Today's Articles: 30.
Articles' Numbers: (19971215_01-30)
Article 1:
Re: Training Bus!
100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) at Sun Dec 14 19:16, 1997 said:
Boby (AS1) (kc370957@netvigator.com) said:
>
> Which types of buses does KMB use for training purpose?
From what I know, KMB uses G, N, 3M, AA and occasionally S3V for training purposes. Although I've seen pictures of AM painted in training bus livery before, I'm not sure if it still exists.
> And how about CTB and CMB?
CTB uses 2-axle Leyland Olympians, Atlanteans, 102 and 104 12m Leyland Olympians (I doubt these two have A/C though) for training purposes. Though someone saw a 7xx with an extra mirror on training before.
CMB? Not sure! Probably the good old T-19 or XF.
>
> Besides, does KMB have any Service Truck that is converted
> from the old buses?
I think there is one converted from an Albion. I'll leave other experts to provide you the details.
100 Wong
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> Boby
> AS1---FU482
Article 1: (Request 1)
先試講講用咩車o黎掛''口水裷''(學車):
由於做車長/司機不論男女都要考大牌(九記都冇晒AT咯), 所以當然唔會用細車.
九記係雞鴨(以前係寶, 最後一部學堂倫敦寶(沙廠)已經o係大約兩年前退役);
而木瓜就有坡柴同前嶼巴雞; 中記呢, 倫敦寶囉.
好o勒, 考到牌o勒, 又用咩車o黎操車呢? 除o左用正式學堂車之外, 三間公司
都會o係現役專利車隊裡面抽車o黎做路線實習. 至於話抽咩車就好難講, 一般
係抽返同果D新紮師傅將要做o既路線所用車種相同或相近o既車. 而為o左
有系統地培訓師傅仔駕大車, 九記同木瓜分別將兩部12米車撥入學堂. 九記o既
係兩部3M; 而木瓜o既就係由非專利部退役o既102同104.
九巴好似係全部大乏力o黎o既. 反而木瓜就改o左部雞, 成日擺o係小西灣總站o既.
Mike NG(LF126)
Article 1: (Request 2)
唔 止 , 仲 有 ０００ 【 三 菱 】 .
Article 2:
Re: Old bus routes: 52
ANDY C.K.NG (ckng@ee.cuhk.edu.hk) at Mon Dec 15 00:42, 1997 said:
Eric Choi (ericchoi@aicom.com) said:
> I want to know the following information of those old bus
> routes:
>
> They are all KMB routes: 1K, 2K, 3A, 3E, 5K, 6E, 11M, 12B,
> 13, 13A, 13B, 13C, 13E, 13K, 14A,
> 15B, 15C, 15M, 19A, 33, 35, 46A, 52,
> 72K, 84K, 289.
>
> The questions are: 1. What were their terminates?
> 2. What fleets did they use?
> 3. What replace them now?
>
> THank you very much for your great help!
52: (before 1980)
Tuen Mun - Tsuen Wan Ferry
The terminus in Tuen Mun was in San Hui, near San
Fat Estate.
(~1980 - ~1982)
Yau Oi - Tsuen Wan Ferry
The terminus in Tuen Mun is beside Oi Ming House,
inside Yau Oi Estate
Use (2L ?)
(~1982 - ~1984)
On Ting - Tsuen Wan Ferry
(2L? -> 'Short Cow'?)
(~1984)
On Ting - Cheung Sha Wan
The Cheung Sha Wan terminus is beside the place
where Cheung Sha Wan Plaza is.
Changed to Guy Victory since then.
(~1985 - 1986)
Tuen Mun Ferry - Cheung Sha Wan
The Tuen Mun Ferry terminus is the place where it
becomes Goodview Garden now.
(1986 - 1992)
Tuen Mun Town Centre - Cheung Sha Wan
The Cheung Sha Wan terminus was extended to Fat
Tseung Street later.
(1992)
Changed to 52X(Tuen Mun Town Centre - Sham Shui Po
Ferry). It no longer via Castle Peak Road(Ting Kau
Section), Tsuen Wan and Kwai Chung.
Article 2: (Request 1)
我答 3E:
1. 佐敦道碼頭 - 慈雲山 (惠華街)
2. 全都普 JUBILANT
3. '易靈三姨' 囉.
--
DX 2437!
Article 2: (Request 2)
Eric Choi (ericchoi@aicom.com) said:
35：石蔭至荃灣碼頭
用車：平方寶
俾乜線取代：純粹路線取消
46A：麗瑤至荃灣碼頭
用車：圓頂寶
俾乜線取代：與30號合拼
有錯請提出
荔景337傻佬
Article 2: (Request 3)
記憶中 35 臨去之前好似有用雞行, 不過唔係記得咁清楚.
仲有, 35 唔係取消, 而係同 31 合併. 而家 31 咁兜法, 係因為
佢地合併左嘛.
35 合併果陣, 235 安蔭 - 荃灣 (循環線) 開辦, 代替一部份原先
由 35 服務的範圍.
Victor
Article 2: (Request 4)
Old Albions (AD 70xx) were running on rt. 52 on those days
This change ended the service of the legendary 50 series.
50M was cancelled since then
On the same day rt. 53 was extended from Castle Peak Bay to
TW Ferry. The old Castle Peak Bay terminus was situated beside
the gas station (Caltex?). I think it is now used by LRT feeder
route A59. I have seen [G] running on rt. 53 as early as 1985,
but those were probably buses on order.
y k
Article 2: (Request 5)
> > 53 used second-handed AEC (2A), Daimler F, and Guy in 1980's.
> > Now it use G, N, M and BL.
>
> I want to add these routes: They are routes 11A, 20, 21M, 25,
> 44A, 69, 69K, 70M, 71, 82X(Lion
> Rock Tunnel one), 95A and 95K.
>
> Thank you for your reply!
I want to add route 31A, 32A , 32R, 34A, 34B, 52R, 60R, 74R,
75R, 78A, 79A to discuss. I remember my grandfather told me
that he took 78A and 79A to Ping Che and Sha Tau Kok.
Again, thank you very much!
Article 2: (Request 6)
11A: Seems no such thing in KMB.
20: Jordan Road Ferry <--> Oi Man. Combined with 8.
Fleetlines are used.
21M: Choi Hung MTR Station --> Choi Wan (Circular). Cancelled
due to the competition of Maxicab 16.
BL having CSVT machines are used.
44A: Cheung Ching <--> Tai Kok Tsui Ferry. Route number changed
to be 43C.
Baco Fleetines are used.
69: Yuen Chau Kok <--> Choi Yuen Estate. Route number changed
to be 73A.
Guy Victorys are used.
69K: Fanling KCR Station <--> Luk Keng. Cancelled due to lack
of passengers.
70M: Kowloon Tong MTR Station <--> Sui Wo Court. Same as 80M now.
71: Jordan Road Ferry <--> Wo Che. Same as 81 now.
82X: Cityone Shatin <--> Kowloon Tong MTR Station. Cancelled
due to the compeition of Citybus non-franchised route 62R.
BL having CSVT machines are used.
95A: Kwun Tong (Elegance Road) --> Tsui Lam (Circular).
Route number changed to be 95M and dual-way service provided.
Jubilant is used at early beginning, then S3N are used until now.
