19980929







Articles on 29th September, 1998.

Today's Articles: 24.



Articles' Numbers: (19980929_01-24)








Article 1:


Re: 新巴為何常常撞車????



Gakei! (gakei@netvigator.com) from hkpu15.polyu.edu.hk at Mon Sep 28 23:12, 1998 said:



> Trident (sonic@netteens.net) said:




> 本人覺得新巴接辦中巴的專營權後,司機的資素好像是比以前中巴時差了很多,




> 以前中巴時很少看到中巴撞車,但現在就常常見到新巴撞車




> (希望大家俾多少意見)









可能跟不熟習渣新車有關.




(那麼其實是撞新車多還是舊車多 ?)









--




車匙!



Article 1: (Request 1)


新巴士只係撞過一部Dart, Trident就未撞過。









多o左撞車可能只係巧合。(中巴夠臨尾成個VA63車頂炒o左去)




輝仔



Article 1: (Request 2)


其實在中巴時代都會有大大小小的交通意外發生,現在轉了公司,




大家對新巴的期望較大,很可能對意外的關注度也較高。




在車長而言,很多規則亦'執正'了很多,工作壓力也大了,




可能會影嚮工作情緒和表現。









巴士文



Article 1: (Request 3)


除0左頭一日撞0左架新巴Dart之外 ,




其餘都是前中記的舊車 , 包括




DA87 和 DA65 , 其餘0既要各位知情




板友接力啦 , 勞煩晒 .









By LA11 Shing (^_^) (^_^)



Article 1: (Request 4)


> 輝仔 (c5124176@comp.polyu.edu.hk) said:




> DA87幾時撞? o係邊度撞?









前幾晚同電車撞o個架呢~~



Article 2:


Re: [Magazine] CMB and KMB



y k shum (ykshum@mit.edu) from maxima.mit.edu at Tue Sep 29 06:18, 1998 said:



> LF2 (BE 8749) (huil@genrad.com) said:




> The following picture is taking from NextPhoto Magazine.




> Anyone know where this picture is taken and when? Also, anyone




> know the fleet number?




>




>




>




> LF2 (BE 8749)









Is that Emil Chow Wah Kin? I think he did some photo session




with Next to promote his CD last month, just before CMB




handed its franchise to NWFB. The theme is that he grew up




in North Point and witnessed it had all changed in the last




three decades .....









y k



Article 2: (Request 1)


架中巴係DA54, 九巴就唔知.




(HINTS: 睇睇中巴條Banner, 只此一架賣林淦山, 九巴係3N115(唔同樣).




疊茵庭



Article 2: (Request 2)


乜係周華健黎咩? 我睇到好似係古巨基喎.









咁多人遮住晒架車下半身, 完全冇可能估到係邊架喎.



Article 3:


Re: 【討論】人類身高與巴士上下層高度問題



Citybus 10 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from max11-22.hk.super.net at Tue Sep 29 09:00, 1998 said:



> 大腦電波 (leungtam@hknet.com) said:




> 昨天蘋果日報報導人類的高度與種族無關,只要營養足夠,每一個人都




> 可以快高長大.負責報告的教授更指出香港人可在未來一兩代後,高度




> 與西方人看齊.




> 內文




>




> 事實上,好多年青人的高度比他們的父母高出接近一個頭的高度.




> 如果係咁,我覺得巴士公司應該檢討巴士上下層的高度.




> 現時巴士每層都唔足兩米.將來會有好多市民在巴士上站立或走步時,




> 需要烏低頭,長期咁做會容易駝背.




> 本人建議將來的雙層巴士應該




> 上層:1.9米,下層:2.1米,調低下層地面.




> 原因,因上層不准站立,所以把上層高度調低少少.




> 調低下層地面可使車身高度維持在4.4-4.5米之間.




>




> 歡迎討論.




This is possible for buses of 4.4m high, but for buses of 4.2m th headroom for upper & lower decks should be 1.7m & 2.1m respectively, and for buses of only 4m high (used in cross-border routes) they are 1.7m & 1.9m.




Citybus 10



Article 3: (Request 1)


我覺得上層可以改1.9M,下層起碼兩米,因為我記得我坐勝利




二型時成日中頭獎..









金魚字 DB7872 HS7872 HU7872



Article 3: (Request 2)


睇完閣下0既文章,令小弟聯想起以下問題:




現今巴士0既車身高度,內籠設計係由:-




1.政府已有法律規定,還是




2.由巴士公司自行設計,亦或係




3.根據車身供應商既設計.




