Today's Articles: 35.
Articles' Numbers: (19980820_01-35)
Article 1:
Re: 哥池推出new model一問?
MCW (leeootsse@ctimail.com) from 203.80.97.38 at Mon Sep 7 08:33, 1998 said:
> 小丸子新巴VA51 (k5959585@hkschool.net) said:
> 小弟想知,究竟crogi幾時才推出城記331 大食鬼 Olympain
> 12m a/c模型呢?
>
>
> because I want to buy it!
>
>
> Thank you very much!
>
>
>
>
> VA51 TONG HN8481
> LV97 CM7009
> NWFB already...
有得訂MODEL:43214(UK LIVERY)19.95
CORGI會訊話FOR英國.今個月再出KMB丹拿A(NO 1)MODEL:40407
Article 1: (Request 1)
講開又講,點解只係得各公司和巴士迷會出車仔, 又唔見會同世界會,
甚至刀疤會合作出. 仲有, 點解efe通常出舊車;corgi出新車.
唔知會唔會有機會出老虎頭模型?
Jess
Article 1: (Request 2)
> Ronald (ronald_to@laser.zeronet.org.hk) said:
> (下略)
>
> 做車仔都要有辦法以最短時間'sell'晒先得.
> 因為一做就幾千,萬幾咁做,要百幾二百萬元的.
> 邊間機構有這樣'實力'?
>
> 而且唔係間間巴士公司都「授權」給你做車仔.
> (九,新,城巴...自己做仲好賺)
>
> 所以其他機構出車仔的可能性將愈來愈少了.
> (除非....九鐵巴士部買躉....!)
>
> 建議各巴士公司將銷售車仔的收入,扣除成本後設立慈善基金,
> 或像九巴賣路線圖般,全數捐比公益金.
> (對公司形象有好處嘛...)
>
> Ronald
Wei! I've been to the Corgi web site yesterday. they has announed the Capital CTB Leyland 12m will be out soon!
There site is Http://www.corgi.co.uk
Go there and have a look!
Article 1: (Request 3)
我就認為應該模型公司出左車後, 全數交晒俾巴士公司賣.
唔好流出去其他市場度. 因為而家外界 (如 N80) 車價實在高得不能接受.
我絕對支持用原價買車!
--
尋日嚮新城市九記服務站
見到好多人買金躉模型o既
Eddie Lam
Article 2:
看不到 大 相 ＋ 問 題
Humphrey (humplaw@netvigator.com) from imsp038.netvigator.com at Mon Sep 7 12:21, 1998 said:
> Hanvas 漢 華 (hanvas@netvigator.com) said:
> ● 城 巴 單 門 都 普 躉 （ 每 週 大 相 ）
>
> 《 香 港 汽 車 網 絡 快 線 》 現 已 正 式 更 新 「 每 週 大 相 」 一 欄 ，
> 內 容 為 城 巴 單 門 都 普 躉 一 大 部 ，
> 歡 迎 參 觀.
>
> ● 問 題 一 個
> 究 竟 城 巴 有 幾 多 都 普 躉 係 單 門 ， 又 有 幾 多 都 普 躉 係 雙 門 呢 ?
唔知點解看不到大相.仲有單門有乜好處?
Article 2: (Request 1)
> Gakei! (gakei@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 有冇左邊車身o既相呀,
有 有 有 ， 未 得 閒 Scan 嘛 ， 睇 住 呢 張 先 啦 ......
>
> 一方面標榜 '單門', 張相又睇唔到 '單門' o既 ?!
你 標 榜 部 車 係 低 地 台 巴 士 ， 都 唔 一 定 百 分 之 一 百 影 到 個 低 地 台 啦 . :p
查 實 學 阿 邊 個 星 期 六 嚮 灣 仔 碼 頭 所 講 ，
「 今 日 做 番 日 傻 瓜 先 」 ......
