19981130







Articles on 30th November, 1998.

Today's Articles: 41.



Articles' Numbers: (19981130_01-41)








Article 1:


[TBH廣告]新巴翻油色,都普躉 + 1091



Edward Hong (edhong@netvigator.com) from hhtck006195.netvigator.com at Sun Nov 29 21:14, 1998 said:



The Bus Homepage 更新:




1. 新 巴 翻 油 色 DA31, 44, 50, 59, 60, 77, 79 VA8




2. 新 巴 都 普 躉




3. 每 周 大 相 - 1091









歡 迎 進 入 : http://home.netvigator.com/~edhong









The Bus Homepage




Edward Hong



Article 1: (Request 1)


> NWFB1010 (bonopun@netteens.net) said:




> 張DA44何解看不到?









因我沒有upload上去... :p




(已upload番啦!)









Edward Hong



Article 2:


Re: Please reply to all my passages



Taffy Kwok (h9805662@hkusua.hku.hk) from ws55.utinet.com at Mon Nov 30 11:41, 1998 said:



> Citybus 291 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) said:




> Please reply to all my passages as the topic are well designed & debatable. You would enjoy a lot of fun when replying to my passages.




>




> Citybus 291, who only writes the best passages.




但係我唔覺得好Fun囉﹐因為有很多人針對你﹐你的文變成罵戰的根源﹒




(以上純熟我的觀點﹐希望不要引起什麼罵戰)









不想見到罵戰的




Taffy Kwok



Article 2: (Request 1)


個人主意及篇見文章至令閱讀者憤怒,絕對無落趣。




跟據小弟觀看所得,超過8成罵戰介由十兄弟之文章開始。我支持




Walter兄之建意。



Article 2: (Request 2)


請問板主: 佢咁樣係咪再次違規灌水呢?














Mike NG(CMB-LF126)



Article 2: (Request 3)


喂!大學生!按一按Enter不會死吧?>:(









4. 板友操守




===========




4.1 本板嚴禁張貼任何人身攻擊的字句。




4.2 本板並非罵戰專用看板,故本板嚴禁張貼刻意挑起罵戰、態度欠佳及具




有挑釁性之文章。板友貼文時亦需注重網絡上的一般禮儀。




4.3 板友在未得板主知情並同意的情況下,嚴禁張貼假借板主之權力訂立規




則等文章。




4.4 板友需對自己張貼的文章負責,並且互相尊重。




4.5 板友不能強行要求任何板友對自己的文章作出回應。




4.6 板友申請賬戶時,表示板友完全認同並遵守本貼文守則。




4.7 會員在 香港巴士討論區 之賬戶只可以作個人用途,賬戶嚴禁轉賬或借予




他人使用,違者將永久撒銷本板會員資格。




4.8 板友需要禮貌地對待其他板友。









明啦?









火氣旺盛的炎邪火月



Article 3:


[廣告] 新巴士討論區開張



s3m186 (96008318@plink.cityu.edu.hk) from proxy2.cityu.edu.hk at Mon Nov 30 12:32, 1998 said:



由今天起, 各巴士迷又多一個地方討論巴士, 它就是《九巴230x




巴士討論區》; 網址如下:









http://www.InsideTheWeb.com/mbs.cgi/mb241223




Article 4:


好多孖位豪/鷹行970呀



Albion (PSKY) (h9714900@hkusua.hku.hk) from hkusud.hku.hk at Mon Nov 30 09:40, 1998 said:



好多孖位豪/鷹行970呀!有VA54,VA55,VA63,DA86,DA87,DA88,DA90等等.



Article 4: (Request 1)


> DR4834 (h9810424@hkusua.hku.hk) said:




> 仲有銀豪呀!









都唔知發乜o野神經,尋日竟然有VA63行970……




係唔係因為原本用呢D車o既線已經改用躉,




所以970至得此惠澤……









LX253



Article 4: (Request 2)


其實係因為VA的油缸夠大, 唔洗好似DA要在下午番廠入油.




所以黃廠的VA將會落俾970.



















Louis



Article 4: (Request 3)


最慘就係38,雖然轉哂全冷,但突然一夜之間5架2+2 DA/VA




都掉哂去行970。話佢服務倒退又唔係,進步又唔係。




其實970 用哂o的2+2 座位o既車,都唔知夠唔夠坐!




唔知970 有冇加到車呢?









From




VA56 Gohan









38 字軌車情報



Article 4: (Request 4)


可能 Trident 行唔到 970關係, 而新車中唯有銀豪和較新的龍合適




行走這條線! 而且無理由用德仔! 所以我想新記派這些車行 970的原




因.









今早在澳門某工業大廈被部電梯飛站的 B-2051



Article 5:


Re: 606 城九派車時間表(更新版)



LF291 (wang5@hknet.com) from 202.67.232.154 at Sun Nov 29 23:54, 1998 said:



> HU6455 (makhome@netteens.net) said:









資料庫那張時間表己經過時了...









九巴 606 開車時間表已經改動過, 由九八年四月起已增加一部掛牌,




九巴詳細時間表請看這裏









至於城巴開車時間表大約如下:




平日





小西灣開 班次 彩雲開 班次




0615




0630-0739 11-12 0751-0900 9-10




0911-1020 9-10 1031-1141 9-10




1157-1301 16 1317-1421 16




1437-1600 12-13 1611-1720 9-10




1731-1841 9-10 1852-2000 9-10




假日




小西灣開 班次 彩雲開 班次




0630-0734 16 0750-0854 16




0910-1019 11-12 1030-1139 11-12




1150-1254 10-11 1310-1414 10-11




1430-1558 13-14 1609-1717 11-12




1728-1837 11-12 1849-2000 11-12










打到傻左的智叔




巴士隨想站



Article 5: (Request 1)


> Raymond (a1212122@netvigator.com) said:




> 去呢度咪知囉(註:中=城)









應該係:




去呢度









> P.S.Ricky兄,宜家唔係中九啦,應該係城九,希望你可以改番佢啦









點改?









