Today's Articles: 44.
Articles' Numbers: (19980904_01-44)
Article 1:
Re: 紅豪出o黎啦！
GC 2875 (loks@netteens.net) from imsp013.netvigator.com at Thu Sep 3 18:38, 1998 said:
> ATR1~~~HJ2127 (trident@powernethk.com) said:
> 紅豪出o黎啦！
>
> 昨日﹙準確D應該說昨晚﹚，小弟落街買Do野，在非常無聊的情況下，
> 去o左朗屏村巴士站。
> 忽然有部95R's VOLVO Olympian，細看之下~~~咦？紅色？？？
> 原來，KCRC紅豪出o左o黎啦
> (233~~HV8146 *好似*)
>
> ATR1~~~HJ2127
> S3N121~~~DP5782
o岩呀!車牌正確.今日行95R頭車.
Article 2:
Re: 新巴八號 Trident 服務時間
Claymon (wang5@hknet.com) from mp1811.hknet.com at Thu Sep 3 21:08, 1998 said:
> AA1234 (id00639@netvigator.com) said:
> 今日下午5:30P.M,於柴灣西等R.T:8新記新車,足足等了一小時,一架
> 都無,激到我上了架8X,有無板友可以話我知R.T:8幾時有新記新車.
> 大約2:00P.M左右都見有幾架,真激氣!
新巴 Trident 只會在非 8P 服務時段才行 8 號(約十點到四點左右),
夜晚就唔清楚囉. 因 8 號 Trident 是用 8P 車行(即 1001-1008).
而今日我發覺 1001-1008 上斜情況是不錯的, 反而 1018 就好唔掂,
唔知係咪 1001-1008 是 tune 過, 專為 8 號而設?
搭行 8 號 Trident (1003) 的智叔
Article 2: (Request 1)
> Claymon (wang5@hknet.com) said:
> 新巴 Trident 只會在非 8P 服務時段才行 8 號(約十點到四點左右),
> 夜晚就唔清楚囉.
夜晚Trident行完8P返廠.
Article 2: (Request 2)
> DA54 (da54@netteens.net) said:
>
> 激乜鬼氣？
> 這些車是行8P的, 5:30pm當然冇喇！
> 要搭? 請在8P上下午服務時間的中間時間等啦！
8P操車用單層,應該用單層,D客都比城記拉曬啦!取消8P,開番條類似80,用
新車行,反而可以拉番城記D客!
Article 2: (Request 3)
> 龍神丸 (clement@hkplanet.com) said:
> 咁又唔係喎...我係總站睇過3班8P, 都有起碼30人上車...到興發街
> 差不多冇位坐喎...
係呀! 真係搵多個位都無.
> 8P既對手似乎係788...788做中環灣仔客, 8P做灣仔銅鑼灣客...
始終 788 快好多, 8P 0既客路有分別.
> 不過都應開番80號....會用新車既...如有車既話
今日新巴高層表示爭取 8P 改全日.
我個人較贊成開 80X , 即 8P 路線但經長命斜;
8P 則保留或改經 788 柴灣一段路. 始終非繁時 8P 路線唔夠客架.
總括來說, 柴灣人對 8P 都甚為喜歡, 常說比 8X 快很多,
只要 8P/建議80X 繁時加密小小再玩聯合班次, 實掂啦!
智叔
Article 2: (Request 4)
我今日四點三響灣仔上左部 1006！跟住有幾部 Trident！
Article 2: (Request 5)
我今早見1008行111!!
GU8933
Article 3:
Re: 新巴城巴九巴數問
cky (kyfchiu@netvigator.com) from hhtck005021.netvigator.com at Fri Sep 4 00:17, 1998 said:
> Walter Kwong (h9816113@hkusua.hku.hk) said:
> 1 新巴是不是跳飛機？
可看這裏。 :)
> 2 619 假日係城巴自己玩晒定同九城一齊？
九、城
> 3 690 有冇九巴冷馬？我淨係見到勁多 3BL
有o架!
> 4 8P 行 Dart 定 Trident？
躉! (未開前的試車/展覽就係達)
> 5 2500 係咪 8X 字軌？
一時時o乍喎, 我諗柴、小板友會清楚o的。
今日見 新1004 行 22:50鯽魚涌開o既 116o既
cky
Article 3: (Request 1)
> 1 新巴是不是跳飛機？
司機及車均行字軌, 但亦有特殊情況, 如 8 號交更因車返唔切而
被迫跳飛機. (有車就渣)
將來就不知了....
Article 3: (Request 2)
> Eddie Lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:
>
> 梗係九城啦.
>
>
> 當然有冷馬啦, 熱狗得三架之嘛.
>
>
> Trident.
>
>
> 冇出好耐喎.
第五點我知: 今早見2500行 90號線
Article 3: (Request 3)
尋日見2500行10, 今日響課室望出街外見到2500返鴨利洲.
Article 3: (Request 4)
> Walter Kwong (h9816113@hkusua.hku.hk) said:
>
> 但我五點響小西灣見到佢行 8X
奇怪, 五點十我見到佢係魚則魚涌向中環方向
行10X.
Article 3: (Request 5)
咁即係 2500 今日行 10X -> 90 -> 8X 囉!
(可能唔只)
今曰 2500 行 8X, 見到車尾寫 10X 的智叔
Article 4:
Re: 好大喜功 易招滅亡 運吉有責任
AL118(FF1819).不良牛 (rainbowg@netvigator.com) from 202.40.137.101 at Fri Sep 4 12:37, 1998 said:
> Louis (louis@hkabc.net) said:
>
> 睇完蘋果的報導後, 發覺城巴己走入一個完全自我的境界, 日日自我
> 吹虛, 無力接受新時代來臨的「現實」.
>
> 城巴有今時今日的路線佔有率, 根本並唔係靠自己的實力, 只係運輸
> 署每兩三年就以檯底形式俾D中巴線佢! 咁同一個乞錢乞到發達的乞
> 兒有乜分別? 當然, 我地一定要承認城巴做乞兒係有一手! 若果運輸
> 署唔係在九五年同今年過左近三十條線俾佢, 城巴今時今日都係做
> 「呀二」咋!
就連運輸署分配站坑時都係幫住城巴, 例如東涌地鐵站的S51, 機場地
面運輸中心個總站, 都係偏幫城巴!
仲有小西灣條前80坑, 運吉話條坑兩間公司都冇份, 但係城巴有稽查
就可以用(咁即係默認俾城巴, 即是說: 城巴一條半路線用兩條坑, 新
巴五條線都係用兩條坑!), 新巴卻無權使用, 到新巴投訴話唔夠
坑同埋城巴阻住巴士埋站時, 運吉又話之你死! (到城巴投訴其他公司
時,運吉就會干預!)
