19980919




Articles on 19th September, 1998.

Today's Articles: 103!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Articles' Numbers: (19980820_01-103)





Article 1:

輕鐵十年紀念--輕鐵巴士/新界西北巴士演變


大腦電波 (leungtam@hknet.com) from 202.67.235.124 at Fri Sep 18 16:13, 1998 said:


今日係輕便鐵路通車十週年紀念.


今日講下輕鐵通車以來,新界西北區巴士演變.





1988年9月18日--輕鐵通車.九巴取消以下路線.


55 元朗東 -- 流浮山


56 大棠 -- 元朗工業村


59 大興 -- 屯門碼頭(改由輕鐵開辦,直至507線通車日)


61 屯門碼頭 -- 元朗東


61A 屯門市中心 -- 元朗東


62 青山灣 -- siu康


63 友愛南 -- 元朗東


以下小巴路線取消


47 友愛 -- 山景


輕鐵開設以下巴士路線


520 屯門碼頭 -- 龍鼓灣


521 井財街 -- 大欖


559 青山灣 -- siu康(已經取消)


655 元朗東 -- 流浮山


656 大棠 -- 元朗工業村


657 洪水橋 -- 廈村


670 元朗 -- 朗屏村


輕鐵亦於同日設立輕鐵專區.範圍包括整個屯門元朗區.


所有由九龍開出的巴士祗准在屯門元朗區下車,不准上車.


所有由屯門元朗區開出的巴士,在區內祗准上車,不准落車.


此專區遭居民及議員反對,輕鐵於1992年取消輕鐵專區.


1992年


輕鐵開653及654兩線,來往元朗及天水圍.該兩線於輕鐵天水圍支線


通車後取消.





歡迎補充及討論





請問以下資料


A59,A58,及A71的開辦日期


559取消日期


Article 1: (Request 1)

56 元朗西---大棠(黃泥墩)


61是往元朗西的


92年2月(屯門東北支線通車後取消)





初時的輕鐵接駁巴士是這樣的


520 屯門碼頭 -- 龍鼓灣


521 屯門市中心-- 大欖


559 青山灣 -- 兆康(已經取消)


655 元朗 -- 流浮山


656 元朗---大棠


657 元朗循環線


658 元朗 -- 凹頭


670 元朗 -- 朗屏村





另由輕鐵接辦的九巴線除59,59B外還有61


Article 1: (Request 2)

61A唔係由蝴蝶村/屯門碼頭開?我記得就係啦,曾經用過3M添,還上了


正X丸廣告.


另外環有K1X同K2X


K1X開頭用過FUSO旅遊巴,之後行B10M同MCW9.7米(我見過一次),MP618


(編號318),近排行過Volvo 11m(PLAXTON)


K2X就開頭用MCW,現在行Volvo B10M同Volvo 11m,之前行過318同旅遊


巴.


講真果句,318好正呀


Article 1: (Request 3)

對!我以前返學常見到這部車(3M3).當時叫蝴蝶村


還有一條59B(兆康苑--蝴蝶村),亦曾在晚年用九鐵巴士行走





61至晚期時正確路線為:屯門市中心--元朗西


F-stephen


Article 1: (Request 4)

以前蝴蝶村巴士總站係於現在的啟豐園,巴士手冊第四集內有九鐵巴


士行59B相





以前和現在都住蝴蝶灣區的DY2528


Article 2:

Re: 城記越來越離潽!


MCW (leeootsse@ctimail.com) from 203.80.101.54 at Fri Sep 18 19:02, 1998 said:


> 634 (ccheung8@asiaonline.net) said:


> Since rt.10 交給城巴後,rt.10的乘客給城巴趕走了,


> 首先: 班次疏,繁忙時間都要等約15min.一班;


> 2 : 車舊,常用蚊滋車( Leyland 12m 3xx )&


> 小強車(大富豪 4xx), 甲一籮滿! 令乘客非常不滿


> Finally, 今日18/9 還用猛男1531,1551走,很是離潽!


> 唉!~ POOR CTB!!!


780都要等約20min.一班;(pm19:35)到先有一班車,


城巴好,好到你乘唔到?


Article 2: (Request 1)

唉 .... 其實某巴士公司唔壞多幾架車擺0係


條街0個度 , 已經好好0架喇 , 仲邊度要求


到佢咁多呢 ? 有車俾你搭已經算唔錯喇 .





By LA11 Shing (^_^) (^_^)


Article 3:

Re: 中記的CX去了哪兒?不是賣給新記嗎?


MCW (leeootsse@ctimail.com) from 203.80.101.54 at Fri Sep 18 18:32, 1998 said:


> Mr. Bean! (cityman@netteens.net) said:


> 如題





中巴保留自用


Article 4:

東區巴士路線建議


KSMBH ADS9 (shumky@netvigator.com) from hhtck011123.netvigator.com at Fri Sep 18 18:18, 1998 said:


東區巴士路線建議


新線2X 筲簊灣-灣仔碼頭全日訂走


經耀興東,西灣河太古城上東區走廊跟8P至灣仔碼頭.


為耀興東太古城及筲箕灣居民提供往返銅鑼灣特快巴


士服務.(720,722東行銅得灣無站)





新線81B 小西灣>勵德村


晨早開數班,經翠灣,杏花上東區走廊至太古經英皇道,百褔


道上寶馬山聖貞德後沿108往勵德村


小西灣有不少學生往寶馬山上學.經太古城及魚則魚涌


可疏導上唔到529學生及方便太古城學生無需行出康


怡搭車..經百褔道上山避免與27,529重複.





改動88


照現行路線至西灣河太安樓上東區走廊至永興街出英


皇道沿怡和街軒尼詩道至菲林明道出灣仔北返原線往


中環.


原興華乘客可改乘81往銅鑼灣原線,


原杏花乘客可改乘85往北角原線.


此改動可為筲簊灣西灣河提供往銅鑼灣特快巴士服務,


並減少與20,M21重複.


但也可能會延長往中環銅鑼灣乘客行車時間.





延長18為西環至魚則魚涌116站


太古坊及上環一帶的商業大廈越建越多,延長18可方便


兩區上班人士並作為來往東西區之主要路線.





延長42或38至太古城


現時田灣以西之港島南區沒有巴士往北角以東,


延長可方便太古坊上班人仕





歡迎討論,請勿罵戰!


Article 4: (Request 1)

呢幾項我都幾支持,不過81B就有o的保留,個人始終覺得行長命斜會


好過經杏花村。





88咁行法,亦可以代替720行全日。


不過太古城無位(同埋唔俾擺),如果唔係21號都唔會做o左循環線。


Article 5:

為何要換車?


adrianlo (adrianlo@netvigator.com) from hhtam022033.netvigator.com at Fri Sep 18 19:21, 1998 said:


>adrianlo(adrianlo@netvigator.com)said


>為什麼新記Rt.113要用巨鷹(MCW 12米),在九龍城太子道西轉入聯合


道時,是十分困難.


Article 5: (Request 1)

Does 巨鷹 mean ML?


Article 6:

九記邊D線要CUT俾城記做?


L. Verde (gw7112li@netvigator.com) from hhtam021240.netvigator.com at Fri Sep 18 19:13, 1998 said:


有好多板友對九記都頗有意見, 例如:


1. 好多線(如12A,城隧線)一架冷馬都冇


2. 好多線(如113,606)唔用十一/十二米車


3. 屯門公路線唔跟城記轉12米


4. 690唔跟城記轉全冷


5. 將軍澳一扑鎚起地鐵, 九記即刻唔願開新線


6. 九記唔買單層新車


.....





加上港島巴士服務(如10, 780, 788等線)由九月起「大躍進」, 睇怕大家都認為,





城記係九龍同新界市民o既大救星!





請問各位, 運豬局應該要cut邊D九記路線俾城記做呢?





或者, 有乜o野方法去改善九龍同新界o既巴士服務?





凱日‧豪原


Article 6: (Request 1)

大躍進?塞死英皇道就叫大躍進!?


到時又唔知又多幾多條英皇道lu


不如說,'運豬局應該要cut邊D城記路線俾九記做呢'?





九記唔錯o丫,班次密(有一半的線)又准(又有一半)





我唔想引起罵戰的,我只是以我的觀點看吧了,


如果o甘唔好彩,我會負責的.





MAN


Article 7:

新記會否淘汰所有舊車?


adrianlo (adrianlo@netvigator.com) from hhtam022033.netvigator.com at Fri Sep 18 18:43, 1998 said:


>adrianlo (adrianlo@netvigator.com)said


>如題


Article 7: (Request 1)

熱狗就乜都淘汰,唔理是新定舊,


冷馬就唔知啦,不過本人預測,


有排都唔會啦!





MAN


Article 8:

新模型


Ben Hung (b9503009@ln.edu.hk) from 202.67.234.31 at Fri Sep 18 18:05, 1998 said:


九巴丹拿A,車牌4202,賣$265有九折.





另今日在紅磡見到DC7行115,新巴,


你係得0既.


Article 9:

龍運AN


大埔居民 (makhome@netteens.net) from imsp013.netvigator.com at Fri Sep 18 16:18, 1998 said:


請問有冇人知道龍運AN會在何時投入服務?


?





大埔居民


Article 10:

83X全冷


DL (ss78k@netteens.net) from imsp013.netvigator.com at Fri Sep 18 20:13, 1998 said:


83X全冷,由28/9/1998起!





DL


Article 11:

[討論] 談九鐵巴士 K1X & K2X 的命運!


巴士喬 (briankiu@netvigator.com) from hhtck004161.netvigator.com at Fri Sep 18 20:13, 1998 said:


九鐵巴士 K1X & K2X 開辦已有五年多,客量逐漸增加,


而車款亦有多次更改。但在西鐵於2003年啟用後,


這兩線巴士會取消嗎?





歡迎討論!





搭 K1X 返學的巴士喬


S3BL266 - DY2719 (KMB,59M)


Article 12:

CX (and the other 2 VA's)


100/911R Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) from 24hrlab-221.sfsu.edu at Fri Sep 18 20:09, 1998 said:


Where are the CX's and VA64 and VA? that belongs to CMB now?





Does anyone have any idea which non-franchise route will CMB start and when?





100/911R Wong


Article 13:

新巴為失明人士推出凸字巴士手冊


大腦電波 (leungtam@hknet.com) from 202.67.255.31 at Fri Sep 18 20:06, 1998 said:


新巴為失明人士及視力障礙的人士推出凸字乘車手冊.該手冊厚140頁


,裡面有新巴路線資料.





新巴正打算推出凸字路線牌.





(以上係有線放眼社區節目報導)





我認為新巴較其他巴士公司照顧乘客的需要,希望新巴盡早更換舊車,


及其他公司為有需要人士推出手冊及特別服務.





--------------------------------------------


如果電腦軟件問題  歡迎在此發問討論


Cyber-X 電腦軟件討論區


news://news.cyber-x.com.hk/computer.software


Article 14:

LF


DA74 (c3035083@hkstar.com) from 202.40.137.101 at Fri Sep 18 20:01, 1998 said:


Why I saw some CMB LF leave the bus services (ed:LF222,


in the late Augest and then parked in CMB depots .I have they


will died very soon.However I saw those LF a few day ago and


they serviced again.


Do anyone know what's matter?


Article 15:

城記邊D線要CUT俾新記做?


