Today's Articles: 61.
Articles' Numbers: (19980521_01-61)
Article 1:
E33與E31+大欖隧道廣告
Flying Chuk (chuk@netvigator.com) at Wed May 20 16:01, 1998 said:
E33與E31
上年5月22月E31啟航,今年5月
22日E33啟航,幾正.
個日有冇板友去坐E33呀?
*********************************
大欖隧道廣告
我今日放學後去荃灣模型勿語,坐到架
58M AD???(舊冷氣,Cum LTA10 EURO1偈)
係屯公有成85Km/h喎,結果我見到1架59M冷
龍有大欖隧道廣告,之後到荃灣買左架50號
Tomica同一架閃燈Tomica之後過萬色店買左
隻Leon新碟,之後在門口坐車回家,結果上左
架58M AL??,我又在屯公見到架968 AV有
大欖隧道廣告.仲有架訓練3N.其實個大欖隧
道廣告幾正.我想問下遲D呢D車係咪掛牌大
欖隧道線呀?
飛機竺
Article 2:
Re: 870?870?
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Wed May 20 18:36, 1998 said:
> DA82 (da82@netvigator.com) said:
> 頭先1730左右,我響金鐘道見到870行97番利東!!
> Ivor兄的資料的確準!!!
你肯定那部是870﹖可否提供你當時看到那部車的車牌和車隊編號等資料﹖以及目擊
當時的情況﹖
Article 2: (Request 1)
呢度答左.
我只係睇到車尾FLEET#,信不信由你喇!(但我真係睇到係870)
DA82,HB8095.
Article 2: (Request 2)
> wp12a (gw7112li@netvigator.com) said:
> 咁架車係咪百份之百復原?
梗係100%復原啦! ^_^
> 有冇翻油?
有
> 車牌有冇換過?
冇留意,我響橋上面見到個編號好似870,之後就不停咁睇個FLEET#,
當確實左係870 0既時候,佢已經行左去好遠!
> 如果唔係, 有乜o野唔同o左?
冇乜留意...
DA82,HB8095.
Article 2: (Request 3)
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:
>
> 好似﹖﹗請問當時那部車是正在行駛還是停了站呢﹖
> (單憑一個很似870的車隊編號，似乎不足以證實它就是870。除非有其他目擊證人可
> 以加以證實吧﹗)
得罪講句, 870 架車咁特別, DA82 佢會唔會突登貼篇文出黎呃其他板友先?
巴士迷o既觀察力好強o既, 離遠睇 fleet no. 同車牌容乜易丫....
仲有, 同 870 近似o既車有幾多架先? 咪得 810 一架囉. 會唔會 810 又咁o岩
得咁橋行 97 呢?
況且都話左艾偈放料話 870 出番黎咯, 都唔多駛懷疑啦!
Article 2: (Request 4)
Would somebody tell what is the special thing of 870 & 810
which those member mention in previous article? Thanks
Damon
Article 2: (Request 5)
> DA82 (da82@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 冇所謂啦,各位可以信,可以唔信!我冇話要迫人人都要信.
> 當時我仲留意到架車係上左生力'咩'啤酒T-BANNER廣告.
DA82兄可能睇錯o左。 o個架應該係810 o黎。
因為星期日我見到810 行唔知九十幾號(總之係鴨利洲o既香港仔隧道線)，
而架車又係上o左生力啤廣告。
Article 2: (Request 6)
> 安迪安 (h9703053@hkusua.hku.hk) said:
> DA82兄可能睇錯o左。 o個架應該係810 o黎。
> 因為星期日我見到810 行唔知九十幾號(總之係鴨利洲o既香港仔隧道線)，
> 而架車又係上o左生力啤廣告。
唔怪得九巴８１號的路線膠牌好多變o左８│啦.
Article 2: (Request 7)
或者可能真係我睇錯啦,但城巴成日跳飛機過喎......有冇人證實到810係咪行97呢?
忽然諗起個十字保險廣告:
食鬼CAR佬: 亞爺,唔跳飛機得唔得呀?
亞爺: 都係跳飛機好,善用資源嘛!
....
....
DA82,HB8095.
Article 2: (Request 8)
> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:
>
> 希望大家不要誤會我。我只是由於近日聽到太多有關870的傳聞，所以作出懷疑而已。
>
> (這邊箱有人說它除了牌，那邊箱又有人見到它在街上行走。你教我信誰才好﹖)
Yes! is 除了牌, but change another register number ma..
---
Aqua856
Article 2: (Request 9)
一定係巴鼠埋世界o既巴士之訊放流料!(成日都係)
Article 3:
巴士迷又被人歧視?
YLxSS 眼火爆的巴士迷 (trident@powernethk.com) at Wed May 20 18:21, 1998 said:
在YLxSS這間中學裏面，有一班巴士迷，但很可惜，
因為這班巴士迷在校內被人嚴重侮辱，更加令人火
滾的是，不但侮辱我們巴士迷，而且還悔辱了全個巴士
界。以下的是他們的對話：(他們對我們不客氣，我們也不用留情！)
(我相信各版友看到都眼火爆。)
陶智鵬(以下的會用陶字代表)：胡健文，你看看你隔離的xxx，他
又不知看Do羊。
胡(代表胡健文)：肯定[日弟]緊一D關於BUS的o野o拉！
陶：他(直指我)都不知幾白痴，他的喜好更加白痴。
胡：mic係！巴士都o吾知有o羊靚，我支筆mic仲靚！
…
我聽了真係眼火爆，這樣不但只，還拿果支勁「靚」o既
筆在我眼前扮o野。
YLxSS 眼火爆的巴士迷~~~
ATR1~~~HJ2127
S3N121~~~DP5782
上
(各版友看到後有何反應o里？)
Article 3: (Request 1)
In BLMSSS (Baptist Lui Ming Choi Secondary School, although
no one is Bus Fan(Just me ~*.*~), But other students and teacher feel
serprise! And I am a few special in F.1!
---
Aqua
Article 3: (Request 2)
> 沙電學徒 (ranger@hknet.com) said:
> 我都有以上的經歷,是我在中學時我O亞媽成日話咪巴士有咩好咋?成日
> 影巴士,遊巴士,又浪費金錢,且又用一O的好悔辱的話話我,正一白痴仔
> 一見巴士就發O左狂,又話我成日一放學就同呢O的人講電話,一講講好來
> 先收線,有一次重大鑊,我很晏先返家,這是巳F.4的事,是當時271剛剛
> 轉3AV 行,我放學候去坐一轉,回家時巳8點了,雖然我作大話,但比我O亞
> 媽矢O道,重好話放學一定要返家,星期六日吾准去街,由於當時我有一
> 部單車,我想去遊巴士,影巴士我會同亞媽作古仔話[去吐露港馬奇單車]
> 就在呢個時去遊河,但好在都冇人知道.
> 直至現在,雖然在巴士公司做,我亞媽都好似以前O甘話我去影巴士,遊巴士
> 好無聊,但冇以前話得O甘煩,雖然遊河吾駛用錢,但仍話我好白痴,你一日
> O系廠對住成堆巴士,你吾厭咩?白痴仔!!老母的話吾單止侮辱我,重侮辱埋
> 全港O的巴士界,真系豈有此理呀,下!!!!!!!!!!!!
That's in fact what my mum and relatives say.....too bad...
Just to add to that, they say my collection are garbage, dirty, useless, scrap metal.....
> 非常之曾英文的
> 沙電學徒
> 字
> 英文非常之乞人曾呀!!
This is perhaps the start of racial fight, discrimination....and every ugly face of human you can imagine.
Article 3: (Request 3)
> (各版友看到後有何反應o里？)
唔使理人地點諗, 咁樣就會開心D.
鐘意巴士同鐘意筆都係一種喜好 je..
Article 3: (Request 4)
唔駛同佢o地一般見識o丫!
咪盞影衰自己/盞自己血壓高!
為D咁o既人,值唔值呀?
你理得佢咁多,把口係佢o架嘛!
最多你咪認清佢o既真面目,以後唔好睬佢law!
(又講講道理)
一部mc模型同一棟銀紙,
你要邊樣?
你鍾意巴士,咪要巴士law!
你鐘意銀紙,咪要銀紙law!
耶穌都話寬恕別人七十個七次啦!
你咪原諒佢law!
佢變本加厲你咪唔好理佢law!
你怕人話咪唔好響school 睇巴士書law!
剛失戀的
LX253
Article 3: (Request 5)
呵呵呵!YLXSS是我母校哦!
還記起兩三年前,學校附近的私人樓未起時
站上學校的二三樓,望出去便能飽覽元朗公路
近水邊圍一段的風光,一小息和飯完午飯便會
同班FRIEND企向三樓
眺望出元朗公路,看城巴(901,902)直路落斜狂沖
記得在元朗公路初通車時
BL1,BL2,BL3都曾一同行69X,時間長達三個月
當見到有69X BL 行過時,我同班FRIEND都會估
佢係BL1,定係BL2,定係BL3的.
又記得個陣見過中記寶寶,勝利二型行元朗公路(旅行)
又記得當時預備'湯'的九記寶寶
去癈車場的路途中也行經學校下面的那條路.
成日見到.
Article 4:
中巴數問
Clement dM12 Bus (clement@netteens.net) at Wed May 20 17:37, 1998 said:
請問中巴有邊幾部車不是香港砌
而是英國原裝入口呢?
LF211是不是Re-body呢?
Article 4: (Request 1)
All DART.
Article 4: (Request 2)
> GU8933 (w0108@netvigator.com) said:
>
> AL1及2 ,BR1及2 , DL1及2 , LF1 , MB1-40 , MC1-12 ,
> ML1 , ML2 , SF1(RLX1) , TC1 , XF1-206
LF1同SF1係唔係英國砌o架？
仲有LF107，DC1-20，CX1-8，同埋一架亞記車身o既樣版LX，編號唔記得。
AM1、SM1、AV1-8、MS1-2同DD1好似都係，請各位證實。
Article 4: (Request 3)
印象中不是。(有錯請指正。)
該部是BR8074。原編號LX128，後來編號被改為LX201。
那麼CM1和CM2呢﹖
Article 4: (Request 4)
> G MAN LEEOO@IBM.NET (LEEOO@IBM.NET) said:
> 係英國LF 1 RE-BODY
英國re-body??
> LA6 好似都係，請各位證實。
唔係，無一架中巴雙層冷氣車係外地砌o既
Article 5:
5月26日
M12 (matt4127@netteens.net) at Wed May 20 20:16, 1998 said:
如題.