當初如果運吉唔係俾26線俾城巴而係俾捷達時, 可能會另有一番景象!
>
> 而李伯又叫新巴唔好掀起減價戰, 好明顯, 城巴已是未戰先輸, 唔敢
> 接受挑戰! 當新巴同城巴出現直接競爭時, 城巴一定會用「歇斯底里」
> 式出車法來反抗. 唔理有冇人搭, 總之狂出車, 這個是城巴往時常用
> 的戰術. 就算對手唔出手城巴自己的會蝕到「趴o係度」.
>
> 另外, 新巴效應比往時的城巴效應更加犀利. 記得九月二日的蘋果訪
> 問了一位剛搭完新巴的乘客, 一樣的巴士, 一樣的司機, 中巴的站牌...
> 個乘客都可俾到七至八分. 這個訪問, 完全反應了部份香港人唔經大
> 腦的行為. 但係呢種行為, 就為新巴帶來了不少方便. 城巴的優勢已
> 經不復再.
咁又係, 我有次等M21回家, 有對母子響度等780/788, 架車來了, 個
細路扭計話要坐新巴, 唔坐城巴(九月一日前卻話唔坐中巴坐城巴), 所
以城巴優勢已經不再!
>
>
> 我冇聽錯嗎? 兩年半? 乜唔係兩年咩?
> 好明顯又多左半年囉! 到下個月又話開線唔夠車, 慢慢又變三年了...
城巴當初就係用呢個原因(接中巴14線)延遲替換坡柴!
> 所以愛搭熱狗的同志放心, 中巴的普通巴士不會咁快退下火線! :)
>
>
> 而家新巴所用的車, 有部份都係李伯在當年在中巴買的.
> 唔通真係「廢人買廢車」?
仲有, 最初城巴承諾機場啟用後全用低地台巴士行E線, 但
直至現在, 東涌同赤立角的城巴E線, 舉目皆見都係Volvo,
唔通............
>
>
>
>
> Louis
Article 4: (Request 1)
> Citybus 10 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) said:
> I agree with this Lyndon Rees' saying.As you can see,the Citybus routes on the Pokfulam Road are all air-conditioned.Not only this,the fare are much lower than those AC services of NWFB.When you take a comparison between CTB37 series & NWFB 4X,you would find the fare of CTB37 series are as low as $4.7,while NWFB 4X is $6.2,and the seating on Citybus are much better.The seatings on Citybus are wide and ergonomic,but not for NWFB.
事實上新巴一部份冷氣巴士車費的確俾城巴高，但阿李生又叫佢「唔好
減價」喎，呵呵......
唔知出年佢又會唔會主動叫新巴加價呢？
> When talking about the suicide action of NWFB,I have to say this is truth.Take the example of routes in Kennedy Town.The Citybus routes there have much larger demand becaues of good routing.This can be proved by the amount of passengers in 5B.But the routing of NWFB18 is not quite good.It goes to North Point via Island Corridor,but not the busiest area of Wan Chai & Causeway Bay.So it would not have many passengers no matter how cheap it is.Crazy discount on it is just a suicide action!
呢個就要怪運輸署啦，好o野就俾晒城巴。
不過你認為一百個港島客入面，真係可以做到80個坐城巴？2號同8號
一轉全冷，77同99會唔見幾多客？8P一轉全日，780又會唔見幾多銅鑼
灣客？城巴而家已經輸o左個勢，至少一向較中巴有優勢o既公關工作
而家已經完完全全咁俾新巴比下去，學Louis咁講，一樣o既巴士同一
樣o既司機，接近一樣o既服務有不同o既結果。對手不同，但係有人仍
然唔肯面對現實。
> Even this,the demand for bus services among HK Islanders are much higher than it was 5 years ago.In the past,AC buses were still uncommon,so the demand for AC buses was not so large.But nowadays the Islanders are tempered so they need AC buses as standard.
定係有公司不自量力，無車都開線，所以平均每年先退得廿架坡柴？
我都認為新巴開線時要自量o下，唔好係又開唔係又開。開幾條長途
線幫補o下係好o既，但係車夠唔夠呢？響改善現有服務同投入資源開
線之間應有個平衡點。
Article 4: (Request 2)
> Colin Chang (kalim@netvigator.com) said:
> 【引自蘋果，04/09/98】
>
> 城巴董事總經理李日新表示，新巴此要求是「貪心的渴求」，他指
> 出新巴的首要任務應是「盡快淘汰既古老又垃圾的巴士」，但他仍
> 不忘表示「要在兩年內購入五百輛空調巴士，簡直是奇跡」，他揚
> 言，以城巴的全空調車隊和較低票價，市場佔有率可輕易由現在七
> 成增至八成。他警告若新巴掀起減價，只會是割喉自殺。
睇完蘋果的報導後, 發覺城巴己走入一個完全自我的境界, 日日自我
吹虛, 無力接受新時代來臨的「現實」.
城巴有今時今日的路線佔有率, 根本並唔係靠自己的實力, 只係運輸
署每兩三年就以檯底形式俾D中巴線佢! 咁同一個乞錢乞到發達的乞
兒有乜分別? 當然, 我地一定要承認城巴做乞兒係有一手! 若果運輸
署唔係在九五年同今年過左近三十條線俾佢, 城巴今時今日都係做
「呀二」咋!
而李伯又叫新巴唔好掀起減價戰, 好明顯, 城巴已是未戰先輸, 唔敢
接受挑戰! 當新巴同城巴出現直接競爭時, 城巴一定會用「歇斯底里」
式出車法來反抗. 唔理有冇人搭, 總之狂出車, 這個是城巴往時常用
的戰術. 就算對手唔出手城巴自己的會蝕到「趴o係度」.
另外, 新巴效應比往時的城巴效應更加犀利. 記得九月二日的蘋果訪
問了一位剛搭完新巴的乘客, 一樣的巴士, 一樣的司機, 中巴的站牌...
個乘客都可俾到七至八分. 這個訪問, 完全反應了部份香港人唔經大
腦的行為. 但係呢種行為, 就為新巴帶來了不少方便. 城巴的優勢已
經不復再.
> 新巴企業傳訊助理總經理關則輝則回應說「城巴明顯是擔憂要面對
> 新巴這個強勁對手......車隊唔怕舊最緊要多，以增加班次爭取乘
> 客，新巴舊車淘汰舊車的速度會很快，兩年半內會全面空調化，而
> 城巴則用了五年」
我冇聽錯嗎? 兩年半? 乜唔係兩年咩?
好明顯又多左半年囉! 到下個月又話開線唔夠車, 慢慢又變三年了...