Ricky Chan



Article 5: (Request 2)


> HU6455 (makhome@netteens.net) said:




>




>




> Why I can't open?









Sorry,我貼唔到,你試下從以下途徑:




在本板主頁進入資料庫,去時間表,再入606中九時間表就睇到



Article 6:


Please feel fortunate to have AC service



Citybus 291 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from ustsu18-nc2.ust.hk at Mon Nov 30 09:48, 1998 said:



I have to say everyone living in the following area, that is, with a lot of or even only AC buses service should feel fortunate to have so many good AC routes to take:









(1) Stanley, with all 6 series between there & Central, and 73, to Wah Fu, are AC routes & fast, comfortable. (So 66, 63 & 65 must be changed to AC routes immediately after the completion of Carmel Road).









(2) Kennedy Town, with all Citybus 5 series routes & 10 & 10X full AC, so they do not need to suffer the hot streets & uncomfortable buses. (That's why the TD cuts CMB 10 to Citybus, so people do not need to suffer the oldest buses in HK on 10).









(3) Tung Chung, with all routes to Kowloon & NT & of course HK Island full AC, so they do not need to suffer the bad air in tunnels (Cheung Ching Tunnel at least) and can retain the best looking when flying on the highways (as no litter nor dirty winds nor dusts going into the bus). (So E11 must not be cut to KMB nor CMB, as a HKBDB boardmate suggests, as it would change to full hotdog service for 'price reduction' and greatly dercease its amount of passengers).









(4) Tin Shui Wai, with all routes going through Route 3 all AC (and 276, 276P) and other routes with at least 50% AC buses running on them, so they do not need to suffer the dirty air in Tai Lam Tunnel.









(5) Victoria Road, with 5B & 47A full AC, so residents there can enjoy the comfortable trips on 47A (the seats on Jit Luen Volvo B6 are the most comfortable among non-Airport buses).









(6) Wong Chuk Hang, with all routes, including NWFB 78 (except 95B) full AC, so they can enjoy the most comfortable, fast service.









(7) Breamer Hill, with all routes except 27 full AC (in fact 27 was designated as full AC route, but there are some hotdogs because of lack of Darts), so people can enjoy the fast, comfortable trip from there to other places.









because there are still many area with no AC bus serviec at all, so passengers have to suffer poor hotdog service:









(1) Shing Mun Tunnel, with all KMB routes full hotdog, thus passengers are forced to inhale the toxic gases in tunnel.









(2) Ho Man Tin (don't say there is no need for AC service because there are HOS estates & polics quarters that people living them are rich enough to afford AC bus service but not enough for a car), with all routes except 109 full hotdog, thus passengers have to suffer the slow speed & great noise of hotdogs. (That's why 100/911R/M1 Wong suggests the cutting of some Ho Man Tin rotues to Citybus or NWFB).









(3) Tseung Kwan O, with most routes full hotdog, so passengers have to suffer the slow speed of hotdogs running on Po Lam Road, and KMB 690, making people have to suffer the smoke in tunnels. (That's why I suggests the cutting of 690 to Citybus, thus reducing fare & intorducing full AC service, so passengers do not need to suffer the bad air in tunnel).









(4) HKUST, with lots of hotdogs running on 91 & 91M, hence making the fare of the routes sky high (as the hotdogs are large in expenditure but small in income, so AC buses have to subsidize the hotdogs. If they are all aC, then the fare can be decreased). The trip is slow also, and the worst case is the BL running from HKUST to Pik Uk at 2km/h. (So I recommended the cutting of losing KMB 91 to Citybus & change to Citybsu 291 with a lot of sectional fares).









(5) To Kwa Wan & Hung Hom, with a lot of hotdog routes running tere but very few AC routes, so passnegers have to suffer long, bitter trip on hotdogs & inhaling exhauses on the streets. (That's why cutting KMB 5C to Citybus & change to Citybus 205 is needed).









I hope everyone can feel fortunate for having full AC service as there are still some area in HK without AC service at all.









Citybsu 291



Article 6: (Request 1)


> Gakei! (gakei@netvigator.com) said:




> 如果響應 Walter o既呼籲o既就唔好回呢篇文啦.




> 保持 HKBDB 寧靜, 人人有責, 由呢篇文自動消失吧!




>




But you replied to the passage, so you have no right to say so.









Citybus 291



Article 6: (Request 2)


佢又無話支唔支持,你理得佢丫!









重有,你係乜水呀?人地回唔回你的文駛唔駛入紙過你申請呀?









火氣旺盛的炎邪火月




(咪惹起本大爺把火,否則........)



Article 7:


Re: 問3D及3B派車



lun (alan680@hkabc.net) from 202.82.45.65 at Mon Nov 30 00:12, 1998 said:



> 人一個 (yky@netteens.net) said:




> 如題




>




> 3B:




>




> 3D:




>




> thank









In Tsing Ming festival and Tuen Ng Festival, you can see N,BL, M, 3BL and 3N, also 3AV in route 3D.



Article 7: (Request 1)


就等我呢個前字軌表負責人現身說法吧:









3B掛牌:




冷馬:




AV410(HR8741), AV411(HR8916), AV417(HS8568), AV418(HR9569)









熱狗:




S3N117(DP5277), S3N121(DP5782), S3N100(DP4974),




S3N164(DW6745), S3N122(DP5888), S3N130(DP5512).