當日屯門,元朗,天水圍居民又要重新適應,因為64M,68M,69M,69X會改路,
64M,68M會改總站(荃灣地鐵及葵盛圍RESPECTIVELY),而且會全部轉用冷氣車,
68,68A取消.,真可惜,以後要去紅橋又少幾部車搭喇.
Article 5: (Request 1)
> M12 (matt4127@netteens.net) said:
> 如題.
> 64M,68M會改總站(荃灣地鐵及葵盛圍RESPECTIVELY),而且會全部轉用冷氣車,
64M係荃木用68M宜家條坑呀﹖
辛格
Article 5: (Request 2)
> eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:
>
> 又真係好陰公, 難為 D 返工返學客, 又要計過晒坐車時間, 行大欖隧道
> 一唔駛塞屯公上斜果度, 大把時間剩出黎, 都唔知點算.
有乜點算﹖﹗朝早仲可以訓耐D添﹗我諗博愛唔會塞車塞都佢地要
更早出門卦﹗
連我呢個屯門人都要重新編過個時間表﹐3號幹線0既汀九橋之通車﹐
小弟已經慳左5分鐘出荃灣﹒
5月26日~~最尾一日考試﹗
辛格
Article 5: (Request 3)
德褔5D (97089033d@polyu.edu.hk) said:
>
> 小弟亦有一小問題：
>
> 請問６３Ｍ在興芳路有沒有站？過了荃灣路之後，好像是經楊屋道的，
> 咁又有冇站在楊屋道呢？
聽聞係咁:
....屯門公路, 青山公路, 葵富路, 興芳路 (青衣方向), 荃灣路,
荃青交匯處, 德士古道, 楊屋道, 大河道, 沙咀道, 圓墩圍.
Article 6:
Re: 276, 276P, 277
德褔5D (97089033d@polyu.edu.hk) at Wed May 20 23:47, 1998 said:
> 北區首相 (ericnet@hkstar.com) said:
> 由於大欖隧道行將通車, 由元朗經新田公路往北區的車輛, 必須改
> 經博愛交匯處, 連接博愛交匯處至三號幹線坳頭交匯處的新路入新
> 田公路. 即由青山公路近坳頭不能上新田公路.
>
> 請問 276, 276P 及 277 會否因而改道? 會點樣改法?
>
> 北區首相
唔係 o番！因為運豬署話避免博愛交匯處擠塞，所以唔會開新田公路連接
博愛交匯處一段之三號幹線的天橋。即是話，由新田公路去元朗仍需要經
過凹頭迴旋處，行原有之青山公路入元朗。所以，２７６、２７６Ｐ、
２７７同７６Ｋ都唔會改路。
另外，據凹頭鍾伯講，佢話政府本來會拆凹頭迴旋處，改為交通燈，去遷
就興建西鐵，但現在會延遲去做。
在這裡提醒各位板友：
凹頭迴旋處 並不是 凹頭交匯處
凹頭迴旋處 是青山公路和錦田公路交界的一個迴旋處。
凹頭交匯處 是三號幹線、青山公路和新界環迴公路（新田公路段）的交
界處，這個交匯處是以天橋互相連接，那裡的天橋縱橫交錯
、眼花瞭亂，實際位置的地名是叫沙埔。
5D 德褔花園 往 紅磡 (循環線)
車費:$3.5 行車里數:18.1km 行車時間:60min
主力之一DC7456
Article 6: (Request 1)
但經大欖隧道的巴士線, 必需經由博愛交匯處入三號幹線, 經由坳頭
交匯處入大欖隧道. 而近博愛交匯處的路牌, 已指示由元朗往上水的
駕駛者必須由博愛交匯處左轉三號幹線, 再入新田公路北行, 因此,
276, 276P 及 277 必定改路, 但 76K 及 77K 則不受影響.
北區首相
Article 6: (Request 2)
我想問係唔係由坳頭迴旋處駛入青公(沙埔段)﹐上唔到環迴公路﹖
如果係﹐以上三條路線就必須改道﹒
Article 6: (Request 3)
閣下看到的路牌是頭頂的藍色路線指示牌，還是見黃色的臨時路牌呢？
你要知道，藍色路線指示牌上的目的地是將來固定的路線，而黃色路牌
則是臨時更改路線，指示駕駛者行正確的路。正如你在龍翔道或西九龍
快速公路上的藍色路牌看見飛機標誌，但現在飛機場在不在大嶼山呢？
另外，巴士如果改道的話，你應該會看見告示的，況且２７６、２７６Ｐ
同２７７過了新元朗中心之後還有兩個站，其中新港酒店個站仲要係小弟
經常搭巴士的地方，但到今天也不見改路通知。
唔怕話你聽，如果２７６、２７６Ｐ同２７７行博愛交匯處，肯定有排塞
，這個博愛交匯處，真係唔行好過行。唔知閣下以前有冇試過天天塞凹頭
迴旋處的滋味，這個情景，很快便會發生在博愛交匯處。
5D 德褔花園 往 紅磡 (循環線)
車費:$3.5 行車里數:18.1km 行車時間:60min
主力之一DC7456
Article 6: (Request 4)
是藍色的路線指示牌.
北區首相
Article 7:
rt.968永遠同【八達通】無緣份? 反對!
水魚 Waterfish (AV314) (jimes@netvigator.com) at Thu May 21 09:20, 1998 said:
> (1)轉車站問題.
有分段控制嗎
>
> (2)城巴獨營rt.969及停在轉車站有關.
用轉車票先可以用分段價俾錢
>
> (3)各路線的收費不同,如果rt.968安裝【八達通】司機唔知顯示什麼收費好?
唔明. 用轉車票俾錢係一樣, 無分係邊條線既票
>
> 我相信rt.968永遠同八達通無緣份
反對,而家968無裝機係因為元朗廠無收費處理機
及唔夠機裝,
(唔紀得以前行 968 D 3AV已經準備裝機?已經裝置架啦)
水魚 Waterfish
AV314 (968字軋)
Article 7: (Request 1)
我同幾個968掛牌師傅傾過,今年一,二月間已陸續有掛牌車回廠裝
八達通收費機,但係0向屯廠裝,另外師傅也要回廠接受八達通收費
機操作訓練.
唔通批3AV用0左來行960/961!?
Ronald
Article 7: (Request 2)
> Colin Chang (kalim@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 如果全部巴士線都用八達通，反而好可以取代轉車票，因為咭內可紀錄
> 乘車資料，轉車時掃多次即可。
起碼最快要等到99年中!
還有有些車沒有<<八達通>>或者壞o左的。
Article 7: (Request 3)
> VA-61【郡主】 (kyy690@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 起碼最快要等到99年中!
咁都唔係好耐遮.
> 還有有些車沒有<<八達通>>或者壞o左的。
九巴作風一向穩陣, 佢唔會貿貿然在唔夠八達通機情況下
某些車有八達通, 某些就無.
壞左? 車長間自然會識做.
rt.968永遠同【八達通】無緣份? 無可能.
Article 7: (Request 4)
唔會掛!
Article 8:
Re: [專題討論]颱風時的機場巴士服務
Wayne (n170@netvigator.com) at Thu May 21 01:39, 1998 said:
> Alex Chan (alexki@netvigator.com) said:
> 今日聽收音機,指今年南中國海一帶,會出現大約13個熱帶氣旋,而7月
> 新機場開始使用時,又正是風季.....
>
> 假設颱風真的襲港,目前的機場,及機場巴士是繼續服務和運作的,相
> 信新機場也在颱風襲港時也繼續運作.但由於機場已遠離市區,而機場
> 巴士也改為雙層客車,在颱風時雙層巴士在北大嶼山快速公路這種空
> 曠的公路行車,是會有一定危險的,而機場巴士又必須繼續運作....
>
> 今日所要討論的,只有一點:
>
> 巴士公司會如何面對這情況?
>
> 個人認為,巴士公司最好的方法,便是以單層巴士運作.但問題是:
> 1 巴士公司必須調動大量單層巴士以維持班次.
> (因為機場遠離市區,往返機場要依賴公共交通工具,在颱風時,因為的
> 士大都不會服務,故對往返機場的公共交通,需求更大)
>
> 2 巴士公司為保持機場線的服務水平,必須調動較舒適的巴士行走.
>
> 結果城巴會不會派出全部B10M應變,而龍運會不會向九巴借單層巴士
> 呢?還是,乾脆繼續以Trident行走呢?
>
> 請各板友就此話題發表意見.
>
> Alex Chan
其實, 最重要 青馬橋會否像 1997 MR.VICTOR or 澳門之兩條
大橋 & 連貫公路, 8 號時要全線封閉.
當,青馬橋要全線封閉時, 巴士公司派甚麼車都母用.
Article 8: (Request 1)
我就話只要在8號風球的情況下, 跟本就沒有任何變動的需要.
因為青馬橋都可以用下層行嘛! 而且, 一到9號風球的時候, 所有
巴士都停駛啦, 還有巴士服務?
口多講埋, 我估計機鐵在9號都會停駛(記不記得剛過去的9號風球
呀! 連所有架空地鐵都停.), 都時機場酒店咪笑到見牙唔見眼!
綠川光
Article 8: (Request 2)
上次9號風球時仲有A20，但係其他o既都停駛。
咁當然啦，去舊機場唔駛行海傍o既公路，但係行北大嶼肯定比較大風同
危險。8號風球時東廊已經唔行巴士，7xx全部改行英皇道。何況處於外
圍的北大嶼公路？
我估新機場比舊機場當風，打8號時可以已經危及航班升降，機場可能會
關閉，唔似舊機場咁。
再唔係用機鐵囉。機鐵行路軌，行車時點都比巴士穩定。
Article 8: (Request 3)
如果打九號風球, 飛機都未必升降啦, 況且出面危險,
旅客更應留在機場內, 仲搭巴士走黎走去咩.
--
在拉記的車匙!
Article 8: (Request 4)
你又不需要那麼擔心, 現在巴士服務大部份在8號風球下都是正常
的, 而且, 往東涌的巴士服務都不會在一掛8號風球就即停啦! 更
何況是機場巴嘛. 雖然用單層會定些, 不過在此情況下任何一部巴
士都有危險的, 用單層與雙層巴在此情況的分別便不會很大嘛!
不過, 在此情況下, 機鐵會比巴士安全喎! 如果連機鐵都停, 巴士
一定會跟的.