所以愛搭熱狗的同志放心, 中巴的普通巴士不會咁快退下火線! :)
> 1) 某公司響九四九五年仍然操作大量「既古老又垃圾的巴士」時，
> 又或在九七至九八年間年嚴重缺車時，仍不忘爭取開辦大量新線或
> 接辦舊線。現第二間公司作出類似行為，則話人家o既要求係「貪心
> 的渴求」，上o左岸莫非就真係神仙？最貪心究竟係邊個？
而家新巴所用的車, 有部份都係李伯在當年在中巴買的.
唔通真係「廢人買廢車」?
Louis
Article 4: (Request 3)
咁又奇喎. 我想知城巴由九三年起接辦路線起, 至坡柴全數退役咁多年來,
城巴又開左幾多新線, 食左幾多中巴舊線呢? 我想一定多過新巴申請開辦
o既兩條線啦?! 咁點解城巴唔退晒 D 坡柴先開線呢? 係咪坡柴得一百架,
退得快 D (實際上都唔快喎, 要接近五年!) 就可以快 D 開線呢?
等我計一計先. 新巴兩年內有 500 架新車, 即係每個月平均應有
500/24=20.83333 架車. 但城巴就揚言每月有 40 部新車, 比新巴
o既要求高達一倍! 既然新巴o既目標係奇蹟, 咁城巴o既目標係咪神蹟呢?
會唔會係指一條街上面, 10 架巴士埋站有 7-8 架係城巴呢?
Article 4: (Request 4)
可能他的意思是：未來Dennis或Volvo要應付九記和城記的訂單，要
再在兩年內交付多五百架新車會有困難吧。
(Dennis今年真係發過豬頭囉...)
近年經濟低迷，新記的熱狗服務應仍有需求。
始終不贊成管理層“下巴輕輕', 太早宣佈一些未必能做到的事.
有可能關先生不預期未來可能會突然有其他新線經營，又或者新
車交貨期一定準時吧。
Article 4: (Request 5)
VA36 Wrote:
雖然比較直接，但有道理 ！
Article 5:
Re: 點樣先可以在交易廣場影到好相？
Gary Tang (purity2@hkstar.com) from hhtck005085.netvigator.com at Thu Sep 3 21:08, 1998 said:
> LM3 (angela05@netvigator.com) said:
> 交易廣場都好黑，點樣影到美麗的相？
> 感謝大家幫忙！！
>
> LM3
最好用腳架,
傻瓜機: night scene, no flash.
單鏡機: program / 200 度菲林,光圈 4.5,快門 1/2 秒.
sample
http://home.hkstar.com/~purity2/dc10-262.jpg
PS. 小心有車出坑.
Article 5: (Request 1)
簡單! 曝光兼用腳架.
Article 5: (Request 2)
將光圈校到1左右,就可以映到,唔使三腳架,
而快門就可以校到60左右(但我當時用左125快門),有相可睇:
由於我仍未熟習使用scanner,scan上來的唔係幾好.
Cityflyer A11
2138 K.Y.Chung
Article 5: (Request 3)
用單鏡機的B門放一至兩秒便行了!
(ps:我試用此方法影夜相,真係可行!不過部
機要落腳架,定好部機喎!
Article 6:
Re: 新記Dart 的數字牌
Schneider 1010 (schneide@netvigator.com) from hhtuhn04140.netvigator.com at Thu Sep 3 21:54, 1998 said:
> 蔥角 (chunkwok@hkstar.com) said:
> 20xx 的電子數字， 出兩個字好似已經好盡, 唔知出三個字or 四
> 個字時會9唔會有問題呢....
出到三個字0架,我見過打M21
Schneider
1010
Article 6: (Request 1)
> 蔥角 (chunkwok@hkstar.com) said:
>
> 咁o的字係咪窄o左呢? since 我見, 出 78 時, 已經冇晒位了...
> :D
係呀! 所以佢M21時個M字係窄到中間貼得好埋。
cky
Article 6: (Request 2)
> Claymon (wang5@hknet.com) said:
> 咁當然啦, 數字牌係可以因應出字多寡控制字體大小,
> 我今日見 106 行 Trident , 尾車都係 1 字佔小0的,
> 06 佔多0的(雖然我講係Trident :) )
係呀, 呢個電子牌係用 Varible Width Font,
兩個位時的字體較闊.
--
車匙!
Article 7:
Re: Citybus Single Doors on 307,962
Citybus 10 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from ustsu18-nc1.ust.hk at Fri Sep 4 10:36, 1998 said:
> 大埔居民 (makhome@netteens.net) said:
> 大家覺得城巴用單門Leyland Olympian 11M行專利線(如307,962...)好不好?
> 有冇不方便的地方呢?
> 請討論.
This is a good poilcy as passengers are almost guaranteed to have a seat in such long trips,while most people would take off only at places near the destination.So single door doesn't matter.
>
> 另外,第一部城巴單門Trident是那部?
>
> 大埔居民
Article 7: (Request 1)
呢個好視乎那條線的客量和會否出現同一車站有不少乘客上和落.
962應無大問題, 8X, 307 就...
(登車前請留意, 不少車是無企位的, 就算有也只是十大個)
Article 7: (Request 2)
如果轉返做專利車就可以有企位啦.
Article 7: (Request 3)
雖然每架巴士都有企位限額，但實際上有幾多個乘客和師傅們會理會
那個企位限額。如雞車話企 5-7 人，DD 唔俾企人，但在繁忙時間咪一
樣頂閘超載，但又曾幾何時會被抄牌呢？
小弟只曾親眼見過 51 師傅因企 o左 3 個人而勸告乘客勿上車。
5D 德褔花園 往 紅磡 （循環線）
主要途經：麗晶花園，啟德機場貨運站，土瓜灣，黃埔花園
Article 8:
Re: MB 攪 105A
SuperBuzz Sydney (dccheng@acs.itd.uts.edu.au) from kauri10.itd.uts.edu.au at Fri Sep 4 11:15, 1998 said:
> 蔥角 (chunkwok@hkstar.com) said:
> 以前中記行親 105A 都攪到黑媽媽..
> 不過近日見有o架MB, 都好攪o野, 攪 0 5 A 再加 105A 塊牌..
> 既可以唔駛攪到漆黑一片, 勉強又可以畀人知道架車行乜線,
> 都幾好諗頭..
> btw, 都係 105A 可以咁攪咋..第二o的線就唔得咯....
I have seen a VA done that at Macau Ferry.
Article 8: (Request 1)
cky (kyfchiu@netvigator.com) said:
> 佢最初開線時都已是這樣喇, 不過係好多時o的師傅偷懶o者。
奇怪, 乜仲有 MB 行 105A?! 唔係轉晒 ML 咩?
