話冇線啊。





噢!我本來想指天后廟道/寶馬山道一帶





> 但係,講開又講,如果係人都要一條直達線來往原居地到目的地,


> 咁成個香港咪都係巴士,例如話有些人係大陸包二奶,咁係咪要係


> 香港各區各屋村都要整條過境巴士線呢?





哈哈!以前又真係好多屋村有直巴番大陸o架,o的老闆以為「有需求」嗎!


結果班班一兩個客,好多都取消o左lu


Article 4: (Request 5)

你有需要還你有需要,巴士公司開一條線係要睇有冇一定數量乘客o既


需求。





就算將來77頂閘都唔出奇,因為有好多人通常有乜車上乜車,唔會等


死38、42、72、99等等。





仲有,我冇話77完全冇用,田灣同香港仔會有佢一定客量。唔好忘記,


啊Colin話呢條線原本係去銅鑼灣,編號72B。








Joseph Ho


Article 4: (Request 6)

你咁肯定,村長你都唔識? :D





暫時唔見得77會好客,等田灣入哂伙先會好


Article 4: (Request 7)

> Jacky Tsang (lbjackyt@polyu.edu.hk) said:


> 你咁肯定,村長你都唔識? :D





佢話梗 Joseph Ho 呀~!





> 暫時唔見得77會好客,等田灣入哂伙先會好





都入o左好多喇喎~ 但個商場底個總站就唔知做乜, 冇人理..





.....


T.P.T.


Article 4: (Request 8)

Colin Chang (kalim@netvigator.com) said:


>


> 原本就係72B田灣 - 天后,但係銅鑼灣無位擺,於是咪順手落到筲箕灣,


> 又順手上埋耀東囉。





筲箕灣總有一日都會冇位o既o者, 咁第日開線拉去小西灣乎? 小西灣冇位入石澳乎?


話時話只要北碼做少少調動, 例如叫第時新記 set 番好 D 時間表, 等兩三條線


(例如 27/63) 可以泊一條坑, 咁空條坑出黎咪得囉.





> 咁o個區又真係要有條咁o既路線去東區,特別係香港仔無車去北角以東


> o既地方。





我諗南區線都應該發展飽和喇卦? 石排灣重建後會唔會又開線?


Article 5:

Re: 在水中央~~


Jacky Chong (mingtin@netteens.net) at Mon Apr 27 15:50, 1998 said:


> Flying Chuk (chuk@netvigator.com) said:


> 何解呢架車唔會死火?照計D水到死氣喉的


> 高度,佢D死氣又冇咁好力'吹水'呀...


> (PS:佢車頭架Cooler Fan就真係吹水..


> 我估佢行完呢條路車廂都入左D水,如果換部


> 底地台咪...游泳池咁款?!)


>


>


>


> (圖片出自生果日報)





其實o向咁o既情況之下, o的死氣並唔係用o黎'吹水', 而係用o黎頂


住o的水, 唔比o的水湧入引擎.


如果架車係低地台, 我唸個師傅都唔會衝過去, 因為個車廂一定會


變成水塘咁樣.


Article 5: (Request 1)

點解老虎報的相和生果報的相一樣?!?





Dickson2


Article 5: (Request 2)

> Yeung Chun Yat (yeungtwl@hkstar.com) said:


> 其實死氣喉0既氣係會係行駛中及加速時噴出死氣, 如果當個司機收油


> 0既時候, 引擎亦會順勢減速, 而死氣喉亦會好似吸氣咁吸0左出面0的空


> 氣. 所以有時我地見到0的車係在水中央0既情況下壞車, 原因就係個


> 司機收油, 0的水俾個死氣口吸0左入副偈度而死火. (另外一個原因就係


> 0的水直接濺上副偈度.)


>


> 阿逸


> --------


> 3AV318


> HG4200


仲有如果生風口或分火器(油渣偈冇的,電油偈先有)俾水入左


咁一樣都會死火嫁.





如果D水經生氣或死氣o華佬入左氣缸咁就手尾長lu~





飛機竺


Article 5: (Request 3)

> Flying Chuk (chuk@netvigator.com) said:


>


> 如果我做司機我就用一波踩盡,增加死氣壓力,以免死火.


> 但如果行底轉數,死氣出得唔順,咪會死火?!


>


> 飛機竺





但係巴士係自動波喎.點 Lock 一波呀?最多咪鎖 3/4 波!


Article 5: (Request 4)

> Spike Wu.(2001)(G16) (abspike@school.net.hk) said:


> 如果係DART既話,九記係呢個時候會唔會即刻收番D車?





仲有ATR1呢?彌敦道係水浸黑點喎。








在拉記的


Article 6:

Re: 古董巴士


Flying Chuk (chuk@netvigator.com) at Mon Apr 27 17:09, 1998 said:


> AV89 (ngpt@netvigator.com) said:


> 請問現時香港有什麼曾是專利巴士的古董巴士是可出街載人的?


> 如果巴士公司拎部古董出來行, 會有什麼事發生?


> 另外,請問Daimler A,Daimler E,和白水箱的極速是多少?


講起古董巴士我想起今日方向日報話香港榑物館想要架


白水箱同一批舊制服放在榑物館,現在同中巴傾緊,遲D仲有


可能有攪個香港古代交通展.





在雷電交加的屯門的


飛機竺


Article 6: (Request 1)

> 九巴那些開頂牛啦, 中巴白水箱啦 ...





不過果D丹拿A, AEC, 同埋SpeedyBus o既寶都最多可載七人


(連司機)~~~





> > 如果巴士公司拎部古董出來行, 會有什麼事發生?





> 冇咩o架, o的人望多兩眼囉.





