Today's Articles: 64.
Articles' Numbers: (19990119_01-64)
Article 1:
可能係破產之兆
Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) from 208.151.81.165 at Mon Jan 18 18:19, 1999 said:
> 奧黏P人 (hwc718@netvigator.com) said:
> 大家對呢件事點睇?
唔知咁樣會唔會係城巴主席徐x堂破產之兆呢？
不過如果Stagecoach收購Citybus，肯定會改名喇，但係唔知
會唔會改現有城巴既標誌、車身顏色呢？
希望Stagecoach入主城巴後，會改善服務就好喇，尢其是關注城巴
座位問題同車廂空調過冷問題。
Article 1: (Request 1)
> 9807 (autobus@globility.com) said:
> 想問，如果一個人破產的話，他三年內的交易都會再用黎作抵債呢？
> 呢個就係最重要問題啦。
> 如果係徐生要破產，而城巴又係佢本人的話，咁StageCoach咪凍過水？
> 請一些識多0的法例的板友答下啊，唔該。
如果城巴o的股票賣晒俾捷達, 城巴仲點會係徐先生的呢?
Article 1: (Request 2)
> Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 唔知咁樣會唔會係城巴主席徐x堂破產之兆呢？
唔會掛，因為早前曾經有報導話如果Stagecoach真係買起
城巴之後，個條數夠亞徐生還錢兼有突架播。
> 不過如果Stagecoach收購Citybus，肯定會改名喇，但係唔知
> 會唔會改現有城巴既標誌、車身顏色呢？
未必喇，事關你翻油咁大批車始終需要時間，兼且貼番個
Stagecoach嘜頭咪算囉。
> 希望Stagecoach入主城巴後，會改善服務就好喇，尢其是關注城巴
> 座位問題同車廂空調過冷問題。
哈哈！照計Stagecoach都會諗到架喇 :)
Article 1: (Request 3)
> Gakei! (gakei@netvigator.com) said:
> 慢慢來, 唔駛急, 最緊要快 (←我公司同事間流傳的廢話:P)
咁究竟係『慢慢o黎、唔駛急』定『最緊要快』呀？？^_^!
不過我估換色換logo都係其次，最重要都係『士地高廚』
執返好城記D車，唔好成日擺街……
> 最弊當年捷達o的車o的凳都係絲絨o番,
> 我諗問題係歐洲人唔知絲絨唔多適合亞熱帶地區呀.
但係好話唔好聽，唔通佢一句『我係歐州人，唔知絲絨
唔o岩亞熱帶』就不停咁俾『吸濕大笨象』我o地坐咩！
知錯要改嘛！
（話時話，新巴幾時至肯唔再入絲絨呀？1009家下都已
經開始唔掂喇！）
P.S.我反而有興趣知道顏氏仲會唔會涉足運輸界……^_^
已經冷戰了一星期，好凍……
LX253V_V
Article 1: (Request 4)
> Gakei! (gakei@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 最弊當年捷達o的車o的凳都係絲絨o番,
> 我諗問題係歐洲人唔知絲絨唔多適合亞熱帶地區呀.
除香港外,新加坡亦都有絲絨凳的巴士?
新加坡仲熱過香港,究竟新加坡的巴士點保養d絲絨凳呢?
VA-61
Article 1: (Request 5)
> 璁巴 (miketal@hkstar.com) said:
> 可能叫Stagecoach Hk呢!(~講笑):P
跟據英國Stagecoach的慣常做法，被收購後的城巴，英文應叫
Stagecoach Citybus。而大食鬼也會被Stagecoach的Logo所取代。
由於黃色的城巴車身式樣太深入民心，故相信不會更改。一如
FirstGroup收購英國Sheffield的Mainline一樣。
米特蘭主線
Article 1: (Request 6)
頭先(17:45)睇ATV財經新聞先知城巴俾Stagecoach收購，而報導亦指出城巴負債達12億元，但資產只得11億元。好彩Stagecoach肯收購城巴，否則城巴分分鐘要清盤!
另外，城巴505-510號車(505-510原為Stagecoach巴士)會唔會成為最先一批披上Stagecoach車身o既巴士呢?
Article 1: (Request 7)
> STA Renault 3303 (dccheng@acs.itd.uts.edu.au) said:
>
> Probably not, since Lyndon is a British and Stagecoach is
> British. I believe they will let him manage Citybus.
>
不如我提醒一點,某老牌巴士家族有些股份.
你會唔會留個叛徒在你間公司.
Article 1: (Request 8)
> William Fung (hk711997@netvigator.com) said:
> 請問顏某有幾多％股份呢? 輪唔輪到佢話事呢~?
會唔會一陣買車又「保守」起來呢? : p
HKBT 被明報介紹而家好開心既.....
T.P.T.
Article 1: (Request 9)
> LF291 (wang5@hknet.com) said:
> 都唔到佢唔保守, 依家都應該夠車用掛.
夠有突啦, 不過我諗捷達首要工作就係換o左2??/3??/7??
o的勁臭座位, 改返用中記既乳膠位就最好!
> 好啊! 巴士網頁界又一見報作 ^_^
當我見到篇新聞我都覺得好意外囉 : p
同埋仲有介紹HKBEC個畫廊/昔日中巴/藍方旗/IBX巴士小說/
新巴官方網頁/九巴官方網頁....
.....
T.P.T.
Article 1: (Request 10)
> Jacky Tsang (lbjackyt@polyu.edu.hk) said:
>
> 又話時話, 捷達又會唔會跟返以前咁講
> '雙層巴用十二年, 單層巴用六年(定八年)呢? :P
我諗一日有李Ｘ新o係度，個政策都唔會有變，除非未來大老闆話抄o左
佢（係就好囉）。
Article 1: (Request 11)
唔知幾時又會輪到我個網呢？
(講笑咋!我唔敢車望有朝一日會有傳媒報導)
Article 2:
87救亡行動
Jess (c5013830@hkbu.edu.hk) from 158.182.2.142 at Tue Jan 19 07:49, 1999 said:
> chiuchiu (chunglai@hkstar.com) said:
> 樓下見告示有簡x年議員反對99/4取消87
>
> Is is ture?
> 應否取消87呢!!
>
> CHiuChiu
九巴每隔一年就幫87唸計仔, 但全被否決, 包括:
1. 取消87, 延長87A至瀝源(不入市中心), 72加分段.
2. 與87A合併,即類似現在E42於市中心行法.
3. 轉全單層冷氣, 加密至十五分鐘一班.
4. 直頭取消87, 唔改其他.
頭三個就前幾年陸續被否決, 看看第四個建議的下場......
Jess
Article 2: (Request 1)
Jess suggested the following to reform 87 series:
我又提出一個反建議:
87 火炭火車站-大角咀 (20分鐘一班, 逢00/20/40開)
經: 禾輋,瀝源,市中心,大圍市,繞入美松苑,大圍火車站,紅梅谷道.
But I think this is far too long!! No need to lengthen to Fo Tan!!
87A 圓洲角-佐敦道碼頭(取消87X) (8-15分鐘一班)
經: 第一城,富豪花園,河畔花園,沙角/乙明/博康/獅隧公路...經彌
敦道,佐敦道往佐敦道碼頭.
No comment
87B 新田圍-大角咀 (7-10分鐘一班)
路線不變. 早繁時往大角咀方向不入顯徑/田心
It is not good as current 87B is far too curcuitous. So it is necessary to change the routing so it goes via Lion Rock Tunnel Road, San Tin Wai to Hin King.
87P 美松苑->大角咀 (10分鐘一班)
經: 海福花園,駕駛學院,顯徑,田心......
全部路線收費:
普通 空調
$4.2 $5.0 沙田/大圍-市區
$3.5 $4.0 過獅隧後
Good, as fare is lowered.
291/291A Siu
Article 2: (Request 2)
1. 取消87, 延長87A至瀝源(不入市中心), 72加分段.(87-88年)
2. 與87A合併,即類似現在E42於市中心行法.(89-90年)
3. 轉全單層冷氣, 加密至十五分鐘一班.(92-93年)
4. 直頭取消87, 唔改其他.(98-99年)
仲有一個
96-97年
九巴曾建議將80M/87/280P合併為87
來往 尖沙咀<->穗禾苑
經油尖旺/亞皆老街/窩打老道
可能要瀝源村重建九巴才可重組/取消87
Article 2: (Request 3)
咁又要問下閣下...
瀝源點去亞皆老街??
新填地街點去瀝源??
汝洲街點去瀝源??
(以上都是87主要客源)
你唔好話俾我聽, 要班耆英走去彌敦道搭81...
雖然平時87好少人, 但繁忙時間及星期六日也不太少人....
87 仍有其用處, 反而係81 搶走87 D客!
87 真係好差咩? 真係冇用咩? 點解個個都想佢死??
永遠支持87系既 HB 916!
Article 2: (Request 4)
> 瀝源點去亞皆老街??
72
> 新填地街點去瀝源??
72
> 汝洲街點去瀝源??
72/86
Article 2: (Request 5)
價錢如何? 72/86 都貴過87
而且由瀝源(呂明才) 0個個站行番入瀝源村, 仲唔行死D 耆英?
HB 916
Article 2: (Request 6)
佢梗係反對啦，唔係點爭取民意參選下次選舉呀，呢D舉動好多議員都識架，尤其o係選舉前!
Article 2: (Request 7)
> AV340--進 (eeckc98@alumni.ust.hk) said:
>
> 完全應該，因為呢條線實在超級少人坐。
>
> --HM3044
But when I take it last Saturday
~2:15p.m at Sa Tin KCR Station (to TKT )
it is quite a lot of people
~50 passangers
But surely it is only a few people take this route
when the other time
~11:30 a.m (From TKT to LY )
only about ~20 passangers
From Mark(^_^)
Article 2: (Request 8)
> DL (ss78k@netteens.net) said:
>
>
> 超級少人 is not equal to 冇人坐(at least 10)！
> 所以未必摺得
轉俾綠小做得唔得?
>
> DL
Article 2: (Request 9)
I agree that rt.87 should change to minibus route and increase frequency
DL
Article 2: (Request 10)
> Jeffrey (cwhkwh@school.net.hk) said:
>
> 有一樣0野我諗一定唔會真,
> 就係橫額話87取消'影響每日二千多乘客冇車搭',
> 似乎係誇大0左, 或者統計方法唔可靠.