95K: Tsui Lam <--> Mong Kok KCR Station. Extend to Jordan Road
Ferry and route number changed to be 95.
S3BL are used at early beginning. Then S3M are used later.
In this December, A/C buses are added.
Article 2: (Request 7)
11A -- Jordan Road Ferry to Kowloon City Ferry
(Reference from 94,99 bus homepage )
Article 2: (Request 8)
25 - Kai Tai Airport ~ Star Ferry
31A - Shek Lei ~ Tsuen Wan West, Sham Tseng
32R - Shing Mun Reservoir ~ Tsuen Wan Ferry
34A - Kwai Shing East ~ Tsuen Wan Ferry
52R - Tsuen Wan MTR ~ Ting Kau
71 - Wo Che ~ Jordan Road Ferry
74R - Tai Po KCR ~ Luk Keng
75R - Tai Po KCR ~ Bride's Pool
Article 2: (Request 9)
According to the KMB routes report
of transportation department(1975):
52 Tuen Mun Market -- Tsuen Wan Ferry
Timetable Frequency
From Tsuen Wan Ferry:
6:22 a.m. – 9:52 p.m. 15 mins
From Tuen Mun Market:
6:15 a.m. – 9:45 p.m. 15 mins
Fare (Section)
Tsuen Wan
1 20￠ Ting Kau
2 50￠ 30￠ Tai Lam Chung
3 70￠ 60￠ 30￠ Tuen Mun
Distance:12.8 mile(20.60km)
Time for whole distance: 48mins
vessals:Albion,Daimler,Seddon Pennie etc.
average passangers a day: 6209
numbers of vessals: 4
numbers of bus stop: about 37-38
F-stephen
Article 2: (Request 10)
Hope that you can read Chinese...
以我所知...
1K 九龍車站(南行循環線), 曾改由旺角火車站開.
印象中開線及取消時都用N, 包括N364, 不過中間可能曾用寶.
2K 九龍車站(北行循環線), 亦曾改由旺角火車站開.
開線多用Albion豪華巴士, 後用寶至取消.
3A 慈雲山-竹園/黃大仙, 後改至竹園村.
最初用乜車唔知, 取消時N.
3E 慈雲山(惠華街)-佐敦道碼頭, 一直用黑金剛, 被203E代替.
5K 最初稱5B, 觀塘碼頭-九龍車站, 用過珍寶及N.
最後與13A合併成13K.
6E 長沙灣-觀塘(月華街), 用過珍寶, DM及N. 冇線代替.
11M 鑽石山地鐵站-新蒲崗(循環線), 未見過, 後與29合併成29M.
12B 橫頭磡-美孚, 後遷至樂富. 未見過用乜車, 冇線代替.
13 彩虹-佐敦道碼頭, 曾用AEC, 寶, S3BL, 再用寶, 最後N.
與9號合併.
13A 下秀茂坪-九龍城碼頭, 後改往上秀茂坪, 及延至紅磡碼頭.
曾用AEC及N. 最後與5K合併成13K.
13B 中秀茂坪-觀塘碼頭, 曾用長牛, 平頂寶, BL, 最後再用寶.
13C 上秀茂坪-觀塘碼頭, 最初唔記得, 後用MCW至取消,
與13E合併.
13E 上秀茂坪-啟業, 一直都用黑金剛, 最後與15A合併.
13K 上秀茂坪-九龍車站, 一直都用N, 最後改為11X.
14A 油塘(高超道)-觀塘(裕民坊), 最初好似用火箭(Albion 41),
之後唔知了, 最後用BL, 直至與14B合併.
15B 藍田(北)-觀塘碼頭, 好似都用過火箭, 之後用大泵把
至與15A合併.
15C 藍田(南)-觀塘(裕民坊), 只知最後用黑金剛, 與16M合併.
15M 藍田(北)-觀塘地鐵站, 印象中用大泵把, 最後好似
與16M合併.
19A 觀塘(月華街)-功樂道(循環線), 最初唔知, 後一直用N244
至取消.
33 荃灣碼頭-深水步碼頭, 最初用Seddon, 最後用珍寶,
與33A合併.
35 荃灣碼頭-石蔭, 最後用珍寶, 與31合併.
46A 曾叫45A, 荃灣碼頭-麗瑤, 最後用雞, 與30合併.
52睇Andy Ng那篇吧.
72K 大埔工業村-大埔火車站, 我估一直都應該係用雞,
最後與75K合併.
84K 乜都唔知.
289 恆安-十四鄉(循環線), 只用過AT, 被299取代.
Ricky Chan
Article 2: (Request 11)
> 1K 九龍車站(南行循環線), 曾改由旺角火車站開.
> 印象中開線及取消時都用N, 包括N364, 不過中間可能曾用寶.
1K 用過雞行.
> 6E 長沙灣-觀塘(月華街), 用過珍寶, DM及N. 冇線代替.
AEC 都用過.
> 11M 鑽石山地鐵站-新蒲崗(循環線), 未見過, 後與29合併成29M.
11M 用亞比安維京型(好似係 AR 牌).
> 12B 橫頭磡-美孚, 後遷至樂富. 未見過用乜車, 冇線代替.
12B 用 AEC 大水牛行.
> 19A 觀塘(月華街)-功樂道(循環線), 最初唔知, 後一直用N244
> 至取消.
據聞係同 28A 合併.
> 84K 乜都唔知.
好似係大學火車站-富安花園, 後來俾 85K 取代.
Timmons
Article 2: (Request 12)
哦! 原來問緊這條84K, 我一睇以為問緊80年代去穗禾苑那條.
84K大學火車站-富安花園(循環線), 並非由85K取代,
椊純取消. 其間一直用平頂寶.
Ricky Chan
Article 2: (Request 13)
With the opening of the first MTR service in 1980, rt. 33
was split into 33 and 33M (TW Ferry to Argyle MTR (SYC St.))
Those days they are all fleetlines. Also existed were peakhour
rts. 33A/B/C serving Kwai Fong/Hing.
After the opening of
MTR TW line, all these 33A/B/C/M were combined into the new 33A
(TW Ferrry - Tai Kok Tsui Ferry). Rt. 33 finally got eaten by
rt. 33A in the 90's ( I don't know the exact time).
In the early 70's (73/74) both rt. 35 and 35A were run with
Seddon Pennie. The terminus used to be on the location of the
Tung Chi St. Market. Now buses have to stop beside it.
I saw old bull (AD 47xx) running on rt. 35 and London Jumbo
(2D) running on rt. 31 in the early 80's.
It was numbered as 45A because it used to stop at Lai King S.
If you have seen the picture of Lai King provided by Dennis, those old
bulls (Daimler A/B) were buses deployed on 45A.
y k
Article 2: (Request 14)
84K University KCR Station -> Chevalier Garden(Circular)
(1993 - 1994/95?)