我 今 日 冇 用 單 鏡 反 光 機 影 ， 只 係 用 傻 瓜 機 ，
所 以 影 唔 到 動 態 巴 士 ， 而 部 車 一 埋 站 就 只 可 影 到 右 邊 ，
左 邊 我 就 只 有 打 直 影 ， 所 以 放 唔 到 入 每 週 大 相 ......
Article 2: (Request 2)
查實呢個又未必, 我用傻瓜機一樣影到架車側晒~(動態) 如:
搭到VA11既.....
T.P.T.
Article 3:
六個E和五個E的故事
LM3 (angela05@netvigator.com) from imsp037.netvigator.com at Sun Sep 6 23:23, 1998 said:
小弟剛剛在新巴熱線查路線42，
講的人好像剛剛在大陸(沒有任何意義)請來的，
當她講收費時，是這樣的--》(簡化版)”空調收費六個Ｅ($6.2)，
非空調收費五個Ｅ($5.2)'
當講整數時，個蚊字是超高音的
希望能快快改善！！
LM3
Article 3: (Request 1)
還有更好笑的:
1. 305...過香港仔隧道後...
乜美林出中環要過香港仔隧道嗎?
2. 115...來往太古城碼頭至中環(港澳碼頭)...
fo_O
3. 641...講講下炒粉...都唔知佢講乜...06:xx23:xx20
4. N680...由中環(港澳碼頭)至錦安苑...
死囉...乜錦安苑有巴士總站既咩? 唔見既? fo_O
5. 691...途經0個巴士站...
原來係一出總站就直去另一總站, 中間不停站的...
重有架...我冇抄低咋...留待你(妳)發現...
龍神丸
Article 3: (Request 2)
> DA54 (da54@netteens.net) said:
>
>
> 請新巴從速改善.....
同意...真係好難頂呀...又斷斷續續...又d音好怪
(唔似香港本地音)
Article 3: (Request 3)
鄉唔鄉音其實冇大問題, 而家問題癥結係個系統好唔掂.
嶼巴路線少, 地區重疊較多, 班次稀疏但有規律 (開 00/30/45 等)
先可以用呢種斷續式錄音法. 新巴咁鬼多線, 地方又多, 時間表條條
唔同, 根本唔能夠咁錄. 唔該新巴出番少少錢換過九記/城記個系統.
將「時間表」、「收費」、「行車里數/時間」、「途經街道」一段過錄音.
家陣 D 資料駁錯晒又炒埋一堆, 唔係巴士迷一定俾佢老點.
若果有咩報章睇到呢度, 唔該都反映下.
Article 4:
Re: 屯門--上水巴士服務
Jess (c5013830@hkbu.edu.hk) from 202.73.247.95 at Mon Sep 7 00:27, 1998 said:
> 金魚 (n960@hkabc.net) said:
> 今日收工坐58M回家,到良景站後,見到田景區議員李先生,
> 他說,正和九巴商討一條由屯門東--上水的巴士線,而屯門東
> 只有一個可能的地點,就是嶺南學院旁的新屋村.
此通告在安友有了多時, 多謝那個討厭的塵雲生.
屯門東至上水的路線還有很多可選擇地點:
青山灣/三聖/友愛(南)/綠茵庭(恒基建築中樓盤)......
>
> 44A有對手啦!!
如果唔經新墟, 關44A甚麼事?
>
> 金魚字 HS7872 HU7872
Jess
Article 4: (Request 1)
> 大腦電波 (leungtam@hknet.com) said:
> 開小巴線會比較適當.
> 因為該區的居民較少.
> 建議路線.
> 嶺南學院,青山公路(藍地,洪水橋,屏山),元朗公路,新田公路,上水
> 火車站.
唔 介 意 既 話 可 唔 可 以 去 埋 粉 嶺 呀 ?
因 為 粉 嶺 好 似 冇 車 去 屯 門 呀 !