>
> 87最密0既時候,班次係25分鐘,
> 當佢20分鐘一班, 一個鐘頭三班車,
> 朝六晚十二共十八個鐘, 最多總共54班車.
> 如果一日有二千人次搭87 0既話,
> 咁每班車就大概有38人次,
> 但係87即使係繁忙時間,都好似冇一架40人喎!
>
> 況且,實際上亦唔係冇車搭,
> 81及86已覆蓋0左 87 0既服務範圍,
> 若87取消, 乘客係可以改搭81或86 0既
> 犧牲0左0既客其實剩係果d來往瀝源/禾輋/市中心同筆架山0既客,
> 相信呢d客0既數目應該冇二千人次.
>
> 不過,若真係取消87 0既話,可考慮實行以下措施:
> 1)81往佐敦道方向途經瀝源總站;
> 2)增設72由禾輋往奧運站0既分段收費
>
>
> 其實可考慮將之改為只走上下午繁忙時間0既路線,假日停開 或
> 改為全空調, 用三菱, 加密班次
>
> Jeffrey
其實,我覺得各位的提議都不錯.無錯,72,81同86都可以覆蓋87所行經的路線,
不過,取消87,一定要有其他路線配合,例如86要改經龍翔道,服務畢架山
花園及澤安;72要加密班次;81要係禾輋街設站或繞經瀝源總站(其實不會阻太
多時間);另外,85,88K也可以替代87服務瀝源到大圍的乘客.
Article 2: (Request 11)
I prefer setting station at Wo Che Street rather than
diverting via Lek Yuen Bus Terminius. Oher suggestions are
good, too. However, 72 and 74A must add a sectional fare:
72 Wo Che to Olympic Station $4.2
74A Tai Chung Kiu Road to Kwun Kong Ferry $4.2
Article 2: (Request 12)
> Sixty (wong5399@netvigator.com) said:
> 我認為這些方法皆不錯,但問題是要一班長者接受新服務,
> 因87客源大部份都是年長人仕!!!
>
如果那些瀝源村長者歸晒天，87的生存價值有幾多？
(大吉利是)
其實，87可以用低地台車！
DK1367
Article 2: (Request 13)
is there use flettine oir 'longcow' in 87 before?
Article 2: (Request 14)
> Albion (PSKY) (h9714900@hkusua.hku.hk) said:
> No need. Cause瀝源與禾輋相距不遠.
> Agree.費是被人話'Man-eating'.(不過720既收費確是'man-eating')
In the meeting of Traffic and Transport Committee of Sha Tin Provisional
District Board held on 19.1.1999, the rep. from KMB has submitted the Route
Development proposal of Sha Tin District 1999/2000. KMB suggested the
cancellation of Route 87 due to low level of passengers. KMB proposed to strengthen
Route 87A by introducing additional 1 double-decker bus. Also, KMB has informed the
members that if members accepted the proposal, KMB would introduce a transfer service
between the communters of Route 88K and Route 87A. The proposal is: KMB would
introduce Octopus system on Route 87A. A transfer stop will be provided at the bus
stop at Hung Mui Kuk Road near Sun Chui Estate (Kowloon bound) and Tin Sum Village (Sha Tin
bound). Passenger using Octopus Card can enjoy a discount when trnsfer between 87A and 88K.
However, there will be no discount for passengers paying cash. Passenger from Lek Yuen to
Tai Kok Tsui, for example, would take 88K to the bus stop at Hung Mui Kuk Road near
Sun Chui Estate and change for 87A. KMB will strengthen 88K by adding 1 addational bus.
The representative of KMB said that this transfer is regarded as a pilot scheme of transfer
service on the routes other than Shing Mun and Tai Lam Tunnel Routes.
The comment from members is objection. They dissatisfied KMB the cutting off of 87 which
inconvenienced the residents of Lek Yuen Estate and Town Centre. Members counter-suggested
that if KMB did really not want to run 87, the Transport Department should open the
route for Maxicab service or for open tendering for other franchised bus companies.
HL NG
Article 3:
Re: 南區機場線胎死腹中
傑仔 RLX1 (chowack@netvigator.com) from 205.252.144.9 at Tue Jan 19 03:32, 1999 said:
> 巴士文 (daraman@netvigator.com) said:
> 今日食晏時睇報紙(唔記得明定星島)，話混吉署已經否決了在港島，
> 另開兩條往機場的新巴士線，只容許城巴在港島東及新巴在港島南，
> 各開辦一條接駁中環機鐵站的M線，及准許龍運在粉嶺試辦一條新線
> 往機場。混吉署解釋因本港在長遠計而言，會以鐵路作為集體運輸的
> 主力，巴士只是扮演著接駁的角色云云！
> 今次混吉的處理手法，真的有點問題！
> 首先自從A12拉去柴灣後，整個港島東都已有機場巴士服務，城巴亦不
> 必開辦往機鐵站的M線了。但南區呢？只批准M590由海怡往中環機鐵(
> 相信爬山行居多)，換言之南區居民有幸出門，若要坐集體運輸的話，
> 最好坐M轉機鐵，不怕煩的可轉東涌線(再轉S)或轉城巴的A線，總之冇
> 一程車往機場，除非打的！實情十分可悲呀！將軍澳在將來也會有地鐵
> 網絡，可是南區在可見的將來也不會有集運系統呀！我的意見是並不要
> 求每區也有車往機場，只是南區居民實在有此需要！怕冇客的，可試辦
> 六個月，或一小時一班車也好！混吉的官員，到底有甚麼數據或理據說
> 南區沒客往機場呢？
> 海怡、西/東村、香港仔、黃竹坑、華貴/富、置富、薄扶林一帶的居
> 民，大大話話都有四、五十萬人，難道他們就要被迫坐昂貴車資的機
> 場廢鐵？好冇癮呀！
其實政府以鐵路運輸為主道0既政策，係鐵一般的事實。
鐵路比巴士0既好處，係容量大、車程快、同埋鐵路係同一般路面
隔離，即係較少受其它道路使用者影響。
長遠而言，巴士係會用以補貼鐵路0既不足、連接鐵路未能覆蓋的
地方、同埋做地鐵接駁。
試辦路線？講就易，做就好難啦！開線0個陣個個拍晒手話好，到
你試夠啦，蝕到飛起都好啦，你話區議會會唔會話0甘易俾你 cut
呀？
大嶼山公司試過0架啦，某條 N 線開頭同 TD 講話係試半年0架咋，
到0左半年啦，區議會一句話唔准 cut，侷住繼續做落去！
其實又真係呀，係唔係區區每日都有成千上萬人到機場呀？
E/ A 線又係唔係條條迫爆車呢？點解區區0的人都喊住話要機場車
呢？到爭到又係唔係好多人搭呢？
其實0係南區，都好多車出香港站呀，華富有 4 號、置富有 37A、
石排灣有 7 號、香港仔有 43X, 70 號、鴨利洲有 90, 91, 94,
97, 590 號，黃竹坑有 71 號 ......
出到中環，搭 E11 又得、搭 TCL 轉 S 線、或者搭 AEL 直達....
另外，其實政府係稔過0係南區起輕鐵0架，不過呢度係講巴士0既，
0甘就唔再詳細講啦，你試0下查規劃處0既資料啦！
鐵路運輸為主道係一個不容改變0既事實0黎0架啦......
傑仔 RLX1
Article 3: (Request 1)
> eriC (dart@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 恐怕呢條 M590 同 21 變 M21 個case冇分別!
> 由交易廣場拉去香港站, 再加個 M 字.
>
> 乜香港站重有位咩?
>
>
> eriC
改91做M91啦
仲有，M21同M91隔住開咪得囉
Article 3: (Request 2)
1. 其實是否每區都需要開機場/東涌線, 我看長遠是需要的, 但需要
當東涌有二三十萬人居住以後, 而非現在.
2. 政府早於六六年已計劃過興建南區地鐵線(有少少離題):
華富-田灣-香港仔-黃竹坑-跑馬地(跟現有香港仔隧道)
之後再於八十年代改為一重鐵(灣仔北-金鐘-田灣-鴨利洲西-鴨利洲東)
及架空輕鐵(華富-華貴-田灣-香港仔-黃竹坑-海洋公園)
但因屯門輕鐵的教訓而暫時擱置,估計今年份報告書又會舊事重提.
3. 開兩條M線咪即係叫是但兩條線繞入機鐵站, 你認為政府仍會俾
開新線入中環麼?
Jess
Article 3: (Request 3)
> B-3353 (dickson2@macau.ctm.net) said:
> 如果想快一些到機場/東涌的話, 可以搭 970在西隧口轉 A/E 線.
> 但可惜的是現在 970無低底台巴士行走, 而且現有的 Trident 難
> 以行走 970彎多的路線.
>
> B-3353
10.6米TRIDENTS咪得o羅.新巴都諗住訂購o架o拉.
Article 3: (Request 4)
迪臣兄所言甚是, 不過若然有行李o係手又係冇計...
Article 3: (Request 5)
用咁細架車行970？係都11.3米啦
Article 4:
Re: K1X & K2X
S3M224 (remusmok@asiaonline.cityu.edu.hk) from 144.214.160.201 at Tue Jan 19 03:10, 1999 said:
> 59X (leungmlw@hk.super.net) said:
> 以上兩條線是否轉了全日服務???
>
> 59x
K1X係全日服務
K2X就得早晚繁忙時間先有
Article 4: (Request 1)
> 屯兵 (chungtm@netteens.net) said:
>
> 你是否碼頭區居民?
> 如是,怎會不知呢?
Hello, Mr TM Soldier. Yes i live in TM Pier region but i have
never tried these 2 routes before. I usually take LRT if i go
to Yuen Long or Tin Shui Wai.
But why it is allowed for K1X to operate whole day long but
not K2X? These 2 routes are operated by KCR, right? So does it
mean that they (LRT/bus) are competitors?
