Today's Articles: 68.
Articles' Numbers: (19981127_01-68)
Article 1:
Re: 32B可能的新掛牌車
eric ching (bching@hk.super.net) from max7-39.hk.super.net at Thu Nov 26 18:21, 1998 said:
> Jacky,S3M80 (jackyyng@hkschool.net) said:
> 係CU5672. 今日本車行32B. 而CK2790只有四日命,話唔定
> 而家已經在廠內等死啦.
> 注:CK牌大泵把的壽命都唔會多過一個月,但煩請大家證實下.
> 32太守(講下)Jacky,S3M80
> 三十二號巴士討論區
what you want to prove?
Article 2:
Re: 又有大豪出現32巴總?!
HB 916 (tin@school.net.hk) from mp1442.hknet.com at Thu Nov 26 23:35, 1998 said:
> 32太守Jacky,S3M80 (jackyyng@hkschool.net) said:
> 在特別所見得知:3AV19,102於1545現身於32巴總行訓練.
>
> 以前(兩個月前)336掛牌車HE145都行過32訓練!
其實係唔係貪石圍角個站夠刺激, 所以搵大豪去操下轉彎呢?
>
> 好心九巴啦!批大豪咁得閒,不如行下32(即係加冷),批廢都
> 巴行訓練好過啦!
沙廠的3AV14,3AV19 是專用冷馬訓練車, 幾乎日日都訓練......
(真浪費!) 沙廠有不少後備冷馬, 夠32全冷咁滯...
HB 916 / HB 925
Article 2: (Request 1)
> S3M94 (matt4127@netteens.net) said:
>
> 係啦,抽兩,三架30x冷馬AD過32好過啦,嘈到死,督眼督鼻,調走左AD要換番D熱狗!
>
嘩! 你咁黑心都得o既! D AD o係你樓下嘈親你, 督親你就要掉去32, 咁石圍角象山
d人咪又要俾佢地嘈?? 正所謂'己所不欲, 勿施於人' 你咁做自唔自私d呀? 你應該
向九記投訴, 再唔係去環保署度嘈, 再唔得就望佢早d退役.
做人唔好咁自私先得架! 唔係個板同香港就係咁架la!
死老鬼SLK
Article 2: (Request 2)
完全同意，人心不足蛇吞象，凡事都要有程序，開始有冷馬時我夠
想我樓下全部線都有冷，但係九巴唔夠車嘛，唔通叫九巴掉晒d舊車
咩，定係要全部冷馬都行晒經過我樓下o既路線？依家有部分冷有馬
行，不過冇躉，唔通又叫九巴掉晒d舊冷馬要全躉？冇可能嘛，亦有
d板友話某某線有老人搭所以要用低地台車，唔通其他線完全冇老人
家？我唔係幫巴士公司或者九巴，如果係班次不足，抵插，車廂經常
污穢，要插，車長技術有問題，態度唔好，更加要插，至於某某線應
該用咩車，插完一兩次咪算囉，唔洗插完又插再插插插，我講咁多次
插你都悶啦，係咪？九巴又唔係唔買新車，亦唔係買幾部做o下樣就
算，如果係o既話，插多幾o野都嫌少呀！忍耐o下啦，年青人。
Allen Lee
Article 3:
'The heat is on!'
100/911R/M1 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) from olkc1a122.netvigator.com at Thu Nov 26 19:27, 1998 said:
Today when I took an ATR on 690 and 3001 on 691, both buses
had their heaters on, thus setting the optimal temperature
inside the bus.
Hence, as the bus companies often emphasizes, these are
'air-conditioned' buses, rather than 'cold-air buses'.
I'd bet most non bus fan passengers enjoy the optimum
temperature in the cabin, rather than smelling those air
from the garbage truck ahead.
Better yet, it has been raining on and off today. So what can
passengers on hotdog buses do? Open the windows so the seats
all get wet, hence nobody wants to sit on them? Or close all
the windows and breath the 'recycled' air?
100/911R/M1 Wong
Article 3: (Request 1)
好多人都知, 那不是 '暖氣' , 只係將水箱的熱氣泵番入車
箱, 所以會有一陣異味。
問題一: 點解又要開冷氣又泵番D 熱氣入車咁冇效率?
問題二: 究竟成日吸那陣異味會唔會影響健康呢?
你打賭還打賭, 唔該唔好當事實!
, 係唔係架架熱狗行親街都有架垃圾車頂著?
還有, Are *ALL* A/C buses *ALWAYS* at the optimum temperature for *ALL* people ???
P.S. 講呢講去三幅被, 個別例子當定理...
你唔悶都好, 好多人都俾你悶死...
Article 3: (Request 2)
So that you have to pay 15.3 instead of 10.6
Probably not, same smell when you're ironing your clothes.
Air (Water vapor) being ionized? I am just guessing.
What does this mean?
Good poem.
Article 3: (Request 3)
It's a Japanese name (Ageda-Man).
To Piccolo-san: Please don't use Japanese - not everyone's
computer can read them... it's as bad as using custom
Hong Kong characters.
spacehunt
Article 3: (Request 4)
根據在下一位在沙廠做事的朋友說, 開暖氣係有助冷氣更加平均
散佈在車廂的每一角落.
係......冇可能o既. 在下曾經在課堂時學過, 在設計冷氣時所用的一
張Chart, 內裏所列出的人體最舒適溫度, 只有大約九十幾巴仙(%)
的人是覺得舒適(至於那張chart的名稱及九十幾多巴仙, 在下真的
記不起, 唔好意思!), 其餘的人都會有以下兩種反應: 太涷 或 太熱.
若果在下找到資料, 會第一時間為大家解釋.
綠川光
Article 4:
問車牌+問題
Volvo (krispmk@netvigator.com) from hhtam034084.netvigator.com at Thu Nov 26 19:37, 1998 said:
現需求以下車牌:
KMB ATR ALL(With which body)
CTB Trident 2201-22xx(all after 2201)
另外Scania天幕巴哪時出廠?
Article 4: (Request 1)
Scania天幕巴哪時出廠?
我今日下午4:00p.m.左右見倒佢嚮尖沙咀新世界中心經過.
Article 4: (Request 2)
> KMB ATR ALL(With which body)
1)HJ2127, 2)HU4752*, 3)HU5515*, 4)HV6619, 5)HV6857, 6)HV6943, 7)HV7282, 8)HV7682, 9)HV7967,
10)HV8230, 11)HV6502, 12)HV6965, 13)HV7159, 14)HV7541, 15)HV8151, 16)HW3385, 17)HW3472,
18)HW4010, 19)HW4498, 20)HW4672, 21)HW4761, 22)HW4950, 23)HW5331, 24)HW5476, 25)HW5600,
26)HW5926, 27)HW6015, 28)HW6072, 29)HW6084, 30)HW6144, 31)HW7228, 32)HW7905, 33)HW7161,
34)HW7769, 35)HW8391, 36)HW8402, 37)HW7486, 38)HW8069, 39)HW8970, 40)HW9389, 41)HX859,
42)HX1961, 43)HX2449, 44)HX6756, 45)HX6880*, 46)HX7241, 47)HX7427, 48)HX7455*, 49)HX8024,
50)HX8152.
Duple Metsec*
> CTB Trident 2201-22xx(all after 2201)
2202)HV8262, 2203)HV6654, 2204)HV6874, 2205)HV7905, 2206)HW4172, 2207)HV7644, 2208)HW849,
2209)HW3621, 2210)HW6791, 2211)HW3550, 2212)HW8068, 2213)HW8037, 2215)HW6958, 2216)HW6835,
2217)HX5301, 2219)HX6499, 2220)HX4541, 2222)HX4605, 2232)HV7244, 2233)HV7880, 2234)HV7471,
2235)HV7692, 2236)HW1198, 2237)HV6915, 2238)HV7100, 2239)HW5088, 2240)HW5399, 2241)HV6640,
2242)HW2377, 2243)HV7299, 2244)HV7488, 2245)HV6889, 2246)HW4900, 2247)HV6518, 2248)HV7177,
2249)HW674, 2250)HW5290, 2251)HW5108, 2252)HW3181, 2253)HX6255, 2254)HW1120, 2255)HW1568,
2256)HW2231, 2257)HW1450, 2258)HW3686, 2259)HX5754, 2260)HW2791, 2261)HW5383.
HU6455
Article 4: (Request 3)
2245車牌應該是HV6689
Article 4: (Request 4)
51)HX6550*,52)HX7067 53)HX7118 54)HX7649*,55)HX7885
56)HX8062
金魚字
Article 5:
Re: [討論]最快的巴士(香港境內行駛)
Raymond (a1212122@netvigator.com) from yckam034015.netvigator.com at Thu Nov 26 23:13, 1998 said:
> Andy (chunyu19@netvigator.com) said:
> 如題:
新巴寶,在東廊可以行到成80至90km/h,不過新巴士都得,但因鎖了
車而唔可以咁快
Article 5: (Request 1)
> 莫探員 (trident@2themax.com) said:
>
> 九鐵VOLVO B10M.....你試過120km/h行元朗公路未??