以前亞艾華學長響度提過~~~:p





以前有次SpeedyBus搞functions law D815同D1007行40同2E時,


真係有人遞手截車同追車o架~~~ :p





---


比達~


Article 6: (Request 2)

> Peter (klaleung@hkstar.com) said:


> 好似以前艾華兄響度提過~~~


> 有次必達搞functions lawD815同D106行40同2E時,


> 真係有人遽手截車同追車o架~~~





呢o的都唔算古董巴士啦, 七十年代o既巴士都係古董的話,


我同你都係古董咯.





--


車匙!


(PS: 必達冇架車叫 D106 o番.)


Article 6: (Request 3)

Should it be D1007 instead?


他是否在指D1007呢﹖


Article 6: (Request 4)

> AV89 (ngpt@netvigator.com) said:


>


> 即係話, 假如HK104出返來行8, 牛行39M會有乜事? ^_^





唔敢上車卦.


Article 7:

搞笑師傅加搞笑乘客


Joseph Ho (kchojbl@school.net.hk) at Mon Apr 27 20:04, 1998 said:


> T.P.T. (96029036d@hkpucc.polyu.edu.hk) said:


> 今日行車:443,470,477,501,595...





428, 462, 471, 491, 505, 591, 601...





> 而客量就普普通通啦!(以新線來說) 響田灣村開出有五至八人.





我坐o個車都有番十幾個客。





> 講起由田灣臨時站開都幾冤枉...


> 田灣山道總站→交通燈→石排灣道→田灣街→田灣山道→石排


> 灣道→香港仔海旁道....


>


> 我都唔明城巴o架! 好心佢響田灣街(即田灣新街天橋底)做總站


> 啦! 又要響田灣山道做總站喎~ 佢呢度做總站, 之後又要再兜


> 返入田灣, 真無謂!





唔知係城巴定運輸局諗o既呢?





> 我都好難得響咁「好」天影到幾張相~ ^_^





你竟然影到相?今日邊個時候冇落雨?





------





等我講o下我頭先坐o個程77先,真係幾好笑。





開新線就緊係要站站停Promote o下啦,不過o係耀東o既一個分站,


個師傅開門之後,有個有內地口音大概五十幾歲o既乘客(啊嬸)走


埋呢問:「去邊架?」


個師傅話:「香港仔、田灣呀。」


啊嬸話:「唔o岩呀。」


師傅又加多句:「經北角、則魚涌。」(按:有冇搞錯呀,扼人用


七蚊搭車落北角!?)


個啊嬸就即刻上車,話:「你話去北角我就o岩呀。」(按:之後佢


話去銅鑼灣!?)


跟住啊嬸問幾錢,師傅話七蚊,佢竟然冇乜反應,不過就話:


「99都係六個四之o麻。」


師傅同一個坐導航位o既乘客一齊話:「加o左價啦。」


之後師傅繼續話:「呢架同99一樣收七蚊。」





我唔知個師傅咩心態,同人講話呢架車經北角,同99一樣收七蚊,佢


係講得o岩,不過...





個啊嬸又係,可能佢唔係耀東居民,唔知佢其實只係用兩個七已經可


以去到銅鑼灣(冷氣車都係三個七)...





真係搞笑!








Joseph Ho


VA36 - GV6348


DA60 - GX9848


Article 7: (Request 1)

落咁多車?!


你坐..? 朝早十一點幾都可以上网, 唔駛返學呀~?


唔知呢~? 仲之好麻煩啦!


今日係未停過雨既, 係三點鐘稍為冇咁大雨o者!


拎住把「雨傘」喎, 又拎相機, 我都怕怕地, 要渣機極得好穩先影!


雨下既巴士相好靚o架~


站站停, 我唔得佢死呀~


係咁o架啦o的司機...





見到78用雞即刻追都追唔切既.....


T.P.T.


Article 7: (Request 2)

> DA90(Rt.38字軌車) (refchan@netteens.net) said:


>


>


> 我今日在香港仔伏城記77,點知由三點九等到三點十一架470先施施然到站,真過份!!





咁資料話係15分鐘一班車嘛... 都係等o左兩個字o者,無事喎。





不過作為一條新線,第一日少人搭係正常o既,好似今日11:30搭車


返工, 有架晌惠安苑向筲箕灣o既77(447)就得2,3個人,另一邊向


田灣o既都有6,7個。晚上搭116返屋企,沿路(約8:40-9:10)見到


三架向田灣o既77(471,63?,443)每架都係得十零個搭客。


Article 7: (Request 3)

要那麼多時間就是因為公司落了Order,無論個站有無人,


都要停(消息來自77號司傅 Fleet No. 604),又加上在田


灣兜來兜去,無什麼出奇!





城記77號路線負責人:David Tsui (DA71)


Article 7: (Request 4)

梗係啦! 佢剩係響田灣都兜成兩個幾三個字~


你諗下, 佢由前一架#595(好似..)響田灣兜一圈, 再轉出香港仔,


等二架470已經準備開出..





P.S. 請 cut 文!


.....


T.P.T.


Article 8:

Re: 170問題


Ricky Chan (95098987d@polyu.edu.hk) at Tue Apr 28 01:42, 1998 said:


> 阿童 (wmanlai@netvigator.com) said:


> 170在阿城接手前,阿九是否全派M和BL車行字軌呢?





九巴是全派 M 行走, 包括M5,6,39,40等.





> 而阿中及阿九最後一架行170雞鴨分別是幾多號?


> 阿城接手前後路線有冇改變?何時開辦?


> 開辦後何時開始經新翠秦石?





