Today's Articles: 71.
Articles' Numbers: (19980508_01-71)
Article 1:
Re: 2117 行 1 ?
ALX500 Kamy (96936031d@polyu.edu.hk) at Thu May 7 22:23, 1998 said:
> Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) said:
> 今日見 2117 行 1, 下午六點埋林士街總站, 車上冇人, 是否載客的?
我 8:00pm 經過灣仔天樂里, 都見度架 2118 行 1號向跑馬地方向,
一分鐘後又見度架 2116, 都係行 1號, 但係向中環方向, 兩車上
都有客. 車內o既行李架係飛機倉o個隻
有冇人知今日總共有幾多架新車出街?
ALX500 Kamy
Article 1: (Request 1)
真係載人呀!
小弟今日和女友約5:00pm在灣仔見到2117行1號,
0甘0米甫佢.點不知約15分鐘後2118離埋,0甘我
0米用每人$3.4之價錢去享受機場巴士.
當架車去到林士街總站時,2122正起前面,0甘我0米
又跳飛機跳過去.上車前,成班司機讓說該3部新車,
他們有d話好正,之後佢0地成班仲玩個升降板.原來
塊板店到野自動會停.
跟住本人在灣仔落車送女友歸家,之後又在灣仔撞到
2117,0甘0米上埋去.
總括來說,發現新Trident和2100的不同之處在
1:車頭上層多了個蔽露電視(冇開)
2:車頭上層之單水撥
3:上層樓梯位部蔽露電視比2100更大,但行Dun路時會
有雪花.
4:3架車內籠好臭
今日坐足3部新Trident的
Schneider
Article 1: (Request 2)
我今日大約下午六點九見到 2116 行 1, 是載客的, 樓下仲
有人企. 有架 2200 行 8x 跟在後面.
地點: 摩理臣山道往跑馬地方向.
小文 (ADS136)
Article 1: (Request 3)
> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:
>
> 有否看見車牌﹖
我係坐響架 917 下層睇到o既, 架 2117 剛由美心快餐那條街閃出來,
如果唔係我歸心似箭兼唔忍心o徙o左 $8.90 兼天黑影相唔靚, 我真係
想飛奔落車 ... 答番你個問題 ... 睇唔到車牌, 或者同樣睇到 2117
行 1 的板主可以答一答呢條問題嗎?
--
車匙!
Article 1: (Request 4)
2117 睇唔到...... :(
2116 - HS7792
2118 - HS6714
有幸可以影到 Trident 行 1 既 Ken ^_^
Article 1: (Request 5)
> Claymon (claymon@cyberec.com) said:
>
> 咁樣211x係幾點開始行? 我上午10點起企嚮太古廣場近一個鐘
> 都見唔到, 嗚~~~
>
> 註定今日同「城記機場快線」無緣的智叔
> MC7 - BV2050
話時話點解城記要d批Trident行1號呢?
Article 1: (Request 6)
> Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) said:
>
> 城巴派車有道理可言o既咩 :p ?
有﹗‘跳飛機’制度嘛﹗ ﹕)
Article 1: (Request 7)
> Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) said:
>
> 查實佢派o的新車俾o的唔熟手o既司機四圍舞, 都幾高風險下 ...
何解你會認為他們的技術不足以應付Trident呢?
Article 1: (Request 8)
> Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) said:
>
> 渣 TRIDENT 技術或許充足, 但渣 TRIDENT 行 1 號的經驗就
> 似乎不足, 而且明天又可能走左去行 3B, 5C, 6X, 7 ...
> 唔跟線行, 風險似乎比較高囉 ...
那也沒法啦﹗誰叫城巴一直以來，車源也是那樣緊張。
Article 1: (Request 9)
Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) said:
>
> 不過似乎拿新車四圍試唔同線, 炫耀味道多一點囉.
用炫耀呢個字都幾好o既, 不過佢將 D 車周圍走, 都係想全港乘客都知
有架咁o既車去機場o者....
㊣如九記周圍放 3AD, 攪到全個九龍新界都知道有款咁嘈o既車. -_-
Article 1: (Request 10)
係咪正!有機會聽日搭Trident出中環....
6X其實是有機會的.
Article 1: (Request 11)
> Schneider (schneide@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 我聽班渣Trident師博講佢0地之前有上頭教過佢地渣Trident.
> 情況正如98師博學渣1501一樣.
聽說城巴有一份名單，只有榜上有名的司機才可以駕駛Trident。
(據悉B12也是如此。)
Article 1: (Request 12)
> ALX500 Kamy (96936031d@polyu.edu.hk) said:
> 你估遲D會唔會行其他線?
機會很大。(還記得較早前那批Trident四處走的情形嗎﹖)
Article 1: (Request 13)
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:
>
> 機會很大。(還記得較早前那批Trident四處走的情形嗎﹖)
機會係 100%. 因為佢地一定會行 A11,A12,A21,A22,E11,E21,E22,N21,
N11,N21,N22 丫嘛....
Article 1: (Request 14)
> Schneider (schneide@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 話時話點解城記要d批Trident行1號呢?
可能是試車吧﹗因為在數年前，當城巴的10.4米Volvo Olympian剛投入服務的時候，
情況也是一樣。
Article 1: (Request 15)
> Schneider (schneide@netvigator.com) said:
> 呢3架Trident約今日3:30仲起鴨廠度,0甘早當然見唔到啦!
> 反而我就見唔到2500拉.我在金鐘4:00-5:00pm見唔到佢!
> 諗住甫2500,點知坐到2117,2118,2122.
> 仲有呀,坐2117個陣時見到2116有行1號.
Today, appox 10:30, I also saw 2113 for 917, going to
Sham Shui Po.
Article 1: (Request 16)
> eriC (dart@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 如果你四點幾知道鴨廠發生乜事,就唔駛去捕2500啦,佢入廠o丫嗎!
> 詳見今日鴨廠
喂﹗什麼也看不見呀﹗
Article 1: (Request 17)
> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:
>
> 喂﹗什麼也看不見呀﹗
搞返好啦,睇到o架啦
再去過!
Article 2:
Re: Cityflyer and Long Win
Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) at Thu May 7 21:35, 1998 said:
> 100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) said:
> According to an article in South China Morning Post (http://www.scmp.com) May 7, 1998. Citybus has officially dubbed its 50 new (Dennis Tridents) buses as 'Cityflyer' to serve the new airport.
> Also, according to the article, 'The Dennis double-deckers feature 78 reclinable seats, luggage racks, overhead compartments, bilingual visual and audio announcements, access ramps and Octopus smart card receptors.'
> Hence, I wonder if Long Win offer will offer similar equipment beside annoucement system. (luggage racks and access ramps aren't available on its Olympians, in which it 'might' use in case of emergency)
> If so, how can Long Win be competitive then? Does it have any plan to install Octopus at all?
Long Win's Tridents in luxury version haven't
shipped to Hong Kong yet. They will run A-routes
while the current Tridents and Olympians will
continue run E-routes.
--
Gakei!
Article 2: (Request 1)
> 100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) said:
> I thought those Long Win Tridents are already in airport specifications with luggage racks and seat belts already, versus the 'commuter' version similar to ATR1.
>
> I mean, why do you need luggage racks for 'E' routes? Wouldn't that be a waste of resources as you have always emphasized?
Well, Gakei has forgot to mention about the 'S' routes, which would be better if luggage racks are fitted on the buses being used.
Article 2: (Request 2)
> 100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) said:
>
> Good point, although I do wonder if you really need seatbelts for such short 'S' routes? Wouldn't that be a waste of resources again? (couldn't these seatbelts be installed on buses which travel on longer journey on highways, where they're more useful)
> Also, if this is true, where does Long Win obtain more buses without luggage racks to serve all of its 'E' routes? (as you implied all of its existing Tridents will go to the 'S' routes) More Tridents (or even Olympians if you want) on their way with 'communter' specification?
Did I say all of the current Tridents will serve the 'S' routes instead of 'E' routes?
According to the route plan, E33, E34 and E41 will terminate at the new airport. That's why the luggage racks are needed.
Article 2: (Request 3)
> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:
>
> Did I say all of the current Tridents will serve the 'S' routes instead of 'E' routes?
> According to the route plan, E33, E34 and E41 will terminate at the new airport. That's why the luggage racks are needed.
Now I'm confused! You've 'E' routes terminating at the airport! If so, why not just name them with 'A' prefix?
Or are these 'E' routes supposed to be 'special', being 'semi-commuter' or whatever else, so luggage racks are needed but no reclinable seats, overhead compartments, bilingual visual announcements, and Octopus smart card receptors are offered.
100 Wong
Article 2: (Request 4)
> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:
>
>
> Well, you may say they are semi-commuter routes if you like, as their targeted passengers are supposed to be local commuters instead of tourists.
Does it make sense not to install Octopus for 'local' commuters then?
100 Wong
Article 2: (Request 5)
> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:
>
> Who told you that Octopus will not be installed on such buses?
I don't know about the future, obviously. Though at least none of Long Win's bus has Octopus now! If they're targeted towards 'local' commuters, shouldn't Long Win begin installation of Octopus on THESE buses NOW?
100 Wong
Article 2: (Request 6)
> 100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) said:
>
> I don't know about the future, obviously. Though at least none of Long Win's bus has Octopus now! If they're targeted towards 'local' commuters, shouldn't Long Win begin installation of Octopus on THESE buses NOW?
The problem is, there are not enough Octopus readers (and even the stock of Octopus cards!) in Hong Kong at this stage.
Article 2: (Request 7)
I guess Octopus should be blamed here then. I remember I first saw Octopus readers on buses in December 96 on many buses, particularly buses being used on cross harbour tunnel routes.
After more than a year, the proportion of Octopus equipped buses is still very small.
Octopus also caused problems in light of coin shortages in Hong Kong. I've a friend who depends on 917, and when CTB allocates its 'brand new' 97x-98x buses, none of them is equipped with Octopus. Hence he had to dig into his pocket for changes in order to enjoy these 'brand new' buses. (with the smell)
100 Wong
Article 2: (Request 8)
> 現代王莽-ICQ:5228542 (tky808@hkschool.net) said:
> Long-Win provide the service with very LOW-price!
>
> eg. E33 & E34 only $13 ONLY!!!
>
Have you taken traveling distance and tunnel fee as consideration?
100 Wong
Article 3:
Re: 你認為邊款巴士凳最好坐?
林文放 (manhing@hkstar.com) at Fri May 8 02:39, 1998 said:
> 輝仔 (c5124176@comp.polyu.edu.hk) said:
> 以下款式, 以供參考, 歡迎另有題名:
>
> 1. 中記銀豪/新DA Trendex
> 2. 九記2+2有頭枕
> 3. 城記機場版21xx
> 4. 城記市區版22xx
> 5. 中記VA/LA超厚坐墊
> 6. 城記吸濕大笨象有/冇頭枕
> 7. 城記過境B12
> 8. ...