好似城記雙層男人在北嶼開到 120KM/H以上.
b-2051
Article 6:
好'偉大'的建議.... 點解o甘好笑o既?
lv123 (wkywong@net.polyu.edu.hk) from 202.85.89.23 at Fri Nov 27 10:46, 1998 said:
re: thread 18713-114, 18713-115, 18713-116
估唔到citybus 291君為了佢提的291, 真的無所不用其極..
我就在這裡說一說他的建議中荒謬之處.
thread 18713-114
1. 最緊要一樣o野, 你開乜線都好, 無人坐都係唔得o既.
呢個係前提, 假如前提錯則結論都會錯, 相信自稱讀過pure maths.
的citybus 291君都清楚吧.
條291點'舞'都好, 香港原有景點基本不變, 旅客人數唔會因為有條
291會來香港. 即係話o甘做唔會吸引到人o既.
o既然吸引唔到人, o甘你這個提議基本上已變得無意義.
2. 嘩! 我想科大的設施連科大自己的學生也未享用, 竟要給外國遊客
用, 佩服. 我想科大學生未必讚成o番.
3. 我相信假如電視城真的可作為香港的景點, 對吸引遊客係有D幫助.
但電視城本身已是工作用, 那有空餘地方給遊客遊覽?
仲未計要山長水遠入到o黎, 唔通真的為了欣賞'陽光與海灘'?
你提議的玩樂設施若在大嶼山的話會好好多.
4. 呢張飛要收幾錢先?
估唔到蕭先生諗到o甘好的'橋'去'increasing income
from tourists, and fills the empty seats of 291, making
Citybus more profitable.' (引自thread 18713-114), 真的
佩服!
thread 18713-115
俾著我係遊客都唔駛坐40系啦! o甘近! 行路唔好?
仲有, 香港理工大學大部份的建築都係用紅磚o既! 咪以為只有香港
大學先用紅磚o既!
thread 18713-116
唔係嘛... 要人地山長水遠入去華富村? 只是為了一個新商場?
我去其他地方唔好?
真的, 我不知道你在想什麼! 如此荒謬的建議也作得出!
讀你的建議倒令我從讀書壓力中暫時釋放出來. :p
Article 6: (Request 1)
> Citybus 291 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) said:
>
> But the TVB TV City & HKUST can be developed into better tourist area, as Andrew Horner, the lecturer of COMP 104 said, HKUST is HK's 10 best tourist spot!!
>
SORRY, 電視城唔係隨便開放比各位參觀既
如果日日都有咁多遊客去, 電視台實大混亂, 節目都要拖長哂D時間至拍完
> There are quite lot of space & the sites are not occupied all the times, especiallt those of the outside sites, like Chinese Ancient Street, 1910's China scene, etc.
>
理由同上, 電視城跟本唔可以/唔可能 開放比人日日參觀
比D遊客自由走動? 鴨仔四圍遊呀?
破壞左節目進行, 邊個負責?
到時吸引埋哂D 天王迷, 日日走入電視城拎簽名, 到時就... 不堪切想
>
> But if they are placed in Lantau, then new land have to be developed & hence destroying beautiful countryside. The setting up of entertainment facilities in HK TVB is utilizing the resource & hence increase the patrongae of Citybus 291.
>
> To be determined.
> Not just new shpooing arcade, but also Aberdeen & Beaches and Waterfall Bay Golf Club, with trial golfing of 5 shoots. Tourists go from Western to Wah Fu on 47A which uses comfortable B6.
>
> Citybus 291
身為
影視及娛樂事務管理處
電視及電台廣播諮詢小組組員 既板友
怪俠一枝梅到此一遊
Article 7:
Re: [討論]最慢的巴士(香港境內行駛)(講笑)
輝仔 (c5124176@comp.polyu.edu.hk) from ip58_83.asiaonline.net at Fri Nov 27 00:02, 1998 said:
> Andy (chunyu19@netvigator.com) said:
> 如題:
80N櫥窗上的模型巴士: 車速是0km/h
Article 7: (Request 1)
應該係新巴雞鴨,中記時代行80號在東廊最盡都係40至60km/h左右
Article 8:
Re: 金躉車牌
3AV300 (kelvin@mindspring.com) from user-38ld749.dialup.mindspring.com at Thu Nov 26 22:05, 1998 said:
> 金魚 (n960@hkabc.net) said:
> 九記玩野呀!!
>
> 一係成個月唔出車,一係一個星期出十幾架!!
>
> 又黎金躉車牌啦!
>
> ATR51 HX6550 SFD111AR1WGT20325 DUPLE
> ATR52 HX7067 SFD111BR1WGT10606 ALX500
> ATR53 HX7118 SFD111BR1WGT10592 ALX500
> ATR54 HX7649 SFD111AR1WGT20326 DUPLE
> ATR55 HX7885 SFD111BR1WGT10621 ALX500
> ATR56 HX8062 SFD111BR1WGT10607 ALX500
> 出牌日期:1998年11月23日
> 請注意:ATR51,54係DUPLE
> 52,53,55,56係ALX500
>
> 全部屯門廠
>
> 金魚字
Are they all on 968?Do they have octopus?
3AV300 ^_^
Article 9:
問 781 派車
small fry (coxswain@hkabc.net) from bm.hkabc.net at Thu Nov 26 20:25, 1998 said:
最近 RT 781 一車LV 83 第二轉開8:30,
新巴是否已派 5 部車行 781?
small fry
日日都踏唔到 8:15 個班781.
Article 9: (Request 1)
又係 LV83,LV84,LV161,LV162 果四架,都無加車.
心亂如麻的......
中巴
LA24,FJ1017
Article 9: (Request 2)
不過 LV162 剛於前日退役了... 連續兩日都改派 LV34
781 依然派四架車, 第二轉的車一向即簽到即走,
而多數一車 LV83 就開 8:25-8:30 , 而 8:15 一向都無車啦 ...
智叔
新巴非空調巴士行車証
Article 10:
Re: 未上過中巴色彩的中巴...
PTC (bc_cly@stu.ust.hk) from ustsu54-nc2.ust.hk at Fri Nov 27 11:40, 1998 said:
> CMB DA82 (da82@netvigator.com) said:
> 1. DA75--一出牌就上左'渣得住'廣告,後期上左'貼住公廁'廣告...
> 2. DA76--一出牌就上左'渣得住'廣告...
>
> 仲有冇呢?
>
> 今日見到5架唔同車身/長度0既城巴VOLVO黐住行102,呆左一呆0既
> DA82,HB8095.
89年 DL o岩o岩落地o個陣都係全部DL上廣告(除o左DL3),所以到今日可能
仲有DL未上過中巴色架.
PTC
※'貼住公廁'係咩o黎o架?
Article 10: (Request 1)
仲有:
3. VA33 - 一出牌就上左'富士菲林'廣告, 之後上'Motorola傳呼機'廣告,
最後上'鷹牌鹿精'廣告直至現在.
4. VA48 - 一出牌就上左'珍寶冷氣'廣告, 之後上'sogo'廣告,
最後上'Canon IXUS'廣告, 最近仲上左'Marlboro Classic'廣告.
Article 11:
Re: 金躉行 968?
TL (awongtl@ihug.co.nz) from imscache01a.netvigator.com at Fri Nov 27 10:44, 1998 said:
> 趙雲 (deskjet@glink.net.hk) said:
>
> 可能真係我孤陋寡聞, 但係我昨日真係見有幾隻金躉攪 968 牌
> 番廠呢!
>
> 有冇人可以講一講有咩攪作呢?
係新968掛牌車黎,車頭有U廠廠徽,有好幾架呀, 應該全部都係新出牌.
Article 11: (Request 1)
咁係元廠入面 d 金躉都係囉? 我見係廠入面 d 躉未上牌架播!
Article 12:
Re: 問車: 新巴DA45
藍田站長 (jackie01@hknet.com) from hhtam025009.netvigator.com at Fri Nov 27 03:16, 1998 said:
> 輝仔 (c5124176@comp.polyu.edu.hk) said:
> 呢部車o係個零兩個月前o係薄扶林道車尾著火焚毀的. 有冇人知此車近況?
> (係整緊, 已經整好行緊, 定還是已經湯o左?)`
今日非常正常地行970,仲油埋新 Look o忝... :~)
訓訓o下醒o左,無無聊聊又上網o既藍田站長(前GB2444,FX8032)
Article 13:
Re: KMB White Trident
EK2409 (yconline@ctimail.com) from 203.80.97.182 at Fri Nov 27 10:55, 1998 said:
> RONALD(AV1)(TKT) (ryoron@hknet.com) said:
> Do boardmates know what is the fate of KMB White Trident now?(not ATR1)
今日下午去o左屯廠,見到架白躉拍o左
嚮廠出面,已經變o左金色,但係無紅線,
車頭大燈旁有九巴logo,唔知幾時出o黎行呢?