Article 5:
Re: 有什麼方法用(前)中記寶寶行青嶼幹線 ?
walter (walterch@school.net.hk) from hkusuc.hku.hk at Mon Sep 7 02:11, 1998 said:
> rt.690 吳佩慈 Fans (kyy690@netvigator.com) said:
> 如題,歡迎討論
將寶寶改成訓練,試行青嶼幹線
But ML/DL居多
Article 5: (Request 1)
可否(以私人名義)向新巴租車搞遊河,
然後每人上車先至收一百元一位(嘩!!)
扣除成本後有多的捐去慈善機構....
我想,這樣做沒有像上幾個星期的問題出現...
(p.s.租冷氣同無冷氣車價錢是否一樣?)
Article 5: (Request 2)
o係大嶼山開個'湯'車場,等D寶寶行青嶼幹線去俾人'湯'.....
入去重唔駛俾錢!(因為冇回程!)
Jason
AA 55
Article 6:
新巴士一日遊
Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) from hhtam005136.netvigator.com at Sun Sep 6 21:49, 1998 said:
> Kwan (SFAC3A09@NETVIGATOR.COM) said:
> 我想一日內坐哂九,新,城各新巴士.請問有什麼好辦法?
> 九記:山寨+都普躉.(有可能的話)
> 新記:新躉+Dart仔
> 城記:單門躉+山寨躉
你可以試下以下一日遊:
九巴1A(至太子地鐵站)=ATR1
九巴300(太子至上環，港灣道下車)=ATR
新巴8號(灣仔至小西灣)=1XXX
城巴85(小西灣至北角)=13XX(捷聯車身)
新巴27(北角至寶馬山，雲景道下車)=Dart
城巴41A(寶馬山至華富)=Dart
新巴47A(華富至金鐘)=Man
城巴969(金鐘至天水圍)=Trident(Duple Metset)
希望你可以滿意
如果再有問題,可以E-mail或ICQ16337027/18323393找我
Article 6: (Request 1)
> 新巴47A(華富至金鐘)=Man
冇Man行好耐啦!得1324...or捷聯B6.
> 城巴969(金鐘至天水圍)=Trident(Duple Metset)
都好似冇0左...得蘭或豪
有錯請指正
Schneider 1010
Article 6: (Request 2)
上環→300金躉→太子→112新躉→北角→27新Dart(一轉)→
北碼→HKF→九龍城→E22單門躉→機場→Cityflyer山寨躉
Article 7:
Re: 278P一問
Rick (chopchoi@hknet.com) from mp1141.hknet.com at Mon Sep 7 16:49, 1998 said:
> Kwan (SFAC3A09@NETVIGATOR.COM) said:
> 今日中午出去食飯,見部278P在我身邊經過,我想問278P
> 的行車時間?不是他只是晨早線嗎?
可到巴士資訊網閱讀該線詳情。
巴士資訊網
Article 7: (Request 1)
278P只開上下午，時間係:
上水開:上午6:30-10:30 下午2:35-8:20
荃灣開:上午7:40-12:00 下午3:50-9:35
班次:9-20min一班(上午) 15-20min(下午)
Article 8:
[WA]Buck Up, Buckle Up
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) from dial008.upnaway.com at Mon Sep 7 09:59, 1998 said:
The following article is extracted from the Sunday Times published on 6.9.98:
BUCK UP, BUCKLE UP (By Peter Sweeney)
How do we expect people to abandon the comfort of their crawling cars when we don't offer them basic safety - seat belts - on public transport?
The sight of one person in cars clogging our so-called freeways - and of motorists getting as hot under the collar as their engines do under the bonnet - isn't pretty.
It's devoid of commonsense and practicability.
As is the lack of seat belts on public transport, especially buses.
Bus drivers regularly have to brake suddenly or switch lanes quickly to avoid collisions with cars. Most of the time their evasive action works.
Sometimes, often due to the ignorance of motorists, it doesn't. And that creates enormous safety problems for passengers.
