19980516




Articles on 16th May, 1998.

Today's Articles': 39.


Articles' NUmbers: (19980516_01-39)





Article 1:

Re: 62X轉全日可行性


金魚 (n960@hkabc.net) at Sat May 16 11:45, 1998 said:


> TONY (wclui@vtech.net) said:


> 九巴計劃把61X及62X行經汀九橋,較原先行荃灣路同葵涌道快好多。


> 本人對62X有一點見解:


>


> 62X係唯一一條由屯門去觀塘、藍田的路線,以往只係上下午時間行


> 走,如果在62X不提供服務之時,由屯門去觀塘就一定要坐巴士出荃


> 灣,然後轉地鐵,對居民實在不便。


> 所以希望62X可以改全日行走,請問又贊唔贊成呢?





62X轉全日?冇客喎,我曾經在九巴流動服務中心提出過,我話尾車


太早開出(平日0930,假日0810)所以九巴就'係甘意'改時間0935


0820,但你們都會看到61X在中段時間是冇客的,所以62X若轉全


日都是冇客的,我覺得大家在提議巴士公司改善服務的時候,也要


體諒一下巴士公司的可行性!





金魚字 GR3915


Article 1: (Request 1)

62X其實有好多客(可能多過61X),班班頂閘,


D車擺o係道唔用又好浪費,應該轉全日.


不如Fax這建議到九巴27450600.


Article 1: (Request 2)

> eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:


>


> D 掛牌車嚮邊度調過黎? D 冷馬去藍田定油塘好呢?


> 油塘夠唔夠擺多條全日線呢? 食飯時閒閒地多三幾架車喎.





我覺得62X若果轉全日,車源和總站空間並不是問題.


車源方面,隨一些路線的取消(68,68A)或轉全冷


(64M,68M,68X,69M,69X),應該可以空


出幾部熱狗給它,而且我相信絕大部分走完62X的熱


狗都會'休息',最多走去攝61X(有錯請指正);總站


空間方面,油塘方面應該可以擺五,六架車.其實,學某位


仁兄講,很多時候都見到62X爆滿,有轉全日的潛質.


不過在非繁忙時間往返觀塘屯門的需求恐怕不樂觀,所


以轉全日的機會相信不大.





另外,根據自己以往乘62X的經驗,有部分乘客是


在油塘工業區上落的,因此它的總站設在油塘是有必要的.


呀!還有,62X非全日有一好處,就是補充61X下午接


近繁忙時間因屯門公路,龍呈祥道擠塞而脫班.





總括來說,主觀上我是希望62X轉全日的,但客觀


上就恐怕短期內不可能罷.








ANDY C.K.NG


Article 1: (Request 3)

> GF1912 (yanho@netvigator.com) said:


>


> 部份熱狗在早上走完62X時,都會插61X牌o係黃大仙載客返屯門,


> 之後就返友愛南車場'休息'。





Two years ago, when I was waiting at Diamond Hill MTR


in Lung Cheung Road, an empty 62X came and started to


take passengers there. It was still displayed as 62X,


and the fare was displayed the same as 62X($9.40 for


62X, $8.20 for 61X that time). I did not get into it


and waited five more minutes until 61X came. The 61X


finally caught 62X in Kwai Chung Road because of the


traffic jam!








ANDY C.K.NG


Article 1: (Request 4)

62x D 車多數是走「兩味」的,...即: 上段---擺廠---下段---擺廠


唔去油塘, 還可去官塘 / 藍田的.





K.W.B.


Article 1: (Request 5)

油塘方面,62x是足夠有位去支持到這條線的車位





-----------------------





62x[孖的]


----------------------


219p


----------------------


14


---------------------


FU6538


Fu6970 致意、


FU8336


Article 2:

Re: 今日明報﹕新巴司機內外全新形象


PTC (bc_cly@stu.ust.hk) at Sat May 16 14:48, 1998 said:


> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:


> 以下文章節錄自今日(16.5.98)明報﹕


>


> 新巴司機內外全新形象





目 前 新 世 界 第 一 巴 士 服 務 有 限 公 司 (新 巴 )的 管 理 層 已 開 始 為 中 巴 員 工 ﹐


設 計 講 座 。 新 巴 企 業 傳 訊 部 助 理 總 經 理 關 則 輝 稱 ﹐ 接 觸 他 們 後 ﹐ 發 覺 員 工 只


視 作 「 搵 食 工 具 」 ﹐ 不 太 尊 重 工 作 ﹐ 欠 缺 服 務 熱 誠 ﹐ 而 自 稱 「 car佬 」 更 有 貶


低 之 意 。








聽講呢個仁兄以前o係中記做公關主任個喎,點解去摑太做o左一輪


又番去服務香港島人民?





PTC


Article 2: (Request 1)

> PTC (bc_cly@stu.ust.hk) said:


> 「


> 目 前 新 世 界 第 一 巴 士 服 務 有 限 公 司 (新 巴 )的 管 理 層 已 開 始 為 中 巴 員 工 ﹐


> 設 計 講 座 。 新 巴 企 業 傳 訊 部 助 理 總 經 理 關 則 輝 稱 ﹐ 接 觸 他 們 後 ﹐ 發 覺 員 工 只


> 視 作 「 搵 食 工 具 」 ﹐ 不 太 尊 重 工 作 ﹐ 欠 缺 服 務 熱 誠 ﹐ 而 自 稱 「 car佬 」 更 有 貶


> 低 之 意 。


> 」


>


> 聽講呢個仁兄以前o係中記做公關主任個喎,點解去摑太做o左一輪


> 又番去服務香港島人民?





他是1991至92年,中巴的公關經理


而當年的人事經理及中巴的秘書


現已被新巴招攬,出任要職


Article 2: (Request 2)

> LA11 Shing (b493332@hkstar.com) said:





> 終於爭取到喇 , 新巴司機唔駛 '' 戴綠帽 '' 喇 ,


> 你知啦 , '' 戴綠帽 '' 意頭非常唔好嘛 .