EK2409
Article 14:
Re: 有無板友可以...
Gakei! (gakei@netvigator.com) from hkpu15.polyu.edu.hk at Fri Nov 27 10:18, 1998 said:
> EK2409 (yconline@ctimail.com) said:
> ...俾一些有AL1行不同路線相o既website我?
呢度有我影o既 AL1 相, 你可以去睇睇.
Article 15:
Re: 新,九巴雞鴨一問
EK2409 (yconline@ctimail.com) from 203.80.115.64 at Thu Nov 26 23:46, 1998 said:
> Raymond (a1212122@netvigator.com) said:
> 新巴雞車有兩種:
> 1)下層尾部有一個窗口(有泵把)(例:LV15?)
> 2)下層尾部有D兩個窗口(無泵把)(例:LV1)
>
> 第1隻九巴都有,但九巴D點解係鴨車?
你所指新記果o的:
1)Duple車身o既雞
2)Alexander車身o既雞
因為九巴將Duple車身裝上部份鴨車上,
所以九巴的Duple車身係鴨車
EK2409
Article 16:
Re: [討論]最慢的巴士(香港境外行駛)
Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) from hhtam005172.netvigator.com at Thu Nov 26 23:20, 1998 said:
> Andy (chunyu19@netvigator.com) said:
> 如題:
呢個問題太難答啦
不過都可以提供意見既
試下返大陸時見到一D行長途線既巴士
車齡都相當大既
而且車速都極慢(估由30-70Km/h)
有次試過坐一架長途巴士
就行行下果陣死火。
Tony(S3M61)
(九巴)70討論區
P.S:新增電郵地址為op615221@hotmail.com
Article 16: (Request 1)
小弟就搭過百架裝有Cummins M11 engine的Van Hool客車，
行到九十六mph囉。
或者yk shum板友都可能坐過，佢行多倫多至波士頓線的，
雖則冬天摺埋左。
Article 17:
Re: 新巴ＶＡ54上了廣告.
輝仔 (c5124176@comp.polyu.edu.hk) from ip58_83.asiaonline.net at Fri Nov 27 00:06, 1998 said:
> MCW (leeootsse@ctimail.com) said:
> 今天見到己部ＶＡ上了廣告.
> 有部車有個好大男人!車頭有白色新巴LOGO,
> VA7車尾好像小了個７字?
VA54都上了廣告: 係新巴自己的橫banner少有地貼在新巴色冷馬上(通常在中
巴色熱狗上): 'This bus has ears'
Article 18:
Re: Not reasonable
Citybus 291 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from ustsu18-nc2.ust.hk at Fri Nov 27 11:10, 1998 said:
> Raymond (a1212122@netvigator.com) said:
> 近日'路線建議欄'點解咁多路線叫291?
> 1)鑽石山火葬場<->將軍墺
> 2)堅尼地城焚化爐<->和合石
> 仲有好多...........
>
Clearly, not reasonable as the route from Kennedy Town Inceniator to Wo Hop Shek should never be called as 291, but should be called as 677 as it goes from Fanling (KMB uses 7 head to number NT North Rotues.).
Citybus 291
Article 19:
Re: 'Plain' 296 vs. 91M
EK2409 (yconline@ctimail.com) from 203.80.99.134 at Thu Nov 26 20:38, 1998 said:
> 100/911R/M1 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) said:
> Today I went to Hang Hau for 3001, and then since I never
> tried the 'brand new' 296D, (being one of the Tsim Sha Tsui
> routes!) I decided to take 'plain' 296 to Sheung Tak and then
> 296D back to Tsim Sha Tsui.
>
> Then I checked the timetable and was amazed with the frequency:
> 15-25 minutes!
>
> While I was waiting, 2 691 departed (with the third one getting
> ready to depart), 2 'plain' 298 came and went by, along with
> 2 A/C 91M.
>
> I thought someone always complains about the service of 91M,
> how about 'plain 296 then?
>
> Everyone on the line (queue if you want!) at Hang Hau were waiting
> for 'plain' 296, about at least 15-20 passengers. Then at least
> another 20+ or so were waiting at Sheung Tak.
>
> Hence, I think the frequency of 'plain' 296 should be increased at
> about 7-15 minutes. Just use smaller buses like AN's (since they
> don't have much to do nowadays) or even AM's. (though not too
> good for those elderly.)
其實,我覺得296這條路線唔應該用雙層巴士
行,最好就俾專線小巴做,雙層巴士的載客量
太大,而來往尚德的人不多,用小巴真是最適
合不過了,小巴的班次亦可以密些.
Article 20:
Thread 18713
Gakei! (gakei@netvigator.com) from olkc4a149.netvigator.com at Thu Nov 26 19:07, 1998 said:
> lv123 (wkywong@net.polyu.edu.hk) said:
> 現在條thread過100, 但若想在內文中去sub-thread 105的話, 點解
> 去o左5o既?
> 係唔係一過100之後的thread no. 會自動減100?
> (如18713-109變o左18713-9)
估唔到陳年舊文仲有人講緊, 不如再有回文開過新 thread 講好過啦.
Article 21:
Re: Duple bodied Trident.
2700 (sylai@cuhk.edu.hk) from dialup1-032.csc.cuhk.edu.hk at Thu Nov 26 21:01, 1998 said:
> 100/911R/M1 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) said:
> After testing 3001 today, I've practically tested all types
> of Tridents with Duple bodies by different operators.
>
> This time I sure would give credit to KMB, as its specification
> is being the best among all the operators. Although it doesn't
> have my favourite cloth seats, most importantly, it offers the
> most seatbelts at the seats which passengers may lean forward
> in case of emergency stops. (better yet, they're three pointed)
>
> Also, there are 5-1/2 air-vents for my favourite seating position,
> which offers the best cooling system among the operators.
>
> 3001 isn't too far behind, though it has no seatbelt at all,
> and somehow I found the seats rather narrow. I wonder if anyone
> feels the same.
>
> The worst case is 2201, the interior is so dirty which reminds
> me of ex-CMB, (especially along with those Trend-tex seats, which
> somehow, seem worse than that of CMB's!) there are very few
> air vents around, thus not having enough A/C.
>
> I wonder if there is anymore Duple ATR coming? I saw one with
> HX license on 968 today!
>
> Good job to KMB this time!
>
> 100/911R/M1 Wong
九記都普躉係好正，下層用闊凳，又夠斜。
Article 22:
Re: 問車 : GK8843
eric (bching@hk.super.net) from max7-39.hk.super.net at Thu Nov 26 18:38, 1998 said:
> 32太守Jacky (jackyyng@hkschool.net) said:
> 點解S3V29呢架尾二架新狗會做左荔廠大士啤車?
> 日日行唔同線,行過31B,32,42C,48X,73X等.呢架車
> 發生過乜事?
> 由今日開始轉名為
> 32太守Jacky 的
> >it is also serves in 70S before
Article 23:
Re: 大泵巴退役日期預計
eric ching (bching@hk.super.net) from max7-39.hk.super.net at Thu Nov 26 18:49, 1998 said:
> Jacky,S3M80 (jackyyng@hkschool.net) said:
> CK牌:本月尾至下月初
> CL牌:據雞車CL1228在本年一月仲在生估計,呢批鴨會於出年一月
> 退役.
> CM牌:據雞車CM3879(解凍雞G544)最後一日行車行32B的三月廿八
> 日估計,退役時間大約為出年三月尾至四月初
> 以上只為本人估計!
the CL duck is withdrawen after 28/2/1999
except N 170 in 17/3/19999
>it will no more in 3/99!
Article 24:
Re: 新記DM躉出現英皇道?!
EK2409 (yconline@ctimail.com) from 203.80.97.182 at Fri Nov 27 11:47, 1998 said:
> 豐巴 (simong@netvigator.com) said:
> 尋晚我見到DM躉經過英皇道,但睇唔到行咩線,
> 翻查[今日特別所見]先知佢係3002,行106,
>
> 請問佢是否已落106字軌?
佢唔係106字軌,係691字軌.
> 其餘個三架仲係咪在8P和691呢?
其餘三架都嚮691度,3001-3004都係691字軌
EK2409
Article 25:
還是291嗎?
lv123 (wkywong@net.polyu.edu.hk) from 202.85.89.23 at Fri Nov 27 11:26, 1998 said:
一次過講3條threads, 費時再找.
thread 18713-117, 18713-118
我想你同意91號全程收$6.5是合理的. 反而在科大沒有分段吧.
我講過你有唔滿意請各有關機構反映, 開291不能解決問題.
這點Jess兄, Eddie Lam兄及F-Stephen兄已講得十分清楚.
客觀上講, 若只比較由科大至鑽石山的路程, $6.5係貴. 分段收費
己是一個很好的解決方法.
>> 講道德, 城巴更加無道德可言, 用你的邏輯更加唔可以俾城巴:
>> 1. 直到現在為止城巴仍未賠償給年初三車禍受難者家屬;
>> 2. 司機車品差勁, 而管理層不加以改善.