As we race towards the new millennium and a high-tech existence, speed and sleekness seem to be the main priorities of public transport operators.
They're only following the pack. In what's become a fast-paced world, speed and sleekness appear to be the priorities for all.
Travel is no exception. Whether it's wandering from work or heading for a holiday, the traveler wants to get there quickly.
However, safety must never be sacrificed for speed. Safety concerns should always be the biggest issue.
Whatever the mode of travel - bus, train, plane, boat or car - there will always be accidents.
Nobody can prevent them. But it doesn't mean we should accept accidents. Every effort must be made to minimize the possibility of an accident and the extent of tragedy - before the event rather than after.
And that's where seat belts come into the story. They're proven winners.
Facts show you're more likely to survive a road accident if you're wearing a seat belt.
That being the case, why haven't we got seat belts on our public transport system, much of which these days is in the hands of private operators?
Especially when you consider it's compulsory for a person in a rather slow-moving car during peak hour to have to wear a seat belt, while a bus carrying 100 passengers can bustle along with them unrestrained.
Seat belts should have been installed in public transport, especially buses, years ago.
Little point arguing the point now. However, something must be done today so that tomorrow travel will be safer.
And to prevent us having to learn a nasty lesson before we act.
One day, the popular attitude of 'it'll never happen' will be blown to smithereens.
Imagine the carnage if a fully loaded city-bound bus ploughed into the rear of a car that had strayed into the bus lane in peak hour?
Heaven knows where unrestrained passengers, both standing and sitting, would end up.
The thought of the serious injuries that could be sustained is sickening. And don't think it could never happen.
Regardless of warnings and heavy fines, it's not uncommon for impatient motorists to steer their vehicles into the bus lane.
There are many other motorists' indiscretions which bus drivers have to put up with.
But it's not just one-way traffic.
Many bus drivers whip their vehicles along as if there's no tomorrow.
There's little room for escape if something goes wrong.
And just as the wheels can fall off a football team, the wheels can also come off buses.
It happened on the Kwinana Freeway about two years ago when the back wheels of a bus parted company with the body.
One of the wheels bounced into the path of oncoming traffic, damaging a car but, amazingly and fortunately, not hurting anybody.
Damage has been caused by buses having tyre blowouts.
A thorough check of our buses last year found some had serious mechanical defects and that others were riddled with rust.
Many more were reported to have varying degrees of serious problems.
Seat belts in buses are a long, hotly debated issue. It peaked late last decade and resurfaced early this decade when passenger coaches were involved in rollovers and crashes in the eastern States.
They're not compulsory in coaches. But companies that have seat belts have reported favorable responses and results.
Much has, and will, happen to our public transport system.
Planners are trying to lure car lovers away from their tool of convenience - on the promise of life being healthier for them, the environment and make them more relaxed.
Satellite technology and tracking devices will give commuters up-to-the-minute information as they travel their routes.
A state-of-the-art, 10-year plan for buses and trains was recently released by the Department of Transport.
Hundreds of millions of dollars will be spent updating Perth's bus and train services.
They will go faster and further, be bigger and better, sleeker and slicker.
High-frequency services, circle routes and transitways will become facts of life.
However, one wonders just how much, if any, thought has been put into seat belts on public transport.
It's compulsory on most other forms of travel. Why shouldn't it be there?
Standing room has become a thing of the past at the football - maybe it's time the same applied on our buses and trains.
It's time commuters were strapped in. The ride home mightn't have the same thrills. But it will be safer.
And what matters most?
Article 8: (Request 1)
If seat belts are made compulsory, then I am sure their may be
someone switching to cars or trains since they don't bother
to wear seat belts, and some even like the fact that they
don't have to get tied on a bus.
If it's voluntary, who's responsibility is that if an accident
happens and someone was injured or even dead?? This has already
created a bit of an argument around Australia for years.
If belts works on buses, they would have got them in years ago.
However, quite an extremity, belts have been successful on
coaches and all new coaches from 1989, I think, have to be
fitted with belts.