城巴接手後因為改用十二米車, 往華富改行何文田忠孝街;


170 早於75年10月開辦, 至大約88年才改經新翠秦石一帶.





Ricky Chan


Article 8: (Request 1)

> 阿童 (wmanlai@netvigator.com) said:


> 170在阿城接手前,阿九是否全派M和BL車行字軌呢?而阿中及阿九最


> 後一架行170雞鴨分別是幾多號?阿城接手前後路線有冇改變?何時


> 開辦?開辦後何時開始經新翠秦石?


>


> 希望板友可為我解答?Thanks!   『阿童








我曾經看見阿中有出DA去行170啊!不過就唔知收費如何?


至於路線方面,袛知道到了去年年中,因為培正道左轉落公主道 o既彎位


已經擴闊了的關係,170唔再經佛光街、忠孝街及忠民街。








5D 德褔花園 往 紅磡 (循環線)


主力之一 DC 7456


Article 8: (Request 2)

It was a special morning one-way departure from Wah Fu only. The bus would serve on route 303(?) after finishing the trip.


那班車是一班晨早特別車。很像做完170以後會去做303。


Article 8: (Request 3)

> 德褔5D (97089033d@polyu.edu.hk) said:


>


> 我曾經看見阿中有出DA去行170啊!不過就唔知收費如何?





咁請問你在那年看見DA行rt.170?





如果現在rt.170還有熱狗,收費如下(虛構)





全程收費:$11.80





-過獅子山隧道後至華富 $9.70


-過海底隧道後至華富 $5.80


-過香港仔隧道後至華富 $3.40





-過香港仔隧道後至沙田 $10.40


-過海底隧道後至沙田 $7.30


-九龍塘(沙福道)至沙田 $4.40








VA61~~~~~~東區郡主


Article 8: (Request 4)

> eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:


>


> 城記接辦後就摺左銅鑼灣特別班次.


> 其實呢個銅鑼灣特別班次有咩用呢? 係咪要用多幾部字軌呢?


是為方便銅鑼灣的夜歸人士, 當時的開車時間如下:


沙田火車站開 - 1930-2015


銅鑼灣(摩利臣山道)開 - 2000-2100


假日停開





城記在1993年接辦170後, 由於將服務時間延長至平日 2225 及假日


2230, 因此不再需要銅鑼灣短程車服務, 故此將之摺埋.





1996年1月22日, 170服務時間延長至每日0600-2345, 後於八月擴展


為廿四小時服務, 凌晨班次以N170行駛, 當時通宵線單程收費


$21.50.





北區首相


Article 9:

Re: 問960,961 (估估O下)


Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) at Mon Apr 27 20:48, 1998 said:


> R Lai (raymansc@asiaonline.net) said:


> 數條路線將會改行汀九橋


> 而960,961是明顯地只改中間行車路線,不會影響停站.


> 改行汀九橋一定會比現有行車時間少,但未必大加班次.


> 所以你估九記會否減車?減多少車?





960, 961 會行汀九橋咩? 好似路程冇乜短o左喎 ...


Article 9: (Request 1)

應該短左架?


汀九橋 + 長青隧道 + 藍巴勒海峽橋一定短過屯公汀九至荃灣 + 荃灣路.


Article 9: (Request 2)

I have timed that from West Kowloon Expressway (split point for Tuen Mun and Tsing Yi),


via Tsuen Wan Rd to Tuen Mun Rd and upto Ting Kau needs 7.5 mins. (exclude congestion time).





However, the way via Ting Kau Bridge should be a half less. Moreover, if congestion is


taken into account, time saved should be much more, especially in morning peak.





Moreover, 61X may also re-route to go Ting Kau Bridge. How is your view?


Article 9: (Request 3)

> 德褔5D (97089033d@polyu.edu.hk) said:


>


> 除 o左 61X之外,還有62X,258D,259D都應該要改路行


> 汀九橋、長青隧道及藍巴勒大橋,除了里數會少D之外,重要就係


> 能夠避開屯門公路的塞車煩惱,唔駛日日再 o係 荃灣路慢駛





但 唔 好 忘 記 一 點 , 據 政 府 有 關 部 門 調 查 所 得 ,


當 全 條 三 號 幹 線 ( 包 括 大 欖 隧 道 ) 通 車 後 ,


將 會 有 大 量 ( 係 大 量 ) 貨 櫃 車 使 用 此 幹 線 往 返 邊 境 及 葵 涌 貨 櫃 碼 頭 ,


到 時 於 屯 門 公 路 與 三 號 幹 線 的 交 界 處 將 有 可 能 ( 係 可 能 ) 有 塞 車 既 情 況 出 現 !


所 以 這 一 切 一 切 都 要 在 通 車 後 才 有 定 奪 .





弊 , 過 晒 鐘 番 學 ! 閃 呀 ......


Article 10:

行大欖隧道的巴士線


叮噹 (tinghoyi@netvigator.com) at Tue Apr 28 10:03, 1998 said:


今天小弟看生果日報,入面有了一個行新大隧巴士線的起迄點的表,


各版友可以看看。





新大隧新線


Article 10: (Request 1)

風間火月 (adagatha@netvigator.com) said:


>


> 求其我都執到幾個錯處:


>


> 69X 天蕊村-佐敦道碼頭 乜有個天蕊村咩?





相信係天慈村, 但天慈村個總站實在細得可以....


咁 69P 又駛唔駛改呢?





> 269B 美湖居-紅墈碼頭 美湖居?


> 269C 美湖居-觀塘碼頭 唔係比人嘈而照去藍田咩?





乜美湖居總站仲有坑咩? 可以用非專利線總站架?