LV123 (95155644d@polyu.edu.hk) from hkpa05.polyu.edu.hk at Fri Sep 18 19:57, 1998 said:


如題, 請討論.


Article 16:

Re: 九記講大話!


三叉戟‧ATR1 (trident@powernethk.com) from 205.252.137.187 at Fri Sep 18 20:18, 1998 said:


>adrianlo(adrianlo@netvigator.com)said:


>九記又話所有隧道冷馬都裝設八達通收費機,但係依家又唔係全部都


>有,算點先!





E.g.:968


三叉戟‧ATR1


Article 17:

做海外巴士迷的好處和壞處


C Ma (madc@bp.com) from 202.164.246.177 at Fri Sep 18 19:51, 1998 said:


等我數下先:





壞處:


1. 好難 update 香港巴士資料 (有 HKBDB 後好o左 D)


2. 好難打去三巴的熱線聽/ fax 資料 (IDD? 好貴o架!)


3. 少機會同其他巴士迷面對面交流


4. 難訂巴士模型


5. 難去遊車河 (平日20/30/60 分一班, 8pm 收車, 星期日休息,


點遊?)





好處:


1. 司機一般較友善


2. 有行車時間表


3. 找影相位置較易


4. 可以自己駕車去找巴士


5. 便宜 (一張車票任搭 - Melbourne)





請繼續.





C Ma 於


Melbourne Bus Depot


Article 18:

[問]九記14部新Trident的車身


William (William.Lau@xtra.co.nz) from proxy.xtra.co.nz at Fri Sep 18 18:55, 1998 said:


Can anyone tell me:


How many of them are ALX500 Body?


How many are Duple Metsec?


And which ATR belongs to which body?


Thanks in advance!


Article 19:

城躉發威+ATR1裝佐報站機


G153 (mrtywong@netvigator.com) from hhtam039145.netvigator.com at Fri Sep 18 18:36, 1998 said:


尋日搭2232(E21)返航, 部躉一上北嶼公路就越戰越勇,


連過三部龍躉, 唔駛廿分鐘就行完青嶼幹線, 都咪話唔


犀利.





相反之前搭龍躉(E34)入機場俾2100(A11)同637(E11)甩


街, 感覺真係天壤之別.





另是日搭ATR1見到部車裝佐報站機, 不過仲未用得.








下周一離港升學的


G153


Article 20:

問題+討論


MAN (manning@netvigator.com) from hhttnt05056.netvigator.com at Fri Sep 18 19:25, 1998 said:


我想問:


1.怎樣知道o的九巴的訓練巴士以前係乜編號?


2.「水塘龍」(AD,3AD)可能嗎/有冇呀?


3.除51外,有冇邊D線的車係「有D特別」?


討論:


4.你覺得邊D路面是夾硬用大車o架?


thank you!!!


Article 21:

(__告) 12M Bus Page


Citybus Friend (kc09707@school.net.hk) from blue.alumni.cuhk.edu.hk at Fri Sep 18 18:05, 1998 said:


Some word for 12M Bus Page


It will update every Monday


Two First Bus Story Update


Some Citybus News


Some Octopus Card Information


Later will be New Airport Information


Citybus Routing List........


Come to see it


http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Garage/3015


Article 22:

問題加發現數個


K.Y.Chung (w3d080r@school.net.hk) from blue.alumni.cuhk.edu.hk at Fri Sep 18 20:37, 1998 said:


1.我開始發覺哥治的巴士模型有些左右唔對稱.唔信你可以


用一隻眼小心望住個鬼面罩.


2.我以為中記師傅先至會係紅綠燈前開門傾偈,原來新記冷


馬騎師(師傅)都仲會係紅綠燈前開門同另一條行車線的騎


師傾偈,仲夾雜大量粗口.


3.猜躉有兩個油缸,都係擺係第二車軸前,但係十點六米的猜


躉如果有兩雙車門的話個左邊油缸就無位擺.咁係咪十點六


米猜躉得一個油缸呢?


Article 23:

新記幾時再買新車?


adrianlo (adrianlo@netvigator.com) from hhtam022030.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 11:37, 1998 said:


>adrianlo(adrianlo@netvigator.com)said:


>新記幾時再買新車?買的又會不會再買Dennis Trident或者Dennis


Dart?


Article 23: (Request 1)

新巴現已再買 260 架新車, 包括 Dennis Trident, Dennis SLF


10.1 米 Dart


新巴另外訂購的 240 架車現正陸續到港.





Jose Marti


Article 24:

Re: 徵求巴士帝國檔案和特別消息一個


C.K. (syhung@netvigator.com) from hhtck007004.netvigator.com at Fri Sep 18 21:55, 1998 said:


> Fat-Fat Pig (carsonw@netvigator.com) said:


> 如有巴士帝國檔案, 請E-Mail給我, Thanks


> E-mail= first_bus_web@yahoo.com


> ICQ= 9368897





我都係想要


E-mail:syhung@netvigator.com


ICQ:5133942


> 特別消息:


> 在模擬城市3000這隻遊戲中, D 巴士是一架


> 實物(內設是一架類似Dart的巴士), 聽說可


> 以把巴士的外型改變的


> 附圖:


> http://www.tilly.com/sc3k/screenshots/scsht111.htm


> 留意正左方的紅色巴士


Article 24: (Request 1)

> CHIUCHIU (chunglai@hkstar.com) said:


> 有人要巴士帝國!! 我有!!


> 2 floopy


> How can I send to u?


>


> CHiuChiu





I want get one, can you send it to me?


Email: roberthk@netvigator.com





Thank you very much!!





Robert XF176


Article 24: (Request 2)

我也要


請寄來nichlas@netvigator.com


如要寄檔案,請先將你的Outlook Express開一封新郵件,再發現上


高有一列寫著 檔案(F) 的行中,可發現 插入(I) ,在按附加檔案,


就能夠Send給我們了。





Nicholas Louie


ICQ UIN: 15306525


Article 24: (Request 3)

可否send一份給我?


用e-mail 或icq 都得.





e-mail: c6004436@net2.hkbu.edu.hk


ICQ: 10649173


Article 24: (Request 4)

c6004436@net2.hkbu.edu.hk





唔該晒...


Article 24: (Request 5)

> VA36 (kchojbl@school.net.hk) said:


>


> 順便比埋我呀,唔該哂!


>


> kchojbl@school.net.hk





WHy can't send to u !!?


Your mail box Error.


By ChiuChiu


Article 24: (Request 6)

可唔可以再試一次,如果仲係唔得,就用ICQ啦(UIN請麻煩你search


我o既e-mail address)。





Thanks!





因為電郵出現問題,請板主見諒!


Article 24: (Request 7)

I want to have one copy too.





E-mail: jacobc@netvigator.com


Thank you very much





DC1


Article 24: (Request 8)

再順個便,send埋比我


hktsui@netvigator.com


icq:19256983





Thank you


AV191


Article 24: (Request 9)

copy them to hard-disk, and make a zip file.


Send it by E-mail or ICQ ^_^


Article 24: (Request 10)

個檔案有幾大?


如果有人有,我都想要





AV191


Email:hktsui@netvigator.com


icq:19256983


Article 24: (Request 11)

我又是想要,唔該晒!


(E-mail address: fungbus@hongkong.com)


或ICQ: 17552112


Article 24: (Request 12)

我都是想要,可否Send 比我,


E-mail address:makhome@netteens.net


Article 24: (Request 13)

我亦想要


E-mail:lps288netvigator.com


Thank you!


Article 24: (Request 14)

> 我亦想要


> E-mail:bebeto@vtech.net 或


hbcmouse@hknet.com


ICQ : 9999706


> Thank you!


Article 25:

近期城記迷....


Walter Kwong (h9816113@hkusua.hku.hk) from mp1224.hknet.com at Fri Sep 18 21:47, 1998 said:


唔知係唔係呢排城記俾呢度的人插得多,城記迷呢排開始反擊,插


番轉頭,九記因為樹大招風,成為炮灰!





冇可否認九記係有令人不滿的地方,但佢的服務亦有令人滿意的地


方,插之前可唔可以搭下九記先?唔好淨係搭D雞肋線,搭下九記


服務好的線得唔得先?





唔係針對城記迷,我見有D城記迷都好理智,但有部份就....


動不動就話:請將條線俾城記玩!


大佬,你估係BB玩具丫,你話俾就俾....





仲有,呢度近期差D要長期停板,請大家 post 文前三思閣下大作


的內容!


Article 25: (Request 1)

> 叻霸佳 (letchan@netvigator.com) said:


>


> 九記服務其實真係日日退步。你看看水塘車的日增.......唉﹗


> 唔係話載多0的人唔好,而係冷氣車係咪可以載咁多人。唔係話上到車


> 行得就叫做可以上,而係冷氣問題﹗


> 好似沙甸魚咁,空氣點流通呀﹖


> 熱狗就得,因為開車就有氣。難道0的弱雞出風就可以冷頂閘水塘車得


> 以有有效通風﹖乘客之災乎﹖


> 九記是誠心疏導乘客的是加車或開特車,而唔係加水塘﹗


> 要人由大埔企出旺角,咁係乜待客之道﹖


> 如果城巴或新巴有同類型的同線,九記早就迫得開靚車了﹗


> 作風保守,待慢乘客。


> 咁唔通講兩句吐心聲都是錯嗎﹗


> 咁人家車多有位坐唔駛企(城巴及新巴)都有錯﹖


> 咁比較下又係錯﹖一比之下,優劣立見﹗





KMB service is really deteoriating. More hotdogs can be found on 690 than CMB period. The KMB vehicles on 619 & 397 are also poor. Not only this, there are insufficient bus service to & from HKUST during morning.


Article 25: (Request 2)

> 叻霸佳 (letchan@netvigator.com) said:


> 九記是誠心疏導乘客的是加車或開特車,而唔係加水塘﹗





但係有些情況下, 加車會否令交通更擠塞 ?!


Article 25: (Request 3)

> Citybus 10 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) said:


> KMB service is really deteoriating. More hotdogs can be found on 690 than CMB period.





客觀D睇,呢D叫唔叫做『多元化服務』,唔駛下下迫人坐貴車?





> The KMB vehicles on 619 & 397 are also poor. Not only this,


> there are insufficient bus service to & from HKUST during morning.





本人係HKIEd(香港教育學院)學生,我o地凈係可以坐九記275,


但係我覺得服務幾好喎!班次都好足!


(順帶一提:我次次上車都俾足錢o架!)


何況你HKUST(香港科技大學)有小巴到,


你覺得九記唔好o既可以坐小巴o丫!


再唔係可以去坐某公司開去電視城o既車……


(行遠D,支持自己『偶像』都好^_^)


你幸福過我啦!有得揀!





前兩日入過將軍澳的


LX253


Article 25: (Request 4)

一間巴士公司服務進步與退步是要看整體的, 九巴不停購入大量新車,


如果它們不是全放在車廠不出來的話, 總會放了在有些路線上的. 即是


說, 你所說的某些路線 '退步地' 採用舊車, 也可以說明其他路線大幅


'進步地' 改用新車. 凡事不能只看局部的.





--


車匙!


Article 25: (Request 5)

> Walter Kwong (h9816113@hkusua.hku.hk) said:


> 唔知係唔係呢排城記俾呢度的人插得多,城記迷呢排開始反擊,插


> 番轉頭,九記因為樹大招風,成為炮灰!