如果巴士0既車身高度,內籠係根據車身供應商0既




原產地為設計標準(即歐洲人0既標準),係咪代表




已合符香港人0既未來需求呢?









請各位多多指教!!!



Article 4:


改善巴士迷形象



K.Y.Chung (w3d080r@school.net.hk) from blue.alumni.cuhk.edu.hk at Mon Sep 28 23:45, 1998 said:



如題,大家唸下點先至改善巴士迷的形象?




我就有幾樣:




1.唔再在車上同師傅傾偈.




2.唔再在車上大聲傾偈.




3.上車時即刻俾錢.(唔好晤會,我上車實俾




足錢.)




請follow




p.s.由於續期問題,我可能要取消個internet




account,到時我個工廠要關閉,我也可能要




和大家說再見了......想知係咪真係要離開




本版同關閉間工廠就在10月後揭盅(因為我




都唔知會唔會).



Article 4: (Request 1)


還有:




4 不要發表一些不負責任的言論




5 不要'吹水', 欺騙巴士乘客及其他巴士迷




6 不要亂動巴士上的設備, 特別是不可私自進入駕駛室




7 不要只是針對某一公司, 而應一視同仁評論各巴士公司的好壞,




而不是偏激地要'某某公司死', '某某公司cut線給某某公司'




8 不要偷巴士上的任何物件




9 不要取大量的巴士單張, 把單張留給有需要的乘客




10 不要做一些事影響其他乘客, 如問每個乘客'這條路線好不好'




11 影巴士時小心安全, 不要影響其他道路使用者, 包括行人, 巴士




車長, 其他駕駛人仕.....




12 排隊上車, 多謝合作




13 請勿霸佔坐位, 讓坐給有需要者....




14 請勿在未經許可下, 從事一些巴士乘客不可做的事, 如'搞'牌,




開關車門, 洗巴士.....




15 不要阻礙巴士公司職員工作









請繼續接力









Alex Chan.



Article 4: (Request 2)


> Gakei! (gakei@netvigator.com) said:




> 我認為在迷巴士時奉公守法, 凡事憑良心去做,




> 唔迷巴士時就做一個正常人, 專心學業或工作,




> 做一個負責任的人, 做好自己在家庭和社會的角色,




> 不要和非巴士迷的親戚朋友說太多巴士等等... 都




> 可以改善作為一個巴士迷在旁人眼中的形象.









總而言之, 便是自重和尊重別人, 上文提及的'不要'什麼, 要列的話




幾百條也可以, 但要行之有效, 還在於自律.









尊重別人,律己以嚴, 便是改善形象的最好方法.









Alex Chan.



Article 5:


城記Trident斜板



陳義 (97017130j@polyu.edu.hk) from hkpu15.polyu.edu.hk at Tue Sep 29 12:53, 1998 said:



想問城記除左 Cityflyer 有斜板外, 有邊部仲有斜板?









我見新都普單/雙門 Tridents, 同亞力 Tridents 好似冇都冇斜板.




其實俾咁多錢買車都唔差在買多塊板啦!









陳義



Article 5: (Request 1)


2201的中門就一定有。(因為我影過。)



Article 6:


[Newspaper] NWFB Accident



LF2 (BE 8749) (huil@genrad.com) from 132.223.232.153 at Tue Sep 29 05:02, 1998 said:



From AppleDaily (29 Sept 98)









貨 車 被 撞 如 炮 彈 撼 商 舖




新 巴 司 機 休 兩 日 仍 稱 倦 極 失 控















Picture set










LF2 (BE 8749)



Article 6: (Request 1)


以下文章是節錄自今日(29.9.98)明報﹕









運菜貨車遭新巴撞上行人路



Article 7:


Re: 城記'鳶鴦'門?!



Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) from human3.upnaway.com.au at Tue Sep 29 00:31, 1998 said:



> GB2444,FX8032 (jackie01@hknet.com) said:




> 今日見到部城記'大富豪'(54?...睇唔清楚:p)行969.




> 度落車門一邊係黃色扶手,另一邊竟然係紅色扶手!!!




>




> 後來又見到部單層MAN行25C,度落車門又係一便紅色,一邊黑色!!!




>




> 城記,好心啦!連呢o的o野都做唔好,點做大事呀?!