綠川光
Article 8: (Request 5)
不應該在8號風球時有巴士行青嶼幹線,因為該公road
又空曠又闊大,如果一架雙層巴士係北公以80/90公里
速度來行北公,而當時該公road吹烈風的話....我想一定
架巴士搖搖擺,更可能行到半road時被龐大烈風吹翻!!
VA51 TONG HN8481
Article 9:
好似沙廠有'長牛'
VA-61【郡主】 (kyy690@netvigator.com) at Wed May 20 23:20, 1998 said:
> 丁蟹 Simon Lee (rlee@netvigator.com) said:
> 今日我買本'便利'睇, 在50頁內看見一套在廣州拍攝中的
> 無線新劇–神探李奇的拍攝花絮, 在其中一段內講述該劇
> 需要一輛巴士作為拍攝, 因此監製在廣州找了架'長牛'來,
> 然後用紙鋪在該輛'長牛'上, 再噴上紅色及奶黃色腰線,
> 十足當年九巴的'烏咀狗'.
> 有興趣的板友可以買來看看.
好似,沙廠有'長牛'!
Article 9: (Request 1)
> GU8933 (w0108@netvigator.com) said:
>
> O係咪 D418(AD7324)???
沒可能﹗此車已經在年前被肢解了。
Article 9: (Request 2)
> GU8933 (w0108@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 咁會唔僧係 A19(AD4807)???
有可能。但聽聞此車是停泊在九龍灣廠的。
(據悉4961則是停泊在沙田廠的。)
Article 10:
Re: 青嶼幹線通車一周年
TONY(S3M61) (wclui@vtech.net) at Wed May 20 17:16, 1998 said:
> 賓尼 (96008318@plink.cityu.edu.hk) said:
> 再過兩天就是此路通車一周年紀念日,它把大嶼山和市區連在一起,以後不用
> 坐船入大嶼山了.
> 當日亦是E21,E31兩線開辦一周年日子.其後還有E22,N21,E32,E11,E42,E33
> 線的開辦.
> 當青嶼幹線通車初期,吸引大批市民前來遊覽.E21,E31班班巴士爆滿,當局只
> 好加開X11,X21,X31,X32四條觀光循環巴士線.九巴和城巴為應付乘客需求,
> 分別抽調L,K,U,S廠的各式各樣雙層空調巴士和非專利部的巴士來行走E21,
> X21,E31,X31,X32線,頓時使大嶼山區熱鬧起來.
> 另外,新款Dennis Trident低地台巴士,由去年12月起,便引入E11,E31,E32,
> E42.帶給乘客一種耳目一新的感覺.
> X11線曾在去年6月至11月創下兩個香港巴士史的紀錄:
> (1) 行車里數最長.
> (2) 收費最昂貴($34.00)
> 展望將來,隨著地鐵東涌線在6月22日的啟用,E11和E21應最受影響,因為此
> 兩線途經的地區均可用地鐵代替.但在7月6日赤立角機場啟用當日,A11,A12,
> A21,A22,A31,A41,E34,E41,N11,N22,N31線開辦,連同其他已開辦的路線.巴
> 士仍然是多數市民用來來往新機場,東涌及市區的公共交通工具.而東涌西部
> ,大蠔是未來的重點發展區,再加上連接愉景灣和北大嶼山公路的隧道將於明
> 年落成.我相信巴士所扮演的角色仍十分重要.
>
> 以下有兩條問題想問問大家:
> (1) 您第一次乘青嶼幹線巴士是在何時,是哪條線呢?
> 小弟是在去年7月12日乘E31往東涌.
筆者係在通車後四日(26/5/97)下午4時15分乘E31由青衣往東涌 的，當時搭E31時，有很多人乘搭，頭四架都飛站，到第五架 先可以上到車。
> (2) 您認為在新機場啟用後,哪一條線最有機會成為'線王'?
我諗係S64線，因為機鐵太貴，D人一定搭地鐵至東涌後
再轉S64去新機場(純綷個人意見)
>
> 歡迎各板友齊來討論,如有錯漏,多多指正.
>
> 賓尼.王
> My ICQ : 8147686
>
Article 10: (Request 1)
> (1) 您第一次乘青嶼幹線巴士是在何時,是哪條線呢?
我就5月25日，同班Friend去完Camp後去東涌坐E21返家。
好多人，5XX富豪好舒服（當時係新車嘛），風景好靚，14蚊返到家好抵！
不過係石壁搭嶼巴23去東涌要成15個幾，好貴！（全程23個幾呀！）
> (2) 您認為在新機場啟用後,哪一條線最有機會成為'線王'?
我稔．．．S64！（不過要市民識去搭先係！）
另外，A21經唔經長沙灣？我睇木瓜的廣告話只去到旺角．．．
AS3/AV112 風間火月
Article 10: (Request 2)
> (1) 您第一次乘青嶼幹線巴士是在何時,是哪條線呢?
我係開線當日, ,剛剛考完上晝試入荃灣坐 E31, 等左兩個鐘.
再坐 E21 出旺角.
> (2) 您認為在新機場啟用後,哪一條線最有機會成為'線王'?
所有 A 線及 S64.
Article 10: (Request 3)
我 係 在 98/05/22 通 車 當 日 坐 E31 東 涌 頭 班 車 過 青 嶼 幹 線 架 !
不 過 我 估 條 條 線 都 有 相 當 既 客 量 ， 線 王 誰 屬 就 難 以 定 奪 ， 都 係 估 S64 啦 .
Article 10: (Request 4)
第一次坐龍運、第一次過青馬大橋、第一次去大嶼山唔駛坐船......
盡在青嶼幹線開張第一日！（好似五月廿二日）
當日約埋班豬朋狗友於太古，往金鐘（搭地龍）轉９３０直驅荃灣。
就埋站時，嘩！Ｎ咁多人等Ｅ３１。又唔咁心走人，咪排左兩個半鐘
。一路上風光如畫（～～），去到東涌後見冇乜路行咪搭３號嶼巴出
梅窩再食Ｍ記行坐飛翔船返中環。
１０：００太古出發
１８：００返到中環
列治文‧卑詩省‧加拿大 Cambie／No.4 Rd.站長
Article 11:
Re: some questions
100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) at Wed May 20 20:12, 1998 said:
> 2102 (mirage13@netvigator.com) said:
> Before when I live in Geelong.I always go to Melborne.
> In Melbourne,I saw some Volvo 3 axle single decker bus.
> Any body know which kind of bus is it?
Probably Volvo B10M, where Singapore Bus Service has a few copies as 'city' bus version.
> And there is Mrs.wong runing there as I know
> Fares for a trip$180(Hkd).
>
What did you mean by 'Mrs.Wong'? Atlanteans?
100 Wong
Article 11: (Request 1)
> SuperBuzz, Sydney (dccheng@acs.itd.uts.edu.au) said:
>
> They are probably the Volvo B10M coaches......though Volvo has produced some 14.5 single decks and the only one I know is with Westbus of Sydney.
>
>
>
> They are the City Wanderer and City Explorer run by London Transport Bus Tours Pty. Ltd. But I think it's only A$20 for Adults for a one day pass while $30 for a two day pass. They entitle you to get on and off as often as you wish during the specified period.
hkd hk=hong Kong d=dollars
2102
Article 11: (Request 2)
In these days, HK$180 will be A$36 at least.
Article 12:
Re: 今晚8-9香港電台第五台有陳自瑜先生專訪!
DA82 (da82@netvigator.com) at Wed May 20 19:53, 1998 said:
> 511 (wckit@netvigator.com) said:
> 如題
請問係FM幾至幾呢?THANK YOU!
DA82,HB8095.
Article 12: (Request 1)
請問是什麼節目呢﹖(因為我想在internet上download。)
Article 12: (Request 2)
> Gary Tang (purity2@hkstar.com) said:
>
> AM783
FM106.8
Article 13:
63X咁早收工!
wp12a (gw7112li@netvigator.com) at Wed May 20 19:33, 1998 said:
剛o岩睇完版友張63M同63X o既傳單, 真係嚇o左一跳!
原來63M同63Xo既出荃灣/九龍尾車咁早開!
63M: 元朗東開11:10PM
63X: 天慈開10:10PM!
同邊區o的73K開9:56有得比!
咁即係話, 去屏山/洪水橋一帶探親/做o野o既市民仲慘過灰姑娘, 要出
九龍o既話, 十點左近就要去等尾班車, 過o左十一點三左右, 就冇巴士
出市區o勒! 依家68X元朗尾車開12:25, 第日提早兩個幾鐘頭收車!
仲有63X佐碼頭車開上午7:00, 無論點樣快, 冇8:00都唔到藍地, 叫o的
開早班o既工人搭乜車? 迫住入荃灣上63M, 定係去屯門搭輕鐵?
屏山洪水橋得番一長一短兩條獨市線, 除o左驚班次唔夠, 重要限時限
刻, 唉...
黃埔十二甲 字
Article 13: (Request 1)
> 德褔5D (97089033d@polyu.edu.hk) said:
>
>
> 呵呵！
> 如果想早點入去，好簡單，照搭６８Ｘ轉輕便鐵路就得；或可以搭Ｎ２４１
> 轉Ｎ２６０再轉輕鐵亦得；再唔係就搭地龍到荃灣轉５３都得！！！
> 夜晚，唔駛驚，有屯門／元朗最霸道的輕鐵，可以載你去元朗又得，屯門亦
> 得，市區就唔得。或者坐５３，嘗試一下黑夜飛馳青山公路的滋味！
>
> 講真，屏山、洪水橋和藍地一帶的居民和工作的朋友都幾唔抵，６３Ｍ和
> ６３Ｘ開車同收車早就不在話下，搭６３Ｍ比搭６４Ｍ／６８Ｍ被屈多六
> 毫子，雖則話去到青衣咁遠，個價錢是合理的，其實好似板友建議開
> ６８Ｐ咁都是一件好事。
> 嶺南的同學們也是受害的一群，因為冇 o左 條６９Ｘ，想去佐敦或尖沙咀
> 等地，就沒有像現在那麼方便！
>
> 不過銀包就慘囉！時間的損失亦不菲！
Maybe the drivers of Red Public Light Buses gain the greatest
benefits after 25/5.
Article 13: (Request 2)
> Benjamin (patben@netvigator.com) said:
> Firstly, the people live in Tin Shui Wai will not take 63X,
> the contribution of 63X in Tin Shui Wai is less. 69X and 63X
> will have the same destination, but 69X via Tai Lam Tunnel,
> thus, KMB will regarded there are less people take 63X(only
> people live in Ping Shan, Lam Tei will take this route only)
> , the people live in Tuen Mun will take other routes.