Article 7: (Request 2)


你想問D乜先, 以前o個D 定而家o個D呀?



Article 8:


尋廣告車



Jess (c5013830@hkbu.edu.hk) from 203.80.106.81 at Mon Nov 30 01:00, 1998 said:



尋以下廣告車, 現時行那條路線?(有寫者除外) 廣告是否已甩?









新寶城:3N102(1A),3N121(3X),AV214(93K),AV221(671)




牽晴間:ADS41(64K),ADS48(64K),ME34




錦囊IXUS:DA52,DS55




樂信感冒靈:ML8(690)




珮夫人止咳露:3N103(1A),LF128(前10)




民安保險:LF211(前10)




鴻運地產:LV62(前21),LV153,LV165(84)




國泰-北美五區直航服務:AA12(前M1)




金稻米酒:N198(前73A)




多謝幫忙




Jess



Article 8: (Request 1)


首先牽情間廣告既巴士有ADS47,ADS86(已甩),BL33,ME20,




ME30同埋ME34,而ADS41同ADS48都係九巴原色車。




ADS48目前行64K,ME34早排有行過73,不過近排就唔知去




行邊條線,ADS41則冇見行64K好耐。




呢架車早前有行過31M









仲有一D已上廣告或甩廣告車資料如下:




AD192=甩聖安娜月餅廣告




3AV116=上煤氣廣告




AD48=上雅蘭廣告(Banana)









Tony(S3M61)




(九巴)70討論區



Article 8: (Request 2)


sorry! i had forget is it ADS41?




But, 64K had two vehicles served with such adv.,




ADS47 on 234X last friday (6:55pm at Mei Foo)




Jess at WLB508



Article 8: (Request 3)


DA52 已油上新巴色




DA55 廣告仍在, 三個月會點就唔知.(後備車)




已經在小西灣廠...




LV163 一直無上鴻運地產, LV62,LV165 廣告則仍在.




LV62 做過 82 三車 (原DS26) , 但最近又甩左.




LV163, 165 仍是 84 字軌




唔使 ^_^









發覺 830 (保心安油) 多數行 102 的智叔




新巴非空調巴士行車証



Article 9:


Re: 新巴仍雖努力!



DM12(ER7054) (clement@netteens.net) from mp0416.hknet.com at Sun Nov 29 23:54, 1998 said:



> Sunba (akyl@rubens.its.unimelb.edu.au) said:




> 26/11/98 華潤百貨 銅鑼灣 1540-1900 星期五




> 之2,2A班次:




> 時間 車號 前車分隔 (分鐘)




> 1557 2 ML82




> 1612 2 LF160 15




> 1628 2 LV137 16




> 1646 2 ML37 18




> 1646 2 DS19 0




> 1710 2 DS18 24




> 1741 2 ML78 31




> 1741 2 DS5 0




> 1756 2 LF113 15




> 1817 2 ML37 21




> 1834 2 MB33 17




> 1845 2 LV62 11




> 1854 2 DS19 9




> 時間 車號 前車分隔 (分鐘)




> 1542 2A DL36




> 1551 2A DL42 9




> 1557 2A DM27 6




> 1606 2A DM24 9




> 1620 2A ML21 14




> 1627 2A DL13 7




> 1635 2A DL27 8




> 1646 2A DL38 11




> 1656 2A DL29 10




> 1731 2A DL36 35




> 1734 2A DL31 3




> 1755 2A DL42 21




> 1809 2A DM27 14




> 1813 2A DM24 4




> 1823 2A ML21 10




> 1825 2A DL13 2




> 1832 2A DL27 7




> 1837 2A DL38 5




> 1848 2A DL31 11




> 1900 2A DL29 12




> During peak hours passengers still have to wait for over 20-30 mins for a bus, NWFB should be more flexible and react more swiftly to changing traffic conditions.




>




> Traffic congestion in Wah Chai Ferry should be one reason because similar figures are obtained for 25A/C.




> NWFB may consider special departures from Henessey Road.




>




> Sunba









嘩!你都好多時間喎!你起邊到望架?




回應返先!高士威道經常塞車,班次有誤點也是難怪的!




以2A為例:




1656 2A DL29 10




1731 2A DL36 35




在16:30-17:30高士威道應該好塞




所以有35分鐘之差!




再以2號為例




1741 2 ML78 31




1741 2 DS5 0




同樣地,16:30-17:30塞死0左




所以有30分鐘之差




並且看到,兩班車同時出現,明顯是追更的了!



Article 9: (Request 1)


> Sunba (akyl@rubens.its.unimelb.edu.au) said:




> I was standing outside 華潤百貨, where 102/106 turn into Causeway Road and Moreton Terrace buses turned into Paul Con.




> I did not object to that...i said in my thread traffic congestion is one main reason. But what i really want to say is NWFB can try to do something about it.









原來係你呀, 搭 106 回家時見你抄車抄得好辛苦喎 ^_^









可以做得乜呀, 放工時間基本上軒尼詩道加中環已經塞到傻,




仲要係星期五, 根本除非巴士識飛, 如果唔係根本城巴做都愛莫能助.









而好明顯二號, 2A 踢車情況十分嚴重, 第一轉同第二轉咁大差異.




所以我覺得新巴城巴已經盡左力.









智叔




新巴非空調巴士行車証



Article 10:


Re: 彌敦道,旺角道



德褔5D (97089033d@polyu.edu.hk) from 202.82.249.91 at Sun Nov 29 23:48, 1998 said:



> 阿童 (wmanlai@netvigator.com) said:




> 為何104及300號可直接由彌敦道北行轉右入旺角道,而1A, 9號及203E




> 則不可?如因交通問題,104及300號也理應此不可行。









根據多年前的九巴內部通告,只有 B1, 95, 203, 300 先可以用彌敦道




右轉入旺角道,你見 104 是不是新巴車?他們是偷雞轉的。




但在深夜都有唔少師傅偷雞轉,冇計啦!兜一兜新填地街都幾 o徒 時間




,我試過黃昏搭 1A 兜新填地街用了半個鐘,平日繁忙時間閒閒地都用




成 15 分鐘,所以你都唔怪得新巴師傅偷雞呀!














