19980522




Articles on 22th May, 1998.

Today's Articles: 80.


Articles' Numbers: (19980522_01-80)





Article 1:

Re: 新城隧線:32M特 :P


Kwan (SFAC3A09@NETVIGATOR.COM) at Thu May 21 21:15, 1998 said:


> AV89 (ngpt@netvigator.com) said:


> 於一九九八年初,余友鍾鋒x於石圍角乘32M之葵芳.其車於荃錦誤進歧路,


> 往沙田速去也.遂於沙田鄉事會路調頭,原路返,小半時辰多才到


> 葵芳矣.


>


> 噫!32M站長忙極也!汝知否其時32M柯打多少車?


>


> 文言文半桶水的AV89





邊個付那十元隧道費?唔通個司機走去用易通咭?


個司機相信面對非常嚴重的後果,班搭客唔投訴才怪.


Article 2:

新線新線


DEL PIERO (johnnywc@netteens.net) at Fri May 22 10:46, 1998 said:


297P應該改為297, 全日行走, 行一D98D上東九龍走廊後不行經的地方, 例如馬頭圍道, 太子道, 觀塘道等等, 儘量避開98C, 98D AND 93K的地頭, 班次可以疏DD, 20-25分鐘一車, OK?


Article 3:

Daimler D 重現江湖


PTC (bc_cly@stu.ust.hk) at Fri May 22 09:28, 1998 said:





司機門



窗口位






各位覺得似唔似60年代o既 Daimler D呢?


有乜破綻可以一睇就知唔係香港Daimler D? (除o左鬼面罩)





好想上廣州影Daimler D o既PTC


Article 4:

Re: How many?


Cummins LT10 (cumminsl@netvigator.com) at Thu May 21 22:38, 1998 said:


> Aqua6138 (tsesh@hkstar.com) said:


> How many buses have the same register number?

EG. AB123, BS123 , DD111, CC111.....etc







1.DK319(3N)




HA319(3AV)




Continue...




---




Aqua who spead 4000 to buy Nokia6138







59A FF418-AL114


59X GH418-AV86





Cummins LT10


Article 4: (Request 1)

EG. AB123, BS123 , DD111, CC111.....etc





1.DK319(3N)


HA319(3AV)


Continue...


---


Aqua who spead 4000 to buy Nokia6138





I am sorry , I never heard that the registation number HA319


is 3AV , I think HA319 is a AV , it runs on R.300 at few


months ago .





LA11 Shing FF7869


Article 4: (Request 2)

In 680 today!


---


Aqua


Article 4: (Request 3)

> 我見過DW3733同DW3833,而我記得


> 九巴有兩部786,一部係GF786另


> 一部唔記得左.





S3N---





DS 7114 - 85K 既字軌


DW 7114





卿姐EV 4019


S3N264


VA64


ARticle 4: (Request 4)

九記有:





3N - DD7011 (舊6C掛牌)


AV - GL7011 (30X掛牌)





3BL86 - DH5831


3AD22 - HH5831





S3N60 - DN2444


S3BL470 - GB2444





AV1?? - GZ9444


3AV220 - HD9444


認真多四字!





黃埔十二甲 字


Article 4: (Request 5)

> CZ (97017130j@polyu.edu.hk) said:


>


> 還有 DZ2444 - ML??





當然仲有


DN342 (S3N49)


HB342 (AD290)


HE342 (3AV231)








DN342 同 HB342 仲同時出現o係 35A 添~~





Victor


Article 4: (Request 6)

> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:


>


> That's ML71.


>


> How about this case:


> FP6351:AL146


> GE6351:AV50


> GF6351:AV79





還有:


CW4502:G476


FM4502:AL136


GT4502:ADS79


HK4502:L1





自己(574)被放逐到969的


Pirro Cheung


AV134---GX7696


574---HD9422


510---GW1534


Article 5:

The Best Single Decker 最佳單層巴士


Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Thu May 21 18:31, 1998 said:


Among the different types of single-deckers used by HK's franchised operators, which model do you like the most? Why?


在香港現有的各款專利單層巴士中,哪一款你最喜歡﹖為什麼﹖


Article 5: (Request 1)

I choose:


Man NL262 (1501)


It's beautiful and special!





CityMan 2500


Article 5: (Request 2)

> DC1 (jacobc@netvigator.com) said:


>


> 1) Dennis Dart SLF (KMB)


> 2) Dennis Lance


> 3) Volvo B6LE


>


> DC1





Your choices are very interesting, as you claim yourself to be DC1 but none of your choice is DC1!





100 Wong (who always supported KMB route 100!)


Article 5: (Request 3)

My choice would be the B6LE with the ALX 200 body(1312-1321).


The body is very interesting and the seats are very comfortable.





CTB12


Article 5: (Request 4)

Dennis Lance -- Dennis is my favoutire, got to put it in the first place.


Renault PR100.2/100.3/180.2


Nice suspension, close to silent engine, cool Voith gearbox gear changes.


MAN SL/NL 202, 16.240 and all others


Real nice, sharp engine noise, tough suspension a bit rough


Article 5: (Request 5)

My choice would be CTB's latest batch of Volvo B6LE, with its SLF design, dual doors for boarding/alighting conveniences, and powerful engine.





(I remember the first time I took a B6LE on Cotton Tree Drive, the bus sped up and beat the hell out of all CMB hotdog, and some private cars with no sweat!)





100 Wong


Article 5: (Request 6)

I'd like


1.Dennis Lance


2.Volvo B10M


3.Scania???





S3BL390


Article 5: (Request 7)

> 小丸子VA51 RT.106 小西灣 (k5959585@hkschool.net) said:


>


> I like the HK bus is CMB Dennis Dart 9.8 and


> KCRC Volvo B10M or Dennis Dart SLF!





九巴AN型單層巴士,因為係載客量最多的單層巴士。


>


>


> 家裏巴士第一服務公司主席用家:


> VA51 TONG HN8481


> (LV97 CM7009)


>


>


Article 5: (Request 8)

DENNIS Dart with manual gearbox. 6-speed, the most powerful Dart...





Gunsmith


Article 5: (Request 9)

My Opinion:





Dennis Dart with Northern Country Body


esp. KCRC 501-503





現代王莽-ICQ:5228542


S3BL424 (FP8329)


KCR 503 (GN5032)


Article 6:

Re: 最令人討厭的巴士--都城


風間火月 (adagatha@netvigator.com) at Fri May 22 12:13, 1998 said:


> 巴士小子 (97480358@plink.cityu.edu.hk) said:


> 如題


> 我覺得都城無論外形及性能都不討好





唔係呀!我覺得幾好!尤其是MK I的高低擋風玻璃同ML2的車身!


性能嘛,行93A果批就不在話下!有次我見有架780的MB(唔知點解有MB),


頂晒閘在長命車都過到架半空8X的龍,你話好唔好?





(話時話,我見780用MB都R晒頭...)





>


> 加上聲音刺耳 令人見到也不願上車!!





九記有成170架比佢更刺耳的3AD係街行啦!又唔見有人唔上車?





AS3/AV112 風間火月


(24/5,齊投票)


Article 6: (Request 1)

我就覺得都普, 亞記同MCW三大車身中, 以MCW APOLLO MK.II


為最形. 不過, 窗就太大了, 除開二為可開趟的, 入風位置


較少. 所以在夏天就熱, 冬天就一流


咁又唔係O既, 可能先入為主啦, 我幾喜歡呢種聲 :>


Article 6: (Request 2)

> Claymon (wang5@hknet.com) said:


> 外形方面, 我又覺得唔錯.


> (暫時只講中巴)


我覺得MCW(無論中,九及KCR)的外型都幾得意, 而我覺得MCW


有個特別之處, 就是採用原廠車身.





> 對於一個當時日日坐LV, DS回家的人,


> 突然有機會坐MB, MC, 的確不當聲音刺耳是一回事.


> 況且又係o個句, 唔關都城事架喎!


MB,MC簡直是'豪華熱狗', 柔軟座椅, 柔軟懸掛系統已經令人


感覺得舒適, 昨晚我搭914的MB33, 在彌敦道及西隧內飛馳,


十分舒暢.


Article 6: (Request 3)

中巴的MB,MC那類的外形則真是不太好,故現在不少雖超過廿年車齡,


但比LF的車身更殘,為何中巴以前不換它們的車身?





其他系列的都城外形都算合格,且越後代越好





聲音都算刺耳,但比雞鴨寶好好多了!(不見車長有投訴)





F-stephen


Article 6: (Request 4)

外形問題大家唔同意見就無得講.


但車身殘...... 會唔會同無翻油有關?


Article 6: (Request 5)

外形呢, 我淨係覺得樓上座位矮過 D 窗咁多, 又整兩支鐵嚮度, 真係會


影響欣賞風景架. 挨住佢訓覺就好!


妙趣妙趣! 聲音刺耳就唔上車? 又係鍾意同自己鬥氣?


寶琳道果 D 勁野一流喎....當你係坐上客見到其他廢柴一架一架咁俾自己架車


不斷拋離, 好有快感架.


Article 6: (Request 6)

> 德褔5D (97089033d@polyu.edu.hk) said:


>


> 絕對有同感。


>


> 除了那把刺耳的剎車聲之外,小弟還覺得她在上斜的表現麻麻(除了


> 那批TURBO外),自從雞消失於屯門公路後,她便成為屯門公路


> 上的弱者,往往成了被爬頭的目標。現在有了3AD在屯門公路行都


> 叫好D,有時在上斜的時候都爬過3AD頭,但轉頭就被架3AD追


> 過,唉!


>


> 當搭68X如果上正架都城11米,隨時被下班或再下班車追過,小


> 弟做過多次弱者後,決定以後在繁忙時間唔在坐都城嘉慕,反正坐下


> 班車時間可能仲快,為乜要坐都城呢!?


>


但中巴的ML表現很好,師傅們都很喜歡.


Article 7:

Re: ATR on route 1


Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) at Thu May 21 21:05, 1998 said:


> 100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) said:


> According to Mr. C.Y. Chan's Hong Kong Bus Handbook, KMB Second Edition, ATR1 served on route 'plain' 1 as shown on the cover.


>


> Did this really happened? (I couldn't see anyone on board beside the driver and Mr. Chan!)


> Has ATR served on any other route other than 1A? (Did it serve on 116 once?)






Would you please observe the registration plate of the


vehicle in the photo again?





--


Gakei!


Article 7: (Request 1)

> 100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) said:


> Are you suggesting it was a computer graphics trick? Please tell me the answer rather than keeping me in suspense!






Can you see it is the 'TRIDENT' plate instead of 'HJ 2127'?