59X (who lives in TM Pier region but dunno much about K1X & K2X)
Article 4: (Request 2)
> 金魚 (n960@hkabc.net) said:
>
>
> 據我同輕鐵公關部查詢,原來K2X是因為彌補LRT 720因唔去屯
> 碼而改左去友愛而開辦的,但係因為K2X行的路線,在新開辦時已
> 同當時64M,69M,69X重疊,故只開繁忙時間
>
> 註K2X新開時是不經友愛村同安定村,而是在皇珠路直去屯門市中心
>
> 屯門19年居民金魚字
> 金日金句:奧林匹克,上斜唔得
Thanks for your info, Mr Goldfish. In that case, they should now
allow K2X to serve whole day too as 64M(?)/69M/69X now do not cross
Tuen Mun anymore. Agree?
59X
Article 4: (Request 3)
K1X係行全日.
K2X係行上下午,假日停開.
但係K1X同K2X一開線已經係噤!
Article 4: (Request 4)
好似K1X轉左全日
K2X剩係行上下晝
Article 5:
Re: 贊不贊成GORGI應出香港巴士的模型工程車?請投票!
Mark (s976677@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) from 202.40.137.110 at Tue Jan 19 16:01, 1999 said:
> CMB (carlocwm@hkstar.com) said:
> 目前,只有CORGI出合過約十款英國巴士工程車, AEC ,GUY ,
> LEYLAND'sTower Wagon & Breakdown Truck.都是limited edition , about 4600 to 5000. 市面貨源少,約束$165 $225.香港巴士也出了幾十款,是不是應出香港的巴士工程車?! My first choice : 新巴工程鋸樹車(也應出中巴版) ! 請投票! 如何向CORGI建議 ?
It is a great idea ! I very agree !
I think you may dial the telephone to CORGI H.K Ltd.
But I have forgetten it
You may dial 1083 to get it.
P.S When will Corgi start
the Corgi Collector Club in Hong Kong?
Because there is a lot of Corgi Collector Club in the world
(about 10) ,but still no one in Hong Kong!!!!!!
From Mark
Article 5: (Request 1)
> Kasshober Setra (stage@netvigator.com) said:
>
> Of course yes!!!
是不是應請巴士迷會向Gorgi游說一下, 這個市場可不少 ! Bus fans 熱切期待新車種的出現 ! 老是出差不多款式 , 已快失去新鮮感!我也覺得應出中巴超級古典工程車S15--DE7913 , Guy Arab Mk V, the tree cutter conversion !司機訓練車也可出,一定大受歡迎!
Article 5: (Request 2)
> Maruko NWFB VA54 (k5959585@hkschool.net) said:
>
>
>
>
> 我也覺得Crogi應出Leyland Victory MK2 model!
>
>
>
>
> VA54 HN8897
早前不是有網友說會出雞車--Leyland Victory Mk ll ! 我也在等Gorgi 何時出, 如何跟Gorgi建議?我相信出5000也不夠!
Article 5: (Request 3)
It should be spelt as
CORGI not GORGI
Article 5: (Request 4)
Gorgi & EFE 應多出澳門巴士模型 , eg. Mercedes Benz
Plaxton Beaver 2 , 雙門Dart仔 & Leyland Titan PD ,
Bristol Lodekka , Daimler CVG6 ,
Article 6:
舊相 + 廣告
GZ5818 (kytse1@netvigator.com) from 208.139.117.92 at Mon Jan 18 23:07, 1999 said:
Sorry! 標題為 : 懷舊相 + 廣告
知唔知呢度係邊?
(答案可到 70X 網頁看)
70X 網頁由 18/1/1999 起, 加入大量相片 ,
如 : 懷舊相 , 70X 3AV GC2488 , 70 老虎頭 , 73 雞 ,
中巴 13 MC , 73K 熱狗 ES3678 ,....
歡迎參觀!
70X 網頁
GZ5818
Article 6: (Request 1)
那處應為在葵芳村對面舊樓向左右影出去. 時間約為87年初(那26座
問題公屋於85年尾出事, 連調遷及拆樓約需一年, 故應是86年尾至
87年初)
Jess
Article 6: (Request 2)
> 輝仔 (c5124176@comp.polyu.edu.hk) said:
>
> 塊爛地係咪今日的新都會廣場呢?
係 葵 涌 廣 場 .
另 : 張 相 係 幾 時 影 架 ?
Article 6: (Request 3)
約 86-88 年(我爸爸影)
GZ5818
Article 6: (Request 4)
葵芳地鐵站
Article 6: (Request 5)
唔 知 會 唔 會 係 葵 芳 地 鐵 站 呢 ?
Article 7:
Re: I have a suggestion
Ken Fung (kenf@hkstar.com) from 202.60.253.146 at Mon Jan 18 19:42, 1999 said:
> BLMCSS F.2A Bus Fans (lmc02138@lmc.hkcampus.net) said:
> Can Mr.Ken Fung, not to show our ip address out in HKBDB when we post message here?
> Because I think that it is very very bad to do like that. Just like I write my ID card number on
> the street. Can Ken Fung cancel this. Only you can see our ip
> addresses, is it possible?
It's very useful to keep track who is who and in case that
account hacked by somebody.
Just an IP, not your ID, why do you care about this?
Ken
Article 7: (Request 1)
> Sad HR1969 (si439741@icard.hkstar.com) said:
> I think ID in HKBDB is better than to use ip
The Email address is already a very good ID.
Ken
Article 8:
Re: [致板主]有關某人專 cut 九巴線既建議
機神 (chanyui@ctimail.com) from 203.80.123.221 at Tue Jan 19 18:11, 1999 said:
> Walter Kwong (h9816113@hkusua.hku.hk) said:
> 有沒有問題呢？
> 他的建議我覺得好似開玩笑咁架喎
>
> 明明條 KMB X 線大部份客響 A 地點上車，佢就開條 Citybus 20X 但
> 永遠不經 A 地點，唔知話佢無知定白痴....
>
> 佢既建議嚴重傷害各九巴迷，而提議又了無新意，淨係將 KMB X 線變為
> Citybus 20X
>
> 請板主正視一下
>
> 唔該晒！
有時佢D野好抵死...咩Electric Fare Collection(唔係Collecting咩?) System, 用Volvo B4L, 又勁多分段.重有樣最厲害的是.....勁串錯字!!
Article 8: (Request 1)
I argee with you! Most ( but not all ) of his route
suggestions are non-meaningful and impractical. I think he
is wasting the board's resources. I don't think it is wrong
to admire or even crazy for a bus company, but I think he
is suggesting something really unacceptable, not only to KMB
fans but also to other neutral boardmates. I personally
consider his suggestions and messages as joking.
What the others think?
Darren
a UST student but will not support UST student without good
reason.
Article 8: (Request 2)
因為呢位哥仔, 令我再冇興趣去睇路線建議欄... 不過這可能只係
我既問題, 不知甚樣欣賞他所謂的best passage?!
Article 9:
去到的超連結
NWFB1010 (bonopun@chevalier.net) from 202.77.3.119 at Tue Jan 19 17:25, 1999 said:
> 璁巴集團 (miketal@hkstar.com) said:
> 
東提專車相
Article 9: (Request 1)
> Tarry (hktsui@netvigator.com) said:
> 看不到啊~~
梗係啦! '.html' 又點 view 到出o黎o者
Article 10:
Re: 關x輝自爆新巴宣傳技倆?
DC10 (s986380@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) from 137.189.4.7 at Tue Jan 19 13:47, 1999 said:
> 2500 (willychg@netvigator.com) said:
> 關x輝云:巴士都可以有性格
> 節錄自apple daily 財經板!!
>
> 按此 file好大架 有心等下la
> 似自己讚自己多d :p
>
> 2500
> mkcheng
又唔係要鬧人或關先生的名字唔出得街,點解要用X字做人名？
Article 10: (Request 1)
板規規定.
---
本月金句：獨沽一味，做好自己
Article 10: (Request 2)
> VA-61 (kyy690@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 我相信關先生亦都同我地係巴士迷,如果唔係佢都唔會辭
> 左國泰份工啦,好耐之前佢都做過中記公關部啦,聽說佢細個鐘意
> 牛巴士河.
>
> VA-61
我都同意你的想法，看他咁照顧我們這班巴士迷的需要就知啦！
Bruce
Article 11:
Re: 問車
Ian (97227063d@polyu.edu.hk) from 203.80.97.221 at Tue Jan 19 00:51, 1999 said:
> NWFB1010 (bonopun@chevalier.net) said:
> 請問有邊部AV上了尚德廣場的廣告呢
>
> 明天生日的NWFB1010
有兩架AV,
HM 2681 (sorry, 不清楚這車車牌) 行 296A
HT3220 行 296D
Article 11: (Request 1)
這裡有資料/相
Article 11: (Request 2)
> Hanvas 漢 華 (hanvas@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 冇 記 錯 就 係 一 部 HT 牌 既 AV ， 行 296A .....
296D : HT3200
有錯請指正.
HB 916
Article 12:
Re: ●特別佈告●今日傍晚o係土瓜灣見到VA62
輝仔 (c5124176@comp.polyu.edu.hk) from 202.85.58.30 at Mon Jan 18 20:50, 1999 said:
> 藍田站長 (jackie01@hknet.com) said:
> 今晚大約4:50,o係土瓜灣道見到中巴VA62.
>
> 當時架車由貴州街轉出土瓜灣道,向舊啟德機場方向行駛.
> 當時車上並無乘客,而個司機則著住一件類似前中巴款式o既藍色T恤.
佢o岩o岩o係土瓜灣驗車場驗完車嘛!
佢仲未有紅綠牌(客運營業証), 唔知幾時有呢?
> 特別佈告完畢.
> HKBDB特別新聞報導員藍田站長(GB2444,FX8032)
Article 12: (Request 1)
> 2500 (willychg@netvigator.com) said:
>
> hahaha下午5:20見va62己有紅牌(客運營業証)了
> va62己有la!紅牌客運營業証了!!
我一點幾見到佢, 之後出街, 兩部車今日土驗可能係(手羅)紅牌.
>
> 2500
> mkcheng
Article 12: (Request 2)
架va62 同va64 分別在5:20及於5:30pm用東廊駛回柴灣.