5D 德褔花園 往 紅磡 (循環線)



Article 10: (Request 1)


仲有B1,95,203,N216都係o係彌敦道右轉旺角道.









不過有時o係零辰時份,有o的車都會o係度'偷雞'轉o既.




(我見過有1A,3C,9,87D,93K)









至於點解唔准呢?據知係運輸署認為彌敦道路面狹窄,




唔容許咁多巴士停o係個路口等轉右.









由下午3點On-line到而家o既藍田站長(前GB2444,FX8032)



Article 10: (Request 2)


因為運吉署限制彌敦道右轉旺角道的巴士路線數目, 所以有D 線可以




咁轉, 而其他線須經亞皆老街及新填地街.









HB 916



Article 11:


究竟我有無被九巴53車長騙?



88K (b9505044@ln.edu.hk) from jupiter.lnc.hk at Sun Nov 29 23:58, 1998 said:



今天乘九巴 53由嶺南大學到屯門新墟,




但本人入了$3.00,被車長大叫去邊?




及立刻付$4.20。




註:三日前,我問車長是$3.00。









另:1)乘53由屯市到嶺大,要幾錢?




2)星期日,53是否比平日多車?



Article 11: (Request 1)


> Jess (c5013830@hkbu.edu.hk) said:




> 屯市<->嶺南:$4.2.(三聖<->元朗$4.2)




> $3是在輕鐵未有專區是的分段:兆康-三聖(以當日價錢估價, 應是$3)




> Jess









正確的分段是 (青龍頭 <-> 虎地)




所以的確是$4.20 沒錯




而 三聖 往 元朗東 , 是單向收費, 沒有雙向的, 而價錢為$4.30




還貴了一毫子的 ^_^



Article 12:


Re: 【代筆】又見龍運欄屍



怪俠一枝梅 (bebeto@vtech.net) from 203.80.114.134 at Mon Nov 30 01:48, 1998 said:



> 炎邪火月 (hsbt@netvigator.com) said:




> 以下內容來自板友Dennis Law,由小弟代為發放:




>




> 昨晚(28/11)返到香港,在乘車去東涌轉車返家時,竟比我見到:




>




> 過檔龍運的欄屍!(真好彩!^_^)




>




> 昨晚所見,有兩架(前AN15/17)行S62同S63。另有三架係東涌廠。




>




> Dennis Law (炎邪火月代筆)




>




> P.S.搞錯呀!坐S61坐正架豪,E21又係豪,點解無躉坐架?>_<









龍運過檔LANCE, 已服務約四天了




行走S61,S62及S63









S51 則這兩天有TRIDENT 攝場




E41 則有豪華板TRIDENT 坐 (HU295)



Article 12: (Request 1)


但今天小弟見一部龍運Lance在青衣北橋口駛過,




沒路線牌,車上有數人,似操車多D.









第一次親眼見龍運Lance的




Joe~305字



Article 13:


8X 瘋狂派車!



Sunba (akyl@rubens.its.unimelb.edu.au) from 202.82.244.132 at Sun Nov 29 22:21, 1998 said:



26/11/98 華潤百貨 銅鑼灣 1540-1900 星期五




之8X(東行)班次:




時間 車號 前車分隔 (分鐘)




1543 8X 400




1552 8X 475 9




1554 8X 836 2




1554 8X 407 0




1600 8X 817 6




1602 8X 858 2




1602 8X 809 0




1609 8X 405 7




1613 8X 683 4




1615 8X 852 2




1619 8X 844 4




1621 8X 813 2




1626 8X 837 5




1628 8X 824 2




1629 8X 2500 1




1631 8X 399 2




1631 8X 829 0




1636 8X 819 5




1637 8X 873 1




1642 8X 846 5




1643 8X 845 1




1644 8X 827 1




1659 8X 831 15




1701 8X 874 2




1710 8X 832 9




1710 8X 649 0




1712 8X 626 2




1718 8X 828 6




1721 8X 870 3




1724 8X 860 3




1726 8X 872 2




1729 8X 691 3




1734 8X 606 5




1745 8X 839 11




1749 8X 474 4




1751 8X 665 2




1753 8X 400 2




1755 8X 407 2




1759 8X 858 4




1800 8X 863 1




1800 8X 813 0




1801 8X 475 1




1811 8X 836 10




1818 8X 852 7




1823 8X 837 5




1824 8X 809 1




1826 8X 845 2




1833 8X 817 7




1834 8X 599 1




1841 8X 405 7




1844 8X 844 3




1850 8X 829 6




1850 8X 819 3




1857 8X 873 7




1857 8X 827 0




1859 8X 846 2




1901 8X 874 2




Not a single 8X is full and only three of them have passengers standing. Rational boardmates would know which




company causes the traffic jam in King's Road.




If anyone can say 8X is still a profitable route, i challenge him/her to give me further evidence!




This is a new obseveration: Citybus is also good at turning




profitable routes to loss-making.




Citybus is simply 走火入魔!









Sunba



Article 13: (Request 1)


> Route 99 (ayeung@vol.net) said:




>




> Your comparison seems to be unfair to Route 8X.




> You have assumed that no more passengers will get on Route 8X after 華潤百貨.