Article 7: (Request 2)

> 100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) said:


>


> So are you suggesting it was 'on test'?





Precise.





>If so, why 'T' license plate wasn't used?





Can't you see the Trade licence is situated inside


the windscreen above the 'DENNIS' plate?





> Please be precise in your answer so I can stop wasting time to 'guess' what is the correct answer! Otherwise you'd blame me for making the wrong assumption!





It is a general knowledge that a bus with an invalid


registration mark (TRIDENT?!) cannot be used for carrying


passengers :)





--


Gakei!


Article 7: (Request 3)

First of all, thanks for your response!


>


> Can't you see the Trade licence is situated inside


> the windscreen above the 'DENNIS' plate?


>


Yes, I was too dump to notice the 'semi' hidden 'T' license plate on the dash.


>


> It is a general knowledge that a bus with an invalid


> registration mark (TRIDENT?!) cannot be used for carrying


> passengers :)


>


Of course, this is true! I was dump not to notice the plate being placed inside the dashboard, but I wasn't so dump not to figure out this rule.





I did thought the 'T' license should be placed at somewhere much more visible than where it was in the photo.





Also, if a bus is not in service, shouldn't the destination board displays 'Private' or simply 'blank' instead of a true destination along with a proper route number? Otherwise many passengers (like my mom) who care less about either the semi-hidden 'T' license or 'Trident' license might mistake the bus was in service, and it just 'skipped' stops without proper reason! Which eventually may draw a complaint!





I guess you could of answer my question in one sentence as 'The bus was only testing by KMB, as noted by the 'Trident' license plate and 'T' license plates placed within the dash.' instead of wasting time (both yours and mine) and resources on HKBDB. (as you always concern!)





100 Wong


Article 7: (Request 4)

> Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) said:


>


> Initially I don't realised that it is necessary to 'draw


> the bowel for a picture'.





I guess you can't 'assume' everybody is as smart as you are! (otherwise the question wouldn't be asked in the first place!)





Just in case you missed my modification, do you have anything to say about a bus carrying a proper destination with a route number but not serving any passenger?





100 Wong


Article 8:

Re: 今日3N訓練車操 E41


HC9918 (lch@chevalier.net) at Thu May 21 23:41, 1998 said:


> 沙電學徒 (ranger@hknet.com) said:


> 小弟今日路過大埔運動場(近大埔頭路)時,看見好幾部3N在此試車,原來


> 這裡就是將來 E41 大埔頭巴士總站,今日我跟了一位相孰的師傅行了一


> 部份路,由此去經大埔頭路,汀太路,汀角路,安慈路,安祥路,寶鄉街,廣幅道


> 運頭街,南運路,達運路,運頭塘巴士站,達運路,南運路,于是我係廣幅


> 下車,個師傅話將來E41 會行以上的路,吾停沙田直往机場,于6月開辦


又會唔行大埔中心, 唔通個度冇坑?


Article 8: (Request 1)

>運頭塘巴士站


真係經運頭巴士站!!!


0甘我以後咪日日見到TRIDENT!!


正!....不過,個站好似好難入12M車?


>,達運路,南運路,于是我係廣幅


> 下車,個師傅話將來E41 會行以上的路,吾停沙田直往机場,于6月開辦


Article 8: (Request 2)

> Where is E41 terminal? Is it in Tai Po Centre? Because I think one of the bus lane which for parking 72X will give 307 or E41 to park!





307自己有獨立坑


Article 8: (Request 3)

沙電學徒 (ranger@hknet.com) said:


> E41在大埔頭做總站是因為大埔中心巳冇位容立此線,大埔頭總站位於


> 大埔頭路,即(太湖花圓,大埔運動場)一帶,是有2條坑的巴士總站.O個


> 道個位影巴士都好正架!!





我想問下龍躉同富豪會用咩名o既膠牌呢?


Article 8: (Request 4)

> eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:


>


> 我想問下龍躉同富豪會用咩名o既膠牌呢?





是用[大埔頭]牌,因為有一次做TRIDENT車時,我手很得齊去佼牌,無意中


佼到*大埔頭 Tai Po Tau*三個字,是冇大埔中心的.








E41 大埔頭--新机場


Article 9:

呢度可幫你!


Dennis Lau (ss78k@netteens.net) at Thu May 21 16:28, 1998 said:





> 小丸子VA51 rt.106 小西灣 (k5959585@hkschool.net) said:


> 請問,龍記E33由邊個總站去赤角呢?


> Exacuse me!the LWB rt.E33 where the station is


> go to the Chep Lap Kok?


>


>


> 小西灣巴士鑒測助理..


> VA51 TONG HN8481


> (LV97 CM7009)





You can go here to see about rt.E33!





Dennis Lau


Article 9: (Request 1)

> TONY(S3M61) (wclui@vtech.net) said:


>


> E33是由屯門市中心往返赤立角的


>


>





E33會於1998年5月26日啟航(九巴


27454466的識員說的)





飛機竺


Article 9: (Request 2)

> 屯門之友 (chung921@hkstar.com) said:


> 係剌都唔知邊個話E33明天開!


> 攪到我今天去屯中總站睇下,點知乜都冇,站牌又冇,排隊欄又冇


> 白行一趟





龍運本來話E33是22/5開


今日21/5的消息,又話改為26/5開





即是延期





有時未正式出通告的事


可能會更改,九巴時常有





STANLEY YUNG


Article 9: (Request 3)

我今日放學都走去屯中睇下,見到乜都冇,


所以先打去九巴問.





飛機竺


(Ps:屯門之友呀,我個ICQUin係6480114)


Article 10:

Re: 傳單


eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) at Thu May 21 18:13, 1998 said:


AV89 (ngpt@netvigator.com) said:


> 請問那裏有63系,E33的單張[手羅]?





近排落雨, 我睇都唔會掛咁多單張出黎架喇....


就算有, 一早俾 D 賤賊剪走晒啦, 仲等你咩.


Article 10: (Request 1)

華都站有一疊,但經今日落雨之後.......


E33就仲未出.


(PS:我有22張63M,63X,如果你要


Send Mail給我)





今日轉用PF768的


飛機竺


Article 10: (Request 2)

我今朝入元朗探朋友,o係元朗(西)個站長室度


取走十張無'穿窿'o既269B,269C單張.


(如想要就ICQ俾我)





上星期開始轉用PCS StarTAC,兼一個人上兩個台煲粥o既


Tony(GB2444
)


ICQ:8791015


Article 10: (Request 3)

> Aqua (tsesh@hkstar.com) said:





>WA~ no need take so much ma...~~, Because the people like >you, make many Bus Fans can't get this notice! Sorry if I >hurt your heart ---





>Aqua who is playing my phone (Nokia 6138)! Ha the games >are good!





唔係我拎的,係上次個派紙仔叔叔俾的,


我問佢拎兩張,佢俾我22張.而我亦都會


mail給想要但又拎唔到的人.





聽緊我這樣愛你的


飛機竺


Article 11:

[討論] 如何減少新巴士線單張被大批偷走


wp12a (gw7112li@netvigator.com) at Thu May 21 22:36, 1998 said:


大欖隧道新線開檔, 呢個老爺問題又要擺出o黎!





始終都有班 '巴士迷敗類' (或者根本唔係巴士迷, 係破壞份子!) 專門


鍾意 '沙' 站頭綁住成紮o既新線單張, 其實[手羅]一兩張 (或者幫朋友


拎多三兩張) 就夠, 撻晒成疊一百幾十張做乜?





- 有價值, 炒得起?


- 呢班係 '巴士敵人' , 唔俾D客知有條新線開?





派單張有兩個方法: (i) 就咁紮響站頭任人拎; (ii) 搵專人返工放工


時間響大站派.





第一種方法慳水慳力, 但係完全冇得控制, 呢頭擺響度, 三幾分鐘後撻晒


都冇人理.


第二種方法就要o徙人手, 不過小弟估冇乜賊仔會面皮厚到問人要成疊,


流失去D '唔應[手羅]咁多o既人手上' o既機會大大減少.





請問各位仲有乜o野方法, 防止D新線傳單短時間內流失/偷走?





可以由派發方式, 或者由'斷絕二手傳單市場'兩方面諗o下.





黃埔十二甲 字


Article 11: (Request 1)

掛0係錢箱或車長位旁邊啦﹒等搭開條線0既客上車時順便[手羅]張﹐


我覺得呢班客一定要知有乜改動﹐所以係最需要呢D通告﹒


Article 11: (Request 2)

How about installing boxes right next to the entrance door to hold


the flyers (advertisement)? Only problem is that the flyers have to be


folded to save space.





I copy this idea from the MBTA (~3000 vehicles) in Boston.





y k


Article 11: (Request 3)

可改由站長亭派發,吾用掛傳單方式內派,方法是站長將傳單在放在亭


內,貼一張告示在乘客當眼位置,如相取傳單可在此[手羅].既環保,又


方便一O的想乘該線的乘客.


Article 11: (Request 4)

都咪話我搵番 D 陳皮野出黎講丫, 以前有位小朋友板友嚮出面撻晒成疊百幾張


某西隧線單張返屋企, 跟住仲貼文話自己點叻點叻, 又話係佢有冇人有, 最後


俾咪人插到背脊開花, 從此俾人鄙視囉.


又唔見有人賣喎...


梗唔係啦, 咪又係果種幼稚思想, 以為人冇佢有, 好威嘛.


最好就貼一張底一張面落乳豬盤, 咁就人人可睇. 派就去站長室派, 或者


沙田九記服務站派.


我真係未見過有 D 咁野炒....可能太過普遍啦, 就算一個人/集團壟斷晒,


都唔會貴得去邊啦, 賣相仲好搵啦.


Article 12:

Re: 忽發奇想


eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) at Thu May 21 23:28, 1998 said:


VA51‧塞米一條‧錠真治 (parnell@hkstar.com) said:


> 我唔知自己係咪食飽飯無野想,因此想起以下的亂切:


> 1:)配都普車身的Volvo Olympian


> 2:)配亞力生大車身的Dennis Dart


> 3:)配亞力生大車身的Dennis Dragon/Condor(空調版)





4. 配 Volgern 車身o既 Trident.


5. 配 Plaxton 車身o既 Trident.


6. 配 Duple Metsec o既 Man.


Article 12: (Request 1)

> Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) said:


>


> Dennis Dart 可配 Alexander Dash 車身.





How about using an Alexander PS or ALX200/300 body instead?


Article 12: (Request 2)

PS 好似比較長, o岩 LANCE 多o的, ALX 就梗係o岩 ... SLF 啦.