> Therefore, why the last departure of 63X in Tin Tsz will be
> 10:10 pm, it is very similar the first pharse of 69X from
> 1993-1995, her last departure is 11:00pm in Tin Shui
我支持 Benjamin兄的講法,因為在晚間藍地、洪水僑鄉民好少出市區,
再加上該處是鄉村地方,鄉民好早睡覺,唔想有咁多噪音.
VA-61~~~~~~港島區郡王候選人
Article 14:
Re: 問﹕跑馬地->佐碼
eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) at Wed May 20 23:22, 1998 said:
Zenga (96479104@plink.cityu.edu.hk) said:
> 小弟諗住找日去西九龍找行917線0既城市烏蠅(洗唔洗[手羅]烏蠅拍
> 黎捉呀﹖﹕P)之後返過海去佐碼﹐除917線外﹐有乜選擇﹖以平為原
> 則﹐時間唔趕﹒
冇選擇, 除非行路出怡和街轉 914.
> 另外﹐917線城記於中午前0係西九龍出車時段係幾時至幾時﹖呢輪大約
0700-1100 12 mins
1100-1500 15 mins
1500-2136 12 mins
一個鐘一段時間, 跑馬地 0700 城記頭車.
> 有幾多隻烏蠅“飛”緊917線﹖呀﹗
三隻左右卦.
> 仲有﹐大家認為騎917線烏蠅﹐係唔係要騎到上跑馬地總站﹐至能完全感受到佢
> 0既威力呢﹖
917 唔上山架喎! 1 號先上.
Article 14: (Request 1)
上斜威力? 反話o下話. 想感受下就睇下搭到 1 號與否.
在行西隧時, 應是烏蠅發出魅力所在.
搭過兩次城蠅的智叔
Article 14: (Request 2)
> Claymon (wang5@hknet.com) said:
> 上斜威力? 反話o下話. 想感受下就睇下搭到 1 號與否.
我有個非巴士迷朋友有日對我說那批烏蠅行1號上跑馬地總站完
全無力, 還說笑話那些烏蠅和小強(蟑螂)比併上山, 小強一定勝喎!
綠川光
Article 14: (Request 3)
我一時醒起110線﹐請問0係銅鑼灣區﹐邊度有110線站返過佐碼﹖
最好教埋我由跑馬地總站﹐點去到0個度﹒同埋110線中午之後﹐
幾點至幾點係九記時段﹖110線由西灣河落到銅鑼灣要幾耐﹖我想
騎九記0既AN﹐有無機﹖
咁係唔係西九龍城記中午前開0800-0900﹐1000-1100﹖
唔知丫嗎﹗
Article 15:
Re: 251
Stanley Yung (n281@hkstar.com) at Thu May 21 00:51, 1998 said:
> VA-61【郡主】 (kyy690@netvigator.com) said:
> 下星期二,大欖隧道巴士線正式面世,九記將元朗、天水圍的路線重組,
> 唯獨最近隧道的錦田、石崗一帶就沒有考慮重組系列之內,又沒有另外
> 在該區一帶加新路線經大欖隧道出市區,唔知九記搞乜?
>
傳九巴會於7月開辦rt.251
使用原機場車行走
而減少rt.51班次
Article 15: (Request 1)
> 德褔5D (97089033d@polyu.edu.hk) said:
>
> 其實可不可以開兩條路線像城記３７Ａ，３７Ｂ那樣呢？
>
> 建議如下：
>
> ２５１Ａ 荃灣碼頭 往 錦田 （循環線：經錦田）
> 荃灣碼頭開：大河道，青山公路，屯門公路，大欖隧道，元朗引道，錦上路
> 支路，錦上路（西行），錦田公路（東行），錦上路（西行），
> 錦上路支路，元朗引道，大欖隧道，屯門公路，青山公路，西
> 樓角路，大河道。
>
> ２５１Ｂ 荃灣碼頭 往 錦田 （循環線：經上村）
> 荃灣碼頭開：大河道，青山公路，屯門公路，大欖隧道，元朗引道，錦上路
> 支路，錦上路（東行），錦田公路（西行），錦上路（西行），
> 錦上路支路，元朗引道，大欖隧道，屯門公路，青山公路，西
> 樓角路，大河道。
>
> 用車：ＤＡＲＴ仔
>
> 這樣便可以服務整個錦田、石岡和錦上路沿途的乘客。
>
> 請其他板友給些意見。謝謝！
其實，照德福５Ｄ兄所提議的，才能真正滿足錦田區民的需要，君不
知現時是有很多泥？的在載客的，每位的收費是十元，有的十三元，
前往荃灣地鐵大河道北的那個五十一號站，而且，那些車，不消三分
鐘便有一班了。反觀，五十一的早上班次是七至八分鐘一班，但是，
都是部部頂閘，而Dart仔更可以在總站時已經上滿了，全程不停站直
出荃灣，所以，其實如果真的行大欖隧道的話，便應該用十一米雙層
空調車了，九巴很多時的作風都是很保守，而現時非繁時51的客量，
也比60M,66M那些屯門大線的多，而繁時等車的時間也比那些大線多！
但耐可九巴不能因應乘客的需求而改善服務，一向都是錦田的居民所
知的事實。而小弟，作為一個巴士迷，曾經在51，64K各站，貼上過了
膠的那些傳真時間表，讓乘客們知道多一些關於巴士服務的事，但那
些東西，很快便消失了，不知何解的？
而實際上，51的客量可以分兩段的，第一段，就是錦田市的那些站，
而其餘的乘客均在錦上路，所以版友們如果在下午的時間坐51的話，
應該見過不少的乘客在雷公田巴士站下車的，轉乘綠小回家，這個真
是51線的缺點，如果51真的用Dart行三分鐘一班的話，也是無補於是
的，因為51根本上就唔可以有那麼多的客量去行一部那麼少的車，怎
樣加班次都是沒用的，因為當巴士到了荃錦交匯處前的五分鐘車程的
地方，一定會塞車的。所以，如果越來越多巴士的時候，咪又是塞在
車團內。倒不如加多一條線由上村經錦上路來回往荃灣。這樣，乘客
便可以利用轉車站，前往港島往尖沙咀、旺角等地。小弟真的不明白
為何九巴不開一條這樣的線呢？如果251真的開辦的話，來回上村和
荃灣已經是足夠了，經錦上路，因為錦上路的人，現在已經是很難上
51線的巴士了。
Article 16:
Re: 繩的疑惑
德褔5D (97089033d@polyu.edu.hk) at Thu May 21 00:37, 1998 said:
> Alex Chan (alexki@netvigator.com) said:
> 今日下午我去了天水圍和元朗,但我路過的巴士站,不論是總站還是分
> 站,均發現站牌有一條打了結的尼龍繩,大家知不知為何會出現此奇怪
> 現象.(的確,我數過超過十個站有這些繩的出現).
>
> Alex Chan
正確的問：究竟是誰咁得閒走去[手羅]晒大欖隧道路線的宣傳單張？
Alex兄，小弟和你一樣，都只係見到條紅色尼龍繩。
另外，[手羅]晒Ｄ宣傳單張是不是犯法的，有冇人知道邊個做Ｄ咁無良
、自私的行為？
支持消滅巴士小偷的德褔5D
5D 德褔花園 往 紅磡 (循環線)
車費:$3.5 行車里數:18.1km 行車時間:60min
主力之一DC7456
Article 16: (Request 1)
個人估計,這是一個有組織集團的行動,因為據悉單張是昨天才出街
的,怎可能在一日內,元朗和天水圍的主要巴士總/分站的傳單,全部
消失!而以每一個站,九巴放下50張傳單供乘客索取計,估計至少有
500張以上的單張,已落入不法巴士愛好者手中.
對此,本人作出最嚴重的譴責!
可謂之:
偷竊大量巴士傳單者,無恥之徒也!
Alex Chan
Article 16: (Request 2)
免問,又係巴士竊賊出沒後的現象...
這些繩是縛63M/63X的單張的...
上次Ronald兄已講過,12/31B單張事件已經有一位巴士竊賊落網.
切勿以身試法.
Article 17:
Re: 870消息，你會信邊個﹖
Trident (ge_c44-9w@mariahc.com) at Thu May 21 01:04, 1998 said:
> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:
> 剛剛收到一封來自某城巴職員的e-mail。據他今日在火炭所見﹐870仍然在維修當中。
> 而它的車牌和車隊編號，並沒有任何改變。
> 日前有人指870的車牌和車隊編號已被更改，今日又有人說見到870行97。到底誰在
> 放流料 ﹖
人地都講到明係未經証實, 更請各版友鼎力相助尋車之際,
你就彈出來問何人放 ***流料***, 兄弟你真有意思! :)
Article 17: (Request 1)
可能是我所用的字眼有問題。首先在此致歉。
可是大家不妨留意一下某些板友在發放一些未經證實的消息的時候所用的字眼，的
確是有可能會誤導其他板友的。
Article 17: (Request 2)
> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:
> 剛剛收到一封來自某城巴職員的e-mail。據他今日在火炭所見﹐870仍然在維修當中。
> 而它的車牌和車隊編號，並沒有任何改變。
> 日前有人指870的車牌和車隊編號已被更改，今日又有人說見到870行97。到底誰在
> 放流料 ﹖
我信我自己對眼, 我自己見到係點咯, 咪係點囉.
Article 18:
Re: 免費牛河
Kwan (SFAC3A09@NETVIGATOR.COM) at Thu May 21 00:04, 1998 said:
> AL118(FF1819) (rainbowg@netvigator.com) said:
> 九龍區o既穿梭巴士網絡實在太完善, 以下是一條路線建議:
> (只在星期六, 日下午後才行得通, 不能倒轉遊!)
>
> 1. 在中港城出發, 坐K15去旺角新世紀廣場(20-25分鐘一班)!
> 2. 在新世紀廣場入油!
> 3. 坐新世紀穿梭巴士(冠忠Rosa)去李鄭屋!
> 4. 坐下一班(約20分鐘)穿梭巴士返新世紀廣場!
> 5. 即轉乘另一架冠忠Rosa上愛民村!
> 6. 轉冠忠Isuzu LT133L去黃埔(15-30分鐘一班)!
> 7. 轉另一架冠忠Isuzu LT133L去真善美村(30分鐘一班)!
