Today's Articles: 24.
Articles' Numbers: (19980929_01-24)
Gakei! (firstname.lastname@example.org) from hkpu15.polyu.edu.hk at Mon Sep 28 23:12, 1998 said:
> Trident (email@example.com) said:
Article 1: (Request 1)
Article 1: (Request 2)
Article 1: (Request 3)
其餘都是前中記的舊車 , 包括
DA87 和 DA65 , 其餘0既要各位知情
板友接力啦 , 勞煩晒 .
By LA11 Shing (^_^) (^_^)
Article 1: (Request 4)
> 輝仔 (firstname.lastname@example.org) said:
> DA87幾時撞？ o係邊度撞？
Re: [Magazine] CMB and KMB
y k shum (email@example.com) from maxima.mit.edu at Tue Sep 29 06:18, 1998 said:
> LF2 (BE 8749) (firstname.lastname@example.org) said:
> The following picture is taking from NextPhoto Magazine.
> Anyone know where this picture is taken and when? Also, anyone
> know the fleet number?
> LF2 (BE 8749)
Is that Emil Chow Wah Kin? I think he did some photo session
with Next to promote his CD last month, just before CMB
handed its franchise to NWFB. The theme is that he grew up
in North Point and witnessed it had all changed in the last
three decades .....
Article 2: (Request 1)
(HINTS: 睇睇中巴條Banner, 只此一架賣林淦山, 九巴係3N115(唔同樣).
Article 2: (Request 2)
Citybus 10 (email@example.com) from max11-22.hk.super.net at Tue Sep 29 09:00, 1998 said:
> 大腦電波 (firstname.lastname@example.org) said:
This is possible for buses of 4.4m high, but for buses of 4.2m th headroom for upper & lower decks should be 1.7m & 2.1m respectively, and for buses of only 4m high (used in cross-border routes) they are 1.7m & 1.9m.
Article 3: (Request 1)
金魚字 DB7872 HS7872 HU7872
Article 3: (Request 2)
K.Y.Chung (email@example.com) from blue.alumni.cuhk.edu.hk at Mon Sep 28 23:45, 1998 said:
Article 4: (Request 1)
5 不要'吹水', 欺騙巴士乘客及其他巴士迷
6 不要亂動巴士上的設備, 特別是不可私自進入駕駛室
7 不要只是針對某一公司, 而應一視同仁評論各巴士公司的好壞,
9 不要取大量的巴士單張, 把單張留給有需要的乘客
10 不要做一些事影響其他乘客, 如問每個乘客'這條路線好不好'
11 影巴士時小心安全, 不要影響其他道路使用者, 包括行人, 巴士
12 排隊上車, 多謝合作
13 請勿霸佔坐位, 讓坐給有需要者....
14 請勿在未經許可下, 從事一些巴士乘客不可做的事, 如'搞'牌,
Article 4: (Request 2)
> Gakei! (firstname.lastname@example.org) said:
> 我認為在迷巴士時奉公守法, 凡事憑良心去做,
> 唔迷巴士時就做一個正常人, 專心學業或工作,
> 做一個負責任的人, 做好自己在家庭和社會的角色,
> 不要和非巴士迷的親戚朋友說太多巴士等等... 都
總而言之, 便是自重和尊重別人, 上文提及的'不要'什麼, 要列的話
幾百條也可以, 但要行之有效, 還在於自律.
陳義 (email@example.com) from hkpu15.polyu.edu.hk at Tue Sep 29 12:53, 1998 said:
想問城記除左 Cityflyer 有斜板外, 有邊部仲有斜板?
我見新都普單/雙門 Tridents, 同亞力 Tridents 好似冇都冇斜板.