仲有, 而家 D ML 字軌亦有攪 000 o既.
Article 8: (Request 2)
有! 至少上星期六朝我晌紅磡火車站仲見有兩、三架MB。
cky
Article 9:
Re: 九巴網頁可能有大改變?
龍神丸 (clement@hkplanet.com) from c9.hkplanet.com at Thu Sep 3 23:17, 1998 said:
> Ken Fung (kenf@hkstar.com) said:
> 今日手痕, 試下入 www.kmb.com.hk 睇睇, 點知竟然 Contacting
> host: www.kmb.com.hk... 之後我再 trace 下到底係去邊, 最後
> 係去到 2E1-HKIX.hk.linkage.net . 九巴網頁一向放響
> hkstar.com, 而家 domain name point 左去 linkage, 即係可能
> 九巴網頁會搬去 linkage 而且大革新. linkage 出品一向唔差,
> 如果真係 linkage 攪, 噉樣九巴及新巴網頁就有得鬥囉. ^_^
>
> Ken
KMB個ip 係202.76.33.33
而trace之後Starting trace....
Tracing to www.kmb.com.hk [202.76.33.33]....
Hops IP Address RTT(ms) DNS Name
1 203.85.16.8 166 hkplanet.com
2 203.85.16.254 136 r01.hkplanet.com
3 202.76.1.251 289 lay.hk.linkage.net
4 202.76.1.251 288 lay.hk.linkage.net
5 203.85.135.161 452
...
大家有冇發覺kmb放響hkstar個方法同cmb當年放既方法一樣.
都不以xxx.com.hk作domain name...
好期望有好野睇呀~
Article 9: (Request 1)
> anthony LAM (lsf@hknet.com) said:
>
>
> 但我早於有了www.cmb.com.hk的時候,已經試過去www.kmb.com.hk,
> 那時已經是有得connecting.....,但至今已經很多個月,仍未有動
> 靜,真令人費解.
個 '杜明' 好耐好耐之前以經Set 好, 只係唔用來放嘩嘩嘩
罷了, 不過就用來對內對外收發電郵之類。
暫時未聽過話會在呢個 '杜明' 起嘩嘩嘩, 不過就算
起好, 條快過Modem 冇幾多的 Link 都可能頂唔蒲...
Piccolo
Article 9: (Request 2)
其實會唔會係有人hold住,炒domain之類,
或九巴持有,但星光不批准使用自己的domain?
Article 10:
Re: 新巴? 城巴? 都係新巴
AL118(FF1819) (rainbowg@netvigator.com) from 254048.hkabc.net at Thu Sep 3 21:00, 1998 said:
> T.P.T. (dckk@netteens.net) said:
> 今日放學出香港仔, 返歸時等車返屋企, 見到48,71埋站,
> 我都係... 唔搭, 諗住搭新記車, 點知兩分鐘後又有48
> 埋站, 我都唔搭, 響站頭就有一位小朋友同一位師奶, 位
> 師奶係咁叫個小朋友上車, 個細路就話唔搭城巴呀, 我要
> 搭新巴! 真係攪笑.. 再一分鐘後一架78(#2007)入站, 我
> 同佢地上o左車, 開車開o左一陣, 個細路又係咁嚷著要食
> 野, 個師傅好好聲氣開咪話「呢度唔可以食野o架」, 哈!
> 未上到黃竹坑, 後面架78(#2001)又追到o黎.
>
> 今日另見: DM10仍然有中巴o的字同埋旗仔, 行38
Also DL2 still have CMB logo and letters and in route 2A today!
>
> .....
> T.P.T.
Article 10: (Request 1)
今日係港澳, 見到D工程部的人貼貼紙, 見一架'噤'一架....
ML12, VA61同VA57慘遭毒手, 並發現新記搞左D新野:
長黑色貼紙同細長方銀色貼紙俾銀豪用, 仲有新的新巴貼紙(Logo大D)
有架DL埋站, 站長話:果架又有渦! 0甘個師傅就拿拿林桶油
(係油,唔係貼紙)油油油.....旗仔就拜拜lo.....
另: 有好多新巴banner廣告, 仲好惹笑添!
Article 10: (Request 2)
有中巴 Logo 及字樣車 list:
DM10
DL2
LF265
DS15 (一邊)
請繼續.
Article 10: (Request 3)
Will DL1 & DL2 be purchased by 必達?
So NFB will not 遮去中巴Logo?
Article 11:
Re: 城記DENNIS DRAGON 12M一問
Claymon (wang5@hknet.com) from mp1811.hknet.com at Thu Sep 3 20:59, 1998 said:
> LM3 (angela05@netvigator.com) said:
> 衣排Ｄ8XX是否大部分落左去8X，788，780？
係0既, 大約 60 架到啦(加118)!
不過 8X, 118, 788 都係佔條線本身一半左右, 其餘用 4xx-6xx, 9xx-10xx.
780 才差不多全用巨龍(即 15 部用 14 部咁).
> 點解96，97等等大部分用左6XX，2201，4XX，
> 連99,171都是這樣
> 今天只見到兩架8XX行！
> 點解？
用巨龍行柴灣道長命斜好力些嘛!
智叔
Article 11: (Request 1)
講開dragon 12M, 尋晚見870行592線.
Article 11: (Request 2)
係呀! 成隊8XX龍過o左東區。包括8X的87x, 81x及780的85x, 83x
但846在72
有架8xx行671
Article 11: (Request 3)
Yes!CTB rt.780,788 have 8XX to runs rt.780,788!
But I don't like 8XX runs rt.780,788!
VA51 TONG HN8481
LV97 CM7009
NWFB already...
Article 12:
Re: 21xx 及 22xx 的異同
LM3 (angela05@netvigator.com) from imsp038.netvigator.com at Thu Sep 3 23:28, 1998 said:
> Elvis (s966285@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) said:
> 城記兩種車 (2100系及2200系)都是 Dennis Trident, 不知兩種巴士
> 有何相同和相異的地方？
I think the electronic display MAY be same.
but the bodys are different.2100 is Duple...2200 is Alexander
Article 12: (Request 1)
佢講緊 2100 系同 2200 系喎!
2100 系係豪華躉, 專為機場線而設. 2200 系就係普通躉, 一般路線都適合.
Article 12: (Request 2)
佢 講 緊 係 2100-series 同 2200-series 喎 !