Used Fleetlines
Cancelled without replacement
ANDY C.K.NG
Article 2: (Request 15)
1K - Kolwoon Station (South Bound Circular)
2K - Kolwoon Station (North Bound Circular)
3A - Tsz Wan Shan (North) ~ Chuk Yuen (Circular) <1991>
3A - Wong Tai Sin ~ Tsz Wan Shan <1990>
3A - Wong Tai Sin ~ Chuk Yuen <1983>
5K - Kolwoon Station ~ Kwun Tong Ferry
6E - Kwun Tong (Yue Man Square) ~ Cheung Sha Wan <1983>
6E - Kwun Tong (Yue Man Square) ~ Cheung Sha Wan (Kam Chen Street) <1990>
11M - Diamond Hill MTR ~ San Po Kong
12B - Wang Tau Hom ~ Mei Foo
13 - Jordan Road Ferry ~ Choi Hung
13A - Hung Hom Ferry ~ Sau Mau Ping (Upper)
13B - Kwun Tong Ferry ~ Sau Mau Ping (Central)
13C - Kwun Tong Ferry ~ Sau Mau Ping (Upper)
13E - Kai Yip ~ Sau Mau Ping (Upper)
14A - Yau Tong (Ko Chiu Road) ~ Kwun Tong (Yue Man Square)
15B - Lam Tin (North) ~ Kwun Tong Ferry
15C - Lam Tin (South) ~ Kwun Tong (Yue Man Square) (Circular)
15M - Lam Tin (North) ~ Kwun Tong MTR
19A - Kwun Tong (Yuet Wah Street) ~ Kung Lok Road
33 - Tsuen Wan Ferry ~ Sham Shui Po Ferry
72K - Tai Po Industrial Estate ~ Tai Po KCR <1990>
72K - Tai Po Industrial Estate ~ Kwong Fuk <1983>
84K - Yuen Chau Kok ~ Sui Wo Court <1983>
289 - Heng On ~ 14 Heng (Circular)
Article 2: (Request 16)
我想問史前問題:
(1)油塘最早巴士線是甚麼?
(據我父親說,油塘村初期入伙時,
22-26座及高超道所在地皆是山,
最早期巴士總站只有油塘9,11之間
前14B那個,並說最早期有條叫11D
線出市區,是嗎?)
(2)14號車經歷多次改變?
(父親又說,以前14線是快線,往來佐敦
不會停很多站,是嗎?)
F-stephen
Article 3:
Re: Old bus routes (HK Island edition)
Timmons (97063194@cpccux1.cityu.edu.hk) at Mon Dec 15 02:48, 1997 said:
Eric Choi (ericchoi@aicom.com) said:
> Furthmore, I want to know these old routes on HK Island:
>
> They are route 9A, 16, 17, 77, 79M, 81M, 82A, 87, 88M, 90M.
>
> 1. What were their terminates?
> 2. Which fleets did they use?
> 3. Which routes replace them?
9A : Sai Wan Ho Ferry -- Shek O
16 : City Garden -- Central (Macau Ferry), replaced by 10A.
17 : Central (Exchange Square) -- So Kon Po (Circular)
77 : West Point (Holland Street) -- Aberdeen
79M : Tin Wan -- Admiralty MTR (West)
81M : Hing Wah Estate -- Central (Douglas Street), replaced by 88.
82A : Quarry Bay -- Chai Wan (East),
then Sai Wan Ho Ferry -- Chai Wan (East), combined with 82.
87 : Hang Fa Chuen -- Central (Douglas Street), replaced by 88.
88M : Hang Fa Chuen -- Chai Wan MTR Station
90M : Ap Lei Chau -- Central (Douglas Street)
> And I want to know the information on those routes:
> CMB and CTB: route 83, 84, 85.
>
> 1. What were their terminates on the past?
> 2. Which fleet did they use on the past? and now?
83 : Tai Koo Shing -- Chai Wan (East)
84 : Hang Fa Chuen -- Shau Kei Wan
Fleet used : Past and Now LV and LF.
85 : North Point Ferry Pier -- A Kung Ngam
Fleet used : Past XF Jumbo, A6xx Atlanteen, Now 7xx Dragon.
> Thank you very much for your grat help again!
Your Welcome.
Timmons
Article 4:
Great CMB Service?
100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) at Sun Dec 14 18:31, 1997 said:
Although I'm not in Hong Kong right now, I just spoke with my brother (a non-bus fan) and he experienced the following:
He was waiting for a Rt.112 bus from Causeway Bay (near opposite of Sogo) towards Mongkok at 6:30 p.m. yesterday (Sat). As most of you know there is a 'station' with a 'manager' at that busstop most of the time.
His friends waited in line while he went to the 'station manager' and had the following conversation: (B=my brother, S=station manager, D=driver)
B: Is this the CMB time section?
S: Yes
B: When will it be the KMB time section? (which means full A/C service and Octopus)
S: I don't know
B: How many more non-A/C CMB bus do I have to wait until one arrives?
S: I don't know
So my brother and his friends waited 40 minutes, after 5 hotdogs, for an A/C bus.
S: Where the hell (bad language being used in reality!) did you go?
D: The xxxxing (bad language being heard by everyone on the bus) traffic jam got in the way. I had to run an empty run from So Uk.
Then the bus proceeded to the next stop on Canal Road...
S: (knocking on the entrance door, as a signal for the D to go)
D: Hey man! (bad language again) The xxxxing bus is only 30% full. I shall wait for some more passengers...
My brother and his friends began to wonder if CMB is operating like Red Vans, or perhaps if the drivers get 'incentives' (either legally or illegally) by picking up more passengers.
Please excuse me for the use of 'xxx' as replacements for the real words being used.
100 Wong
Article 4: (Request 1)
They just don't want to breath anymore unfiltered carbondioxide in the tunnel and get their clothes dirty!
Did you mean the Hong Kong direction? What time are you talking about? Do you think this is a good idea, given the traffic situation at XHT?
Sorry! So many questions! I just like and enjoy your opinions. Thankx!
100 Wong
Article 4: (Request 2)
For me, I would purposely set the meeting time late for allowances on traffic and A/C bus. Any delays, I would just call my friends and state the situation (traffic jam, of course). Then if I'm really in a hurry, MTR would probably be the better choice. (despite the fact I don't really like MTR at all!)
Or else I would 'transfer' by taking another bus at other stops. Like my case for Central-->Cheung Sha Wan with no A/C 105 (back then!), I took 300 and then changed to 171.
Unfiltered carbondioxide in XHT these days might shorten people's lives! (not to mention getting sick, hence die these days!)
The point is, what if I get on this hotdog and see a cold-horse behind me? (my excuse for waiting!)
But then if you were one of the passengers already on the bus, you might be quite a bit anxious.
Thankyou very much for your very objective opinion!
100 Wong
Article 4: (Request 3)
Therefore I always emphasize that don't wait too long.
Being a 'benificiary' to be waited by the bus, once I got
on the bus, I will be a 'victim' when the bus waits for
other potential passengers at later stops. So it is quite
fair to everybody.
--
DX 2437!
Article 4: (Request 4)
100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) said:
> Although I'm not in Hong Kong right now, I just spoke with my brother (a non-bus fan) and he experienced the following:
> He was waiting for a Rt.112 bus from Causeway Bay (near opposite of Sogo) towards Mongkok at 6:30 p.m. yesterday (Sat). As most of you know there is a 'station' with a 'manager' at that busstop most of the time.
> His friends waited in line while he went to the 'station manager' and had the following conversation: (B=my brother, S=station manager, D=driver)
> B: Is this the CMB time section?