懷舊提供
8. 中記倫敦寶
9. 中記都城豪華版(MC 系列)
小西灣城巴站站長
林文放
Article 3: (Request 1)
我份人比較貪心兼偏心, 都係覺得中記(以上兩隻)較好坐
ALX500 Kamy
Article 3: (Request 2)
> VA51(塞米一條) (parnell@hkstar.com) said:
> 中記銀豪+新condor(VA51-64,DA83-92)同中記超厚坐墊(一定要係VA/LA的那種雪滑的那種!)我都最鍾意!
我就鍾意2100批凳(2117,2218,2122批凳好似比2100硬左d),
個人意見.
當然LM/LA批凳我鍾意.
三心兩意的
Schneider
Article 3: (Request 3)
5. 中記VA/LA超厚坐墊
我最鍾意呢隻!!
不過只限:LA1-25,LM1-10,VA1-30
因為我坐落去o既感覺話我知VA31-50 o既坐墊係比較硬(需然兩者表面好似)
今日搭o左兩次LA23(8)同一次LM3(94X)o既
eriC
Article 3: (Request 4)
3. 城記機場版21xx
實在太舒服啦
CTB12
Article 3: (Request 5)
呢款最正，新 VA o的都唔夠佢好坐
啦莎溫呢o的位就太硬，唔多好坐。
Article 3: (Request 6)
輝仔 (c5124176@comp.polyu.edu.hk) said:
> 5. 中記VA/LA超厚坐墊
Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) said:
> 梗係呢個啦, 仲要坐上層車尾窗口位, 有冷氣槽當頭枕嘛.
乜最後果行 D 位唔係寧舍高o既咩? 你腳長先冇咁辛苦咋喎...
不過我都係揀 VA/LM/LA 做膽, 21XX 做腳.
Article 3: (Request 7)
雙腳吊起, 用膝頭頂住前面個凳背, 個頭o岩o岩好捱響個冷氣糟度,
不過坐得耐會蘿柚痛, 兼 dub 起車o黎可能成個人摺埋o左.
--
車匙!
Article 4:
Re: 問 962 龍門居 <> 銅鑼灣
GF1912 (yanho@netvigator.com) at Thu May 7 22:44, 1998 said:
> Cummins LT10 (cumminsl@netvigator.com) said:
> 今日收到區議員的單張， 962 會在 1/6/98 試辦。
> 在路線表中見來回均在小欖交匯處轉行青山公路，再經屯門鄉事會路到海珠路等回屯碼`龍門居。
> 好似好怪， 9xx 線經青山公路， 不知到開辦時會否一樣？
或者諗住做埋三聖一帶o既客，如果行屯公直返龍門居，唔比佢開都似。
> 此外，試辦時只說是早五班晚五班， 不知是單向還是對開？
咁開法，單向都似。
Article 4: (Request 1)
o甘又係， 至少唔會比運 x 署話同油麻地直接爭呀。
Cummins LT10
Article 4: (Request 2)
> 沙電學徒 (ranger@hknet.com) said:
> 如上題
城巴在五月六日已試車
您知邊個做啦!
路線是來回經蝴蝶,翠寧,三聖黃金海岸往天后
Article 4: (Request 3)
> F-stephen (c462a198@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 請問經不經湖翠路(兆禧苑及海翠花園),若經的話,難怪油麻地小輪
> 打算下年取消雙體船服務吧!
>
> 以前有板友作過一些取代油麻地小輪的巴士線,相信一步步快實現了
> ....
>
> F-stephen
962開辦後,屯門區只有東北區沒有過境線.
金魚字
Article 4: (Request 4)
> 金魚 (n960@hkabc.net) said:
>
> 962開辦後,屯門區只有東北區沒有過境線.
>
> 金魚字
960都經景峰啦, 景峰算唔算係東北?
仲有, 係過海線而唔係過境線下話?
=P
專捉人錯字既趙雲 xP
Article 4: (Request 5)
> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:
>
> 用什麼車來試﹖
會否組兆麟苑?
Article 5:
二十世紀香港巴士歷史風雲人物選舉
Spike Wu.(2001)(G16) (abspike@school.net.hk) at Thu May 7 23:34, 1998 said:
二十世紀香港巴士歷史風雲人物選舉:
侯選名單:
1)顏成'君',顏'杰'玲父女----顏成'君',一個睇住自己既巴士王國由盛至衰既巴士
大亨.顏'杰'玲,虎父無犬女,同樣都係咁勁!
2)李'月'新----提出保留白水箱,中巴長龍被cut短,城記跳飛機制度....
都係有佢份.
3)長毛----巴士大盜,小至車身水牌,大至巴士行車證,乜都偷餐飽!
4)陳祖'集'----做做o下高官走左去攪巴士,都係咁掂!
5)施??----新巴果個唔知乜野勁人,資料唔夠,請補充.
6)湯'蕉'然----中巴工會領導者,大擺工......
7)Mike Davis----香港巴士書始祖,資料詳盡,成為被炒對象.
8)陳自'圓'----唔駛講都知佢係邊個啦!中文巴士書賣到成行
成市...年鑑,識別,手冊..
9)鄭'魚'彤----新巴!新巴!我支持你.......??!!
10)雷'水'德----亞洲最大私營巴士公司始創人,即係九記!
如果仲有提名人,歡迎提出意見!
Spike Wu.(2001)(G16)
Article 5: (Request 1)
１１） 「流明全」：即係「不達樓」。佢致力保留「鐘記」Ｄ舊車
，扺讚！
列治文‧卑詩省‧加拿大 Cambie／No.4 Rd.站長
Article 5: (Request 2)
DA54 (da54@netteens.net) said:
>
> 這個賤人毫無資格做歷史風雲人物, 此人簡直嚴重貶低巴士迷聲譽！
咪係! 歷史人物? 遺臭萬年就o岩....最好 D 知情人士第日寫書寫臭佢,
指名道姓寫出黎, 登埋相添, 等人認得佢.
Article 5: (Request 3)
> eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:
>
> 咪係! 歷史人物? 遺臭萬年就o岩....最好 D 知情人士第日寫書寫臭佢,
> 指名道姓寫出黎, 登埋相添, 等人認得佢.
But 歷史人物 not need to be good, but can be also bad, very bad, like 希特拉 is also a 歷史人物 la!
Article 5: (Request 4)
> Spike Wu.(2001)(G16) (abspike@school.net.hk) said:
> 二十世紀香港巴士歷史風雲人物選舉:
不如等2000/2001年先選啦......(邊個知道呢兩年會唔會
另有風雲人物出現...也許是你呢!)
Article 5: (Request 5)
如果要選，我會選 顏伯伯 同前輩 鄧伯伯
點會有兩間1933專利公司呢！
顏伯伯，一人統治了巴士生意 78 年．點會不是二十世紀香港巴士歷史風雲人物呢！
Article 5: (Request 6)
只要您肯努力
您都可成為香港的巴士歷史風雲人物
不過，總要靠天時，地利，人和
後生仔．努力吧
唔好睇低自己，亦不要自傲
可望你成功
筆 者
本 行 舊 員 工
Article 5: (Request 7)
他的全名是施偉廉(Mark Savelli)
Article 6:
循環線
BB (jacob@hknet.com) at Thu May 7 16:41, 1998 said:
今天我搭了九巴85M全程﹝即是俾單程車費搭足來回！﹞
請問有幾多絛巴士線是循環線的？
Article 6: (Request 1)
風間火月 (adagatha@netvigator.com) said:
> 想問當年九記的1K同2K點行，用過乜車？
> （我只係見過亞比安豪華巴士，雞同圓頂寶）
1K 九龍車站開:
暢運道, 漆咸道南, 梳士巴利道, 尖碼, 梳士巴利道, 彌敦道, 眾坊街,
上海街, 旺角道, 洗衣街, (花墟道, 園藝街, 基堤道) 太子道西, 通菜街,
界限街, 九龍城迴旋處, 馬頭涌道, 馬頭圍道, 浙江街, 馬頭圍道, 蕪湖街,
大沽街, 寶其利街, 明安街, 必嘉街, 機利士南路, 暢運道.
2K 九龍車站開:
暢運道, 機利士南路, 蕪湖街, 馬頭圍道, 土瓜灣道, 馬頭角道, 馬頭涌道,
太子道西, 彌敦道, 梳士巴利道, 尖碼, 梳士巴利道, 漆咸道南, 暢運道.
Article 6: (Request 2)
除了在九龍車站做總站外，也曾經試過在旺角火車站做總站。
行車路線如下：
１Ｋ──旺角火車站 （北行循環線）
聯運街，洗衣街，（花墟道，園藝街，太子道西，基堤道）／（太子道西，
通菜街），界限街，太子道西，世運迴旋處，馬頭涌道，（馬頭圍道，浙江
街）／（木廠街，土瓜灣道），馬頭圍道，蕪湖街，大沽街，寶其利街，明
安街，必嘉街，機利士南路，暢運道，漆咸道南，梳士巴利道，天星碼頭巴
士總站，梳士巴利道，彌敦道，眾坊街，上海街，旺角道，洗衣街，亞皆老
街，聯運街。
２Ｋ──旺角火車站 （南行循環線）
聯運街，洗衣街，太子道西，彌敦道，梳士巴利道，天星碼頭巴士總站，梳
士巴利道，漆咸道南，暢運道，安運道，暢運道，機利士南路，蕪湖街，馬
頭圍道，（新柳街，漆咸道北，馬頭圍道）／（土瓜灣道，馬頭角道），馬
頭涌道，太子道西，彌敦道，旺角道，洗衣街，亞皆老街，聯運街。
臨終前用車：
１Ｋ──勝利二型
２Ｋ──平頂珍寶，勝利二型
5D 德褔花園 往 紅磡 (循環線)
每日 6:00-24:00 服務
車費:$3.5 行車里數:18.1 km 行車時間:60 min
Article 6: (Request 3)
> eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:
>
> 九巴: 2C,3S,7M,8A,10,13M,16M,18,23,23M,24,26M,27,29M,31,34M,
> 37M,38S,39A,42M,43A,43M,71B,71K,81K,82P,82X,83K,85M,87K,87S,
> 93M,211,216M,219P,219X,224M,224X,273,273A,282,283,285,286M,287K,
> 296A.
> 中巴: 2M,21,23A,23B,25,25M,26,27,78,79,84,91A,93,94A,94X,95,
> 595.
> 城巴: 5B,5C,11,12,12A,12M,37A,37B,511.
> 隧巴: 105A.
eddie 兄，閣下還欠了某些路線：
九巴: 2C,3S,５Ｄ,7M,8A,10,13M,１４Ｓ,16M,18,23,23M,24,26M,27,29M,31,
３２Ｂ，３２Ｍ,34M,37M,38S,39A,42M,43M,７０Ｋ,71B,71K,82P,82X,83K,
85M,87K,87S,93M,211,216M,219P,219X,224M,224X,２３５，２３５Ｍ,273,273A,282,
283,285,286M,287K,296A.