> 8. 步行至譚公道恆記銀行坐慈雲山中心穿梭巴士(30分鐘一班, 通常用Benz O303/O328或Toyota Coaster)!
> 9. 在慈雲山轉乘另一架穿梭巴士去牛頭角彩霞村(30分鐘一班, 車型同上)!
> 10. 步行往德褔二期恆記大廈外!
> 11. 轉乘雅高顛佬去曉麗苑下車(20分鐘一班)!
> 12. 沿觀塘方向巴士站旁樓梯步行至翠屏南村翠櫻樓近泳池對面!
> 13. 轉乘冠忠巴士(車型不定)往將軍澳東港城(30分鐘一班)!
> 14. 轉乘另一架冠忠巴士往西貢(30分鐘一班)!
> 15. 是次牛河完畢!
>
> 歡迎提供意見!Thanks!
如果照你建議去做,一旦全部要等三十分鐘一班,
沒有四五小時都去唔成.
順便一提,有師傅講九鐵做K15做到有點意興闌珊,因為
大部份人都不是東鐵搭客.如果再此下去,隨時停駛.
Article 18: (Request 1)
30分鐘一班的全都係開00同30的, 我計過大約最多等20分鐘
Article 18: (Request 2)
> 3. 坐新世紀穿梭巴士(冠忠Rosa)去李鄭屋!
> 4. 坐下一班(約20分鐘)穿梭巴士返新世紀廣場!
咁樣搭法，好似冇乜意思喎！
> 9. 在慈雲山轉乘另一架穿梭巴士去牛頭角彩霞村(30分鐘一班, 車型同上)!
> 10. 步行往德褔二期恆記大廈外!
嘩！由彩霞村行過去德褔商場二期好遠 o架 ，小弟年輕力壯兼行捷徑都
要行三個字。
> 11. 轉乘雅高顛佬去曉麗苑下車(20分鐘一班)!
> 12. 沿觀塘方向巴士站旁樓梯步行至翠屏南村翠櫻樓近泳池對面!
咦？咁行法又駛唔駛行三、四個字呢？
總括而言，如果唔怕行路行得多的話，都不失為一個好建議。
5D 德褔花園 往 紅磡 (循環線)
車費:$3.5 行車里數:18.1km 行車時間:60min
主力之一DC7456
Article 19:
Re: [幻想]老虎沙仔&老虎雞
Colin Chang (kalim@netvigator.com) at Wed May 20 22:30, 1998 said:
> 沙電學徒 (ranger@hknet.com) said:
> 得,是可以的.
> 點做呢?方法係O甘,先將
> 車頭的部份(頭燈,車頭路線牌位置),車尾部份的車身件,所有車窗,
> 車內的防火板,車內千維等全部拆下,分別于車頭及車尾壯上老虎頭
> 車身部件,所有車窗壯上黑邊車窗,車內防火板是白色的,坐位吾變,就
> 係O甘,一部老虎頭車身的沙仔就誕生了.部老虎沙仔睇落此一部宿水的
> 老虎頭.吾矢O事實會吾會O甘呢?!
一睇個標題我仲以為抬副康明斯LTA10上BL度，加個ZF4前
跟住我就諗唔知雞車可唔可以裝LTA10又或者6LXCT
嘩！咁仲得了？飛雞！？
Article 19: (Request 1)
> 沙電學徒 (ranger@hknet.com) said:
>
>
> O個部利蘭11 吉拿熱狗(GL 2148 S3BL364)個車身是老虎頭車身,
> 但引擎仍是吉拿G.6 LXCT.
>
> 至于頭先我所講的老虎沙仔,引擎用反吉拿G.6 LXB會好O的
> 因為沙仔CHASSIS承受吾度O甘大馬力.
你估換層皮就係老虎咩! 0甘'立'惡得去邊?
陳義
Article 20:
何謂'改善服務'
LV123 (95155644d@polyu.edu.hk) at Wed May 20 19:44, 1998 said:
你們認為何謂'改善服務'?
1. 熱狗轉冷馬
2. 加密班次
3. 車廂更整潔
4. ... (歡迎加上)
若以上三項(或更多項)全有的話, 當然是好的.
但若你只可選一項的話, 你會選那一項?
我會選第二項. 早點到目的地點都好過. 要歎冷氣不如番屋企.
LV123
Article 20: (Request 1)
其 實 「 改 善 服 務 」 呢 個 詞 彙 又 幾 值 得 去 考 究 ，
其 中 熱 狗 轉 冷 馬 無 疑 是 服 務 上 既 「 改 變 」 ，
但 「 善 」 唔 「 善 」 就 又 係 好 主 觀 既 :
車 費 可 能 要 俾 多 Ｄ ；
車 箱 唔 夠 冷 氣 就 仲 慘 過 搭 熱 狗 !
Article 20: (Request 2)
> 水魚 Waterfish (AV314) (jimes@netvigator.com) said:
> 最緊要係車長服務態度好,班次準
>
> 水魚Waterfish
> AV314 (968字軋)
仲有,唔好成日收車,cut補水,減行車時間,不要迫車長學ISO,
攪到人心惶惶
Article 21:
Re: 龍躉~~~~~~
Aqua856 (tsesh@hkstar.com) at Wed May 20 22:29, 1998 said:
> VA51‧塞米一條‧錠真治 (parnell@hkstar.com) said:
> 有無人有龍運的都普躉相呢?有的話就post上來丫~~~~~
> 住在西灣河的我點都無可能無端端跑去屯門看都普躉丫~~~~~
LWB just has this type of Trident
---
Aqua
Article 21: (Request 1)
龍運邊有Duple躉呢?
全部都是大眼雞魚o黎嫁!
旗下沒有Duple躉的龍巴(TTB)公司的總裁
ATR1~~~HJ2127
S3N121~~~DP5782
Article 21: (Request 2)
屯門廠那批係Alexander ALX500 Tridento黎
嫁喎.
飛機竺
Article 22:
Re: 有關城巴極速的問題
Hanvas 漢 華 (hanvas@netvigator.com) at Wed May 20 18:48, 1998 said:
> Present (pollymfy@netvigator.com) said:
> 本人是新加入之會員, 我想問一些有關城巴的問題
>
> 1) 城巴11米之leyland 是否能夠泵到110-120km/h架?
> 2) 城巴12米之leyland 亦是否能夠去到110km/h 架?
其 實 如 果 部 車 入 空 波 落 斜 ，
而 條 路 既 Friction 又 唔 係 太 大 ，
照 計 極 速 係 咪 應 該 Tend to infinite 既 呢 ?!
Article 22: (Request 1)
空波, 即係只有兩種 forces acting on the bus: gravity 同
friction. 當 gravity 所產生的力量係相等於 friction 的時候,
架巴士就不再加速, 以均速前進. In other words, 架巴士已達到
它的 terminal velocity 了.
當然, 如果條路的 friction 太細的話, 架巴士都起唔到步啦, 點上
山落斜呀? :p
讀 Physics 讀到傻o既
Roger
Article 22: (Request 2)
> Present (pollymfy@netvigator.com) said:
> 本人是新加入之會員, 我想問一些有關城巴的問題
>
> 1) 城巴11米之leyland 是否能夠泵到110-120km/h架?
> 2) 城巴12米之leyland 亦是否能夠去到110km/h 架?
It could be the case if the speed limiter was NOT there.
Article 23:
Re: Route雜誌加E33路線資料
Flying Chuk (chuk@netvigator.com) at Wed May 20 17:44, 1998 said:
> Dennis Lau (ss78k@netteens.net) said:
> Route雜誌加E33路線資料，歡迎參觀！
>
> 仲有，Long Win職員話E33會在5月26日開。
>
>
> Dennis Lau
但有版友話係5月22喎,究竟係邊日呀?
飛機竺
Article 23: (Request 1)
22/5 開咁點行汀九橋呀? 運輸署唔係要統一巴士線同一日行三號幹線麼?
Article 24:
Re: 運輸署的建議
AL118(FF1819) (rainbowg@netvigator.com) at Wed May 20 23:27, 1998 said:
> Jason (auysch@netvigator.com) said:
> 剛剛睇完觀塘星報,佢話運輸署建議o係26號同224X加入附有
> 傷殘人仕設施的巴士,即係SLF或者Trident啦!
> 但係九記仲有冇車呢??
> 同埋呢兩條線有冇咁o既需要呢?
現時來說, 九記應該唔夠車!
但以順利同啟業來說, 應該有呢個需要! 但呢兩個屋村老弱較觀塘區其他屋村少(順利區較多), 與其照顧呢兩區, 不如先照顧牛頭角上下村及翠屏村o既乘客先, 呢三村出名觀塘老人村, 加上翠屏村有兩個庇護工場, 對低地台巴士需求應比啟業順利大!
所以我有以下建議:
先加低地台巴士去2A及11B(但不要調走我)
待有車再加落26同224X!
跟住加低地台落15, 16 服務藍田區!
最後加落219X同40!
FF1819
>
> Jason
> AA55
Article 24: (Request 1)
他屋村少(順利區較多), 與其照顧呢兩區, 不如先照顧牛頭角上下村及翠
屏村o既乘客先, 呢三村出名觀塘老人村, 加上翠屏村有兩個庇護工場,
對低地台巴士需求應比啟業順利大!
等下啦！九記自己批躉就崁啦！（聽司傅講的，崁完龍躉同3AD就開工）
2A，15，16，26落躉．．．爬山我行路隨時快過佢．．．
一行最多打30個中文字咋！打到水蛇春。甘長，點睇呀？
AS3/AV112 風間火月
Article 25:
Re: Could CMB have change history, if.....
100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) at Wed May 20 20:35, 1998 said:
> SuperBuzz, Sydney (dccheng@acs.itd.uts.edu.au) said:
> Base on this thread, could CMB change history if their buses stood out and attracted attention from the HK public??
>
> First of all, what have CMB done wrong??
Its lack of progress, or simply not moving ahead, means falling behind in service when comparing to the other two franchise bus operators in Hong Kong.
> They were the first company to introduce a substantial batch of double deck a/c buses, DA1-12, but why couldn't they attract attention??
> They used normal bus seats and the windows are openable, it really looked like the a/c unit was only retrofitted.
Ay yah! Have you been on DA1-36 about 2-3 years ago? These so called 'A/C' buses had NO A/C at all! (thus even much worse than hotdogs!) I heard back then CMB didn't even have an A/C department to fix A/C units on these DA's!
Please allow me to share some of my experiences.