我很希望板友們可以不再互'扣帽子',什麼中九城鐵新嶼冠陽巴迷也


好,只希望各位能理智一些.





喜歡某一公司,不是罪嘛,別人有不同的取向,是他們的事,為何要強把


自己一套加在別人身上?又為何要為某一些不智和不理性的言論而動


氣呢?





的確,城巴的愛好者在板上是不受歡迎,無何否認是部分人以往也有


'出位'的言論,但我期望各位不要一竹篙打一船人,給予其他守規則的


,傾向支持城巴的巴士迷一點空間,可以嗎?





我深信,全港整體巴士服務水平的提高,是所有不同傾向巴士迷的共同


希望,而不是在於希望某一公司'死亡'.





若你們不支持/反對的巴士公司真的消失,咁又點呢?





Alex Chan.


Article 25: (Request 6)

唔係話反擊,我都係本著有0個句講0個句0者.我已經盡量令自己中立去分


析件事.好似我都話城記同九記鬥係輸梗.如果你硬說我係插返人轉頭.


無話可說.





我已經盡量理性0架啦.但如果有人踩著我,我也會光火.


冇錯,我有時係會幾出位,過火.但一隻手係拍唔響的.


冇人想任何一間公司死亡.起碼我冇咁諗.








鮑魚


Article 25: (Request 7)

講得好!





小弟依家招供,小弟絕對唔係城記迷(城記痴重貼切),


今世都應該唔會係.





點解要寫呢篇文?





君不見o個六大點,全部都熟口熟面,呢種言論o係個板經常出現?





為乜D城記痴真係當正佢係香港巴士o既模範?





冇冷馬呀,搵城記啦!


班次疏呀,搵城記啦!


由A去B冇直線車呀,搵城記啦!


冇遊車河線呀,搵城記啦!






係囉,睇o下城記遲D殺到過o黎九龍新界,食九記D線o個陣,又係咪


改善到服務?





至怕彌敦道,長沙灣道,觀塘道,尖沙咀,新城市廣場,條條大路


由朝到晚排滿巴士,交通大亂...





九記無可否認冇城記咁進取,但係唔代表城記就可以取而代之!





o既


凱日‧豪原





p.s. 小弟九一開始,冇再搭非九記102, 香港10號, ...


Article 26:

Re: 北區對外巴士線


DL (ss78k@netteens.net) from imsp013.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 16:38, 1998 said:





> 北區首相 (ericnet@hkstar.com) said:


> 根據北區星報, 民建聯北區支部及一些區內人士消息, 北區對外巴士


> 線未來數月將有大變動:


>


> 1. 278X 投入服務, 原有 278P 將改行天平及聯和墟;


即係點呀?





> 2. 270A 將改為全日服務, 取代服務三十年的 70 號;


70不應取消,寧願30分鐘一班都好!


(不過72,73A要加密班次)





> 3. 開辦機場巴士線;


早就要啦!





> 4. 開辦首條北區通宵線 N270.


去邊?


>


> 想問各位, 將來北區的交通模式會有什麼變化?


今日我坐278P,見到好多樓快入伙,看來又要向木瓜告密,開


辦上水粉嶺南全日過海線。





>


> 北區首相





DL


Article 27:

298B


DL (ss78k@netteens.net) from imsp013.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 06:52, 1998 said:





> Jacky,AL65 (williamc@tsl.net.hk) said:


>


> 298B現時只在上/下兩味,咁日後的296B


> 係會做全日還是像298B般做上/下?


> 若296B做全日,咁298B會否轉全日?


>


> Jacky,AL65


> MSD32





298B快轉全日,宜家已不斷試車!





DL


Article 27: (Request 1)

首先要記得九記做新線o既哲學:


開兩三班單程 → 單程加班 → 改兩味/加回程幾班 → 改兩味長時段 →


兩工班次勁疏 → 視乎客量加車 → 成為線皇





呢個流程表長則十年八載, 短則一兩年, 要睇下有冇競爭對手同不利因素.





我個人就認為, 296B 能否成功, 在於將來有冇 102D, 102E...呢類東西出現.


兩者毫不相干.


Article 27: (Request 2)

E.g:269C


Article 28:

Re: 今日368


三叉戟‧ATR1 (trident@powernethk.com) from 205.252.137.186 at Sat Sep 19 14:37, 1998 said:


> AV191 (hktsui@netvigator.com) said:


> 今日離奇地六點起身走去坐369,班車準時0700開車,司機同我講369取消後


> 佢同368個兩個司機都唔知會調到邊,佢仲話有可能會被踢去269B,


> 全程用左1個鐘頭18分鐘,在高速公路一般維持70-85km/h,都幾快,


> 司機仲好好人,車番我去元朗tim,隨行仲有佢個仔捧場,成車得6個人,犀利!


> 另外想知會68A兄,AV32(GE556)雖然係68M掛牌,但聽司機講,部車


> 係絕少行68M,通常行68X,今日行完369便返元朗東轉68X,我將會加哩


> 架車入68X掛牌表,敬請留意


>


> AV191


> icq:19256983


今日我坐368尾車,AV16,全車5人(包括我),用左唔駛1h.(used 59min)


實...實在太快啦





三叉戟‧ATR1


Article 29:

Re: 為何368,369要到現在才摺?


AV191 (hktsui@netvigator.com) from hhttnt01222.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 11:01, 1998 said:


> Jose Marti (ericnet@hkstar.com) said:


> 下星期一起368及369會摺.


其實369同368今日已經係最後一班,星期日唔開,到星期一已經冇左


> 其實當去年十月968及969投入服務時, 368及369應該會摺, 為何要


> 到現在才摺?


>


> Jose Marti


Article 30:

明報(19.9.98)﹕新巴印製點字路線手冊


Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) from dial003.upnaway.com at Sat Sep 19 11:18, 1998 said:


以下文章是節錄自今日(19.9.98)明報﹕





新巴印製點字路線手冊 方便失明人


Article 31:

Re: 今日同師傅試車GP 6895


GRASSHOPPER (pollymfy@netvigator.com) from imsp038.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 00:23, 1998 said:


> 學徒 (ranger@hknet.com) said:


> 今日同師傅試GP 6895,原因是行車大快,要[車交]慢小小(修理佬泡),


> 於是走去試一轉,由沙廠去,馬安山耀安掉頭,當車在駛大老山公路行


> 駛時,嘩嘩嘩!!行車竟然有86KM/H,太快啦!之後掉頭返廠,原來在背板


> 後面個VOLVO鎖油器雞0左,跳埋條菲掭!之後在換個新鎖油器在去行一


> 轉試試,點不矢0速度慢返啦!得73KM/H咋,比先前慢好多呀!!!!!!!!!!


> 之後就返廠放車,不過其實又係的,D卡佬見度甘0好多都吾泡,俞快俞好


> 呀,TD102KF呢的車大多都開72-74M/H,如果開度有80KM/H話,可能係個


> 鎖油器雞左啦.(其實呢D都係卡佬同巴士迷好鐘意的)


>


>


> 學徒


> PS不如[耳又]消埋個鎖油器重好呀,有甘0快開甘0快,俞快俞好,成日攪


> 到D車也下也甘0 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


> 車





咁咪可以同S3V鬥, 我仲以為S3V係勁野, 原來3AV都咁勁!!


你試車時有冇開冷氣先???


其實volvo應該唔駛鎖啦, 佢快都唔覺啦, 而且咁先至覺得VOLVO的


風格(我覺得), 因為我喜歡VOLVO的!!!


Article 31: (Request 1)

> Cummins LT10 (cumminsl@netvigator.com) said:


>


> I just wondering how fast it would be if the S3V is not locked...


> Maybe 90km/h then??


>


> Cummins LT10





I have taken HC9336 3AV??? on 276P when it was new!


Its max. speed is 90 km/h (平路) ,


I can 't trust my eyes.





GZ5818


Article 31: (Request 2)

有冇咁勁呀, 90KM/H, 我好耐之前搭40X睇到我坐的S3V出城門隧道住沙田時落斜


都最盡去到95KM/H啦(不過其實可以去到100KM/H, 係司機唔去咋!!)


宜家你平路已經去到90KM/H, 咁落斜咪好鬼勁!!!


Article 31: (Request 3)

其實批富豪車(中九城)係咪車廠自己鎖的呢?


皆因富豪車廠向來都非常重視行車安全,咁呢


個又會唔會係TD102KF既真正極速?


Article 32:

Re: 吉偈一問


GRASSHOPPER (pollymfy@netvigator.com) from imsp038.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 00:25, 1998 said:


> K.Y.Chung (w3d080r@school.net.hk) said:


> 點解自從九十年代後期後再無用吉偈的車出現呢?





乜你喜歡吉拿的ENGINE咩???


佢的ENGINE的馬力一般咋喎!!!


Article 32: (Request 1)

> Wan Chi Wai (3AV120) (akw@hkschool.net) said:


>


> But LG1200 used in KMB AD and S3N was produced by Gardner.In my view,this is due to Gardner engine is


> small power.


> 3AV120





I learnt from magazine Gardner had been closed so there is no


more Gardner engine.





Damon


Article 32: (Request 2)

> Zion (fkung@netvigator.com) said:


> 另一個吉拿引擎並沒有放在巴士上的原因是自九+年代開始,巴士公司開始使


> 用空調巴士,而吉拿引擎(6LXCT)的輸出馬力並不足以驅動巴士的空調機,而康


> 明斯的LT10引擎則有足夠的馬力去驅動空調機,而且康明斯引擎容積小(10000c.c.)


> 吉拿則是10450c.c.;馬力則比吉拿大(標準245bhp,最大280bhp)故此巴士公司取康明斯


> 而捨吉拿。





但係九記有輛AD係用吉拿的ENGINE LG1200, 咁又點解釋呢?????


Article 33:

Re: 20, M21重組 + 海傍特快線存廢問題


VA36 (kchojbl@school.net.hk) from hkpu15.polyu.edu.hk at Sat Sep 19 13:52, 1998 said:


> James Kwok (kwoksyc@hk.super.net) said:


> 今日發覺20, M21其實可以重組, 因為M21客唔多(Dart都夠玩), 20更唔駛講, 所以建議有M20出現:


>


> M20: 筲箕灣---香港機鐵站


> 沿路經20行(入太古城)到碼頭後以機鐵站為總站.


> 收費以20為準(小童及長者半價, 站牌以紫底白字顯示, 因本線並非海傍特快線)





入太古城?咁一定唔會有筲箕灣客搭。





另外,如果將來722會轉日的話,21 o既保留價值大過20。





> 另外你地覺唔覺得'所謂'海傍特快線(黃底紅數字)己經係廢左呢?拿,


> 又有東廊7系線, 又地鐵, 仲駛乜要海傍特快線?!





唔係,起碼我會搭,我住北角,落中環搭18最方便,88最快;至於20


,佢唔夠18、88快,況且又兜中環碼頭、機鐵站,要搭都o係皇后像


廣場落o左車;至於21,主要o係皇后大道塞,去唔到上環都係其次。





又另外,照你建議,M20算係乜?真係當佢係機鐵站接駁線,我o依家


都只係當M21係21加冷氣。








Joseph Ho


Article 33: (Request 1)

講真,20號客量唔算差,又唔算太好,只是平平冇奇~~


最衰係要兜中環碼頭,如果唔係,應該會多D客坐,但唔兜又唔得,總之麻煩~~~


黃底紅數字0既意思係--市區半直通路線,並非海傍特快線.