>


> 真係替新巴司機高興 , 因為佢0地唔駛 '' 戴綠帽 '' .





我聽一位中巴司機講,佢話有人問過新巴載帽問題,新巴話「普通線


唔駃帶,但係機場線就一定要載」





機場線?有玄機......


Article 2: (Request 3)

Why!New world first bus where to have a airport route?





VA-61~~~~~~The Eastern County Magistrate


Article 3:

(Suggest)rt.313 Tsui Chuk to Sheung Wan


VA-61(Magistrate) (kyy690@netvigator.com) at Sat May 16 00:54, 1998 said:


This route can convenient for Tsui Chuk,Chuk Yuen,Tin Ma,Wang Tau


Hom&Lok Fu in the area of inhabitants to use express go to


Central.Because rt.103 go to Central only of bus stop in


Murray road(ICAC headquarters)cannot go to eg.Des Voeux road.





I so suggest establish route:





***********************************************************************


rt.313 Tsui Chuk garden to Sheung Wan





Service timetable:Monday to Saturday


7:30am,7:50am for KMB


7:40am,8:00am for NFB





***except in Sunday & Public Holiday*****





Full fare:$9.40





via:Chui Chuk st.>Wing Chuk st.>Chuk Yuen rd.>Chuk Yuen bus terminus>


Chuk Yuen rd.>Ma Chai Hang rd.>Fung Mo st.>Fu Mei st.>


Wang Tau Hom rd.>Lok Fu bus terminus>Wang tau Hom rd.>Junction rd.>


Waterloo rd.>Princess Margaret rd.>Hong Chong rd.>Cross Harbour tunnel>


Gloucester rd.>Harcount rd.>Cotton Tree Drive overpass>


and Des Voeux road(center).








VA-61~~~~~~The Eastern County Magistrate


Article 3: (Request 1)

翠竹唔行得雙層車喎.





咁313即係要用單層? 用三菱,德仔, 上兩三站即爆, 又駛乜兜完竹園


去樂富呢? 不如一出竹園就唔停站直去香港啦.





黃埔十二甲 字


Article 3: (Request 2)

> DA54 (da54@netteens.net) said:


> 有 103, 唔駛 313 喇.... 兩條線太似啦!





But rt.103 cannot via:Des Voeux rd,so a few passengers need


direct to arrive a destination.Because a lot of passengers


need 趕時間 to go to work.





VA-61~~~~~~The Eastern County Magistrate


Article 3: (Request 3)

你估坐 211 轉地鐵快定坐巴士由何文田塞到隧道口快丫拿?


你估 103 D 客真係中環客多咩? 103 做兩截客架, 一截竹園/樂富去海傍,


一截竹園/何文田/隧道口去半山區.


Article 3: (Request 4)

不過 , 0的103 0係朝早經常 '' 頂閘 '' 喎 , 多條線好


0的0既 , 不過班次早番些少就最好0勒 .





LA11 Shing FF7869


Article 4:

Re: 870......


Alex Chan (alexki@netvigator.com) at Sat May 16 00:57, 1998 said:


> Ivor Fung (ivorfung@hkstar.com) said:


> 城巴站長朋友剛剛打電話黎報料,話870已經出番黎,


> 不過改左fleet no.同車牌,今日仲走182……


>


> 衰就衰在佢唔記得左個新車牌同新fleet no.


>


> 有冇版友可以証實?





不會掛,870好似尚在復修中.....





Alex Chan


Article 4: (Request 1)

> Ivor Fung (ivorfung@hkstar.com) said:


>


> 所以在下咪話請各位証實下咯~~


I see a very new Dennos Dragon in CityOne Shatin


I see 8?0, because I was taking 82X and see this bus


Register number is like HS????


---


Aqua856


Article 4: (Request 2)

But it doesn't mean that it must be 870, right?


Article 4: (Request 3)

> Kevin (z094530@school.net.hk) said:


>


> 係O吾係成個車身換O西,裝番個新車身O尼?


> 生還者Kevin





Maybe...


---


Aqua856


Article 5:

Re: 問六七十年代的26號路線


金魚 (n960@hkabc.net) at Sat May 16 12:36, 1998 said:


> TONY (wclui@vtech.net) said:


>


>


> 請問九巴以前的26號路線是否68號線的前身?同時


> 亦想知道九巴26號線歷史(係指六七十年代的26號),26號以前


> 曾使用過的車款。





我記得RT.26在1973年改為RT.50


好似用過Albion 17(米.davis 的Hong Kong buses volume 2)


有詳細解釋,圖書館有得看的





金魚字GR3915


Article 5: (Request 1)

> GF1912 (yanho@netvigator.com) said:


>


> RT.50前身應該係RT.16。





26好似是51,大角咀碼頭--元朗


Article 5: (Request 2)

當時的 26 是來往 佐敦道碼頭--元朗


經荃錦公路


Article 6:

算唔算杞人憂天?


Claymon (wang5@hknet.com) at Sat May 16 10:25, 1998 said:


今晚終於考最後一科 - 中文(說話能力), 於是小弟又要去西環一趟......





到中環後, 小弟特登等行5C的城蠅, 話都無咁快有部2117來到, 我當然上了車.


車上乘客不多, 都無人企. (雖然下午五點幾......)


到上域多利皇后街, Trident上斜乏力表現又再出現. 唉!





考完後, 我搭了780(ML80)回家.


當ML80使勁地上長命斜時, 突然間想起2117上斜情景. 小弟不禁擔心:





1. 我認為城巴只有Dragon同Man先至有能力上長命斜(指十二米而言),


但計落兩款車都只有約90部.