Article 5: (Request 1)
[Newspaper] NWFB Accident
LF2 (BE 8749) (firstname.lastname@example.org) from 18.104.22.168 at Tue Sep 29 05:02, 1998 said:
Article 6: (Request 1)
Dennis Law (email@example.com) from human3.upnaway.com.au at Tue Sep 29 00:31, 1998 said:
> GB2444,FX8032 (firstname.lastname@example.org) said:
congjiao (email@example.com) from saturn.csc.cuhk.edu.hk at Tue Sep 29 12:59, 1998 said:
> VA-61 (firstname.lastname@example.org) said:
I think, for 347, no need la.
But for Cap Corrision, I think some transport should be provide.
I think NWFB should face this problem, otherwise, CTB may open new
route to serve that area ka la!
Moreover, 15A and 15M is also cancelled, but I think CTB serve this
area during Mid-autumn and CHung Yeung...
But ..I don;t like this.....
K.Y.Chung (email@example.com) from blue.alumni.cuhk.edu.hk at Mon Sep 28 23:36, 1998 said:
Article 9: (Request 1)
N969 & M21
Sunba (firstname.lastname@example.org) from melproxy.comcen.com.au at Mon Sep 28 23:17, 1998 said:
How come there are 15 buses on N969? Isn't it a 30 mins services?
15*30mins = 450mins/6 hrs per trip?! can anyone explain to me?
And where can i find M21 on the scheduled bus list?
Article 10: (Request 1)
CMB,LA24 (email@example.com) from imsp039.netvigator.com at Mon Sep 28 22:16, 1998 said:
> AA1234 (firstname.lastname@example.org) said:
Routes park in Chai Wan Depot: R.8,81,82,84,84M,88,106,112,116,
Is Citybus Service That Poor??
Citybus 10 (email@example.com) from max11-22.hk.super.net at Tue Sep 29 09:04, 1998 said:
> EVA-01 (firstname.lastname@example.org) said:
> What do you feel about the service of Citybus after taking ovre some CMB routes? In my view, it is getting worse and worse.
> When the route 10 was still ran by CMB, it took 15-20 minutes from North Point to Wan Chai.
> However, when the route is ran by Citybus, it takes over 40 minutes to run the same distance in the morning and the afternoon at the same road condition. Why?
> The reason is that the drivers are lack of training! They are so scare and can hardly control the bus. I ride on a snail everyday, afraid that I may be late for school!
But I think this is because traffic congestion generated by Citybus & NWFB!!
> Also, Citybus allocates less bus on this route than CMB. Although the hotline states that the frequency is about 7-10 minutes. I always wait for up to 15-20 minutes. ( I get on the bus at several bus stops after the terminal).
But perhaps you are taking it at night!!
> Improving quantity of service is not just buying a lot a lot of new bus. Most of the people want a safe, fast, direct and frequent service. Obviously, Citybus can't meet these.
> I am extremely disappointed with Citybus.
TomChen (email@example.com) from hhttnt02211.netvigator.com at Mon Sep 28 19:05, 1998 said:
> 金魚 (firstname.lastname@example.org) said:
My wonderful journey to the South
Citybus 10 (email@example.com) from ustsu18-nc2.ust.hk at Tue Sep 29 13:52, 1998 said:
I haven't been to the south since I have entered HKUST in 1st Sept, so I took a Southern trip this morning to see the changes in the bus termini after the setting up of NWFB & more importantly, new buses of Citybus.
I saw 4 new AD on Citybus during the trip. They are Colour 18 ladies wear, Jessica Ladies Wear & 2 Tommy Hilfiger AD, one with 5 child under the USA flag & one with young women having picnic in the country.
I also saw many special departures of NWFB, including LF 28 & SF 15 on Rt 94, both with Civil Education Human Rights AD, LV 43 with an AD for a weight-decreasing Chinese tea, running on Rt 91 (It ran on rt 20 before 1st Sept), 2019 (Dennis Dart) running on Rt 38, and LF 211, having Man An Insurance AD running on Rt 23 (It was used to run on CMB 10).