>> 3. 食言: 現在10, 77, 99, 780, 788...的服務比當初城巴所承諾的相去甚遠.
>> 4. ...
>
> 你話九巴唔道德, 從以上例子城巴更不道德吧.
>
>But do you see the cases of Citybus ocvercharging people by
>not setting sectional fares?? No. This is proved by 973, with
>sectional fares to Stanley in HK Isalnd same as 73.
我寧願俾九巴收貴我, 都唔願意坐一間由既無商業道德, 又食言的公司
辦的巴士.
唔計常盛街的話, 柴灣長命斜夠斜啦! 2200, 2500呢D城巴新車'滾水'
我聽得多, 中巴的LV, ML就未聽過喇!
關於你提議的系統:
1. 我唔知你的$50,000點計出來.
2. 巴士沒有位置安裝.
3. 就算有, 上落車已浪費不少時間
4. 假如有一個o甘正的系統, 我想輕鐵己一早研究出并用梗啦!
駛搵o甘多人查飛?
所以, 由於你的系統不可行, 所以291o甘多分段跟本不可行, 就算
可行, 司機都做唔來, 起碼記邊度分段要按鍵已吃不消.
thread 18713-119
淨係回你關於第九條問題:
>> 第九條我問o既:
>> 9. 點解由城巴做一定得? 有什麼客觀論據指出黃大仙, 慈雲山居民會
>> 坐你提議的291?
>The fare of KMB 91R is totally man eating, $9,6 for hotdogs
>(no AC buses, thus suit you). So all people would take 291
>from Wong Tai Sin to Clearwater Bay (just $6 for full AC service,
>suits me). And the population of Tsz WAn Shan + Wong Tai Sin
>is more than 100,000.
1. 乜有條91R咩?
我相信呢條係在特別日子才的線吧, 收貴D有乜O甘出奇?
2. 我講過, 一個地區有幾多人口只作參考用. 何文田夠有50,000人口,
有幾多線用何交田作終點站? 計盡只有17, 18及109咋!
3. 我重複的說, 一條線開唔開得成要睇供求, 即係有幾多人用.
深水步人口夠多啦(四十萬) 但你開條墳場線一樣無用. 道理就係O甘
簡單.
Article 25: (Request 1)
呢個問題, 只能怪你不幸, 91 無科大至鑽石山既分段
但你唔能夠話佢收貴你
舉些少例子：
1. 沙田醫院/濱景花園/沙田第一城
81c,84M,85c,86c,89c... 等, 於濱景便設分段
但680, 需到沙田第一城才有, 於濱景上車, 仍是$18.20
那麼, 你認為680 有否收貴到?
2. 64K 線
於上村甫時, 錦上路近上村的一站
於元朗時, 該站為起訖計算分段的一站
但回程時, 於對面的巴士站尚未是起訖分段的, 若乘客於站上車
便需繳付全費$7.50, 於林錦公路的一站才有$4.70的分段收費
理由大致如此, 你咁岩唔好彩, 九巴唔晌o個度開始設分段
要你坐貴車, 無辦法架喎, 一係你自己行幾步路, 去井欄樹等車囉
一係就乖乖咁坐91M
>
> 1. 乜有條91R咩?
> 我相信呢條係在特別日子才的線吧, 收貴D有乜O甘出奇?
91R 係由黃大仙至清水灣, 不過執左笠幾年啦
>
> 2. 我講過, 一個地區有幾多人口只作參考用. 何文田夠有50,000人口,
> 有幾多線用何交田作終點站? 計盡只有17, 18及109咋!
吾吾... ^_^
>
> 3. 我重複的說, 一條線開唔開得成要睇供求, 即係有幾多人用.
> 深水步人口夠多啦(四十萬) 但你開條墳場線一樣無用. 道理就係O甘
> 簡單.
某區區議會屬下既青年議員
怪俠一枝梅到此一遊
Article 25: (Request 2)
But KMB refuses to do so even this is an extremely simple thing because of lack of competition, just like the introduction of full AC on 690.
>
> 我寧願俾九巴收貴我, 都唔願意坐一間由既無商業道德, 又食言的公司
> 辦的巴士.
How about KMB? KMB said it would kill all its Chincken within 1997, but KMB killed its last Chicken in Apr 1998, later than Citybus Atlantean (24 Mar 1998).
>
> 唔計常盛街的話, 柴灣長命斜夠斜啦! 2200, 2500呢D城巴新車'滾水'
> 我聽得多, 中巴的LV, ML就未聽過喇!
>
But is it safe to use Fleetline that has no retarder to run on Chai Wan Road? Serious accident can result. But such problem does not apply to Citybus as all Citybus buses are fitted with retarders that reduces the speed at downhill.
> 關於你提議的系統:
> 1. 我唔知你的$50,000點計出來.
> 2. 巴士沒有位置安裝.
There are spaces, at the doors.
> 3. 就算有, 上落車已浪費不少時間
No time is wasted as the gates would onlt lift up is passegner want to enter the bus without paying anything or leaving the bus without inserting the ticket.
> 所以, 由於你的系統不可行, 所以291o甘多分段跟本不可行, 就算
> 可行, 司機都做唔來, 起碼記邊度分段要按鍵已吃不消.
But many sectional fares is better than none. And the system is totally computerized, so driver just need to press the button after passing through each bus stop. There is a computer screen to check if driver's pressing is right.
>
> 1. 乜有條91R咩?
> 我相信呢條係在特別日子才的線吧, 收貴D有乜O甘出奇?
>
But is this moral for KMB to slaughter holiday takers money in this way? This is especially immoral as Wong Tai Sin is an area full of pubilc housing estates and the people are poorer.
> 2. 我講過, 一個地區有幾多人口只作參考用. 何文田夠有50,000人口,有幾多線用何交田作終點站? 計盡只有17, 18及109咋!
Because most people living in Ho Man Tin are old, thus have lower transportation demand. But Tsz Wan Shan redeveloping scheme is just completed, so most people living there are young & thus have larger traffic demand.
>
> 3. 我重複的說, 一條線開唔開得成要睇供求, 即係有幾多人用.
> 深水步人口夠多啦(四十萬) 但你開條墳場線一樣無用. 道理就係O甘
> 簡單.
Again, because Sham Shui Po is an old man district and old people seldom to go to cemetery.
Citybus 291
Article 26:
(K)雞車 + Daimler F一問
PTC (bc_cly@stu.ust.hk) from ustsu54-nc2.ust.hk at Fri Nov 27 11:22, 1998 said:
請問以前2D 搬去澤安屯βo個時用o既 Daimler F 係咪由(U)廠調o黎?
當時2D 係(K)廠車還是(L)車?
跟住89年2D係用雞車的, 想問究竟係(K)廠雞還是(L)廠雞?
點解(L)廠D牌布未出現過澤安屯β同東頭屯βo既?
其實幾時(K)廠正式冇哂雞車,而其他廠正式冇哂鴨車呢?
PTC
Article 27:
(Ad) KT Inceniator Rt Board Opens!!
Citybus 291 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from ustsu18-nc2.ust.hk at Fri Nov 27 11:21, 1998 said:
Good News! Kennedy Town Inceniator Routes Suggestion Board is now opened. Please send your greatest Kennedy Town Inceniator route ideas there!
Citybus 291
Article 28:
在巴士上所遇過的傻人
DR4834 (h9810424@hkusua.hku.hk) from hkusud.hku.hk at Fri Nov 27 11:16, 1998 said:
兩年前左右 在天星坐2號熱狗返屋企
有個人跟後面上車 坐係樓上車尾 不停重複講一段野 講到我都識背!
個D咁既國民黨人 自己都唔知自己咩事 自己都跳埋落去 你不如叫埋克林頓落去
多XX餘講
成日都攪埋D咁既政治 攪埋D咁既一黨專政
公開犯法 犯左廿幾年法
黑X暗到都唔知呢個世界的存在
好人難做 好人必死
今日坐部城記970返學 又見到一個人
大聲自言自語 唉香港真是有咁多呢D人?
各位坐巴士見過類似未?
另外:什麼是'飛標' 什麼是~開頂SCANIA?
Article 29:
Endless Wonder in HKBDB!!!!
Citybus 291 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from ustsu18-nc2.ust.hk at Fri Nov 27 09:44, 1998 said:
There is endless wonder in HKBDB, as there is a series of articles that reveals the suggested bus tours. They are:
(1) The Great Star Tour on Citybus 291
(2) The Cultural Gallery on Citybus 40 series
(3) The West Coast Tour on Citybus 47A from Western to Wah Fu
Please click these tour mentioned to see the features of the tours!!
Citybus 291
Article 30:
908, the unique Volvo 11m
Citybus 291 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from ustsu18-nc2.ust.hk at Fri Nov 27 09:04, 1998 said:
Citybus 908 is a very unique Volvo Olympian 11m because of following reasons:
(1) It was the only Volvo 11m fitted with Citybus Driver Recruitment Ad on the left (until Nov 1997).