中巴: 2M,21,23A,23B,25,25M,26,27,78,79,８３,84,91A,93,94A,94X,95,
９５Ｂ，３３８,595.
城巴: 5B,5C,11,12,12A,12M,37A,37B,511,５２９.
5D 德褔花園 往 紅磡 (循環線)
每日 6:00-24:00 服務
車費:$3.5 行車里數:18.1 km 行車時間:60 min
Article 6: (Request 4)
呀~ eddie 兄你漏左 235 同 235M 喎.
Victor
Article 6: (Request 5)
> AV89 (ngpt@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 1. 43A好似改左非循環lu.
> 2. 21,105A真是循環線嗎? 105A不是一到港碼就轉私牌返廠/隧道口;
> 21不是在太古城有總站嗎?
21,105A是循環線,105A可以在隧道口九龍方向巴士站搭105A返香港.
21是以中環做總站.
43A是兩邊總站.
邊條線是否循環,查巴士公司o拉,可以避免浪費本板資源.
Article 6: (Request 6)
> Aqua (tsesh@hkstar.com) said:
>
> 81K不是循環線.
> ---
282就係，81K係新田圍<-->穗和苑。
AS3/AV112 風間火月
Article 7:
路線合併
YuTin (hraskww@hkusua.hku.hk) at Thu May 7 15:55, 1998 said:
YuTin said:
我想在部份板友的心目中都有些希望巴士公司合併的路線,現在大家不妨說出來,發表各位的高見, 一起討論討論!
多謝.
Article 7: (Request 1)
>1.中記:18和21號合併:改為由堅尼地城至太古城,假日行走及以21的服務時間行走,我覺得合併的好處是:一,最少中巴/新一巴可以少條蝕錢線; 二,有新線由西區到西灣河, 三,九月城巴行埋10號,點都要搵條線落堅城搶o下生意.
>2.龍運:E31和E32合併:即取消E31,而E32兜荃灣,好似49X咁.
>3.中記/城記:11A和25M合併:會展新翼至寶馬山,經勵德村.因為25M過了銅鑼灣都無乜人上,不如行勵德仲好啦.
>
>YuTin
Article 7: (Request 2)
> AV89 (ngpt@netvigator.com) said:
> 嘩! 兜得咁犀利, 仲駛要的?!
>
> 還有:
> 中巴78+79
> 隧巴301+105A
> 九巴60+260C
>
> P.s:請 不 要 私 自 加 / 減 在 文 章 內 的 '>' 符 號
> Please DON'T add/delete any '>' sign(s) in the article.
我諗有：
城記 : 6A + 6X / 260
6X + 260
11 + 511
92 + 592
Article 7: (Request 3)
咁先取消 37A/37B 其中一條.
咁先取消 301.
加冷馬去 60 啦.
Article 7: (Request 4)
> A340 (a9506004@ln.edu.hk) said:
> Are you a newcomer? Have you read regulation of this board?
> Please DO NOT press the
Press the what?
The only thing I can be sure is that he has been here for a certain period already, as I've seen him committing the same fault before.
Article 7: (Request 5)
>Yu Tin said:
> 各位:對不起.
>由於小弟貼文的時候顯示了'資料尚未輸入',在板上又不見自己的文章,故此試貼幾次, 但估不到會出現此情況.sorry
>.
Article 7: (Request 6)
你可否先把內容相同的那幾篇文章刪除呢﹖
Article 8:
Re: 中巴黃廠遊~
VA51(塞米一條) (parnell@hkstar.com) at Thu May 7 20:18, 1998 said:
> T.P.T. (96029036d@hkpucc.polyu.edu.hk) said:
> 今朝上完網就落o左中巴黃竹坑車廠睇車, 點知發現...
>
> VA36(GV6348)已重新由上中巴標準冷氣色彩, 攪牌「888」
> 架車唔係廉署廣告咩? 點解咁快...?? 車頭亦有由上「空調
> 巴士 Air-cond bus」字樣, 呢架唔係柴廠車咩? 點解會o黎
> o左黃廠? 絕對無睇錯, 真係VA36, 我還抄底車牌添~
>
> LA14 已經整好晒, 泊o左響黃廠對外既空地, 車牌是新的~
> 不過還是「FG 3725」, 而'受傷'的部份已補過... 不過還
> 未上油~ 車尾部份好污糟, 我諗就快會上返去上油!
>
> .....
> T.P.T.
你係點入到間黃廠架?
Article 8: (Request 1)
小小題外話, 前日我出左去牛河, 坐著架 LM3 行 42, 由銅鑼灣坐到去華富,
由於我一路上都享受緊一本新出日本漫畫, 架車去到華富我都唔理, 架車過左
培英中學個迴旋處理應轉右, 點知佢唔係, 直行去華富北, 又再直行, 我心諗,
乜改左路兜一圈先返總站咩? 點知架車出去華富閣戲院, 佢轉左!! 跟住行到過左
條隧道仔, 我先知驚, 拿拿林執野落樓下問師傅: 「阿師傅, 呢架車唔係返總站
架咩? 」師傅答: 「頭先落晒啦...」我再問: 「咁架車去邊呀? 」師傅又答:
「哦...我收工架喇, 架車返廠架! 一係你嚮呢度 (路邊黎架!) 落車行番頭先條
隧道返去啦!」於是我就咁落左車, 換著我訓左覺, 真係會「入廠」.
嘻...我都話架啦, 咁鬼快消失左, 好彩一早影左. 話薯話 VA35 又去左邊呢?
咁你就要接受現實喇....係喎, 又話新車/驗車之後會上銀色, 今次唔會?
又一架白雪雪冷馬! ^_^
Article 8: (Request 2)
> eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:
> 嘻...我都話架啦, 咁鬼快消失左, 好彩一早影左. 話薯話 VA35 又去左邊呢?
可惜 DA67 你又估唔中呢~ 呵呵~~ ^_^
仲有響三樓都有架好新好白既 VA , 唔知係咪 VA35 呢? 攪「948」,
剩係見到車尾咋~
> 咁你就要接受現實喇....係喎, 又話新車/驗車之後會上銀色, 今次唔會?
講返少少野, 剩係車頭先有「空調」o的字o者~ 側面就睇唔到啦~
因為佢停o左響廠內, 我只是在門口欣賞, 所以都睇唔到係銀
色還是白色, 只係見到反晒光, 好靚, 有人整緊架車
> 又一架白雪雪冷馬! ^_^
仲係慢必... 係曼幫地剷廣告至o岩~
LA14 流程 Link: : P
未撞時(無呀~ 你有無呢?)
↓ ↓ ↓
LA14 撞車時的樣子
↓ ↓ ↓
在廠修理時的樣子
↓ ↓ ↓
現況(未曬, 遲下先啦! ^o^)
.....
T.P.T.
Article 8: (Request 3)
> eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:
>
> 小小題外話, 前日我出左去牛河, 坐著架 LM3 行 42, 由銅鑼灣坐到去華富,
> 由於我一路上都享受緊一本新出日本漫畫, 架車去到華富我都唔理, 架車過左
> 培英中學個迴旋處理應轉右, 點知佢唔係, 直行去華富北, 又再直行, 我心諗,
> 乜改左路兜一圈先返總站咩? 點知架車出去華富閣戲院, 佢轉左!! 跟住行到過左
> 條隧道仔, 我先知驚, 拿拿林執野落樓下問師傅: 「阿師傅, 呢架車唔係返總站
> 架咩? 」師傅答: 「頭先落晒啦...」我再問: 「咁架車去邊呀? 」師傅又答:
> 「哦...我收工架喇, 架車返廠架! 一係你嚮呢度 (路邊黎架!) 落車行番頭先條
> 隧道返去啦!」於是我就咁落左車, 換著我訓左覺, 真係會「入廠」.
呢條線嘛 , 有陣時字軌師傅休息冇人替佢 , 就會俾o的唔做一
工半o既師傅替 (即係一工收) , 都好少會聽到42一工收唔經迴
旋處 , 咁o既行法 , o係黃廠 '' 士啤 '' 師傅裏面 , 剩係有一,兩個
師傅先至會咁行o架 .
P.S. : R.42 '' 一工收 '' 用車不定 , 冷馬都用過 .
LA11 Shing FF7869
Article 8: (Request 4)
> LA11 Shing (b493332@hkstar.com) said:
>
>
> 柴廠有o的車 , o係日修或者大修o既時候 , 都會拉車過黃
> 廠整 , 好似以前o既VA32 , 都曾經拉過去黃廠整 .
>
> LA11 Shing FF7869
今朝番工, 坐DA20, 今朝坐導航位同個師傅傾計, 問o左佢兩樣o野:
尋日竟可以扲部DA87出來打仗(佢係扲黃廠日修車打仗), 呢部車唔
係o係柴廠整咩? 佢話因為黃廠冇哂車整, 所以就係柴廠踢部車過
黃整. 第二樣o野: 個師傅尋日話呢部車係年驗, 舊年八月先落地,
咁快? 佢話因為一來冇車整, 二來九月呢部車九月會俾新巴, 所以
提早年驗整好先俾人(中記都幾好喎!).
換句話說, DA20即係今日日修.
輝仔
Article 8: (Request 5)
> Colin Chang (kalim@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 哈哈，我今日坐111番工時響隧道口見到DA20，都估到係日修車打仗，
> 特別留意一下導航位，果然見有個人同師傅傾緊偈。
咁好彩俾你見到. 我朝朝都搭呢班車, 不過好少會坐導航位, (朝朝
坐嘛! 難度朝朝傾計?) 通常會坐上層右邊樓梯後第一個窗口位, 一
來右邊窗口睇o野多D, 二來個位夠開揚, 唔駛對住人o地個後尾枕.
難得一日同師傅傾開唔上樓上, 就俾你見到 :).
--
輝仔
>
>
> 中巴好奇怪o架，有o的黃廠車係柴廠日修，有o的柴廠車又係黃廠日修
> o架喎。以前成日見o的XF響黃廠整，整好就打仗42，有時打仗590。
>
> 至於架巴士，驗好可能可以賣貴o的呢！
>
>
> 呢輪好多冷氣車做COR同COF，攪到成日見隧道車司機著恤衫開熱狗。
Article 9:
Re: Wrong Fleet No.