Article 13:

Re: 269B 和 269C 消息


R Lai (raymansc@asiaonline.net) at Thu May 21 19:04, 1998 said:


> G374(CS 7071) (ckng@ee.cuhk.edu.hk) said:


> 在元朗(西)和天瑞總站有269B及269C的


> 單張.現把內容簡報如下:


>


> 269B 天水圍市中心 - 紅磡碼頭


>


> 天水圍開出 : 05:30 - 23:20


> 紅磡開出 : 06:50 - 00:40


> 繁忙時間班次 : 15 分鐘


>


> 途經 : 天水圍, 元朗, 大欖隧道, 佐敦,


> 尖沙咀, 紅磡.


>


> 269C 天水圍市中心 - 觀塘碼頭


>


> 天水圍開出 : 05:30 - 23:05


> 紅磡開出 : 06:25 - 00:30


觀塘開出: 0625: 0030 ?? ( 你有否打錯?)


> 繁忙時間班次 : 13 分鐘


>


> 途經 : 天水圍, 元朗, 大欖隧道, 黃大仙,


> 彩虹, 九龍灣, 牛頭角, 觀塘.


>


>


> 另外,現時在元朗,天水圍沿途還未換站,在


> 天瑞總站有有關大欖隧道線安排的彩色單張


> 索取.


>


>


> ANDY C.K.NG


Article 13: (Request 1)

Benjamin (patben@netvigator.com) said:


>


> It is correct, From Kuwn Tong is 6:25am - 12:30am





好簡單, 即係有 K 廠車囉!


Article 14:

被遺棄的一群(凹頭居民)!


德褔5D (97089033d@polyu.edu.hk) at Thu May 21 23:04, 1998 said:


> G374(CS 7071) (ckng@ee.cuhk.edu.hk) said:


> 今日下午我看見天瑞巴士站有一張手寫的


> 通告,內容謂由5月23日開始,269C,


> 276,276P,277,368,369將


> 不停新港酒店及楊屋村,因此本人相信這些


> 路線將會改路由博愛迴旋處直接上新田公路.


>


> ANDY C.K.NG








乜九記做野咁 o架 ,直至昨日新港酒店外的巴士站都仲未有通告(今


日就唔知),是不是要到取消個站 o個 日先出通告。





唉!我們正是被遺棄的一群!





其實九記反正都用轉車站計劃,點解唔將68M途經青山公路(博愛醫院至


凹頭迴旋處),錦田公路,用高埔村支路上三號幹線。現在,連276/


276P等路線都要改道,小弟明白這是因為道路工程所影響的關係,但都


沒有理由不照顧凹頭居民,這裡的人也要搭車的,但小弟的意思並不是要九


記開條新線去遷就我們。





住在這裡的人並不算多,人們出入多依賴白牌VAN,或行出路口搭小巴、巴


士。自從有了276/276P之後,乘車比以前方便好多,因為搭276/


276P去上水只需要15分鐘,縱使要企去上水,總好過等76K、77K














5D 德褔花園 往 紅磡 (循環線)


車費:$3.5 行車里數:18.1km 行車時間:60min


主力之一DC7456


Article 14: (Request 1)

冇提76K改路喎! 咁係咪話76K唔駛改, 照行紅毛橋?


即係繼續有巴士經中/九/城爛車場啦.





如果係真o既, 凹頭迴旋處就唔駛封. 咁都好, 唔駛所有車谷上


三號幹線, 一條死路落博愛迴旋處塞車!





但番轉頭講, 凹頭迴旋處淨係可以俾行新潭路/入上水支路D車用?


咁就真係奇, 環迴公路就要塞博愛, 行小路就避得開!


即係話, 當年沙埔村迴旋處未拆之前, 76K快過 276/276P o既歷史又重


演!





識路之人又會一到禽獸迴旋處就走出環迴公路, 入番新潭路避車龍啦.


噢, 禽獸迴旋處同新潭路又變另一個樽頸...可惜.





黃埔十二甲 字


Article 14: (Request 2)

該通告是冇寫76K的.








ANDY C.K.NG


Article 15:

Olympian 兩問


Y. F. Yiu, 乜都唔知 (thrbros@netvigator.com) at Thu May 21 16:37, 1998 said:


本人是新加入之板友,在此想問兩條問題:


(一) 城記總共買了幾多 11 米 Olympian (我今日係鴨廠見到1011);


(二) 為何城記將部份 Olympian 之入油位由樓梯位搬到中軸之前?


(三) 請問屯中站長被控單案判 O左未?


如之前已講過,希望大加能不厭其煩答我的問題,多謝!


Article 15: (Request 1)

這批富豪十一米Olympian,為數共有七十部。(951-1020)


Article 16:

Re: The Drive Wheels


海霸﹝N79﹞ (su073@netvigator.com) at Thu May 21 23:40, 1998 said:


> Flying Chuk (chuk@netvigator.com) said:


> BL




> S3BL




> S3V




> AD




> 3AD




> AL




> AV




> ---




> Aqua6138




>


> 你是否想問以下那款巴士'堂'軑最輕呀?


> 我聽司機話Dennis Dragon'堂'軑好輕.


>


> 飛機竺





哈哈,Dennis 真係好輕,除左 Dennis Jubilant!


我都唔明點解,企多個人就要企起身 0黎 扭!


唔通多個 Engine 就會咁?定係佢冇風油「車太」?


唔得,下次唔俾咁多人上車,自己又唔駛咁辛苦,


D 乘客又安全 D!





Terry﹝N79﹞


Article 17:

Re: 路線改全冷,等不等於變相加價?


TONY(S3M61) (wclui@vtech.net) at Thu May 21 21:36, 1998 said:


> M12 (matt4127@netteens.net) said:


> 如題.


> 我本人認為是,因為某些線以前是兩味的,乘客有可選擇,但改全冷後,


> 車費貴了,乘客還少了一個選擇,我覺得對乘客是有影響的.





並不是全部這樣的,以九巴74X比較,以前74X有非空調和空調時


收費分別是$6.20/$8.50(以10/96年前計),但是74X轉全空調後,


反而不加價而減價,這樣對居民來講亦是有好處,如果想搭普通


巴士,可以轉乘74A,也是一樣可以去到終點站。


所以我認為如果改全冷,並非等如變相加價,反而對居民來說是


有利,因為可以改善服務。


Article 17: (Request 1)

74A,74X 倆者根本不能夠比較 , 雖然倆者既總站係官塘碼頭 .


但一條係快線 , 另一條係慢線 . D乘客係想快既話 ,


根本唔會理你係空調定非空調都會照坐 .


依家係有一個催化劑 - 大老山隧道問題 , 先至會將74X轉全空調 .


係D議員話轉全冷都得 , 但要減價 !


鍾意坐冷氣既乘客米覺得抵羅! 唔鐘意坐既米覺得貴 !


話就話改善服務 , 實質上唔駛講都知 .


Article 17: (Request 2)

咁34,34M,234B又點睇?


它們好似是有加無減喎.


Article 18:

Re: Metrobus (MC)


Felix Tse (b1wkca22@pop1.sympatico.ca) at Fri May 22 11:04, 1998 said:


> Robert (roberthk@netvigator.com) said:


> May I asked the same question again.


> Does anyone know why there is a word 'REVERSING' at the


> rear(車尾) near the route number in CMB MC Metrobus?


有人答左你喇。





> Does it work in UK? For what purposes?


英國都有的。我記得原本 XF樓下車尾的車窗對落少少


都有盞紅色的「Reversing」燈架,後尾好多都拆左lo。


咩purpose?咪話俾人知倒緊車0羅!


Article 18: (Request 1)

> 100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) said:


>


> What? You didn't read the responses or something? Anyway, you're fortunate because I saved the discussion earlier, and here it is!


>


> My guess it it 'should' light up whenever the bus is backing up, just like the 'back up' (white) reversing taillights. It's just a larger sign to attract more attention, particularly for pedestrians passing by. Although I've never seen it worked!


> 100 Wong


>


> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Fri May 15 00:37, 1998 said:


>


> Really? I've seen one of that light working when a MB, which has also got that sign, was reversing down there at Mei Foo Terminus while it was serving on route 102.


>


>


> I would believe so, though I can't confirm that!


>


> 100 Wong





In addition to that, it has 'bip bip' sound when it is reversing.


The light 'Reversing'? Of course, it is on when the time it need


to use. Do you know MB and MC class does not have the white


light above the yellow light and below the red light located


at the lower corner of the bus?


Article 19:

Re: Air Condition


100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) at Fri May 22 02:28, 1998 said:


> CityMan 2500 (h9703028@hkusua.hku.hk) said:


> I want to know why there are so many people don't like A/C bus?


> I find that many people on this board don't think that


> A/C bus is the way to provide better service!





I'm very curious as well! Despite the fact I've interviewed with many non-bus fans and personally oberseved situations in which passengers prefer A/C buses!





Maybe they just love their old memories with their beloved hotdogs, thus refuse to accept the idea old buses must go and be replaced by new A/C buses! Although someone did suggest introducing '3V'! (yuck!)





100 Wong (who ALWAYS supports A/C service! No exception!)


Article 19: (Request 1)

> 2007 (newflyer@sympatico.ca) said:


>


> In my opinion, if Hong Kong can use the system same as Eastern Canada,


> then the service of air-conditioned service must be successful.


> Since you may know, Canada's bus service has a flat rate of


> fare, no matter what is air-conditioned or non air-conditioned


> bus, you pay the same! And no matter the distance. You just


> need to get on the last bus before the 90 minutes limitation


> period. In Mississauga, almost all of them are air-conditioned


> bus, and they are still charging two bucks per person and a


> reduced fare even for university student! That is very uncommon


> here except my city, free bus service, no matter air-cond or


> non air-cond during September to April.





I think the reason why bus operators in North America can charge a flat rate for A/C and non A/C buses is because most of them are subsidized by the government, thus even if it loses money by operating A/C bus, these operators aren't responsible to any stockholders at all.





On the other hand, flat rate is also being used in Taipei, where A/C buses are standard issue. Or else look at Macau, such a small place (where residents are perceived to have less income on average than those in Hong Kong) actually offers full A/C service on all of its routes!





I think the main problem for A/C buses in Hong Kong has to do with KMB's fare structures on A/C buses. Think about this, CTB charges $3.4 on its 5B from Kennedy Town all the way to Causeway Bay. What about KMB? Even during non-peak hours, it charges $3.9 for its full A/C bus route B1! Hence those who are living on Hong Kong island can easily accept full A/C service better than those on the other side of the harbour.