如果城記不增加後者數量, 而九月80, 780這些長命斜線又被城記接管埋,


以城記車海戰術, 8X, 80, 118同780隨時用70部車.


除非城記撥所有上述車型行長命斜線, 如果唔係, 用Olympian, 甚至Trident,


上斜情況肯定......


(別忘記城記還有619同690這類上斜線)





還有一些板友問過, 但未有完全解釋的問題:


為何九巴十二米Olympian上斜無問題, 但在城記同款車的表現會咁差?


(歡迎本版兩大機械顧問或對機械熟悉者回答)








智叔


MC7 - BV2050


Article 6: (Request 1)

> Claymon (wang5@hknet.com) said:


>


>


> 2. A22都係行Trident, 而A22都要經龍翔道,


> 那麼A22咪變城記觀光旅遊慢線!





A22不經龍翔道,是像14咁得,在佐敦上西九龍快公。





>


>


> (歡迎本版兩大機械顧問或對機械熟悉者回答)


>


>


> 智叔


> MC7 - BV2050





Dennis Lau


Article 6: (Request 2)

對不起, 我記錯了. 估唔到城記一早洞悉先機 :)








智叔


MC7 - BV2050


Article 6: (Request 3)

I don't understand, how can a 305bhp Trident got beaten by a 250bhp Dragon?? If that's a MAN, at 350bhp, sounds reasonable, but a Dragon........


Article 7:

270A & 270X


Gary70X (f97044@uow.edu.au) at Sat May 16 14:04, 1998 said:





> 新來的KSMBH (shumky@netvigator.com) said:


> 隨著粉嶺南及上水區人口增加,對巴士服務的需求也相應增加,


> 所以我建議將270A改為270X,全日行走,詳情如下:


> 270X 嘉福-九龍車站


> 嘉福-置福圍-百和路(一鳴路>華明路>雷鳴路>華明巴


> 士總站>雷鳴路>偉明街)(偉明街 站 樓路-和睦路-聯捷街馬適路-天平路-龍琛路(龍運街>)


> 新運路-掃管埔路-粉嶺公路-新田公路-三號幹線-大欖


> 隧道-汀九橋-西北青衣交匯處-長青公路-青葵公路-西


> 九龍快速公路-東京街-長沙灣道-彌敦道-梳士巴利道-


> 漆咸道南-暢運道(安運道>)九龍車站


> 用3AD,3AV及AV行走,每8-18分一班,停大欖隧道轉車站


> 請給予意見





********************************************************


這過不失為一個好提議,不過如果經大欖出九龍實在太長車程了.


其實張270A改為270X全日行走便可.....車程雖然火車快,但勝在不用多轉車,便可直達九龍中.....





GARY 70x ^_^ (( SMBH if you like to contact me in ICQ welcome no. 4096283))





********************************************************


Article 7: (Request 1)

點解九記不多開設 北區 至 市區 線


估計原因如下:





1.做區內線(短線)比市區線(長線)的盈利好


 且區內線回流快


2.搭火車出市區只須40分鐘,巴士起碼一小時





如果北區的巴士服務開放給其他公司做


新公司必會辦出市區線


如1995年城巴有99由南區去東區(太古城)


以前中巴要你轉車,轉一次車,中巴多了一程錢


且2/20/21/22唔滿客





stanley yung


Article 7: (Request 2)

意見都幾好,因為北區只有70,70X去市區,如果開多條去九龍市區


的巴士路線的話,會方便北區居民。


不過我認為總站應設在機鐵九龍站,因為可以方便去乘機鐵的北


區居民,所以建議路線應該如下:


......青葵公路,支路,葵涌道,長沙灣道,彌敦道,梳士巴利道,


九龍公園徑,廣東道至機鐵九龍站。





※再者嘉褔村步行三四分鐘就去到粉嶺火車站,乘火車去九龍車


站都只係八個字,坐火車都快過坐巴士‧


Article 8:

Re: 九記提前接收中記路線?!


LA11 Shing (b493332@hkstar.com) at Sat May 16 04:16, 1998 said:





> 417 (96006257@plink.cityu.edu.hk) said:


>


> ----------------------------


> | 九KMB |


> | 九巴服務 日日進步 |


> |--------------------------|


> | 西隧快線 往屯門、元朗 |


> |--------------------------|


> | 960 | 961 | 968 |


> ----------------------------


> | To Hong Kong ---> 往香港 |


> ----------------------------


> | 300 | 368 | 369 |


> ----------------------------


> | 373 | 373P | |


> ----------------------------


>


>


> 呢個係小弟前晚坐 5B 時,o係渣記銀行總行前面個站見到o既。


>


> 一個牌兩種站,似唔似黃公司?原來o既站亦已移走,唔知呢個係咪


> 為接收 300 做準備?


>


> --


> 417





西隧線開0既時候 , 九記和黃公司係聯合推廣0既


(意思係幫呢0的路線買廣告) , 唔 ...... 呢個安排嘛 , 不只九記 ,


連黃公司都有0的咁0既 '' 站牌安排 '' .





原本擺0係度0既站牌 , 原本0既設計都有路線300 0係度 ,


如果好似你咁講 , 係為接收路線300 做準備 , 都可以咁


講0既 , 都唔錯得晒 .





不過 , 以我0既看法 , 係九記想俾0的乘客早0的睇0下佢0地


0既 '' 新設計站牌 '' , 況且兩間公司都有自己0既新站牌咯 ,


況且九記舊0個隻站牌 , 一旦有新線要停該站的時候 , 就


要成塊換過晒 , 好不方便 , 新0既站牌好得多 , 貼過塊貼紙


落塊站牌度就得喇 , 而且可以給予乘客新鮮感 .





LA11 Shing FF7869


Article 8: (Request 1)

> Anthony LAM (lsf@hknet.com) said:


>


> 請問九巴係咪會轉新站牌??