那你情願見到‘鳶鴦’門的出現,還是見到他們在沒有扶手的情況下‘行街’呢﹖



Article 8:


Re: 以後去港島區拜山有無巴士坐呢?



congjiao (chunkwok@hkstar.com) from saturn.csc.cuhk.edu.hk at Tue Sep 29 12:59, 1998 said:



> VA-61 (kyy690@netvigator.com) said:




> 自從政府取消了347、388、389這三條拜山線後,究竟以後有冇巴士




> 去【哥連臣角】呢?(47A已取締347)




>









I think, for 347, no need la.




But for Cap Corrision, I think some transport should be provide.




I think NWFB should face this problem, otherwise, CTB may open new




route to serve that area ka la!









Moreover, 15A and 15M is also cancelled, but I think CTB serve this




area during Mid-autumn and CHung Yeung...









But ..I don;t like this.....



Article 9:


改篇電視廣告一則



K.Y.Chung (w3d080r@school.net.hk) from blue.alumni.cuhk.edu.hk at Mon Sep 28 23:36, 1998 said:



(嘿嘿嘿嘿......)




維修效率咁差,壞車就成日見到.




(嘿嘿嘿嘿嘿嘿......)




提高水準.




(唔......)




(D零件損耗咁大,最好盡快換左佢......)




做好債務管理,注意車隊維修,保養車上設備.




**************************************




(改篇自:火無情,小心無情火.)




睇完之後唸唔唸到我講緊咩野?請積極回應!



Article 9: (Request 1)


哈!我又諗到一個喎……




(一個乘客站在街邊面對鏡頭講o野)




『我想坐熱狗……』(俾人兜巴星)




『唔好迫我坐冷馬』(俾人兜巴星)




『你D車好易壞…』(俾人兜巴星)




『咁多車塞住條路』(俾人兜巴星)




『你d車有縮味…』(俾人兜巴星)




『又話每個月40部新車』(俾人兜巴星)




『司機行錯路……』(俾人兜巴星)




『我話你……』(又俾人兜巴星)




乘客大叫:『好喇喎!!』




旁白:家醜不外傳,我o地公司有乘客聯絡小組,




你有不滿就上o黎講喇,駛乜響街講俾人打……









旁白:




唔想一肚氣,我o地幫到你!




乜巴乘客聯絡小組現正招募組員。









(改自CxI開放電訊市場廣告)




LX253



Article 10:


N969 & M21



Sunba (akyl@rubens.its.unimelb.edu.au) from melproxy.comcen.com.au at Mon Sep 28 23:17, 1998 said:



How come there are 15 buses on N969? Isn't it a 30 mins services?




15*30mins = 450mins/6 hrs per trip?! can anyone explain to me?









And where can i find M21 on the scheduled bus list?









Sunba



Article 10: (Request 1)


M21字軌表可到新巴2-27號字軌表找,不過OUT哂DATE




竟然仲有勝利二型走,M21好似轉哂空調車喎









金魚字 BL37,LW57,AV522



Article 11:


Re: 問:哪條新記路線字軌車泊柴廠



CMB,LA24 (la24@netteen.net) from imsp039.netvigator.com at Mon Sep 28 22:16, 1998 said:













> AA1234 (id00639@netvigator.com) said:




> 如題




Routes park in Chai Wan Depot: R.8,81,82,84,84M,88,106,112,116,




601,680,691,781,914.









LA24,FJ1017



Article 12:


Is Citybus Service That Poor??



Citybus 10 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from max11-22.hk.super.net at Tue Sep 29 09:04, 1998 said:



> EVA-01 (lamxlam@netvigator.com) said:




> What do you feel about the service of Citybus after taking ovre some CMB routes? In my view, it is getting worse and worse.




>




> When the route 10 was still ran by CMB, it took 15-20 minutes from North Point to Wan Chai.




>




> However, when the route is ran by Citybus, it takes over 40 minutes to run the same distance in the morning and the afternoon at the same road condition. Why?




>




> The reason is that the drivers are lack of training! They are so scare and can hardly control the bus. I ride on a snail everyday, afraid that I may be late for school!




>




But I think this is because traffic congestion generated by Citybus & NWFB!!









> Also, Citybus allocates less bus on this route than CMB. Although the hotline states that the frequency is about 7-10 minutes. I always wait for up to 15-20 minutes. ( I get on the bus at several bus stops after the terminal).