When I was on the way to HKUST by KMB 91M, I also saw a KMB BL running on Rt 10 & it is the first time to have such bus on the route.
How wonderful the trip it is!!
香港仔 (firstname.lastname@example.org) from 22.214.171.124 at Tue Sep 29 08:27, 1998 said:
anthony lam (email@example.com) from 126.96.36.199 at Tue Sep 29 04:10, 1998 said:
[Newspaper] Sai Kung Accident
LF2 (BE 8749) (firstname.lastname@example.org) from 188.8.131.52 at Tue Sep 29 03:03, 1998 said:
The following picture is taking from AppleDaily (27 Sept 98).
The accident happened near Sai Kung. The bus in the
background looks like BL1 or BL2 (schedule bus of 94/99). Did
anyone know if it is the case? Anyone live in/pass by that
area and saw the accident? How many bus routes are affected?
LF2 (BE 8749)
【網頁加相】Hong Kong Bus Terminal
T.P.T. (email@example.com) from hkpu15.polyu.edu.hk at Tue Sep 29 01:33, 1998 said:
LV49 (firstname.lastname@example.org) from ppp11-7.eisa.net.au at Tue Sep 29 00:48, 1998 said:
Can anyone tell me where is AD59 (FD1179) gone?
Which route is AD59 running at the moment?
Was it from K deport transfer to L deport?
Because my last time that I saw AD59 was on Route 102, but when I go back to 1994, it used to running Route 106.
林文放 (email@example.com) from earth.csc.cuhk.edu.hk at Tue Sep 29 00:29, 1998 said:
野比大雄 (firstname.lastname@example.org) from 184.108.40.206 at Mon Sep 28 22:46, 1998 said:
VA64 Pang (email@example.com) from hhttnt02211.netvigator.com at Mon Sep 28 20:47, 1998 said:
Thank you very much.
Grand Rearrangement of Island Routes
Citybus 10 (firstname.lastname@example.org) from ustsu18-nc2.ust.hk at Tue Sep 29 14:35, 1998 said:
Here is to say my suggestions on rearrangement of the Islands routes.
For 10 years, the demand for bus services in the East, except Siu Sai Wan, is ever decreasing because of opening of MTR, while the demand in other regions of the Island are ever increasing. Also, Citybus' taking up of Route 10 ended the competition between Citybus & CMB in the West while its taking up of 780 & 788 fires competition between Citybus & NWFB in Siu Sai Wan, plus the air-conditionization of NWFB Rt 2 fires the war between NWFB 2 & Citybus 5B, 10, 77 & 99, so a proper rearrangement of routes is extremely necessary to ensure the level of service in all districts are equally high.
The suggestions are:
(1) Rearrangement of Stanley Routes
The 2nd phase of Ma Hang Estate, its shopping arcade & the extension of Carmel Road from Stanley to Ma Hang would be completed in early 1999, so the demand for bus service from Ma Hang would greatly increase in both quality & quantity. The Carmel Road is wide & straight enough to let 12m buses to go through, so Citybus should rearrange the bus routes to Stanley, as follows:
(a) Rt 6A would be reformed so it goes to Stanley Prison via Aberdeen Tunnel, Ma Hang, but not Wong Ma Kok Road. 12m buses would be used to cope with the demand.
(b) Rt 6 is unchanged in places to go excpet it terminates in Stanlet Fort.
(c) Rt 73 would be renamed as 67 & it goes through Ma Hang estate, but not Wong Ma Kok Road. Also, NWFB 374 would be cancelled.
(d) To unify the network, 399 would be operated by Citybus.
(e) An electronic interchange system would be introduced to all Stanley routes to allow passengers to interchange for a bus so they can go to any places between Deep Water Bay & Stanley wihout paying extra fare.
(f) Route 63 would be cancelled & 65 would also be operated by Citybus to unify the network. It would run 7 days a week. Passengers going from Stanley to Lei Tak estate can take an interchange at Wong Nei Chung Gap to take 41A.