我諗剩係o係香港島至係咁咋?將來九龍同新界可能都用新有蓋車站


取締(?)波板糖,未必會用哂西隧站牌o既.


你知九記冇可能o係人地地頭起自己車站啦.





PTC


Article 9:

Re: Before you post an article 貼文前......


eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) at Sat May 16 16:13, 1998 said:


Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:


> Every time before you post an article here on HKBDB,


> how would you ensure the accuracy of the information


> included in your articles?


> 請問各位板友在每次貼文前,是怎樣確定閣下所得的消息的準確性的呢﹖





我自己呢, 若果係報料的話, 通常都係嚮街度貼左通告, 或者熱線有資料先會


貼出黎o既, 當然仲要睇下有冇人一早貼左啦! 所有口頭報料, 「聽聞」報料,


巴士司機談話內容, 一律都唔會信.





為左確保文章/資料真確性, 唔該唔好係人講乜都貼上黎啦, 放流料會累左好多人架.


Article 10:

68X/68M第日慢過而家?!


wp12a (gw7112li@netvigator.com) at Sat May 16 16:02, 1998 said:


小弟預言68X/68M改行三號幹線之後, 行車時間仲長過而家行屯門公路!


因為時間都o徙晒響塞元朗博愛交匯處.





但係68X/68MD車到時會cut少幾架, 湊湊埋埋o黎開269B同269C全日


(預期行車時間縮短, 少D車可保持原有班次喎). 咁即係話行三號幹


線o既巴士將會大大脫班? 而愈快o既線(例如269B/968), 愈短o既線(例如64M),


死得愈慘...





點解?





請先睇拙文


三號幹道通, 元朗大塞車!


同覆文


三號幹道通, 元朗大塞車!





可能事實會比想像中更嚴重! 大欖隧道o既車同環迴公路o既車都要入博愛迴旋處!





呢個得兩線行車o既博愛迴旋處要負荷


三號幹線 + 環迴公路


o既流量!





舊時凹頭迴旋處得三線行車都已經塞到氣咳, 又要整燈位又要搭鐵橋, 咁


先至唔駛點塞. 第日封埋凹頭迴旋處, 上水同大欖隧道o的車一齊迫入博


愛迴旋處, 你話會塞到乜o野程度? 呢度仲要係只此一途, 冇第二條路揀!





除非改行錦田公路直去元朗墟啦, 咁至避得開個迴旋處, 但係呢邊又得單


線行車, 咁即係話...又係個樽頸. 連54/64K/276/276P都不能倖免,


真可惜...





而家元朗/天水圍居民聽到屯公塞車仲可以揀276P/276去上水轉火車,


第日一律要經博愛迴旋處去上水/九龍/香港, 萬一o個處塞死o左, 即


係無路可走?





咁第日D大隧巴士若果一出隧道就見到龍尾, 會唔會早個路口落


高埔村出錦田公路去元朗?





祝元朗/天水圍居民好運!


黃埔十二甲 字


Article 10: (Request 1)

巴士就話一定要跟足路線行o者, 私家車貨櫃車見塞車可以見錦田路,


由錦上路個路口上大欖隧道架嘛....D 司機唔會咁死板, 明知塞車仲走去排隊o者?


Article 11:

Re: 大家有冇見過89年中記罷駛前在車廂的window標貼?


Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Sat May 16 13:41, 1998 said:


> 小丸子VA51 RT.106 小西灣 (k5959585@hkschool.net) said:


> 在89年,當時我得9歲,在中記罷駛前數日,在中記


> 的巴士window上,不論LV,DS,LX,LF,XF,ML,MB和


> 其他中記車隊的window上,貼一張紙,好似係寫上


> 對中記高層不滿的字句,究竟當年中記罷駛前夕在


> 巴士window貼上what字句呢?





其中一句是﹕‘工作二十年,只得二萬餘。’


(請其他板友繼續。)


Article 12:

Re: A Question?


eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) at Sat May 16 11:03, 1998 said:


Tony Fan (o07@netteens.net) said:


> Is 68A,68X will go to Tai Lam Tunnel?





1. 68A 取消; 68X 經.


2. 請 不 要 私 自 加 / 減 在 文 章 內 的 > 符 號


Article 13:

Re: 巴士風化案?


DA74(780) (c3035083@hkstar.com) at Sat May 16 12:44, 1998 said:


> Jacky Tsang (lbjackyt@polyu.edu.hk) said:


> 頭先坐104返工, 在隧道口落車時, 見外線泊了一架110(寶, LF262)


> 上層車尾站著一名女子(二十餘歲), 而一名男子(二十餘歲)則在懇求


> 著該名女子, 女子的臀部有污漬, 有兩隧道公司職員在車上


>


> 警察隨後而至, 分別觀察最後排及尾二行的椅背...


>


> 另一方面, 由於後一班為九記車, 其他受影響的乘客須轉車, 但該九


> 記師傅落車要求中記師傅在其更紙上寫上一些東西, 其實該中記師傅


> 寫咩呢?





I think the CMB driver was writing the no. of passengers


,in order easy to make KMB get the fare from CMB.


Article 14:

Re: [廣告] The Bus Homepage


Ronald (ronald_to@laser.zeronet.org.hk) at Sat May 16 01:36, 1998 said:


> Edward Hong (edhong@netvigator.com) said:


> My homepage have update: Bus Gallery ~ Dennis Trident into New Era


> Welcome to my homepage,


> my homepage address: http://home.netvigator.com/~edhong


> or http://www.hkid.com/people/edhong


> Thank you to visit my homepage.


>


Very High tech.


Have some feels like a software/computer company's homepage.





I think it may be the best design for overall buspage in HK...