2500
mkcheng
Article 13:
新巴車站又出新招 (19 號)
Ken Fung (kenf@hkstar.com) from 202.60.253.146 at Mon Jan 18 17:51, 1999 said:
今日響藍塘道既 19 號車站度見到 19 號大 label 下面有
另一張大貼紙, 白底紫字, 寫住: '頻密低地台巴士班次
經銅鑼灣往筲箕灣'. 連同班 dart 仔車頭都放左一張牌
話 '經: 銅鑼灣', 睇黎新巴都幾著重 19 號喎. ^_^
Ken
Article 14:
Re: 幾個關於巴士o既世界紀錄
9807 (autobus@globility.com) from 142.194.244.164 at Tue Jan 19 21:12, 1999 said:
> Colin Chang (kchang@mail.usyd.edu.au) said:
> 以下資料來自健力士世界紀錄大全1997
>
> 世界最大巴士公司
> 唔係九巴，係巴西聖保羅市巴士公司，有單層巴士11,282部
但係佢國營架嗎。
小弟整係見過佢0的Leyland National的相，0的巴士好難看的。
>
> 世界單程行車時間最長巴士路線
> 巴西利馬 - 亞根廷首都布宜諾斯亞里斯，全程214小時(包括中途
> 停站時間)
時間計就係，但係計路程的長度的話，係Greyhound Canada的
多倫多--溫哥華路線，全長六千一百公里左右。
行五日就完啦！
因為New York--San Francisco個條係中途轉左車，所以咪唔算囉。
而巴西個條，小弟記得里數冇咁長架。
巴西0的路咁唔好，都想到係點樣啦。
而最長的火車線係Oriental Express，巴黎--中國
同埋，城市巴士又有另一個表架，村長試下搵另一本書啦，
以前係九巴369行頭的，無論行車里數同預計時間都係。
>
> 世界最長巴士：
> DAF Supper City Train, buses of Zaire(無提及形號，應該是
> 為Republic of Zaire度身訂做的巴士)掛接式巴士，全長32.2米
> ，重28噸，第一節座位140，企位110，第二節座位60，企位40。
個架電車黎架。行一條直路去的。
相信小弟都睇過村長睇個本書囉，個本書唔錯架。
Article 14: (Request 1)
> Gakei! (gakei@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 九巴屯門總修中心好像是全球最大的巴士維修廠.
應該係，但o果本書竟然無講！奇！
Article 14: (Request 2)
can this bus turn left road and right???
Article 15:
疑問一個
2500 (willychg@netvigator.com) from 208.139.123.2 at Tue Jan 19 20:17, 1999 said:
> Gakei! (gakei@netvigator.com) said:
> 
>
*純屬虛構*
> --
> 車匙!
幾靚喎! :P
BUT
我比較想知道其實捷達有否公佈到被收購之城巴
真是要改名嗎?
2500
MKCheng
Article 15: (Request 1)
> Colin Chang (kchang@mail.usyd.edu.au) said:
> 照佢響英國收購其他公司o既傳統，會叫Stagecoach Ctybus囉，
> 而且大部分都改用三色間(香港會唔會例外就唔知)。
報章稱改名只要政府同意便可.
Article 16:
Re: 點解買咁多富豪?
VA48 (mirage13@netvigator.com) from 208.167.247.117 at Tue Jan 19 21:19, 1999 said:
> 機神 (chanyui@ctimail.com) said:
> 本戈認為Volvo Olympian好廢....特別在上山的時候(可能已經被n架Dragon過!)
>就算行吐露港都.......唉......係得個靚仔.....點解D巴士公司重買咁多???真不
>明白...係唔係因為平呢?
What the olym when going up the hill very slow?!
Try the CTB 6xx D10A ZF gearbox olym ah.I think that
you will not say olym is slow any more
VA48
Article 16: (Request 1)
> DC10 (s986380@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) said:
>
> 梗係啦！Olympian 平 Dragon 好多,所以......
> 但係Trident無Dragon 咁貴,所以巴士公司近排買多左Trident
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dragon貴過Trident?
Article 16: (Request 2)
睇來位板友係俾Dennis的官方報價單欺騙了. 有人題過新巴買
Trident二百萬一部, 而報紙賣舊年年初三反部870賣240萬.
D記者大概係搵官方資料, 當然同實際落單時個價有出入啦!
Article 16: (Request 3)
首先, 唔該下次於適當位置開新行, 一行過好難睇.
其實Olympian都有好處o架, 例如行車穩定, 車廂寧靜 (與Dragon相比).
行吐露港廢係部份鎖o左o既AV/3AV遮, 坐下舊AV啦, 幾爽o架.
至於你話靚仔......係指個底盤靚仔? 如果Dragon用亞歷山大殼咪又係同
Olympian一樣樣, 冇話靚仔唔靚仔o既.
Article 16: (Request 4)
龍的避震, 係今時今日, 可以話係垃圾中o既垃圾! 唔信, 試o下
坐o下603, 係東廊o個段好似騎馬噤.
再玩激o的? 坐215X啦, 上次我坐, 係啟福道天橋, 架o野凳到好似
散噤. 個車佬仲一於有理無理, 死dum難dum, 結果有個細路仔尖叫,
佢先至收歛o下.
唔想過海咩? 都得, 坐8X啦, 118都得架. 再唔係96都唔錯.
如果係短陣, 架車付磅輕o的, 拋得仲凌厲! 試o下91 入[大清水],
或者61 入[大淺水]都得. 最後醒多條市區版俾大家: 917ADS騎術
訓練過西隧---爽`快`正!
係我眼中, 龍只係一部後置引擎雞, 冷龍就係後置引擎雞加番部分體式!
無錯, 龍的確有佢o既優點. 好似上斜食力, 起步快(當然係同Olympian
比啦, 唔通同Dart仔比咩!) 同埋價錢平(註:龍係平過Olympian).
不過上斜食力又有乜用? 係香港, 試問有邊條路靜係龍行到而Olympian
行唔到? 我靜係數到: 炮台山道, 藍塘道, 香港仔水塘道. 數埋又
有幾多條線行呢o的路呢?
大家可能會話, 龍上斜食力, 起步快, 就算條路Olympian行到，
行龍o既行車時間肯定快過Olympian. 好喇, 快又快得幾多呢?
三分鐘， 五分鍾， 十分鐘好未呀？ 凳到副骨頭都散晒， 換o黎
一個只係夠沖杯麵o既時間， 我就覺得唔值喇！
又琳o下o丫, 點解明明龍平過Olympian, 香港眾巴士公司都買Olympain
多過買龍呢? SBS又點解一架龍都唔買? 係英國， Olympian比Dominator
多出數倍， 噤又點解呢? 點解Stagecoach o黎香港, 買Olympian都唔
買龍?
我覺得如果Olympian行得到o既， 都係行Olympian 好． 所以，
對於城巴Olympian行40, 同新巴Olympian行23, 我係舉腳贊成o既.
至於Condor, 我就連題都唔想題. 俾我揀, 我情願坐Fleetline行970.
FatfishZ
Article 16: (Request 5)
但唔知點解, 在Dominator 6X2家族中, 3N的避震係零舍正的. (中
巴DL都冇咁好)
無論1A, 42行太子道界限街, 6C行彌敦道, 表現都一流.
我自己會覺得坐巴士咁耐, 都係3N最定. 各位又點睇?
Article 16: (Request 6)
GF,GD,GE 挪批會否好些?
Article 17:
Re: 我今日可能係同LV6相聚的最後一天
VA48 (mirage13@netvigator.com) from 208.167.246.234 at Tue Jan 19 18:10, 1999 said:
> 前中巴8號線太守VA51 (parnell@cyberec.com) said:
> 話說頭先放學搭84(LV6)回家,一路上都好正常(途中見到有10xx行84M,
> DSxx在長命斜跪低),點知......
>
> 架車上到長命斜頂,就車頭冒白煙,原來係架車的水用晒.於是乘客們都焦躁
> 不安,因為84號線班次與83號係全柴灣區最......的.但係最後架車去到筲
> 箕灣馬會度停下來(唔係跪低),我都落了車轉85號走了......
>
> 我最在意他們(乘客)話:'哈哈!呢架車一入廠就出唔返黎囉!'我真係好怕架
> 車從此就......我唔係好想搭他的最後一程......哇哇~
>
> 結果我只得望實架LV6,自己黯然離去......
>
> 真係好想有部時光機的
> 前中巴8號線太守VA51
At about 4pm today LV108 on rt84.I was playing football
with my classmate then LV108 was climbing up the hill
then the bus's engine noise is become very weak then the
bus stopped and can't move anymore.
VA48
Article 17: (Request 1)
可以轉新巴其他線車播, 上次壞車轉到 106 (都係睇好唔好彩)
84 都唔算疏既(通常唔過三個字), 83 班次就好似海鮮價...
唔會掛, 無水咁少事. 尋日 DS11 上午跪左, 下午已經攪掂
以前每逢行去柴灣地鐵站, 都唔知點解成日撞到 LV6 行 81
LV24, LV29 都行返 81, 希望 LV6 都返來 81 啦!
柴灣人智叔
Article 17: (Request 2)
我放學(16:20)返屋企時見到架84號在上址停左係度...
唔知係咪佢呢?
(我仲見到有很多人圍住架車添!)
只是無水罷了,唔會湯咁嚴重掛!
係喎,點解叮叮大富翁無時光機?
Article 17: (Request 3)
以前用LV6做代表車的
DL13-EF7027
Article 18:
Re: 星島日報(19.1.99)﹕英集團斥23億全購城巴
50% Sad HR1969 (si439741@icard.hkstar.com) from 202.82.40.2 at Tue Jan 19 18:16, 1999 said:
> Dennis Law (elawcy@alpha7.curtin.edu.au) said:
> 以下文章是節錄自今日(19.1.99)星島日報﹕
>
> 英集團斥23億全購城巴
Is Stagecoach = the one which open 801/2R?
Promise myself to give up. Never to find him again
HR1969 (Partly Sad Version)
Article 18: (Request 1)
英 資 23 億 收 購 城 巴
北 海 套 現 八 億 元 徐 展 堂 家 族 紓 困 (摘自蘋果日報)
Article 18: (Request 2)
Oriental Daily
Article 19:
Re: 有冇人知點解kmb唔用kmb.com.hk ??