S3BL390 (s967817@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) at Thu May 7 18:27, 1998 said:
> AV89 (ngpt@netvigator.com) said:
> 如題 As in the topic
>
- ATR1-->ATR
> - S3M203(74A)-->3M203
> - (Please go on)(請接力)
>
>
3)AV222-->AV22
S3BL390 66M
Article 9: (Request 1)
> S3BL (tin@school.net.hk) said:
> 4) AV342 (HM 3066) --> AV3
> 5) AV349 (HM 4139) --> AV394
> 6) S3BL8 (DK 8065) --> S3BL39
> 7) 3AV218(HD 9363) --> 3AV12
8) S3BL23-->S3BL123
9) (many years ago) N146--> N164
A340
Article 9: (Request 2)
How about these cases:
AS11 -> AV11
AL27 -> AV27
Article 9: (Request 3)
> Cummins LT10 (cumminsl@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 59M
>
> DY 2773; S3BL267 -> S3BL276
>
> Cummins LT10
S3BL308 was used to be written as S3BL803, I have a pic of its rear.
Article 9: (Request 4)
> wp12a (gw7112li@netvigator.com) said:
> N35 (CB7165) -> N3 !
And, G20? (CH388) -> G20 !
> Some bus fans told everybody 'N3 was revived', when I saw this 'N3',
> I can't help just laugh! Have they checked the registration number?
> The real N3 bears the reg no BS9154.
Haha, my friend told me that G20 hasn't scrqapped, I didn't believe him, but when I saw that bus, I know what he's talking! It's another great work of KMB!
Article 10:
Re: DA83 驗完?
Ricky Chan (95098987d@polyu.edu.hk) at Thu May 7 22:45, 1998 said:
> Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) said:
> ‘今日特別所見’中寫著 DA83 驗完, 點解未夠一年就要驗o既?
我唔知規矩係點, 但所有巴士都係生日前三個月之內
年驗/大修的. 否則架車就唔會續牌了.
小弟淺見, 有錯請指正.
Ricky Chan
Article 10: (Request 1)
> Gohan (a3819@hkstar.com) said:
>
> DA83在上年7月出車，可能中巴唔想在大熱天時先去驗，
> 所以提早兩個月check o瓜！
> 另外我見倒DA83 換o左新VA 的地方牌布。
>
> P.S. 我見倒 DA84都在黃廠驗緊！
>
> o岩o岩搭完DA83 o既
> Gohan
>
DA87都驗緊, 115打仗師話因為批車九月會俾新巴, 所以提早年驗
整好俾人.
輝仔
Article 10: (Request 2)
舊 DA 方面...
DA44 剛做完 COR, 唔做 COF, 可能留俾下年（第六年）新巴搞。
Article 10: (Request 3)
乜中記有咁多後備新牌布嚮廠度? 乜唔係為左十四部新 VA 先整架咩?
以後 (九月前) 仲會唔會有車入廠換呢?
前幾日睇報紙話有架 HG 牌 DA 行 64 時嚮皇后大道東炒左喎? 係邊架?
Article 10: (Request 4)
咁會唔會蝕o左兩個月牌費呢?
定係車牌都係留番七月續牌呢?
同埋以前行車證係定明 3 月 31 日 (定係 12 月 31 日?) 續牌的,
咁第一年點算, 會唔會落地兩個月又要續牌驗車?
--
車是匕!
Article 11:
Re: MTR VS 公共BUS
風間火月 (adagatha@netvigator.com) at Fri May 8 11:00, 1998 said:
> Stanley Yung (n281@hkstar.com) said:
> 地鐵通車近二十年
> 對公共巴士行業衝擊現時已明顯
>
> 大家認為
> 巴士公司是否不思進取
中記（應該話中記高層）不思進取就係人都知啦！
九記，買左170架3AD唔知係唔係進取？
城記我覺得佢比市民的印象好進取（好似咋！）
其實政府的策略唔係太好，一味要市民依賴鐵路，不過市民都接受！
時間就係金錢嘛！貴過巴士一點就可以快巴士好多的時間到目的地。
最明顯係新界北如大埔，粉嶺，上水，好多市民仍依賴鐵路往返市區。
遲下西鐵通埋，連屯門，元朗同天水圍都會係。甘
太依賴鐵路會有一壞處：平時無事好好地，有乜大鑊野就聽成條鐵路癱晒！
各位都唔係未聽過/見過地鐵/九鐵有事時會點啦！
>
> 除CTB外，KMB可能較保守，CMB老細差(老細很...差)<盼望「老鄭」可解決>
> CTB卻有短處
城記代表作：將5B由蝕錢做到賺錢再反撬地鐵客！好野！
AS3/AV112 風間火月
Article 11: (Request 1)
我反對你呢個論點呀！
用大埔為例，巴士仍是重要交通工具，因為東鐵站差屋村太遠了
雖然有免費巴士，但好似我咁，去尖沙咀到會搭271，而全大埔人
去荃灣同觀塘都差不多（我估）全部搭晒巴士（除太和外），太
和因為冇直接車，我覺得佢地先搭東鐵，如果273P開全日，74A可以
行快快少少，東鐵可能會仲少大埔人搭！所以我覺得九巴響呢方面
太保守了，好似將軍澳咁，居然驚左地鐵而唔開太多新線，唉！
Article 11: (Request 2)
Claymon (claymon@cyberec.com) said:
>
> 好多時都唔係巴士唔進取,
> 而係政府根本唔會批一些與地鐵有直接競爭的路線.
> 係近呢幾年地鐵都差唔多飽和, 上述某些巴士線先至重見天日. (都係某些......)
當然啦, 地鐵/火車/輕鐵係由政府經營, 巴士係由私人公司經營.
政府又點會將 D 錢流入去人地個袋?
Article 11: (Request 3)
> Stanley Yung (n281@hkstar.com) said:
> 地鐵通車近二十年
> 對公共巴士行業衝擊現時已明顯
>
> 大家認為
> 巴士公司是否不思進取
Time has been changed. By the government policy in HK, the
backbone of public transport in Hong Kong is MTR. Public
buses has became the shuttle services. Let's think if there
is no MTR, can the road network in Hong Kong affort such
great transport demand?
> 除CTB外，KMB可能較保守，CMB老細差(老細很...差)
> CTB卻有短處
I don't think KMB is conservative. But the efficiency is not
as high as Citybus, due to the size and the structure of
the company. Anyway. every company has its strong and
weakness. In free economy, company must find its way to
stay in the market. If no then.... CMB is a good example.
BusBoy
Article 11: (Request 4)
Over the years, unfortunately, feeders has been the role of buses, except in places no railway is accessible. One simple point about roads, BAN THE CARS (But of course public transport must be dramatically improved and made more convenient for the public simultaneously.
Article 12:
Re: 冇旗仔撈稿
鎮遠 (leesh@hkabc.net) at Fri May 8 01:42, 1998 said:
> Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) said:
> LF277 的右車身冇o左 CHINA MOTOR BUS 字樣同埋 FLEET NO.
> 九巴車身冇貼撈稿都見唔少, 中巴就第一次見, 其實情況常見嗎?
以前LA6上左廣告又係冇左支旗仔.
Article 12: (Request 1)
咁快就想髹晒 D China Motor Bus 俾新記?
Article 12: (Request 2)
> DA82 (da82@netvigator.com) said:
> 甩左T-BANNER廣告就會咁.
> LV5都試過.
> DA82,HB8095.
又係喎, T-BANNER 個位得別有光澤 ...
Article 12: (Request 3)
早幾日見過架 DA85 (好似係) 又係落左 banner 架車白雪雪, 靈機一矚
諗下若果中記將全架車貼層膠紙保護住, 一年搣一張, 咁就可以 keep 到架車
新蓄蓄, 唔駛俾果 D 衰野藥水「也母」壞架車.
Article 13:
Re: 最多巴士線
R Lai (raymansc@asiaonline.net) at Thu May 7 21:39, 1998 said:
> BB (jacob@hknet.com) said:
> 請問那個巴士總站最多巴士路線？
九龍區
1.大角咀
2.九龍城碼頭
3.佐敦道碼頭.
好明顯大部份都是在碼頭,
觀碼,荃碼都不少.
這是我自己記錄,有問題的話,send e-mail 給我.
Article 13: (Request 1)
交易廣場﹖
Article 13: (Request 2)
> S3BL390 (s967817@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) said:
>
> It Should be Tsim Sha Tsui Ferry Pier.
>
> S3BL390
在尖沙咀碼頭做總站和經過的路線有：
1, 1A, 2, 2C, 5, 5A, 5C, 6, 6A, 7, 8, 8A, 9, 203, 208, 215X,
244X, 252B, 257B, 258B, 258C, 259B, 259C, 260B, 261B, 267S,
268B, 280P, A1同埋B1。
Article 14:
3N Training Buses
Aqua (tsesh@hkstar.com) at Thu May 7 18:19, 1998 said:
3N1-3 also are the 3N training bus, but today Isaw a DM 3N with training body when I was test History, so what is this register number??
---
Aqua who fell in Indus Valley....
Article 14: (Request 1)
> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:
>
> As reported by other boardmates, 3N2 has NOT been converted into a training bus yet.
冇錯！3N1同3N3都做左青檸巴，遺下3N2繼續為人民服務。
昨日（7/5）見佢行42A（次次唔係42A就42C）
AS3/AV112 風間火月
Article 14: (Request 2)
Last time I saw 3N2 on Rt:6
2102
Article 14: (Request 3)
It should still belong to 'L' depot and most likely you can find it on 42A and some other routes.
100 Wong
Article 15:
Re: 龍運trident是不是轉膠牌?
VA51(塞米一條) (parnell@hkstar.com) at Thu May 7 20:21, 1998 said:
> M12(CZ4418) (matt4127@netteens.net) said:
> 龍運trident的車頭呢排拆晒d牌布,是不是會學母公司用膠牌?
龍運trident係用牌布咩?看落好似膠牌呀!
有無新城躉的photos?想看一下
Article 15: (Request 1)
可能你看到的是剛出牌不久的新車，所以連牌布也來不及被裝上吧﹗
Article 15: (Request 2)
答對, 只有新出牌的龍躉才未裝牌布. 龍運已訂製新牌布, 部分 HS
牌的龍躉已裝上新牌布, 字體跟早期龍躉不同, 詳見另文.
--
車匙!
Article 15: (Request 3)
I think yes, KMB has E?? 膠牌, and Volvo also use them, so Trident maybe like Volvo, change to 膠牌!
I think 牌布is special for Tridents.
---
Aqua
Article 16:
Re: 快線
德褔5D (97089033d@polyu.edu.hk) at Fri May 8 12:04, 1998 said:
> BB (jacob@hknet.com) said:
> 今天搭85M返馬鞍山時，行大隧時用快線，
> 原因是慢線有架壞車，先至可以感受一下
> 巴士行隧道快線的滋味‧
> 請問大家有冇同樣的經驗？
>
> 興奮的BB
你真幸運。
小弟有一次坐８９Ｃ入富安，架８９Ｃ仲係３ＢＬ（ＤＢ XXXX），
入 o左 大老山隧道無幾耐停 o左 o係 度，一停就停 o左 三個字先
郁得番，停 o左 o係 度 o既 時候，在車內又熱又焗，空氣又混濁，
幾 '手羅' 命！後來發現原來有一架貨車在慢線壞車，我們自然在經
過隧道職員指揮下轉出快線，不過，當架８９Ｃ過 o左 架貨車之後，
就入返慢線。
5D 德褔花園 往 紅磡 (循環線)
每日 6:00-24:00 服務
車費:$3.5 行車里數:18.1 km 行車時間:60 min
Article 16: (Request 1)
I have taken LA21(112) in XHT on right over 70km/h.