Ronald


Article 15:

Re: 一個問題


Claymon (wang5@hknet.com) at Sat May 16 01:04, 1998 said:


> 東邪 (GK9112) (mingyin@hkstar.com) said:


> - 小弟對屯門元朗線唔多熟悉,想請問遲些屯門元朗o既巴士路線


> 變動會係點?有咩新線?有咩舊線會取消或重組?謝謝!





試試在此處找找.





Jess, 似乎你的網頁要多加宣傳.








又幫人賣廣告o既智叔


MC7 - BV2050


Article 16:

ME1


Mike NG(LF126) (ngmike@hkstar.com) at Sat May 16 09:44, 1998 said:





今朝在下o係雞寮大坑渠外同ME1喜相逢, 佢當時行70X. 大驗之後果然


零舍唔同, 成架靚仔晒之餘仲唔多覺佢嘈.





請問各位師兄/ 姐, 佢係唔係準備長掛70X呢?








仍未[目訓]醒o既


雞寮(南)小村民 Mike NG(LF126)


(BL50 -- DC2270),


o係寫字樓


Article 17:

今天CHEM 卷


Kaipan (markkp@school.net.hk) at Sat May 16 13:10, 1998 said:


4. On a hot summer day, the engine of a moving bus suddenly caught fire.


When the firemen arrived, they use foam, instead of water, to put out


the fire. After the fire was extinguished, the firemen sprayed a lot of


water onto the hot engine.





Discuss the conditions required for the fire to occur and explain the


underlying principles of the actions taken by the firemen.








(9 MARKS)


3 of the marks will be awarded for effective communication.








香港巴士新聞組板主 Kaipan


Article 18:

Route Magazine


Dennis Lau (ss78k@netteens.net) at Sat May 16 14:03, 1998 said:


Route雜已加入A70路線資料,不過我不知準確與否!如有錯處,


請email給我。





歡迎參觀





Dennis Lau


Article 19:

1989年中記罷駛最令市民影響的區域:


小丸子VA51 RT.106 小西灣 (k5959585@hkschool.net) at Sat May 16 15:27, 1998 said:


89年中記罷駛最令市民影響地區:





半山區線:





rt.1,3,11,11A,12,12A,12M,13,15,19,23,23A,23B,25,


25M,26,27





南區線:





rt.4,6,6A,7,9,37,38,40,40M,41,42,45,47,48,61,63,70,


70M,71,72,72A,73,75,76,77,78,79M,90,91,92,93,95,96,


97,97A,98,107,170,260,262[107,170:當時市民只可搭九記過九龍


和新界]





東區線:[柴區]





rt.8,80,81,81A,81M,82,82A,83,84,85,87,88M,106,606,780


781


[106:當時市民只可搭九記,冇了以上的線,市民唯一搭地鼠


MTR出入,但剛剛入伙的小西灣就市民要步行出去:]





西區線:


rt.5,5A,5B,10,101,104,105,113


[101,104,105,113:當時市民只可搭九記,但該區有多d紅跑巴


和叮 叮tram,西至東行影響不算大,即是rt.2,20果d一樣:





但最影得最大區域:





旭和道,香港仔華富,赤柱,石澳,舂坎角,寶馬山道,域多利道








VA51 TONG HN8481


(LV97 CM7009)


Article 20:

Tin Chi Estate.


S3BL390 (s967817@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) at Sat May 16 17:01, 1998 said:


I have seen about 7 AV and 2 3AD in Tin Chi Estate,I think


they are test on 63X and 63M.





S3BL390 ^_^


Article 21:

九巴新車牌


金魚 (n960@hkabc.net) at Sat May 16 17:21, 1998 said:


各位板友:





九巴富豪11米空調出到453.





而我也有AV427-453車牌和底盤編號.





如要的話,E-MAIL 往 往n960@hkabc.net





金魚字 GR3915


Article 22:

Article: The History of Perth Buses


Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Sat May 16 03:13, 1998 said:


The following article was written by the chairman of Transperth in 1990:





(Text by Stuart Hicks, the chairman of Transperth in 1990)





Transperth's bus fleet at the beginning of 1990 numbered 899 buses which travelled 46,674,050 kilometres during the year.





In the past, Transperth has operated a fleet which was older than most of its counterparts interstate.





Transperth is now pursuing a major bus replacement programme.





The change to a new corporate trading identity in August 1986 began the progressive installation of new livery on each bus as it became due for routine re-painting. By June 1988, almost 40 per-cent of the bus fleet carried the new livery. All remaining buses are expected to wear the new colours by 1991.





By Act of Parliament, private bus companies were united into a single public transport entity in 1958. The amalgamation ended the parlous state of Perth's private bus operators at that time.





Private bus company fleets, large and small became the basis of the new Metropolitan Transport Trust fleet.





The new organisation, a government instrumentality administered by a Trust Board, moved quickly to rid itself of many older inefficient buses which had come into the fleet. These vehicles were replaced with the Leyland Worldmaster and AEC Mark VI.





Leyland buses, essentially Worldmaster, Cub, Panther and Leopard models made up the Perth fleet during the 1960's.





Hino buses appeared in 1970 and between 1970 and 1975, 127 of this manufacture had their bodies built locally and were brought into service.





In 1975, Mercedes' award winning O.305 bus was brought into the fleet when a contract for the supply of 65 of this model was let.





Mercedes supplied 18 of the articulated O.305G model in 1979 to replace the railcars which had provided the temporarily closed Perth - Fremantle rail service.





Leyland B21 buses also came into the fleet during 1979 and 1985.





Several Mercedes O.305 models were converted to operate on LPG and CNG fuel from 1980.





From 1985, when Transperth's fleet modernisation began rigid Renault PR100-2, PR180-2 articulated buses, rigid Mercedes O.305/O.405, O.405 and articulated O.305G buses have entered service.





MAN SG292H articulated buses entered service during 1988.