DC10 (s986380@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) from 137.189.4.7 at Tue Jan 19 13:44, 1999 said:
> anthony lam (siufung2@netvigator.com) said:
> 頭先去aright hosting, 發現原來www.kmb.com.hk是九巴所有的,
> 咁點解九巴唔用, 有冇人知??
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> domain: kmb.com.hk
> descr: The Kowloon Motor Bus Co.(1933) Ltd.
> descr: 15/Fl, No.1, Po Lun Street, Lai Chi Kok, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
> descr: HK
> admin-c: TLEE2680-HK
> tech-c: CKWO2184-HK
> zone-c: CKWO2184-HK
> nserver: ns1.hk.linkage.net
> nserver: ns2.hk.linkage.net
> changed: lunglung@wyvern.hk.linkage.net 951213
> source: HKNIC
點樣同去邊度睇ARIGHT HOSTING?
我記得曾經有段時間去www.kmb.com.hk係見到九巴寫住Under Construction架
不過現在就乜都無
Article 19: (Request 1)
I remember that someone ask this question a long time ago (1997), someone said that kmb use this domain to send e-mails with @kmb.com.hk
Promise myself to give up. Never to find him again
HR1969 (Partly Sad Version)
Article 19: (Request 2)
用唔係唔得, 家陣已經好似佢D 車咁快, 再放埋嘩嘩嘩,
等全世界都走入去睇既話, 咪好似怡和街咁暢通...
明神 YAHIKO
Article 20:
九巴91,91M和92的派車一問
Peter(1) (ykfong@vtech.net) from 202.77.248.51 at Tue Jan 19 01:14, 1999 said:
91M所有的N車己由BL取代,係幾時轉的.
想問一問,91M的熱狗和冷馬的字軌車?
而91和92仍用N車為熱狗車,想問一問,熱狗和冷馬的字軌車是什麼?
Article 20: (Request 1)
> R Lai (raymansc@asiaonline.net) said:
>
> 91M於12月4日可以用八仔, 但之前一日己經轉晒
> 最慘就係上星期開始換入大量女司機, 冷熱都有.
> what's matter of using female bus captain>??
> 由於現在大學放假中, 所以暫時91M不會有11米車及特車
Article 20: (Request 2)
Sorry I think you are wrong.
Though it is now the semester break of HKUST, but some
students have to attend industrial training in UST. So there
are still special departures both in the morning and evening.
But this time the morning departure use a BL from rt.11K
instead of rt.29M. And the evening special departure use a
BL from rt.29M instead of 11M buses from rt.92.
This is what I observed last week when I attended the
training.
Article 21:
吹水對話一篇
輝仔 (c5124176@comp.polyu.edu.hk) from 202.85.58.42 at Tue Jan 19 01:20, 1999 said:
1/19/1999 00:15 Fai 輝仔 嗨!
1/19/1999 00:16 Kevin Wong Hi~~~ :)
1/19/1999 00:17 Fai 輝仔 城巴易手了
1/19/1999 00:17 Kevin Wong 知道喇, 都傳左好耐lu
1/19/1999 00:18 Fai 輝仔 唔知會有乜改變?
1/19/1999 00:18 Kevin Wong 505-510打回原形!?
1/19/1999 00:19 Fai 輝仔 我呀媽都話城巴管理唔好,
唔知在stagecoach手上會唔會有新景象?
1/19/1999 00:20 Fai 輝仔 很有趣, 頭先睇完冇線講城巴.
估唔到一個小小的香港島, 竟可容納兩間英國大公司First &
StageCoach
龍爭虎鬥, 而且兩間公司都係回歸後先登陸香港.
有趣! 有趣!
1/19/1999 00:21 Kevin Wong 用佢地係英國o既方法, 用超平價黎打低對手, 再收購埋佢!?
1/19/1999 00:21 Fai 輝仔 唔計以前stagecoach搞過村巴
1/19/1999 00:22 Kevin Wong 而家咪有好多條村巴線囉 ^_^
1/19/1999 00:23 Fai 輝仔 stagecoach條村巴好似執o左好耐
1/19/1999 00:23 Kevin Wong 而家第一城同嘉湖已經俾佢地'lap'晒(指城巴)
1/19/1999 00:24 Fai 輝仔 山水有相逄, 以前冇o左, 而家有番夠本!
1/19/1999 00:25 Kevin Wong 哈哈~~
1/19/1999 00:25 Fai 輝仔 會唔改番哂logo同名?
1/19/1999 00:25 Kevin Wong 唔知喇
1/19/1999 00:26 Fai 輝仔 我睇班英國佬點都比徐生識搞巴士
1/19/1999 00:28 Kevin Wong 咁呀李生會唔會'飯碗不保'呢?
1/19/1999 00:30 Fai 輝仔 捷記顏生有份, 仲唔剷走個當年的叛徒?
1/19/1999 00:31 Kevin Wong 新logo會唔會插枝旗係食鬼上面呢 ^_^;
1/19/1999 00:32 Fai 輝仔 成功征服, 還我中華!
1/19/1999 00:35 Kevin Wong 仲要將對手降服tim :>
1/19/1999 00:38 Fai 輝仔 仲要插支旗上去, 好似人o地打勝仗咁
1/19/1999 00:38 Kevin Wong 係就'大快人心'囉 ^o^
1/19/1999 00:39 Fai 輝仔 VA62, 64會唔會隨光復而歸隊?
1/19/1999 00:39 Kevin Wong 仲有CX1-8呀
1/19/1999 00:40 Fai 輝仔 八部CX同聲同氣, 但兩部VA要同佢十二位姊妹做對頭喎!
1/19/1999 00:41 Kevin Wong VA61 v VA62, VA63 vVA64 !?
又幾攪野喎
1/19/1999 00:42 Fai 輝仔 o係街度撞番, 昔日一齊上, 今日成對手
1/19/1999 00:43 Kevin Wong 咁o既話都算係香港巴士史上一大奇聞 :)
1/19/1999 00:43 Fai 輝仔 唔錯! 唔錯!
Article 21: (Request 1)
Why not allow more HK compnaies to operate route in Kowloon & NT, even the small HK Island of just 80 sq. km. can accomodate 2 large British bus companies??
In fact, KMB monopoly made the sky high fare like that of 203 & 208, and poor service, like Ducks on all Ho Man Tin routes except for 109, huge sized hotdogs running on 53 at 1 hour per bus & losing heavily, etc. So it is the time to cut the poorest KMB routes to others to operate!!
291/291A Siu
Article 21: (Request 2)
一百歲唔死都有新聞。
風水輪流轉。
今朝看我！
同行如敵國。
有此一朝？
你都有今日？
（請擇其一）
想當年一同並肩作戰，如今已成陌路人。唉，你知我講邊幾部車喇。
不過阿邊個都有今日，鬼叫阿邊個邊個玩到咁大，渣都蝕埋。
小心地位不保，兄台。
V3123
Article 21: (Request 3)
Of course CMB Guy Arab V!! There was a Guy Arab V entered service in 1963, but retired late in 1996, and hence served HK for 33 years, the longest record!!
And it is extremely surprising that why CMB buses are allowed to serve people for so long time, even there is a law that buses cannot serve people after they are 17 years old?
They are VA62 & VA64 of CMB vs NWFB VA 51-61 & VA 63!!
291/291A Siu
Article 22:
Re: 新巴模型創意版3
9822 DA53 (felixt@accessv.com) from 209.5.197.8 at Tue Jan 19 00:30, 1999 said:
> CTB-1024 (wailap@netvigator.com) said:
> 特別新聞！！
> 據聞新巴創意版3會於本星期三面世
> 資料如下：
> 車隊編號 ：VA60
> 路線 ： 112
> 目的地 ： 北角
> Banner 係 '一陣見' ，'We must stop meeting like this'
想問0下VA54係咩廣告，而家賣幾錢？
Article 22: (Request 1)
> CTB-1024 (wailap@netvigator.com) said:
>
> VA54既廣告係：
> 一切從新開始
> This Bus has ears
> 而家如果仲有得買，應該係$288.00
三X , KAM X , 80M , 商務X書局等都有存貨,$288 ,KAM X有10%off discount !
Article 23:
Re: 十大最經典,最有價值港澳巴士模型選舉 !
CMB (carlocwm@hkstar.com) from 203.80.110.76 at Tue Jan 19 02:04, 1999 said:
> 國光號 (carlocwm@hkstar.com) said:
> First :CMB 260's MCW --Gorgi 91707 1993年
>
> Second : Duple Metsec Trident (Cityflyer)
> -- Gorgi 44502 1998年
>
>
> Third : Dennis Dart (澳門新福利) --EFE 1997年
My favorite choice : EFE Leyland Atlantean XA 1 & XA 8
Gorgi-- Olympian CMB A20 Air Express & Volvo Olympian CMB VA60(Sliver)
Article 23: (Request 1)
> Danny (carlocwm@hkstar.com) said:
>
>
> 我選中巴 260--MCW , KCR K16--MCW & K15--Olympian ,
> 城巴 A11 CityFlyer(英國版), 新巴 1001 2號車
> 九巴 300號 (金 Alexander)
中巴 MC1,XA8
城巴 2200 Dennis Trident 新巴 1001 Dennis Trident
九巴 ATR1 Dennis Trident 九鐵 201-k18 Leyland Olympian
Article 24:
Re: 城巴被收購一問+今日有見
LF291 (wang5@hknet.com) from 202.67.217.216 at Mon Jan 18 23:38, 1999 said:
> 前中巴8號線太守VA51 (parnell@cyberec.com) said:
> 小弟一上到board,就見到有好多人話城巴真係俾xx收購,究竟情況係點架?
> 關唔關中巴事?會否有大大大變動?
有人話顏生有股份, 咁算唔算關中巴事?
照以往慣例係會改 Stagecoach 標誌 (會唔會好像新巴要一日內貼哂?)
以後有改動就慢慢來掛.
其實香港巴士界呢幾年都經歷幾多大變動, 尤其是港島區.
> 今日我居然見到1002有電子價錢牌,紅字,同城記的同一款.
1086 都係, 不過係用報站系統自動改價錢, 無需經司機手轉.