Article 16: (Request 2)
請問巴士行快線有冇錯？﹝正常情況下﹞
記得兩年前搭98D入將軍澳，到機隧入口時，
由於慢線去機場很多車排隊，個司機不想排隊，
所以他用了快線行畢全程，他有冇錯呢？
BB
Article 16: (Request 3)
> BB (jacob@hknet.com) said:
> 請問巴士行快線有冇錯？﹝正常情況下﹞
正常情況下是不容許的。
Article 16: (Request 4)
小弟有過以下經歷:
六、七年前坐都普鴨74A出觀塘, 行到獅隧中間, 忽然前面架大貨櫃
著死火燈停低擺街, 師傅一句唔該就扭軑出快線 (當時係晚黑八九點).
究竟依正規矩, 架巴士係唔係要停定係慢線, 等到隧道公司o黎拖車,
或者係隧道公司職員指揮o的車抽出快線至准扒頭?
黃埔十二甲 字
Article 17:
Re: 紅黃城躉
Schneider (schneide@netvigator.com) at Thu May 7 19:47, 1998 said:
> 問題青年 (makhome@netteens.net) said:
> 有冇人有紅黃城躉的車牌及載客量?
係53+25+1呀.
坐完2117,2118,2122的
Schneider
Article 17: (Request 1)
> VA51(塞米一條) (parnell@hkstar.com) said:
>
> 53+25+1!??
> 只得一個企位!?
> fO.o........
果'1'個會唔會係輪椅位?
龍神丸
Article 17: (Request 2)
坐位編排同2100一樣.
'1'個輪椅位呀.
Article 18:
Wow! 這也行﹖﹗
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Thu May 7 21:21, 1998 said:
Here is an article extracted from the West Australian (17.4.98):
以下文章節錄自West Australian (17.4.98):
ALL THRILLS AND SPILLS ON THE BUSES
Here is the equation. Two buses, two lanes, two drivers, one set of traffic lights and one resignation. And being great fans of the late Julius Sumner Miller, we simply ask: Why is it so?
Inside Cover is very interested in a so-called accident involving a Gosnells-bound Swan Transit bus, carrying punters, which was hurtling up the right lane of Barrack Street on Easter Friday.
Next to it, and travelling at the same considerable speed, was another Swan Transit bus, this one Kalamunda-bound.
Anyway, as the Gosnells bus braked to turn right into St George's Terrace, it cleaned up a set of traffic lights. We were told that the impact of the crash actually split the diesel tank and fuel split over the Terrace. It was not until a security guard chased the bus down the street that the driver stopped. So we were told.
We also heard that the buses were actually racing each other up Barrack Street. Surely not! We rang bus union chief Steve Fuller who described the accident as 'quite bizarre'. He believed the buses weren't racing, they were just pushed for time.
'Since the private contractors have taken over, they have cut down the running times and the time allowed to complete the route is almost unbelieveable,' Mr. Fuller said. 'Drivers are needing to run a lot faster to keep to time.'
His guess was that the Gosnells driver got in the right-hand lane to overtake the Kalamunda bus because he needed to stick to his tight schedule. We rang Swan's main man, Neil Smith, to get his version of events.
Mr. Smith categorically denied that the two drivers had been racing, the fuel tank had split or that a guard had to chase the disabled bus. He added that the bus driver involved had resigned from the company later that night.
'The driver misjudged the lane he was in,' Mr. Smith said. 'He committed a driving error. I think he realised that he had driven in a way that was not acceptable to the company, so he resigned.'
He then honked: 'Metrobus hits things every day of the week, but you do not write stories about them (we would if we knew about them, cobber). Do you write a story every time someone hits an awning?'
Privatisation - keeping public transport safe.
Article 18: (Request 1)
> 100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) said:
>
> Are non-Australian bus fans supposed to understand this article/joke? I'm just curious.
Well, you can simply try to comment on the incident, mate.
Article 18: (Request 2)
> 100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) said:
>
> I'm sorry, though terms like Swan, Gosnells, St George's Terrace, and Kalamunda-bound just don't ring a bell in my mind. Hence I lost interest in reading the whole article for the first time.
>
> If you can elaborate the significances of these terms, it would probably help more readers to better understand the article.
OK. Here are the explanations of the terms stated above:
Swan Transit: the Perth bus operator involved in this incident.
Gosnells & Kalamunda: the intended destinations for the buses involved.
St George's Terrace: the place where the accident happened.
I hope this can enable more readers to understand this article.
Article 19:
Re: Cityflyer FLEET NO?
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Thu May 7 22:16, 1998 said:
> Jacky (williamc@tsl.net.hk) said:
>
> IS THIS FROM 2113~2162 orFROM 2117~2166?
It should be 2112-2161.
Article 19: (Request 1)
> eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:
> 咁 2100-2111 又係咩黎架?
2100 咪靚靚都普躉囉 (同你同館長坐 E11 o個架喎 ...)
2101-2111 咪亞歷山大版機場躉囉 ...
--
很奇怪你會問呢個問題的
車匙!
Article 19: (Request 2)
> eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:
>
> 絕不奇怪, 我當然知 2100 係豪華城躉, 2101-2111 係亞記城躉,
> 但第一篇文問 CityFlyer Fleet No., Dennis Law 淨係答 2112-2161,
> 咁我咪想知 2100-2111 係咪囉....又話遲 D 貼番個 logo o既?
> 咁駛唔駛入廠髹過油?
誰說2100-2111會補貼‘Cityflier’的logo的﹖
Article 19: (Request 3)
他不是在指近日出牌的那批紅黃‘烏蠅’嗎﹖
Article 20:
Re: 東涌→中環/銅鑼灣 MTR$14 vs E11$21
LA11 Shing (b493332@hkstar.com) at Fri May 8 01:22, 1998 said:
> VA-61 (kyy690@netvigator.com) said:
> 行政會議已定了機鐵及地鐵東涌線的收費表,其中由東涌去中環/銅鑼灣
> 的收費為:
>
> 成人單程$23.00
> 成人八達通$20.00
> 小童、學生及長者單程$11.50
> 小童、學生及長者八達通$10.00
>
> 仲有,如果使用<<成人八達通>>在星期一至五(假日除外)8:00am前或9:00am-9:30am
> 由東涌站入閘可享受七折優惠,即由東涌至上環-天后(沿途各站)
> 只收:$14.00
>
> 咁如果到時城記的E11的搭客會否轉坐地鐵?
> 會否因為:「快、平、正」?
>
>
> 東涌線問題專家
> VA-61~~~~~~東區郡主
如果我o個日有空閒時間o既話 , 我諗我都會幫襯
'' 地鐵東涌線 '' , 因為我都想體會一下佢入東涌o既
時候的那種感覺 , 至於幫襯開城記E11o既 '' 客仔 ''
嘛 , 如果佢o地係 '' 非常趕時間 '' o既話 , '' 地鐵東
涌線 '' 就o岩o西喇 , 因為 '' 夠o西快 '' 嘛 ; 至於 '' 平 '' ,
就會係另外一個原因 ; '' 正 '' 就唔駛多講啦 , 係咪 ??
LA11 Shing FF7869
Article 20: (Request 1)
> John Shum (johnshum@chevalier.net) said:
>
> But E11 always use Trident --> more comfortable than Airport
> Railway, also, it should be much easy to have a sit by
> bus than MTR. So, I will choose E11 if I have time
但是E11的車程比地鐵東涌線慢,就算o的位舒服又點呢?
因為如果搭巴士車程變數好多,例如:塞車阻慢的行車時間...等等.
香港人做事係:「分秒必爭」,已最快交通為標準.
Article 21:
Sensible Bus Enthusiasts 正常巴士迷
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Thu May 7 16:06, 1998 said:
How would you define this term?
對於這個名詞，你們會怎樣界定它的定義呢﹖
Article 21: (Request 1)
> Thomas Kwong (twlkwong@netvigator.com) said:
>
> Well, my definition of a sensible bus fan would be someone who doesn't destroy buses and behaves sensibly in public. I'm really unhappy that AL1 is gone now because of that 'long haired' looser.
I would agree with the definition above, and may I add a bus enthusiast should also use his or her knowledge, such as route information, to help others who don't know much about buses.
He or she should also be responsible to keep the buses they love in good shape, (not mechanically, of course!) such as keeping an eye on those who drink, eat, and draw graffiti on buses. Warn them and report them as necessary.
100 Wong
Article 22:
要加晒2字頭就煩咯...
wp12a (gw7112li@netvigator.com) at Fri May 8 07:49, 1998 said:
> BB (jacob@hknet.com) said:
> 那麼85M也是全冷馬，
> 為何不叫285M呢？
若果轉全冷就要加2字頭, 咁呢渣線都要改:
8A, 34, 34M, 74X, 75X, 82X, 85C, 89C, 89D
重有下個月o既
64M, 68M, 68X, 69M, 69X
九龍公司一貫政策, 係盡量少o的改number, 免得乘客投訴'點解冇o左條線'?
等於點解深碼冇船搭就快六年, 個總站仍然係叫 '深水[土步]碼頭' .
依家又多個有名無實o既 '佐敦道碼頭' !
p.s. 係大埔o的站牌, 74X同75X用o左全冷車o既黃底紅字.
黃埔十二甲 字
Article 22: (Request 1)
因為 286M 一開線已經全冷, 85M 係舊年六月先全冷.
況且改路線編號會引起混亂.
Article 23:
Re: Why......
100 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) at Thu May 7 21:02, 1998 said:
> EVA-01 (s7904804@netvigator.com) said:
> Do u know why Leyland has closed?What's the reason?
> u can also use ICQ to find me:11872042
Leyland underwent a major financial problem in 1987 which led to a new management team, who apparently didn't do a good job and wasn't able to save the company.
100 Wong
Article 23: (Request 1)
> N1 (s977553@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) said:
>
> Is it Volvo has taken over Leyland?
Yes.Volvo has taken over Leyland.
Article 24:
今日鴨廠
eriC (dart@netvigator.com) at Thu May 7 21:10, 1998 said:
今日下午三點幾到過鴨廠,見到以下新車:
富豪十一米
983 未出牌 已貼上Banner -- 駱駝煙(左),nautica(右)
985 HS8397
986 未出牌 已貼上Banner -- 駱駝煙(左)
988 未出牌 已貼上Banner -- 駱駝煙(左),珍寶冷氣(右)
989 未出牌
990 未出牌
992 未出牌
單層MAN
1502 未出牌
1503 未出牌
1509 未出牌
1510 未出牌
1511 未出牌
城巴機場快線
2113 HS8204
2116 HS7792
2117 HS8472
2118 未出牌
2121 HS8500
2122 HS7876
2126 未出牌
下午四點幾臨上利東前,在鴨俐洲橋道見到2116,2117兩兄弟一齊離開
鴨俐洲,當時攪 '私家車 P' ,原來係出市區行1號!