Nowadays, some charter bus/coach operators claim that some
schools/customers will only charter your coach if you have
the belts on.
But however, it's voluntary to the passenger and there was big
controversy when a boy died on a coach on his way back to his seat from
the toliet, and of course he couldn't have belts on.
I guess the whole issue is different on buses and coaches, as
people tend to travel much shorter distances on buses.
Article 8: (Request 2)
如要從保護乘客安全上看，除了在坐位加上安全帶外，車上的企位也
要取消吧? :)
Article 9:
Re: 新巴8與8P
rt.690 吳佩慈 Fans (kyy690@netvigator.com) from hhtam002083.netvigator.com at Sun Sep 6 23:24, 1998 said:
> Edward Shum (edshum@hkstar.com) said:
>
> 非繁榮時段8號6-8分鐘一班，這時要適當運用2A的功能，用它的班次
> 與8號做成一個平衡。
>
> 我深深覺得新巴8P成功與否，關鍵取決於8號。一條線表面上的勝利
> 是沒用的，在其整體線系得到正面益處才算成功。
小弟認為,如果8P轉全日,8仔可以減些少班次至13-20min,但應改行長命斜
2、2A要加班加冷馬,通常8仔客的來自於銅鑼灣、灣仔,8P轉全日o的客仔
客觀上都會改搭8P,如果去其他地方可搭2、2A.
轉搭8P,如果去
Article 9: (Request 1)
如果8P改行柴灣斜路及轉全日,應該同8X一樣,全線行冷馬
Article 10:
Re: 土 炮 富 豪 全 面 回 廠
LM3 (angela05@netvigator.com) from imsp037.netvigator.com at Sun Sep 6 23:04, 1998 said:
> Hanvas 漢 華 (hanvas@netvigator.com) said:
> 今 日 入 機 場 ，
> 當 經 過 城 巴 東 涌 廠 時 ，
> 發 覺 大 量 土 炮 富 豪 B6 擺 廠 ，
> 而 機 場 島 內 仲 係 連 影 都 冇 !
> 唔 知 港 島 有 冇 同 樣 情 況 出 現 呢 ?
大量土炮在港島----47A,48
Article 10: (Request 1)
仲有3B,29R
John--2100
Article 11:
[廣告] Hong Kong Buses 巴士迷版本
Ken Fung (kenf@hkstar.com) from 202.68.58.226 at Mon Sep 7 12:42, 1998 said:
Hong Kong Buses 巴士迷版本 正式開幕, 內容與先前
Hong Kong Buses 差別不大, 卻有以下改變:
* 版面設計
* 回復 每週一相 (希望唔再甩字軌. :P )
* 加上 商業一台 八月五日 雷霆民意 節目 訪問運輸處, 新巴,
城巴.
Ken
Article 11: (Request 1)
香港巴士中文版上面那個link(English Normal Version)錯左,
連番去中文版的.
Article 12:
[問]中巴最後的廣告 及 15xx 系列.
DA54 (da54@netteens.net) from 202.67.229.57 at Mon Sep 7 03:52, 1998 said:
問題1) 請問中巴最後上的廣告是哪架呢？
問題2) 請問城巴 15xx 單層 Man 共有多少架呢？
問題3) 請問 15xx 的長闊高是多少呢?
多謝協助！
已發現字軌表有兩人只按submit不改資料, 而各線更新時間極接近...
Article 12: (Request 1)
ML44, Kwong On Bank. (This bus have this advertisement
about 6/98)
Article 13:
Re: <廣告>巴士資訊網
Rick (chopchoi@hknet.com) from 202.67.219.67 at Sun Sep 6 22:52, 1998 said:
> John--2100 (jmtng@hknet.com) said:
> 巴士資訊網現己加入與該路線有關的相片
>
> 己加入相片的路線有:
> 城巴:1,3B,5,5A,5B,8x,12A,37A/37B,780,788
> 新巴:8,13,78,84M
>
> 請多多指教!