(2) It was the last franchised Citybus to have Lucozade's 20% free Ad on the right. The Ad was removed in Nov 1997, 3 months later than other franchsied buses.
(3) It was the only Volvo 11m with South China Morning Post Ad.
(4) It is the only Volvo 11m fitted with destination cloth of smaller, yet all upper case words.
(5) It is the only Volvo 11m sticked with Northwest Airlines Ad on its right side.
(6) It is the only Volvo 11m that serviced Citybus 41A, a route that goes through steep Nam Fung Road.
(7) It is the only weekday scheduled bus of Route 7.
Citybus 291
Article 31:
Route Extension of 286M, 287K & GMB 807K
299 Vigor (wkli98@netvigator.com) from eng-ser3.erg.cuhk.edu.hk at Fri Nov 27 02:47, 1998 said:
As I heard from a minibus 807K driver today, 286M & 287K will extend
to Symphony Bay after its completion.
So, 807K have to extend to Sam Pui Jiu as well to compete with 287K.
Also, a route from Symphony Bay - Tsim Sha Tsui will open.
Anyone have more info? Is that true?
Article 32:
【吹水】飛鏢飛越南山村 ^_^
炎邪火月 (hsbt@netvigator.com) from hhtck001017.netvigator.com at Fri Nov 27 01:35, 1998 said:
（原文位置忘記了！哈哈）
有板友提過見有AA經過南山村，以我所見，其實係：
自從兩條超絕廢線M1同M2兩兄弟先後去世，甩左好多前機場蛋撻出黎。
有幾架比青檸學校徵召入伍，做住青檸巴先。
前排小弟放假，經過水靜河飛的大坑東總站，就見有兩架插住路線訓練的
AA停左係度，又見另一架係大坑東道轉出黎。
（嘩！有架重係賣國泰新廣告的啦！）
同日坐車又經過大坑東，又見有AA插住訓練牌駛入大坑東道。
所以有板友見到AA駛經南山村就係。甘解啦。^_^
P.S.呢堆AA行經的路線，再加上插住路線訓練牌，唔通.....2C??? fo.O
炎邪火月
Article 33:
【網頁廣告】昔日中巴更新
CMB DA82 (da82@netvigator.com) from ntproxy1.polyu.edu.hk at Thu Nov 26 23:16, 1998 said:
昔日中巴更新的資料有：
新巴非調巴士行車証、佈景大相
（四輛ＤＳ行８號一起停泊在小西灣）
歡迎參觀！
昔日中巴網主,
DA82,HB8095.(W.T.Ho)
Article 34:
有金 Duple Trident 來上水
GZ5818 (kytse1@netvigator.com) from hhtak008121.netvigator.com at Thu Nov 26 22:21, 1998 said:
26/11/98 早上七時左右,
有一金 Duple Trident 行經上水(上水中心附近) ,
不知是否操車?
上水有無機行金 Trident?
(276P 最有機!)
GZ5818
Article 35:
有關油塘高超道巴士總站 !
Guy (guyleung@hkg.com) from ipg1-098.hkg.com at Thu Nov 26 20:12, 1998 said:
油塘高超道巴士總站於九八年十一月卅日起搬往高超道高怡村側為期二十日
於十二月尾起再搬往油塘中心附近的欣榮街,
而欣榮街亦改為單方向行駛,到時14,219P,N216及62X將由
油塘中心開出
可能是香港巴士史上在最短時間又搬得最多的巴士總站
Article 36:
Old lady appreciating SLF buses.
100/911R/M1 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) from olkc4a180.netvigator.com at Thu Nov 26 20:09, 1998 said:
Today when I was waiting for 3001 on 691, an old lady was
waiting with me.
Before the door opened, she said: 'Wow! The entrance is pretty
low!'
I said, 'Yeah! This is a new bus called SLF, it even has
a kneeling function, as well as a ramp for the handicapped!'
Hence, it doesn't take a genius to tell a SLF bus apart from
one with super high floor.
100/911R/M1 Wong
Article 37:
改乜好?
32太守Jacky (jackyyng@hkschool.net) from aquila.hkschool.net at Thu Nov 26 18:47, 1998 said:
我而家打算改字軌車討論區
但奈何仍未有新的專題討論區的構思.請大家俾下意見,乜野題材
都得,但係......有乜唔得,大家知啦!
32太守Jacky
三十二號巴士討論區
Article 38:
[討論]有巴士比賽,是禍是福????
豐田英二 (carlyle@netteens.net) from imsp039.netvigator.com at Fri Nov 27 11:45, 1998 said:
昨天,我到朋友家中看'拖頭'賽車的錄影帶.
心中有一個奇想,在歐洲將來會不會有用巴
士來比賽呢?會用什麼巴士型號呢?
會對將來的巴士是帶來好處還是懷處呢?
這又會否車廠對將來的巴士安全重視性更
大呢?
我想這些問題,只是時間才能回答罷!!!!
豐田英二
icq no. 8238165
Article 39:
銀豪踏足青衣
Joe~305 (dartchm@netvigator.com) from hhtam041052.netvigator.com at Fri Nov 27 12:51, 1998 said:
今日上午返學見唔到部VA43行948,
反而攝部銀豪(VA53,沒看錯的話).
銀豪見得多,
這亦是小弟第一次見銀豪出現青衣.
另問這是否銀豪首次來青衣??
Joe~305字
Article 40:
Why the night service N route is dear?
Maruko NWFB T101 (k5959585@hkschool.net) from aquila.hkschool.net at Fri Nov 27 13:20, 1998 said:
I want to know,why the night service N route
a fare is very expensive?
looks like
CTB rt.969 fare:$20.70
but rt.N969 fare:$31.00 very expensive.
I hope can HKBDB member give one answer me!
Thank you very much!
I will go to work now....
T101
VA51 TONG HN8481
Article 40: (Request 1)
理由好簡單:
巴士收費受《公共巴士服務條例》監管. 法例規定最高車費係幾多,
巴士公司就收幾多, 唔過 limit 就冇問題.
其實而家九巴日間路線o既冷氣價過低就真.
---
本月金句：「巴士狂熱」還您自由
Article 40: (Request 2)
> DR4834 (h9810424@hkusua.hku.hk) said:
> May be:
>
> N routes passenger number is small, therefore, more expensive to compensate.
> or bus companies make use of N routes to make more $
> (you know, al night, only bus and taxi are available, people think that bus ,although expensive, is cheaper
> than taxi, then they take bus)
But there are exceptions:
N260:$9.10(Tuen Mun <> Mei Foo)
N260<>N241:$15.00(Hung Hom <> Tuen Mun)
Daily service:$11.8
Also, LWB N-buses are the most expensive.Usually the double of daily service.
P.S:Why there are two same messages?
Article 41:
(To Ken Fung) About Route Suggestion
Citybus 291 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from ustsu18-nc2.ust.hk at Fri Nov 27 13:30, 1998 said:
I saw there are many comments on my route suggestions taht are just shouting someting like foul language. Like my route suggestion of 'Citybus 291 (cut from KMB 91 as it is losing) (ClearwaterBay - Tsz Wan Shan North)' has a comment like this and the font size is 12, over the upper limit:
大佬呀，你想整幾多個Version先安樂呀？
頒個最有創意獎給你
評分為反話
There is also a comment that is not about the route at all, in my 'Stanley Routes Rearrangement', like:
蕭巴害你 污染環境千萬里！
蕭巴服務 完全唔係路！
每一架蕭巴 都會俾人打兩巴．
你仲燒唔燒我？
一陣燒！
I hope you can cut all the comments with outsized fonts and some comments that are just personal attacks.
Citybus 291
Article 41: (Request 1)
如果你既建議係冇問題及你的形象好一點的話, 又點會有人鬧你丫?
請先想想自己的問題吧.
而 font size 方面, 我會改回 =+3.
Ken
Article 41: (Request 2)
> Alex Chan (alexki@netvigator.com) said:
> 你既然知道討論區內不可張貼font size 大過12的字, 現在你又在
> 張貼, 咁你不是也在犯板規嗎?
Sorry, it should be 6.
>
> 知法犯法者, 理應罪加一等.
>
And I am just extracting the exact phrase from other people. The font size is compared with those appeared in the comment.
Citybus 291, who always obey the board rules strictly.
Article 42:
通告 1127: 有關路線建議欄內的意見
Ken Fung (kenf@hkstar.com) from 202.68.58.226 at Fri Nov 27 13:59, 1998 said:
路線建議欄內的意見是採取不記名方法, 但給意見之餘仍然
需要守有限 font size, 禁止粗口之板規, 敬請留意.
Ken
Article 43:
Re: [投票建議]你估佢幾時'釘'?!(cut account)
32太守Jacky (jackyyng@hkschool.net) from aquila.hkschool.net at Fri Nov 27 18:07, 1998 said:
> 藍田站長 (jackie01@hknet.com) said:
> 我估一個月(會唔會長o左o的呢?)