>




But perhaps you are taking it at night!!









> Improving quantity of service is not just buying a lot a lot of new bus. Most of the people want a safe, fast, direct and frequent service. Obviously, Citybus can't meet these.




>




> I am extremely disappointed with Citybus.




>









Citybus 10









>



Article 13:


Re: 有關車牌報料中心



TomChen (tomchen@netvigator.com) from hhttnt02211.netvigator.com at Mon Sep 28 19:05, 1998 said:



> 金魚 (n960@hkabc.net) said:




>




> 今日我看車牌報料中心,有板友寫




> 城巴2006車牌為HW4127




> 但今日我在赤立角機場貨運區,




> 見到2206車牌是HW4127




>




> 請各位注意,2206車牌是HW4127,不是2006









2206正確車牌為HW4172.



Article 14:


My wonderful journey to the South



Citybus 10 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from ustsu18-nc2.ust.hk at Tue Sep 29 13:52, 1998 said:



I haven't been to the south since I have entered HKUST in 1st Sept, so I took a Southern trip this morning to see the changes in the bus termini after the setting up of NWFB & more importantly, new buses of Citybus.




I saw 4 new AD on Citybus during the trip. They are Colour 18 ladies wear, Jessica Ladies Wear & 2 Tommy Hilfiger AD, one with 5 child under the USA flag & one with young women having picnic in the country.




I also saw many special departures of NWFB, including LF 28 & SF 15 on Rt 94, both with Civil Education Human Rights AD, LV 43 with an AD for a weight-decreasing Chinese tea, running on Rt 91 (It ran on rt 20 before 1st Sept), 2019 (Dennis Dart) running on Rt 38, and LF 211, having Man An Insurance AD running on Rt 23 (It was used to run on CMB 10).




When I was on the way to HKUST by KMB 91M, I also saw a KMB BL running on Rt 10 & it is the first time to have such bus on the route.




How wonderful the trip it is!!




Citybus 10



Article 15:


[討論]各巴之資詢熱線



香港仔 (controla@hkstar.com) from 202.82.136.47 at Tue Sep 29 08:27, 1998 said:



小弟在未上網前,常打電話到各大字




號查詢巴士線資料,對各熱線有以下




之個人見解:




先講新記,我覺得佢0既路線搜索功能




比較多元化,例如可以選查所有路線




或單一種路線,新路線等.而聽完之後




又可以返回前一個目錄聽多一次,而




想省略某一項唔聽,只要按制便會跳




到下一項.只於資料都算詳盡,她比九




記多0左個停站數目.而開頭把女聲就




比較'老餅',入到查詢路線,把聲似機




械人講野,聽得我好幸苦.




到城記, 佢0既女聲比較'甜'D,但路線




搜索方法就比未轉之前模糊,例如張




屋村線混入專利線,唔好似以前0禁




分開獨立,而資料方面就比其他公司




無0禁詳盡,不過佢都有返回總目錄,擺




係每項查詢0既尾部.




到我比較少查0既九記,佢0既錄音有男




有女,D聲都幾好聽,但讀路線no.時就




變左機械人聲.資料都幾詳盡,而且經




常有新消息notice,但好似無返回前目




錄這個功能,聽完要打多次去問其他.









嘩!原來寫到0禁長la,其他公司留待你




地去繼續,努力!!!









PS:以上只為個人對使用服務時0既觀




感,非針對某一公司.



Article 16:


[全新巴士網頁]--鄉郊巴士村



anthony lam (lsf@hknet.com) from 203.80.102.151 at Tue Sep 29 04:10, 1998 said:



歡迎來參觀,遲些會再增加圖片數量.









http://hello.to/bus2



Article 17:


[Newspaper] Sai Kung Accident



LF2 (BE 8749) (huil@genrad.com) from 132.223.232.153 at Tue Sep 29 03:03, 1998 said:



The following picture is taking from AppleDaily (27 Sept 98).









The accident happened near Sai Kung. The bus in the




background looks like BL1 or BL2 (schedule bus of 94/99). Did




anyone know if it is the case? Anyone live in/pass by that




area and saw the accident? How many bus routes are affected?



















LF2 (BE 8749)



Article 18:


【網頁加相】Hong Kong Bus Terminal



T.P.T. (dckk@netteens.net) from hkpu15.polyu.edu.hk at Tue Sep 29 01:33, 1998 said:



Hong Kong Bus Terminal 網頁廣告:









本網頁內的所有相片已經重新素描, 以下分頁更加相:




城巴機場快線20張




中巴銀色飛鏢6張




新巴1001相片7張









亦歡迎到桌面底色圖案下載wallpaper.