補充:
三點幾見到2500被四軸工程車拖往海廠(我估)
四點幾2500已經係鴨廠
今日考完中文來個小遊的
eriC
(聽日考英文啦!)
Article 24: (Request 1)
好彩我影左遮~~~
唔怪得嚮金鐘站突然間踢2500走.
智叔
MC7 - BV2050
Article 24: (Request 2)
At about 17:30, I saw 1502, 1509 and 1511
at Tuen Mun Highway (near So Kwun Wat)
towards Tuen Mun. Do any boardmates know
why they go to Tuen Mun/Yuen Long?
A340
Article 25:
[網站更新]港島巴士網站
Colin Chang (kalim@netvigator.com) at Thu May 7 23:21, 1998 said:
由於電腦硬碟壞了，故只更新了主頁，加了兩項有關新巴的消息。
至於整個網站的更新工作，相信最快要下星期五才可以完成。
Island Buses eXpress
Article 25: (Request 1)
唉！連自己網站果url都打錯......唔該晒智叔！
Article 26:
E41大埔中心----新機場地面運輸中心
LA11 Shing (b493332@hkstar.com) at Fri May 8 01:39, 1998 said:
> 沙電學徒 (ranger@hknet.com) said:
> E41 幾時開?行什么路?會吾會經沙田?
> 吾該有冇有關IMFORMATIOM呢?
>
>
>
> 非常之曾英文的
> 沙電學徒 字
有 , 根據單張所講 , E41是由 :
大埔中心 ---- 新機場地面運輸中心 ,
途經 : 大埔 , 沙田 , 大圍 , 城門隧道 ,
青衣 , 青嶼幹線 , 東涌 , 新機場地面運輸中心 ,
班次 : 每 9-12 分鐘一班 ,
收費 : $ 13.00
將會o係新機場開o既時候開辦此線(即係E41).
本線係經沙田o既 .
路線305支持者
LA11 Shing FF7869
Article 26: (Request 1)
> 咁你又錯了, 呢條線初初就係諗住經沙田, 但後來俾人投訴兜得太勁,
> 所以開左 E42 之後, E41 唔會再兜沙田. 應該會學 73X 咁直接入城隧.
E41 用咩車行?
Article 27:
Re: 854新顏色！
Michael Tsui 870/973 (tsuifamy@speednet.net) at Fri May 8 11:42, 1998 said:
> DA54 (da54@netteens.net) said:
> 琴日去新鴻基中心睇杜老誌道天橋轉彎的巴士... (870?!)
Don't Make fun of my old rep. bus!
>
> 當一架很新淨的城龍上橋時, 當堂呆了一呆, 駛過來時,
> 清楚看見 854 上顏色的變動:
>
> 紅色和藍色的比例變成一樣，紅色部分減低至
> 「三長」「兩短」散熱網的中間, 新食鬼logo環繞的是全黃色...
>
> Ps.此車行118,曾為全身廣告,現有banner....
>
> ---
> 另:昨日生果「活力校園」版下方有新巴向中巴員工發出的通告,
> 通知他們出席講座及登記....
Article 28:
中記司機早更夜更
Claymon (claymon@cyberec.com) at Fri May 8 10:22, 1998 said:
近日在報章看到新巴廣告關於現有中巴員工轉職安排,
並在下列時間辦理轉職登記:
9, 11, 12/5 - 1000至1200
13, 14, 15/5 - 1400至1600
17/5 - 1900至2100
咁我就有以下一個問題:
通常司機分早更同夜更, 咁早更同夜更大約時間編排是怎樣?
我就懷疑中巴早更司機除了17號得閑外, 其餘時間都唔得.
近排聽中巴司機講原來中巴無通知司機呢件事......
廣告下面仲有新巴臨時查詢電話, 不如 eddie lam 試下打去,
睇下有無熱線員阿頭做. ^_^
電話 : 21473623
智叔
MC7 - BV2050
Article 28: (Request 1)
佢間公司o岩o岩建立, 就已經有企業傳訊部, 都唔知係咪由其他新世界公司
調人手過去. 不過有個臨時查詢電話都好過冇, 但我都係希望佢會
登廣告請人....仲有....唔想俾 D 巴士迷唔夠兩日就霸晒 D 位....
Article 29:
究竟誰是誰非﹖
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Fri May 8 04:38, 1998 said:
在98年5月6日的‘今日所見’中，我看到以下的一段﹕
2.2118 行 E11
(From: DA74(780), Thu May 7 16:41, 1998)
可是在以下的一篇文章中，我又看到以下的一段﹕
http://home.hkstar.com/~kenf/hkbdb/read.cgi?t=9716&a=1
城巴機場快線
2113 HS8204
2116 HS7792
2117 HS8472
2118 未出牌
2121 HS8500
2122 HS7876
2126 未出牌
究竟誰是誰非﹖
Article 29: (Request 1)
> Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) said:
> 莫非上晝未出牌, 下晝出o左牌行 E11?
問題是，有人指在5月6日看到2118行走E11﹐可是又有人說在5月7日看到未出牌的2118。
到底是有人時運低，還是......
Article 30:
兩部 city flyer
Stanley Yung (n281@hkstar.com) at Fri May 8 01:30, 1998 said:
從非正式得來的消息
昨日已有兩部 city flyer 行走
暫屬城一區
後轉二區
今日 17:30 坐905
在菲林明道口見一隻蒼蠅(2117)轉入軒尼詩道
立刻拍下VIDEO
在五月六日,一部行過11
Article 30: (Request 1)
以我所知，為數很像不止兩部。
Article 31:
[建議]226X , Shun Lee -- China HK Ferry
TONY (s614671@netvigator.com) at Thu May 7 22:50, 1998 said:
[建議]226X , Shun Lee -- China HK Ferry Terminal
only service 7:30am - 8:30am
and 5:20pm-6:20pm every 10mins
To China ferry terminal, via:
Lee On Road, Shun Tin bus terminal, Shun On Road, Sau Mau Ping road,
Hip Wo Street, Tsui Ping Road, Lee Yue Mun Road, Wai Fat Road,
Kwun Tong By Pass, Kai Fuk Road, Airport Tunnel, Kowloon East Corridor,
Chatham Road N, Gascoigne Road, Jordon Road, Canton Road, Kowloon Park Drive,
Salisbury road, Star Ferry Pier, Kowloon Park Drive
To Shun Tin, via:
Canton Road, Jordon Road, Nathan Road, Gascoigne road, Chatham Road N,
Kowloon East Corridor, Airport Tunnel, Kai Fuk Road, Kwun Tong By Pass,
Wai Fat Road, Cha Kwo Ling Road, Kwun Tong Road, Hip Wo street,
Sau Mau Ping Road, Shun On Road, Lee On Road
a/c bus service @ HK$6.20/journey
Please comment!
Article 31: (Request 1)
原本都好少comment路線建議, 但竟然殺上黎順利,
TONY仲叫到Please comment, 咁我就唔客氣了!
首先是當然是客量, 不錯, 現時順利區沒有路線往
中港碼頭一帶, 但一般乘客都會搭 26 行過去, 不是
太遠, 但這線卻經觀塘, 雖然行機隧, 但速度定比
26 慢得多(26半小時內到), 而且貴得多, 不會吸引
乘客的. 觀塘乘客已可乘搭 215X, 本線沒有作用.
26 線乘客量未算飽和, 也沒有需要新線協助.
其實以前九巴曾計劃 226X 線經機隧取代 26,
乘機收特快線價, 但實在不比 26 線快, 一片反對
聲下割置了.
上午 26 線都只是 8 分一班, 此線可達 10 分一班?!
另外這個時間表要成七架車, 繁忙時間過後怎樣安置?
要知道九記 (假設此線是九記做) 車每日最少行八小時,
繁忙時間過後有七架車無大用, 不合乎經濟原則.
既然係單程行走便不用找終站停泊, 無需要出完尖碼又
返回中港碼頭吧. 乘客在經過中港碼頭時已可以落車了.
Ricky Chan
Article 32:
Re: 有關2500行8X/118
Claymon (claymon@cyberec.com) at Thu May 7 23:00, 1998 said:
> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:
> 據悉2500短期內會是8X/118的字軌車。故各板友在短期內，可以無需在‘今日所見’
> 中提及這個消息，直至另行通知為止。
其實如果唔係有板友寫2200行8X, 我都唔會多手寫埋.
多手怪的智叔
MC7 - BV2050
Article 33:
Re: 新褔記35首航!
cky (kyfchiu@netvigator.com) at Fri May 8 01:11, 1998 said:
> Dickson2 (dickson2@macau.ctm.net) said:
> 明早 6:30 為新褔記 35線首航! 但是開車地點不是海洋花園總站,
> 而是賽馬會. 我真是有點 R 頭!
可否介紹一下這條線呢?
我在復活節時到過澳門,在旅遊司的counter度拿過一份旅遊圖,
都見到有加到36....(???去賽馬會),算 update o卦?
cky
Article 34:
Re: Which bus route is......
eddie lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) at Thu May 7 21:42, 1998 said:
AV107 (tangeric@netvigator.com) said:
> Which Bus Route is:
計唔計境外線? 境外唔識答, 丁蟹一定識. ^_^
> 1.The MOST Expensive Route in Hong Kong?
暫時仲係 869, $38.
過多兩個月就係 A12, $45.
> 2.The CHEAPEST Route in Hong Kong?
要取巧的話, 答你免費接駁巴士, K15, K16, K17....
要收錢o既, 係 71B, $1.20
Article 35:
Re: 坡柴....
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Thu May 7 21:45, 1998 said:
> Jacky Chong (mingtin@netteens.net) said:
> 小弟今日搭車經過吐露港公路, 見到有4-5架坡柴向
> 上水方向駛去, 請問它們是否要被肢解呢?
> 請多多指教
機會很大。因為有消息指城巴只會保留三部坡柴作為員工巴士，另外保留少量作為訓
練車。
Article 36:
拜托，呢兩架係乜車？
BUSPA (wcw@hkstar.com) at Thu May 7 21:15, 1998 said:
請問這兩架係咩車？(I mean fleet number)
我唔係好清楚....
先謝
BUSPA
Article 36: (Request 1)
BUSPA (wcw@hkstar.com) said:
只要搵下字軌表就掂晒.