> S: Yes
> B: When will it be the KMB time section? (which means full A/C service and Octopus
... Not quote ...
Just tell you about some of my personal exp. :
1 or 2 yr.s ago, I, who don't have much extra money (coins also) ,
was waiting for an NON-A/C 112 at Yee Wo St.,
at about 2000. I have NO CHOICE but only wait for > 50 min.s
in order to pass the KMB hours, and finally
get on a NON Air-Cond. 112 PROVIDED by CMBC.
Your brother still had a choice to get on a NON Air-Cond. bus,
but I have NO choice but wait.
Question :
Which one is greater ? The one who don't give you any choice but or the one who still give you a cheaper choice ?
FORCE YOU PAY MORE,
Piccolo
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Article 4: (Request 5)
> Non A/C for my brother (and me of course!) means A/C bus for your case, so I strongly believe allocating 50/50 for A/C and non A/C (alternately) would be fair to everyone.
Can't you get my meaning ?
The question is :
Can you get on a NON-Air Cond. 112 by paying 830 cents ?
While, can you get on a Air Cond. 112 by paying 680 cents ?
你究竟係唔係唔明我 講 乜?
個問題係:
究竟你可唔可以用八元三角搭一架熱狗112 ?
究竟你可唔可以用六元八角搭一架冷狗112 ?
Piccolo
Article 4: (Request 6)
For you, yes! For my brother (and especially me!), NO! To me, a hotdog can come by and go! I don't care! I won't get on it, even if you pay me $100!
Like I said, once I waited 65 mins for an A/C 69X.
Again, I want to stress 50/50 allocation of A/C and non-A/C bus is fair to everyone!
100 Wong
Article 4: (Request 7)
Not exactly! Yes, 50/50 A/C and non-A/C buses are being served. But then they're served by different company, which means I would have to wait at least an hour before the A/C bus company shift comes in! One A/C, then one non-A/C would be fair for everyone!
I've had bad enough experience on 914 with non-A/C bus. Which if I need to go to Causeway Bay from Tsim Sha Tsui, I would take 917 then 5B for the sure bet. (too bad no 917 on Sundays! once I gave up the trip of X11 on a Sunday because of non-A/C bus)
Sorry for the misunderstanding!
100 Wong
Article 4: (Request 8)
I like 914 in the contrary. It provides more frequent
schedules and more choices to me. I would consider totally
a waste of money and unnecessary to pay $8.90 for a
cold-horse journey that just lasts for 10 minutes from
Jordan to Sheung Wan. I think the air quality may be better
in WHC even compared with on Nathan Road (just personal
subjective feeling).
--
DX 2437!
Article 4: (Request 9)
eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:
> Agree. Being an HKU student, I don't like to take 970 after school
> because I spend $9.40 for 15 mins journey! Besides, no Octopus
> machine is also a reason I don't take 970. I would rather walk
> down hill and take 904/905. At 4pm, 904 is in KMB section,
> which means Octopus machines are installed in the buses. And
> 905 provides non-A/C cheaper service to Mong Kok. (It also
> takes about 15 mins for 905 going to Mong Kok.)
It can be seen that though we are so called Bus Fans,
our choices for choosing our transportation means in our
daily lives are based on rational judgements.
Although I had once so silly that run for more than 1,000
metres to chase and get on the Citybus 2100, my normal bus
travelling habbit is just the same as other people.
--
DX 2437!
Article 5:
Today CTB Trident Tour
Pirro Cheung (y931204@netvigator.com) at Sun Dec 14 19:14, 1997 said:
Today,I have some leisure time,So,I go to Tin Shui Wan to take
CTB Trident 2100!
I arrived Tin Shui Wan Bus Terminus at 2:00pm,The Trident is
alreday arrived.I immediately to see this bus.After 1 hr and
45 minutes left(at 3:45pm)The bus start to leave.
At Tuen Mun Highway,Most of the other bus were quickly pass
through by CTB Trident.When the bus arrive at Tsuen Wan
Ferry.There is a Volvo Olympian 961,Most of the passengers
of this bus were seeing the Trident!
It only use 1hr and 10 minutes for the journey.I feel this
trident is very good when travelling.I hope all CTB New Trident
will use at 969!
I still can't forget the journey
Pirro Cheung
AV134----GX7696
574------HD9422
Article 5: (Request 1)
What? 2100 rested at Tin Shui Wai for 1 hr and 45 mins? Same time for your trip!
I can't forget how those passengers on 200x of 88R stared at my (relatively stupid) CMB A/C bus, which motivated me to take a journey on 200x.
Good! At least you get to enjoy the bus for 1 hr and 45 mins, versus my trip on 2001 for 35 mins. Honestly, I didn't want to leave the bus at Sheung Wan at all!
I'm not putting down 2100, I know it's a good bus and I can't wait to try it! I also hope more 21xx will be on the way to Hong Kong!
Has KMB ordered any Duple Metsec Trident? How many?
100 Wong
Article 5: (Request 2)
I do not understand what this sentence about. Can you explain further?
From Buses by Ian Allan, KMB has ordered 40
Tridents with DM body.
--
DX 2437!
Article 5: (Request 3)
Sorry! Once I was on a CMB Rt.301 bus, a CTB 200? (B12) on 88R past by near Central. Some passengers on the B12 looked (down) at me (like someone who can't afford to ride on a B12 coach!
Just my feeling though!
100 Wong>
Article 5: (Request 4)
You should not have such feeling bcoz comparing betweeen
Route 301 and 88R, maybe 301 passengers pay more than 88R
in terms of per-distance-unit!
BTW, how much cost per Rt. 301 journey as well as 88R?
And what are their journey distances as well?
--
DX 2437!
Article 5: (Request 5)
Well, back then (before the fare hikes) Rt.301 cost $7.6, while 88R cost $19. Now Rt.301 costs $8.1, not sure for 88R!
So, are you suggesting passengers of 88R are paying less in terms of distance? If so, why are they getting better buses than someone who can afford (relatively) more expensive routes like 301?
I also tried the 'breakfast/newspaper' 88R! I loved it!
100 Wong
Article 5: (Request 6)
It is just the reason that Citybus doesn't want an empty
bus travel from the depot to serve the HKG-CHN service,
so it uses the luxury buses for the normal route. Similar
situation can be found in 2100 on Rt. 969, a luxury airport
bus serves a normal route.
--
DX 2437!
Article 5: (Request 7)
Isn't that good news for bus fans and residents at Shatin City One? Paying $19 (don't know what's the new fare) for taking a bus which normally costs at least $300. (roundtrip to Guangzhou)
100 Wong
Article 5: (Request 8)
Add the risk of losing the wallet and the bail (for being arrested for no reason, or perhaps for taking bus photos) in Guangzhou as well!
100 Wong
Article 5: (Request 9)
香港都有人打荷包o既o者,係香港影車都要冒呢個險.
另外,根據中華人民共和國公安法,係街上影車係合法o既(不包括公安,軍用車輛)
P.S.只要唔好做埋D明知故犯o既o野,就唔會俾人拘捕
縱橫中國大陸18個半月o既
伯虎(B-2467)
Article 5: (Request 10)
尋日我搭 2100 時, 部車在西九龍公路都大發神威, 逢車過車,
不過個司機對巴士迷就冇乜好感喇, 成日驚住我地會搞事, 騷擾
O的客咁. 我都理解O既, 而家有咁多衰巴士迷, 唉~~~
--
DX 2437!