DA82,HB8095.


Article 33: (Request 2)

嘩, 又去耀東, 又去太古城, 又去北角, 兜晒先去中環?


都係智叔講果個 20, M21, 88 重組好 D.


㊣確名稱係叫「市區半直通路線」, 記住係「半直通」.


而家東廊線係「全直通」, 所以「半直通」路線都有其價值,


起碼唔駛行怡和街至炮台山一段電車路, 可以塞少幾個字.


事實上行維園道的確係幾快丫. 至於站牌顏色, 可以取消黃底紅字o既.


Article 34:

Re: 希望各板友不要用廣東話貼文!


Ken Fung (kenf@hkstar.com) from 202.68.58.226 at Sat Sep 19 15:23, 1998 said:


> Mr. Bean! (cityman@netteens.net) said:


> 希望板友們用語體文來貼文,因為用語體文來貼文,可以增加


> 大家的語文能力. (請不要嫌我老套!)





你只是表達你的意見, 況且你並不是在強迫板友使用語體文,


本板是歡迎表達意見的, 因為香港本是一個言論自由的社會,


但我相信你的意見並不是全板呼應, 你要有心理準備.





你是新板友嗎? Welcome! ^_^





每次乘坐 19 號都是乘坐 2025 的 Ken


Article 34: (Request 1)

你喜歡改善你自己的語文能力, 你可以貼語體文, 這個我很欣賞,


惟本板中未必每一個人都有此需要的, 也請你了解.





--


車匙!


Article 34: (Request 2)

但糸敢先至夠親切喎!唔用口語本板可能會好悶架!


啊DICK


Article 34: (Request 3)

廣東話/白話文給人輕鬆, 親切的感覺啊 ^o^


亦或多或少可舒緩平時日間工作或學習之緊張情緒





難道你希望由早至晚都看著語體文看得發慌嗎?


Article 34: (Request 4)

.........我們冇你那麼有文化, 香港是語言混合的社會, 我想用任何語言也沒有問題吧 ?


Article 35:

Re: 70號用12米?????


Tony(S3M61 (op615221@netvigator.com) from hhtam005093.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 13:34, 1998 said:


> GRASSHOPPER (pollymfy@netvigator.com) said:


> 我尋日係禾輋等巴士時, 見到一輛70號的九巴, 我開頭以為係ADS, 但


> 睇真, HS的車牌, 我心唸ADS好似冇HS的車牌喎, 原來係一輛3AD, 我心唸


> 70號都用12米, 會唔會浪費左少少呢!!!!


>


> 你地又點睇呢????








該架係3AD140(HS14??),有大欖隧道轉車站廣告。


係響上水見到。


其實十二米行70並不出奇,以前我都見過唔少,


例如3AV142,3AD140等。





P.S:今日又見到十二米既3AV行70X


> 我咁講又對唔對呀????


Article 35: (Request 1)

70號間中就會有12米行架!


最大可能是來自276P.


除左3AD外,3AV都有行過





字軌表70號頁責人Rick


巴士資訊網


Article 35: (Request 2)

尋日我都見倒, 仲係大欖隧道線廣告既車, 唔駛點望都知係12米


70 號行12米, 都係攝車, 小弟覺得無乜所謂


反正唔係長用, 浪費一日半日, 由佢啦~ ^o^


Article 36:

Re: 屯裝遊記


DA74 (c3035083@hkstar.com) from 202.40.137.101 at Sat Sep 19 16:18, 1998 said:


> Flying Chuk (chuk@netvigator.com) said:


> 今日同81C落在屯裝睇'你好笨'同白Trident,


> 但架'你好笨'泊左係入面,睇唔到~~~*.*~~~,


> 但架白Trident就泊左係街外,我影左幾張相同


> 影左Video後,我就去研究佢,我發現架車尾


> 左倒車燈爛左喎,而架車好似冇輪椅位(個位


> 得三張座椅,冇軟枕),而架車睇落都幾舊下


> (特別係偪偈).而我仲見有森拿美有人o黎


> Check Duple trident o既冷氣.


>


> (PS:Neoplan司機位後那扶手已經被拆了)


>


> 飛機竺





佢會唔會change to 金色?


Article 36: (Request 1)

你講架白Trident?八成機會會上金色.





飛機竺


Article 37:

Re: 九、城、新,哪間較進取?


S3BL390 (s967817@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) from aquila.hkschool.net at Sat Sep 19 15:22, 1998 said:


> 新九城 (cityman@netteens.net) said:


> 如題.


以現時狀況當然係新記0拉,要一下子買幾百部車,又要同食鬼爭食!





S3BL390


Article 37: (Request 1)

敬請避免再提出此類問題吧


說至天光也得不到結論~


亦容易引起罵戰 ^_^'


Article 38:

Re: 假如我係一個司機!!!!!!


Panda LM8 (chan2468@netvigator.com) from hhttnt02014.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 15:48, 1998 said:


> GRASSHOPPER (pollymfy@netvigator.com) said:


> 假如你宜家係司機, 咁你又可以選擇巴士, 咁你地會駕駛邊架呢!!!!


>


> 我會選擇S3V, 其次係3AV啦!!!


> 你地會點選擇呀????








First I will choose LM because this type bus is king of


the Chai Wan Road.


Second I will choose CX.





Thanks.


Panda LM8


Article 38: (Request 1)

我會選擇利蘭11米, 因九巴還未將所有利蘭鎖車, 還可保持著較高的車速


路線方便, 我希望是九巴的72A 或 城巴的 930


這兩條路線長短適中, 不會太悶


而且有市區段, 有公路


可以轉下彎, 感覺自己真係楂緊車, 又可以飛馳一段公路


都幾寫意~ ^_^


Article 38: (Request 2)

> 我會選擇SF ,因為它比LF短,而且可以玩轉波.


>


> 新來的


> LV6 (CF 5483)


Article 38: (Request 3)

LV兄,恕我直言,請不要在文章前加上'>'!(sorry!)





我會選擇駕駛ME,因它起步有力。





但我反而驚舞唔倒架車!





Rick


巴士資訊網


Article 39:

Re: 城記一問


NWFB DA90 (refchan@netteens.net) from imsp013.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 11:57, 1998 said:








> Tao (lai1207@vol.net) said:


> 又話 71 同 75 號合併為71A 同71B線, 但現都未實行?





研究緊呀嘛,不過真係咁做0既話,一定要用12米行(隧道→,薄扶林道←)呢條唔知A定B線,


但係我覺得成數唔高,75繁忙時間一定要用12米車走





DA90--HH6198 (年驗中)


Article 39: (Request 1)

城巴做呢類 A/B 線, 兩條線都係用番同款車種 (25A/C, 37A/B),


以方便跳飛機. 而且 71 途經o既薄扶林道左轉第二街彎位, 並不適宜


十二米車行走, 所以改做 A/B 線時, 相信要捨棄 75 o既大車, 除非二線


同時加車. (等新一批富豪到港後)


Article 40:

Re: 新記 LA10


NWFB DA90 (refchan@netteens.net) from imsp039.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 10:01, 1998 said:





> 蔥角 (chunkwok@hkstar.com) said:


> 今日o係香港仔隧道見到舊巴LA10 o既夢想已經實現, 因為


> 佢已經油o左新巴顏色, 變成一架真正o既新巴....


> 不過有個分別, 就係冇波浪紋... 行緊590


>


> ps 算唔算今日特別所見??


>


> 蔥角





梗係唔算啦!LA8仲早過佢出,加埋LA11都油埋一份。


而且我搭過晒啦!


Article 40: (Request 1)

睇怕都唔算特別所見, 因為琴日已經第一日做返590字軌,


亦係590第一架字軌with新巴樣





ALX500 Kamy


Article 41:

Re: 有沒有八見過S3V30啊?


AV340--進 (eeckc98@alumni.ust.hk) from ustsu68-nc2.ust.hk at Sat Sep 19 16:22, 1998 said:


> Andy (chunyu19@netvigator.com) said:


> S3V30 在那裏?在那條線?





S3V30是荔廠車, 40X掛牌(不過今日唔見).





--HM3044


Article 42:

Re: 有哪些新巴二手冷馬已翻油新巴色


GF1912 (yanho@netvigator.com) from hhtck007001.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 17:11, 1998 said:


> Gakei! (gakei@netvigator.com) said:


> 除了 LA8,10,12 外, 還有邊o的? 有否其他車款 (DA, DC, VA) ?





還有DA89.


Article 42: (Request 1)

聽講DA90都髹緊, 可能已經髹好.





有冇人影o左可以擺上網? 我未睇過! :(


Article 43:

Re: 如果過海線設有雙向分段


Gary&Carol (garycarol@ctimail.com) from mp1727.hknet.com at Sat Sep 19 13:50, 1998 said:


> N357 (clarina@vol.net) said:


> 如題,過海巴士會不會多D人搭呢?


> 例如,九巴與城巴聯合營辦的619:


> 空調全程:$9.4


> 分段:


> 過海後:$5.4


> 軒尼詩道往順利:$8.9


> 如果加設:


> 順利--東隧收費廣場〈雙向分段收費〉:$5.4


> 港澳碼頭--北角(健威花園)〈雙向分段收費〉:$5.4


>


> N357





建議唔錯, 但係咁樣在繁忙時間令過海客會減少


部份客在未過海就落車, 使過海時未能充分使用巴士資源


唔過海的乘客, 還是坐回島內線較好的


亦可避免某些巴士公司胡亂加班用來接載唔過海的那班乘客,


引致更大規模既塞車


Article 44:

Re:新記有缺點!?


Mr. Bean! (cityman@netteens.net) from imsp039.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 15:33, 1998 said:








> adrianlo (adrianlo@netvigator.com) said:


> 名,所以要在車頭放一個總站地方名的硬牌,好麻煩.


> 雖然司機再受過訓練,教佢地唔好飛站,要好禮貌,但係我唔覺有咩改善.





這不是整間公司的缺點,而是電子牌箱的缺點.請不要誇大!!!!


而且我覺得新記的司機還比九記好!!!!!!!!!





同學 李XX


Article 45:

Re: 新記會否買B7L(Super Olympain)?


GRASSHOPPER (pollymfy@netvigator.com) from imsp037.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 14:13, 1998 said:


> K.Y.Chung (w3d080r@school.net.hk) said:


> 如題.





B7L(Super Olympain)係咩車呢架, 我唔識呀???


Article 46:

Re: Octopus on NWFB buses


DA54 (da54@netteens.net) from 202.67.228.58 at Sat Sep 19 14:19, 1998 said:


> DC4 (abrao@netvigator.com) said:


> When will New World First Buses use octopus card system?





October they said.


Article 47:

Re: route 15


Fungbus (simong@netvigator.com) from hhtam027107.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 15:43, 1998 said:


> abrao (abrao@netvigator.com) said:


> Does anyone know when NWFB route 15 will be air conditioned?





As today I heard a driver said, 15 will change to air-conditioned in a short period of time, and will use DC


Article 48:

Re: MC+MB28問題


CMB DA82 (da82@netvigator.com) from hkpu15.polyu.edu.hk at Sat Sep 19 09:56, 1998 said:


> 古競豪 (fatku@school.net.hk) said:


> 我有一位同學話MC豪華巴士己經全部停駛,到底是否真有其事?