Article 24: (Request 1)
未必, 其實城巴只是個名, 個名在香港及英國都係一早賣o左(好似香港城巴都是徐博士的集團)
只不過城巴的控股公司換o左.
不過, 佢可以好似龍運o甘, 寫明Stagecoach 集團.
顏生何時入股Stagecoach, o甘Stagecoach在香港時佢又有冇份.
但以我所知, 顏氏後代都無興趣做巴士業務, 所以佢應該無分
下次講車隊編號小心o的, 1002可以係城巴,亦可以係新巴.
Article 24: (Request 2)
我諗好多部都已經裝o左電子價錢牌, 今日放學坐1022 106, 都有.
同城巴o個款差唔多, 不過係紅色.
Article 25:
Re: 模型的缺陷
Mark (s976677@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) from 202.40.137.110 at Tue Jan 19 15:50, 1999 said:
> S3M94(SLF) (matt4127@netteens.net) said:
> 唔知點解,有d巴士模型給人的感覺總係唔似真車,就以九廣巴士201模型為例
> ,路線牌箱不是在上下層之間,而是在上層與車頂之間(我今日見到,行k15),但
> 模型便巴牌箱整落上下層間.總之就覺得唔自然.
> 第二,我度過龍運架olympian12m模型同我架va40模型一樣長,但龍運架
> olympian就多左一隻窗仔.同trident模型度仲差一截,咁即係龍運架
> olymapin唔夠12米?定係trident13米呢?
Not only Long Win (LW3),
you can see the same thing at
KMB-3AV112(43201),3AV22(43207),
AD2XX(43203)
not only use a Volvo Olympian die-cast
but also have 8 windows (12M Dragon)
CTB-521(43205),395(43204),
STAGECOACH-8(43217)
SINGAPOURE SBS -SUPERBUS(43219)
From Mark (^_^)
>
> 仲有冇好例子?,歡迎討論
>
> P.S.乜原來AN有11.7米架?咁4捨5入咪即係12米?
>
>
> 今日俾阿sir插,又坐到新地鐵的
> S3M94(SLF)
> 30x Buspag3
Article 25: (Request 1)
Yes !!!You are right!!!! those bus is really made me unhappy
first ,they are overprice ,$200-$300 or more ,made in china
and those hepra bus is only $150 and they are made in Germany
also ,those bus is very 馬虎 ,11m are consider as 12m ,and
olympian is KMB type but it also in citybus ,it is better
to have a RX type lower decker windsceen since they earn a lot !!
Article 26:
Re: 沙田往青衣,未必49X最快...
Albion2 (h9728406@hkusua.hku.hk) from 147.8.145.32 at Tue Jan 19 02:32, 1999 said:
> 亞郎 (romanus5@hkstar.com) said:
> 今日有事入廣源,跟著本要去青衣繼續開工,
> 諗住搭49X,當時架DA3912準備開車(1:10PM),
> 但忽然急Call要先出黃大仙一趟,剛趕到架82X(GW6239),
> 於1:25PM到黃大仙.花了15分鐘辦妥事情,
> 再坐42C入青衣,1:40PM上了架DJ9186,
> 約2點正在德士古道天橋下之燈位遇上一49X,
> 竟是架DA3912!!!當時正往青衣碼頭途中...
> 我於2:05PM在長安落車,5分鐘後方見DA3912徐徐駛至.
> 自從49X換入大量3BL後,已大不如前了...
冇錯.49X以3BL為主力(有部份更是DA字頭.
今日還見到49X有樣版龍(相信是3N2)出現.
另外,轉車更快其實很常見.只不過是車資稍貴吧.
Article 26: (Request 1)
另一例子:由青衣村往土瓜灣可搭九巴41號或搭九巴44號到荔枝角道
轉九巴12A,但後者較快.
Article 27:
Re: What happen in Wanchai Ferry Pier?
DD9738 (n170@netvigator.com) from 202.73.253.111 at Tue Jan 19 10:18, 1999 said:
> Robert (roberthk@netvigator.com) said:
> Tonight, i saw all the buses which original terminal in
> Wanchai Ferry pier have been park outside the Southorn playground
> as a temporary buses terminal, does anyone know what happened tonight?
> The bus route inclued 905, 960, 961, 40, 40M....also the 8, 2A...
1月18,19,20,21日一連四日,菲林明道工程影響,所有灣仔碼頭
及灣仔會展作總站的路線,由晚上九時至翌日早上六時將會
改修頓球場作總站,路線,2A,8,N8,25A,25C,40,40M,905,960&961
昨天下午在灣仔碼頭搭960返屯中在灣仔碼頭內塞左20分的
DD9738
Article 27: (Request 1)
It's beleive that Fleming road Flyover is during closed(See
the bus notice of the route above).So those will take Southern
as temp. terminus.
Article 28:
Re: 2221行A線
輝仔 (c5124176@comp.polyu.edu.hk) from 202.85.58.42 at Tue Jan 19 00:14, 1999 said:
> 謝中 (dennist@hkstar.com) said:
> 今天晚上九時四十五分在馬頭圍道
> 見到一輛有行李架的2221行A22.
> 但看不到有沒有CCTV及報站牌.
城巴派車不嬲都唔聲唔聲嚇你一驚, 呢個已經唔係新聞, 平安夜
o個晚我都見過.
>
> 是否城巴將22xx都普躉轉入A線
> 而換出21xx山寨躉?
13xx行E21, 唔通城巴又想調D 22xx出來行102? :p
Article 28: (Request 1)
平安夜係因為要加車行 (即以前有雙層車假期會行 A 線一樣)
不過我覺得現時假期都唔使加 A 線車, 因為現時設計已經係夠應付.
其實 E 線用單層已經係夠, 調 22xx 來吸引人搭都好喎. ^_^
我驚依家巨龍再行多幾年柴灣道(早排先出通告話 8X, 118, 780 司機
一定要取巨龍行, 但都仲係有大富豪行), 大家都知甚麼車行斜路
會快些殘 (尤其是城巴維修...) , 我驚巨龍真係好快會殘哂.
調 22XX 行下起碼都好少少呀.
Article 29:
Electrical, Electronic?
輝仔 (c5124176@comp.polyu.edu.hk) from 202.85.58.42 at Mon Jan 18 23:31, 1999 said:
> kkk (kkk_0405@hk.super.net) said:
> I saw it today at rt.103 ,is that true ???And is that display like CTB 537 ???Thank you for your answer !!!
Is it electronic display, or dot matrix display?
Electrical seems a cloth rolled by a motor rather than dot matrix!
電動牌vs電子牌
--
輝仔
Article 29: (Request 1)
Any bus at or shorter than 11m can be used on 103.
Nope! This display is not the same as those on 537, as the
former gives a brighter appearance, especially at night.
100/911R/M1 Wong
Article 30:
Re: 問九廣東鐵巴士
R Lai (raymansc@asiaonline.net) from 202.85.93.90 at Mon Jan 18 22:17, 1999 said:
> CTB918 (majac@netvigator.com) said:
>
>
> 本人希望知道各條九廣東鐵接駁巴士0既服務時間
>
>
> 唔該晒
九鐵巴士
在九鐵網頁就有
Article 30: (Request 1)
除九鐵網頁外, 巴士資訊網都有九廣東鐵及輕鐵接駁巴士的資訊, 歡迎蒞臨.
John--2100
為你做的, 必定要俾別人更出色
Article 31:
邊個最抵打﹖
Dennis Law (elawcy@alpha7.curtin.edu.au) from 202.82.7.3 at Tue Jan 19 20:42, 1999 said:
有時我真的很不明白，何解有些人總是會把巴士上的路線牌和站牌當作透明的呢﹖
在幾日前，我在利東村巴士總站，看到城巴的986停泊在97A的站頭。當時該車正於
96號線服務。由於較早前曾經有板友投訴此車沒有八達通機，所以我就走到上車門
處查看。(結果我發現該車已經有八達通機了。)
但當我觀察完之後，我身後竟然有幾個人在等車﹗由於當時97A的尾班車已經開出，
所以我就問他們何解會站在那裡......
‘我們正在等96號車嘛﹗’那幾位仁兄大條道理地回答。
在97A的站頭排隊等96號車﹖有無搞錯呀﹖大佬﹗
到昨日早上十時多，我跟爸爸在美孚一起等候6號車，前往旺角。可能由於當時接近
司機的午飯時間，有一部38A(DM25)就被安排在6號的站頭上客。而停在他隔離的，
是一部6號普通車。
不知是否因為6號普通車的收費跟38A相同的關係，當那部38A正在上客時，竟然有些
6號線的乘客上了車，而且還付了車費﹗
結果如何﹖可憐那位站長伯伯，就要無緣無故地安排過客手續了。
唉﹗香港的巴士乘客，有時真是......
Article 31: (Request 1)
話時話, 搭巴士如果上o左車, 除o左問人, 真係冇辦法自己睇番上o左
邊條線, 同埋部車係去緊邊度喎? 禮拜o個日返完教會歸家, 坐6C
在彌敦道三個女仔上車, 部車去到加士居道轉入去, 佢o地就開始
好憂心地討論: 乜部車咁行o既? 乜唔係去尖沙咀碼頭咩?
(6C去九龍城碼頭)
幾年前, 我坐85 S3M(其實係o係樓下企), 有個男人o係食為先上車, 蒲
上車, 部車就轉入聯合道, 個男人一見咁樣, 就即刻好尷尬咁問我:
呢部係咪95號?
o個時九記仲用緊布牌, 85同95都有S3M掛牌, 又停埋同一個站, 如
果埋站時前面有第二部巴士遮住個目的地, 真係會睇錯都唔出奇
o架!
到底有冇需要在車內設罝路線和目的地? 就算乳豬盤都話唔到俾你
聽部車係行緊邊個方向喎.