> 另外,我唔知呢個係唔係錯:


>


> 68X 元朗東-佐敦道碼頭 元朗西的人坐乜呀?





咪坐 69X 囉, 得唔得呢? 63X 都好似得喎!





> 生果報,唉!信HKBDB好過啦! :P





咁呢句又真! 不過都要睇下係邊個放料. ^_^


Article 10: (Request 2)

> eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:


>


> 相信係天慈村, 但天慈村個總站實在細得可以





It is Tin Shui Estate, the terminus still be maintained


It was only the typing error of Apply Daily.





> 咁 69P 又駛唔駛改呢?


>


>


> 乜美湖居總站仲有坑咩? 可以用非專利線總站架?


>


>


> 咪坐 69X 囉, 得唔得呢? 63X 都好似得喎!


>


>


> 咁呢句又真! 不過都要睇下係邊個放料. ^_^


Article 10: (Request 3)

> eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:


>


> 相信係天慈村, 但天慈村個總站實在細得可以....


> 咁 69P 又駛唔駛改呢?


小弟就得得如果連69P都改埋,咁仲駛乜要69P喎。


>


> 乜美湖居總站仲有坑咩? 可以用非專利線總站架?


我諗佢指的美湖居即係我地叫的天水圍市中心總站啊。而城巴個


美湖居站,其實就係景湖居隔離,所以小弟都對那兒的總站名R


晒頭!


>


> 咪坐 69X 囉, 得唔得呢? 63X 都好似得喎!


不過,63X耐好多喎,乜唔係話過68X轉去元朗西做總站咩?


>


> 咁呢句又真! 不過都要睇下係邊個放料. ^_^


小弟深有同感 ^_^


Article 11:

Re: 搭什麼車可去到世界殯儀館?


eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) at Tue Apr 28 00:02, 1998 said:


Leyland (fhlee7@ie.cuhk.edu.hk) said:


> 如題.





3B, 5C, 7B, 8, 11X, 15, 嚮機利士南路落車行過對面.


Article 11: (Request 1)

> Stanley Yung (n281@hkstar.com) said:


>


> 2E, 6C, 6F, 8A, 11K, 12A, 21, 30X, 41, 45, 85C,


> 106, 115, 212, 230X, 69x, 81C, 87D, N216, N241, N281


> A2, A3, A5, KCRC, K16, 所有中隧之隧巴


> 還有 一些可直接送你入殯儀館的車輛





運財車?





還有的士, 小巴2號, 6號, 8號, 旅遊巴(港深投資家屬專車),


私家車......


Article 11: (Request 2)

住香港的朋友可搭115, 又係o係機利士南路落車行過對面.


Article 12:

Re: 乞人曾--Falcon!!


柏齊斯 (riccardo@chevalier.net) at Mon Apr 27 20:13, 1998 said:


> 沙電學徒 (ranger@hknet.com) said:


> 本人今天修理FALCON冷氣,柯打話(冷氣吾涼,有時冇冷氣!!)


> 頭先CHECK番,原耒冇冷媒,只有小量晌PUMP內,杰果加番又吾得!!!


> 吾X涼,大件時呀,要拆PUMP呀





哦! 咁得罪講句, 呢o的只係代表o左閣下或帶住閣下個師傅冇經


驗所致囉, 冷氣機冇咩o架o者: 凍/熱 Coil 有問題, 風扇唔識


起動, 燒索制, 漏雪種, 溫度探頭壞, 再唔係就係雪種泵極力子


唔識埋, 係咁多...


拿, 咪話我呢個九灣廠大偈唔塞錢入你袋喇( :P ) 打開冷氣機蓋,


如果唔係聞倒有 [火農] 味o既話 (聞倒就換得索制啦), o係做任


何野之前都應該著o左部冷氣行佢一陣...開o左機, 睇倒雪種鏡唔


清就即係唔夠/冇雪種, 又睇埋風扇, 如果唔識轉就睇o下個帶相電


容有冇事, 凍熱 Coil 呢, 咪睇o下佢多唔多水痕或者有冇生到銅


綠囉, 樣樣野冇事, 再睇埋個雪種泵極力子, 睇o下識唔識埋, 唔


識o既, 又要分到底係個溫度探頭有事還是個極力子本身...


懷疑漏雪種咩? 咪睇o下o的銅喉有冇穿, 喉 fittings 有冇鬆囉,


通常漏雪種o個一個位係會有比其他地方多o的塵o既, 所以打開蓋


就見倒其中一撻地方特別多塵o既話, 已經係一個好好o既指標...





希望可以幫倒你/你師傅...





機械工程司長


重型維修技師


鐵路技術顧問 -- 柏齊斯


(3AD77-HM4457/S3V10-GK4457/DC10-EZ548)


推介網頁


Article 12: (Request 1)

冷媒是否=雪種呀?(我唔多慣講冷媒)


如果係咁,我估多數係穿左喉,加返個時Check下


邊到有D白色o野流出o黎.就係個度穿左啦.


(不過雪種呢家o野好煩,一個針孔咁大就可以


流左去)


(PS:九巴現在係咪仲用R22,還是改用R134a呀?)





飛機竺


Article 12: (Request 2)

冷氣吾得,一係机件吾德,成日冇冷氣的最MORE,真是乞人曾呀!!!!


Article 12: (Request 3)

唔該唔好加呢o的「助語詞」呀.


Article 13:

Re: Trident 與水


S3BL (tin@school.net.hk) at Mon Apr 27 18:22, 1998 said:


> koala (koala@cuhk.edu.hk) said:


> 前排坐72 (M) 遇著大雨, 只見下車梯級有水浸至, 假如沒有梯級,


> 肯定會流入車廂內 (小弟當時站在門附近, 只見積水滾來滾去, 尤


> 其到馬場旁的吐露港公路及至瀝源停站時為甚).