唔係!我到日仲見到最少有2架MC行63.





> 另外,想問問MB28目前情況如何?





湯左LU...





DA82,HB8095.


Article 49:

分享經驗:令人難忘的巴士旅程


巴士文 (daraman@netvigator.com) from hhtck016185.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 03:27, 1998 said:


日前曾回應某板友的題目(巴士旅程聽乜歌至正),令我突然多年前


的一件往事,可說是'令人難忘的巴士旅程',內容如下:





大約十年前(88年),我仍在念大專,某一個深秋初冬的晚上,跟一


位玩夾'band'的知已到八鄉探朋友,並取回借出的木結他,因夜深


接近午夜,51己收車(當時還是用單層Ailbon Viking EV55),便轉


64K到元朗,轉乘68X出九龍(最後一班元朗車ME,隨後的全是荔廠


的S3M),一上車便坐在上層車尾,因全程車的上層乘客不足十人,


巴士駛出元朗,我的朋友便開始彈結他,見其他乘客沒反應或投訴,


我們便開始唱歌,先是Beyond的<<冷雨夜>>(當時Beyond還未走紅),


接著唱羅大佑的<<家>>,也有唱英文歌,一路由洪水橋唱到美孚,當


時天氣很涼,開窗後的風很大,巴士又開得特別快,認真夠味道!


至令我難忘是大約唱了三、四首歌後,有兩位中年男士竟回頭並報以


掌聲,其中一人更拿出香煙請我們吃(當時巴士上層是准許吸煙的),


因我不懂抽煙而沒接過香煙,其他乘客都並沒有提出抗議說我們的聲


浪騷擾他們,有位年青男士更跟我們唱了一首英文歌<>,


此情此景實教我難忘......


現在那位ROCK友朋友已移居台灣,早己剪掉長髮,不穿熨畫T恤,只


有穿西裝,官仔骨骨的,在台灣至大間的電腦生產商成為行政人員,


一切也'俱往矣'!!





各位板友,你們又有甚麼特別難忘的巴士旅程,可以跟其他板友分享


呢?





不再聽流行曲,也不能再乘ME行68X的巴士文


Article 49: (Request 1)

My most unforgetable bus journey is the CTB 10 journey on 1 Sep, from 1000. I decided to take it until it reaches North Point. But it was raining so hard that traffic was very slow, & I left at Tin Hau at 1100.


A week later, I took CTB 10 to North Point again, & successful.


Article 50:

[無聊俱樂部]板友雜談


鮑魚 (leyland@netvigator.com) from hhtck006161.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 02:30, 1998 said:


自己上這個討論區大概有一年.話長唔長,話短唔短.


看文看得多,自然不會每篇看.


結果變成因題目的吸引力及作者而去決定看,或不看.


有些板友的文章可說是必看的.


例如Alex Chan兄,他的文章無論內容,結構,文筆,都大有資格去寫專欄.


他的論點鮮明,而且都十分有道理,若你硬說他的說法是錯的話.通常只


是你無理取鬧.(我在上板初期也曾與先生發生一些爭拗,真是抱歉)


另外又如Stanley Yung兄.他的資料好新,好快,亦好準確,從不放流料.


他的剪報十分齊全,可以說是一個巴士的資料庫!又由於他曾於巴士公司


工作的關係,故對於運作上也十分熟悉.


學徒的文章也是必看的.我覺得他雖然是粗聲粗氣一點.但其實很多關於


巴士結構上的知識也是從學徒身上續少續少地看回來的.很有意義.





當然,板主的文也是必看吧.他是大佬嘛!如果說板主先生是蔣天生的話,


Gakei兄就像陳耀了!我覺得Gakei兄好像每一篇文也看.真是懷疑他那裡


有這樣的時間和精力去應付.





中流抵柱我覺得就是TPT,Eddie Lam,Claymon等人吧.他們像是本板的活


躍份子.雖然在某些事上我對Eddie Lam是很不滿的.但他在字軌表上的努力


卻是有目共睹的.對觀塘,將軍澳區巴士事務上的認識也可說是全板之冠.


而TPT對黃竹坑及Claymon對東區的認識,令我覺得他們像該區的代表般!





這裡還有很多藏龍伏虎存在.有些板友竟能將一些陳年舊線的發展史如


數家珍般一一道來.又有些板友可從區議會或其他途徑得到最新的資料,


令板友們能先睹為快.真是很感謝他們.





其實私底下我跟板友們也沒有什麼來往,以上只是真心說話.


大家也可談談閣下對板友們的感覺呢!








酒酣耳熱論巴士,驚倒鄰牆,推倒胡床.板友拍手笑疏狂.疏亦何妨?狂亦何妨?


鮑魚


Article 50: (Request 1)

老實講,我上板都有一年,與其日日睇住板友們o既


鍾久繩辛連場大戰,公說公有理,婆說豈有此理,


我寧願揀你呢個『無聊俱樂部』系列D文o黎回咯……





我呢幾日都強調一點,大家都係成熟o既人,


上o黎『發表言論』梗會認為自己講得o岩先至貼文,


不過我o地始終唔係十二三歲迷偶像o既靚妹仔,


唔好成日以為自己偶像做o野一定o岩……


(講過好多次,唔講喇……)


上o黎呢度睇文,唔係某公司fans話某公司不是,


就係問邊間公司最進取,


好似D fans問邊個歌手D歌最好聽,


再唔係就城城迷(純屬巧合^_^!)炮轟東東咁……





大家議事論事係好,不過中肯D,客觀D啦!


好似我係辛巴家屬我都嘈辛巴錄音熱線差啦!


 面紅耳赤數公司,你謾我罵,搞到停板.互相推諉又怪責,怪亦不智!責亦不智!





作得唔好,唔好意思 ^_^!


LX253


Article 51:

九巴工程車及後勤車輛


巴士文 (daraman@netvigator.com) from hhtck017047.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 02:19, 1998 said:


我想清楚知道整個九巴車隊除營業用的巴士外,其工程車及後勤


車輛的用車情況,現列如下,如有錯漏,歡迎各位板友指正、賜


教,謝謝!


1.訓練巴士:退役的G、N、3BL、3N、3M、M、AA、AM,偶然也用


現役專利巴士如3AV、AV、S3V等作操線之用。


2.拖車:Volvo FL10、日產實力UD、三菱Fuso,還有其他牌子型


號嗎?


3.大型貨車:改自退役客車的阿比安、日產實力UD、三菱Fuso、


五十鈴Isuzu.....


4.中型貨車:豐田Dyna、三菱Canter、五十鈴......


5.輕型貨車:豐田Liteace、Hiace、萬事得Bongo、日產Urvan......


6.垃圾車:三菱Fuso、日產實力UD......


7.大型錢箱車:日產實力UD


8.水車:Leyland/Daf、Dennis......


9.私家車:三菱Lancer、Galant、Spacewagon、日產Nissan Cedric


(供交通部、保險部等使用)


10.客貨車:日產Nissan Urvan(供車長訓練學校用)


11.開蓬巴士:丹拿E


12.古董巴士:丹拿A、AEC Regent v、Ailbon


13.客務中心:Dennis Dart AA1





以上各項還有甚麼錯漏?煩請指正!


另誠徵九巴工程車和後勤車輛的相片和資料,若肯與我分享者請電郵


給我,謝謝!





一直對工程車和後勤車輛有與趣的巴士文


Article 51: (Request 1)

> 4.中型貨車:豐田Dyna、三菱Canter、五十鈴......





> 5.輕型貨車:豐田Liteace、Hiace、萬事得Bongo、日產Urvan......


把好似冇Liteace喎....


> 8.水車:Leyland/Daf、Dennis......


仲有三菱Fuso喔


> 9.私家車:三菱Lancer、Galant、Spacewagon、日產Nissan Cedric








> 以上各項還有甚麼錯漏?煩請指正!


> 另誠徵九巴工程車和後勤車輛的相片和資料,若肯與我分享者請電郵


> 給我,謝謝!











> 一直對工程車和後勤車輛有與趣的巴士文





飛機竺


Article 52:

Re: 單靠做巴士!好難賺大錢!


巴士文 (daraman@netvigator.com) from hhtck017047.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 02:49, 1998 said:


> DC10 (s986380@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) said:


> 陽光巴士:945R元朗至北角,點解唔打正旗號「九巴」行走?


若打正旗號用專利車行945R,會跟自身968構成競爭,而且客量


可能不足以支持一條專利線。


年前九巴重組公司架構,除專利巴士業務和地產外,仲不斷開拓


子公司以擴展業務範圍,例如跟華爾德阿歷山大、新美景在內地


合資開巴士車身裝嵌廠、跟新福港合資藝東提供皇崗口岸穿梭巴


士服務、跟大連一汽、澳門其新合資大連港濠提供當地巴士服務,


成立龍運開展北嶼及新機場巴士網絡,這一切舉動都說明一個道


理:賺錢要從多方面入手,不可單倚靠某一方面的業務,如某句


英諺:Don't put all the eggs into one basket!而且運輸業


務尚有很多發展餘地,換個身份便能做多些生意,何樂而不為?


我曾聽過有證券界分析員指出,當年新鴻A地產入股九巴,並非


單看好其巴士業務......此話不錯!例如肯承擔一項公共事業,


對本身公司或多或少也有好處,例如官塘廠建成創紀之城,還有


荔廠地皮,又如場光巴士營運的屋村巴士線,其屋苑發展商多也


是新地!公共事業的收入細水長流,但背後的資產才是肥肉!


所以中巴泊埋太古地產,絕對係有著數的!





巴士文


Article 53:

新褔記越來越離潽!


B-2051 (dickson2@macau.ctm.net) from 202.175.30.37 at Fri Sep 18 23:59, 1998 said:


濠江新褔利越來越差!! 在中午上學繁忙時間所見, 3 號線和 33 分


別以五分鐘一班或以上服務. 但相反, 當時有不少學生都要一定搭這


兩條巴士線返學, 變了每架車頂晒閘不單止, 連乘客都上不到車. 大


佬呀! 沙梨頭獨市你都唔洗咁呀! 我見到 33 行 O814D 都唔夠用!


唉! 還有呀! 去機場免得過唔好搭新褔利呀!! 上次我和一位飛機迷


搭新褔利 AP1 去葡京吃 pizza, 點知在無塞車的情況下, 成半小時


才到葡京, 平時只需十五分鐘, 而且架車沿途都未開過快過 30KM/H.


今天亦是如此! 搭 26 返新馬路! 今次好少少啦! 廿五分鐘到! 嘩!


架車在(乙水)仔不過30KM/H, 其中在時運至大橋中段不過 25 KM/H!


後來有個交通警渣住架電單車響銨後, 架巴士突然架快! 一支炮上到


橋頂! 我都唔知個師傳想點!! 還有呀! 個站無人都要停停架車! 咁


先至激死你呀!!





搭新褔利搭到發晒俾氣的 B-2051


Article 53: (Request 1)

昨晚我打電話去問一個想熟師傳, 問他為什麼新褔利的師傳開得咁慢,


原來是員工不滿公司. 因為自從公司實行一天多更制, 使到原本有半


小時的吃飯時間都無了, 而且公司在半小時吃飯時間的吃飯津貼都無


了, 即是變相減薪. 還有很多師傳都要跳飛機, 做到他們都無晒心機,


所以咪一起開好快, 一時開很慢囉! 其實現在連暨查和站長都不公


司都滿,所以有時派車連續幾架來, 有時就無晒車在總站! 員工實行


和公司暗示作對.


