Today's Articles' : 13.
Articles' Numbers: (19971017_01-13)
Article 1:
今天特別所見
Thomas (wcw@hkstar.com) at Thu Oct 16 19:01, 1997 said:
今早途經第一城，8：00左右，見到陳自瑜先生在第一城
十字灣度影相，見佢一袋二袋咁，仲用支大炮相機，
久違了的他-肚腩大了，是第二冊書好賣吧！
其實o個個位唔係咁好影o者...(-_-)
Thomas
Article 2:
今日見到新dart,未出牌.....
G302 (plaxton@chevalier.net) at Thu Oct 16 19:19, 1997 said:
今日在九龍城見到2部未出牌的Dart.Plaxton-SLF車身,未出牌.白色
車身,底部有九巴dart的灰色.兩旁白色車身中帶有綠色圖案.最衰無
帶相機.因為是上學中途lunch的時間.究竟這一些dart是哪一間巴士
公司訂購的呢?
Article 3:
Re: 北區車轉南區車!
GR6291 (klaleung@hkstar.com) at Fri Oct 17 00:04, 1997 said:
511 (wckit@netvigator.com) said:
> 以下北區車會轉南區車:
> 341,444,445,446,450,505,506.
請問資料從何處得來呢？
GR6291
Article 3: (Request 1)
Only 341,445,446&450 have served the franchised division.
444,505&506 always are Non-Franchised bus, except when seving E21 when Citybus had not enough buses. But they still carry PSL discs.
Article 3: (Request 2)
444, 446, 505 & 506 係 628 的掛牌車, 不過近排好似有 301, 316
(中電車) o係度, 505 & 506 就唔多見. (可能 628 唔需要雙門車吧)
(但我就覺得好需要.)
彩雲&坪石村長-VOLVO.
Article 3: (Request 3)
444 has been serving on franchised route 90 together with 442 when they were first put into service in 1995. However, shortly afterwards, the 11m Olympians in the North division needed an overhaul. In order to avoid a shortage of buses, 442 and 444 were transferred to the non-francised fleet.
For further reference, you can refer to 'Bus Focus' issued in September and October 1995 (Fleet news section). Also I have got two photos proving that 442 and 444 have been served on franchised route 90. For those boardmates who are interested, please send me a message through the E-mail address listed above. Thank you!
Article 4:
Re: 城巴操車
巴巴生 (kenlit@hk.super.net) at Thu Oct 16 22:24, 1997 said:
Colin Chang (kalim@netvigator.com) said:
> 呢排我成日朝早番學時o向華富村同薄扶林道見到城巴o的訓練十二米
> 、訓練雞同訓練奧林匹克操車，每架車內均有六七名司機跟，又有板
> 友朝早o向英皇道見到類似「晨操」，點解呢間公司會七點幾晨咁早就
> 操車呢？o的司機繁忙時間唔開車走去跟線？教車師傅又會咁早開車
> o既？
>
> 城巴真係奇怪......
梗係喇!D 司機都not yet 畢業
Article 4: (Request 1)
城巴家陣係 '唔夠人' , 兼且 '勁唔夠車' , 所以
相對之下咪好無奈咁 '有人剩' 囉! ... 有說指D 城巴
司機要輪流造 '士碑' 添... 死未?
Article 5:
Re: 671 太長嗎?
eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) at Fri Oct 17 09:31, 1997 said:
Anthony Yuen (ayky@netvigator.com) said:
> Wayne (n170@netvigator.com) said:
> > 巴巴生 (kenlit@hk.super.net) said:
> > > 有否覺得條671好長? especially between North Point and Causeway Bay, is it better to skip that part, and use Eastern Corridor ?
> >
> > I consider OK! NO NEED Skip Causeway Bay,North Point. If you consider
> > that's not enough time to run, you can recommend lenghten journey
> > time to 100mins.
延長師傅走每一轉時間跟本處理唔到問題. 而家問題係 671 太兜路,
攪到南區客知道有車去東九龍都唔搭, 寧願出銅鑼灣轉地鐵.
> 正如有位人兄講過，671 其實係條好諗頭既線，不但打開北角至
> 觀塘既巴士（雖然 D 人已經搭慣地鐵），而且又比南區 D 人去
> 到東九龍，確是幾 initiative. 不過初望時間表，要等 12/15 分
> 鐘，等得來也搭左地鐵啦！
671 平日 16-20 分鐘一班, 假日 15 分鐘一班. 實在太疏了,
而且只開工半. 唔多掂.