Or else I always wonder if minibus and taxis overcharge passengers in winter or provide 'discount' during summer. Nowadays noone would want to board on a 'hotdog' taxi or minibus during the summer! So A/C itself is innocent, only the concerned bus company which overcharges passengers is responsible for the lack of progress in providing more A/C service in Hong Kong. What about MTR, KCR and LRT which offers full A/C service? Are passengers happy? Yes! If noboby wants hotdog MTR within the tunnel, why some bus fan still support the use of hotdog on tunnel routes like 914?





100 Wong


Article 19: (Request 2)

1. 本人贊成行走空氣欠佳地區的路線用全冷,eg,大隧.但其他路線就有所保留.


2. 有些人對某些強度的冷氣會敏感.


3. 現在的空調巴空調系統未完善.


4. 在郊區自然風比冷氣更舒適.


因此,我認為一間好的巴士公司應照顧唔同類別的客人,提供不同選擇


Article 20:

九巴服務, 不提也罷!


Louis (louis@hkabc.net) at Fri May 22 13:10, 1998 said:


> Terence (kapun@asiaonline.net) said:





> 我估指26/5後無車出彌敦道旺角以南及尖東。


> 因為69X改行大欖隧道而不經屯門。


> 九巴力撐話已作出安排,指63X。


> 但由虎地行番嶺南又遠又荒蕪。





如果條天橋起好, 嶺南學生可以直接行到虎地就好少少...





> 我覺得今次改道安排只照顧了元朗市及天水圍。


> 青山公路的需求也不太小,但好像被忽略,犧牲似的。





某程度上, 嶺南學生唔應該只係睇住自己的需要, 因為69X行大欖


始終係方便好多天水圍的市民. 而理論上, 嶺南二千學生裡面有


千五係有宿舍, 五百學生同教職員只會在上下班時間對交通有較


大需求.





> 63M,63X及加班後的67M(加車兩部),67X(加車一部)


> 的班次又不算好密,63X更遲開車早收車。


> 試問沿線居民又會滿意嗎?對他們來說簡直是服務倒退!





自己住慣港島, 覺得九巴在屯門區的服務根本不值一提, 真係太差


了! 中巴都不如! 昨晚在旺角等67X, 又要成四個字... 唉...


希望屯門區的巴士線能盡快開俾其他公司做!














Louis


Article 20: (Request 1)

> Terence (kapun@asiaonline.net) said:


> 頭先聽收音機話有嶺南學生去抗議九巴改道安排。


> 請問有沒有板友知道嶺南事件詳情?


>


> 我估指26/5後無車出彌敦道旺角以南及尖東。


> 因為69X改行大欖隧道而不經屯門。


> 九巴力撐話已作出安排,指63X。


> 但由虎地行番嶺南又遠又荒蕪。





唔止,宜家果度係地盤,大果牌叫人唔好用果條路


,結果係兜路,果度仲有??狂(No clothes!!),對女性


十分danger.





> 我覺得今次改道安排只照顧了元朗市及天水圍。


> 青山公路的需求也不太小,但好像被忽略,犧牲似的。


> 63M,63X及加班後的67M(加車兩部),67X(加車一部)


> 的班次又不算好密,63X更遲開車早收車。


> 試問沿線居民又會滿意嗎?對他們來說簡直是服務倒退!


> 以上是我小小意見。





完全同意。


>


A340


Article 20: (Request 2)

請問邊個台呀?在那抗議?


我知呀!因為 67X只增加一班車,但卻失去21架69X,


雖然我今年畢業,但我卻十分同情嶺南學生。


點解係63X呀?


Article 21:

查詢:怎樣去赤柱軍人墳場?


Terence (kapun@asiaonline.net) at Fri May 22 10:00, 1998 said:


請問若要去赤柱軍人墳場,應該


(1)搭6A/14在黃麻角道近聖士提反海灘行去,


還是(2)搭6/6X/73/260等線在東頭灣道近監獄行去?





另外還想問問搭63由赤柱出銅鑼灣要幾耐?


是否逢每小時正及三十分開出?





希望各位能解答,謝謝。


Article 21: (Request 1)

> 叮噹 (tinghoyi@netvigator.com) said:


> 應該係坐6A/14前往的。如果係坐14的話,你大可以叫車長放你那兒


> 下車,14是可以停在門口的,但如果係城記車的話,就要看看車長的


> 心情了,望到那兒下車便可。


謝謝指教,但城記司機若真的不准我在門口下車,


請問最近的車站又在那裡?


Article 21: (Request 2)

如果城記唔比的話,個站應該係聖士提反灣,或者係一入黃麻


角道就落囉,照小弟記憶,中間仲有一個站,但唔知係邊囉。


註:聖士提反灣個站即係赤柱監獄的後門。


Article 22:

Re: ME永別屯公...


Terence (kapun@asiaonline.net) at Fri May 22 13:21, 1998 said:


> 風間火月 (adagatha@netvigator.com) said:


> 隨著大欖隧道的通車,九記將68系全數改行三號幹線。


> 即是ME攝68系唔會再現(68系全冷馬)。


>


> 哀!ME飛弛於屯公的情景不復再見!想當年雄霸屯公,逢車過車,


> 成為68系的主力,更首創巴士比人影快相的記錄.....


>


> 現在的ME就像比九記放逐去邊彊一樣,行埋堆雞肋線,最多係大埔


> 公路踩快兩步,完全冇高速公路比佢發揮!


>


> 嗚呼!ME永別屯公,一代車皇淪落至此,哀哉!


>


> AS3/AV112 風間火月


> (24/5,齊投票!)





十分同意你的說話。


以前我搭68/68M/68X,若前一班是都城嘉慕,


勝利二型等慢車,下一班又剛好是平治,我


實搭下一班。有次搭68M ME(DG5565)由元朗出


全灣,係洪水橋過上班利蘭冷馬,屯門角


再過前兩班的利柴熱狗,在屯公逢車過車,


很犀利。很可惜以後都沒機會了。


ME淪落得很慘呢。我寧願搭它好過S3M


尤其在68,67M線上,(TUBRO除外)


Article 22: (Request 1)

或者會攝63M呢﹒咁ME物有機會再係屯公一展所長囉﹒





辛格


Article 22: (Request 2)

> 風間火月 (adagatha@netvigator.com) said:


> 現在的ME就像比九記放逐去邊彊一樣,行埋堆雞肋線,最多係大埔


> 公路踩快兩步,完全冇高速公路比佢發揮!





唔使咁傷心,仲有70x,70p,73x俾佢行高速公路!


Article 23:

巴士遊河─新界一日遊


TONY(S3M61) (wclui@vtech.net) at Thu May 21 22:17, 1998 said:





筆者今日想了一條「巴士遊河」,希望給大家參考(歡迎提出


意見):





名稱:新界一日遊(由上水出發):


1)先由上水乘276/276P至天水圍,繼而轉輕鐵720至屯門(參觀屯門


九巴車廠。


2)然後乘E33至東涌,欣賞青嶼幹線及汀九橋壯麗景色*


3)再乘E31至荃灣,再轉乘48X/49X至沙田


4)之後乘299至西貢,轉92至鑽石山,再轉74X至大埔


5)參觀鐵路博物館後,乘70/73/73A至上水止





※這條路線是自已設計的,絕無抄襲成份(皆因筆者曾於三年前試


過,大約用了整個下午)


* 而第二部份在E33線未通車前,可由60M/66M去荃灣


Article 23: (Request 1)

> HC9918 (lch@chevalier.net) said:


> 點解唔搭 E42?





話明「新界一日遊」,應該包括去荃灣,所以如果不去荃灣,


便失去本身的意義。


Article 24:

Re: 陽光有 ROSA?


Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Fri May 22 00:13, 1998 said:


> 417 (96006257@plink.cityu.edu.hk) said:


> 早日去過藍田,見到陽光同生果日報做o既員工車好密,有大量


> COASTER。


>


> 放工時間,見到有架 ROSA。今日再睇 '尋日九記',都淨係有伊蘇蘇


> 同 COASTER。


>


> 究竟係我睇花,定陽光有新車/ 特車/ 借車呢?





較早前曾經有汽車雜誌提過陽光巴士會買Rosa。難道已經交了貨﹖


Article 24: (Request 1)

新Rosa 同 Coaster的分別不是太大, 特別是車頭, 但是你細心看好


容易找到兩者之間的分別, 首先,Rosa 的前輪較前, 因為車頭四有一


個位(可能香港取消了這個位), 而尾燈是圓形的.





Dickson2


Article 25:

中記紙模型


CTB12 (majac@netvigator.com) at Fri May 22 04:02, 1998 said:








今期'便利'個網頁有中記勝利二型同埋


白水箱0既紙模型'單撈',有興趣0既板


友可以去睇下





一本便利





好少貼文0既


CTB12


Article 25: (Request 1)

CTB 12君:


你話你好少貼文,咁你係唔係都好少睇文呢?


呢個消息其實早兩個禮拜前我己經在此報過料,上個禮拜亦有板友提


過。呢次你再提,我知你出於一片分享之心,話俾人聽邊度有紙巴士


「單撈」。不過就「噚」左少少。





我唔你鬧你啊,只不過是話俾各版友知,有乜消息都好,睇睇有冇人


報左料先。免得本版負荷更重。





列治文卑詩省加拿大 CambieNo.4 Rd.


Article 25: (Request 2)

呢篇真係今期'便利'o黎o架! 網上冇o架!





難兄難弟廣州落難





會考戰士巴士迷





花o左成個鐘scan o既PTC


Article 26:

大欖隧道線


G374(CS 7071) (ckng@ee.cuhk.edu.hk) at Thu May 21 20:38, 1998 said:


現把大欖隧道線的彩色單張的路線內容簡報如下:





64M 天耀 - 荃灣地鐵站(繁忙時間班次12分鐘)


途經 天耀,樂湖,賞湖,天慈,大欖隧道,荃灣





68M 朗屏 - 葵盛圍(繁忙時間班次5分鐘)


途經 朗屏,元朗大馬路,大欖隧道,荃灣,葵涌





68X 元朗(東) - 佐敦道碼頭(繁忙時間班次5-6分鐘)


途經 元朗大馬路,大欖隧道,美孚,長沙灣,深水埔,


旺角,油麻地,佐敦


(從單張看來,相信不經朗屏)






69M 天瑞 - 葵芳地鐵站(繁忙時間班次7-8分鐘)


途經 天瑞,翠湖,賞湖,樂湖,天耀,大欖隧道,荃灣,


葵涌






69X 天瑞 - 佐敦道碼頭(繁忙時間班次8分鐘)


/69P? 途經 天瑞,翠湖,賞湖,樂湖,天耀,大欖隧道,美孚,


長沙灣,深水埔,旺角,油麻地,佐敦






269B 天水圍市中心 - 紅磡碼頭(繁忙時間班次15分鐘)


途經 天水圍市中心,麗湖,景湖,美湖,翠湖,天瑞,


賞湖,樂湖,天耀,元朗大馬路,大欖隧道,佐敦,尖沙咀,


紅磡






269C 天水圍市中心 - 觀塘碼頭(繁忙時間班次13分鐘)


途經 天水圍市中心,麗湖,景湖,美湖,翠湖,天瑞,


賞湖,樂湖,天耀,元朗大馬路,大欖隧道,龍翔道,黃大仙,


彩虹,九龍灣,牛頭角,觀塘






968 元朗(西) - 天后(繁忙時間班次6-7分鐘)


途經 元朗大馬路,大欖隧道,西隧,上環,中環,金鐘,


灣仔,銅鑼灣









ANDY C.K.NG


Article 26: (Request 1)

68X唔搬去西站, 有兩個原因:





1. 元朗西個總站相對於東站已經非常擠迫, 條條坑都有線擺, 食飯時間


更加爆棚. 聽講68M條孖坑會俾968駛.