>
> 好想佢快o的消失o既藍田站長(GB2444,FX8032)
>
> P.S.佢係邊個?!你估o下囉... :~)
雖然討論釘死一個人係唔好,仲好唔岩添!但係就本板的和平來說,
我認為佢(地)應該停下板,起碼要佢地成為番一個大學生的作為先
好!佢地成日玩小學生把戲,真係......>_<
ps:請問藍田站長可以send番個ICQ Message比我嗎? 我個Contact
唔見哂! ICQ UIN#23052957
32太守Jacky
Article 43: (Request 1)
> Gakei! (gakei@netvigator.com) said:
> 我覺得只有所有人都杯葛他，不再回應他的文章，不再提起他，
> 才能令他自討沒趣，自動消失，我想這是唯一對付他的辦法。
>
絕對同意！現在的情形，就像大家聽著一個在街上胡言亂語的精神病
患者在演講一樣．其實對於瘋言瘋語, 根本沒有分析和回應的必要．
就由得他自說自話好了．何必與其一般見識?
Article 43: (Request 2)
> Eddie Lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:
>
> 估佢幾時釘咁被動? 不如攪下簽名運動好過啦.
>
> 雖然路線建議欄果度有 D Comment 係幾惡毒, 之不過空穴來風, 未必無因,
> 造成咁o既境況都係多得呢位哥仔o者. 唔係我一個人咁諗丫, 呢度肯定好多人
> 都贊成踢走左呢位哥仔, 本板一定稍為回復太平盛世. (回復到 HKBDB 1 咁
> 就難 D.)
>
> ---
> 本月金句：「巴士狂熱」還您自由
經過考慮後,
為了不再有thread突然有很多reply出現.
我支持投票決定'佢'的生死.
(講真,真的很煩......)
(藍田站長,Patrick Manson 在哪兒?)
Article 43: (Request 3)
> 藍田站長 (jackie01@hknet.com) said:
>
> 好!一個明智o既決定 :~)
>
>
> 沙宣Rd.7號,QM直落o個條路仔... :p
>
> (P.S.咁Run Run Show係o係邊o架?!)
>
> 藍田站長(GB2444,FX8032)
係Run Run Shaw(可能打錯了,ha ha)在library對上.
(好以離了題...)
P.S:現在已到了七十幾...好快會一百...(留意HKBDB)
Article 43: (Request 4)
> Albion2 (h9728406@hkusua.hku.hk) said:
> 可能無O左佢會好好多.
> 但無O左佢會唔會悶?(又愛又恨)
傻啦,無o左佢起碼個板會清潔o的啦... :~)
(er?!hkusua?!你現時身在何方?!我o係hkucmd度... :p)
o係 HKU 其中一個Computer room度打緊 Data o既藍田站長(GB2444,FX8032)
Article 43: (Request 5)
> Albion (PSKY) (h9714900@hkusua.hku.hk) said:
> 我和他在Run Run Shaw Room 103
我一個人o係Patrick Manson Building Room 214(得閑過o黎搵我啦 ^_^)
o岩o岩打晒o的 Data o既藍田站長(前GB2444,FX8032)
Article 43: (Request 6)
都未必咁難，連DL都淡出本板，而家得返「此人」，踢走佢以後，個
板變返做HKBDB1並非難事。
在此，我非常理解那些針對此人的人(尤其是BusBus兄)，就好比我有
一個姓馬既同學，煩足我三年，每一次我都頂唔順要同佢死過。我估
板友們對「此人」的心境應是差不多。
（我從來都未試過用同學做板務例證，而家攪成咁，證明本板已有一
些跟我與同學的關係差不多的事件，亦即是本板的紛爭很嚴重，但事
件嚴重，解決卻易（參看上文）。在此奉勸大家：「忍一時風平浪靜
，退一步海闊天空」）
野比大雄
Article 43: (Request 7)
這固然係一個好辦法,但我覺得最好最萬全的做法係益佢一個月板假
,流放佢返去果個291巴士討論區,最多咪得閑去果度探佢囉!
Article 43: (Request 8)
話時話，我都好同意wing kit君的說法。(未肯定你是男
是女之前，用『君』比用『兄』穩陣，請勿見怪！^_^)
唔知係我道行未夠深，定係該位仁兄教而不善、屢勸不
聽，(我始終相信前者居多)，當本星期見佢一次又一次
咁響路線建議檔不停貼有關2X1的文時，唔怕老實講，
我真係覺得自己失敗，甚至有自殺傾向，覺得好言相勸
佢都唔多聽，依然故我，我真係唔知點面對自己……
不過諗深一層，正如Wing Kit君所講，由他繼續說好了
吧！反正他又不是我的學生。我也不應該對他諸多批評
的。心中安樂了不少……
近來心情不太好，可能有些借題發揮，不過點都好，多
謝咁多位花時間入這篇文聽我發牢騷。
覺得自己好失敗的
LX253
v_v
Article 44:
傻啦^_^
Joe~305 (dartchm@netvigator.com) from hhtam040202.netvigator.com at Fri Nov 27 19:34, 1998 said:
> 32太守Jacky (jackyyng@hkschool.net) said:
> 首先我想向板主講聲對不起.我未想過當天建議投票設立本欄,
> 而本欄的成立會惹來這麼多的非議.
> 我現在想向板主建議暫停本欄的貼文板,因為就某巴291的建議
> (廢又好,有用又好)惹來本板太多麻煩.
> 請板主慎重考慮本建議.
豈非為一棵樹放棄一個森林,傻啦^_^.
何況這裏有頗多好提議,係咪?
291,291,291......[人巨]就係棵小樹啦
Joe~305字
Article 44: (Request 1)
係囉... 此舉豈非禁止所有路線建議?
Article 45:
Re: 問:有幾多銀豪'炒'過?
T.P.T. (dckk@netteens.net) from ntproxy1.polyu.edu.hk at Fri Nov 27 18:28, 1998 said:
> Albion2 (h9728406@hkusua.hku.hk) said:
> VA63是不是?還有無其他的?
中巴意外撞毀 / 1998年3月31日 (VA60)
雙層巴入啟德削去頂層 / 1998年7月4日 (VA63)
.....
T.P.T.
Article 45: (Request 1)
> 藍田站長 (jackie01@hknet.com) said:
>
> 1.VA63 -- 行A20,o係機場玩'開頂'
> 2.VA60 -- 行691,o係鯉魚門Rd.中'頭獎'
>
> 藍田站長(GB2444,FX8032)
唔怪得VA63是藍色窗啦.今日佢行970呀.
Article 45: (Request 2)
> 藍田站長 (jackie01@hknet.com) said:
>
> o下?!行970?!幾點鐘呀?!唔見o既?!
>
> 今朝坐部DA90(都係行970),o係薄扶林Rd.連過三架Volvo,
> 結果35 min.就由旺角去到QM,難得早返o既藍田站長(GB2444,FX8032)
9:15 at WHT bus stop.And it is FULL.
Article 45: (Request 3)
我今日3點鐘在旺角都見佢係行970.
Article 46:
Re: 新Cityflyer
華人 (ypy@hk.super.net) from max3-5.hk.super.net at Fri Nov 27 19:51, 1998 said:
> CTB12 (majac@netvigator.com) said:
>
>
> 今日到巴鼠世界，有新Cityflyer賣，價錢為 $240，這車有別於之
>
> 前A11,變成A21,地點係紅墈車站，車隊編號2112，同埋冇左兩行英文
>
>
>
> P.S 老細話他會係 '啟德繽紛墟' 擺擋，逢五、六、日，至到一月三日
>
唔係廿碼,咁平.
我買要$310喎(A11 HS6714)
搬了網址的華人上
Article 46: (Request 1)
> 華人 (ypy@hk.super.net) said:
>
> 唔係廿碼,咁平.
> 我買要$310喎(A11 HS671
因為冇証書
Article 46: (Request 2)
呢款既包裝同之前果款有冇唔同?
eriC MB7
Article 47:
Re: 新巴新訓練車T102!!!!!
華人 (ypy@hk.super.net) from max3-5.hk.super.net at Fri Nov 27 19:27, 1998 said:
> LF272(BV9450) (victory2@netvigator.com) said:
> 話說今日小弟行經灣仔（軒官附近），見到新巴T102!
> 車牌：EF5328(前新巴DL10)
舊聞o黎喎.我上個星期日己經見到(o向小西灣)
Article 47: (Request 1)
> Gakei! (gakei@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 不知如果他日新巴用了另一款車來做訓練車，
> 編號會是‘T10乜’還是‘T20乜’?
上兩個星期日見到柴廠有部 MC 被改為訓練車, 編號是 T104.
正尋覓愛車 (MB7) 的
eriC
Article 48:
解決方法
Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) from hhtam005151.netvigator.com at Fri Nov 27 14:58, 1998 said:
> alex chung (97480358@plink.cityu.edu.hk) said:
> (這是我第一次搭93K)
> 昨天(26/11)17:14,我在旺角KCR上93K,
> 一出太子道就塞,17:30到彌敦道,
> 18:00到彩虹,18:25到將軍澳道,在寶琳道塞到死,
> 19:02下車了事.