P.S. 最新巴士新聞將於10月1/2日更新.









.....




T.P.T.



Article 19:


Bus Wanted!!!



LV49 (andy0617@eisa.net.au) from ppp11-7.eisa.net.au at Tue Sep 29 00:48, 1998 said:



Can anyone tell me where is AD59 (FD1179) gone?




Which route is AD59 running at the moment?




Was it from K deport transfer to L deport?




Because my last time that I saw AD59 was on Route 102, but when I go back to 1994, it used to running Route 106.



Article 20:


〔轉貼〕中大校巴政策研究小組



林文放 (manhing@hkstar.com) from earth.csc.cuhk.edu.hk at Tue Sep 29 00:29, 1998 said:



轉貼自cuhk.forum




歡迎就讀於中大巴士迷參與









校巴一直以來與同學息息相關




而相關服務質素、路線、分站設置、車輛購置等都與同學有關




為了提升學生代表於提出與校巴相關政策議案的質素




正招請志同道合的同學組織校巴政策研究組




就有關問題交換意見









如你對中大校巴問題有所研究,或本身是巴士迷,對公共交通




有一定認識,歡迎加入本人的校巴政策研究組









請聯絡本人




傳呼:78387520




電郵:s975286@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk














--




黃世澤




香港中文大學學生會代表會逸夫書院代表









林文放



Article 21:


[網頁廣告]路線238X網頁更新



野比大雄 (busstop@netvigator.com) from 202.85.97.104 at Mon Sep 28 22:46, 1998 said:



【版本1.1】









很久沒更新過網頁了,臨近國慶長假,本網頁終於作出了更新。









首先,本網頁的參觀人次已於本日傍晚超越五千,謝謝大家的支持。









現在入正題:本網頁在九月二十七日更新,內容如下:









一、「巴士散文」第14篇推出版本0.1,稍後將作進一步更新。




二、「巴士散文」之目錄已被分拆為中文及英文兩部份。




三、「荃葵青搭巴士手冊」正式被改組為「荃灣搭巴士手冊」,並作




  出少許更新。




四、主頁選單已被更新,在標題下有三個「按鈕」:英文、繁體中文




  和簡體中文。









歡迎參觀(請按下面的banner進入)









正在練習在板上輸入語體文的




野比大雄



















推介網頁



Article 22:


新巴何時有新一批巴士到港?



VA64 Pang (b3391@netvigator.com) from hhttnt02211.netvigator.com at Mon Sep 28 20:47, 1998 said:



如題.



















Thank you very much.



Article 23:


Grand Rearrangement of Island Routes



Citybus 10 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from ustsu18-nc2.ust.hk at Tue Sep 29 14:35, 1998 said:



Here is to say my suggestions on rearrangement of the Islands routes.




For 10 years, the demand for bus services in the East, except Siu Sai Wan, is ever decreasing because of opening of MTR, while the demand in other regions of the Island are ever increasing. Also, Citybus' taking up of Route 10 ended the competition between Citybus & CMB in the West while its taking up of 780 & 788 fires competition between Citybus & NWFB in Siu Sai Wan, plus the air-conditionization of NWFB Rt 2 fires the war between NWFB 2 & Citybus 5B, 10, 77 & 99, so a proper rearrangement of routes is extremely necessary to ensure the level of service in all districts are equally high.









The suggestions are:









(1) Rearrangement of Stanley Routes




The 2nd phase of Ma Hang Estate, its shopping arcade & the extension of Carmel Road from Stanley to Ma Hang would be completed in early 1999, so the demand for bus service from Ma Hang would greatly increase in both quality & quantity. The Carmel Road is wide & straight enough to let 12m buses to go through, so Citybus should rearrange the bus routes to Stanley, as follows:




(a) Rt 6A would be reformed so it goes to Stanley Prison via Aberdeen Tunnel, Ma Hang, but not Wong Ma Kok Road. 12m buses would be used to cope with the demand.




(b) Rt 6 is unchanged in places to go excpet it terminates in Stanlet Fort.




(c) Rt 73 would be renamed as 67 & it goes through Ma Hang estate, but not Wong Ma Kok Road. Also, NWFB 374 would be cancelled.