1)When KMB opened 300 in 1990, CMB answered it right away with these DA's on 105. I gave CMB a chance and tried on one of those with EV license. (brand new back then!) Then not just me, almost all the passengers complained there was no A/C on the bus! A station master was on board and I questioned him, all he said was 'we have a different A/C system than KMB!'. (yeah right, the same Nippon Denso unit! Just different mechanics!)
2)Once my co-worker were going to Mongkok with me, I successfully persuaded him not to take MTR but 300 instead. One of these DA's came by and I told him I'd rather wait for the next one due to lack of A/C. He didn't believe me and we were 'baked' all the way to Mongkok!
3)Once I was waiting at the terminus of 300. A VA was parking there. I assumed that would be the next departure. Unfortunately one of those DA's came by instead. This time I wouldn't risk my dollar and pay premium for something worse than hotdog! I then proceeded to question the station master as to why he didn't allocate the VA in sequence. We had a big argument and and big fight and I boycotted CMB for a while.
>
Fortunately, the route I depended to go to work every morning, 301, CMB allocated DA45-49 plus LA11 plus a 'Daily Special'. Though my co-worker and I preferred to wait for the 'KMB time section' for more comfortable seats, until the traffic situation along Gloucestor Road worsen to the point I had to take CMB buses to avoid being late to work. (fortunately by this time the A/C units on these DA's have been fixed!)
Oh! I almost forgot to mention about those openable windows! I supposed you know it has been raining like hell in Hong Kong in the past few summers. Last summer I was on one of these DA's with openable windows. (I think it was DA23) The water was dripping into the cabin! The case was even worse in the driver's cabin, where the driver used towels and tried to soak up the water, and it was still 'flooding' the dashboard. I was really worry as the water might get into the electrical wirings thus cause some spark or fire!
> Other than this, what have CMB done wrong, and how it could have changed history??
If it ordered 300 A/C buses with its own 2+2 seatings (though I prefer CTB's better, CMB's are really comfortable and I prefer them over KMB's!) 3 years ago when more of its routes went to CTB, the history might have been changed.
Thanks for sharing my experience.
100 Wong
Article 25: (Request 1)
Well, in my opinion, this 'wrong' decision (which can be hardly judged) is enough for worsening CMB's corporate image. It is also important to note that the pace for CMB to purchase new A/C buses is comparatively slower than the other two franchised bus operators. Perhaps you can say this is another 'wrong' decision made by CMB.
Article 26:
Re: 離題問題TO:巴士迷選民
Wayne (n170@netvigator.com) at Thu May 21 01:14, 1998 said:
> Jess (c5013830@hkbu.edu.hk) said:
> 星期日便是三(四)年一度的立法會(局)選舉,請問各有權投票的巴士
> 迷會用怎樣的準則來厘定選誰,會否選一些對交通政策較佳的侯選組
>
> 不如在此攪一次巴士迷網上立法會投票.
>
> 請各位選民列明閣下(所屬選區){投那一組別}和原因.
> 小弟(新界西){民協/x衍華}因他兩組都較注重當區的交通,尤為前者
> 在屯公封路,後者在青衣對外交通方面均做得不錯.不像第1,2組要
> 取消屯公巴士專線;7組更盛讚輕鐵取代巴士服務及建議以小巴或非
> 專利路線代替專利路線等...
>
> 而未有資格做選民亦可發表閣下的意見.
>
> 仲未考完試,不過覆覆e-mail順便上來的傻Jess
>
> 由於被朋友提醒,若以明示或暗示任仃一名參選者,必要說及其它.
> 故不如打一次名單:(純椊靠記憶,有錯請說)
> 香港島:陸恭蕙,莊陳有,民建聯,自由黨,民主黨,梁永安,周潔冰,李鴻
> 九龍東:民主黨,民建聯,霍佩議
> 九龍西:民主黨,民協,鍾懿芳,自由黨,民建聯
> 新界西:民主黨,新界聯盟,梁耀忠,前錢,丁衍華,自由黨,民建聯,
> 新界西:嚴天生,林致良,123民主聯盟,楊福廣
> 新界東:民主黨,黃宏發,雷一嗚,前錢,民建聯,自由黨,簡炳墀.
> 不好意思,阻了那麼多空位.
香港島:民主黨
九龍東:民主黨
九龍西:民主黨
新界西:前錢
新界東:前錢
Article 26: (Request 1)
Dr.Salo VOTE
Article 27:
Bus bodies.
100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) at Wed May 20 21:22, 1998 said:
Questions are often asked here as to which body do you like the most. I often see many answers, though most of you didn't provide any reason or justification as to 'why' you prefer such body. Styling? Comfort?
I assume many of you like ALX500 because of its 'smile'. Not that I don't like 'smile', (indeed, I smile all the time!) however, the technical specifications of Alexander simply just don't impress me.
It all started with how Alexander 'offered' such specification used by KMB on its AL's, AV1-13? and 3AV1-170, hence I have such complicated prefer seats as discussed in.
http://home.hkstar.com/~kenf/hkbdb/read.cgi?t=10111&a=14
Hence, whenever I ride on these buses, I often have to give up my favourite window seats for the nice view outside in preference to better A/C or cooling comfort.
Just imagine if you seat in the first row on 3AV1-170. Thanks to the large windscreen area, these are the hottest spots in the bus, especially in sunny days! (you practically get no A/C at these positions at all!)
I've analyzed this with another bus fan (without Internet access). We both agree this is not a problem for Dragons, or even CMB's Olympians. Why? The air vents are place to blow to the windows, hence being able to cool off the heat transferring from the windows. (especially on sunny days!)
Of course, adjustable air-vents are always the better choice, which Duple Metsec had done by no longer offering fixed air vents from AD246 onwards, and all KMB Dragons have adjustable air-vents since then! (same case goes to CMB for its DA's!)
Also, I really hate Alexander 'R' type's tradition by having an extremely small bay between the driver's cabin and the staircase. These two seats are extremely cramped and bus companies even (have to?) install a pole in between! Not so the case for Duple Metsec bodies. The 'bay' is large enough to seat 4-5 across without a pole! That's the reason why I like CTB's 'coach' version Olympians so much!
From the above, I sure wasn't too impressed with 'big smile' ALX500 body. The first time I sat into 2200, the impression I got was this wasn't much different than the 'R' type, and in CTB's case, the adjustable vents have always been there! Even the 'half bay' from the 'R' type is retained. This shows how much Alexander is 'dedicated' to develop a new product! (cost saving measure as it can offer a 11m version if needed, ignoring the trend for buses, or Trident in particular, being either 10.6m or 12m.)
Though I haven't been on a 'goldfish tank' Duple bodied Trident before, from photos and comments by other bus fans, they're drastically different from the bodies on Dragons. At least from the outside, it looks a lot different! (the 'half bay' is no longer available!)
Of course, I'm not an 'all Duple Metsec' person, as shown by my comments regarding bodies on Dart earlier at
http://home.hkstar.com/~kenf/hkbdb/read.cgi?t=10341&a=7
Sorry for not knowing HTML, and I do want to know what are the reasons and why you prefer such and such bus body.
100 Wong
Article 27: (Request 1)
> Thomas Kwong (twlkwong@netvigator.com) said:
>
> I really don't study much about the interior of buses. But in terms of aesthetics, I think that the Duple Metsec jubilants are quite ugly, but on the other hand, Duple metsec Dragons are quite nice, even though they are box-shaped. Also, I must say that from the outside, the Alexander R-type bodies are attractive, and DL2 DOES have a centre staircase.......but I cannot say much as I don't know much about this aspect of buses. As for the Alexander AVs and 3AVs, I really think that they don't look too nice....maybe I see them too often.........
I guess you really enjoy looking at buses more than sitting inside then!
However, I think I do spend a good amount of time inside a bus, thus comfort inside a bus becomes my priority, rather than looks.
Yes, I do enjoy looking at buses too, that's why I prefer to sit by the offside window most of the time. (except KMB and Alexander force me to sit by the aisle on AL's and AV1-13? and 3AV1-170) However, there is often nothing much to look at after dark! For examples,
Last summer I tried E22 during typhoon signal No.3 after work. Heavy rain and darkness reduced outward visibility to near zero. However, I made myself comfortable by enjoying at my favourite seat!
Or else I often couldn't see much on the opposite direction along Tuen Mun Highway and Tolo Highway after dark, can't really enjoy other buses' styling then!
Hence, I value the interior of a bus more important than the outside. Isn't that the reason why many like MAN 2500 of CTB? (the body doesn't look that good, but the interior is really nice!)
100 Wong
PS. Thanks for reminding me about Alexander bodied Dragon/Condor with centre staircase, though that's no concern to me as I won't take any hotdog again! (unless these buses are retrofitted with A/C units, which is next to impossible!) Also, please don't forget the 'practical' advantages of Duple Metsec bodies on Jubilants (KMB) and Leyland Victory MkII (CMB). In both cases, although the Duple Metsec body looks like coffins in my brother's eyes, you can't deny their weight saving advantages over its Alexander counterparts, hence providing better performance for these buses.
Article 28:
Re: 問中記鎖油缸
Colin Chang (kalim@netvigator.com) at Thu May 21 12:31, 1998 said:
> AL118(FF1819) (rainbowg@netvigator.com) said:
> 請問中記各款車鎖幾多呢?
>
> 希望有板友解答, 謝謝!
鎖油缸？油門係咪呀？
約數：LV, DS三十三到三十六咪，大小珍寶四十到四十二咪，DA, DM, ML, DL四十二咪
LA, LM, VA 五十咪。
由於每架車性能有所不同，數字會有出入。
Article 28: (Request 1)
> AL118(FF1819) (rainbowg@netvigator.com) said:
> 請問中記各款車鎖幾多呢?
>
> 希望有板友解答, 謝謝!
有D 車冇鎖 , 小弟坐過 780 架 VA(VA1-30O個批) ,
O係東廊開到 100 KM/h .
GU8933(ADS138)
CA3778(N18)
Article 29:
博愛迴旋處問題!
Dickson2 (dickson2@macau.ctm.net) at Thu May 21 00:27, 1998 said:
其實大家都是一直關心三號幹線通車後, 大部份的巴士都途經博愛迴
旋處. 但是我周日去過現場視察環保. 由元朗上迴旋處的路由單線擴
闊雙線. 而且有跡象顯示最左線上三號幹線不需要先讓迴旋處的車.