2. 68X若果搬去西站, 就一定要響青山公路東行擺上客站. 咁樣東行D


站仲邊有位去安置呢條大線?所以要保留東站做總站, 響西行線上客,


寧願出o左水邊圍圈返轉頭 (順便做埋水邊圍o既客).





黃埔十二甲 字


Article 27:

九巴會不會跳飛机?


AV89 (ngpt@netvigator.com) at Thu May 21 18:15, 1998 said:


上次架AA2行203,架車去到尖東唔知走左去邊,但個多小時後又返回,


真是r哂頭! 請問203,208的運作時怎樣的? 有冇跳飛机?





另外, 以前100的司机點食飯?





多謝解答! ^_^


Article 27: (Request 1)

有板友說過可能只做單程.


Article 28:

Re: 三號幹線用車一覽


Benjamin (patben@netvigator.com) at Thu May 21 19:23, 1998 said:


> wp12a (gw7112li@netvigator.com) said:


> 據接近車廠消息透露, 5月26日起元朗/天水圍各線用車如下:


>


> 63M - 11米龍+MCW, 11米冷龍3+2位, 用 69M o的車





But some bus drivers said it will use 11m 2+2 a/d





> 63X - 11米康偈龍, 11米冷龍3+2位, 用 69X o的車





Some bus drivers said it will use 12m Dragon


> 64M - 12米冷龍





May not use 12m Dragon, it may use some 11m AD, as the peak


frequenct of 64M is 12min.(according to the new phamplet of


KMB Tai Lam Tunnel network)





> 68M - 11米冷龍+冷豪,3+2位, 用部份 68X o的車





Some bus drivers said it will use 2+2 AD and AV


> 68X - 11米冷龍+冷豪,2+2位, 冷龍好似用番68/68A冷馬車





68X will use 3AD and the new AV, e.g. AV4XX





> 69M - 12米冷龍





Not only 3AD, but the original 2+2 AV





> 69X - 12米冷龍





69X use 3AD will use less than 2+2 AV, 69X wil use 2+2 AV





> 269B - 12米冷龍





Yes


> 269C - 12米冷龍





Yes, it will use 3AD, and half of this will come from Depot-


K, the new members will be 3AD83, 3AD86 and 3AD89(not sure)





> 968 - 11米冷豪2+2位, 冇變





Yes


>


> 同日起, 67M加車兩架, 67X加車一架, 都係熱狗.


>


> 換言之, 冇晒冷馬或熱狗三擔利蘭行元朗/天水圍.


>


> 另外, 因元/天線大量需要3+2位冷豪, 要抽屯門X線多架掛牌3+2位冷


> 豪過來使, 原有字軌換做2+2位全新冷豪.





I think it may not, in these days, the Tin Shui Wai Depot


had already stayed some new 2+2 a/c inside





P.S. The information was come from the messages of some bus


drivers who run the above routes in Tin Shui Wai(The info.


are uncertain)





Benjamin


AD239-GN921


921-GW2858


Article 29:

Re: 巴士識別出0左未


Kwan (SFAC3A09@NETVIGATOR.COM) at Thu May 21 21:26, 1998 said:


> M12 (matt4127@netteens.net) said:


> 如題,巴士識別(講古老巴士果本)出0左未,幾時出?





我都想知,話就話五月出,我訂了貨但仍未收到.


會不會付了錢但收不到貨????


Article 30:

好耐冇見!+問題


Humphrey (humplaw@netvigator.com) at Fri May 22 00:04, 1998 said:


由於考AL關係,冇見大家.


原本想考完試第一次貼文就宣傳我的網頁更新左,點知geocities有問


題,upload 唔到d相.


不過,如果大家有興趣的話


,可以到http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Speedway/7838/bus.htm


另外,唔知近2 個月來有那些homepage搬家/開幕,請email新地址俾我


,thanks!


入正題,請問有那些路線在龍翔道觀景台(往黃大仙方向)有站?thanks!


Article 30: (Request 1)

38, 42C, 61X, 62X, 86A, 87, 87A, 87B


Article 31:

意外巴士近況


Robert (roberthk@netvigator.com) at Fri May 22 02:18, 1998 said:


意外巴士近況?


1. Citybus 202 - Accident in Shenzhen cut the root (11/96)


2. CMB LM9 - Unknown


3. CMB DL13 - Crash with 3BL in flyover near CHT in Causeway Bay in 1996





Moreover, where can buy the bus label (巴士車內告示) like


'TO STOP THE BUS RING BELL ONCE', etc. I don't want tear it from the bus.





Thank You!


Article 31: (Request 1)

202 should be up and running. Even I saw her running last


November running on the Kwun Tung away, QUICKLY passing the rt. 98D


3AD which I was taking.





y k


Article 32:

Re: 374, 399


小丸子VA51 Rt.106 小西灣 (k5959585@hkschool.net) at Fri May 22 10:36, 1998 said:


> eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:


> 想問下呢兩條線往年係幾時開呢?


>


> 今年會唔會六月一日開呢?





一定會開,而且會於5月30日端午節開CMB rt.374,399!











VA51 TONG HN8481


(LV97 CM7009)


Article 33:

Re: 赫見九廣413...


Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) at Fri May 22 13:40, 1998 said:


> Mike NG(LF126) (ngmike@hkstar.com) said:


> 方才飽食之後, 行返寫字樓之際, 見到上述巴士o係灣仔道近酒店o既


> 上行線出現, 車上冇客. 究竟咩原因佢會o係度出現呢? fO.o....


> 另外, 在下見佢車上有八仔機, 車頭大銀幕仲有一大堆豁免紙o添.


> 好奇想問o下大家, 呢部車平時走咩線多呢?





我頭先十二點見佢響九龍紅隧口準備過香港, 車頭有‘私家車’牌及冇攪數字牌.


Article 34:

城記司機好可惡!


小丸子VA51 RT.106 小西灣 (k5959585@hkschool.net) at Fri May 22 11:57, 1998 said:


係上年7月暑假,小弟和家人懷著喜興和高興的心情,在


小西灣巴士總站搭城記rt.118過紅磡轉KCRC去Lo Wu上


大陸,但我和家人一上架8XX的rt.118果車廂已經好悶


焗,架車d冷氣好小,架巴士像開暖氣般~~~熱~~~~熱死~~~


我和家人不理會她照樣上車搵果好位坐:


架rt.118龍初初好穩定地行走,我和大哥在車興鬆地看


漫畫書,但架118落柴灣道斜road時架巴士突然停在筲箕


灣官立中學停下來,我和我家人起初於為係停站上客,但


架118已停了15分鐘都未開車,後來有名乘客話壞車呀!


我和我家人說,有冇攪錯果司機知道壞車還不通知乘客,


所有乘客想下車之時,果司機乘5分鐘才給我們下車:


我爸說咁城記司機都有,知道壞車果司機應早通知乘


客,最衰就係,其實d城記司機已知道該巴士係已有問題,


但還俾人上車,實在不可不罵!


所以話,中記司機和城記好得多,起碼d中記司機知道自


己楂咁的巴士壞,便會立刻通知乘客的:








小西灣巴士鑒測組助理...


VA51 TONG HN8481


(LV97 CM7009)


Article 34: (Request 1)

o甘耐之前既野依家先講既? ^_^'





又唔使o甘話個司機、可能係新丁呢~!


架車突然壞左...... 佢隨時仲驚過你~!!


有邊間公司真係做到樣樣100分丫~ 算啦~





兩月個無post 文既...


William Fung


Article 35:

63M/63X 宣傳單張將收回


Stanley Yung (n281@hkstar.com) at Fri May 22 13:17, 1998 said:


有消息稱,由於 63M/63X 開辦之前需再更改


日前放在各站的宣傳單張將收回


Article 36:

今日90C...


T.P.T. (96029036d@hkpucc.polyu.edu.hk) at Fri May 22 13:16, 1998 said:


今日去西營盤返學~ 諗住搭90C烏蠅啦~ 點知...





今朝去到鴨利洲廠時, 見廠內一架烏蠅都無... 已心知不妙,


響廠所見: #1003跳N118, #1010跳E22, #2500跳8X...





7:05一架#974從廠駛出, 個攪牌係90C?? 唉~~ 無烏蠅, 不過


要返學, 無計啦~ 搭係啦~





上o左車之後等到7:10, 開車! 點知一出站, 就即刻撞埋個老


翁度... 個司機即刻停車, 攪o左無耐, 就叫所有乘客落車...


叫我地自己搭第二條線.. 咁即係乜野意思? 又唔賠返$5.3比我..


咁又蝕o左$5.3... 唉~~ 仲有時間剩.. 睇下戲先啦~





架90C攪到大街大塞車, 7:25 , 有救護車到... 鴨廠內o的車


住部塞住晒! 出唔到廠~


我睇到7:30就上新村搭91(LV81)走啦~





.....


T.P.T.


Article 37:

九巴大欖轉車站的自我宣傳廣告


TONY(S3M61) (wclui@vtech.net) at Fri May 22 12:03, 1998 said:


今日我又在上水見到一部有九巴大欖隧道廣告的巴士,行276P線


(編號是3AD142)


廣告較960號路線和三號幹線廣告簡單,而且有句口號,是:





大欖隧道線 64M 68M 68X 69M 直線轉車任你選


69X,269B,269,968











這會否意味九巴會派這些廣告的巴士行走大欖隧道巴士線?


Article 38:

巴士迷: 努力呀!