>


> 小弟無知, 但假如派的車不是M而是躉或低地台Dart仔, 那會不會...





小弟仲無知過你,唔駛驚。 ^_^


一定預左有水入啦! 不過就可以靠地台一D 去水孔幫手。唔知躉及低地台


會不會有多些去水孔呢?


小弟曾經搭過一架S3BL (多企位版),架車D 去水孔塞晒,當堂成個


地台都有水!





S3BL15


Article 13: (Request 1)

> S3BL (tin@school.net.hk) said:


>


> 一定預左有水入啦! 不過就可以靠地台一D 去水孔幫手。唔知躉及低地台


> 會不會有多些去水孔呢?





恐怕係街上水位高過架車個地台, 幾多去水孔都冇用.


仲要係水從各去水孔灌入車箱...... :)





> 小弟曾經搭過一架S3BL (多企位版),架車D 去水孔塞晒,當堂成個


> 地台都有水!





密籠仲慘, 佢車箱設計跟本冇去水孔.


Article 13: (Request 2)

我都試過,我坐個架係AL,成個地台都係水.


如果Trident入左水之後'Dup'車兼轉右,


咁D水咪會好似瀑布咁係前門流出?!





飛機竺


Article 13: (Request 3)

有次紅雨我搭 85B 返沙田,


去到顯徑商場外,


有一(乙水)水,架S3BL行過時,


的水立即從去水孔和後樓梯湧上,


直情好似噴泉甘,好采無咩人,


但我就俾水淺到一褲都係囉,


你話幾利害。





P.S.


今日架 S3M52 終於回到 85 la!


我覺得架車比以前大力左,


滿人上斜都無死下死下。


但換來的就是無左架冷馬。





S3M 52


DN 9789


Article 14:

Re: 用八達通俾錢可以用乜方法


eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) at Mon Apr 27 23:55, 1998 said:


FF1819 (rainbow@netteens.net) said:


>


> 唔知各位板友有冇見人用o的好奇特的方法用八達通觸碰收費器呢?


> 我見過有人將張八達通擺o向褲後袋, 然後用佢o個個部位撞落收費器!


> 又或者有些懶o既女人將張八達通放落前衫袋, 然後必的一聲...........


>


> 唔知各位有冇o的更奇特o既方法呢?





通常都冇乜奇唔奇特o既, 咪有 D 小姐/阿嬸/師奶鍾意將張八達通放嚮個幾吋厚o既


手袋入面, 再成個手袋放上個感應器上面囉, 最奇就係咁都讀到資料!





我想再問一次 (以前問過冇人答) 張咭過機時, 「嘟」一聲比較尖, 係咪扣到負數


咁解?


Article 14: (Request 1)

> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:


>


>


> It actually means that a concession (children or pensioner) Octopus has been validated.


> 那是代表剛剛有人用了一張優惠(小童或老人)八達通乘車。





咁較為低沉o既係咪負數? 還是另有所指? 請指教! :)





LF126


Article 15:

Re: 城記新 969 路線資料海報


Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Tue Apr 28 00:07, 1998 said:


> 417 (96006257@plink.cityu.edu.hk) said:


> 今朝坐 5 號返學時 (#599),見到車上有張 969 o既路線資料海報,


> 好多顏色,o係個底度仲有各款八達通公仔o忝。有時間可以睇睇佢。





What kind of information are included in the poster?


海報上有什麼資料﹖





> 今晚搭 5B,去到大球場外原本應該向前跳飛機,點知變o左俾前面架


> 3xx 放飛機o既顧客兼證人 417





Bad luck! (Just kidding! Don't shoot me!)


真失敗﹗^_^ (說笑而已﹗不要介意﹗)


Article 15: (Request 1)

請click去呢度


Article 15: (Request 2)

> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:


> What kind of information are included in the poster?


> 海報上有什麼資料﹖





有特大路線圖,彩色分段時間表同收費表,當然唔少得宣傳該線用得


8 仔o既句子喇。





417


Article 16:

坐頭班城巴77的感受


David Tsui (DA71)116 (s9501860@student.ouhk.edu.hk) at Mon Apr 27 19:16, 1998 said:


聽到了77號將會在今天開辦,我一早就與CTB537一起去田灣


總站由於早的關係,而N72又不經,所以要坐的士去。但去到


田灣村,只見到77的普通站牌,,沒有總站牌,於是就到處尋


找。結果原來總站泊在田灣山道,有一個司機好無禮貌,問


他東西不答,又同其他人講粗口,唉...城記其實真係好Dull,


總站就不載客,兜上了田灣村,才停回總站。據司傅說由於


政府不能及時開放田灣巴士總站,所以被迫泊街邊。


 頭班車: Fleet No.: 601


第二班車: Fleet No.: 604


第三班車: Fleet No.: 428


第四班車: Fleet No.: 462


其他無時間去留意,因為要返學


頭班車共有6位乘客(自己在內)





城記77號負責人:David Tsui (DA71)


Article 16: (Request 1)

查實你搭 N72 都到o架! 你可以響田灣站落車, 之後行入去,


全程唔駛五分鐘..


係呢~! 好難先搵到呀! 有架77響田灣街攪「筲箕灣」..


我都唔知邊係總站啦! 之後沿路行先搵到響田灣山道..





.....


T.P.T.


Article 16: (Request 2)

> Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) said:


>


> 你問佢咩o野呢? 佢當時做緊乜o野?





我在忙於找77的總站,我問他77號總站在那裡?可是他不


答。又落狗屎,真係令我很狼狽!