> 巴士資訊網----永遠向前,日日創新
> John--2100
除此之外，隧巴103, 182,
九巴30X 等都加了有關路線的相片
請多多指教，提供你們寶貴的意見。
ME1(好久沒有用這代表車了)
Article 14:
點解冇人講今年某會遊河?
Eddie Lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) from hkbu068.hk.linkage.net at Sun Sep 6 21:54, 1998 said:
之前鬧到面紅耳赤o既某網頁所舉行o既牛河,
情況如何呢? 有冇人講下呢?
PS1. 題目個年字應為日字.
PS2. 真係有咁o岩有咁橋下面篇文又係講呢樣野, 大家回下面條 thread 啦.
Article 14: (Request 1)
會唔會係搞唔成, 私底下同參加者聯絡押後呢?
(純個人揣測.)
--
車匙!
Article 15:
Re: 我們忘記了「字軌」的意義嗎？
1010 (schneide@netvigator.com) from hhtun029245.netvigator.com at Sun Sep 6 22:07, 1998 said:
> Colin Chang (kalim@netvigator.com) said:
> 我最近收到一封電郵，謂94A線已有幾部車轉了字軌，但我未有更
> 新，暗示我辦事不力，「生人霸死線」。
係0米LV121,LV9呀...好似係黃廠後傋離wor.
我覺得94A係加0左車,但唔代表落了字軌.
請問村長94A係0米加0左車呢?
唔通加了LV121而死0甘d.
> 好似以前曾經有人向我提過LV20係4號字軌車，當時，我仍發覺LV20
> 連續一星期響4號線出現，但後來睇一睇中巴份字軌表，發覺LV20原
> 來係黃廠士啤車。如果我當時唔小心一o的，加o左LV20落去，豈不是
> 誤導板友？
順便想問問村長現在黃廠後傋有0羊車?
SF4,SF22,LV20,LV9,LV121...仲是不是呢?
同埋我想問問4號加了邊部LV呀?
> 新巴接手中巴路線不足一星期，字軌仍然混亂，如果只係「日日見到
> 咩就寫咩上去」，咁我地係咪忘記o左「字軌」o既意義呢？
'今日唔知聽日事,VA行4X都唔奇'
我諗0甘做你跳樓都唔掂Lu..^_^
> 可唔可以，俾o的時間俾我地班原中巴路線字軌表負責人？
加油呀村長!
同一條村大的
Schneider
1010
Article 16:
致板主,有關字軌表負責人手冊
金魚 (n960@hkabc.net) from ppp253084.hkabc.net at Mon Sep 7 17:13, 1998 said:
本人覺得,自從加多一個字軌表負責人手冊後,
個字軌表好似比以前load慢左,
所以,本人希望Ken Fung將字軌表負責人手冊
用另外一個位寫,不須好似現時,要等load完字軌表負責人
手冊後才出現字軌表.
(P.S.:板主,請保重身體)
九巴58系及261B字軌表負責人
金魚字 HS7872 HU7872
Article 17:
新巴話每兩星期檢討路線
Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) from hhtam005137.netvigator.com at Mon Sep 7 13:47, 1998 said:
剛才聽ATV news，據新巴所講乘客量較中巴有5%增長。另外亦話
每兩星期檢討屬下路線，例如更改行車路線、以及增加冷氣車等。
如果屬實，對港島居民係一大好事！
Article 18:
廣告:新巴相
Humphrey (humplaw@netvigator.com) from imsp038.netvigator.com at Mon Sep 7 11:30, 1998 said:
蝴蝶村巴士總站加入新巴網頁.
九月一日剪綵,今日開幕.
內容有新巴的第一天,及正式啟行的相片等,希望大家有空參觀
給我一些意見.