至於澳巴方面, 由於近排換了新經理, 可能對澳巴的運作有所影響,


不過近排見到價錢牌和乘車規則的牌都美觀得多! 比新褔利好得多.





B-2051


Article 54:

Re: 城記八達通同九記八達通供應問題


Alex Chan (alexki@netvigator.com) from hhtun019070.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 00:12, 1998 said:


> James Kwok (kwoksyc@hk.super.net) said:


> 頭先搭102過海發覺城記絕大部份12米豪(連HU車牌都有)都裝左八達通, 相反九記就淨係裝左個架就唔理(個架已經裝左成個暑假), 令人懷疑大細超情況連八達通供應都有?





八達通機的供應似乎是輪流的,例如先供應九巴,之後城巴.....





我這樣想,是因為在早幾個月,城巴不夠八達通機用,而九巴則大部分


隧道車都上了機.(此時九巴上機的數量比城巴多很多)





如果供應真的是輪著來,何來大細超?





何況九巴車隊大,城巴相對較少,而八達通機供應有限,九巴安裝了的


巴士,感覺上自然會較城巴少.





假設,城巴安了1000架,大部分巴士便會安裝八達通,而九巴同時安了


1000架,就只有1/4巴士有機.





因此,問題是在八達通機製造商上,而不在於個別巴士公司.





Alex Chan


Article 55:

新巴電子牌箱 '21' + 新記工程車


James Kwok (kwoksyc@hk.super.net) from taikoo.hk.super.net at Fri Sep 18 23:25, 1998 said:


頭先過海搭102(來回), 見到兩架猜躉(1016, 1017)個電子牌寫住:


'中環 21'同'太古城 21', 另擋風玻璃有紫底白字寫'M21'





離譜D喎, 新記晨咁早已經話將21改做M21, 點會個電子牌寫21?





另外約19:45興發街有架ML跪左, 後面就有架新記工程車AD4563, 呢架其實係前中記紅番水翼船, 不過原來o既'猜喇摩拖畢史'同車頂'中巴工程車'字樣就俾新記用o個隻'新巴'白貼紙封左.





今日17:00同19:35搭城記102的


James Kwok


Article 55: (Request 1)

問題似乎是在於入資料時出錯,因為新巴Trident電子牌連N680都可


出,為何不能顯示出M21.





早前有板友post過新巴504站牌,可能Trident電子牌也會有504的資料


.....^_^





Alex Chan.


Article 56:

Re: 村巴中環→元朗收$10.00..頂唔頂得順 ?


三叉戟‧ATR1 (trident@powernethk.com) from 205.252.137.189 at Sat Sep 19 00:19, 1998 said:


> VA-61---HP 8961 (kyy690@netvigator.com) said:


> 近期有幾間屋村巴士公司,有一間公司帶頭減價到$15.00,跟住有另一間


> 公司大幅減價到$10.00,你認為咁做法會否


> 【惡性競爭】


>


> VA-61~~~~~~HP 8961


你是不是講由中環-->元朗御景園之村巴?去中環$20,


返元朗$10。個司機話17:00之後就有車返元朗,


約20~25分鐘一班。如果版友在該時間


入元朗,不妨試試吧。





朝朝去元朗返學的


三叉戟‧ATR1


Article 57:

Re: 究竟三巴o的董事而家想什麼?


Gakei! (gakei@netvigator.com) from hhtam026163.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 01:12, 1998 said:


> MAN (manning@netvigator.com) said:


> 如題,請討論.





我們又不是他們腦裡面的蟲, 怎知他們想什麼 ?


Article 58:

Re: 問個人八達通


Gary&Carol (garycarol@ctimail.com) from mp1727.hknet.com at Sat Sep 19 00:24, 1998 said:


> 巴士放射學技師 (96013269d@polyu.edu.hk) said:


> 到底有沒有巴士公司推出的「個人八達通」?如有,如何申請?


>


> 模型 VA60 車主


> 巴士放射學技師





暫時沒有, 現在還是只有輕鐵可以給廣大市民申請。


Article 59:

【網頁廣告】「巴」全集加入CX1,2等相


MC1 (n7136579@netvigator.com) from hhtam039142.netvigator.com at Fri Sep 18 21:12, 1998 said:


「巴」相集今日加入巴士相多張,包括:





中巴:CX1,DA57,DA83,LM4,SF5,VA16,VA52


新巴:2015


九巴:ATR1





而今週大相為CX2.





按此進入「巴」全集





MC1


Article 60:

Re: MC(13)


Claymon (wang5@hknet.com) from 202.67.235.147 at Sat Sep 19 14:19, 1998 said:


> DA74 (c3035083@hkstar.com) said:


> Where are those MC that used on RT13 in the past now?





相信變左做士啤車, 今日有兩部行 84M (MC4, MC10)





智叔


Article 61:

VA63


DA74 (c3035083@hkstar.com) from 202.40.137.101 at Sat Sep 19 16:34, 1998 said:


VA63是否112字軌?


Article 62:

Re: 106 有冇提早?


Claymon (wang5@hknet.com) from mp1902.hknet.com at Sat Sep 19 17:11, 1998 said:


> DA74 (c3035083@hkstar.com) said:


>  請問新巴106還有冇提早(before 6am)開頭車?





由於新巴時間表跟中巴, 所以一樣有早廿分鐘開車


時間表首先是


一車 ML78 開 5:40


二車 DA58 開 6:00


三車 DA61 開 6:07


..... (連一部九城特車共十四班)





但因為以前中巴慣左更早開車, 為左令乘客唔會突然無車呢,


實際上通常大約係:


ML78 開 5:35


DA58 開 5:45


DA61 開 5:55


....





智叔


Article 63:

(廣告)E31 on the Net更新


Flying Chuk (chuk@netvigator.com) from yckam017036.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 16:12, 1998 said:


E31 on the Net之車輛特寫加入了白色九巴Trident,


CTB 新2200系列及CTB土炮B6.





歡迎參觀





飛機竺


Article 64:

今天368


好想喊的三叉戟‧ATR1 (trident@powernethk.com) from 205.252.137.185 at Sat Sep 19 15:55, 1998 said:


今天368


今天係368的Last Day,服務元朗區多年的368終於被968。作為


元朗居民都感到可惜。所以今朝0635就到了元朗西站向這位「朋


友」拜拜。


到o左西站,睇到擊壤路有部369經過。0640有部AV??(忘記


o左),映左兩張相佢就走lu~…


0658,我正當去站長室問問368用乜車行,那時AV16已準備好


了。0700,AV16開到6-11門口上客,我亦都影了幾張相然後上


車。上車後,就同司機傾左兩句。0703,司機開車,全車得5人


,巴士一過博愛就80-90km/h向香港前進,大部份時間都唔會低過


80km/h!禁住城巴D利蘭,但當司機駛到上水近彩園村對出時,


巴士突然失去動力,那時我都幾驚,怕要轉車才能繼續前行。


司機[手禁]o左幾下錢箱,錶版的針左右擺動幾下,再次打火。


經過幾次打火後,繼續前行。0745,巴士駛到東廊,飛快地向


中環駛去。0802,巴士到達終站,我落車替巴士映了最後一張


的368,我[手禁]下快門,從此368就同我們說再見了。那個司


機仲車我返元朗添。368留給我的除了一張膠牌和乳豬盤'料'


之外,只有傷心的回憶了~……





望到尾車的膠牌就想喊的


三叉戟‧ATR1





現在向368&369作最後告別!


Article 65:

【剪報】千呎巴士廣告


PTC (bc_cly@stu.ust.hk) from ustsu54-nc2.ust.hk at Sat Sep 19 15:10, 1998 said:


http://susis.ust.hk/~bus/images/ixus.jpg'





請問城記係咪自己接番廣告呢?





PTC


Article 66:

Ad on CTB


Citybus 10 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from max14-41.hk.super.net at Sat Sep 19 14:41, 1998 said:


Yesterday, I saw a Nautica Fall/Winter Clothes ad on CTB 1025. I also saw there were many buses carrying Orange Telecom (From UK, owned by HWL) ad on the right side. They include:


(1) Fresh (A pair of hand carrying sea star),


(2) Jubliant (a baby swimming),


(3) Hoping for (postbox),


(4) Time concept (words reversed in direction) (sundial).


An advertisement was found on 941, making the Instant-Dict Ad the first one to get dissolved.


Banner Ad of Jackie Chan's film-Rush Hour, also found.


Article 67:

[廣告]新網頁


634 (ccheung8@asiaonline.net) from 202.85.97.40 at Sat Sep 19 13:54, 1998 said:


如題. Welcome!


http://www.geocities.com/TheTropics/Island/3268/index.html


Article 68:

Airconditioning on NWFB


DC4 (abrao@netvigator.com) from hhtun022172.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 11:36, 1998 said:


Discuss when each NWFB route will have air conditioning.


Article 69:

ATR1時間


啊Dick (dvchan@netvigator.com) from yckam033042.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 11:24, 1998 said:


本人想影ATR1,可唔可以


話比我聽佢係秀茂平的


開出時間!唔該!拜托!


啊DICK.


Article 70:

參觀巴士廠一問!


C.K. (syhung@netvigator.com) from hhtck007029.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 10:59, 1998 said:


邊間巴士廠係唔洗登記就可以行入去?





好想去巴士廠睇下的


C.K.


Article 71:

【廣告】誠讓......


屯兵 (chungtm@netteens.net) from imsp039.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 00:30, 1998 said:


多本今日九巴,包括:


期數 內容


第28期---九巴技術訓練學校


第39期---九巴服務約章


第43期---九巴全力支持環保(2本)


第45期---聖誕購物樂


第46期---1998-2002年五年路線發展計劃


第47期---賀年


第48期---醫療中心換新裝(2本)


第49期---保安精英


第52期---龍運新機場巴士(2本)


第53期---香檳色車隊,上賓式感受


*********************************


有興趣索取的板友,請e-mail本人


欲免向隅,e-mail從速





屯門之友


Article 72:

與其水塘豪,不如1+2


正牌新城九 (95280097d@polyu.edu.hk) from 202.82.249.15 at Sat Sep 19 17:29, 1998 said:


> GRASSHOPPER (pollymfy@netvigator.com) said:


> 早排我睇到一份報紙, 有人投訴九記有些3AV 同AV將下層的坐位拆左,


呢D改裝既巴士之唔係'水塘豪'囉!





> 變左企位,搞到俾貴錢都要企,好難舒服咁坐,雖然可以令車的載客量增加,


> 但我覺得冷氣巴係舒服麻, 盡量應該俾人舒服麻, 而且咁樣好唔似


> 冷氣巴的格, 所以我覺得九記最好就唔好改佢啦!!!


水塘容量只得10個,但少左6個坐位,結果就只係裝多左4個,起水塘


都唔知做乜,要方便超載?





當年引入D水塘3軸熱狗,無非都係加大載客量,但係而家既冷馬


仲未可以設計到可以承受咁大既重量,除非真係用15米車,


所以到而家部份既隧巴線仲未可以全冷,唔通要搞到舊隧塞


到行唔到車?所以九記要整D'水塘豪'無非都只係權宜之計,


但點知運署只係俾水塘裝10個,九記呢次係大失形象分.