The first articulated bus to be used by Transperth was a MAN SG192. This bus was brought into the fleet in 1977 and continues to operate today.





Another single model still in service is a Scania BR112H. This bus was built in 1981 brought into the fleet during that year and continues its service.





The policy of each Trust Board has been to purchase chassis from ovrseas companies in the absence of a chassis manufacturer in Australia. The bodies have been built in Western Australia.





The body builders who have contracted to build Transperth bus bodies are Howard Porter, Campbell and Mannix, Nixon, Motor Body Builders, Freighters, Highquip and Boltons.





All these firms have built all or part of various contracts for bus bodies. The Transperth Kensington Street Workshops have also built the bodies of some buses.





A feature of the buses in Perth public transport service has always been the quality of locally produced coachwork.


Article 23:

Suggestion of KCRC.


S3BL390 (s967817@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) at Sat May 16 17:47, 1998 said:


I think the KCRC can buy some 10.6 m trident to


replace tne metrobus.


Two advantage:


1.Provide the air-cond. service.


2.Increase the passenger to take the KCRC bus.





S3BL390 >_<


Article 24:

【 哥 仔 】 模 型 報 價


Hanvas 漢 華 (hanvas@netvigator.com) at Sat May 16 18:10, 1998 said:


【 哥 仔 】 模 型 報 價 : ( 五 月 十 六 日 )


                  ( 太 子 及 西 港 城 模 型 舖 )





43201 $780. KMB Volvo Olympian 12m ( Standard Livery )


43202 $350. KCRC Leyland Olympian 11m ( 10th Anniversary Livery )


43203 $492. KMB Volvo Olympian 12m ( Contra Vision of 97 advertisement )


43204 $398. CTB Volvo Olympian 12m ( Unification Celebrations )


43205 $280. CTB Volvo Olympian 12m ( Standard Livery )


43206 $388. CMB Volvo Olympian 11m ( Standard Livery )


43207 $297. KMB Dennis Dragon 12m ( Unification Celebrations )


43208 $297. LWB Volvo Olympian 12m ( Standard Livery )


43210 $585. CMB Volvo Olympian 11m ( Unification Celebrations )


43215 $268. KMB Volvo Olympian 11m ( Year of the Tiger 1998 )


Article 25:

Re: The Most Valuable Photo 最珍貴的相片


Colin Chang (kalim@netvigator.com) at Sat May 16 21:03, 1998 said:


> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:


> In your point of view, which bus photo(s) would you consider to be the most valuable one in your collection? Why?


> 你個人認為,在你自己所影過的相片之中,最珍貴的相片是哪一張/些﹖為什麼﹖





淺藍色時o既LA7行40M,攝於華北。





原因:1)40M唔係成日有冷氣車行,2)LA7 呢個顏色唔係用o左好耐


3) LA7當時原來係行111o既,臨時俾人抽o左去行537同40M,相信只


此一次而已(指仲係淺藍色o既LA7)。


Article 25: (Request 1)

3BL1 / 3N3 / S3BL174 run 680


3BL1 / 3M2 / 3N1 run 48x





Since I waited for them for long long time !!


Article 25: (Request 2)

我就係呢幅:











因為當日朝早無意中望窗, 見到呢架野響西九龍 D11 路出現,


再用望遠鏡睇到佢行緊 917, 於是就即刻落樓等佢回程, 坐到


佢兼影埋相, 咁o岩又突然好天 (原先比較多雲), 影左好多幅相.





那天是九七年十二月十八日, 是 2200 的第一天投入服務, 聽說


只行了一個上午 917, 下晝就已經去左 969 喇.





--


車匙!


Article 25: (Request 3)

> eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:


> 當然係全部已取消o既路線啦, 搵都搵唔番架喇.





中巴削o左o的線啦~ 仲有而家退o左役既車啦~


而我都有張影得幾好既城巴2100試車相~~








你仲可以做Wallpaper添~ 入呢度啦!


.....


T.P.T.


Article 25: (Request 4)

當 然 仲 有 係 已 退 役 ( 湯 埋 ) 既 巴 士 相 !


Article 25: (Request 5)

首 選 梗 係 Neoplan Megashuttle 試 車 相 啦 ! 網 上 獨 有 嘛 ! :P


My choice is the day of the road test of Neoplan Megashuttle !


The only homepage have these series of photo ! :P








我 個 網 頁 下 個 禮 拜 更 新 喇 !


Article 25: (Request 6)

NLB Dennis Dart. I used lots of time to wait for it!





S3BL390 66m


Article 26:

Re: 巴士徽章問題


Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) at Sat May 16 20:43, 1998 said:


> T L (awongtl@ihug.co.nz) said:


> 我想請問巴士的徽章是跟巴士來的,還是巴士公司另外要俾錢買呢? 因為以OLYMPIAN


> 為例,大部份的九巴都沒有車頭VOLVO的徽章,但城巴就大部份都有,到底點解呢?中巴


> 就更加利害,任何VOLVO OLYMPIAN徽章都唔會在其巴士車身中出現,它連九巴車尾有


> 的VOLVO徽章加上OLYMPIAN都沒有,但反而CONDOR就有喎,有冇人知點解?





巴士公司決定唔嵌上車囉.


Article 26: (Request 1)

冇乜好晒o者, 又唔係巴士公司o既標誌.


裝o左後, 翻油, 上廣告時又要就住o黎油, 仲麻煩.





--


車匙!


Article 26: (Request 2)

仲有, 遇到長毛這種人時, 貼一個冇一個, 不如唔好貼!


Article 27:

Corgi KCRC model bus (222)


William (William.Lau@xtra.co.nz) at Sat May 16 18:23, 1998 said:


How many version does KCRC Olympian model bus have?


Is the model bus have 10th anniversary livery only? How about standard livery? If so, then what is total amount of production?