(d) To unify the network, 399 would be operated by Citybus.




(e) An electronic interchange system would be introduced to all Stanley routes to allow passengers to interchange for a bus so they can go to any places between Deep Water Bay & Stanley wihout paying extra fare.




(f) Route 63 would be cancelled & 65 would also be operated by Citybus to unify the network. It would run 7 days a week. Passengers going from Stanley to Lei Tak estate can take an interchange at Wong Nei Chung Gap to take 41A.




This rearrangement saves about 10 buses yet increases passenger carrying capacity by about 15%.









(2) Reduction in number of Western routes




Citybus now has 8 routes in the West & is too many. So reduction in the number of routes is necessary to save buses & increase number of passengers carried by bus.




(a) Cancel 5 so only 10 is remained, but 10 would not go to Happy Valley.




(b) 5C is cancelled.




(c) 10X is cancelled.




(d) 5A is cancelled & 1 would extend to Kennedy Town, but electronic fare system must be set up to allow passengers pay less ($3.4) when they are not going up to places above Happy Valley (Lower) Terminus.




(e) Rt 47A would have Central Piers as terminus so people in Kennedy Town can have direct bu service to Central Piers. Its fare is lowered to $4.7 (whole trip), $3.4 (between Felix Villas & Central Piers) & electronic fare system is introduced to reduce cost of travelling to Felix Villas.




(f) Special departures from Sai Ying Poon are available during morning rush hours to ensure all people can take a bus.









(3) Reformation of Mid-Levels Bus Service




(a) NWFB 43 is cancelled & Citybus 40B would go through Chi Fu in both directions. Both 40A & 40B would have Tin Wan as terminus. This saves at least 5 buses & all passengers would have best service.




(b) NWFB Rt 23A would be cancelled as the demand for bus service from there to Causeway Bay is not that large.









(4) Reformation of Ap Lei Chau Routes




(a) Citybus Route 92 would be cancelled to prevent duplication as better 592 is available & there are very few passengers in 92.









(5) Reformation of Shau Kei Wan Routes




(a) NWFB M21 would be cancelled & 20 would be upgraded to full-AC M20, starting from Yiu Tung Estate, then Taikoo Shing & then follow the route of M21.




(b) Rt 2A would be cancelled & 2 would be air-conditionized, with Yiu Tung as terminus.




(3) Rt 720 would be cancelled. Rt 722 would start from Yiu Tung, then go to Taikoo Shing. This only spends extra 3 minutes, but saves 10 buses & improves its profitability.









Thanks for any comments on my suggestion!!




Citybus 10



Article 24:


Reply for the rearrangement of island rt



BusBus (z2238103@student.unsw.edu.au) from p38-max3.syd.ihug.com.au at Tue Sep 29 15:14, 1998 said:



I just want to reply CITYBUS 10 suggestion for Stanley bus routes only,




can u next time give out meaningful idea, please!!!!!!!!




why 399, 63, 65 had to give to CITYBUS to operate??????




why dont CITYBUS give 6, 6A, 6X, 73, 260 to NWFB to operate????? I am very interested in this




question!!!!!




Also if u not sure about the name of the road in Stanley district please dont type it out,




do u know where is Wong Ma Kok Road???? It is where the road link between Stanley Village to Stanley




Fort,




I just want to ask that why I now in Sydney I know this but u r in HK but u dont know?????




The road link between Repulse Bay and Stanley is STANLEY GAP ROAD ar, u dont know ar??? why a




person in Sydney know but u dont know?????




Also u said use 12metres bus to operate the Stanley route???




is that this bus just service between Ma Hang and Stanley???




How can this 12metres bus can go out to Repluse Bay and Deep Water Bay via Repulse Bay Road, Deep




Water Bay Road and wong Nai Chung Gap Road????









From a person who had USE STANLEY BUS SERVICES CONTINOUSLY FOR 5 YEARS




29.09.98----16:57 in Sydney replying the NAME OF THE ROAD FOR A HK GUY!!!!!!



Article 24: (Request 1)


U havent reply me about the road of WONG MA KOK ROAD!!!!!!!




REPLY TO ME LA, I AM IN SYDNEY NOW AR, TELL ME LA CITYBUS 10, U R IN HK MA









> Citybus 10 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) said:




> please don't open a new thread for an old topic as this wastes a lot of hard disk space in the server, increasing the change of hanging down!!




> Citybus 10