Article 5: (Request 11)
咁又係呀, 家陣好多巴士迷呢, 坐親車好似老奉 (呢個字眼其實少用為妙架)
要同師傅傾下偈先安樂o既, 又唔知咁樣會令個師傅難做, 若果有便衣稽查上車,
呢鑊斷㊣之餘仲可能累到師傅俾人的入廠炒蝦拆蟹....
好似我第一日坐九記 Trident 咁, 架車一開成班細路就走上走落話要同師傅傾偈,
大佬, 人地渣緊車好得閒理你咩....你估個個師傅都咁鍾意同人傾偈架....唉!
呢 D 野順其自然就話好o者, 勉強真係冇幸福架! 睇下幾時俾師傅媽叉丫....
Article 6:
Bus's question
gouki (gouki@writeme.com) at Mon Dec 15 11:27, 1997 said:
How Much is the Bus?
&Merry Christmas
/\
/ \
/ \
/______\
II
Article 7:
Bus is expensive!?
gouki (gouki@writeme.com) at Mon Dec 15 11:22, 1997 said:
in 1998,Will the Bus fare going up
?
Article 8:
Re: True and False:
eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) at Mon Dec 15 06:21, 1997 said:
Eric Choi (ericchoi@aicom.com) said:
> Please help me to answer the following questions:
> Put true and false on the questions, if false, please
> explain the reason to me:
>
> 1. Due to the road condition inside Ho Man Tin Estate, route
> 7B, 8, 17, 18, 109 cannot use 11m buses.
>
> 2. Due to the road condition on the flyover which links Kowloon
> Station and Hung Ham. 11m buses cannot run on route 5C, 8,
> 11K, 11X, 21.
>
> 3. The road condition on Tsz Wan Shan leads route 2F and 5C
> cannot use 11m buses.
>
> 4. The road condition on Choi Wan leads route 3M, 10 and 21
> cannot use 11m buses.
All Yes.
> Why routes 23M, 28, 29M don't use 11m buses? road condition or
> passenger demand?
23M, 28: Road condition of Lok Wah Estate Access Road.
29M: Road condition in San Po Kong Industrial Areas.
>
> Thank You!
Article 8: (Request 1)
Eric Choi (ericchoi@aicom.com) said:
> Stephen Kwan (hhkwan@sympatico.ca) said:
> > eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:
> > > > Why routes 23M, 28, 29M don't use 11m buses? road condition or
> > > > passenger demand?
> > >
> > > 23M, 28: Road condition of Lok Wah Estate Access Road.
> > > 29M: Road condition in San Po Kong Industrial Areas.
> > >
> > One more thing on Route 28. Several years b4, an KMB official
> > said that no 11 metre buses can turn from Salisbury Road to
> > Hankow Road. So, how about Route 234X?
>
> Is routes 31, 31M, 32, 32B, 32M cannot use 11m due to the
> road condition in Upper Kwai Chung area?
>
> I have been to Cheung Shan and Shek Lei. I know Shek Wai Kok
> and On Yam can use 11m buses only.
It should be I have not been to Chung Shan and Shek Lei when
I was in Hong Kong. Sorry about my mistake.
Article 8: (Request 2)
樂華總站28 同 23M 條坑久唔久都有D 2A o既十一米車入去,
應該唔係問題.....
我相信問題係牛頭角個位有D問題,用11M 有困難,
而漢口道總站都擺唔到咁多十一米車.
相信係主要原因. ^_^
Article 9:
[路線消息]70P,70X,74A,89B
Ricky Chan (95098987d@polyu.edu.hk) at Mon Dec 15 02:05, 1997 said:
於彩虹臨時巴士總站發現通告, 由14/12/97起,
70P,70X,74A,89B (不包括889) 往新界方向,
途經彩虹臨時總站後, 改為右轉彩虹道, 支路, 龍翔道
返回原有路線.
並於龍翔道西行近鑽石山地鐵站加設一分站.
往九龍方向維持不變.
Ricky Chan
Article 10:
Re: 680 on Tai Lo Shan Tunnel
Hanvas 漢 華 (hanvas@netvigator.com) at Mon Dec 15 01:19, 1997 said:
walter (walterch@school.net.hk) said:
> 點解架680入到大老山隧道就好似死下死下?
究 竟 係 城 巴 #680 ?
定 係 九 巴 Route 680 ?
還 是 中 巴 Route 680 ?
Article 10: (Request 1)
小生山隧道裏面好多捉人地超速的物體，0的車長點開快啊？
Article 11:
Re: S3BL174
A340 (a9506004@ln.edu.hk) at Mon Dec 15 03:06, 1997 said:
walter (walterch@school.net.hk) said:
> About S3BL174. (not sure: 17x ? )
> I have seen this bus at Shatin (east) on 680(VA43).
> S3BL174 (Rt.8?)
> is a hot dog. It is different from the other
> Hot dog.
> It has A/C seats and have body like I have taken at
> that moment(VA43).
>
> I want to know how many KMB bus like that.
> Why it should equip with A/C seats?
因為這車與其他S3BL的車身規格不同。原裝車(配亞力山大車身)
在數年前燒毀。底盤留在車廠數年。至大約九五年，廣州的
穗景車身廠欲打隻本地巴士車身市場，遂替九巴從新為該車
製造了新設計的車身並裝好運回香港行走。新車身有一些新設
計，包括蔽路電視以觀察上層情況、廣播系統，還有類似冷巴使
用的L牌3+2座位(不過冇禁好坐)。在九巴車隊中它是獨一無二的，
之後穗景替不少單層巴(如二騷蘇，德仔)設計及建造車身，現在九
巴部分富豪都由它負責裝上車身。
至於為何此車用上新座椅就不太清楚了，可能是穗景或九巴想迎合潮
流吧。
A340
Article 12:
字軌/掛牌表錯誤紀錄一事
Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) at Mon Dec 15 00:25, 1997 said:
很多人在本板投訴字軌/掛牌表紀錄錯漏百出, 其實該表有一個機制去
剷除那些錯誤紀錄的, 就是以五人或以上投票否決該項紀錄了. 那麼何
不先行執呢項程序才在本板投訴呢, 因為看來錯誤實在太多, 在這裡
詳細地逐項講可能令本板水浸. (呢兩日已有好多以錯誤字軌/掛牌紀錄
為題的新文章了...) 當然如果涉及現行否決錯誤紀錄的機制是否有效
就要多俾意見啦, 但詳細地說如 AA49 是否 224X 掛牌等等好似對
於更正該項錯誤起不了什麼作用囉.
--
DX 2437!