Article 31: (Request 2)
好多時巴士都唔係響自己路線條坑度上客，有咁o既情況出現，
不過係該批乘客「習慣」o左o者。
Article 32:
Re: 大預言家艾偈──年幾前預言城巴被收購
DL (ss78k@netteens.net) from 205.252.144.207 at Tue Jan 19 20:41, 1999 said:
> Colin Chang (kchang@mail.usyd.edu.au) said:
> 先同各位新板友介紹o下，艾偈係本板一位老板友Ivor o既外號，
> 係本板有「職銜」年代時兩位「機械師師長」其中之一。
>
> 話說年幾前某次本板板友敘會，Ivor提出o左一個話題，佢話城巴
> 批二手Stagecoach Olympian o既車身顏色(當時係Stagecoach三色
> 間加城巴logo)好有問題，佢話，只有俾Stagecoach收購o左o既公
> 司先會用三色間加原有公司logo，城巴係咪想俾Stagecoach收購？
>
> 當時，大家都一笑置之，只係當笑話咁聽，但估唔到，年幾前呢句
> 話，就響今日發生o左。
>
> 世事難料，邪，有時亦不能不信。
講開Ivor兄，我很想知道他的蹤影，因為他已有一段時間人間蒸
發，沒有再在Board上出場！
有空不妨來Ken Fung個網頁談巴士吧！
甘句一篇：板主努力，拓新領域
DL
Article 32: (Request 1)
艾偈兄已經離開巴士圈，走了去談他最有興趣的鐵路方面，他在RDB
經常貼文，外號EF6325（日本的鐵路用車之一），可以說是我的啟蒙
老師。
運輸迷（偏向鐵路）的Tony Ng
Article 32: (Request 2)
其 實 我 想 不 少 板 友 係 有 持 續 在 本 板 瀏 覽 既 ，
只 係 佢 地 在 旁 瀏 覽 而 冇 出 黎 貼 文 唧 .
講 真 ， 唔 係 真 係 個 個 板 友 都 係 讀 緊 書 ，
閒 時 就 走 黎 呢 度 高 談 闊 論 ，
有 好 多 仲 係 做 緊 野 架 ， 平 時 返 工 已 經 好 忙 ，
返 到 黎 就 算 得 閒 上 板 都 唔 想 貼 文 啦 ， 貼 文 都 用 好 多 時 間 嘛 !
Article 33:
Re: 城巴沙田火車站站長室一問
eric (bching@hk.super.net) from 202.64.34.3 at Tue Jan 19 18:30, 1999 said:
> Tom (98701932j@polyu.edu.hk) said:
> 城巴在沙田火車站只有半條170/N170,
> 他的站長室有甚麼用?
maybe for new route
i don't know
Article 34:
Re: 【昨日事故】地鐵衰左俾2號+巴士英皇道行80 km/h
VA48 (mirage13@netvigator.com) from 208.167.247.105 at Tue Jan 19 16:19, 1999 said:
> Nicholas Louie (nichlas@netvigator.com) said:
> 昨日係星期一，照例係去灣仔補習兼影巴士相。
> 我先晌太古站搭地鐵落灣仔，用了大約二十分鐘到灣仔（嘩）
> 同時，在入站前有部MC2行2號．到了灣仔，部MC2都已經行回程往筲
> 箕灣。
> 灣仔，影了兩部躉後去補習英文。
> 放學，去海邊搭M21（上次1077以十五分鐘由灣仔碼頭去太古地鐵站）
> 點知今次十分鐘就回到太古站，架2085仲先後差D隊埋LF118（88）、
> 1003（8P）、3BL133（690）、3018（694）及1537（529）
> 未見過司機如此瘋狂，於是去司機位看看。嘩！八十公里？！我有帶
> 手提，仲按了999，欠個YES就報了警。大佬，該處係近住魚涌站C
> 出口黎，您想去殯儀館您事，唔好咁對我啦！！！
> 點解地鐵會咁慢？點解英皇道可以行80 km/H？？
Why can maybe the driver think that the police is nothing
the fastest speed I take the bus when on that road is 65km/h
only
VA48
Article 34: (Request 1)
請勿濫用九九九服務，又唔係乜野emergency，慳手電費都唔係咁架。
如果架車係安全的話，又有咩問題呢？
或者個司機過左鐘，要追時間呢？
巴士司機壓力好大架，仲要搞埋0的咁的野，唉！
都唔知兄台有冇聽過唔好亂打三條九，咁0的真係需要幫助的人
就冇得救架啦。
Article 35:
Re: CUMMINS LT10 同 CUMMINS LT10 o既分別?
Vigor (wkli8@se.cuhk.edu.hk) from 137.189.4.5 at Tue Jan 19 16:47, 1999 said:
> GG8690 (94903735@alumni.cityu.edu.hk) said:
> ES 牌o既S3N 同FY牌o既某D S3N 一樣係用CUMMINS LT10,點解
> ES o既engine power 係177kw, 但係FY係176kw?
Probably because those on FY S3N have to comply with Euro I environmental standard,
and the tuning is different therefore.
Article 36:
Re: 城巴比Stagecoach收購o左呀!!
Transport Minister (p.chu@virgin.net) from 194.168.18.147 at Tue Jan 19 06:12, 1999 said:
> S3BL400 (sjs85230@sjs.hkcampus.net) said:
> 城巴比Stagecoach收購啦,你估o下D車會唔會有咩改變呀??
> 仲有可唔可以講o下Stagecoach D歷史呀??
>
>
>
> S3BL400
CTB are now using the livery of Stagecoach UK's new fleet.
Article 37:
Re: 尋車........
金魚 (n960@hkabc.net) from 202.73.253.96 at Tue Jan 19 09:14, 1999 said:
> 肥B (pat22@netvigator.com) said:
> 請問ATR59 HX8945, ATR67 HY754, ATR69 HY1092, ATR71 HY2088 屬於哪一個廠呢?
ATR59 元朗廠968
ATR67,69,71 荔枝角廠 2號仔
> 另外, 想尋找以下車輛之底盤No:AV417,418,420,422,423,425,426,428-430,433,435-437,439-445,447,448 & 450.
> 如有以上資料, 可 e-mail 給我.
> My e-mail address: 'pat22@netvigator.com'
> 十分謝謝各位提供的資料. Thank's so much!
巴士文已經同我講左,我會出手支援的.
九巴車牌專家
金魚字
金日金句:奧林匹克,上斜唔得
Article 38:
新巴 1086 行二號試報站系統
LF291 (wang5@hknet.com) from 202.67.240.31 at Mon Jan 18 21:14, 1999 said:
今朝上網睇到話新巴 1086 行二號, 想著定是新巴用二號
試報站系統及衛星導航系統, 於是下午便去望下.
一入到車廂, 發覺有個很大綠色箱放在第一左輪上面空出位置,
司機位上面亦有兩盒機件, 相信是有關組件. 價錢牌則用電子顯示形式.
報站顯示位置則如板友所述, 在上下層樓梯之後位置(比城巴的更大塊).
而整套系統是一組的.
1086 從筲箕灣開出後, 報站系統開始運作, 報站顯示會掃著下一站
的街名(雖用白紙遮住, 但都頗清楚看到), 每轉一個站亦會有人
讀下一站站名.(不過好細聲, 可能與是試驗性質有關)
總括來說試驗效果不俗, 每個站都能準確報出(完全無過龍報站情況),
是有幾個站在差不多到站前幾米才報出.
不過部 1086 行的聲音很怪, 不知是否與報站系統有關?
其實二號行躉不錯, 起碼無 82 有乘客唔肯上車情況.
後記:
二號一向有位渣熱狗都打呔夜更師傳, 好多人都知,
佢對公司真係好忠心耿耿, 以前中巴時代二號他就自製些宣傳二號句語,
今日佢又特登帶了部相機影 1086, 真犀利!
Article 38: (Request 1)
What time is it?I want to have a trip of this bus.
Is in English and Cantonese?
Very tired...
Oscar Tam!!
Article 39:
Re: I saw 1086 at Shaukiwan bus terminus....
LA11 Shing (b493332@hkstar.com) from 202.82.7.3 at Mon Jan 18 20:17, 1999 said:
> VA48 (mirage13@netvigator.com) said:
> I saw 1086 at Shaukiwan bus terminus the rt plate
> is displaying Shaukiwan 2.Is this bus on service
> today?
>
> VA48
Yes , I Saw It At About 10:00am
In North Point Towards Central .
By LA11 Shing (^_^) (^_^)
Article 40:
新巴員工刊物-『新一篇』巳經上。在網喇！
Tommy! (tommysiu@chevalier.net) from 202.67.240.31 at Tue Jan 19 20:28, 1999 said:
新巴員工刊物-『新一篇』巳經上。在網喇！
得閒就去睇喇！
URL:http://www.nwfb.com.hk/chi/news/index.htm
睇完新一篇z覺得好好睇既
Tommy!
Article 41:
Re: Stagecoach bought CTB, model bus valued?
Danny,CMB (carlocwm@hkstar.com) from 203.80.107.147 at Mon Jan 18 22:31, 1999 said:
> 國光號 (carlocwm@hkstar.com) said:
> CTB's bus model will become valued ? Stagecoach's bus model also become valued(inclued the Capital City bus & the London Stagecoach)which produced by Gorgi ? I'm worry about to give the chance for the business-man may push the price become higher & higher . And the bus fans unable to buy ! Should i go to buy quickly ?
定會有人借機會炒車或無良商人會加價,想買就快點買!
Article 42:
[問車]新巴特別用途車輛?
LF272加德士 (victory2@netvigator.com) from 206.161.50.4 at Tue Jan 19 20:41, 1999 said:
> 根據Danny C.Y.chan本新巴書話有兩部特別用途車輛，
> (DD9918,ED8847)請問係咩0黎0架？
Article 43:
鴨車
eric ching (bching@hk.super.net) from 202.64.37.90 at Tue Jan 19 20:40, 1999 said:
12月有什麼鴨車退役??
雞鴨迷eric ching
Article 44:
neophan
eric ching (bching@hk.super.net) from 202.64.36.136 at Tue Jan 19 20:33, 1999 said:
where is the neophan 15 Meters bus??
when will neophan 12 M service in KMB?
Article 45:
kam tin
eric ching (bching@hk.super.net) from 202.64.36.33 at Tue Jan 19 20:25, 1999 said:
what buses are in kam tim depot in kam sheung road
recently?