3AV95
>
VA18
Article 37:
Re: New singer deck MAN in Pofulam Road
安迪安 (h9703053@hkusua.hku.hk) at Thu May 7 22:07, 1998 said:
> tim (kwokping@hkstar.com) said:
> Today in about 4.15p.m. i saw 3 singer deck man travel
> across the pokfulam road near the termius of 103.
> do anyone know more information about these man?
我只見到1502, 個路線牌攪9號!
Article 38:
[廣告] The Bus Homepage
Edward Hong (edhong@netvigator.com) at Thu May 7 20:16, 1998 said:
My homepage have update: Bus Tour ~ 40M Wan Chai Ferry - Wah Fu )N)
Welcome to my homepage,
my homepage address: http://home.netvigator.com/~edhong
or http://www.hkid.com/people/edhong
Thank you to visit my hompage.
The Bus Homepage
Edward Hong
Article 38: (Request 1)
點解明明講 40M, 又擺架 40 上去o既?
嗯...原來嚮 St. Paul 度影過去真係幾㊣喎....等我試下先....
仲有呢, 40M 有 8-15 分鐘咁密架??
Article 39:
Re: 擺街過夜
VA51(塞米一條) (parnell@hkstar.com) at Thu May 7 20:24, 1998 said:
> BB (jacob@hknet.com) said:
> 上星期我搭尾班N281返馬鞍山，
> 經過大圍火車站時見到很多熱狗擺街過夜
> 還好像有一架冷馬，請問點解不返廠呢？
那麼,點解中記d車周圍擺?
無位丫嘛~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:p
Article 40:
Re: Warning
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Thu May 7 15:14, 1998 said:
> Ku King Ho (fatku@school.net.hk) said:
> I have seen a KMB Victory was seen in Aberdeen when it was running on rt. 170 in April, 1998.
A Victory II serving on 170 in April 1998?! Probably you've seen a ghost bus, as it is absolutely ridiculous!
Please beware that posting false information on HKBDB cannot be accepted here.
Article 41:
Re: E42 廷長服務時間
沙電學徒 (ranger@hknet.com) at Thu May 7 22:45, 1998 said:
> Pirro Cheunng (y931204@netvigator.com) said:
> To all Discussion Board Mmebers:
> E42將於5月8日起廷長服務時間,時間如下:
> 博康開 :6:00AM---10:10PM
> 赤立角開:6:00AM-----10:30PM
>
O甘好呀!好野,可以去寶連寺/大澳玩成6,7點才回程去東沖市中心轉
E42 回家啦,哈哈!!!!
Article 42:
3N1
Ku King Ho (fatku@school.net.hk) at Thu May 7 14:43, 1998 said:
I saw 3N1 during the Easter Holiday, but it has been converted to a Training Bus.
Article 43:
Re: 奧港中心巴士站
德褔5D (97089033d@polyu.edu.hk) at Fri May 8 12:46, 1998 said:
> 肥豬 (johnshum@chevalier.net) said:
> 今日去大角咀八下有冇機鐵試車後, 行經海景街,
> 看到奧港中心的巴士站大概有10條坑.
> 唔知第日有邊條線會用此為terminal???
會不會是將大角嘴總站的路線搬過去，因為大角嘴總站是臨時的，而且
Ｅ２１的牌布都是寫〝大角嘴機鐵站〞，所以Ｅ２１未來的總站應
該在奧海城／奧運機鐵站。
不過，十條坑夠不夠所有大角嘴的路線呢？
以大角嘴為總站的路線：
13D，16，31B，32，33A，37，43C，66，66X，72，72X，87，87A，87B，
87P，887，42A(特別車)，Ｅ２１。
路過路線：
10，904，905。
5D 德褔花園 往 紅磡 (循環線)
每日 6:00-24:00 服務
車費:$3.5 行車里數:18.1 km 行車時間:60 min
Article 44:
<網頁廣告>KMB 94&99 BUS-PAGE
Matthew Chung (mcchung@hkstar.com) at Fri May 8 11:17, 1998 said:
大家好:
KMB 94&99 BUS-PAGE現已更新!
在'關於94&99'一欄加入BL2行94入西貢總站時的攪牌情況!
並在封面換上配以新布牌的BL1相片!
KMB 94&99 BUS-PAGE
Matthew Chung
Article 45:
廠車費用每月九十萬
Cambie／No.4 Rd.站長 (chankt@lynx.bc.ca) at Fri May 8 08:57, 1998 said:
係唔係「太陽巴士」呀？
文章來源：「柒週刊」４２６期網上版
列治文‧卑詩省‧加拿大 Cambie／No.4 Rd.站長
Article 46:
珠海大混亂!
Dickson2 (dickson2@macau.ctm.net) at Fri May 8 05:59, 1998 said:
前天! 珠海發生地盤地基土坑下陷釀意外, 使到原本的臨時巴士總站
和客運站天要搬遷, 因為現有的拱北巴士總站和客運站要進行重組
工程(早應該啦!), 所以遷往橋光路. 但是由於發生地盤意外, 所以
巴士總站和客運站一再搬遷, 搬遷的地方不太清楚, 總之使到珠海
客運交通十分混亂!
Dickson2
Article 47:
Good! No Fee Increase 好彩無加價
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Fri May 8 02:24, 1998 said:
It sounds quite lucky for me this year, as there is no membership fee increase for being a BFW overseas member.
看來我也好好彩。今年巴士迷世界海外會員的會費，並無加價。
Article 48:
3AD引擎蓋則的兩盞小燈
eriC (dart@netvigator.com) at Thu May 7 23:41, 1998 said:
今朝坐架LA23去考試,係柴灣道被架3AD爬頭(羞家!),
於是我碌大對眼認住架3AD......
點知被我見到佢果兩盞小燈(引擎蓋則),o既其中上面果盞黃燈
一路行(爬我頭!)一路閃,幾驚佢會爆炸呀!
究竟點解盞黃燈會閃o既?
覺得呢幾日搭巴士去考試,仲得意過日日搭102返學的
eriC
Article 49:
2200 + 2500 影車記
Claymon (claymon@cyberec.com) at Thu May 7 22:53, 1998 said:
今日終於得閒影2200同2500, 於是小弟半日旅程就係咁......
0912 - 0915
我落到樓下(興民天橋底), 諗住等到邊架上邊架. 唔夠三分鐘,
架2200就慢慢上到來.
一如日前板友所說, 架車以唔夠10km/hr上山, o的引擎聲仲係好怪,
點解部車整左都係咁?
0922
當架車落到筲官時, 見到876跪左, 但車上乘客已全部離開.
876車長話部車無端端咇咇聲, 唯有停嚮巴士站.
p.s. Joseph兄, 876乘客可能已上了另一部8X, 總之的客無上到2200.
0945
在維園外見到2500嚮對頭線, 心中有數會幾時回來.
1005
2200終於到總站, 我就影了幾張靜態相, 過程順利.
1005 - 1100
我到太古廣場天橋望巴士, 但係見唔到城巴機場快線巴士喔!
1100 - 1120
我走番去8X總站等2500, 個心仲驚緊2500會唔會跳飛機行118時 (因為
118在0930-1045碓實是城記時段), 2500來到!
當時8X站內有4部車(連2500), 但通常只泊三架車. 見到站長叫車長簽簿,
知道可能突然踢2500走, 於是便連相都無影, 就走去室內的巴士總站搭.
(因為這些情況總站唔上客)
1120-1207
2500確實非常好力, 上柴灣道時仍然非常自如(有45km/hr!)
不過行東區走廊時, 我覺得自己坐在飛氈添~~~
1207-1210
到了小西灣, 第一件事當然是影相! 不過我趕時間, 無等前面架車走,
所以只影了車尾. (我之前已影了動感版車頭相)
同時我亦見到一名著校服學生影2500,
唔知係咪板友?
最後去了搭82走左.
今次收穫總算豐富 ^_^
智叔
MC7 - BV2050
Article 50:
待落穫的牛河一碟
VA51(塞米一條) (parnell@hkstar.com) at Thu May 7 22:45, 1998 said:
小弟想在聽日周五(5月8日)早上去食(去)中記牛河.有無人
要食(去)?
有意參加者,請快快聯絡我
ICQ # : 5918356
E-MAIL: parnell@hkstar.com
Pager : 78332925
路線待參加者同我於今晚12點一齊決定.
請於5月7日23:59前聯絡.釘橋!
Article 51:
最先行駛汀九橋的巴士線
DL (kwleung@netvigator.com) at Thu May 7 22:43, 1998 said:
就係城巴79R, 903R, 904R及925R.
Article 52:
Corgi城巴模型
Robert (roberthk@netvigator.com) at Thu May 7 21:13, 1998 said:
Today, I saw the Corgi Citybus model release in market.
It was painted in normal Citybus livery. (Yellow, red & blue)
The price is HK$250 in Sheung Wan 西港城 and 巴士世界.
Article 53:
過去,現在,未來
N1 (s977553@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) at Thu May 7 20:51, 1998 said:
過去+現在以荃灣地鐵站作總站的有哪些呢...
32M,38M,39M,41M,59M,60M,66M,68M,
238M,243M(還有沒有呢?)
未來的荃灣地鐵站巴士總站又會如何?
Article 54:
DB
DA74(780) (c3035083@hkstar.com) at Thu May 7 17:16, 1998 said:
When do the NLB's DART and BENZ servics?
Article 55:
九巴,中巴,城巴
BB (jacob@hknet.com) at Thu May 7 17:35, 1998 said:
請問以上三間巴士公司現在有多少架巴士？
Article 56:
巴士公司選舉
DA90(38字軌車) (refchan@netteens.net) at Thu May 7 16:57, 1998 said:
本人現在尋求各板友對巴士公司的意見:
歡迎各板友投票選出最佳巴士公司
1. 中記
2. 九記
3. 城記
請以電郵方式投票!
Article 57:
2122試車
John--2100 (jmtng@hknet.com) at Thu May 7 16:12, 1998 said:
今日坐917(ADS???,GT317)返香港,係西隧九龍入口突然見到一架紅
黃城躉----2122!!
車頭貼'CityFlyer';車尾貼金色城巴新logo.
但架車暫冇駕易通,要用普通通道俾錢入隧道.之後我所乘的巴士
再不見2122的蹤影.
2122的車牌是HS 7876
John--2100
Article 58:
2118 遊記
Gakei! (95261675d@polyu.edu.hk) at Fri May 8 13:24, 1998 said:
今日一早去到林士街站捕「城蠅」, 先搭 917 去到林士街下車,
先送o左部 2118 車尾, 跟住我就上行人天橋等其他「城蠅」到
站, 點知又俾我見到另一架「城蠅」2113, 車頭冇攪牌, 唔知
佢行咩線, 後來見佢停永安站, 原來佢係行 917 的. 冇幾耐,
2117 到達林士街站, 埋站後司機/站長們表示架車唔再開. 見
佢車頭車尾o的水牌都唔齊, 有o的奇怪. 跟住有 2116 和 2118
相繼埋站, 平排三架「城蠅」出現林士街, 相信將來不常見吧!