Article 13:
2100---勁快車和態度差師傅！
風間火月 (adagatha@netvigator.com) at Mon Dec 15 00:23, 1997 said:
今日同其他板友去坐城記2100！
嘩！好快！由其係西九同屯公，逢車過車！
貨車？過！
巴士？過！
平治？照過！都咪話唔勁！（至少有75咪）
至於個師傅就．．．唉！
前面有人，。本佢！
有車Cut線，。本佢！
貨櫃車行得慢過2100，都照。本佢！
呢樣冇。甘慘，去到天水圍落車，稔住師傅走開，影下個錶板。者，
' 喂！要落車好落啦！ '
唔使下話，影相之嘛，使唔使做到。甘呀！
好啦！影飽影夠，走啦！哈！個師傅重要望住我們！唔通佢未見過靚仔？
話時話，坐2100時，個落車鍾成鬼日都有人撳，搞到架車站站停！
（落車門好似AF。甘，慢到跳樓！）
唔知個師傅係咪見我們係巴士迷，以為係我地玩野？
（喂！點會呢？我地唔似得果。的 ' 人 ' ）
請各板友留意：
如果你坐2100時，見到係個肥師傅操車，
請小心！
佢好可能係我今日見到。個位！
AS3/AV112 風間火月
Article 13:: (Request 1)
咁到站梗係要落車啦, 佢俾你影係人情, 唔俾係道理,
唔怪得佢架o番.
都話鐘燈虧左咯, 成半個月都冇整番呀?!
渣靚車新車o既司機特別慘, 成日俾人眼望望,
又要俾人影相, 又怕部車炒左唔知點交待, 都
好慘架, 等我地體諒下佢囉.
--
DX 2437!
Article 13: (Request 2)
學 肥 魚 話 齋 : 『 空 穴 來 風 ， 未 必 無 因 。 』
你 地 諗 下 點 解 龍 運 同 城 巴 幾 部 三 叉 戟 個 鐘 燈 都 係 虧 既 就 可 知 一 二 .
Article 13: (Request 3)
沒錯,但問題是當車長行使他[不准他人在車內影相]的權力時,可不可
以有些禮貌,就算是道理,也不代表要以惡劣的態度來表達.....
平心靜氣一句:[唔好影],總好過罵人.
落車鐘壞了,是不是應向乘客發洩呢......
渣新車不代表可以放縱,不代表可以罵人,不代表可以發脾氣....
渣新車理應心平氣和,冷靜和小心,如此激動,很易撞車的!
不過巴士迷影相也要自律,等車到了總站才影相,問過師傅才影....
(我其實也想問過他才影,無奈一落下層他已...)
等了一個多月終於乘了2100,但十分氣憤的目擊者
城巴香港仔代表
Alex Chan
Article 13: (Request 4)
我個次咪好彩,我在銅鑼灣同個司機講話上車影相,佢一口話ok.仲幫
我開燈.
Article 14:
Re: Scheduled Bus List
Andrew Siu (shiaw@netvigator.com) at Mon Dec 15 00:01, 1997 said:
100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) said:
> Thankyou very much for Ken to setup the Scheduled Bus List.
> I've observed the followings:
>
> 1)For 69X, why was there a ADAD241? (I tried to delete it but unsuccessful!)
> 2)AA49 appeared in both 88K and 224X. Which one is (or are both) correct?
> 3)I thought AA48 still 'swims' between 216M and 224X.
> 4)Can I include 'morning specials' such as DC4 on 101 every morning? (You've done so for other buses serving morning routes like 301)
> 5)Any A/C bus for CTB 5A at all?
>
> Once again, I want to thank Ken and all others who have contributed to the list. Keep it up!
>
> 100 Wong
I also found the following mistakes :
(1) 2A,95M use the same fleet no. 'S3M167'
Please make sure the correct fleet no. run on the correct route .
(2A use S3M167 instead of S3M238 in the last year . Now , 238 run on the 95M .)
(2) 60X just key-in '30' on the first box (what's that mean ? (joking?)
(3) 82M key-in License no. 'HB9217' . (Ken said that don't key-in any license no.)
Article 15:
Re: What's problem
Hanvas 漢 華 (hanvas@netvigator.com) at Sun Dec 14 22:10, 1997 said:
100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) said:
> Thanks to Henry Lee (master of Network Shuttle) for the photo of AD142 on 100D.
> Does anyone know what happened? Any announcement device on board? Was it a waste of resource for allocating a 3+2 seating bus for such a route?
>
> 100 Wong
From Hong Kong Vehicles Network Express of Network Shuttle:
I don't know what happened did the photo had. What is the problem of this photo?
Article 15: (Request 1)
Sorry! The photo was perfect! I was wondering what was a AD doing on rt.100D? Was it supposed to be served by 3AV exclusively?
100 Wong
Article 15: (Request 2)
The route itself is already a waste, no matter which type
of bus allocated (even AM).
--
DX 2437!
Article 16:
訓練雞載人?
BX2540 (plaxton@chevalier.net) at Sun Dec 14 23:48, 1997 said:
昨天晚上坐40,行經葵興時見到一部新訓練雞掛牌36.寫住暫停載客.
部車有幾個黃色lau既人.吾知在攪什麼?I think the G is G248 but I couldn't see
it's regis.no.
30x Buspage
Article 16: (Request 1)
Kodak GOLD 200 ( 35mm film for color prints )
請 問 有 咩 問 題 呀 ?
Article 17:
空穴來風， 未必無因。
肥魚 (fatfishz@netvigator.com) at Sun Dec 14 21:11, 1997 said:
空穴來風， 未必無因， 加因有條肥魚係道攪攪震。
點解 LF270 會行 641 呢？
原因係某日有條肥魚係牛頭角坐 641 （MB37）去灣仔三角教堂附近，
過o左灣仔華潤o個個必停既站之後， 就撳鐘落車， 落到樓下，
正準備落車之際， 抬頭一望， 咦！ 點解個鐘無著o架？ 於時即
刻再撳， 好綵個司機大佬到肯停車， 唔係由海富行返轉頭就大鑊
囉！
第二日， 呢條肥魚就打o左電話去中記投訴， 於是 MB37 就摺埋o左，
變o左做 LF270 喇！
成日放工都坐 641 既肥魚
Article 18:
Re: 登記字軌表要慎重
eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) at Sun Dec 14 21:09, 1997 said:
Colin Chang (kalim@netvigator.com) said:
> 我懷疑好些板友是否真的有依板主的指示來登記字軌表，各究竟
> 是否明白「字軌/掛牌」的定義。一入去「其他路線」一望，101
> 竟然有架字軌車係珍寶！我諗101連替字軌都無可能係珍寶啦，最
> 多係打仗車。但係打仗車又點可以登記落字軌表？
村長, LF264 (中國人x 保險廣告) 真係 101 字軌黎架, 我好多時都見佢.
> 另外，有些巴士只在路線出現一兩日，就俾人登記。好似LM4，我只係最近o向
> 42見佢行o左三幾日，都未夠板主定下o既一星期，又俾人登記o左
> 啦。我希望各位對於這個表的登記持一個較慎重o既態度，避免
> 「一見到就登記」
所以我都係登記自己果區o既線先, 起碼日日夜夜睇住, 決定到係咪掛牌/字軌.
其他區o既唔肯定就唔寫 lu.
Article 18: (Request 1)
LF264 只是101繁忙時間的攝車， 並唔可以叫字軌！ 字軌o既定義應該係每日由
朝到晚都係行住o個條線先叫字軌嘛。
講開LF264，就不如講埋呢架, LF300幾時變o左101字軌？
重有在369 一欄裏，請問呢o的係乜？（1FROMKMBC69X）
係咪即係一架由69X 掉過去369行的車！？乜可以o甘寫咩？
Article 18: (Request 2)
很多早晨特別線個個月的掛牌都唔同, 雖然我不知369是怎樣,
但'1 from KMB C69X'可能已是最好的形容方法.