PTC (bc_cly@stu.ust.hk) at Fri May 22 09:32, 1998 said:


請問各位識唔識呢位巴士迷:








巴士迷: 努力呀!我o地支持你!





連續三日考四科o既PTC


Article 39:

CMB 78 and 79


100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) at Fri May 22 01:13, 1998 said:


I just wonder has anyone seen A/C buses on CMB's route 78 and 79 since CMB promised 'available' A/C service since May 1?





Where would CMB find additional A/C buses to serve these routes? Jumping plane from the one and only A/C bus on 43X?





Or this is just another case like 94X where A/C fare is available just 'in case' an A/C bus is allocated on the route?





100 Wong


Article 40:

Route T1


100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) at Fri May 22 01:05, 1998 said:


I have some questions regarding route T1.





Is this a franchised route? I assume not! Since only passengers with specific tickets are allowed on the bus, rather than just 'anyone' of the general public.





If so, I assumed Long Win and Citybus were contract hired by Airport Authority to run this route. Should they require PSL to serve on this route? Or franchised buses are automatically granted with PSL?





However, a bus driver with 17 License can't operate a non-franchised bus, which is under the 10 license.





So, what's going on here?





100 Wong





PS. Yes, I saw CTB used franchised bus on 629 once in a while, though CTB was probably just being 'sneaky' and most people can't tell (and I wonder if TD officials care) anyway!


Article 41:

又一城巴士總站


417 (96006257@plink.cityu.edu.hk) at Fri May 22 00:27, 1998 said:


早前有板友問及又一城巴士總站o既近況,小弟o係度同大家簡述一


o下。





又一城巴士總站已經成形(成形 =/= 完成),內部裝修好多都未做


好,行過時只見種o左專線小巴牌(大概係為綠小 2 號同 41M),而


總站向火車站o既一邊竟然有窗!(咁個站咪...... fO.o)





站內照明未完成,只見有四條坑度(度= 大約),其中兩條好似係孖


坑,即係一共六條坑(如果冇睇錯)。





咁即係話,除o左必然遷入o既 2C 同 203,以及將會以佢為總站o既


901 外,仲有兩、三條坑淨。





不過,對於o係九龍塘沙福道o既巴士應唔應該遷入,小弟o係初o黎報


到時已經貼文分析過,可惜冇留底。





大意:除 62R 外,其它各線似乎都係留o係原位好,因為部份路線可


以經浸會出口乘搭,分擔o左搭火車方向出口o既人潮,而城大師生員


工唔少,如果再將 M 線搬到又一城,既o徙油渣,又o徒時間,分分


鐘要加價,又要同人迫,唔搬好過搬。





希望大家滿意呢個報告。





417


Article 42:

[網站更新]IBX中巴工潮第二章


Colin Chang (kalim@netvigator.com) at Thu May 21 23:19, 1998 said:


港島巴士網站繼續連載八九中巴工潮資料的第二部分,歡迎各位前往一看。





另外,港巴網的「八達網聯」亦已重新投入服務。各位巴士網站站長(特別是近期成立的新網站)


請留意一下有否錯漏。





「港島新話題」內亦登載了由新巴舉辦之中巴員工轉職大會的內容撮要。


Article 42:

68M 改行大欖隧道後點行?


北區首相 (ericnet@hkstar.com) at Thu May 21 22:51, 1998 said:


請問68M改行大欖隧道後點行? 點樣上落葵盛圍?





又, 有冇人知道各大欖隧道線的行車時間表和班次?


(因為我需要用這些資料製作特輯)





多謝!





北區首相


Article 44:

冇T1o既禮拜日, 城蠅飛去邊?


wp12a (gw7112li@netvigator.com) at Thu May 21 22:24, 1998 said:


o黎緊個禮拜日(24/5)係立法會投票日, 機場唔攪旅行團, 為o左唔想


D市民掛住行機場就唔記得去投票.





咁呢日冇T1行, 917又唔開, D城市烏蠅會行邊? 泊廠? 定係走D未


行過o既線? 抑或走番晒落1同5C? 拭目以待...





黃埔十二甲 字


Article 45:

Please Help by...


Kaipan (markkp@school.net.hk) at Thu May 21 22:12, 1998 said:


To all HKBDB Boardmates,





Some F1 students are doing a survey on public bus service.


They post their questionnaire on HK Bus Newsgroup.


Please spare a minute to fill in the form on the NG.


They are doing a project. Thank you!





Kaipan Mark, Boardmaster of Hong Kong Bus Newsgroup.







Article 46:

有誰被抽中於5/23巴鼠迷世界的參觀柴廠活動


Jacky,AL65 (williamc@tsl.net.hk) at Thu May 21 22:03, 1998 said:





今日收到信通知我可以參加巴士迷世界於5/23


參觀柴廠活動.想問有無板友也幸運地抽中呢?


到時見.





首次也見最後一次入中巴車廠


Jacky,AL65.


Article 47:

馬鞍山又撞巴士


東邪 (GK9112) (mingyin@hkstar.com) at Thu May 21 20:34, 1998 said:


- 繼前日馬鞍山撞巴士(DT 8162),依家(20:30)小弟樓下又撞巴


士,同上次一樣,又係耀安村o既燈位,一部43X (3N??) 被一部私


家車撞尾,導致耀安村o的車出唔到,塞住左,站長已經到場處理,


相信傷毀都好輕微.





東邪


GK9112


Article 48:

有冇板友去6月6日的巴鼠埋世會的參觀中記柴廠?


小丸子VA51 RT.106 小西灣 (k5959585@hkschool.net) at Thu May 21 20:01, 1998 said:


計5月23日,6月6日的巴鼠埋世界的最後參觀中記柴廠


有冇板友去呢?


After23/5,in 6/6 the bus fans world will be last


to visit Chai Wan CMB depot,I want to know the days


are HKBDB member will go?








現在探討和計劃引進雙層低地台巴士


Dennis Trident A/C的


家裏巴士第一服務公司主席:


VA51 TONG HN8481


(LV97 CM7009)


Article 49:

Information about 1404 消息


Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Thu May 21 18:16, 1998 said:


According to a Citybus staff, 1404 has got some problem in its engine compartment. However, no crack has been discovered in its chassis so far.


(Follow-ups of this piece of information will be welcomed.)





據一位城巴職員透露,1404的引擎艙出現了一些問題(俗稱‘大盤裂’)。但暫時未有


人發現該車的底盤有裂痕。


(歡迎各板友對此事進行跟進。)


Article 50:

Route雜誌加63M,63X,E33路線資料


Dennis Lau (ss78k@netteens.net) at Thu May 21 17:38, 1998 said:


Route雜誌的路線改動通告已加63M,63X,E33路線資料,歡迎


進入參觀。








Dennis Lau


Article 51:

行車時間越來越慢!


B-2631 (dickson2@macau.ctm.net) at Fri May 22 15:18, 1998 said:


澳門近日有不少的修路工程, 其中在新口岸新八佰伴一帶最為嚴重,


使到了不少的道路都塞重塞車! 其中AP1 影響最大, 因為 AP1 是兩


巴雙間行車, 與香港的隧道線有所不同, 所以形成新褔記行澳巴時間


, 澳巴行新褔記時間! 塞車令原本的行車時間四十分鐘變成六十分鐘


而且今天到這修路的路段是沒有人開工. 但是巴士由昨天起, 港澳碼


頭往新八佰伴方向的巴士經行車天橋, 在松山隧道口迴旋處折返新八


佰伴! 即是在港澳碼頭行多兩個圈.





今天首航澳門至南京的 B-2631


Article 52:

Re: If you can decide 如果讓你揀 ......


S3BL (tin@school.net.hk) at Fri May 22 19:50, 1998 said:


> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:


> If you are allowed to make the following decision, where would you suggest that a bus museum can be built in Hong Kong? Why?


> 如果你可以選擇的話,你認為香港有什麼地方是最適合用來興建巴士博物館的呢﹖為


> 什麼﹖





你早D 出聲嘛..


以沙田區來說,大圍舊車廠最適合不過,原因是那裏本來是車廠,


地方夠大去擺真巴士展覽,而且臨區局計劃於該處建立博物館,


不過而家起緊文物博物館...


所以,你早D 出聲,咪可以建議臨區局起囉..(雖然未必得)





S3BL15


Article 52: (Request 1)

I think the new park at Ma Wan is good.


1, Enough new land;


2, Good scenery under the background of Tsing Ma bridge.





CityMan 2500


Article 52: (Request 2)

I will choice:


1. Tai Po, just next to Railway Musceum.


Reason: Upgrade the musceum to Hong Kong Transport Musceum.


2. The land between Kowloon Station and Jordon Road Ferry Bus Terminal,


but also, not only buses, but all transportation.


3. Ma Wan, again, not only for buses, but ...


Article 52: (Request 3)

1 啟德填海區


2 灣仔填海區


3 九記青衣廠


Article 53:

The news of Tai Lam Tunnel's Route(1)


Dennis Lau (ss78k@netteens.net) at Fri May 22 20:03, 1998 said:


Here is the information of Tai Lam Tunnel's Route





63M Un Long(East)---Tsuen Wan Ferry(Old)


From Un Long:0530---2310


Form Tsuen Wan:0620---0030


Frequency:8---15(Weekday),10---15(Holiday)


Fare:7.30/10.20


Fu Tei to Tsuen Wan:6.00/8.10


Tsuen Wan(TSuen Tak Garden) to Tsuen Wan:3.50/4.20


Tsuen Wan(Chung On St.) to Un Long:6.70/8.70


Tuen Mun to Un Long:4.30/5.00


Fu Tei to Un Long:3.20/4.20


Journey Distance:38km Journey Time:76m.