冷馬D下層坐位好取巧,冇上層2+2咁闊,點解唔改做1+2,坐得既舒適,


又可以多番D企位.


Article 73:

有冇人見過以下情況(夏曆七月版)


Nicholas Louie (nichlas@netvigator.com) from hhtck001063.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 17:08, 1998 said:


情況一:農曆七月尚有兩天(今日係七月廿九),截至現時,有冇人見


過有人在巴士站、燒衣而又影響司機開車?我曾見過有個阿婆在九龍


城燒衣,司機見此按下響鞍Bit佢,不過阿婆唔走。司機最後報警,


而我則在車上呆了半個小時。


情況二:有冇人看見明星在車廂內拍MTV?


情況三:搭新巴時,有人畀多錢(大約一元五角),後面的見到,只附


了一元二角(我在小西灣搭82出柴灣地鐵站),畀司機鬧了一大餐,現


在問:有冇人也見過同類情況?你會點做?





Nicholas Louie


ICQ UIN:15306525


Article 74:

3 weeks on, how's 4X,8P & M21 patronage?


Sunba (akyl@rubens.its.unimelb.edu.au) from 203.23.237.80 at Sat Sep 19 16:55, 1998 said:


It is approaching three weeks since NWFB takeover, what is the


patronage on the three new routes?





Is 8P still run with 7 buses?


Has there been any additional buses?





Can any boardmates tell me?





Sunba


Article 75:

新疤消息一則


Schneider 1010 (schneide@netvigator.com) from hhtuhn04058.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 16:45, 1998 said:


據新記卡老透露:黃廠原來已不做日修,年驗,番油...


所有日修,年驗,番油由柴廠做番.


仲有早排VA3入黃廠的原因是壞波箱,


而波箱又缺貨,故它死了在黃廠一段時間.


VA3就快做年驗啦!





另1803已成97R的常規車,只限星期一至五.


有時會懾B10M,星期六用雙層十一米Olympian.





LF18波箱最正....


Schneider 1010


Article 76:

Re: 巴士帝國(遊戲)


龍神丸 (clement@hkplanet.com) from hkpa05.polyu.edu.hk at Sat Sep 19 19:08, 1998 said:





> Steven Yuen (hkyuen@asiaonline.net) said:


> 最近有巴士迷想要巴士帝國這隻Game, 而本人擁有這隻遊戲,


> 但不知怎樣load給你們,請各網友提供方法,


> Thank You!!!!!!!!!





你可以放在你的homepage 上數日俾人download 架, 咁就唔洗email,


叫佢地自己去'手羅'...





我都想知個game 係點既


龍神丸


Article 76: (Request 1)

Send Email 時 Attach 個 file,


CC 俾其他人.





我都想要一份Copy,Thanx.


tomchen@netvigator.com


Article 77:

Re: Rt.108,619,914,917


100/911R Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) from 24hrlab-224.sfsu.edu at Sat Sep 19 18:57, 1998 said:


> KMB fans (ericeric@tig.com.au.) said:


> The route 108 is the rubbish cross harbour route, it's just


> got little passenger from Bramber Hills to Causeway Way


> Also after re-allocation of 119, 619 becomes a rubbish route,


> 914 and 917 is also got little passenger only


> CITYBUS likes to get more routes, I think the above route


> 108 and 914 should give to Citybus services in order to


> reduce the loss of KMB and NWFB





There are so many passengers on route 108 in the morning (towards Hong Kong!) in which 3AV was used...





Ha! Ha! That's more like 108P, or the rush hour version of 100! As this 108 terminates in Causeway Bay!





Unfortunately, 914 and 917 were splitted between two operators, otherwise I think you can combine them into one route. (runs like 5 on Hong Kong side and serve both Happy Valley and Causeway Bay)





I still bet once 914 becomes full A/C, there will be more passengers! (passengers can pack a 11m bus on 917 during evening rush hours)





100/911R Wong


Article 78:

Re: Who operate 968 and 969


Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) from human6.upnaway.com.au at Sat Sep 19 18:35, 1998 said:


968: KMB


969: Citybus


Article 79:

Re: 緊急問路


Andrew Siu (shiaw@netvigator.com) from 203.80.104.18 at Sat Sep 19 18:48, 1998 said:


> 阿一 (jackyfok@netvigator.com) said:


> 請問680經唔經健威花園?





是否指北角健威花園 ? 如是, 680是經 .


Article 80:

新巴出新模型


H.W.Sin (mysin@netvigator.com) from hhtun027080.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 18:02, 1998 said:


可靠消息! 新巴十一月倒出新巴士模型,係單層架! 應該係Dart仔! 你估會係Co 定係EF出呢? 我估係Co出喇! 唔知會唔會係Plaxton Pointer 2? 我一定會Buy, 你呢? First Time 報料, Hope You Like It ! H.W.Sin


Article 81:

【廣告】新巴二手冷馬相


Gakei! -HKBEC (gakei@netvigator.com) from hkpu15.polyu.edu.hk at Sat Sep 19 19:15, 1998 said:


香港巴士展覽中心加入新巴二手冷馬相, 包括四張配中巴色彩的冷馬,


兩張已翻油新巴色的 LA12 (車頭車尾各一張), 歡迎參觀.





另外, 每週大相本週是城巴 674, 牌箱攪 '暫停服務' 及打著 'LOVE',


是否是司機想告訴他的女朋友: ‘我愛妳, 但對不起, 今天暫停服務’? :P





--


車匙!


Article 82:

70號不能取消的原因


James Kwok (kwoksyc@hk.super.net) from taikoo.hk.super.net at Sat Sep 19 19:12, 1998 said:


見到有板友於'北區對外巴士線', 文中建議取消70, 我極之唔同意, 有四大原因:





1): 因為佢經源禾路, 大埔舊墟, 太和等, 始終有其客量, 特別係火炭至大埔一段大埔道, 佢唔行吐露港公路, 去中文大學始終方便D





2): 70頭車開5:40, 271就算假期頭車都開7:00(平時頭車開7:45), N271九龍尾車5:00, 如果70取消左, 除非N271尾車開6:00, 271頭車開6:00, 因為由70頭車至271頭車一段時間係有好多人搭. (好似我家姐, 於大埔醫院返工, 朝早返7:00, 所以就只可以搭頭車70轉71k).





3): 70號入大埔35分鐘, 271反而40分(唔知係咪271冷馬關係).





4): 為我地呢D鐘意遊車河o既傻人o黎講, 70係最佳選擇.





歡迎討論





切望70長存的


James Kwok


Article 83:

Starting point of 968, 969


Superbus (ericeric@tig.com.au.) from p45-max7.syd.ihug.com.au at Sat Sep 19 19:12, 1998 said:


Starting point of 968, 969


Article 84:

Automatic Coasters...


100/911R Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) from 24hrlab-224.sfsu.edu at Sat Sep 19 18:46, 1998 said:


I just remember I tried a Toyota Coaster with automatic transmission in Macau this summer.





I wonder if KMB would be interested to purchase some of these to run routes like M1, M2, 2C and 208 (given the relatively low demand!). For example, KMB can run 2 Coasters for every AM instead decrease frequency like it recently did on 208!





I think running Coasters on these routes will be more cost effective, so Darts and other front-engined buses can be allocated elsewhere where they're needed.





I also think, despite the fact Crown Motors doesn't import any Coaster with automatic transmission, with the large order by KMB, it will probably do so.





KMB can also enhance its fleet of buses with 2+2 seatings. (if you want to argue KMB wants to release low-floor buses nowadays, that's ok, since more Olympians are still on their way anyway!)





Or else how about some Mercedes O814 Vario or Optare Solo?





100/911R Wong


Article 85:

甚麼是'你好笨'同B7L?


James Kwok (kwoksyc@hk.super.net) from taikoo.hk.super.net at Sat Sep 19 19:23, 1998 said:


甚麼是'你好笨'同B7L?B7L係咪即係'富豪低地台12米'?





可唔可以講下上述巴士一D資料?





想知'你好笨'同B7L的


好笨James Kwok


Article 85: (Request 1)

> Citybus 10 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) said:


> Volvo B7L is the best low floor bus available. Its engine is powerful & energy saving. (215 or 250 bhp for 7.3L). Its front independent suspension saves space over the wheel, enable seats to be set up above it, and increases comfortability. Its transverse engine design also saves space & makes it quieter.





嗯? 部份內容都好熟口熟面, 好似以前某些日本轎車的廣告一樣^-^.


是否最好就見人見智, 不過, 一個銀仔都有兩面喇. 例如獨立避震


會令維修費提高, 舒適與否是廠方調教功力問題, 細容積引擎導致


低轉扭力偏弱, 橫置引擎對車尾底盤要求極高, 不然其底盤尾部就


會出現以前Regent?(唔係好記得係唔係)的尾部底盤向下墮.





綠川光


Article 85: (Request 2)

> Colin Chang (kalim@netvigator.com) said:


>


> 係咪'The Best'都仲要拭目以待,我地都未見過未試過部新車,點


> 可以咁快下定論呢?


>


> 中巴AV同AL副引擎都係七升幾,表現方面都各有不同,唔係一面倒


> 話好啦。





我手頭份野寫佢係7.3升引擎(D7C型)有D7C215,


D7C250,D7C290及D7C310四款,馬力分別為215hp,


250hp,290hp及310hp.而扭力及可選之波箱則


沒有公佈.





飛機竺


Article 85: (Request 3)

> Ki Wong (cinddenn@netvigator.com) said:


>


> 你好笨is Neoplan Centoliner





你好笨=Neoplan咋





你好笨腥嘈拉啦先係Neoplan Centoliner








飛機竺


Article 86:

Re: Dennis Law EAT SHIT PLEASE


Eddie Lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) from mars.hkbu.edu.hk at Sat Sep 19 20:01, 1998 said:


Bus Fans (ericeric@tig.com.au.) said:


> Dennis Law EAT SHIT PLEASE,


> do u agree????





嘿! 哥仔, 你好似新黎架可? 不過你個 a/c 都好快冇架喇,


等收板主封警告信啦.


Article 86: (Request 1)

Well, mate, YOU HAVE GONE TOO FAR! That is not acceptable


in here. Look, if you don't agree to anybody on the board,


bring up some sensible points to argue. Look, i think our board


cannot have the kind of member like you. Please issue an apology


to the board and to Dennis personally.





Personal Attack is not welcomed in here. I don't agree with


Dennis most of the time and presumably many of us too, but we


talk sense. I am as a member of the board, totally disappointed


with your action and devastated with the board just reopened less


than a week due to similar incidence.





You should feel shameful for your action! Whatever bus company


you are supporting, you have made others fans a disgrace!





Sunba


Article 86: (Request 2)

Why?Dennis Law is a good broadmate!


Also,please see the rules of HKBDB.





DL


Article 87:

Re: 車尾廣告


NW1001 (mysin@netvigator.com) from hhtun024086.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 20:21, 1998 said:


> Matthew Chung (98064286d@polyu.edu.hk) said:


> 今日係旺角見到一部普通版城巴TRIDENT行E21,嘩!


> 成個車尾都鬆上一個飲品廣告(好似係啤酒),連太平門塊玻璃


> 都有鬆,好靚!