答 案 好 簡 單 :
2100-series 係 機 場 版 . ( Airbus )
2200-series 係 城 市 版 . ( Omnibus )
Article 13:
Re: 邊度先有陽光？
肥榮 (s967798@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) from earth.csc.cuhk.edu.hk at Fri Sep 4 01:50, 1998 said:
> 滅字豪鬼 (adagatha@netvigator.com) said:
> 邊度先有陽光----巴士呢？
>
> 尋找陽光的
> 滅字豪鬼
上水火車站旁的巴士站
Article 13: (Request 1)
軒尼詩道就有喇, 風間同學! :P
不過應該係返/放工時間至有. 在下放工五六點左右會見到陽光巴士響東行線
出現.
o係愛群道返工、分分鐘見過你o既
Mike NG(CMB-LF126)
Article 14:
Re: 新記Banner逐個捉！
AL118(FF1819).布甸狗 (rainbowg@netvigator.com) from 202.40.137.101 at Fri Sep 4 11:49, 1998 said:
> 滅字豪鬼 (adagatha@netvigator.com) said:
> 新記究竟貼左幾多種Banner落熱狗呢？
>
> 數數佢呢：
>
> 1）一切從新開始（Hard sell到......）
>
> 2）請多多指教（乘客熱線。）
>
> 3）屏息以待（環保偈，多貼在寶寶車尾。）
鴨車尾都有!
>
> 4）重認唔認得我（車身清潔，幾得意。）
>
> 5）每架舊巴，都夢想成為一架新巴（正呀！邊個稔架？）
(多貼在雞寶同鴨鴨上)
>
> 重有無呢？
6) This bus have ears.........Hotline 21368888
應該仲有, 請繼續!
>
> 唔鍾意Banner都覺得喜歡的
> 滅字豪鬼
見到1001行M21的不良牛!
Article 14: (Request 1)
> 5）每架舊巴，都夢想成為一架新巴（正呀！邊個稔架？）
嘩！呢句可圈可點！
可以係「新舊」(指車齡)，又可以係讀咩少少，變為「新九」(公司)：
「每架『九』巴，都夢想成為一架新巴」
Article 15:
Re: 新記躉真係...
SuperBuzz Sydney (dccheng@acs.itd.uts.edu.au) from kauri10.itd.uts.edu.au at Fri Sep 4 11:03, 1998 said:
> Someone! (cyll@netvigator.com) said:
> 一、新記躉又話有特低地台，又話好方便傷殘人仕，
> 但係一講到要坐輪椅的人仕，就認真煩師傅喇！
> 又要噤制，然後又要走出去揭起塊板，
> 上左車，又要再揭板、噤制。
> 睇下城記、九記的躉，塊板電動架！
Electronic ramps are really expensive ga, and you tell me how
many wheelchairs get on a bus in one day. It's just an easy
and econmical way of wheelchair access.
> 二、新記躉唔應該用電子牌呀，因為好多師傅以前用布牌嘛，
> 一下子就要轉用電子牌，都幾麻煩！
> 就好似個晚咁，搞個 N8 都唔掂，你又點睇？
First Bus got to build up a good image in order to fight with
Citybus. Therefore, they introduce some 'advanced technology'
for the reason. At least most people think they are nice
technology...
Article 15: (Request 1)
城記(如MAN)車連斜板都沒有安裝呢！
呢樣東西是要時間適應和學懂，懂得用後其實仲方便過用布牌，
而且巴士公司也以後不用更換布牌了，長遠來說用電子牌是可以
減少浪費和省回一點裝造新布牌的金錢．
Bruce
Article 16:
61X仲行荃灣路?
Flying Chuk (chuk@netvigator.com) from hhtcm011119.netvigator.com at Thu Sep 3 19:46, 1998 said:
我亞碼話我知今日佢架61X由九龍城(4:00PM)
返屯門,竟然架61X冇行汀九橋,行返荃灣路
喎?真奇.有冇板友知何解61X仲行荃灣路?
(據我亞媽講個架係2+3泠馬)
今日首日上課的
飛機竺^.^
Article 16: (Request 1)
It was because there is wind power test in Ting Kau Bridge
between 3:00pm to 4:00pm. Therefore, all the bus routes
which via Ting Kau Bridge, include 61X, 62X, 269B, 269C,
E34, 960, 961, 968 and 969 will used Tuen Mun Highway and
Tsuen Wan Road to go to Kowloon. The close of Ting Kau
Bridge is just temporary.
Benjamin
AD239-GN921
921-GW2858
Article 16: (Request 2)
運輸署說61X等路線將於兩個月內改經新汀九橋。
Article 17:
編定晒
anthony LAM (lsf@hknet.com) from 202.67.228.151 at Thu Sep 3 19:14, 1998 said:
> 269B (cmlai@hknet.com) said:
> 請問九巴司傅取車係公司規定取邊架,定係先到先得揀?
九巴是由公司派更部預先編定車輛俾車長去渣的.
Article 17: (Request 1)
九巴唔係行掛牌制咩?
架車行死一條線(大部分)
Article 18:
Re: 中記Web Site用到何時？？
SuperBuzz Sydney (dccheng@acs.itd.uts.edu.au) from kauri06.itd.uts.edu.au at Thu Sep 3 18:47, 1998 said:
> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:
> Or will it just be left on the Internet instead of being closed down?
> (As a disposed item, or perhaps the sign of CMB's long-living spirit! ^_^)
Or perhaps they are serious in getting back some bus business.
Article 19:
Re: Who's the bodybuilder?
Citybus 10 (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from ustsu18-nc1.ust.hk at Fri Sep 4 12:50, 1998 said:
> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:
> Does anybody know the bodybuilder of this bus?
>
> 
>
> It looks like a Citybus MAN single decker, huh? ^_^
>
> P.S. The bus is actually a Mercedes Benz O405NH, even though I'm not sure where the photo was taken! (Sigh!)
It is quite likely that the body is built by Volagen,because of the presence of destination display at the top of the left side and the steeply rising lower window frame.
Article 20:
問新記1001行過的路線及VA63一問
AL118(FF1819).不良牛 (rainbowg@netvigator.com) from 202.40.137.101 at Fri Sep 4 11:43, 1998 said:
如題!
究竟1001行過邊條路線?
以我所見, 有N8,8,8P同埋今日的M21!
請問仲有冇? 希望有人答到我! Thank you!
仲有一個問題, VA63翻裝車頂之後, 以下設備同其他車有什麼不同:
1. 車窗及車窗內框
2. 冷氣頂棚及風口
3. 座椅
4. 係唔係用穗景車身
謝謝!
今朝見到1001行M21嚇到腳仔軟的不良牛!
Article 20: (Request 1)
> AL118(FF1819).不良牛 (rainbowg@netvigator.com) said:
> 究竟1001行過邊條路線?
> 以我所見, 有N8,8,8P同埋今日的M21!
昨天行111.