(不過唔駛咁寫啦)
我覺得掛牌/字軌的定義未必是由朝行到晚, 只行早晚繁忙時間
都可是掛牌. 但LF264等就算行全日都唔叫字軌, 因為這是
額外班次.
其實905每日行一轉2A, 中記641行619, 九記641行101,
九記5A每日行5, 720行20等等都不應叫掛牌/字軌的.
Ricky Chan
P.S.3AV225荔廠車又點會掛牌27?! 幫幫手delete左佢啦.
Article 18: (Request 3)
咁我又想問下, 905 下晝行果架 VA24 (你條代表線 38 號o既字軌車) 又係咪
攝架? 我有次嚮北碼見部車攪 905 就覺得奇喇! 但呢部車真係日日下晝四點幾
經過西環.
Article 18: (Request 4)
VA24 已經不是38的字軌車了， 因為2+2 的DA 替了VA24 及LA15等位置。。
以你所講如果VA24在下晝行905的話，o甘呢個情況就同VA13一樣，
早上行完948之後就行111， 即VA24行完948 就行905 o甘！
Article 18: (Request 5)
o係字軌表上面o既規則係無寫到o的車行左幾耐先可以入落去個
表道. 我諗阿板主最好寫清楚呢個規則, 如果唔係的話, 日後新加
入o的板友就會唔知道有呢o的限制喇.
BTW, 我個人希望各位板友確定部車係果條線上面o既字軌/掛牌
先好填上去, 仲要係近期都仲係果隻. 唔好見到一兩次部車行個
條就話係掛牌/字軌, 因為部車可能係替車等等. 最好就肯定佢係
行開個條線, 同埋自己都係成日見/搭開, 先至 confirm. 我睇果
表上面, 都有唔少車係重覆o係唔同o既線. 例如 S3BL10, 佢分別
o係 1 同 2A 上面, 究竟佢係邊條線o既線掛牌先岩呢, 還是佢係
跳飛機呢? 咁樣對一o的唔熟o個條線o既人係好唔方便架.
最後希望各板友o係填表之前, 睇清楚, 諗清楚個規則先. 因為
好似規則上面寫咁樣, 你填左o的野上去要改番佢係好麻煩架.
Victor
Article 19:
城記Dart仔模型出o左啦!
Andrew Wong (wongbus@mailcity.com) at Sun Dec 14 20:37, 1997 said:
剛才去過70M,發現城記Dart仔已經出o左啦!價錢係$220(優惠價),
手工OK,但個樣唔係好似真車!而個電子板就根本唔似電子板!
Article 19: (Request 1)
請問個模係Corgi定係EFE造? 手工OK到那個程度,
比上次九記的好很多定是好少少? 先達同灣仔太原
街分別賣多少錢? 唔該.
Article 20:
Victories&Jubilants
Thomas Kwong (twlkwong@netvigator.com) at Sun Dec 14 20:19, 1997 said:
Hello, I would just like to know when KMB or CMB will dispose of their Victories and Jubilands and when CMB will get rid of their fleetlines.
Thanks!
Article 21:
今日所見(14/12)<<濠江版>>
Kevin Wong & Stanley (wphg19@netvigator.com) at Sun Dec 14 20:18, 1997 said:
1. 辛苦你 R214 在竹灣及大三巴斜路出現, 該兩處現時並沒有
任何巴士行走.
Kevin Wong & Stanley Yung
在濠江'的神吐'家中邊吃pizza邊上網現場報導 :P
Article 22:
Re: 今日所見(14/12)
安迪安 (h9703053@hkusua.hku.hk) at Sun Dec 14 23:50, 1997 said:
Wong Kai Yeung, 671 (yeung@powernethk.com) said:
> Pirro Cheung (y931204@netvigator.com) said:
> > 今日所見(14/12):
> > 1)CTB 875行182
> > 2)KMB AV344行E31
> > 3)CTB 623,629,527,577行969
> > 4)CMB LA18行780
> > 5)CTB 380行E21
>
> CMB:
> 6)DA49,DA50行42
> 7)DM19行8
>
> CTB:
> 8)211,229,234,236行98
> 9)388行E22
> 10)523,593行671
11) LM10 行 38
12) 1301 行 515
13) 圓頂寶行 25
14) 341 行 75
15) 933 行 95C
16) 427 行 72
Article 22: (Request 1)
今日所見(14/12):
CMB:
4)CMB LA18行780
6)DA49,DA50行42
7)DM19行8
11) LM10 行 38
13) 圓頂寶行 25
DL1 still on 112
CTB:
1)875行182
3)623,629,527,577行969
5)380行E21
8)211,229,234,236行98
9)388行E22
10)523,593行671
12) 1301 行 515
14) 341 行 75
15) 933 行 95C
16) 427 行 72
372, 595 on E22
KMB:
N198 on 48X (坐鴨仔過城隧!)
N??? (duple車身) on 87A
大量300及905掛牌AD走E31 (L?T基金, ??保險, 賣菜車...等廣告車)
LWB:
1 trident only on E31
Article 23:
[調查]你如何認九巴車?
F-stephen (c462a198@netvigator.com) at Sun Dec 14 19:10, 1997 said:
請問各位如何記一架九巴車,可使你在日後再見時,
能認得它呢?(包括型號及獨特特性等)
(1) 認車牌
(2) 認編號
(3) 認樣子
(4) 其他
目的:在前數天曾登'可惡!!細小的九巴編號'一文
受到多方批評,認為是無中生有,但請了解我
的感受,因為我記憶力差,記不了車牌號碼,
故對九巴這行動感失望,況且我見不少人記
車時均愛用編號去記,故想表達我的感受,
以及其他板友的看法,並無幫何一方之嫌.
(我最終希望九巴把它們還原,但知道是無可能了,
在此為此事嘆息)
(希望各位以上述四項回答,切勿問一些與
調查無關的問題,甚至過度批評該調查,因
為資料對我明白普遍巴士迷認九巴車的方式
,使我明白真正認車道理)
請踴躍回覆
F-stephen
Article 23: (Request 1)
若果明知道某部車係某條線o既掛牌/字軌車, 見到佢行都知道係佢啦!
我都係冇乜心機記車牌, 只係日日坐的話, 一定會記得. 同埋我比較喜歡靠
車身廣告辨認一架車, 廣告轉左的話又要重新適應過了....
(所以你同我講乜乜車牌o既車炒左, 我會一頭霧水, 你話咩咩廣告果架我就知.)
Article 23: (Request 2)
我建議閣下只去記車牌數字便可, 這也是九記抄車的方法。
如果連四位數都有記憶困難, 我都冇乜野可以幫你...
Piccolo
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Article 23: (Request 3)
Answer: 認車牌 & at the same time 認 Model.
The most important that if you want to take photos, need ask for that
Is that bus running in certain route But you can only tell fleet number?
Do you think that Captains or Regulators canhelp you?