No, i did not make that assumption. I assumed there should be passengers boarding 8X on King's Road, but whether those can fill the bus (or to 75% capacity) is another matter.









>




> As you have to realise that Route 8P will take its way to the Island Eastern Corridor




> after Victoria Park, as a result, more passengers are expected to have loaded on




> Route 8P at Causeway Bay.




>




> However, Route 8X has kind of a wider target of passengers as the route keeps its way




> to Tin Hau, Fortress Hill and North Point while I expect there will be some more passengers




> to get on board along the King's Road.




>




> Based on the opinion, a fair comparison should be made when a test be done outside




> 499 King's Road on Route 8X. If most of the buses of Route 8X are below 75% of its




> capacity at 499 King's Road at peak hours, then I'll assume your comparison is correct.




> If most of the buses are 75% loaded, then I think the number of buses allocated to the




> route is appropriate.




>




> By the way, although the traffic jam at King's Road has relieved a bit, a better arrangement




> can still be done over there beside cutting buses.




> As my suggestion as months ago, buses travelling along the East bound towards North Point




> Ferry Pier should divert by making a Left Turn at North Point Road and turns into Java Road.




> If this is arranged, the volume of buses that needs to line up at the traffic signals near the




> North Point tram terminal will be significantly reduced, as Route 10, 23, 27, 38, 41A, 42, 63,




> 65, etc. can use Java Road.




>




>




> Route 99









You see, what i said is only couple of 8X have standing passengers, most other have only half of the seats occupied.




Quite a few have only 20 passengers or less! I think i was quite fair to 8X not persenting this side of the picture




in my previous thread. Do you really think there are so many passengers along King's Road to fill the buses to 75% capacity?









Sunba



Article 14:


今日牛河



Pirro Cheung (y931204@netvigator.com) from imscache01a.netvigator.com at Sun Nov 29 21:19, 1998 said:



今日見得閒,相約o左板友卿姐EV4019及Kwan去港島牛河,目的是去




影新巴都普蠆!









今早10時出發,先到紅磡隧道口影車,等了10分鐘,便見到新巴1091




(冇波浪紋)行101,我和卿姐EV4019都影到相(好o野),由於今日是星




期日的關係,冇隧道職員干涉,上算順利!









在等Kwan其間,我和卿姐EV4019看到城巴的102有意阻礙新巴106上客




將車停在車站10分鐘都不開走,令新巴106不能上客,到了11時,便




乘3AD58(104)往灣仔乘8P









到了灣仔碼頭,便見到1001行8P,便立即上車,用了4個字便到小西灣




之後便行過新巴廢車場,見到大量DS,ML,LF已被拆走引擎,又見到新




巴T101在場內,我們又去柴廠,見到2部DM真是上了新巴色,又有5部




都普蠆在柴廠內...









之後行過常安街,見到DL2,ML2,其後見到870行780,起初Kwan不想




搭870,在我和卿姐EV4019要他上車,他也上了車~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~









到了中環,見到有一部都普蠆在行走,但不知道行什麼路線,在這時




我們到哈X斯加油,其後到天星碼頭影上了新巴色的DC6,7之後回立法




局等新巴都普蠆!









過了一會,新巴都普蠆終於出現,原來是3001行691,我和卿姐EV4019




乘新巴都普蠆出港澳碼頭影新巴都普蠆!









我們在港澳碼頭影新巴都普蠆時,見到巴士迷的敗類---肥Paul,但最




後我們乘新巴都普蠆到藍田散Band走人!!









鍾意o左個女同事,但冇勇氣對她說的-_-




Pirro Cheung




574---HD9422



Article 14: (Request 1)


成日都係咁喇.




其實我都唔明新巴點解唔派職員在隧道口搶客?




日頭反而有一兩個, 但無作用...




而夜晚一個都無, 唔通跟 Office Hour ?




請一兩個職員在夜晚睇住, 就算搶唔到客都唔好被城記放肆嘛.




我都搭過, 無野呀~~~














已經被某城巴職員認得我專搭 106 的智叔




亙聯字軌/掛牌網



Article 14: (Request 2)


捉我上870,你地好大膽!!




不過講真870涼(陰)風陣陣




好彩我立即趕到,唔係你地有排煩啦!




老餅收銀你都鍾意,你D品味...




講笑呀^_^









Kwan



Article 15:


再攪:全港距離最近的兩個巴士站



DR4834 (h9810424@hkusua.hku.hk) from hkusud.hku.hk at Mon Nov 30 12:14, 1998 said:



上一次有板友攪過 但是我認為沒有距離 只是說那個近哪個近是不夠




代表性 所以我再攪:









測距方法:




(當然可以用把尺去度!)




(1)得知自己坐緊的巴士的長度




(2)當巴士開動時 看下兩個巴士站相距的車位




(3)車位數 X 車長 = 距離了









本人所得:




坐部城記2XX (大概十米啦)




兩個站距五個車位




即是相距五十米 (很近)









那個站就是柏道英華女校站與衛城道交界站



Article 15: (Request 1)


哈哈!首先多謝你回應先,我就唔客氣加返D『客觀條件』喇……









1.香港島薄扶林道,中華基督教薄扶林墳場同碼麗病理學大樓(站名好似係『碧荔道』)




上週六坐緊部LV,部車只係用o左八秒時間行o左兩個站o既距離,大約六至七個車位。









好肚餓的




LX253



Article 16:


Re: 新記呢句口號點解?



Eddie Lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) from ntproxy1.polyu.edu.hk at Mon Nov 30 12:18, 1998 said:



DR4834 (h9810424@hkusua.hku.hk) said:




> We must stop meeting like this?




>




> 什麼meeting要stop? 仲要must stop?




> 咁this又代表什麼?