Article 17:

Re: 城記乘客跳飛機制一問


SuperBuzz (dccheng@acs.itd.uts.edu.au) at Tue Apr 28 12:59, 1998 said:


> Zenga (96479104@plink.cityu.edu.hk) said:


>


> 咁慘呀﹗轉唔到機﹗:p 兩部機都去同一度地方﹐又相同路線﹐洗乜轉機丫﹗


> 一時間想問﹐城記除左5B﹐有乜線都會有乘客向前跳飛機0既情況﹖


> 城記又會唔會0係第一間要乘客參與跳飛機0既巴士公司﹖


> 城記真係得意﹐身為乘客都有份玩跳飛機﹗


>


> 輕鐵司長


> 辛格





If you consider this matter on a worldwide basis, Sydney Buses is another one that does the trick. Sydney Buses drivers will wait at intermediate stops to swap over to another bus or the passengers will do. It is pretty time consuming as they not only have to move the driver ID, but all their bags, money tray and anything he has.


Article 17: (Request 1)

仲有以前九記 100 號. 去到尖東總站, 有時 (唔係一定) 乘客同師傅都要過車.


應該係喇.


Article 17: (Request 2)

Zenga (96479104@plink.cityu.edu.hk) said:


> 城記又會唔會0係第一間要乘客參與跳飛機0既巴士公司﹖





> eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:


> 應該係喇.





咁以前坐嶼巴上昂平, 先坐雞車到石壁再轉單層巴士又算唔算?


Article 18:

Re: 有關'中巴迷聯盟'


Gakei! (板務助理) (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) at Tue Apr 28 00:17, 1998 said:


> VA40 (wailap@netvigator.com) said:


> 凡'中巴迷聯盟'之現有會員或有興趣加入者,


> 請依貓俾我 (VA40) 或 塞米一條 (VA51)索取登記表格!


> 釘橋! ^_^


> Email address of VA40 : wailap@netvigator.com


> Email address of VA51 : parnell@hkstar.com





你覺不覺得你們的宣傳密了一點?


我建議你們建一個網頁, 負責宣


傳及招收會員等事宜.請不要在本


板作過度頻密的宣傳.





--


家祺!


Article 18: (Request 1)

唔該你地唔好貼得咁密啦, 又想學某版友成日貼某線要轉全日之文章


咁搞到o的版友反感呀!








唔係版務助理o既


Kevin Wong


Article 19:

Re: 為澳門居民worry!


VA-61 (kyy690@netvigator.com) at Mon Apr 27 22:41, 1998 said:


> 小丸子VA51 TONG HN8481 (k5959585@hkschool.net) said:


> 近排澳門治安不好,我十分worry這些市民搭巴士遇上


> 危險的案件!


>


> 1. 在巴士上協持巴士司機和乘客打劫,做人質:


> 2. 在巴士上放炸彈,和可能有不法分子楂走架


> 巴士做案:


> 3. 可能一d欠債還錢的人,在巴士上講數,講不


> 惦就做血案,嚇親d乘客:


>


> 以上係純緒虛構,請勿當真!


>


> I wish the macue townspeople to good luck:





咁由唔駛咁驚,D黑道中人唔會點錯相,又唔會做出你上述所講的事;


而家來講,現在來澳門只要冇仇家(最緊要千祈唔好得罪人),你來澳門就相安無事啦.





VA-61~~~~~~東區郡主


Article 19: (Request 1)

遊客不用驚


澳門治安不差


黑道中人唔會殺錯良民


Article 20:

密龍變身水塘(另加屯廠所見)


風間火月 (adagatha@netvigator.com) at Mon Apr 27 23:46, 1998 said:


今日放假走去青X觀拜先人(似乎遲左。的!)。





擔住把遮去搭58X入屯門,有架密龍(FY4唔知乜)埋站,咋咋臨追車!


結果連遮都爛埋,慘!





入完錢走上上層,十個空位九個濕到呀媽都唔認得,個個都唔去關窗,


濕左就濕左,典型香港人,無話可說!





好啦,搵到個位冇。甘濕(唔係冇濕)坐啦!放返隻腳落地,嘩!


全部都係水!我以為我坐船咋!





成個上層。的水四圍流,搖搖擺擺,乜密龍上層冇去水口咩?


終於落車,大雨到跳樓!為拜山冇計啦!





拜完冇乜雨,就走左去屯廠。大量龍躉停晒係裝崁廠外,我見至少8架!


重有2-3架九記多企位板AV。影影下又落大雨,屯廠又無瓦遮頭,點算?





好在有個九記唔知乜職員比我入架龍躉道避雨!真係好人!


後來有個人走黎試車,問我做乜係架車道,頭先個職員忽然彈出話佢比


我係道避雨!我就同呢兩位九記職員齊齊試新龍躉。(真好彩)





只係好短的試車,兜屯廠一個圈,但係我都好開心啦!





之後坐66返家,落雨落到唔知似咩,雨中行屯公好正!





AS3/AV112 風間火月


(好慘呀!要再踩六日先有假放呀!)


Article 20: (Request 1)

I don't think so, as they were originally designed as air-conditioned buses.


很像真的沒有﹗因為它們原本是空調設計的。


Article 20: (Request 2)

有時落雨見隔籬個位濕少少都會用紙巾抹好坐落去, 俾個路口位人


坐, 各位又會唔會呢?


呢過係密籠設計最失敗的地方. 講開又講, 平時冇留意, 正牌AD樓


上有冇去水口? AV都有啦!


尋晚坐老竇部寶馬暴雨中由屯公飛到落西九龍快速, 仲正!(當然唔


係真係飛, 係安全駕駛).