Article 27: (Request 1)

> Benjamin (patben@netvigator.com) said:


>


> How about standard livery? If so, then what is total amount of production?


>


> The total amount of standard livery is 4000





On the other hand, the limitation for the 10th anniversary livery is 6,500.


Article 27: (Request 2)

As far as i know there are 2, including the one carrying the standard livery.





I run a homepage on HK models, please hava look la:


http://www.users.fl.net.au/~iwong/model.html


Article 28:

Re: 93A 冇熱狗0既問題 .


LA11 Shing (b493332@hkstar.com) at Sat May 16 21:14, 1998 said:





> AV89 (ngpt@netvigator.com) said:


> 請 問 中巴81A,93,93A開到幾時?


> 81a幾時到炮台山道底?


> 81A兜半山, 點解行車時間仲快過81呢?


>


> 93A有熱狗價, 但冇熱狗; 而25m,504,507,590冇熱狗價卻行熱狗,


> 是何道理?





93A 是由301 0既 DA45 , LA11 0係未走301之前行走0既 , 而且


只係開兩班 ( 07:00 , 07:15 ) , 所以咪冇 '' 熱狗 '' 囉 .





有份走93A 0既


LA11 Shing


Article 28: (Request 1)

507...fO..o


Did you mean 537?


From the recent CMB fare table (Dec 1997),


there is hot dog price of


590, $4.0 for whole journey.


Article 29:

Re: (我阿爸話)屯公有巴士著火


金魚 (n960@hkabc.net) at Sat May 16 20:59, 1998 said:


> HE7489 (shuhang@netvigator.com) said:


> 小弟今日食梗晚飯o個陣時,我阿爸話:


> '我今日行過屯門公路,咁岩塞車,跟住見到一架黃色o既巴士


> (即係冇A/C o既九巴),後尾著火呀!'


> 由於小弟的父親唔多識巴士,所以佢講唔出o個架係乜野型號。


>


> 請問各位網友有冇聽過哩單事件呢?





全中,1330,一部66號S3N346 GA665(59X掛牌)於掃管笏因車頭


水箱過熱著火,消防員到場處理,連拖車大約一個鐘





金魚字 GR3915


Article 30:

轉載:AD廣告


Walter Kwong (walter@school.net.hk) at Sat May 16 19:37, 1998 said:


From hk.interest.bus


Walter wrote :





今日見到部AD上左三號幹線路線廣告


包括所有途經三號幹線路線!





(車是行59X,係G字頭)





想問那句口號是甚麼?


Article 30: (Request 1)

> Walter Kwong (walter@school.net.hk) said:


> 想問那句口號是甚麼?








大欖隧道線 直線轉車任你選











要型容這句口號,始終離不開老土核突這四個字~_~

















eriC


Article 31:

寓言故事﹕今日170有九記雞呀﹗


Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Sat May 16 18:52, 1998 said:


(以下故事純屬虛構。如有雷同,實屬巧合﹗)





話說在九八年四月的某一日,在沙田火車站巴士總站和華富(中)的170總站,分別聚


集了大批手持相機的巴士迷。他們不約而同地從某網頁收到消息,指當日有九記雞


在170出現。故此他們就決定在總站徹夜守候。可是過了整天,他們看到的,就只有


一部又一部的冷馬。





有一位巴士迷心有不甘。於是在第二日,他就向一位170的字軌司機查詢﹕





巴士迷﹕‘昨天是不是有九記雞在170出現呢﹖’





司機﹕‘九記雞﹖你是否在指九記雞檔所賣的雞呢﹖’





巴士迷﹕‘九記雞檔﹖﹗’





司機﹕‘是啊﹗昨天九記雞檔有大減價嘛﹗很多乘客買完了雞以後,都坐170回家的﹗


有一個買了雞的巴士迷,還說要在回家以後,在一個網上討論區把這個消息發放出


去呢﹗’





那個巴士迷當場欲哭無淚。





(這個故事的寓意何在,請各位想一想。亦歡迎各位板友發表對這個故事的意見。)


Article 31: (Request 1)

DA54 (da54@netteens.net) said:


> 你是否想說﹕ 板友信唔過?


>


> 你好像不大喜歡別人在此放料喎.....





唔係唔喜歡, 而係放料又唔講來源, 信你又驚老點, 唔信你又有少少蝕底.





幫下忙, 寫埋嚮邊度聽到料, 見到料唔係好辛苦o者?





(老實講, 呢度有某幾位板友以前老點得人太多, 而家放o既料我已經完全唔信)


Article 31: (Request 2)

> eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:


>


> 唔係唔喜歡, 而係放料又唔講來源, 信你又驚老點, 唔信你又有少少蝕底.


>


> 幫下忙, 寫埋嚮邊度聽到料, 見到料唔係好辛苦o者?


>


> (老實講, 呢度有某幾位板友以前老點得人太多, 而家放o既料我已經完全唔信)





I think it's all about those idiots who loves to see people running around for buses, which they think it's funny. Then at night they post stuff on HKBDB that no such and such buses were seen and it was stupid to go and that guy who spread false informations is laughing at home.....


Article 32:

Re: 文通意外一則


金魚 (n960@hkabc.net) at Sat May 16 21:02, 1998 said:


> GW3430 (id00574@netvigator.com) said:


> 頭先看新聞, 兩架空調九巴於中午在油麻地中僑(南行)相撞, 路線分


> 別為104及42A, 42A車頭嚴重損毀, 104車尾ENGINE亦撞'立'. 車牌不


> 詳.


>


> 請問各位有否知道詳情.





兩部都是富豪,42A那部是GW5498 3AV121





金魚字 GR3915


Article 33:

Re: 屯門公路變大埔道


F-stephen (c462a198@netvigator.com) at Sat May 16 19:20, 1998 said:


> 巴士兵 (97480358@plink.cityu.edu.hk) said:


> 如題


>


> 屯門公路不收費,而大纜隧道要收三四十元,我認為情形就好像沙田大埔道及獅隧,城隧 遲些市民覺得屯門交通方便些又大量買車,最後屯門公路又塞過.....!