>
> 該車在佐敦已客滿,土瓜灣落返D,九龍城後頂閘
>
> 彌敦道(旺角)上車到將軍澳道要55分鐘(沒有塞車),
> 估計入到康盛要70分鐘(60X彌敦道(旺角)入屯門只須50分鐘),
> 實在太長!!!!
>
> 我建議:
> 93K過九龍城上觀塘繞道,估計可省回15分鐘,
> 入康盛要55分鐘,比較合理,及 更具吸引力.
> 93A改往黃大仙(不入觀碼),加車加班次
查實既然297改為全日行走，倒不如將293P改為全日行走
再唔係將293P改以九龍城做終點站。
有左呢D既改變，如果由土瓜灣去將軍澳都有車行，咁93K
可以改經亞皆老街、太子道東、觀塘繞道同寶琳道，咁樣
可以節省行車時間，而且又可以避過九龍城同埋彌敦道一
帶塞車。
至於彌敦道(指佐敦至旺角一帶)往將軍澳可改搭95，順便
將95延長至坑口北就可以喇。
Tony(S3M61)
(九巴)70討論區
Article 48: (Request 1)
弊在九巴似當了93K是百搭寶,是土瓜灣和觀塘的連繫之一,即是14,
15的輔助系,所以以前它們都停同一站的.(未必這麼容易改動)
假若要93K行觀塘繞道,就可能令往來兩地的人不便了.
雖然,293P可改全日,但不應在九龍城,而是盛德街或紅磡碼頭一帶,
因為不單方便將軍澳居民,最重要的是中途客需要.
(冇了5K,13K等線有時對太子道東一帶往紅磡是不便的)
我記得我以前都說過,九巴在95年已想將95搬往坑口北,93K改翠林或
康盛,行隧道,但後來計劃不知為何無疾而終.
Article 48: (Request 2)
293P 家陣都係係用 93K o既車咋. 而家邊度仲有咁多 AV 養起一條線?
我自己雖然贊成 93K 改行觀塘繞道, 但係實行上就要諗定一套完善o既計劃
作配合. 例如要等到車源充足, 周詳研究重組計劃等.
坑口北冇坑啦. 除左擺街同寶琳外, 成個將軍澳暫時都冇地方擺車.
---
本月金句：「巴士狂熱」還您自由
Article 49:
Re: 新巴十米一Dart仔SLF幾時會到？
橙色一個巴 (moi3698tommy@ctimail.com) from mp1348.hknet.com at Fri Nov 27 20:14, 1998 said:
> LF272加德士 (victory2@netvigator.com) said:
> 有冇人知新巴十米一Dart仔SLF 大約幾時到？
99年1--2月前到
橙色一個巴
Article 50:
Re: 2200發生乜事
Raymond (a1212122@netvigator.com) from hhttnt02181.netvigator.com at Fri Nov 27 19:33, 1998 said:
> Louis (louis@hkabc.net) said:
> 今晚大約六時四十分經過灣仔碼頭, 見到城巴2200泊左o係度, 前後
> 有三架工程車(包括富豪大拖車)泊夾住, 再要加多兩架城巴貨van!
>
> 嘩! 有冇人知乜事咁大陣象?
架2200琴日已經有D問題,行車時發出'池池'聲,我在家大約
一個鐘就聽到一次(佢經過我屋企樓下),可能要入廠修理一陣
希望2200能夠繼續服務8X既Raymond
Article 51:
Re: 請問龍運巴三叉戟模型是否仍未推出?
Hanvas 漢 華 (hanvas@netvigator.com) from hhtam005146.netvigator.com at Fri Nov 27 19:40, 1998 said:
> William (william2@ihug.co.nz) said:
>
> 請問龍運巴三叉戟模型是否仍未推出?
暫 時 尚 未 有 消 息 指 龍 運 會 出 三 叉 戟 模 型 .
Article 52:
Re: 新城巴躉冇証書
lazyman (leolee80@netvigator.com) from hhtam041019.netvigator.com at Fri Nov 27 19:07, 1998 said:
> lazyman (leolee80@netvigator.com) said:
> 今 日 買 了 兩 架 城 躉 只 係 一 佰 十 元
> 原 '李' 來 冇 証 書
今日又有新Cityflyer啦！今次改為行走A21,Fleet NO.2112
showing the destination hung hom KCR
兩 架 城 躉 係 360 ,sorry wrong typing b4!!
Article 53:
Re: (討論)巴士行車時間
橙色一個巴 (moi3698tommy@ctimail.com) from mp0832.hknet.com at Fri Nov 27 17:19, 1998 said:
> R Lai (raymansc@asiaonline.net) said:
> 我貼文都有o下, 今次o黎條討論問題.
> 有部份路線行車時間勁長, 在總站泊好多車.
> 但有部分路線在總站經常無車, 未必表示沿途塞車.
> 只不過行車時間不足.
>
> 各位板友, 請提出邊o的路線有以上問題吧.
>
> 九巴 93K 經常見到在寶琳總站泊超過五部車, 間中就十部(跨張)
> 九巴 70, 70X 前者短, 後者長, 在上水總站
> 70 永遠無車(多數有都不過一部)
> 70X 隨時泊多過五部.
> 當然啦, 有冇理由70迂迴曲折, 70X一條大直路.
> 70 行車時間只長過70X5分鐘
> 九巴 21兩邊總站都泊好少車, 好多時無車.
>
> 我仲知好多, 但等大家講.
> 請大家follow up...
其實巴士公司計行車時間係包括上落客的時間,司機休息
或者食飯時間,同容許的交通阻塞時間,例如隧巴線就有計
海隧塞車要塞的時間.好似上述例子,70的單頭係出九龍唔夠,
但係入新界就非常夠,因為我見70係佐敦個邊經常有超過一架
泊係度.唔知係咪九記想的車係九龍個邊,以備不時之需?
橙色一個巴
Article 54:
城記1號上o左標準城巴車身
華人 (ypy@hk.super.net) from max3-5.hk.super.net at Fri Nov 27 20:04, 1998 said:
如題
搬了網址的華人上
Article 55:
城記788浪費資源?
Raymond (a1212122@netvigator.com) from hhttnt02181.netvigator.com at Fri Nov 27 19:26, 1998 said:
今日15:30在柴灣永泰道見到架788(681)出中環,到上東廊
前最後一個站都係得二十至三十個乘客,究竟788有無需要
開全日,就算開全日,非繁時又有無需要行12米車?
覺得城記788有D浪費資源既Raymond
Article 56:
資料糾正--1973年嶼巴意外
Kwan (sfac3a09@netvigator.com) from imscache01a.netvigator.com at Fri Nov 27 19:21, 1998 said:
上日有人講開嶼巴件意外,我在看舊報紙後有以下資料:
發生日期: 22/7/1973
時間; 2:30pm
地點:大嶼山羌山道
死傷:17死23傷
部車係個腳制有事因而落了300呎的山.
P.S. 邊個在板話部車出事於13/7 害到我找了一個月報紙底片.
Article 57:
E34,N30
269B (cmlai@hknet.com) from mp1919.hknet.com at Fri Nov 27 18:25, 1998 said:
今日見到E34又用3AD,又用水塘豪(Long Win),點解?
E30又用咩車?
Article 58:
今日比九巴31M激死我!!
32太守Jacky (jackyyng@hkschool.net) from aquila.hkschool.net at Fri Nov 27 17:50, 1998 said:
今日放學後,冇哂散紙,所以想搭31M+32M比八仔返
屋企.架DF781埋站,以為冇死啦!點知個八仔機比
塊'裹屍布'包住,上唔到車,走去'搶'散紙搭32啦.
之後架CM1845埋站,真係......點解31M會咁架?!
今日終於上到久違了的S3M80返屋企!
Article 59:
未上過城巴色彩的城巴
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) from drayan.upnaway.com at Fri Nov 27 17:28, 1998 said:
究竟有哪些呢﹖大家想想吧﹗
P.S. 要開始執行李了﹗^_^
Article 60:
城記又有新CITYFLYER模型啦！
LF272(BV9450) (victory2@netvigator.com) from yckam036043.netvigator.com at Fri Nov 27 20:14, 1998 said:
城記今日又有新Cityflyer啦！今次改為行走A21,Fleet NO.211?
但是無上次'The smart connection to the new Hong Kong International Airport'
果排文字，正在巴X細界賣緊啦！大約＄２４０咁上下.
Article 61:
1998巴士全車身廣告選舉-誠徵
Jess (c5013830@hkbu.edu.hk) from proxy131.hkbu.edu.hk at Fri Nov 27 14:28, 1998 said:
看了18988-1的文章, 想起一些事, 亦想搞一些事.