63X Tin Tsz---Jordon Road Ferry


Form Tin Tsz:0530---2300


Form Jordon:0610---0000


Frequency:10---20(Weekday) 14---20(Holiday)


Fare:10.00/14.50


Fu Tei to Jordon:9.00/12.80


Mei Foo to Jordon:3.50/5.00


Nathan Road to Jordon:3.50/4.20


Tuen Mun to Tin Tsz:4.30/5.00


Fu Tei to Tin Tsz:3.20/4.20


Journey Distance:44.7km Journey Time:105m





64M Tin Yiu---Tsuen Wan MTR


Form Tin Yiu:0540---2344


Form Tsuen Wan:0616---0020


Frequency:12---20


Fare:8.40


Tsuen Wan(Tsuen Tak Garden) to Tsuen Wan:3.30


After Au Tau Interchange to Tin Yiu:3.50


Journey Distance:25km Journey Time:32m





68M Long Ping---Kwai Shing Circuit


Form Long Ping:0530---0000


Form Kwai Shing:0620---0050


Frequency:5---10(Weekday) 6---10(Holiday)


Fare:8.40


Tsuen Wan(Tsuen Tak Garden) to Kwai Shing:4.20


After Au Tau Interchange to Long Ping:3.50


Journey Distance:28km Journey Time:50m





68X Un Long(East)---Jordon Road Ferry


From Un Long:0530---0025


Form Jordon:0610---0100


Frequency:5---15(Weekday) 6---15(Holiday)


Fare:12.50


Mei Foo to Jordon:5.00


Nathan Road to Jordon:4.20


Tai Lam Tunnel Interchange to Un Long:8.40


After Au Tau Interchange to Un Long:3.50


Journey Distance:35km Journey Time:65m





69M Tin Shui---Kwai Fong MTR


Form Tin Shui:0530---2354


From Kwai Fong:0616---0040


Frequency:6---12(Weekday) 7---12(Holiday)


Special Bus:


Form Tin Tsz:0740,0755(Weekday)


From Tin Yiu:0730(Weekday)


Fare:9.10


Tsuen Wan(TSuen Tak Garden) to Kwai Fong:4.20


Tsuen Wan(Chung On Road) to Tin Shui:8.40


After Au Tau Interchange to Tin Shui:3.50


Journey Distance:29km Journey Time:46m





I will continute that tomorrow!





Dennis Lau


Article 54:

Re: 沙田廠務簡報[22-05-98]


S3BL (tin@school.net.hk) at Fri May 22 19:30, 1998 said:


> 沙電學徒 (ranger@hknet.com) said:


> S3BL69 DL 3689


DL 3689唔係整番好咩?


我前日已見佢出街喎..





> 3BL93 DH 6750


> 因撞車等候修理


架車都整左好耐..


暫由S3N341替





> N280 CP 9645


> 因交通意外,車頭玻璃成個撞咧,現正放在3樓等候修理.


沙廠仲有隻亞記鴨,車頭車頂部份損毀,有冇板友知邊架?





S3BL15


Article 55:

Re: 九記專營權


Walter Kwong (walter@school.net.hk) at Fri May 22 17:01, 1998 said:


> 本人初來步到,有甚麼得罪請見諒.


>


> 問題:請問你們覺得應否取消九巴專營權,應否分數份公開競投.





專營權都冇左好耐啦,現在任何公司都可以開九龍新界線!


但我反對將現有路線公開競投,因為


1 九巴服務水平雖有問題,但我覺得絕對合格,甚至有七十分,這樣做對九巴不公!


係就連埋城巴新十三線及上次十四線一同競投


2 九巴網絡大,公開競投費時失時


3 反正都可以開新線,為何仲將舊線競投


4 有好多線冇人做,例74K,87


5 中巴路線公開競投是因為中巴服務已冇得救(政府觀點),而九巴就算差都仲有得改!


Article 55: (Request 1)

> 良景站長 (c5033432@hkbu.edu.hk) said:


> 請問你們覺得應否取消九巴專營權,應否分數份公開競投.





開放專營權是社會趨勢


專營權開放後,服務應有明顯進步


本人建議開放屯門/天水圍/北區/將軍澳





stanley yung


Article 56:

Re: [廣告] E31 on the Net 更新


CTB73R (bonopun@netteens.net) at Fri May 22 18:34, 1998 said:


> Flying Chuk (chuk@netvigator.com) said:


> 車輛特寫加入了中巴吉甫車,城巴Hino拖車及


> 城巴Volvo Olympian 11M.


> 歡迎參觀


> http://www.hkid.com/people/chuk


>


> 飛機竺


個LINK有問題.入吾到


Article 56: (Request 1)

我都唔知何解,打極都有'BR'...





飛機竺


Article 57:

【翻譯文章】新巴訂單


Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) at Fri May 22 18:02, 1998 said:


原文:


First Hong Kong Orders, Buses, Vol. 50, No. 519, June 1998, P.9.





http://www.hkid.com/hkibbs/transport/busa07.htm





--


車匙!


Article 58:

Re: 巴士世界己鐵定於27-5般家


Pirro Cheung (y931204@netvigator.com) at Fri May 22 19:26, 1998 said:


> VA 28(LF 106) (wong98@netvigator.com) said:


> 今日行過巴士世界,老闆話巴士世界己鐵定於27/5般往新址,請各住留意.


Where is the新址





(574)被放逐到969的


Pirro Cheung


AV134---GX7696


574---HD9422


510---GW1534


Article 59:

Re: 聽日馬場...


Wayne (n170@netvigator.com) at Fri May 22 19:24, 1998 said:


> T.P.T. (96029036d@hkpucc.polyu.edu.hk) said:


> 請問聽日幾點開始有802,811呢? 直至幾點?


>


> .....


> T.P.T.





大約 1600-1750


Article 60:

我被抽中6/6的參觀中記廠+問題?


小丸子VA51 RT.106 小西灣 (k5959585@hkschool.net) at Fri May 22 19:51, 1998 said:


今天下午,小弟收到巴鼠埋世界會寄我的通知我6/6去


參觀中記柴廠,我心情當然I am happy to good:


他當日叫我帶會員證和張巴鼠埋世會寄給我張通告:


但我張會員證已在31/3到了期好久,不知我帶那張到期


的會員證怕不怕呢?


On the PM today,I've just received the bus fan world


a letter,to notify me of on the 6 th June 1998 go to


visit the Chai Wan CMB depot.My mood is very excited


but my member credentials already in the 31/3 to expired.


I don't know the days visit a depot me to bring the expired


a member credentials of is practicable?














VA51 TONG HN8481


(LV97 CM7009)


Article 61:

頭先又去鴨廠..


T.P.T. (96029036d@hkpucc.polyu.edu.hk) at Fri May 22 19:26, 1998 said:


今日話說朝早炒#974後, 就返o左學, 十點三放學... 等車返


屋企, 等o左好耐, 兩架7,23,91,94, 同一架90B後終於來架


#214... (等咁耐仲要o黎2xx?! 真係失望..) 返到黃竹坑後面


的#908已追到..





之後就約個巴士迷o黎我屋企睇相, 13:45出香港仔食野...


食完就搭DA1(595)上海怡, 咁o岩見架LA14, 正當諗緊佢會轉


左入海怡定直行出中環之際, 發現兩樣都錯! 係出香港仔至


o岩! 原來今日行595, 咁就影o左張, 等佢出香港仔返海怡..





影夠就落o左去鴨廠, 今日鴨廠勁多新車:


#995 \


#996  > [未出牌]上o左牌布


#998 /


#999 → [未出牌]


#1001 → [未出牌, 跳字牌]


#1002 → [未出牌, 跳字牌]5


#1004 → [未出牌, 跳字牌]N118


#1007 → [未出牌, 跳字牌]E21


#1009 → [未出牌, 跳字牌]969


#1010 → [未出牌, 跳字牌]E22


#1013 → [未出牌, 跳字牌]E21


#1014 → [未出牌, 跳字牌]E21


#1404 → 因裂底盤而繼續在廠修理


#1506 → [未出牌, 單層MAN]


#2128 → [未出牌, Trident]5B


#2500 → 開o左引擎蓋, 跳8X, 已泊在鴨廠多日





影夠就行上利東搭94X, o岩o岩比我見到


2126 [未出牌, 跳「沙田火車站 170」, 比我影到正!]


2124 [未出牌, 連遮CityFlyer個黑膠貼都未meet..]


跟住就搭LF285(94X)出中環, 架車chok到丫.. 四個字到中環





港澳碼頭有架LF289攪o左「蘇屋 970」, 笑到我碌晒地下!


跟住o黎VA55, 又見到自己喎~~ AV135 -- 鄧浦鈍~~





之後去o左西講城睇車, 有張城記機場快線Cityflyer Poster,


Poster上有架2118, 賣$50, 要預訂~~


又見到架Cityflyer行5C... 咁我影完就走啦~ 搭架91號既寶,


好舒適, 訓著o左! 去到薄扶林見對面線有架Cityflyer行緊,


係試車, 好似係2120... 跟住就返屋企啦~





.....


T.P.T.


Article 62:

(廣告) 巴士狂熱陸續加入大欖隧道線資料


eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) at Fri May 22 19:20, 1998 said:


配合大欖隧道於下周一 (25/5) 通車, 九巴及城巴將於下周二


(26/5) 將其元朗及天水圍路線進行重組.





巴士狂熱現陸續加入路線重路後新資料.


已加入路線有:





64M


68X


69M


69P


69X


968





其他路線新資料稍後推出, 敬請留意.





若有錯漏, 歡迎指教.


Article 63:

1404


DA74(780) (c3035083@hkstar.com) at Fri May 22 18:23, 1998 said:


Why 1404 is out of order?


Article 64:

[廣告] File 37 更新


Terry Pan (koala@cuhk.edu.hk) at Fri May 22 17:29, 1998 said:


File 37 更新如下:





1. My Home Town 加入兩張新照;


2. Bus Bus Bus 加入九巴後勤車輛, 龍躉及城市烏蠅相共六張.





File 37





koala :)


Article 65:

論文:大欖隧道通車和新界西北巴士路線變化


TONY(S3M61) (wclui@vtech.net) at Fri May 22 19:30, 1998 said:


三號幹線最後一段─郊野公園段於五月二十五日通車,標誌著


整條三號幹線工程亦大致完成。


這條三號幹線由元朗凹頭為起點,經大欖隧道、汀九橋、葵青


隧道、西九龍快速公路、西區海底隧道至港島西營盤止,全長三十


多公里,是新機場核心計劃的一部份。三號幹線通車後由元朗至中


環三十分鐘,至荃灣十三分鐘,不僅可以令元朗、天水圍一帶提供


一條快捷和方便的通道直達市區,對舒緩屯門公路、甚至吐露港公


路的交通擠塞起著一個重要的作用。此外對北區﹝上水和粉嶺﹞的


交通亦間接起到作用,因為由北區往九龍西、荃灣、葵青和赤立角


新機場,較行吐露港公路和城門隧道更快捷。


九巴亦於通車後翌日﹝五月二十六日﹞把行經屯門公路的七條


巴士線改行三號幹線,並全數改用空調巴士行走。這七條巴士線包


括:64M(天耀─荃灣地鐵站)、68M(朗屏─葵盛圍)、68X(元朗東─


佐敦道碼頭)、69M(天瑞─葵芳地鐵站)、69X(天水圍市中心─佐敦


道碼頭)、269C(天水圍市中心─觀塘碼頭)、968(元朗西─銅鑼灣)