> 要多人搭的話，一要大貼紙張、或油下車身，二是要「蟻多摟死
> 象」，學下前輩 118， 睇佢點靠呢兩招發嗎！（不過第二招可能難
> D﹕以城巴現在的 utility rate 來說，已是 overstretched 得很
> 大。看是要等下批車來才可以甘做了。）
671 要起死回生, 過東隧後一定要行東廊, 到波斯富街先至轉入去, 免得在
北角銅鑼灣塞餐死. 仲要加班, 10-20 分鐘就差不多了.
事實上冇人會用 $9.90 由東九龍坐去銅鑼灣, 因為唔抵.
Article 6:
今日所見 17.10.97
泰利 (h9500394@hkusua.hku.hk) at Fri Oct 17 10:26, 1997 said:
今 日 係 東 廊 見 到 解 凍 都 城 行 680
Article 7:
今日所見（十月十七日）
FatfishZ (fatfishz@netvigator.com) at Fri Oct 17 10:17, 1997 said:
1. CTB A631 行 92
Article 8:
每日一跪（十月十七日）
FatfishZ (fatfishz@netvigator.com) at Fri Oct 17 10:15, 1997 said:
編號：CTB469
路線：97
時間：0940
地點：金鍾掭馬街
編號：CTB537
路線：170
時間：0950
地點：香港仔隧道南區出口第一個站
Article 9:
368/968 並存,元朗西大執位
Gary Tang (purity@hkstar.com) at Fri Oct 17 01:53, 1997 said:
968開張後,元朗西站坑安排(由站長室計起)
68m,76k,64k,77k,277,54,968
而368及276則擺去?-11便利店門外.
Article 9: (Request 1)
Anthony Yuen (ayky@netvigator.com) said:
> 其實 968 有左之後，368 又仲要唔要黎增加海隧既塞車呢？
>
> 不如變做 968P ，行干諾道中，只停怡和大廈、天星、演藝、
> 移民局及灣碼，掉轉行可能有得諗……
368係行東隧的，為何會增加海隧既塞車呢？
Article 10:
[網頁廣告]中巴路線722網頁更新通告
DA82 (da82@netvigator.com) at Fri Oct 17 01:08, 1997 said:
已經回應所有在GuestBook內的文章,歡迎參觀!
另外,新項目將於2-3日後Upload.
中巴路線722網頁網主,
DA82,HB8095.
Article 11:
Re: 我又有問題啦！
諸葛亮 (s975318@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk.) at Fri Oct 17 07:24, 1997 said:
Anthony Yuen (ayky@netvigator.com) said:
> Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) said:
> > Dennis Law (fjrwpx@echidna.stu.cowan.edu.au) said:
> >
> > > 肥魚 (fatfishz@netvigator.com) said:
> > > > 想問o下大家彌敦購物線B1個 B 字點解？
> >
> > > Possibly it means 'Buyer'. This is better than using the prefix 'S' as 'S' can stand for 'Shuttle' as well as 'Shopper'.
> >
> > 乜 唔 係 用 完 A (AIRBUS) 用 B 咩 ?
> > BUYER 都 有 道 理 O既 ...
> >
>
> 甘城記條短短既 S1 又點解呢？ 唔通係 Superfluous？
> E21 及 E31 等怎樣？
E21 and E31 其實是 External<對外>的意思.
Article 11: (Request 1)
S=Shuttle
Article 12:
青衣廠新車疑問...
Piccolo (romeo.no.piccolo%f192.n1000.z128@iconet.hongkong.net) at Fri Oct 17 12:56, 1997 said:
艾莎 (96024880d@polyu.edu.hk) said:
> Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) said:
> > 昨日去了青衣廠, 仍有一批 DRAGON 和 OLYMPIAN 底盤,
> > 長度不詳...
> 中間上層有一小窗, 下層有兩小窗喎?! 仲唔係十二米?
> 仲有呀, 青衣廠就有百幾架新 AD.
有冇人知青衣廠那批車用的是甚麼車頭?
九巴幾時訂呢批車番黎的呢?
九巴又會幾時砌呢批車/ 將呢批車投入服務呢?
...
Article 13:
e-mail a/c 及多部十二米車行68m
Gary Tang (purity@hkstar.com) at Fri Oct 17 16:19, 1997 said:
本人的e-mail address
如閣下於本月十三日(星期一)中午後曾向本人send e-mail,
懇請閣下再將e-mail re-send 到本人新的e-mail address.
Thanks for your attention.
另外,昨晚由屯門來往元朗所見,
有兩部3AD及一部3AV(DKNY)行68m,
估計那是968的新車.