'This' 相信係指中巴時代o既疏落班次.




全句意思大致係「我地o既巴士唔會再好似以前咁同大家見面」,




暗示巴士班次會更頻密.









(請留意其對應中文版「一陣見!」)









---




本月金句:「巴士狂熱」還您自由 (最後一日用)



Article 17:


新巴躉上斜好嘈呀!



Route 99 (ayeung@vol.net) from 202.88.2.245 at Mon Nov 30 09:26, 1998 said:



新巴N8線有時行新巴躉, 上耀東斜路時, 噪音差不多同 LV上




耀東斜路一樣









......唉,我點搵周公呀?









希望N8只行 DA 或 LA啦.









99號線 Ross 仔



Article 17: (Request 1)


城記21xx躉果部引擎都好嘈




究竟點解?



Article 18:


Re: 問ATR39-44車牌



DR4834 (h9810424@hkusua.hku.hk) from hkusud.hku.hk at Mon Nov 30 11:22, 1998 said:



ATR39 HW8970




ATR40 HW9389




ATR41 HX859




ATR42 HX1961




ATR43 HX2449




ATR44 HX6756



Article 19:


Re: Cityflyer模型三問



conan, AR7599 (conanckw@hkstar.com) from ip-48-9.dialup.hkstar.com at Mon Nov 30 11:21, 1998 said:



> William (william2@ihug.co.nz) said:




> 1﹒請問Cityflyer無英文字模型編號是否 44501?




> 2﹒這模型(有証書)80N 賣多少錢?




> 3﹒44502 賣完未?




> Thanks in advance!









1. 是




2.198. (無証書)




3. 賣完(但聽說可以訂)



Article 20:


九巴令我變成長頸鹿+沙甸魚.....



Alex Chan (alexki@netvigator.com) from jupiter.lnc.hk at Mon Nov 30 02:51, 1998 said:



話說今天回嶺南, 我乘970去到長沙灣(麗閣村)轉乘67X, 時間大約是




19:42, 我送了一架67X(EL7111)車尾, 唯有等下一班, 怎料.....









一等, 再等, 三等, 在過了6架970, 4架E21, ??架102&112, 等到118




由九巴時段變城巴時段, 及看到第四架近乎企滿人的60X和4架59A後,




我還是等不到車的, 直至半過小時以後, 即20:16, 我才看見一架爆




滿的67X(GJ3303)到站, 由於我要趕著回去, 所以在無選擇下上了車.




先做完長頸鹿再做沙甸魚......@_@









根據時間表, 這時候應是12-20分鐘一班車的. 但這時正是晚上居民




回屯門的「繁忙時間」, 理應不會是20分一班, 而且這次我等了30分




鐘以上才有車, 加上巴士到長沙灣時已爆滿, 這很明顯是有一班車是




消失了.









其實如果因為某些原因(如壞車), 是不是應該找出車輛替代以維持班




次, 要是事出突然, 來不及找車, 站長是不是有責任去對班次作出




適當的調整, 如把下一班車提早些開出, 這總比cut一班車好.









另外, 對於長途的巴士, 巴士公司是不是應投放更多車量行走呢?在




平日繁忙時間, 要企都是情有可原(但也是不太應該的), 但在假日,




巴士理應充裕(因為有不少線是假日停開), 而且乘客也會比平日少,




要一家大小老幼站著在擠迫的車廂內,由九龍直至屯門, 這樣可以說




是優質巴士服務嗎?









相信市民對今日巴士公司的要求, 不會是那種「聊勝於無」,「有車




比你上就算」的服務, 而是要求舒適的服務, 至少是有位可以坐,




否則談什麼「日日進步」呢?









又例如「罰企水塘豪」, 買入空調巴士是為了改善和提供更舒適的服




務, 但卻加企位, 也許某巴管理層認為由「熱狗企位」變成「冷馬企




位」是一種「進步」,但在乘客而言, 這種絕對是自欺欺人的所為.









我也懶得去和九巴反映了, 反正他們是「意見接收,態度依舊」,這




些事例在討論區內已有板友談過(如九巴發出的回應信是千篇一律),




我不重覆了. 我只希望九巴真正去做一些改善服務的事, 買新車只




是其次, 最重要和起碼的, 是不要在正常情況下脫班, 讓乘客有位可




坐.














Alex Chan.



Article 20: (Request 1)


其實類似情形在觀塘區亦時常出現. 以乘客量較多的Rt.16為例, 在




下班繁忙時間常因為旺角塞車而導致班次失準, 但從未見過九巴會




踢空車往九龍城/牛頭角返回藍田以作應變. 其他路線, 如Rt.1A和




93K等亦有類似情形.









同時, 九巴是在最非不得巳的情況下, 才會從其他路線臨時拉扶車




輛和司機來跳飛機.









我相信好些脫班的情況是可以避免的. 只要多派些外勤人員留意交




通和客量情況, 是可以及早應變的. 只說著一些如'塞車非所能控制'




的老生常談, 乘客無奈之餘, 只會對該公司的服務失去信心.




站在擠迫的車廂內, 還要被一些司機/某些巴士迷稱作甚麼咸魚, 門




口狗之類, 這亦是令人氣結的.



Article 21:


致板主:更換電郵問題



獎門人 (xyz@ipoline.com) from proxy1.rchhl1.on.wave.home.com at Mon Nov 30 12:45, 1998 said:



致板主:如要更換電郵地址應該點樣係本板個account service度更




改呢?



Article 22:


[問]巴士司機



豐巴 (simong@netvigator.com) from olkc5013.netvigator.com at Mon Nov 30 12:34, 1998 said:



1.新入行的巴士司機經過訓練後有無話特別調去某些線實習?









如有:是哪些線呢?