> 所以大纜隧道的通車對屯公的流量可能幫助不大 而乘巴士也要用那麼多時間





有西鐵嘛!不過這個一定是事實,因為香港是永遠不會有一條原本十分


吃香的公路,變為永遠荒涼的公路,包括大埔道與青山道,以前曾有人


說獅隧,吐露港公路及屯門公路落成,會令它荒廢.但事實非如此:





青山公路


沿線(尤其汀九,麗城,黃金海岸及深井段)都會塞車,令


政府不惜擴建





大埔公路


如你所說,沙田嶺段都多車(又是要擴闊),中文大學一帶雖少塞車,


但大埔滘山一段住它需要它





所以,政府都好像說過,大欖隧道十數年後必會飽和,搭巴士當年會遇


塞車,屯門公路亦會塞車(欖隧與西鐵延長此情況出現時間)








註:本人將會於七月前推出'屯門公路二十年專輯'網頁,回顧屯公廿年


史,未來展望及動向發展(包括欖隧與西鐵通車後的影響),請留意!





>


> 另外,你們認為60x 61x 961 等線行車時間會否減少?





行汀九橋,我覺得比行荃灣路為佳


(政府大力宣傳車主改行汀九橋可見一斑)





F-stephen


Article 34:

(廣告)E31 on the Net


Flying Chuk (chuk@netvigator.com) at Sat May 16 18:46, 1998 said:


E31 on the Net的車輛特寫加入了


Leyland Victory MK2及


Long Win Dennis Trident,


歡迎參觀





http://home.netvigator.com/~chuk





飛機竺


Article 35:

Models site of HK transport!!


Isaac (iwong@fl.net.au) at Sat May 16 18:58, 1998 said:


Please hava look at my site adn find out about HK models la! Thanks





http://www.users.fl.net.au/~iwong/model.html


Article 36:

不正常的聲響:


AV89 (ngpt@netvigator.com) at Sat May 16 21:08, 1998 said:


若大家看見ME??/DG319/百佳廣告, 請留意佢的聲音!


又是一個嘈到唔知似乜又唔入廠的佳作!


Article 37:

Wrong Fleet No. II


AV89 (ngpt@netvigator.com) at Sat May 16 21:06, 1998 said:


3AV161-->AV161


AL27-->AV27


Article 38:

今日牛河


AL118(FF1819) (rainbowg@netvigator.com) at Sat May 16 21:32, 1998 said:


今日得閒無事出o左街!





首先坐地龍去觀塘, 之後坐17號(BL)去愛民, 等車o既時候見到296A條龍由站頭排到去裕民坊街尾(即麥記門外), 上o左愛民之後行路落


o左尖沙咀, 再坐地龍去太子, 上o左新世紀入油, 之後坐穿梭巴士(冠忠三菱Van)去李鄭屋, 之後轉o左架冠忠大三菱(捷聯車身)去黃埔, 車上居然有大眾文化城o既職員派優惠Coupon, 跟住坐架冠忠亞洲車身o既Isuzu LT133L(HP牌)去九龍城盛德街轉架3B鴨車上慈雲山中心, 跟住, 嘩, 慈雲山中心居然用Cherry Holidays o既Benz O328做穿梭巴士, 我梗係即刻跳上車, 嘩, 正呀, 有可調校到大約150度


o既高背絲絨座椅, 閱讀燈, 架車去到彩霞村總站, 我就去o左德褔坐雅高顛佬(Hino)去觀塘, 架車就好殘, 但少有好乾淨, 我o向曉麗苑落車行落雞寮, 本來想坐我自己出九龍城, 但好可惜俾架AV393替o左, 之後o向翠櫻樓外坐o左架冠忠捷聯車身三菱去坑口, 再轉架冠忠Isuzu JALMT112去藍田, 出到藍田之後, 居然見到蘋果日報用陽光Toyota做穿梭巴士, 但係我就坐地龍去o左九龍灣, 跑上彩霞, 期望再坐O328落慈雲山, 但係架車已經換o左做20座o既Toyota Coaster, 但架車都有可調校式座椅. 而同線另一架車就換o左架DZ牌, 屬於MACH o既O303, 配台灣車身. 上番慈雲山之後, 去七記買o左串魚蛋同一包檸茶, 之後再坐另一架 O328去土瓜灣, 呢架車仲正, 可能因為機管局租用, 呢架車上o左Airport Link顏色, 係藍色的. 仲有呢架車座椅o的絲絨花式係同城巴o的雙門Dart/B6一模一樣, 連天花板都係同一隻絲絨, 我幾乎o向架車上[目訓]著, 因為實在太舒服了. 最後我坐116(3AV9)回家.





諗番起, 今日只係用o左以下o甘多錢去遊車河:


地龍--------$3.9x1+$2.3x2=$8.5(用發達窿)


3B----------$3.2


116---------$8.9(用發達窿)


即共$20.6, 但已經遊遍整個九龍半島!





我想問問, 嶼巴架O328會唔會行普通路線o架, 如會, 邊一條呢?


希望有板友能解答我的問題, 謝謝!


Article 39:

問九巴車牌!


金魚 (n960@hkabc.net) at Sat May 16 21:46, 1998 said:


本人現在將車牌打落EXCEL的時候,發現以下編號的車牌唔知有冇錯


現向各位板友查詢..





1)3AV55 GN7841


2)AM67 EV2661


3)AM72 EV2861


4)AM103 EV9853


5)AM169 GJ2756


6)AM174 GJ2456





各位請幫手查有冇錯,錯左請提出!唔該各位





金魚字 GR3915