This rearrangement saves about 10 buses yet increases passenger carrying capacity by about 15%.
(2) Reduction in number of Western routes
Citybus now has 8 routes in the West & is too many. So reduction in the number of routes is necessary to save buses & increase number of passengers carried by bus.
(a) Cancel 5 so only 10 is remained, but 10 would not go to Happy Valley.
(b) 5C is cancelled.
(c) 10X is cancelled.
(d) 5A is cancelled & 1 would extend to Kennedy Town, but electronic fare system must be set up to allow passengers pay less ($3.4) when they are not going up to places above Happy Valley (Lower) Terminus.
(e) Rt 47A would have Central Piers as terminus so people in Kennedy Town can have direct bu service to Central Piers. Its fare is lowered to $4.7 (whole trip), $3.4 (between Felix Villas & Central Piers) & electronic fare system is introduced to reduce cost of travelling to Felix Villas.
(f) Special departures from Sai Ying Poon are available during morning rush hours to ensure all people can take a bus.
(3) Reformation of Mid-Levels Bus Service
(a) NWFB 43 is cancelled & Citybus 40B would go through Chi Fu in both directions. Both 40A & 40B would have Tin Wan as terminus. This saves at least 5 buses & all passengers would have best service.
(b) NWFB Rt 23A would be cancelled as the demand for bus service from there to Causeway Bay is not that large.
(4) Reformation of Ap Lei Chau Routes
(a) Citybus Route 92 would be cancelled to prevent duplication as better 592 is available & there are very few passengers in 92.
(5) Reformation of Shau Kei Wan Routes
(a) NWFB M21 would be cancelled & 20 would be upgraded to full-AC M20, starting from Yiu Tung Estate, then Taikoo Shing & then follow the route of M21.
(b) Rt 2A would be cancelled & 2 would be air-conditionized, with Yiu Tung as terminus.
(3) Rt 720 would be cancelled. Rt 722 would start from Yiu Tung, then go to Taikoo Shing. This only spends extra 3 minutes, but saves 10 buses & improves its profitability.
Thanks for any comments on my suggestion!!
Reply for the rearrangement of island rt
BusBus (email@example.com) from p38-max3.syd.ihug.com.au at Tue Sep 29 15:14, 1998 said:
I just want to reply CITYBUS 10 suggestion for Stanley bus routes only,
can u next time give out meaningful idea, please!!!!!!!!
why 399, 63, 65 had to give to CITYBUS to operate??????
why dont CITYBUS give 6, 6A, 6X, 73, 260 to NWFB to operate????? I am very interested in this
Also if u not sure about the name of the road in Stanley district please dont type it out,
do u know where is Wong Ma Kok Road???? It is where the road link between Stanley Village to Stanley
I just want to ask that why I now in Sydney I know this but u r in HK but u dont know?????
The road link between Repulse Bay and Stanley is STANLEY GAP ROAD ar, u dont know ar??? why a
person in Sydney know but u dont know?????
Also u said use 12metres bus to operate the Stanley route???
is that this bus just service between Ma Hang and Stanley???
How can this 12metres bus can go out to Repluse Bay and Deep Water Bay via Repulse Bay Road, Deep
Water Bay Road and wong Nai Chung Gap Road????
From a person who had USE STANLEY BUS SERVICES CONTINOUSLY FOR 5 YEARS
29.09.98----16:57 in Sydney replying the NAME OF THE ROAD FOR A HK GUY!!!!!!
Article 24: (Request 1)
U havent reply me about the road of WONG MA KOK ROAD!!!!!!!
REPLY TO ME LA, I AM IN SYDNEY NOW AR, TELL ME LA CITYBUS 10, U R IN HK MA
> Citybus 10 (firstname.lastname@example.org) said:
> please don't open a new thread for an old topic as this wastes a lot of hard disk space in the server, increasing the change of hanging down!!
> Citybus 10