2.司機[手查]邊條線係咪公司決定,自己不能做決定呢?



Article 23:


[建議]顏色柱分辨路線法



豐巴 (simong@netvigator.com) from olkc5013.netvigator.com at Mon Nov 30 12:30, 1998 said:



原理和禁區柱差不多,




即在站柱油上不同的顏色表示不同的目的地




例如: 紅柱表示即將過海




黑柱表示東行




白柱表示西行




淺藍柱表示南行




淺綠柱表示北行




黃柱表示往機場 等









目的: 方便不懂字的人和色弱的人









意見如何?









豐巴



Article 24:


路線之最(3)



豐巴 (simong@netvigator.com) from olkc5005.netvigator.com at Mon Nov 30 12:16, 1998 said:



請各位解答:









1)車種最多款式的路線?









2)派車最多的路線?









3)派車最少的路線?









4)最快取消的路線?




(唔好意思,搵唔番舊文,要問多次! Sorry!)









麻煩晒!









聽日揭曉11月份新巴東區服務指數的




豐巴



Article 25:


渣Turbo M之前需要訓練?



Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) from hhtam005153.netvigator.com at Mon Nov 30 12:11, 1998 said:



今日聽一名九巴車長所講,謂而家渣64K及77K既Turbo M




(即以前51果D M仔)既車長事前需要經過訓練至可以渣




Turbo M,究竟係唔係真既呢?




如果係,咁又點解要訓練過先渣得呢?









另外想知Turbo M除左要更換引擎同波箱外,仲有冇其他需




要改裝既地方?









Tony(S3M61)




(九巴)70討論區



Article 26:


星期六及今日所見 + 問問題



DR4834 (h9810424@hkusua.hku.hk) from hkusud.hku.hk at Mon Nov 30 12:09, 1998 said:



星期六:




(1)正如一位板友所講 城記搵部1309行90C




(2)城記豪969行969




(3)九記968行都普躉









今日:




(1)城記十二米豪681行681









(1)所有巴士的鐘 按了一次 在車門打開前 便不會再叮




但各位知不知新記亞記躉的鐘可以在車門打開前勁叮?




(我星期六坐部1038叮左三次)




(2)近來見九記1A行紳佳 正不正常?




(3)除二了2A 98A 98C 1A 外 什麼線行過紳佳?




(4)各間巴士公司未來購買巴士的動向為何?




(正如航空公司 OPTION(有意買)幾多部 咩車型




ORDERED(買左不過未到)幾多部 咩車型)




(5)是不是只是用船運巴士來港?









(其實一日問問題 但很少去答問題 可以在討論區生存嗎?)



Article 27:


香港仔又爆水渠……



LX253 (kcchan@speednet.net) from ws_54_95.ied.edu.hk at Mon Nov 30 11:02, 1998 said:



今朝早拖住疲倦o既身軀返學,行完樓梯落到香港仔大道如常




諗住去坐42,點知條路濕得好勁,原來響『金X麵包』門口又




爆水渠,『廖X興銀行』對出o既站牌,城巴以經貼住通告,




謂由於爆水渠,車輛改道,車站改在香港仔總站70坑附近,




但係新記就乜都冇,搭客如常企響度等車,我就冇咁好耐性,




最後去o左香港仔總站坐38出天樂里轉車返學。









雖然我唔係咁鍾意城巴,不過今次真係要讚一讚佢o地辦事效




率夠快,站頭有指示之餘仲有個稽查企響銀行門口。而新記




就得部稽查車泊響總站,但係乜指示都冇(不過話需說回來,




可能新記車冇改路呢!)









另外,今日路經黃竹坑時又發現黃廠頂又出現十部亞記躉。









尋晚好夜至『死』完份report的




LX253



Article 28:


新巴熱狗數目



9822 DA53 (b1wkca22@pop1.sympatico.ca) from 3.209.5.197.dialup.accessv.com at Mon Nov 30 08:00, 1998 said:



可唔可以報一報數?




熱狗余下數目﹕




LV




DS




LF




SF




ML




DL (係咪得DL10轉了做訓練?)




MB




MC




DM -28




LM -10









另﹕是否所有紅番頭工程車仍健在?



Article 29:


[網頁通告] 九巴讚彈專區 開幕



32 Jacky (jackyyng@hkschool.net) from aquila.hkschool.net at Sun Nov 29 23:36, 1998 said:



由於字軌車討論區的使用率低,所以經本人的考慮,改左做一個




專以九巴的好壞為題材作為本板的新專題,名為九巴讚彈專區




閣下可以在此輸入有關九巴路線,派車,服務的好壞,亦可以作出




投訴(有冇九巴高層看就不得而知).









但若作出投訴請作出認真的投訴,勿郁下就話要cut線俾某巴做呀!




一見到此等文章,即砍!請注意注意.










ps:若有九巴高層看本板,知道有個咁既板的話就好啦!我地又多條




投訴門路.(雖然可能性不大)









本板的網址:




1. http://w3.to/bt32sbdb




2. http://w3.to/32bdb2




3. http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id-33284




任何一個均可










32太守Jacky




ps:方面打文,出面會用以前出現過的32 Jacky的.請注意.









順便推介下 32巴士討論區




注:由於原文出少少錯,所以已修正.



Article 30:


尋車+尋人+啟事



Kwan (sfac3a09@netvigator.com) from imscache01a.netvigator.com at Sun Nov 29 23:06, 1998 said:



車: 1A用的易搭巴士 DART 仔




人: 一位曾叫PMMX233 的板友,我不見了他ICQ.









另外請任何曾經用ICQ與我談話但長期見我OFFLINE




人士請盡快用 ICQ: 7897774 找我! 因為我不見了




很多人的ICQ NO.