誠徵:識整網上投票表格的人仕, 有就最好整在網頁上, 不會令本版
負荷過大.
以前B會都有攪D咁樣的選舉, 我都有一張相上過頭十名.
不過見今年到現在都未徵稿,都係唔攪多!又無左張海報喇!
不如今日小弟將所有侯選名單寫下來, 讓各位選擇.
全車身廣告系列:(1998上畫-有漏請補)
商場精選:慈雲山中心[黃色版-九巴;藍色版-冠忠];富東商場;青衣城
樓盤廣告;新都城第二期[紫色];牽晴間;新寶城;南豐廣場;御豪山莊;百仕達花園
防止罪案:齊滅罪*(3N23);慎防盜賊*(S3N238);子女好與壞(偷野M19;LV23)
交通安全:超速駕駛(S3M118);胡亂轉線(S3BL32);跟車太貼(S3BL84)
銀行廣告:寶生五十週年(AL83/101-6C);亞洲商業樓宇貸款(3N149);
國華(灰色-LF142;白色-AD211);金城銀行(AD94);Yes! UA財務(AD202)
廣安銀行(住得好-DA36;儲蓄-AD224;紅綠色-ML44);
鹽業銀行(紫色1-AD344;紫色2-AL54;住屋貨款-AD52;儲蓄存款-S3N142)
政府/社會團體廣告:
因工受傷(ME22);防止山火*(S3N154);靈實醫院(3N141);綠色生活(S3BL426)
聯合國兒童之友(370);廉政公署(防貪-DA67;辦事處-S3N227;青年-S3N133)
香港是我家(LA21);學校社工(212);樂施會(342);微笑行動(412);臨市局(ADS43)
保護環境(S3M56-44);做義工(S3N210,S3M72)宣明會兒童助養(S3N358)
其他:
三號幹線郊野公園段
奇勝牌插頭(3N99-9;1A/63X那款)
林淦生藥物(1A-3N115)
Hilti電鑽-扭力勝龍捲(3N128-6C,831-8X)
Sunday(AM161)
南豐早報(ADS9)
長榮航空(AD304)
好易通(白色-AV140;白紫色-3AV115;橙黃色-S3N333)
錦囊IXUS(VA48)
Marlboro Classics(AD215)
西門子(健康;工業;電腦;電話;電力)
十大愛心之星98
米芝蓮車呔(AV24)
加德士(能源咭-AV121;機油-3AV29)
Seagate硬盤(藍色-AV114)
東芝電器(DVD機-3AD127;影印機-3AV42)
1998虎年(3AD52)
健力寶-無限動力(3AV9)
獅王植物物語(3AV103)
國泰-(航運中心-腳/箭/舥/機頭;直航-北美/伊斯坦堡/倫敦/溫/多/洛/紐約)
機場購物中心(藍色)
好彩酒樓(黃色-龍運)
煤氣煮飯寶
通成廣告
AC Delco(AD248)
*為重上廣告
Article 62:
[廣告]巴士攪攪震開張
璁巴集團 (miketal@hkstar.com) from 202.82.245.233 at Fri Nov 27 14:24, 1998 said:
巴士攪攪震
歡迎貼文
巴士攪攪震 happy勁夠fun
Article 63:
Re: 新/中巴鴨行過隧道線未?
LA11 Shing (b493332@hkstar.com) from 202.82.245.233 at Fri Nov 27 20:30, 1998 said:
> Raymond (a1212122@netvigator.com) said:
> 如題
>
> Thanks
LV149 0係最初 R.110 開線0個陣行過0架喇 .
By LA11 Shing (^_^) (^_^)
Article 63: (Request 1)
我講鴨喎,係DS,唔係LV呀
另:有無板友知DS14去左邊?
Article 63: (Request 2)
行過!!!以前104特車(即中環--旺角)有用DS20
請接力
橙色一個巴
Article 63: (Request 3)
01.) 以前104特車(即中環--旺角)有用DS20
02.) 幾年前 606 有數部字軌 DS
eriC
Article 64:
問路:旺角 , 何文田(中文and Eng. version)
GZ5818 (kytse1@netvigator.com) from hhtak009129.netvigator.com at Fri Nov 27 21:05, 1998 said:
我的一位女同學明天(28/11 , 6:30 pm )要到何文田某地方參加
演講比賽 , 但不知那地方叫什麼名?
只知由旺角金聲戲院的小巴總站搭小巴到何文田總站 ,
再行過斜坡便到.
請問旺角金聲戲院的小巴去何文田那個地方?
而該小巴何文田總站附近有那所可供演講比賽的地方(如中學)?
謝謝!
萬分感激!
GZ5818
My classmate have to go to one place in Ho Man Tin
to take part in Speech Competition.
But she doesn't know what place it is.
She just knows , taking minibus in Mongkok Golden Shing
Cinema ( Fa Yuen Street ) to terminus in Ho Man Tin ,
and then walk to this place by passing through a slope
in Ho Man Tin.
Can you help her?
Thanks x 1000000 !
GZ5818
Article 64: (Request 1)
> EK2409 (yconline@ctimail.com) said:
>
> 上斜坡定落斜坡?
>
>
> 何文田巴士總站對面.
>
> EK2409
上斜坡.
Thanks!
GZ5818
Article 64: (Request 2)
> Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 果D小巴應該去何文田109巴士總站
> 以前我都坐過
> 半小時可到
>
> 而附近有三間中學
> 即華英,陳瑞祺喇沙及丘佐榮中學
> 其中一間就係喇
仲有我讀o個間開平中學!
EK2409
Article 65:
邊條通宵巴士線最少人坐?
豐巴 DM12 (simong@netvigator.com) from olkc5a161.netvigator.com at Fri Nov 27 20:40, 1998 said:
如題 (特別節日除外)
是否N8X呢?
豐巴
Article 66:
Re: 夢想可成真...
T.P.T. (dckk@netteens.net) from hkpa05.polyu.edu.hk at Fri Nov 27 21:53, 1998 said:
> VA36 (kchojbl@school.net.hk) said:
> 一 切 從 新 開 始 ！ VA54兩邊側面現已貼上橫額
無門o個面係 'This bus has ears'
Article 66: (Request 1)
今日佢行o羊線呀?
EK2409
Article 67:
有關路線建議欄的一切之我見
MC1 (n7136579@netvigator.com) from hhttnt01050.netvigator.com at Fri Nov 27 21:33, 1998 said:
路線建議欄自在早前啟用後,對HKBDB引發了很多問題,
單單打打,無聊建議,食蛋天王等已是小事,最大問題還是
嚴重影響本板秩序.
早在上月,兩位板友已在本板內單單打打,你罵我時我又罵你,
可謂「目中無人(Ken Fung)」,結果攬到本板秩序大亂.
尤其是當Kenf工作繁重時更在本板內「一日打十次」,
造成「民不聊生」(誇大).
當各板友投票要設立路線建議欄,相信各位也沒有留意到
這個路線建議欄竟有這麼大的威力.在路線建議欄設立後,
本是沒甚麼大問題,但是當某城10路線為名的板友提出了
某路線及某地區的路線建議及路線重整後,問題便發生了.
路線建議欄成為了這位板友和其它板友的戰場,當這位板
友一提出建議時其它板友就大力炮轟,立竿見影.短短時
間內這位板友便吃了很多的「蛋」.
後來,一直和這位板友單單打打的另一位板友也轉到了在
路線建議欄內發炮,繼而在本板內張貼文章,互數對方的不
是.不幸的不是這兩位板友,而是不幸地捲入了這兩位板友
的單單打打的其它板友,四人被罰停板,竟然以上兩位也沒份.
而要其它板友來承擔他們一切的罪過.
近日,這兩位板友和其它板友又再單單打打,大作所謂「科大→
某墳場或某大焚化爐」的建議,先不論這些建議有沒有真正
用途,但這些建議已令不少板友吃不消,甚至忍不住而做出不
當行為.
好像以前的91K,Aqua,Dennis Lau一樣,他們都曾做出影響本
板秩序的不當行為(可能有點錯相,Sorry),但他們也能知錯
能改,變回正常板友一名,但是這兩位板友不但沒有任何慚愧,
而且絲毫沒有改過的行動(尤其是某城10路線為名的板友).
相信各板友也不想本板一而再,再而三地停板,但是如果再
這樣下去,最終也只是死路一條的.我寫這篇文的目的,並
不是要點名指責某些板友,而是從而建議各板友不要再這
樣幹下去,請各位反省一下,吸取教訓,這樣和平共處才能
令本板聲明提高,做得更好的.
對於此次事件竟然有兩位本校校友參與或受害而感到愕然的
MC1
Article 68:
徵求--各嚴重巴士意外或大事的日期
Kwan (sfac3a09@netvigator.com) from imscache01a.netvigator.com at Fri Nov 27 21:58, 1998 said:
本人欲找各大型巴士意外或大件事,由1960至今.
如有的話可否提供確實時間地點好讓我找報紙.
有剪下的話也可以借給我,謝謝!