輝仔


Article 21:

Re: Double decker in Macau


Stanley Yung (n281@hkstar.com) at Tue Apr 28 00:06, 1998 said:


> Sin (a2744@netvigator.com) said:


> Who know about double decker in macau?Why they disappear?


> I saw it that was from Macau to taipa ,type like long cow


> of hong Kong.





請閱 Mice Davis 出的 Macau 書


Article 21: (Request 1)

The 'Macau Bus Handbook' written by Mr. Danny Chan has also got some photos of double deckers in Macau.


陳自瑜的‘澳門巴士手冊’也有一些有關澳門雙層巴士的圖片。


Article 22:

Re: ' 小環市' route in Macau


Stanley Yung (n281@hkstar.com) at Mon Apr 27 23:51, 1998 said:


> TONY (s614671@netvigator.com) said:


> Anyone can tell me the detail of ' 小環市' route in Macau?


> when I was young, I know there was a route call this


> during I visited Macau at that time. Still have this route now??





以前4號車叫小環市


路線同現時差不多





現時,澳門有很多路線都可稱小環市


如6,16,17


唔落車都可用$2.3遊澳門本土一圈


一圈可能要粒幾鐘





stanley yung


Article 23:

Re: MAN車攻入柴灣


Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Mon Apr 27 19:01, 1998 said:


> VA51(塞米一條) (parnell@hkstar.com) said:


> 小弟今日放學,見到有MAN行8X,但係因為看唔清,


> 請問係邊幾架呢?





Was it 2500?


是不是2500?


Article 24:

Re: 想知九記......


叮噹 (tinghoyi@netvigator.com) at Tue Apr 28 09:49, 1998 said:


> Turbo Cat (garylai@hknet.com) said:


> 在哪裏找到以下資料?


>


> i) 冷馬及熱九總數


> ii) 平均車齡


以上的資料,你可以在香港年報內找到。


> iii)近十年發生的大意外


呢個嗎,可以在619巴士網頁找到。


Article 25:

Re: KCRC 巴士一問???


Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Tue Apr 28 00:30, 1998 said:


> Bus Master (busman@hkabc.net) said:


> 現時 K11,K12,K14,K15,K16,K17,K18,50R 的車輛


> 晚上會泊那裡?火炭?洪水橋?





They should be parked in Fo Tan.


應該是停泊在火炭。


Article 26:

Re: 木瓜新slogan....


Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Mon Apr 27 23:17, 1998 said:


> Ronald (ronald_to@laser.zeronet.org.hk) said:


> 繼「城巴與你,共創繁榮千萬里」後,


> 今日收到城巴的信,又發現一句新口號︰


>


> 「城巴服務全面,配合社區發展」


>


> 遲0的會唔會油到架架有......





A letter from Citybus? What is that about?


一封城巴的信﹖關於什麼的﹖


Article 27:

Re: 有關'中巴迷聯盟'


Bus Master (busman@hkabc.net) at Mon Apr 27 23:45, 1998 said:


> VA51(塞米一條) (parnell@hkstar.com) said:


> 請所有中巴迷聯盟之會員sent份mail(一定要!)


> 比小弟,作統籌之用.釘橋!(e-mail address :


> parnell@hkstar.com )


> 至於有意加入者,也請sent份mail比小弟.唔該!





呢個聯盟有無註冊o架!


Article 28:

Re: 五月後,屯公X車一問


Stanley Yung (n281@hkstar.com) at Tue Apr 28 13:11, 1998 said:


> 88K (b9505044@ln.edu.hk) said:


> 汀九橋開放後,屯公的X車(如58X),


> 會否取道長青公路和汀九橋,


> 捨棄荃灣路?





不會,52x,58x,59x,60x,66x,67x,68x,69x,2xxx要經美孚





不過,我覺得59x,60x,66x,252B可行汀九橋,


不經美孚,從東京街/長沙灣上西九龍公路


因長沙灣/美孚有 52X,59A,60,66


60應延至西九龍中心





如九巴可將68保留


取消63M計劃


這樣63X,68X又可從東京街/長沙灣上西九龍公路





又省時,又可增加 52X,59A,60,66 的客量


亦方便九龍南往新界西北的乘客


不過從長沙灣/美孚上車的要用多十分鐘





rt.25xx, rt.26xx 可改行汀九橋及西九龍公路


從大角咀入旺角





STANLEY YUNG


Article 28: (Request 1)

63M--葵芳<->元朗(東)


63X--佐碼<->天慈





63M,63X都經屯門


Article 29:

Re: 2500......


東邪 (mingyin@hkstar.com) at Tue Apr 28 12:45, 1998 said:


> Joseph Ho (kchojbl@school.net.hk) said:


> 各位冇睇錯,我亦都冇睇錯,


>


> 2500 今日行 8X


>


> 08:05經過筲箕灣官立工業中學西行。


>


> 放學去捕o下佢先。


>


>


> 在學校的


> Joseph Ho





- 2500行8x都唔係第一次啦,小弟上個月都見過.





東邪


Article 30:

唔該各位....


DA54 (da54@netteens.net) at Tue Apr 28 03:57, 1998 said:


近排成日見''特別所見''有字軌車被寫上(較特別的車尤為嚴重):


DL1 行 112


DL2 行 2A


VA54+59+62 & 3AD1 行 102.....





我並非針對任何人, 但大家也要多看字軌表嘛!





-----


(Please note the bus list in the 'Scheduled Bus Lists' section.