新巴
Article 19:
[WA]Transperth Fleet News
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) from dial000.upnaway.com at Mon Sep 7 17:15, 1998 said:
The following Renault PR 100-2 buses have been converted into CNG powered buses:
Fleet Number: 1028
Registration number: TP1028
Operator: PATH Transit
Fleet Number: 1057
Registration Number: TP1057
Operator: PATH Transit
Another four Renault PR 100-2 buses (622, 1027, 1029 and 1069) have received similar conversions for a few months already.
Article 20:
[廣告]好耐冇賣廣告的：交通網絡轉車站
anthony LAM (lsf@hknet.com) from 202.67.234.92 at Sun Sep 6 23:36, 1998 said:
交通網絡轉車站是一個搜集了本港絕大部份巴士網頁網址的網頁，
已經上網近半年，有近乎五千人來過，唔知大家有冇去過呢？
http://hello.to/bus
Article 21:
支持你的巴士公司: 星網投票
龍神丸 (clement@hkplanet.com) from hkpa05.polyu.edu.hk at Sun Sep 6 23:28, 1998 said:
遊雲中發現有投票, 名為:
你 最 喜 歡 哪 一 間 巴 士 公 司 ？
快投票!
Article 22:
(廣告)--狄克運輸網加新巴, 中巴和城巴相!
B-2051 (dickson2@macau.ctm.net) from c28line16.macau.ctm.net at Sun Sep 6 22:31, 1998 said:
狄克運輸網的狄克相集現已重新開放, 而且剛推出了香港巴士相集 (2).
http://macau.ctm.net/~dickson2/transports.html
B-2051
Article 23:
【網頁】「巴」全集加VA64,ML25,DC4等相
MC1 (n7136579@netvigator.com) from hhttnt01241.netvigator.com at Sun Sep 6 22:00, 1998 said:
「巴」相集今日加入巴士相多張,包括:
中巴:AC4764,DC4,MB14,MC4,ML2,ML25
龍運:HN3185
而今週大相為VA64.
「巴」線集則提供了以下路線的詳細資料:
中隧路線:113
「巴」全集
MC1
Article 24:
今日個九鐵牛河點樣?
EV9984型巴士病毒 (wcc941306@pilot.school.net.hk) from imsp037.netvigator.com at Sun Sep 6 21:47, 1998 said:
前一陣有個巴士團體計劃於今日搞個巴士遊河,
我想問佢地最後有冇搞到?如有的話去o左邊度?詳
情怎樣?
我睇見個活動好似突然消失o左,所以有此問.
Article 25:
113的歷史
古競豪 (fatku@school.net.hk) from blue.alumni.cuhk.edu.hk at Sun Sep 6 20:35, 1998 said:
113在哪時開線?
一開始用MUD車?
Article 26:
Re: VA59車頭無左'China Motor Bus'！
T.P.T. (dckk@netteens.net) from hkpu15.polyu.edu.hk at Mon Sep 7 17:31, 1998 said:
> LM3 (angela05@netvigator.com) said:
> 今日在Causeway Bay 見到架VA59，車頭無左“China Motor Bus'
> 唔知點解？何時開始？其他的是否這樣？
前陣子都有板友講過啦! 用黑色貼紙貼住China Motor Bus字嘛.
呢幾日忙過暑假好多既.....
T.P.T.
Article 27:
新巴AIRPORT線新建議
MIGUEL (johnnywc@netteens.net) from imsp039.netvigator.com at Mon Sep 7 17:35, 1998 said:
新巴話要整二條機場線, 一條由南區, 一條由小西灣, 其實小西灣果條遲早摺, 不如整條由STANLEY 去AIRPORT, OK?
Article 28:
[問]Corgi Olympian 模型
William (William.Lau@xtra.co.nz) from p17-m31-mdr1.dialup.xtra.co.nz at Mon Sep 7 17:25, 1998 said:
1.請問龍運的兩部11M Olympian AND 九巴11M AV 模型何時出?
2.請問VA12, D4 & 2200 的現价?