後來 2118 先開, 我便上了它, 一直坐到去跑馬地總站. 當巴士
再開時, 遇上會考完畢, 大批妹妹仔 (今日考乜? 真的全女班喔.)
擁至 2118, 搞到架車遲遲未能開出. 其中有個女仔跟友人說:
「今朝我見過呢o的新車行 917 呀.」後來巴士開了, 我也徒步
落去搭 5A 轉 300 號回來了. 在乘 300 號途中, 又見到 2121
行 917, 見到呀 Ronald 板友跟司機喋喋不休, 唔知傾乜呢?
2118 及其他「城蠅」係 ZF 波箱, 車內格局跟 2100 相似, 都是
使用同款座椅, 但下層車尾的部分「倒頭位」變了向前. 車的色調為
深粉紅, 包括座椅和車身內牆. 車身除有金色新食鬼撈稿外, 還特製
了一些新的金色標貼, 如「太平門掣 不可亂動」, 「水唧壺」等.
陣間五點半放學後睇下有冇時間 SCAN 一些相擺上來啦, 至於想睇多
些相, 就留意今個禮拜日我個網頁喇 ^_^!
--
在拉記的
車匙!
Article 59:
往新機場
金魚 (n960@hkabc.net) at Fri May 8 13:51, 1998 said:
大家會坐機場巴士,機鐵,普通巴士或其他車去新機場呢?
我住屯門,一定坐E33往機場啦!13蚊平到笑啦!
金魚字
Article 60:
不知所謂的牛河:
AV89 (ngpt@netvigator.com) at Fri May 8 13:56, 1998 said:
今日想出去尖沙咀影車, 但張八仔唔見左, 票務處又有八仔賣, 唯有買張單
程票應急.
一出到地面, 就見到AA2行203!!! 真係嚇到hang左机!
(金魚:AA2是L廠超級大後備, 根本唔會出來行!)
(金魚,please dont' said 'Don't take me on the table!':P)
後定神, 拿相机, 跑過馬路, 為何? 影早晨特別線也. 不過, 268b五架有
四架都是[手羅]快線轉入梳士巴利道的, 真是要'跳飛机'才可以影到二三架.
話時話,等左咁耐, 點解架AA2仲未返來呢? 是否出事呢? 於是去尖東睇下,
飛標都冇枝, 何況神出鬼沒的AA2呢? 於是, 就坐110返佐碼. 忽然,架AA2
又出現在眼前!! 真懷疑自己有冇眼花! 心想:架AA2都是有去無回之物,
有三頭六臂都好難捕到佢, 不如在佐碼影下車算啦! 但是, 除左架油了廣告的N363
特別些外, 根本冇乜好影, 就行去西隧口坐九六Ｏ去找金魚啦!
有分說:
九記雖冇跳飛机, 怪車總神出鬼沒;
凡車到站總返回, 芳魂一去無影[足宗].
話說回頭,架960個司机都幾狼,在小欖落斜一段開到八十幾,緊貼前車,
還cut出快線!! 乜巴士都可以用快線咩?!
到了良景, 一看, 只用了半粒鐘! 960真快!
看到金魚兄在流動服務中心是意料中事, 他還大爆內幕, 話他在板上放了些流料
(本人不便明言, 費時金魚兄又話我'Take him on the table'.:P
佢仲話巴鼠埋世界將會有參觀柴廠活動, 但名額只得三十人. 乜巴鼠埋世真是那麼窮嗎?
之後, 我就坐了架上層載滿垃极的S3BL404返歸了. 好彩冇坐霸王車的小生物咋! ^_^
正是:
車廂不清洗, 難免昆蟲生;
本是同窗友, 何必亂灌水?
見有230X去尖沙咀都冇坐的AV89
Article 61:
43S, 81S
Chicken (h9719507@hkusua.hku.hk) at Fri May 8 15:03, 1998 said:
我記得九巴43S有好幾個版本:
1. 青衣市 -- 荃灣碼頭
通用88年至90年(唔肯定邊年)的張裝新市鎮街道圖都有刊載.唔知係
o係咩日子開o既呢?
2. 葵芳地鐵站 -- 香港科技學院(青衣)
請問有冇多D資料呢?我淨係記得葵芳個站o係而家235M個位度.
3. 荃灣地鐵站至美景花園 (循環線?)
即N43前身
另想問81S是否循環線?
Thanx.
Chicken
Article 62:
中記在屯門
S3BL423 (ckcling@netvigator.com) at Fri May 8 15:00, 1998 said:
頭先約 2:50有一部中記(好似DM)路線好似係 8
我向屋企落去見到的,開頭以為九記試車.
車身為藍色(....會計廣告),有載人的
於屯門柸渡橋出現,並轉去屯門廠的方向
是員工旅行嗎?
記記得約兩年前,我都成日見
中記寶寶行元朗公路的(員工旅行)
Article 63:
1號遊記
Schneider (schneide@netvigator.com) at Fri May 8 15:46, 1998 said:
今日小弟又甫黃紅Trident.
小弟在林士街總站影倒架21??打90B牌.
跟住我就比成班師博站長圍住,話0個度影
靚d,又開個中門斜台板出我影,又'吞'架
車出坑比我影,之後又比我唔駛錢上......
好好人呀!
及後上左2118,個四眼師博話呢架車比其它
噪(2116,2122....)
沿途架車幾好,但當上跑馬地一帶的斜路,
架車就大出洋相.
師博同我講佢已經踩到盡,仲比我睇下.
我望下錶版,架車全程以12Km/h上斜.唉!
師博此時話富豪好過佢(2118).
架車到跑馬地總站,就已經水滾.
我發現呢批Trident有小小弱點,就是上層
首排坐位勁熱,因為冇冷氣出風位.加上唔
知點解呢批車冷氣唔夠,開Hi一樣熱.
仲有師博話呢批車已鎖但唔知鎖幾多.
師博又話呢批車有ABS,佢又話d新富豪有,
係0米真呢?
個師博都係巴士迷離架
考完Listening的
Schneider
Article 64:
網頁通告+消息
Jess (c5013830@hkbu.edu.hk) at Fri May 8 16:21, 1998 said:
1.我個網頁最快會於25/5開始update,此期問有甚麼新廣告,請e-mail
給我.
2.根據未經證實消息,九巴已著手準備帝國反擊戰;以免城巴在明年
取得天水圍專營權同時大開路線(包括區內線)而被搶客.
3.政府原則上同意專利巴士公司開辦全日行走點對點路線,沿途可不
停部份沿線站(像現時62R).
4.政府為禁止猛毛巴,已禁止各新界鄉村村民自辦鄉村車路線,所有
路線必須註冊為非專利路線(點對點)或專線小巴(沿途接客)線.
而收費則增加了不少,如前九巴84由街車代替後比現時收費增加達
60%,雖有村民反對(不是村民的我也反對,攪到無得去那處行山),但
政府一意孤行.
5.新巴欲攪全港交通營運機構最大的公關部,不過會請多少人則不知.
Article 65:
Re: Definition of 'Cityflyer' 的定義
S3BL390 (s967817@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) at Fri May 8 18:12, 1998 said:
> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:
> Which of the following batch of Tridents should be defined as 'Cityflyer' coaches?
> 究竟‘城巴機場快線’車隊的定義，應該包括以下哪批Trident呢﹖
>
> a. 2100-2161
> b. 2112-2161
> c. 2100, 2112-2161
I think it should be c.( 2100, 2112-2161 )
S3BL390 66M
Article 66:
Re: 巴士之訊幾時有?
Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) at Fri May 8 18:27, 1998 said:
> BR4474 (c6091596@comp.polyu.edu.hk) said:
> 巴士迷世界 O既巴士之訊,
> 自從二月頭出上一期之後,
> 一路都無再出新一期,
> 唔知幾時先有呢?
等多一下吧﹗應該很快就會出版的了。
Article 67:
A633
Jess (c5013830@hkbu.edu.hk) at Fri May 8 16:37, 1998 said:
A633在那裡,還有廣告嗎?如有人有相,可否給我(Hardcopy,not comp.
copy)
廣告部專養的大懶蟲傻Jess
Article 68:
東區星報的一篇文章
michella (samlau88@netvigator.com) at Fri May 8 19:02, 1998 said:
今期東區星報有一篇題為“我對港島巴士服務的意見”的讀者來信，
內容都幾有趣，在下節錄少同大家分享下。
***
耀東村的公共交通於四月二十七日起大轉變，城巴開辦77路線，小巴
50號的收費由二元五角加价至二元七角。
城巴在這個時机，在西灣河，耀興道巴士站告示牌上貼上“收費廣告
”。大大隻字寫著“城巴77，99，往筲箕灣，耀東，二元四角”宣傳
城巴西灣河往耀東，興東車費全村至抵。城巴這次舉動明顯是針對小
巴公司。
本人之一名鄰居為小巴50號線的司机，据他獲悉，近年來，在下午繁
忙時間，太安街經常塞車，每當有巴士埋站，原本等候小巴的村民便
湧至巴士站搭巴士，使小巴轉數不斷減少。料城巴這次的舉動，將再
搶走小巴客....
50號小巴終於因成本上漲而加价。城巴公司竟即乘胜追擊，第二度在
巴士站上賣“平車廣告”(本文另一處已提過城巴曾在巴士站賣廣告)
；顯示出城巴根本不把小巴放在眼內，實行大(中巴)小(小巴)通吃，
使到小本經營，為民服務的小巴公司難以生存...
***
另外文章作者亦希望新巴保留中巴較新型的熱狗。
michella
Article 69:
[齊躉]在沙田廠有得修理?
沙電學徒 (ranger@hknet.com) at Fri May 8 19:01, 1998 said:
由於今日E42延長服務時間,沙田廠亦派3-4部[齊躉]在E42,車牌是HS
今日弟一日巳有2部是沙田廠的[齊躉]埤CAR 佬 [泡]話吾妥,是頭車門升降板
吾妥,我師傅都攪吾惦,要捭修理佬做,修理佬話:油呃系統有事,升降板電氣冇
事,用一個鐘巳修好,我想知下升降板用什么原理操作?
Article 70:
[廣告] 墨爾本巴士庫:巴士實錄 mp3檔案
C Ma (madc@bp.com) at Fri May 8 19:05, 1998 said:
墨爾本巴士庫加入巴士實錄 mp3檔案, 歡迎收聽.
現時之 mp3檔案有平治O305(59秒)及
利蘭 Tiger (約 3分 30秒)
http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/3577/depot.htm
Article 71:
New bus
Sin (a2744@netvigator.com) at Fri May 8 19:16, 1998 said:
When I left school,I saw some new 11m a/c citybus arrive in
container terminal,it only paint in yellow body ,without loco,
I think they are prepare for the expanding in sep .