Article 31:

下班時間的新馬路


Dickson2 (dickson2@macau.ctm.net) at Mon Apr 27 19:44, 1998 said:


在今天下班時間, 澳門降臨了一場大雨, 原本我想在沙梨頭會水浸,


而且我約了人, 咁我在五時半出門口搭MAN 往沙梨頭. 不知是否各


車主怕沙梨頭和新馬路水浸, 所以一路十分暢通, 好像晚上十二時


許咁多車. 但架巴士迫爆大閘. 到了新皇宮架車準備離站時, 有個


人想上車, 但架車當時已經再上不到客, 結果這位乘客用雨傘大力


打個車門. 當然架車無事啦! 原本想看看超低底台巴士在水浸下的


情景都無了! 唯有失望而回!





Dickson2


Article 32:

The WA Bus Debate 西澳買車爭論戰


Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Mon Apr 27 18:57, 1998 said:


Here in Perth, the debate on whether the new Mercedes Benz O405NH buses should be powered by diesel or by compressed natural gas continues. With the following information given, which choice would you consider to be better? And why?


在西澳柏斯﹐有關新一批平治O405NH巴士應否改用天然氣引擎的爭論﹐依然持續。


如果根據以下的資料﹐你認為那一種引擎會比較適合呢﹖為什麼﹖








Diesel-fuelled buses 柴油引擎巴士:





Bus cost: AUD$300,000


Fuel cost: About 70 cents a litre or $17,000 a year for a bus doing 400km a day.


Fuel avaliability: Widespread


Fuel quality: Known polluter depending on the grade. Low emission fuel not available here in WA.


Infrastructure requirements: Fuel outlets in depots, storage tankers and pumping browsers.


Reliability: With a long, proven good record.


Benefits: Reliable, cheaper buses.





Compress natural gas fuelled buses 天然氣引擎巴士:





Bus cost: AUD $323,000 to $350,000 , depending on brand and quantity of gas storage.


Fuel cost: About 35 cents a cubic metre or $8,000 a bus each year.


Fuel avaliability: Inefficient fuel that is compressed for storage on vehicles.


Fuel quality: An acknowledged clean fuel, with emissions 30 to 50% lower than diesel, depending on measurement.


Infrastructure requirements: Similar storage required plus a compressor.


Reliability: Big claims for reliability using latest technology.


Benefits: Cheaper to run and big environmental gains.








Source of Information 資料來源: The West Australian 27.4.98


Article 33:

請問......


VA51(塞米一條) (parnell@hkstar.com) at Mon Apr 27 18:17, 1998 said:


小弟有個問題要問,就係個巴士迷newsgroup係點link?


咩server咩group?請整個link在此,釘橋!


(由SARBA建立的SARBDC(香港凸區巴士討論中心)正在24


小時開放,歡迎內進加入討論).


http://infinity.hkhost.com/sarbdc/


Article 34:

(廣告)E31 on the Net更新


Flying Chuk (chuk@netvigator.com) at Mon Apr 27 17:31, 1998 said:


E31 on the Net車輛特寫加入了下列車輛:


Dennis Condon 12M(DL2)


九巴訓綀巴士(包括D,AA,AT)


力巴另類車輛(外勤車輛)





http://home.netvigator.com/~chuk





飛機竺


Article 35:

[廣告]BUSES PLACES 網頁廣告版


Spike Wu.(2001)(G16) (abspike@school.net.hk) at Mon Apr 27 15:44, 1998 said:


BUSES PLACES 網頁廣告版現已啟用,歡迎各位到來參觀!











Spike Wu.(2001)(G16)




Article 36:

晨早線可否行 西九龍公路


Stanley Yung (n281@hkstar.com) at Tue Apr 28 13:21, 1998 said:


從屯門/荃灣出尖沙咀的晨早線


可否行 西九龍公路/汀九橋?








230X,242X,260B,336,337


由佐敦入油麻地





237A,257B,258B,258C,259B,259C,261B,267S


由大角咀入旺角





252B 由東京街入長沙灣





STANLEY YUNG


Article 37:

(虛構)新記新線rt.782小西灣<==>海怡


VA-61 (kyy690@netvigator.com) at Mon Apr 27 23:11, 1998 said:


此路線可方便部份柴灣客去/返南區上班.





rt.782 小西灣<===>海怡半島





小西灣/海怡開出:0720-0830 10分鐘一班


1645-1945 15-20分鐘一班





假日停開





途經路線:沿食鬼rt.118/780行至堅拿道天橋,再沿rt.99/171/N171咁行.





收費:8.60(Air-cons Bus Only)








為東區交通■為未來



VA-61~~~~~~東區郡主


Article 38:

城巴過境線消息


Jacky Tsang (lbjackyt@polyu.edu.hk) at Tue Apr 28 13:45, 1998 said:


今日坐5號, 見有一張小單張





上寫著城巴往廣州過境服務大革新


往廣州的班次將增加金鐘的上客點


金鐘開出, 不停中港城, 停第一城


中港城開出, 不停第一城, 直達廣州





有冇人知詳情?


Article 39:

對前曾述的作出更正


Jealousy (c5013830@hkbu.edu.hk) at Tue Apr 28 13:38, 1998 said:


話說我曾經答了一些問題,但上週末check check 資料才知錯,特此更正:


1.82/5/6開的穗禾苑-小瀝源是84K而非86K.


2.216是與6M同日取消而非83年5月取消.


3.60M從未試過在九龍區開出,開線時已是荃鐵經新發至安定(D2路).


4.68M不是荃鐵開幕時開辦,當日開辦的應該是51M.


5.70M,71等不是82年改編號.





對以上曾經答錯問題而令各位不便謹此致歉.


P.S. TO唔記得邊個:263B,263C皆從未出現在發展計劃上;87真曾以


沙角街為總站.





傻傻可愛Jess