Ricky Chan
Article 21:
Brisbane to body their own buses
SuperBuzz Sydney (dccheng@acs.itd.uts.edu.au) from kauri10.itd.uts.edu.au at Fri Sep 4 11:32, 1998 said:
The following is found at the Australasian Bus & Coach Magazine Online.
Brisbane City Council is exploring Alternative
The Brisbane city council is exploring alternative body
supply techniques for its new buses. The council is still
taking delivery of Austral pacific low floor bodies on Volvo
B10BLE chassis. However the council is exploring the possibility
of assembling bodies from kits, as is done by Singapore bus
service.
The council has advanced discussions with Volgren which has
experiences supplying kits into Asia as well as to a previous
contract with Brisbane council.
-------
Too bad they didn't mention Hong Kong, perhaps the City of Life
is still not famous enough!!
Article 21: (Request 1)
The following article is also extracted from the Australasian Bus & Coach Magazine Online:
New Bus Depot Boosts Public Transport
A new bus depot was officially opened by the Minister for
Transport, Murray Criddle on Thursday 3 September. Owned
and built by Perth's largest private bus operator, PATH Transit,
the depot is situated in Triumph Ave, Wangara and will services a
large part of Perth's north eastern suburbs.
One of the only Transperth operators to actually build an own its
own depot, PATH Transit sees the initiative as a necessary part of
its commitment to Perths public transport system.
PATH Transit is a relative newcomer to Perth, commencing
operations in September 1996. This wholly owned Australian
company is part of the progressive ATE group which is well
known for its commitment to public transport Australia-wide.
PATH Transit is now the largest Perth bus operator, with a
market share of 35%, and has become an integral part of the
Transperth system.
Two years ago PATH Transit won the Marmion and Wanneroo
bus contracts, going on, in April this year it was successful in its
bid for the Morley contract, which saw the company employ an
additional 170 staff, on top of its existing 320 and took its total
number of buses to 312.
The new Wangara depot alone will employ 37 staff, including
drivers, maintenance and operating staff. Initially it will house 27
buses but has the capacity to take up to 60.
Article 22:
Re: 邊度仲有新巴,城巴單張有取?
Bruce Li (bruceli@vcn.bc.ca) from 202.67.228.180 at Fri Sep 4 11:51, 1998 said:
> KSMBH ADS9 (shumky@netvigator.com) said:
> 請問小西灣有冇?
你試下到訪各港島區民政事務處，若你住在東區，可到西灣河東區
法院那間，若他們已派完的話，我都有多幾張，到時你再Email問
我取吧！
Bruce
Article 23:
Re: [新聞點滴] 98/09/04
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) from human18.upnaway.com at Fri Sep 4 09:13, 1998 said:
> Gakei! (gakei@netvigator.com) said:
> 明報:
> 新巴城巴新戰場﹕機場線
Singtao Daily:
新巴爭辦南區機場線
Article 24:
Re: 你贊成新記rt.18增設【上環→北角】的分段
LF2 (BE 8749) (huil@genrad.com) from 132.223.232.153 at Fri Sep 4 02:07, 1998 said:
> rt.690 吳佩慈 Fans (kyy690@netvigator.com) said:
> 自從10A摺左後,新記話18代替10A,但收費個問題係收$4.20?
> 各位板友,你是否支持18增設由上環→北角的分段,收番$3.60
>
> *由北角去中環只需搭20、M21、88、309($3.60/$4.50)*
>
> rt.690 吳佩慈 Fans上
> 新巴車隊 VA-61~~~~~~HP 8961
I totally agree with it. I think it's fair to the passengers
in Sheung Wan/Central area.
LF2 (BE 8749)
Article 25:
Re: 新記租廠租到幾時+論文一篇之五
cky (kyfchiu@netvigator.com) from hhtck005021.netvigator.com at Fri Sep 4 00:42, 1998 said:
> 2138 K.Y.Chung (w3d080r@school.net.hk) said:
> 新記到而家都仲未有自己的車廠,咁新記會租中記的廠房
> 到幾時?會唔會用新細介發展買番來的地皮來起車廠?如
> 果係真,又會係邊度呢?始終新記而家都仲係用緊中記的
> 車廠,遲早都要全面撤走,用自己起的車廠.
新聞話佢會租柴廠三年。
其他就唔知喇... :(
> 1.新記話就話會接收所有中記員工,但係睇怕新
> 記係淘舊車的同時會淘汰埋中記的員工以注入
> 新血,因為中記員工俾人的印象都好衰.
又不可一竹篙打一船人o既, 但又係老問題,
好多人先入為主覺得前朝o既員工衰, 就算真係有改善,
但o的人始終都唔覺得啦!
> 2.新記用左三億來買晒中記的車輛,其實係一種
> 浪費金錢的行為.我唔係話唔買原中記的車,而應
> 該選擇性地購買.好似寶寶之類的舊車,新記買左
> 之後就話要幾個月之內淘汰晒,係咪浪費金錢?
無法, 既要維持以往班次, 又要在某些線上加車, 又話遲o的要
開新線, o的新車又未到, 加加埋埋, 佢點敢唔用住o的舊車喎?
> 3.新記話自己會買幾百部新車來代替二手的中記
> 車輛,其實毫無需要,因為新記大可以翻新中記的
> 冷馬,將內部整靚少少,再改埋2+2座位咪得囉!新
> 記甚至大可以將DM,LM改做冷馬,因為呢兩款車的
> 結構同冷馬版一樣,都唔使太大工程.
可能佢地覺得內部改裝唔係可以節省太多, 又不是迫切要做
(係都會顧車廂清潔先啦! 唔記得佢地點回應: 現時先重班次)
再加上 '成本與效益' 的考慮。
> 4.新記的站柱就全部都係新的,只不過有蓋的原中
> 記車站就仲未翻新.我知道記都仲未做到呢樣野(
> 城記的有蓋車站如果唔係自已起的話就係由中記
> 留落的,例如摩頓台同華富北.),如果新記係呢方
> 面領先城記的話就可以改善服務.
同3的原因差不多
> 5.新記係開檔時識執生,所以9月1號的巴士服務都
> 無問題,呢樣野就要讚新記聰明.而我近日坐新記
> 車時都發覺部車乾淨左好多,新記的確有大進步.
> 論文一篇之論巴士公司系列到此結束,多謝網友
> 花時間閱讀.
你是指新記新車、原前朝車, 還是兩樣都是?
明早又要一早仆返公司開會的
cky -_-
Article 26:
DA,LA,VA,DL.........等有可能油新巴色
Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) from hhtam023189.netvigator.com at Thu Sep 3 22:12, 1998 said:
> 蔥角 (chunkwok@hkstar.com) said:
> 唔知新記會唔會將中記而家o的車油過晒佢, 仲
> 要油埋個波浪紋呢...