Article 46:
大相廣告●●●九巴NeoplanCentroliner大相
【香港汽車網絡快線】 (hanvas@netvigator.com) from 208.139.98.84 at Tue Jan 19 19:34, 1999 said:
【 大 相 廣 告 】 追 加 九 巴 NeoplanCentroliner 大 相
近 日 有 板 友 問 及 有 冇 九 巴 NeoplanCentroliner 大 相 ，
現 在 【 香 港 汽 車 網 絡 快 線 】 既 項 目 每 週 大 相 ，
現 已 追 加 九 巴 Neoplan Centroliner 既 大 相 ，
相 片 攝 於 香 港 會 議 展 覽 中 心 外 .
歡 迎 參 觀 .
＊ 每 週 大 相 現 存 大 相 有 :
九 巴 Neoplan Centroliner (AP1)
中 巴 丹 尼 士 統 治 者 型 巴 士 (DD1)
新 巴 第 ２ ０ ０ 部 新 巴 士 (#1100)
九 巴 Ｓ ３ Ｖ 老 虎 豪 運 輸 署 驗 車 相
歡 迎 參 觀 .
http://home.netvigator.com/~hanvas/hkvne/index.html
【 更 新 廣 告 】 新 巴 電 子 點 陣 牌 Collections
【 香 港 汽 車 網 絡 快 線 】 現 推 出 新 項 目 ，
新 項 目 名 為 'Electronic Displayer Collections'.
經 過 昨 晚 以 新 巴 路 線 M21 作 為 既 試 驗 ，
現 時 再 加 入 其 他 九 條 新 巴 路 線 ，
以 及 另 外 兩 款 較 特 別 既 新 巴 電 子 點 陣 牌 ，
希 望 各 瀏 覽 者 睇 完 之 後 俾 Ｄ 意 見 !
歡 迎 參 觀 .
http://home.netvigator.com/~hanvas/hkvne/index.html
Article 47:
One Question !
Citybus Friend (kc09707@school.net.hk) from 203.80.122.42 at Tue Jan 19 18:26, 1999 said:
一九九九, 三間巴士公司有什麼路線開辦?
Article 48:
An old case
50% Sad HR1969 (si439741@icard.hkstar.com) from 202.82.40.2 at Tue Jan 19 18:23, 1999 said:
Last month, I went to Plaza Hollywood(I am nearly a people living there..always go there)
when I went along a corridor, I found that there was a model shop with many buses models. THEY CAN SELL ATR1 IN 438!!
How crazy they are!?
---
Promise myself to give up. Never to find him again
HR1969 (Partly Sad Version)
Article 49:
Re: Find Buses.
金魚 (n960@hkabc.net) from 202.73.253.107 at Tue Jan 19 21:13, 1999 said:
> 50%Sad HR1969 (si439741@icard.hkstar.com) said:
> As the topic.
> DK319
3N132 沙田廠 43X
> DM6533
S3N2 沙田廠 SPARE
> DN860
S3N76 沙田廠 SPARE
金魚字
金日金句:奧林匹克,上斜唔得
Article 50:
新巴1086
1338 (syhung@netvigator.com) from 208.151.81.167 at Tue Jan 19 17:51, 1999 said:
今日搭2號翻屋企,本來應該係上ML?? 0既,
但後面無端端厘左架1086,所以即刻上車.
一上車就見倒個衛星導航系統,係長方體,
綠色0既.0係上層樓梯0個到有個類似報站
系統的物體,對落下層0個個位都有.個引擎
0的好高音,架車都幾夠馬力.
Article 51:
[廣告]182巴士商場 更新
九巴之友 (yscwong@hkstar.com) from 202.82.40.2 at Tue Jan 19 17:40, 1999 said:
是次更新如下:
1.加入新巴DM介紹
2.本週大相為新巴2070行走M20
3.城巴相簿加入422行走788,1513掛S2路線牌
2700及工程車合照
4.新巴相簿加入VA61行走948,2042行走110
5.九巴相簿加入AV531行走89X
6.龍運相簿加入lance行走S62,lance行走S63
*由即日起,所有新相片皆為jpg檔,其餘的陸續更換!
歡迎參觀
九巴之友
Article 52:
[questions]
TAM (98701932j@polyu.edu.hk) from 158.132.14.15 at Tue Jan 19 17:32, 1999 said:
1. It seems that many people HATE Mr.Lydon Rees, why?
2. Many people are willing Mr.Ngan to take over Citybus,
does him become an idol of FANS OF BUSES?
3. How come many people link Mr.Ngan to Stagecoach?
I think that even Stagecoach take over Citybus, there will
have no big changes to Citybus.
Actually I am very excited to see the two biggest bus operator
of Britain to have a battle in HK.
My personal opinion is hoping that Stagecoach become the
final winner.
Article 53:
新城兩巴加車加出禍,運輸處可能作出檢控
金魚 (n960@hkabc.net) from 202.73.253.68 at Tue Jan 19 17:24, 1999 said:
今日我看方向日報,A2版最低有關城巴8X同新巴8P因為鬥加車
形成交通擠塞,運輸處可能向兩巴作出檢控
話時話唔只8P同8X,連5系+10 VS 18都係因為兩巴鬥加車而令
西區成日塞巴士,看來兩巴都要檢討檢討啦
今日同Kevin Wong一起在CYBER CITY玩巴士GAME
玩到轉迴旋處時轉過龍的金魚字
金日金句:奧林匹克,上斜唔得
Article 54:
Hong Kong Models Web site?/h2>
Isaac Wong (iwong@fl.net.au) from 202.181.0.18 at Tue Jan 19 12:21, 1999 said:
UPDATED!
http://www.users.fl.net.au/~iwong/model.html
thanks!
Article 55:
再次求救!!!!
Kevin (a7226@netvigator.com) from 208.139.121.223 at Tue Jan 19 01:06, 1999 said:
我的 ttd alter 不見了! 請問各位網有知否
在那裡可download 到呢!如知, 懇請告知我吧!
無限感激!
Article 56:
創意手版模型
CTB-1024 (wailap@netvigator.com) from 208.151.74.216 at Tue Jan 19 00:13, 1999 said:
巴鼠世界現有'超級無敵創意手版'模型展示，名單如下：
都普新巴，
三款都普中巴（分別有全白色，奶黃及藍色，銀色及藍線）
三款九巴 金色都巴，全白都普，全白版亞歷山大Trident
Article 57:
金躉行26
Allen Lee (AV171) (terrykkl@hkstar.com) from 208.167.237.62 at Mon Jan 18 23:32, 1999 said:
正話放工，在順天見到部都普躉行26號，正呀！
Allen Lee
AV171
Article 58:
【網頁廣告】昔日中巴更新及加相
CMB DA82 (da82@netvigator.com) from 158.132.14.5 at Mon Jan 18 18:38, 1999 said:
主頁相片更新為『某日中巴派了DA19行走9號線』；
專題相片加入新專題－－新巴新廣告，相片共8張；
新巴非空調巴士行車証亦同時更新，及減去LM、DM資料。
（特別嗚謝：智叔及提供資料者為新巴非空調巴士行車証提供資料）
歡迎參觀！
昔日中巴網主,
DA82,HB8095.(W.T.Ho)
Article 59:
Volvo Acquires 12.85% of Scania
STARenault 3303 (dccheng@acs.itd.uts.edu.au) from 203.88.229.225 at Mon Jan 18 18:35, 1999 said:
For more details, see the website of Australasian Bus & Coach Magazine.
SuperBus Australia
Article 60:
Is CMB coming back?
100/911R/M1 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) from 208.167.245.221 at Tue Jan 19 22:06, 1999 said:
I was having dinner with my ex-colleagues, none of them being
bus fans. They said Little Mr. Ngan is holding a great stake
(shares) of Stagecoach, so it can have enough cash for the
purchase of Citybus.
Does that mean CMB is coming back?
Yes, this time it'll provide full A/C service, though I wonder
if it'll provide the 'good' service like the old days...
such as 30-40 minutes frequency for 25A (ex-11A)...
100/911R/M1 Wong
Article 61:
【相片推介】新巴2078行914+城巴1332行E21
Dennis Law (elawcy@alpha7.curtin.edu.au) from 202.82.40.2 at Tue Jan 19 20:56, 1999 said:
如果大家想索取以下兩張相片的hard copy的話，歡迎與我電郵聯絡。
Article 62:
巴士網頁問題
GZ5818 (kytse1@netvigator.com) from 208.139.120.146 at Tue Jan 19 22:06, 1999 said:
我最近做了一個巴士網頁,
請問可否在沒有徵詢網主下登出其網頁(網頁推介)?
謝謝.
GZ5818
Article 63:
Summary of KMB route 26 today.
100/911R/M1 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) from 208.167.245.221 at Tue Jan 19 22:13, 1999 said:
A quick summary of what I saw being allocated on KMB route 26
today...
In the morning, I saw 2 Duple ATR's on 26.
In the afternoon, I saw a 3AV headed to Tsim Sha Tsui, a 3AD
from Tsim Sha Tsui, with AS3 and ATR88 (Alexander bodied)
It seems like anything longer than 11m was on 26 today!
It would be great if one AL, AV, AD, and an ADS were also
on 26 today!
100/911R/M1 Wong
Today's 26 reminds me 1A not too long ago...all types of buses!
Article 64:
What I heard from non-bus fans...
100/911R/M1 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) from 208.167.245.221 at Tue Jan 19 22:20, 1999 said:
Today I overheard the following conversation by some non-bus
fans...
Case 1.
During the financial report of certain radio station, the commendators
were talking about the takeover of CTB by Stagecoach. One of
them said, 'Since Stagecoach is a British Bus company, will
it introduce some of those red buses to Hong Kong?'
(does that mean there will be Routemasters in Hong Kong?
Or more hotdog service as some of you like?)
She also said 'Since Stagecoach and NWFB are British companies,
would it be great to introduce some other competitors from
some place else?
(hinting Japan or China? Oh no! Then there would be a bunch
of super high floor buses lor!)
Case 2
I'm temporary working in Tsim Sha Tsui East now, and I overheard
the following conversation in the elevator.
A girl was asking a guy, 'why don't you take 11X to work?
It might be faster!'
The guy replied, 'Oh! 11X has no A/C lor! Those buses are
also old! So I'd prefer 215X instead.'
100/911R/M1 Wong