3.將有什么新的模型出?
From a bus fan who lives in New Zealand
Article 29:
[問]各述語 & [討論]密龍,你係得既!
Jacky,ML1,S3BL268 (jackyyng@hkschool.net) from bootes.hkschool.net at Mon Sep 7 17:46, 1998 said:
首先問下:
掛牌車
字軌車
打仗車
上述表示些甚麼?
今朝,我見到一架FX6545的密龍行32,而且有幸上到
呢班車!嘩!架車好正呀!D通風好勁呀!仲有D內龍用
白色,有舒服的感覺!不過,D偈聲同CT奧黏一樣!
你估點解?
^_^Jacky
Article 29: (Request 1)
掛牌車是指該車日日都是行走該線的巴士
其實掛牌車和字軌車一樣解釋,
因新巴是講字軌車,而九巴就講掛牌車
金魚字 HS7872 HU7872
Article 30:
巴士界大事(截至9月初)
ATR3&3AD52 (m0823@netfront.net) from ppp153.netfront.net at Mon Sep 7 18:20, 1998 said:
大家認為截至9月初,巴士界發生過邊十件大事呢?
請提出
Article 31:
Re: 討厭! 英皇道?traffic jam!
C.K. (syhung@netvigator.com) from hhtck007089.netvigator.com at Mon Sep 7 18:22, 1998 said:
> TONY (s614671@netvigator.com) said:
> I took route 671 at 3:00pm today and I used more than half hour
> to pass King's Road from Tin Hau to Quarry Bay!
> 討厭!
梗係啦!8號同8X果D車又長又多,淨係呢兩條線都塞死你啦!
先兩日搭過金色巴士的C.K.
Article 32:
(建議)278p,北區龍運rt.,新龍運rt
ATR3&3AD52 (m0823@netfront.net) from ppp153.netfront.net at Mon Sep 7 18:16, 1998 said:
278p轉全日就唔睇好架拉,因為E條線只有早,晚有多客
下午及其他非繁忙時間就聽拍烏(ying),AM行都唔多惦
機場Dart就幾好,夠豪華 :p
北區龍運都唔多睇好,客量少,兜路極都有限,去機場o既
路線又麻煩,兩頭唔到岸!!(大Lam 及吐露港)
反為我有新線建議!!!就是開條E15或A15,由九龍塘MTR<-->機場
由龍,城合營,方便北區,乜區,物物區...又可以方便同志由深圳
落泥再去機場,幾方便!!
以上只是個人意見
請討論
Article 33:
271部份司機不負責任
71B (hangk@netvigator.com) from hhttnt01156.netvigator.com at Mon Sep 7 18:13, 1998 said:
早上271司機曾X,和卓X國,
乘坐兩人駕駛的271,
多次刻意增加行車時間,
大家留意.
Article 34:
新巴城巴決戰東區
MIGUEL (johnnywc@netteens.net) from imsp013.netvigator.com at Mon Sep 7 17:47, 1998 said:
講真, 城巴拿O左780, 788, 加上原有的8X, 表面上絕對WIN梗!, 相反, 新巴只有二條線, 一條左穿右插, 一條只係繁忙時間的線, 但基本上那一區由東至西的線已經接近飽和, 加上102及118這二條東區骨幹潛水線又係城巴的! 這樣又和壟斷有甚麼分別!
Article 35:
LM7的啟示:每一架舊巴,都不能成為一架新巴?
Gakei! (gakei@netvigator.com) from hkpu15.polyu.edu.hk at Mon Sep 7 18:51, 1998 said:
翻油後的 LM7, 仍採用中巴 '上奶黃下藍' 的顏色,
只是沒有黑線, 和藍奶黃間的分界線改為貼著下層車
窗的頂部. 那麼是否意味中巴二手車都不回改油新巴
的色彩? 會否只有冷氣車才會翻油新巴色?
--
見到 LM7 傍晚走 '05A' 的
車匙!