即是說會油上雙白線, 使到車輛更加流通. 但是另一方面, 由三號幹
線經博愛迴旋處時, 令到塞車情況更加大. 因為所有三號幹線往元朗
的車都是經過此路, 而且進入迴旋處時, 又要讓在迴旋行駛中的汽車,
所以我不擔心元朗出九龍, 反而擔心入元朗!
Dickson2
Article 29: (Request 1)
冇錯。當年凹頭日日塞入元朗都是因為迴旋處。那個凹頭迴旋處，由於入
元朗方向要先讓往錦田方向的車輛，偏偏入錦田的車又多，所以塞車閒閒
地都塞到去禽獸花園，仲要由朝塞到晚。之後，每日都有位警察叔叔控制
入錦田的車，情況至好Ｄ咋。自從起了橋和加了交通燈控制入錦田的車後
，情況得到改善，搭２７６／２７６Ｐ的人就越來越多。因為以前搭
２７６真的不是很快，往上水就快，因為冇塞車的問題，小弟試過搭
２７６（ＡＭ）由上水去凹頭要４０分鐘，其中大部份時間花在塞車上。
反而由凹頭去上水暢通無阻，１５分鐘就到，係塞都係塞在掃管埔路的迴
旋處（又係迴旋處）。
現在博愛交匯處入元朗的車，將會重現當年凹頭迴旋處的問題，因為經元
朗公路去錦田方向的車都不少，這樣很阻礙車輛由三號幹線的車入元朗。
另外，未來５４，６４Ｋ，７６Ｋ，７７Ｋ的乘客將會被捲入塞車地帶，
因為它們出入都要經過博愛交匯處。
5D 德褔花園 往 紅磡 (循環線)
車費:$3.5 行車里數:18.1km 行車時間:60min
主力之一DC7456
Article 29: (Request 2)
其實我認為九巴和政府應該為巴士路線而作出一些特別安排, 首先會
在三號幹線博愛出口前設定巴士線, ５４，６４Ｋ，７６Ｋ，７７Ｋ
，６８Ｍ，６８Ｘ等來往凹頭迴旋處與博愛迴旋處之間的路線應該改
行博愛迴旋處橋低直過，另到巴士不需要走入博愛的塞車陣．但是長
遠目標都是由迴旋處改為封閉式立交橋．
Dickson2
Article 30:
Re: 802,811
DA82 (da82@netvigator.com) at Thu May 21 10:03, 1998 said:
> Wayne (n170@netvigator.com) said:
> 如要想映 中記 802,811 的雄姿, 現只剩 23/05/1998(沙田銀瓶)
> & 06/06/1998 (伯爵金盃/英國葉森打) 兩天.
>
> TIME
> 23/05 1600-1745
> 06/06 2115-2245
以上的時間,是不是沙田馬場出時間?
謝謝!
DA82,HB8095.
Article 30: (Request 1)
應該是它們在沙田馬場stand-by的時間。(別忘記此兩線是不設回程的。)
Article 31:
Re: 問題
Benjamin (patben@netvigator.com) at Thu May 21 00:05, 1998 said:
> TONY(S3M61) (wclui@vtech.net) said:
>
> 近期本人發現276P果D 3AV裝有八達通收費機(Eg:3AV257,3AV335,3AV336......),請問果D八達
> 通機可否使用?以前是否行過968?
Those Octopus machine can be used, but I don't know why KMB
still not use them. Those 3AV is belonged to 276P, then
when 968 was opened, those 3AV was shifted to 968(except
3AV335 and 3AV336), 3AV335 and 3AV336 are those two 3AV
which join 276P very lately.
Benjamin
AD239-GN921
921-GW2858
Article 32:
Re: 68,69系車冷馬一問?
Benjamin (patben@netvigator.com) at Wed May 20 23:37, 1998 said:
> 沙電學徒 (ranger@hknet.com) said:
> 欖隧通車後,原有64M,68M,68X,69M,69X現在用緊O的冷馬
> 利蘭冷馬,AD 3+2冷馬,AV 冷馬(69M O個O的)會吾會用來行欖隧呢?
> 因為部份車有廣告,有同廣告product sign合同.
Yes, AV will be widely used in 69X, 69M and 68X, AD and some
AL will be used in 64M and may be in 63M and 63X
Benjamin
AD239-GN921
921-GW2858
Article 33:
Re: Bus model
100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) at Wed May 20 20:06, 1998 said:
> Jacky 阿一 (jackyfok@netvigator.com) said:
> Does anybody know where to buy bus model?
> Especially old bus.
Try 80'N' in Prince Edward, its 'brother' shop in Western Market. Also, there is an 'antique' store in Western Market that you might be able to find some old bus models as well.
Also try 90'N' in West Point and those shops in Tai Yuen Street in Wan Chai. Prices at these places could be steep though.
100 Wong
Article 34:
Re: Guess
100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) at Wed May 20 20:15, 1998 said:
> DA74(780) (c3035083@hkstar.com) said:
> Which routes do you think will use larger bus to run on
> Dragon boat festival?
>
> I think:
> 1)6X may used 9xx.It was used last year.
2)973? For the same reasoning as above?
3)262? CMB has been doing this recently anyway!
100 Wong
Article 35:
Re: 3 號幹線通車後的巴士路線?
LA11 Shing (b493332@hkstar.com) at Wed May 20 22:02, 1998 said:
> Ken (id02271@netvigator.com) said:
> 我想知道,究竟3號幹線將來的巴士路線會有邊幾條呢?
> 而且行3號幹線的巴士會唔會採用 Dennis Trident 行駛呢?
> 有消息話,E33將於22/5/1998投入服務,而且會採用 Dennis Trident > 行駛,係唔係真既呢?
Hello , Mr . Ken , 行經 '' 三號幹線 '' 0既巴士線有 :
( 01 ) 64M 天耀村 - 荃灣地鐵站
( 02 ) 68M 朗屏村 - 葵盛圍
( 03 ) 68X 元朗(東) - 佐敦道碼頭
( 04 ) 69M 天瑞村 - 葵芳地鐵站
( 05 ) 69X 天瑞村 - 佐敦道碼頭
( 06 ) 269B 天水圍 - 紅磡碼頭
( 07 ) 269C 天水圍 - 觀塘碼頭
( 08 ) 968 元朗(西) - 銅鑼灣(天后) (經西隧)
( 09 ) E34 天水圍市中心 - 新機場地面運輸中心 (新線,龍運經營)
( 10 ) 969 天水圍市中心 - 銅鑼灣(摩頓台) (經西隧,城巴經營)
共10條巴士線會行經三號幹線 .
而行經三號幹線的巴士將會 '' 全空調服務 '' ,
主要用3AD , AV , 3AV 等車行走 ,
至於E33 0既問題 , 已經證實0左會0係22/5/1998投入服務 ,
用0既車種應該會係 Dennis Trident , 12米 Volvo 可能會係
副選 .
LA11 Shing FF7869
Article 36:
Re: 'Oh, is this a new bus?
100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) at Wed May 20 23:37, 1998 said:
> SuperBuzz, Sydney (dccheng@acs.itd.uts.edu.au) said:
> This was what an Asian Lady said when she got on one of the three more than 10-year old Volvo B10M coach running on Westbus, Sydney's route 610.
>
> The concerned bus, or coach, I should say, is a 3.9 metre tall 5-star luxury coach with reclining seats, all in the last decade's fashion though. But why did she say it was a new 'bus'??
>
> It was due to the fact that it was a taller vehicle and it stood out. The door is the outward opening type and it attract attenntion. (For those who don't know, it opens like a car's front door).
>
> And most of all, people would never expect a coach doing bus work!!!
>
> Back to the question, how, what, why do people define a new bus, or coach?? What sort of things will they look for??
A joke (though possible) response would be by license plate! Hence CMB's DA65, DA70 would be over 10 years old (don't I wish to have these DA's over 10 years ago!) buses and VA34 and VA40 would be a bit older than they should be! :)
100 Wong
Article 37:
Re: 城巴配都普的Trident是在邊度裝嵌呢?
GU8933 (w0108@netvigator.com) at Wed May 20 17:46, 1998 said:
> Kevin (z094530@school.net.hk) said:
> 如題.
> Kevin
應該是葡萄牙 .
城巴好多都普龍都係葡萄牙裝車身.
(資料來自陳X瑜的香港巴士手冊城巴篇)
GU8933(ADS138)
CA3778(N18)
Article 38:
【網頁更新】30x巴士網頁
M!2 (matt4127@netteens.net) at Wed May 20 17:10, 1998 said:
30x巴士網頁的投票站現已更新,上次投票結果亦已公佈.
今期投票內容:最有型巴士
30x 巴士網頁
Article 39:
大家點?
VA51‧塞米一條‧錠真治 (parnell@hkstar.com) at Wed May 20 17:44, 1998 said:
大家認為顏氏會唔會改做非專利巴士果行呢?因為我無端端記起早
排(都係幾個月之前的事咯!)有板友話顏叔叔會改做非專利巴士呢!
好耐無上hkbdb的
VA51‧塞米一條‧錠真治
Article 40:
Now you can read bus magazines online...
SuperBuzz, Sydney (dccheng@acs.itd.uts.edu.au) at Wed May 20 17:49, 1998 said:
Australasian Bus & Coach Magazine.
And I would like to suggest you people a body builder's website.
Designline Bus and Coach Builders, 'Tomorrow's design today.'
Article 41:
Do you know this??
SuperBuzz, Sydney (dccheng@acs.itd.uts.edu.au) at Wed May 20 18:17, 1998 said:
Alan B. Denning, a bus builder group has been supplying buses, coaches and bodies to China over the past year. The buses supplied are MB LO814 Vario, MB OH 1621 and bodies for the 'Yaxing Benz', which is a MB built in China by Yaxing Motor Group.
And now, Australia's largest bus builder, Austral Pacific Group has built a MAN 18.310 coach with APG's Aspire body. It is identical to Australian ones......but the speed limiter, which means it can run up to 120 Km/h on Chinese Freeways!!!
Article 42:
Article: Reliability Snag for Gas Buses
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Wed May 20 19:18, 1998 said:
The following article is extracted from today's (20.5.98) West Australian:
RELIABILITY SNAG FOR GAS BUSES (By Mark Mallabone and Torrance Mendez)
Premier Richard Court has revealed that a lack of reliability warranties on natural gas-powered buses led to the State Government's decision to buy 128 diesel buses.
Transport officials admit they agreed with the decision even though they did not know whether diesel or natural gas was better for the city.