和969(天水圍─銅鑼灣)等,另外亦加開由天水圍往紅磡的269B線





九巴為彌補把上述路線改行三號幹線後對洪水橋的對外交通問


題,特別加開了兩條經洪水橋的巴士線,包括63M(元朗東─青衣地


鐵站)及63X(天慈─佐敦道碼頭);另外,68、68A和268B亦會於當日


起取消。


此外九巴亦於大欖隧道設轉車站,往元朗和天水圍方向無須繳


付車資,而往九龍方向則需補付車資;乘客若要轉車,就要向司機


索取轉車票,當轉乘另一條路線,便需把車資連同轉車票一同繳上


。這種方法和輕鐵接駁巴士轉輕鐵的方法也差不多。


我認為九巴這樣做對乘客有好處:改行三號幹線後,較原本經


屯門公路的行程快十分鐘至兩成,同時全數改用空調巴士,可以改


善服務,使乘客更快抵達終點站。不過我亦對此亦有不滿:第一,


九巴把原本的64M,68,68A,68M,68X改行三號幹線,對洪水橋和


藍地一帶居民不公平,因為只餘下53和新增的63M和63X,而且這三


條路線均較遲開出頭班車和提早收車,對一些早出晚歸的居民十分


不便;其次我原本估計當三號幹線建成後,北區會有新巴士線經三


號幹線至市區,可以改善北區對外交通,但奈何九巴又沒有計劃開


新線由北區經大欖隧道至市區,令到北區居民甚至筆者本人十分失


望。


另一方面,由於巴士路線改行三號幹線,導致屯門幾乎沒有巴士


往天水圍,雖然63X是經屯門往天水圍,但是並不足夠的,想乘巴士


往天水圍,唯有轉乘輕鐵或K2X巴士。


所以筆者希望九巴可以早日加開新線由上水和粉嶺,經大欖隧


道出市區,以及改善63M和63X班次,這樣便可以改善北區甚至洪水


橋和藍地一帶的對外交通;此外亦期望278P改全日後,會否改經三


號幹線往荃灣。另外九巴亦可把行經大欖隧道的路線裝設八達通機


,免卻帶備輔幣之餘,同時亦方便過用轉車票。


Article 66:

CityFlyer 在917的時間


Flying Chuk (chuk@netvigator.com) at Fri May 22 16:00, 1998 said:


我想問917Cityflyer開出時間(由深水'士步'開出,


最好由12:00PM-2:00PM那時段.多謝:)





飛機竺


Article 67:

[廣告]--一周大相


B-2631 (dickson2@macau.ctm.net) at Fri May 22 15:45, 1998 said:


今期一周大相的相片是以珠海公共巴士.


因為近期珠海購入不少的新巴士, 其中包括褔萊和珠江牌等.





B-2631


Article 68:

[通知] 觀塘瑪利諾書院巴士之友會


Volvo (S3BL1) (volvo@school.net.hk) at Fri May 22 15:19, 1998 said:


觀塘瑪利諾書院巴士之友會宣佈:


本會於六月廿七日舉辦的參觀中巴柴灣車廠活動,


已於二十日截止報名, 請勿再 e-mail 來報名.


現在已有廿多人報名, 所以現在要從中抽出十五名.


獲准參加的板友最遲會o係六月十日前收到本會幹事


的電話, 而o係十號前仍未收到電話, 即表示落選.


如有任何查詢, 請e-mail 至 Volvo (S3BL1).


Article 69:

Article: Court defends deal on buses


Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Fri May 22 20:23, 1998 said:


The following article is extracted from today's West Australian (22.5.98) :





COURT DEFENDS DEAL ON BUSES (By Roger Martin)





Premier Richard Court lashed out yesterday in defence of the Government's controversial purchase of diesel buses, claiming Opposition transport spokeswoman Alannah MacTiernan was doing the bidding of failed tenderers for the bus contract.





Mr Court told the Legislative Assembly Ms MacTiernan's constant questioning of the deal had nothing to do with debate on which fuel should be used, but was intended to get the tender reopened.





But Ms MacTiernan dismissed Mr Court's claim as ludicrous, labelling it as 'the last refuge of scoundrels'.





' He is obviously highly embarrassed by the complete implausibility of his arguments and the fact that he can't justify the claims he was making,' Ms MacTiernan said.





The State Government has been under intense pressure since last month when it gave a contract to Mercedes to replace its bus fleet. Of the first 133 buses to be delivered, 128 will be diesel powered.





Mr Court said on Tuesday that the Government would have preferred to have its entire bus fleet powered by gas, but manufacturers of gas buses could not provide guarantees of reliability.





On Wednesday, Ms MacTiernan produced a letter from failed bidder Renault saying no such guarantee was requested by the State Government.





Mr Court said the contract with Mercedes allowed the Government to choose whatever power source it wanted in future bus purchases.


Article 70:

Defn of 'Delicenced' 除牌與停牌


Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Fri May 22 20:29, 1998 said:


How would you define this term?


究竟‘除牌’與‘停牌’的意義,有何分別呢﹖


Article 71:

唔搭 243R,點去青嶼幹線遊客中心?


Anthony Yuen (ayky@netvigator.com) at Fri May 22 21:37, 1998 said:


請問現時除 243R 外,有冇其他公共車輛去到呢?(如汀九橋既車


會唔會整個站係中心下面?)





而遊客中心又可唔可以係長亨或坦杆山路行去呢?


Article 72:

[廣告]--的神吐相集


B-2631 (dickson2@macau.ctm.net) at Fri May 22 21:42, 1998 said:


的神吐相集已經正式啟用, 但是仍有不少相片未加入, 所以現時的相


片十分有限. 另外已經新加了 Benz O814D 相集!





B-2631


Article 73:

發生什麼事>?!


B-2631 (dickson2@macau.ctm.net) at Fri May 22 21:49, 1998 said:


又發生了什麼事! 在我之前 Post 的文無晒! 又爆 Server?!





B-2631


Article 74:

好咯!


eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) at Fri May 22 21:49, 1998 said:


好咯, 平時叫你地貼文記住 cut 文, 唔好貼灌水野, 唔好一文幾貼,


講多兩句又話離題又話惡, 而家又爆 server 咯, 大家安樂晒!


Article 75:

冷靜!


Anthony Yuen (ayky@netvigator.com) at Fri May 22 21:58, 1998 said:


我稔係版主救版前,都係少講冇為野喇... 等佢整好先算啦!


Article 76:

有一次小弟去見工.....


小丸子VA51 RT.106 小西灣 (k5959585@hkschool.net) at Fri May 22 22:10, 1998 said:


有一次,小弟去香港XXX會見份xxx助理工作,果見我的


負人問我,你返呢度係米將會搭巴士?我話係!


那負責人說坐巴士:咁負責人都有,問人返工搭what車,


肯定,那個見我的負責人咁係知我係巴士迷,所以才咁問!


我想那見我的負責人用歧視眼光看我們d巴士迷定!








VA51 TONG HN8481


(LV97 CM7009)


Article 77:

影相可否入廠


3AV171 (yhtsn@speednet.net) at Fri May 22 22:50, 1998 said:


請問以下地方可否走入/只可在門口影相





鴨廠 (若不可淮入,是否可在鴨利周穿影入去)


海洋公園巴士站





柴灣廠


柴灣常安街





上水廠膀邊無用到的巴士站(以前的上水巴士站)


Tuen Mun 80-82 Depot





3AV171


Article 78:

今日牛河及E33灌水事件


AL118(FF1819) (rainbowg@netvigator.com) at Fri May 22 22:50, 1998 said:


今朝早一早坐110龍去佐碼, 之後坐68X(S3BL286/DY9362)去元朗, 行經最後的屯公, 跟住坐輕鐵去屯門市中心, 坐61Xo的S3N去九碼, 之後坐11B(AL52/EY4088, 我第一次坐11B坐呢架車)返學校!





我o向屯市一塊龍記站牌都見唔到, 請問何人灌水?


Article 79:

將軍澳D巴士一亂+AS5復出之日


3AV171 (yhtsn@speednet.net) at Fri May 22 22:48, 1998 said:


首先想問問AS5在邊日復出,前排有版友說AS5首日行111,但不知


是何日,我5月4日早上見AS5行98A時都好新下,會不會在附近的


日子。





5月會考日日在家才覺將軍澳常出現怪車,訓練車3M,M,3BL,N,G,


3N常出現不談





4/5 1.首度見AS5,突晒眼!


2.AF載十個客左右從將軍澳廠個邊開了入將軍澳隧道,後不


知去了邊到


3.VA64早上8:30am現金鐘,車頭掛111,左尾牌箱掛691,不


知部車是邊線,可能問車上的客會知掛!


5/5 1.一3AV掛27與私家車牌從景林開往坑口方向


6/5 1.一3AV(好似是3AV195)有三SP?R?T廣告掛白牌從景林開


往坑口方向


9/5 1.最後一日見AS5行98A,可能之後便掉了去2A了。


2.我終於知將軍澳廠的唯一一部單層車AF原來是AF2,個日


AF2下午放在將軍澳廠


11/5 1.一3BL掛26牌有漢保廣告從景林開往坑口方向


14/5 1.一AN(FP4???)->AN5/8掛203E牌2:40pm從景林開到頌明


苑對開的迴旋柱倒頭走左。


21/5 1.3M1近三點在觀碼出現


2.296A不用3AD用AL(FF2295)(續下天)


3.98D部DH6293去了23,下午三點遇同線的3AV84,3AV84


掛住98D牌,不知做什麼出現觀碼。(續下天)


4.4:45pm在欣明苑對開十字路口出現一3AV(HG2630)掛89C


K廠車從景林個邊開過來,(開頭以為是98C)不是將軍澳廠


過來,又不似去將軍澳廠,又繼AN後不知做什麼的九記。


5.GA6126行98A近2:30pm蹲低無人理


22/5 1.今早見3AV84行返98D,想它必依舊服務,怎料4:30pm它


又與昨一樣掛98D,私家車牌上山過康盛出觀塘,吾通又


去觀碼?


2.690部GP6970今日去了26


3.93M今又用S3BL,不過是用S3BL1下一部則是S3BL,見車


牌是DK7897,以為是S3BL2,以為1和2一起跟住行,回


家看看,原來是S3BL3,但1和3一起行都算難得。


4.296A今不用AL119,反而用AS(GW3014),不知是否296A


是否1st用AS呢!


5.98D部DK3530行93A,車尾掛布牌93A,這麼多年竟還有


布牌出現。





Dennis Yeung,3AV171


Article 80:

問澳門的O814的車牌


CTB73R (bonopun@netteens.net) at Fri May 22 22:40, 1998 said:


如題,THANK YOU.