> btw, 係的話我都覺得好應該,
> 不過唔知會唔會改埋o的冷馬o既坐椅做絲絨..係就....:~~~咯...
DA,LA,VA,DL....等有可能會油新巴顏色,至於LF,LV...等車因為
年事已高(成二十幾年車齡),新巴話會響三個月內將車齡高既巴士
淘汰,相信唔會將LF,LV....等車油色
至於會唔會改埋o的冷馬o既坐椅做絲絨.......呢個工程可能太大
喇
Article 27:
Re: 問網主:點解唔見左'板友代表車'?
Ken Fung (kenf@hkstar.com) from 202.68.58.226 at Thu Sep 3 21:34, 1998 said:
> Tony Lai (HE7489) (shuhang@netvigator.com) said:
> 點解唔見左'板友代表車'?雖然'板友代表車'是一個小玩意...
我幾日前已經宣佈 9 月 1 日取消板友代表車, 只是遲了
兩天......因為想本板可讀性提高, 不想讓一個玩意用去了
站牌的一角, 況且有人不守規則, 輸入超過三架代表車, 甚
至代表飛機......我相信遲早會有爭吵, 倒不如取消好了.
Ken
Article 28:
Re: 木瓜架2201車尾又攪野
LM3 (angela05@netvigator.com) from imsp038.netvigator.com at Thu Sep 3 23:36, 1998 said:
> T.P.T. (dckk@netteens.net) said:
> 今朝返學又例牌見到2201行97, 又例牌睇睇車尾落o左Poster之
> 後有無上廣告, 點知真係上o左廣告, 唔係好記得個廣告名, 好
> 似有個H字既, 上油上得好離譜, 油到上太平窗, 唔多似係透視
> 喎... 唔通~? 死, 聽日落去睇清楚o的先.
>
> 尋日另見: 城記2500行10
>
> .....
> T.P.T.
這廣告是一個啤酒廣告---喜X啤酒
上層尾窗畫晒！！不是透視的。
Article 29:
Re: (幾急)參觀車廠申請
AL118(FF1819) (rainbowg@netvigator.com) from 254046.hkabc.net at Thu Sep 3 20:26, 1998 said:
> Flying Chuk (chuk@netvigator.com) said:
> 如想以團體名義參觀巴士廠(九巴總修中心),
> 手續是怎樣?
Write a letter to P.R. Department with your group chairman
signature, and principal signature if use your school name to apply!
收費又如何
Free of charge, but no feeder bus service!
及向那部們申請?
> (公關部?)
Yes!!
But KMB always reject the application with the common reason
(e.g. full booking for visiting, depot maintanence......)
>
You can apply to visit NWFB chai wan depot, Citybus Api Lei Chau Depot or KCR Bus Division Depot in Tuen Mun! That easy to apply and highly successful rate!
> 希望同板友協助,先謝^.^
AL118(FF1819)!!!!!!
>
> 或會於今學年舉辨總修中心參觀的
> 飛機竺
Article 30:
Re: 關則ｘ癡人說夢
Lucas Siu (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from ustsu18-nc1.ust.hk at Fri Sep 4 12:27, 1998 said:
> Y. F. Yiu (thrbros@netvigator.com) said:
> 新巴某助理總經理對傳媒話, 新巴客量比中巴的四十(一)萬人次
> 為高, 話說新巴比中巴少了多條油水線和立圾線, 能'自動過檔'
> 的客量約為27萬人次, 試問新巴接手兩天客量如何比中巴高?
> 那些新巴路線乘客大幅上升?
>
> 如果沒有的話, 以五百九十量車接載27萬人的效率似乎相當低,
> 比中巴和城巴都低得多!
I think the NWFB assiatant's saying is quite crazy.As from 1st Sept.,11 CMB routes were changed to Citybus routes,most have many passengers.Not only this,quite a lot of people switched from NWFB to Citybus because of NWFB chaotic at Breamer Hill District,together with the loss of about 30 routes from CMB makes the passenger amount of NWFB less than that of CMB.
Article 31:
Re: 找城巴 1275 & D4 照片
Busman (b9503033@ln.edu.hk) from jupiter.ln.edu.hk at Thu Sep 3 19:56, 1998 said:
> William (William.Lau@xtra.co.nz) said:
> Can anyone help me?
在Mike David的城巴書中有
XA48
Article 32:
運頭塘的74X和307.
72A (hangk@netvigator.com) from hhttnt01028.netvigator.com at Thu Sep 3 15:36, 1998 said:
點解運頭塘開的74X和307唔要其它號碼呢?(74P/307P)
沙田的87D有87X,81C有81P,上水的70X有70P,真係唔明?
Article 32: (Request 1)
例子很多：Rt.16早上由藍田開出的特別車，也不叫Rt.16P?
還有98A, 93A經將軍澳隧道以觀塘地鐵站為終站的特別車也是。
Article 33:
[WA]Transperth Fleet News
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) from proxy.curtin.edu.au at Fri Sep 4 12:25, 1998 said:
The following Transperth buses, which are operated by Southern Coast Transit, have got their registration numbers changed:
Mercedes Benz O305:
Fleet number: 439
Former registration number: UQB439
New registration number: 8QG987
Fleet number: 491
Former registration number: UQB491
New registration number: 8QG986
Renault PR100-2:
Fleet number: 571
Former registration number: UQB571
New registration number: 8QI503
In addition, a PATH Transit's Dennis Dart SLF (2001/TP2001) has been seen serving on route 84 on Tuesday (1.9.98) afternoon.
Article 34:
[問]115新記時間+那條過海線最快過中環
中遠太平揚 LA18 (tky808@hkschool.net) from bootes.hkschool.net at Fri Sep 4 10:47, 1998 said:
[問]115新記時間+那條過海線最快過中環
問
1.115新記時間(上環&九碼)
2.那條過海線由紅磡最快過中環/中環過紅磡?
3.LA18 在那條線?
Thank you for answering my questions!
中遠太平揚 (ICQ:5228542)
FP8329 HH9619
GN5032 FH1086
Article 35:
[廣告] File 37 更新
koala (koala@cuhk.edu.hk) from axp300a.csc.cuhk.edu.hk at Fri Sep 4 09:55, 1998 said:
File 37 加入了10幅九巴及城巴的廣告照片, 至於中巴呢... 還要等等...