我將會與Billy 兄合作做一個新的運輸網頁,但由於




兩人沒有時間整理大批資料,所以本人正找一個




人幫我們.最好有scaner為合.









最好請用 ICQ: 7897774或 電郵:sfac3a09@netvigator.com




找我.(註明:人材招募)









唔好意思,有少少離題.謝謝!



Article 31:


8P 仍要努力....



Sunba (akyl@rubens.its.unimelb.edu.au) from 202.82.244.132 at Sun Nov 29 22:13, 1998 said:



26/11/98 華潤百貨 銅鑼灣 1540-1900 星期五




之8P班次:




時間 車號 前車分隔 (分鐘)




1548 8P 1018




1552 8P 1019 4




1604 8P 1047 12




1614 8P 1048 10




1625 8P 1001 11




1633 8P 1002 8




1641 8P 1003 8




1649 8P 1004 8




1659 8P 1005 10




1704 8P 1006 5




1719 8P 1007 15 Full




1738 8P 1018 19 Full




1757 8P 1019 19 Full




1806 8P 1017 9




1809 8P 1048 3




1812 8P 1001 3




1816 8P 1002 4




1823 8P 1003 7




1831 8P 1004 8




1834 8P 1005 3




1838 8P 1006 4




1851 8P 1007 13




Try to imagine if you were waiting at Victoria Park on 1705,




you will need an hour until you can get on another 8P!









This is not acceptable.









Sunba



Article 32:


今朝城記rt.788有Man 15XX



小丸子新巴訓練車T101 (k5959585@hkschool.net) from 202.40.141.30 at Mon Nov 30 13:27, 1998 said:



今早,城記rt.788有兩架Man 15XX!請問非上下班time城




記rt.788可用Man 15XX呢?



















昨晚見到rt.8P有dart 仔行的....




T101




VA51 TONG HN8481



Article 33:


新記5x5站牌



Sunba (akyl@rubens.its.unimelb.edu.au) from ip-51-198.dialup.hkstar.com at Mon Nov 30 14:08, 1998 said:



問:有那一新記站牌上之25格已經填滿?









Sunba



Article 34:


[號召] 要回城291的文!



Citybus 291 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from ustsu54-nc2.ust.hk at Mon Nov 30 16:15, 1998 said:



Please reply for my passages if you wish as my passages are debatable & carefully designed.









Please do not be threated to post your responses. Posting of responses would make the board better & more worthy to read.









Citybus 291



Article 35:


問新ADS去向



穗禾苑之星(GP7528) (louche@netvigator.com) from hhtam018211.netvigator.com at Mon Nov 30 16:15, 1998 said:



又話九巴買新ADS,點解咁耐都仲未有?咁呢批車會唔會行類似80M,81K,




線呢?最後,呢批車有冇有特別,例如安全帶,低地台。唔該。



Article 36:


【網頁更新】(九巴)70討論區



Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) from hhtam005146.netvigator.com at Mon Nov 30 16:11, 1998 said:



由於《路線建議坊》及《巴士牛河建議欄》使用率偏低,及成日有人搗亂,因此由即日起該兩部份會永久停址使用。




另:《私人留言冊》亦已被調走,但仍會保留。各位若想前往該處可到下列網址:









http://www.guestbook.de/yasg.cgi?X=144272









另外:「70號字軌/掛牌資料一覽」亦已更新,




加入70歷來使用車型一覽(1973-現在),歡迎參觀!




按此處可往「(九巴)70號字軌/掛牌資料一覽」部份




同時亦可使用該欄內「返回(九巴)70討論區主頁」來返回




(九巴)70討論區。









Tony(S3M61)




(九巴)70討論區



Article 37:


問香港獨有車型



港島西人 (kwan113@netteens.net) from imsp013.netvigator.com at Mon Nov 30 16:08, 1998 said:



香港獨有車型




車隊編碼 型號




MB 都城11.45米



Article 38:


[廣告]北區凸別行正區



璁巴集團 (miketal@hkstar.com) from 202.82.193.142 at Mon Nov 30 14:51, 1998 said:



北區凸別行正區




歡迎討論與北區有關之話題



Article 39:


問203E派車



人一個 (yky@netteens.net) from hksn4.school.net.hk at Mon Nov 30 14:39, 1998 said:








如題









203E









thank



Article 40:


下午繁時經過高士威道東行之巴士架次



Sunba (akyl@rubens.its.unimelb.edu.au) from ip-51-198.dialup.hkstar.com at Mon Nov 30 14:35, 1998 said:



由 1540-1900, 50 線巴士總共 1063 架次.細分如下:




2-13,2A-20,5-16,5B-29,8-33,8P-22,8X-57,10-29,11-21,19-16,




23-27,23A-16,23B-12,25-24,25A-16,25C-18,26-12,38-28,




42-14,63(N)-7,63(S)-7,72-41,72A-21,76-5,77-16,81(L)-14,




81(H)-14,96-16,99-17,102-40,106-25,108-14,110-15,112-43,




116-32,592-23,601-27,603-26,619-17,621-4,671-11,680-21,




681-21,690-22,691-20,914-16,962-16,968-23,969-17,




A11-16,E11-15









Sunba



Article 41:


Today's HKUST Intl Industry Show



Citybus 291 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from ustsu54-nc2.ust.hk at Mon Nov 30 14:24, 1998 said:



The International Industry Show is being held in HKUST today. There are many industry companies, including Peugeot, and most from France, parpicitating the show.









This shows the HKUST is a good place to ahve show, conventions, and of course, tourist spot.









Thus there is a need to cut KMB 91 to Citybus & change to Citybus 291, so there would be better bus service by introducing competition.









Citybus 291