Article 23: (Request 4)
先認樣子,唔係廣告車就認編號
Claymon
Article 24:
問:車牌 答:編號
F-stephen (c462a198@netvigator.com) at Sun Dec 14 18:53, 1997 said:
本人在乘車途中看以下九巴車種,但看不見
他們的編號,又沒有陳先生的巴士手冊,
希望各位有心人能解答:
(1) CT5087,CT6258(鴨車兩部)
(2) DE7730(短奧林匹克一部)
(3) HE7642
(4) CZ9917(短都城一部)
(5) FT144,FV7835,GT4264,GT9421,HA239
(空調縮水龍五部)
P.S. 我都不想打擾各位,但我真的看不清
楚其編號,而且無時間長企於一位置
看他們
F-stephen
Article 24: (Request 1)
Let me help you!
> (1) CT5087,CT6258(鴨車兩部)
CT5087(N339),CT6258(N348)
> (2) DE7730(短奧林匹克一部)
There is NO that registration number
> (3) HE7642
3AV260
> (4) CZ9917(短都城一部)
Ther is NO that registration
(5) FT144,FV7835,GT4264,GT9421,HA239
FT144(ADS6),FV7835(ADS30),GT4264(ADS71),GT9421(ADS98)
HA239(ADS162)
Pirro Cheung
AV134-----GX7696
574-----HD9422
Article 24: (Request 2)
eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:
> F-stephen (c462a198@netvigator.com) said:
> > 本人在乘車途中看以下九巴車種,但看不見
> > 他們的編號,又沒有陳先生的巴士手冊,
> > 希望各位有心人能解答:
> > (1) CT5087,CT6258(鴨車兩部)
>
> N339, N348
>
> > (2) DE7730(短奧林匹克一部)
> > (3) HE7642
>
> 3AV260
>
> > (4) CZ9917(短都城一部)
>
> BL13
>
> > (5) FT144,FV7835,GT4264,GT9421,HA239
>
> ADS6, 30, 71, 98, 162
>
> > (空調縮水龍五部)
>
> 你都係買番晒陳 sir 三本參考書啦, 係就係貴左少少, 不過做得巴士迷,
> 點少得佢呢....
I think you buy(The Fleet Dictory of Hong Kong Buses)by BSI
Publishing is better because that bus has a lot of registartion
number of 8 bus company
Pirro Cheung
AV134----GX7696
574------HD9422
Article 24: (Request 3)
咦?! 你又話自己仲未識認車o既?! 點解又會講得出又短龍呀,
又鴨車o既?! 又唔會話雞車呀, 十米 Olym 咁o既?! fo.O
Article 24: (Request 4)
我不識認車,並不是車型,而是獨立一部車
(例:我經常搭到FT144,它是298車,但若它被
調往91M,我則未必記得起它行298那種)
所以,我不希望九巴把編號縮細了
或者我是個白痴吧!
F-stephen
Article 24: (Request 5)
順便問埋,希望各位有心人繼續解答:
(1)GP7425
(2)HE8161
(3)HF4113
考試五科肥三科o既中七學生
Claymon :~~
Article 24: (Request 6)
I also want to ask CK5441--G27?, can anyone answer me?
Thanks very much!
Wan Chi Wai
3AV120
Article 24: (Request 7)
CK5441~(G270)
Article 25:
嘩!城巴Hompage又有......
Wiliam Fung (hk711997@netvigator.com) at Sun Dec 14 18:32, 1997 said:
小弟剛發現城巴Homepage內的'服務水平'及'前瞻掠影'已經用得!
而內容極攪笑，兼且極之吹水!大家快D去看看!
極希望城巴在Homepage內的一切'Promise'能實現的
William Fung
Article 25: (Request 1)
真係吹得好正!! 但係'路線圖'因咩事唔用得o既？
和 William Fung 對城巴有同一寄望(同上)的 671
Article 25: (Request 2)
睇左之後
諗起份東方日報
裡面的內容係唔係搵個以前寫東記茶樓條友寫架
極盡吹水之能事
小西灣城巴站站長
林文放
Article 26:
Re: 城記41A是不是已改路
eriC (dart@netvigator.com) at Sun Dec 14 19:22, 1997 said:
諸葛亮 (s975318@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk.) said:
> 今日看見一架有客0既41A路過天樂里,各位知不知道41A是否改路呢.
因為今日港島區百萬行途經介乎樂活道與藍塘道之間的一段大坑道,
所以警方將該段路面封閉,以方便參加者.
因此41A在百萬行舉行期間改經天樂里,軒尼詩道.
今日行完百萬行,而家好[支力]o既
eriC
Article 27:
又走雞啦！-_-
Joseph Ho (kchojbl@school.net.hk) at Sun Dec 14 17:23, 1997 said:
依家我o係北角o既Internet Cafe玩緊net，呢個計劃我琴晚已經諗定
，不過點解會o係呢個時間？睇o下下文啦。
事關我做完功課，而我o既School Net a/c又玩到over time，所以我
就要出街玩。
下晝三點五十幾分，我打電話去我個巴士迷同學屋企，諗住約埋佢出
o黎，點知佢話比我聽DL1今日又行112，佢叫我去影相，咁我就伸個
頭出窗口外面睇o下係中記定係九記時間，點知我個頭一伸到出去，
就見到DL1，於是我就即刻話比我同學聽，不過我冇相機(比呀媽收埋
o左)，所以我就叫我同學帶佢架相機即刻落o黎，點知一落到o黎，架
DL1都已經唔見o左，但係架VA36(我o既代表車)就o係到，雖然我同學
架相機冇zoom，但係都唔理啦，照影！
Joseph
Article 28:
有幾多架CTB用Combined 牌布?
牌布迷PTC (bc_cly@stu.ust.hk) at Sun Dec 14 16:44, 1997 said:
前兩日Joseph Ho
之柴灣道所見
所見o既CTB#837係用Combined 牌布(即係用version s1大楷牌布
駁大小楷牌布).
8月o個陣我o係金鐘木睇837攪牌由大楷金鐘木攪到大小楷小西灣.
請問是否所有用大楷牌布都係combined?
有冇人見過其他CTB用combined牌布?
我都見過232行85用過.
我不時都見到E22 o既'攝車'都用version s1,唔知佢o地有冇combined?
牌布迷PTC
Article 29:
904, 905中九時間表
Kai Pan (markkp@school.net.hk) at Sun Dec 14 15:43, 1997 said:
想要904, 905中九時間表﹗﹗
If possible ,please e-mail me!
Thanks!!
落馬洲--皇崗穿梭巴士 司長
Kai Pan
Article 29: (Request 1)
點解905有普通車(熱狗)o既?
Click Here.
PTC
Article 29: (Request 2)
> 905 都唔係新西隧線, 當然有熱狗喇.
我o係西隧開線第一日去坐914，有人上車干時問個司機：「點解唔係全部冷氣車o既？」
個司機就講笑話：「全部冷氣車，公司執笠啦！」
Joseph
Article 30:
火燒巴士事件
Dickson2 (dickson2@macau.ctm.net) at Mon Dec 15 13:30, 1997 said:
<<澳門日報消息>>
在前幾天晚上, 一架倫敦某巴士公司的'平治 811D'在倫敦街頭
被德里新教徒和天主教徒對打時燒燬, 全車連車身難以認出來.
Dickson2