File 37: http://koala.simplenet.com/file37
koala :P
Article 36:
英皇道塞巴士 及新記２號線用車
Bruce Li (bruceli@vcn.bc.ca) from 202.67.237.74 at Fri Sep 4 09:48, 1998 said:
自從九一之後，唔知點解在下午繁忙時間的時候，英皇道東行巴士
專線好鬼塞車，巴士車龍由北角新光開始排至天后地鐵站，何解？
唔知各版友有沒有同樣經歷呢？
ＰＳ 最近發現好多新記２號線行ＭＬ，唔知係唔係俾Ｄ師傅熟習
0下駕駛１２Ｍ車呢，以預備下兩星期此線全轉用Trident.
Article 37:
通告 0904: 資料庫搬遷及更新
Ken Fung (kenf@hkstar.com) from 202.68.58.226 at Fri Sep 4 03:19, 1998 said:
資料庫現已搬到 webcomm 之 server 內, 而且加上了 18 個
新的標題資料, 希望稍後能有時間繼續整理.
Ken
Article 38:
[WA]Phone Call Fells a Bus Shelter
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) from dial006.upnaway.com at Fri Sep 4 01:25, 1998 said:
The following article is extracted from the West Australian published on 3.9.98:
PHONE CALL FELLS A BUS SHELTER
Transperth recently received a complaint about the unsavoury behaviour of students at a bus shelter on Illawarra Crescent in Ballajura.
Always quick to look after the needs of its breathless public, a crack Transperth team leapt into action.
Using the time-honoured sledgehammer and nut routine, they promptly removed the offending shelter.
But no one bothered to tell the Shire of Swan, the owner of the $3000 shelter.
And to add insult to their injurious raiding technique, the clumsy Transperth team didn't dismantle the shelter but simply sawed it off at the legs.
After the removal of the shelter, the shire received a letter from Transperth's Dave Tierney explaining that 'circumstances beyond our control' had forced them to act and apologising for the 'unorthodox manner' in which the incident had been handled.
A council fizgig (good noun, that) told us shelters had been relocated in the past but it was always done by the council after community consultation.
The fiz whispered that Transperth would not say why they had removed the shelter but had hinted they might provide some compensation.
We rang Mr. Tierney but neither he nor anyone else at Transperth was saying anything except 'no comment'.
Now who has the clout to get public facilities removed with a single phone call?
Article 39:
[網頁通告]超級紙巴士工廠更新
2138 K.Y.Chung (w3d080r@school.net.hk) from blue.alumni.cuhk.edu.hk at Thu Sep 3 22:36, 1998 said:
超級紙巴士工廠現加入8-31-1998中巴留影三十多幅,並
在閘口C2加入由volvo b12提供之2101(虛構車身顏色)及
2212,而電郵區亦新增電郵地址至四個.本網頁亦已加設
新連結如下:
http://come.to/spbc/
或可由此正式連結進入.
2138 K.Y.Chung
恭候各網友大駕光臨
Article 40:
新巴2000系列sequence
PTC (bc_cly@stu.ust.hk) from ustsu54-nc1.ust.hk at Thu Sep 3 22:47, 1998 said:
See http://susis.ust.hk/~bus/dart.htm
我個人覺得新記牌布排法唔係咁好, 因為有好多線都唔可以攪一格,
往往要攪好多格,好似M21咁都要攪4格. 希望將來O的牌布可以SET得
好D, 唔使司傅O下O下攪到身水身汗.最好好似城記咁O係牌布中間
寫白牌或者新記LOGO,咁萬一攪唔到牌或者距離太遠都唔使攪到牌布頭/
牌布尾攪到手軟.
牌布迷PTC
Article 41:
'新'歌推介---中巴情
ERIC CHING (bching@hk.super.net) from max9-36.hk.super.net at Thu Sep 3 21:24, 1998 said:
中巴情(借古巨基友門and情)
搭新巴總掛念從前 中巴車挪可愛片段
突然又已玩圓 旗仔再不見
雞鴨寶 就算車殘又肉酸
但退了役便算 時間改變細界變
城巴車很多的變遷 中巴情從未改變
新富豪找不到缺點 珍寶日日相見
隨年和月車仟不浩損 中巴情從未改變
心內挪旗仔 惟有在`必達再見
(I love cmb 中華巴士
cmb transport u and me...............)
多謝看本人作品,歡迎給意見
ERIC CHING
( icq 14046165)
Article 42:
意外收穫
AV373(HN7542) (syhung@netvigator.com) from hhtck007083.netvigator.com at Thu Sep 3 21:23, 1998 said:
今日搭M21(2015)去
北角,跟住坐8X(2200)去
灣仔'洪兄'看巴士模型
,見倒'新記啟行日'0既紀
念郵票,於是拿拿淋買番
幾套,D郵票好正。
另外,我見倒好多金躉行
300,得閒一定要搭0下。
這星期內會搭金躉的
AV373(HN7542)
Article 43:
Request: CMB's Accounting Records Online
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) from dial001.upnaway.com at Thu Sep 3 18:40, 1998 said:
Does anybody know where I can get such information on the net?
Please contact with me immediately if you can manage to help me. Thank you!
Article 44:
新巴招數分析
Colin Chang (kalim@netvigator.com) from hhttnt02125.netvigator.com at Fri Sep 4 13:15, 1998 said:
新巴其實用o左好多招數去建立自己o既形象，我見到o既有4大點：
1) 減低市民期望
新巴明白「希望越大、失望越大」o既道理，所以佢一直都無高調咁肯定
交接當日一定無問題，並且多次多調「我地會用番中巴o既舊巴士」，等
市民對新巴運作初期唔好抱有太大希望。另外，運輸處同傳媒則大肆宣
傳「九一混亂論」，自然令人有點恐慌。新巴當日可以正常地進行運作，
市民舒一口氣，更覺新巴對「處理危機」有一手(其實只不過係照以往中
巴o既派車運作，再加o的原12線o既車落去)，印象自然好。
2) 不斷給予希望
新巴一直強調「兩年內訂購500輛新巴士」，令仍然乘坐中巴舊車o既乘客
有新希望，知道「遲o的會轉」，所以唔會有太多怨言。雖然，有二百幾架
巴士仲未落單，而且好多線都唔知幾時先會換車。
3) 龐大宣傳
無一間巴士公司會好似新巴咁用龐大banner宣傳攻勢去「麻痺」乘客，呢個
方法又平效果又高，日日同你催眠，乘客仲唔投降？仲有31/8同1/9兩日報紙
o既全版廣告，將一o的其他人唔多覺眼o既改變(車乾淨o左......老實講，真
係要「細心留意一下」先至可以發覺得到)話俾人知。
4) 加強展示效果
新巴對於舊路線「一係唔轉，一轉就全冷」o既招數其實好勁，佢可以令乘
客響短時間內對一條路線完全改觀，加強前後o既比較，(由DS變10xx，
你諗o下個轉變幾犀利？)如果慢慢加，效果就細好多。