Perth will get 128 Mercedes-Benz diesel buses and another five powered by compressed natural gas by next year in the first part of a 12-year contract worth $290 million.
In the Legislative Assembly yesterday, Mr Court said he would have much preferred for Perth to be serviced by a gas-powered fleet.
But the Government decided it would have been irresponsible to go ahead with that option when manufacturers could not offer warranties for both the fuel-injection technology and the overall reliability of gas buses.
Unsuccessful tenders - including Renault and Scania - did offer general warranties for gas buses but not specific reliability warranties.
' It is one thing to have a warranty but, if a bus is unreliable, we would be irresponsible unless we could get in writing from the manufacturer that guarantee that the bus would be as reliable as the (diesel) option,' Mr Court said.
Transperth director Brett Inchley admitted on Monday that officials did not know whether diesel or natural gas was better. The order about to be placed for diesel buses was a deferral of any decision to buy gas buses until more information was available.
Asked if it would not be better to do the evaluation before the $290 million order, Mr Inchley said Perth needed new buses quickly.
' Our fleet has an average age of 13 1/2 years,' he said. ' We felt it important not to hold up the supply of buses.'
Opposition transport spokesman Alannah MacTiernan said outside Parliament that the Government was fumbling to justify its decision to proceed with the diesel option.
Ms MacTiernan said the Government appeared to have prematurely chosen Mercedes Benz as its preferred tenderer without seriously considering the options put by other tenderers.
She said it was unheard of for companies to be required to offer reliability guarantees over and above normal guarantees.
Renault and Scania had stated in writing they could offer full warranties.
Renault said it understood that its tender was the cheapest of the nine bids received.
In another development, Transperth has admitted the bus deal won by Mercedes Benz did not include refinancing the fleet.
The Government had sought a financier to buy the buses which would then be supplied to Transperth for a fee. In turn, Transperth would provide them to the bus companies.
Mr Inchley said research was needed before any contract could proceed.
Article 43:
Re: E33 泊位
Friend of Tuen Mun (chung921@hkstar.com) at Wed May 20 20:17, 1998 said:
> 水魚(AV314) (jimes@netvigator.com) said:
> 今日去屯中總站, 見到本身輕鐵巴士站條坑已經搬左
> 去961站前面,而本身站牌則有份通告
> 內容大約是運輸處要收回站坑予龍運巴士
> 所以由1998年5月20日(今日)起將站搬去961站前
>
> 口甘 即係E33用 輕鐵的巴士坑
>
> 水魚Waterfish
> AV314 (968字軋)
A59站冇上蓋,今日仲落雨添
Article 44:
Citybus 城巴 45
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Wed May 20 19:20, 1998 said:
Does anybody know whether or not CTB's 45 has finished its conversion into a tow truck or not?
有沒有人知道城巴的45完成了工程車的改裝工程沒有﹖
Article 45:
83K Bus Page updated
Aqua856 (tsesh@hkstar.com) at Wed May 20 22:25, 1998 said:
Add the ECW in bodywork Center, go and see seeLA!!!
---
856
Sorry beause last thread I use Java, so.....
Article 46:
No. 3 Highway Advertisement
Crab (cshcsh@netvigator.com) at Wed May 20 21:35, 1998 said:
今日見到上了No.3 Highway 之Advertisement 走961
Article 47:
票機問題
Jess (c5013830@hkbu.edu.hk) at Wed May 20 21:12, 1998 said:
1.點解近來D屯門M線又裝回票機?
唔通唔裝八達通?
2.又有3BL訓練車試A31了,還走入塞車塞死的環角街.
3.請問由石碧去長沙搭甚麼最平?如班次很少,請列明班次.
(TO 偉釗,睇唔到你個網頁1號車邊D有雙向分段)
Article 48:
點解有鬼佬出現?
Kwan (SFAC3A09@NETVIGATOR.COM) at Wed May 20 20:55, 1998 said:
今日特別走去柴灣影相,在巴士廠對面的巴士站
見到有兩個外國人和中巴職員在談話,他們一時
講LV,一時講LF 的性能.他們還上車參觀及影相.
他們會不會是新巴的人呢? 抑或是買舊車呢?
我已影了他們的'玉照'.明天登出.
P.S. 如果有人能參加參觀柴廠的話,可否幫我影
兩張相(因為我去不到)
Article 49:
New transfer coupon
Route 99 (ayeung@vol.net) at Wed May 20 23:20, 1998 said:
Is that true that KMB will issue a transfer coupon for
passenger to transfer other buses at the No. 3 Highway?
If so, will that be a colour printing one or a black and
white coupon?
So eager to get one if the transfer coupon thing is true.
Article 50:
[AD.廣告]九巴雞KMB G
Felix Tse (b1wkca22@pop1.sympatico.ca) at Thu May 21 12:37, 1998 said:
多倫多巴士網頁 Greater Toronto Bus Page 隆重巨獻﹕ ^_^
KMB Leyland Victory MkII Page
歡迎參觀及提供意見！
Please come visit!
--
Felix Tse
Article 51:
今日明報﹕城巴今年將增聘千人
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Thu May 21 12:29, 1998 said:
以下文章節錄自今日(21.5.98)明報﹕
城巴今年將增聘千人
Article 52:
[廣告] 26M 巴士總站加相
Volvo (S3BL1) (volvo@school.net.hk) at Thu May 21 11:16, 1998 said:
26M 巴士總站內的各項已更新, 其中相片簿內加左 30 幅相,
27 幅九記 (14 幅雞車) , 1 幅中記, 2 幅城記.
請到此一遊.
VOLVO.
Article 53:
可能是唯一一架有大欖隧道廣告的ME
TONY(S3M61) (wclui@vtech.net) at Thu May 21 10:56, 1998 said:
今日筆者去上水巴士廠睇巴士，在廠內見到一架ME(掛75K牌),漆上
大欖隧道廣告(黃色頂加藍色車身果隻),可能是唯一一架ME是有大
欖隧道廣告。
廣告並印上由元朗至各地行車時間(經大欖隧道):
元朗←→荃灣:13分鐘
元朗←→葵涌:15分鐘
元朗←→尖沙咀:24分鐘
元朗←→中環:30分鐘
Article 54:
(AD) Hong Kong Vehicles Network Express
Hanvas 漢 華 (hanvas@netvigator.com) at Thu May 21 05:45, 1998 said:
English Version
( AD ) Hong Kong Vehicles Network Express
The Hong Kong Vehicles Network Express have been opened for eight month.
Now, it has been re-constructed and updated.
There are so many new features in this netsite.
Some parts may have nothings but i will finish it as soon as possible!
Please feel free to visit frequency!
URL=http://www.HKiD.com/people/hanvas/index.html
Chinese Version
【 網 頁 廣 告 】 香 港 汽 車 網 絡 快 線
香 港 汽 車 網 絡 快 線 八 個 月 大 喇 ，
依 家 現 已 重 新 裝 修 及 更 新 ，
並 加 入 了 許 多 部 環 節 ，
雖 然 有 部 分 環 節 未 必 如 期 整 好 ，
但 我 會 盡 快 整 好 !
請 各 位 得 閒 就 黎 睇 下 啦 !
URL=http://www.HKiD.com/people/hanvas/index.html
Article 55:
【綱頁廣告】UNIQUE 260最後更新
Louis (louis@hkabc.net) at Thu May 21 01:13, 1998 said:
UNIQUE 260 已加入三幅新相, 歡迎參觀.
UNIQUE 260
多謝!
Louis
Article 56:
問城記B6
AL118(FF1819) (rainbowg@netvigator.com) at Thu May 21 13:16, 1998 said:
請問B6是否有部份裝捷聯車身呢?
希望有人答到我, 謝謝!
Article 57:
元朗大馬路出現混亂？
Terence (kapun@asiaonline.net) at Thu May 21 12:58, 1998 said:
現在元朗大馬路東行車站如開心廣場門口及嘉麗華酒樓已有
276/276P,64K,968等大線及其他郊區線(54,76K,77K,277)
停站，現在繁忙時間已有車龍及人龍，頗為擠塞。
當26/5大欖隧道通車後，加停64M,68M,68X,269B,269C
全部出市區，豈不是會人車都出現混亂？停站時間會否很長？
註：現在元朗大馬路因有LRT在中間，非常狹窄。
希望各位能解答小弟問題，謝謝。
Article 58:
Re: 不肯定的消息 50,51,52
AL118(FF1819) (rainbowg@netvigator.com) at Thu May 21 14:00, 1998 said:
> Stanley Yung (n281@hkstar.com) said:
> 不 肯 定 的 消 息
>
> 在城記的路線重組中 之 合併組
>
> 5 + 10 = 50
係唔係由堅城去北角?
> 1 + 5A = 51 (即十年前,中巴的提案)
係唔係由堅城去跑馬地上, 有否雙向分段?
> 5B RENUMBER TO 52
路線是否不變?
> 8X + 80 = 80X
是否由中環德輔道中經灣仔道, 禮頓道去小西灣?
> 還有......
>
> 非正途獲得的消息
> 亦非本人的建議
Article 58: (Request 1)
> AL118(FF1819) (rainbowg@netvigator.com) said:
> 5B RENUMBER TO 52
我在原文打錯了
應是 5B + 5C = 52
Article 59:
城記電視廣告
88K (b9505044@ln.edu.hk) at Thu May 21 14:55, 1998 said:
為何城巴不像九巴在電視賣廣告？
我覺得在眾多巴士公司中，
城巴的市場推廣係最好，
如好少全車身廣告。
Article 60:
層城記模型近況
88K (b9505044@ln.edu.hk) at Thu May 21 14:47, 1998 said:
近日出開先達商場，
發現城記 Standard版無曬成兩、三個星期，
老闆('日'利玩具)也不知何時有新貨，
他說下批可能要$390，為何噤快冇貨？
是否有人 hold 貨？
現在我知'發'十M賣緊 $288，己比原本 $250升了
$38元。
有冇人知唔知那仲賣$250呀？ThankS!!!
Article 60: (Request 1)
唔好用造字呀！
你部機睇到 人地睇唔到
Article 61:
E33一問?
小丸子VA51 rt.106 小西灣 (k5959585@hkschool.net) at Thu May 21 15:17, 1998 said:
請問,龍記E33由邊個總站去赤角呢?
Exacuse me!the LWB rt.E33 where the station is
go to the Chep Lap Kok?
小西灣巴士鑒測助理..
VA51 TONG HN8481
(LV97 CM7009)