> 請問有冇人知到佢o既fleet no.? 係咪唔只一部有此廣告?


>


> Matthew Chung


CTB Fleet no.2201 also print that advertisement.


Article 87: (Request 1)

> Edward Hong (edhong@netvigator.com) said:


>


> It is 2202, Heineken ad.





And also #2238.


Article 87: (Request 2)

唔止得一部咁少,至少有六,七部


Article 88:

Re: Discuss route 619


輝仔 (c5124176@comp.polyu.edu.hk) from ip58_128.asiaonline.net at Sat Sep 19 20:12, 1998 said:


> 119 fans (ericeric@tig.com.au.) said:


> when 119 closed, it's become 115 and 619.


> 115 always full but 619 has just few passenger


> even in peak hours





115都唔係全日多人, 夜晚七點幾番中環D車都唔係好多人.


Article 88: (Request 1)

619 少人? 你未見過多人o既時候咋?


我頭先先見到有架城巴十二米坐滿晒, 嚮花園大廈返緊順利.


Article 88: (Request 2)

緊係啦, 619 實際行車時間比 119 更長,


點會吸引乘客.





Ricky Chan


Article 89:

Re: Why 302, 303, 305, 336,337 has to cancel


空調禿鷹八十二 (da82@netvigator.com) from hhtun002101.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 19:38, 1998 said:


> 300 series fans (ericeric@tig.com.au.) said:


> Why 302, 303, 305, 336,337 has to cancel





302,305,336都冇取消喎...





空調禿鷹八十二


Article 89: (Request 1)

302,305,336 is still running!


303 have been renumbered to 681P


337 have been cancelled because few people took this route





DL


Article 90:

Re: If Citybus operate 101, 111


DL (ss78k@netteens.net) from imsp013.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 19:33, 1998 said:





> CMB fan (ericeric@tig.com.au.) said:


> If Citybus operate 101, 111, then............





101 may introduce 60-70 citybus,


111 may introduce 16-20 citybus!





The frequency may be within 1 minute





DL


Article 90: (Request 1)

> CMB fan (ericeric@tig.com.au.) said:


> If Citybus operate 101, 111, then Citybus would have much higher profit, even 100 extra bus have to be bought, because no MTR is available in E. Kln & W. HK Island.


Article 91:

Refurbishment


100/911R Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) from 24hrlab-224.sfsu.edu at Sat Sep 19 19:26, 1998 said:


Is it possible to refurbish the seats on buses? As I think the 3+2 seats on DA types and CTB 505-510 (don't say I don't 'step' on CTB!) are very uncomfortable. So I wonder if there is any chance the concerned bus companies will replace these seats at all.





How about installing adjustable air-vents on those AL's, AV's, 3AV's, AD's and ADS? (or even AN's if you want!)





I also read an ad regarding a bid for refurbishing some 200 3-axles buses of CTB. (further 200 may follow for the successful bidder) Any idea which ones are they?





(my guess would be those 11m Leyland Olympians, followed by some 10.4m and 12m Leyland Olympians)





100/911R Wong


Article 91: (Request 1)

> Gakei! (gakei@netvigator.com) said:


>


> If the bus is not so crowd, definitely NWFB 3-seaters


> are more comfortable.


>


> Also, it is necessary for NWFB to retain those high-capacity


> buses before the bulk delivery of the new Tridents. The


> refurbishment you suggested should be consider after these


> old a/c buses become a minority.


>


> the final factor we should consider is the cost effectiveness


> in doing so.


>


> --


> Gakei!





Oh! You probably misunderstood my point! My complain towards those 3+2 seats wasn't the 3+2 seats themselves! If you noticed, I didn't complain about the seats on LA's and VA's at all.





Those seats on 3+2 DA's are uncomfortable because for some reasons they seem to be lower than the LA's and VA's, hence passengers would be like sitting in a bathtub.





I think the cushion on the bottom portion of these DA's seats are much less than those on LA's and VA's, as I do feel comfortable on the latter ones.





For 505-510, the individual seats are contoured too much and they're too narrow! (once I was with my dad on 507 and he thought it was a CMB bus!)





Sure hope you understand my point!





100/911R Wong


Article 92:

Re: 追捕B7R


NWFB1010 (bonopun@netteens.net) from ipg2-122.hkg.com at Sat Sep 19 20:50, 1998 said:


> K.Y.Chung (w3d080r@school.net.hk) said:


> 想捕冠水B7R的請留意:可在下午3:30至4:30間於港運城附


> 近見見到,但並非每日見到.


不如去黃金海岸捕,機會大好多


Article 93:

Re: Apologize


Sunba (akyl@rubens.its.unimelb.edu.au) from 203.23.237.80 at Sat Sep 19 20:41, 1998 said:


> Bus Fan (ericeric@tig.com.au.) said:


> i want to apologize to Dennis Law, but i cant control my


> hand to type the apologize thing to him coz HE REALLY AN


> ASSHOLE.......agree???





If you want to mess up this board, go away! What are you doing


here? Where the hell you from, huh? Can you just back away from


the board for god sake!





If you don't intend to make an apology, just go away and never visit


this site AGAIN as you are not welcome anyway, there is no need for such


language.





I hope you never visit here again!





Sunba


Article 93: (Request 1)

I totally agree with you. This person made no intention to apologize (despite the title) and continues to use foul languages. He also changes his name for every threads he places.





Oops! I don't want to say anything more, as I'll become someone like him soon. I just hope the boardmaster/administrators (I thought there are many) can take immediate action for the matter, as I don't want to read anymore thread with foul languages.





Sincerely,





100/911R Wong


Article 93: (Request 2)

算啦,不如放他板假先啦,唔使即時判死刑住掛.


人地而家都道歉啦,得饒人處且饒人,我唸唔使


咁絕.


Article 94:

Re: 龍運巴士行九巴線


金魚 (n960@hkabc.net) from ppp253149.hkabc.net at Sat Sep 19 20:35, 1998 said:





> DL (ss78k@netteens.net) said:


> 今朝我坐59X,見到龍運Lance行238X!





該車是AN14,FS7880





今日玩左成日EMERGENCY的新GAME的金魚字


DB7872 HS7872 HU7872


Article 95:

雙層巴士會否再於澳門出現?


K.Y.Chung (w3d080r@school.net.hk) from blue.alumni.cuhk.edu.hk at Sat Sep 19 20:46, 1998 said:


如題.


Article 96:

笑話一篇


DL (ss78k@netteens.net) from imsp013.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 19:46, 1998 said:


假如......





?署決定不延續A巴士迷會的專營權,結束其?年的服務。


而其中88位會員即時公開招標、13位會員轉交B巴士迷會及C巴


士迷會,另外11位無用處的會員予以取消!


(其餘13位非常規會員亦取消)





生效日期:?年9月1日





你估到時會點呢?





DL


Article 96: (Request 1)

咁無稽既事都有? 比我係個會, 死鬼o左佢咯.





P.S. 巴士迷會係無「專營權」





每週金句: 少說話, 多做事.....


T.P.T.


Article 97:

To Boardmaster:Cut 'Dennis Law Eat ...'!


Citybus 10 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from max11-19.hk.super.net at Sat Sep 19 19:43, 1998 said:


I found there is a thread called 'Dennis Law EAT XXXX PLEASE' and is a libel to him. This creates a bad image of the HKBDB. So please cut this thread immediately.


Article 97: (Request 1)

To every boardmate, think calm and intelligent.


Don't let this go too far.





To Dennis Law: Think forgive and forget.





Sorry, no bus subjects.


Article 98:

徵求相片


NWFB1010 (bonopun@netteens.net) from ipg2-196.hkg.com at Sat Sep 19 21:00, 1998 said:


由於本人近期無時間外出影相,本人現希望徵求以下照片作私人收藏


長榮航空廣告


紅富豪(九鐵新富豪)


龍運lance


Article 99:

[巴士帝國]疑難


豐巴 (simong@netvigator.com) from hhtam023150.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 20:59, 1998 said:


首先多謝某板友send了這隻game俾我,萬分感激!


但我自知玩遊戲唔到家,所以呢隻遊戲以我來說都幾難!


以下有幾條問題,希望曾玩過這遊戲的板友能解答,thank you


1.遊戲一開始我應做什麼?


2.怎樣開線?


3.有什麼技巧/秘訣能分享?





豐巴


Article 100:

歡迎進入<香港巴現場討論地帶>


999 (ykh97@hkstar.com) from hkusuc.hku.hk at Sat Sep 19 20:58, 1998 said:


每逢一, 三, 五, 11:00pm-12:00pm <每日有不同題目><題目由參與者設定>


但要有Microsoft Chat, 即時討論巴士問題, 十分方便.


有興趣者請電郵至


參與後再有詳細資料





如有任何意見請電郵至


Article 101:

新記,城記爭開南區機場線


NW1001 (mysin@netvigator.com) from hhtun031116.netvigator.com at Sat Sep 19 21:45, 1998 said:


早前新巴表示想開辦由南區及小西灣去機場的路線,但係無下文之下,城巴竟搶先申請開辦由南區經西區去機場的路線. 依家就睇當局俾邊個派車行走喇! 大家拭目以待吧!


Article 102:

[廣告]有雙層巴士在啟德跑道尾


Rick (chopchoi@hknet.com) from tigereye.hknet.com at Sat Sep 19 21:44, 1998 said:


日前,我和John到觀塘碼頭影80X.


去到後,見有很多HKF的舊船泊晒o係度,於是望o下!





點知放長雙眼後,竟見有九巴在舊機場跑道尾,


與其他車一起在試車,不知做甚麼。





巴士資訊網,已將這張相登出,但比較模糊。


這張相放在新開幕的相集中的'每月勁相'中,歡迎參觀!


而較清楚的相將會於稍後推出!





另外,本網主頁亦已革新,歡迎參觀!





請多多支持,多多指教!





第一次上觀塘碼頭外堤霸的Rick.


巴士資訊網


Article 103:

Oh! No!


100/911R Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) from 24hrlab-224.sfsu.edu at Sat Sep 19 21:47, 1998 said:


Yikes! Someone reported 2204 served on A11 today! Also being objective and as a gesture to show I don't blindly support certain bus company, I've the following comments:





1)My friend (without Internet access) and I discussed 61 airport spec Tridents simply aren't enough to cope with the current (and future) demand of the existing 4 aiport bus routes of Citybus.


Also Citybus seldom takes into the account buses do breakdown from time to time. Thus having 61 buses being 'just enough' to run on these 4 routes is not very wise.





2)I do understand Citybus (and probably other bus companies as well!) swaps buses between different routes once in a while. However, using 2204 on A11 is a bit too far! (perhaps 223x or 224x with a single door, which can 'pretend' to be a coach, would be better!) Although, in general, I do agree these new Tridents come fairly close to CityFlyer's specification, as the seats are the same. (just without the pillows) Anyway, it would be better to use 2204 than, let's say, 567 or even 342! (maybe swap 316 or 336 from non-franchised division is a good idea!) Of course, anything is better than nothing at all!





3)Since someone also reported 2233 being on E23 today, I wonder if I'd see a 22xx on A22 and 21xx on E23, both arriving at Jordan Road for me to choose to go to the airport! (of course, the premium fare you pay for A22 would still be worthy a bit due to its shorter travelling time)





4)This incident maybe the result (or punishment) of the case when I took 2105 on E21 two weeks ago!





100/911R Wong