香港巴士討論區舊文庫＜新版＞．: 19990520

Articles on 20th May, 1999.

Today's Articles: 83.

Articles' Numbers: (19990520_01-83)

Please press the following links to the articles immediately：

以下連結可直接看到每一篇主文章：

第1篇文第2篇文第3篇文第4篇文第5篇文第6篇文第7篇文第8篇文第9篇文第10篇文

第11篇文第12篇文第13篇文第14篇文第15篇文第16篇文第17篇文第18篇文第19篇文第20篇文

第21篇文第22篇文第23篇文第24篇文第25篇文第26篇文第27篇文第28篇文第29篇文第30篇文

第31篇文第32篇文第33篇文第34篇文第35篇文第36篇文第37篇文第38篇文第39篇文第40篇文

第41篇文第42篇文第43篇文第44篇文第45篇文第46篇文第47篇文第48篇文第49篇文第50篇文

第51篇文第52篇文第53篇文第54篇文第55篇文第56篇文第57篇文第58篇文第59篇文第60篇文

第61篇文第62篇文第63篇文第64篇文第65篇文第66篇文第67篇文第68篇文第69篇文第70篇文

第71篇文第72篇文第73篇文第74篇文第75篇文第76篇文第77篇文第78篇文第79篇文第80篇文

第81篇文第82篇文第83篇文

Article 1:

Re: 有相睇

Gary (busy@netvigator.com) from 202.40.137.110 at Wed May 19 13:10, 1999 said:

> CMB VA52 (HN6509) (va52@hkguy.com) said:

> 小弟前日到錦田 '入貨', 影了幾幅相, 與大家分享一下, 各位不妨

> 對相片給予意見.

>

>

> 不知這架DMS屬於誰的呢?

>

>

> LX290被肢解後的樣子.

>

>

> 左起為LF149, LF34, D1007, D851 及 D??? (睇唔到)

>

> 第一次貼相既

> CMB VA52 (HN6509)

> ICQ: 25234343

是D931

Article 1: (Request 1)

我尋日都有去錦田場, 所見的景像同你影到的差唔多. 遲D晒了相

再貼上來.

o係駕倫敦寶後面白色的就是GA1, 隔籬藍色的就是G544.

我都見到, 不過當時唔知FLEET NO.

--

溫緊三科考試的

輝仔

Article 1: (Request 2)

Did you see G544?

Could you tell me how you go there?

Did you go there on Sunday?

Did you attacked by the wild dogs, or are there dogs barking

at you?

Sorry, too many questions. But I really want to go there.

Thank you very much!

Article 2:

AC vs non-AC service

291(A/B) Siu (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from 202.40.139.40 at Wed May 19 13:32, 1999 said:

There are countless debates & speech wars about AC & non-AC buses under 100/911R/M1/300 Wong's thread of 'Tonight's bus trip on 300', and is extremely expolsive. Mr Wong said it is better to take AC buses for tunnel routes as AC buses use circulation of air inside the cabin, bus LV123 & Gakei disagreed, and think this is even more harmful than hotdog buses. Mr. Wong then said hotdog buses have 100% of air comes from tunnel & is more harmful.

So it is the best time to discuss AC & non-AC service.

It is found that full AC tunnel routes are far more profitable than full hotdog of non full AC tunnel routes.

Take the example of 914. There are very few passengers taking 914, egven it is express route, as NWFB 914 is full hotdog service & no people wants to take hotdog buses to pass tunnel (very hot & polluted!). You can prove this by counting how many passengers taking 914 during NWFB full hotdog cycle!

Tate's Cairn Tunnel routes are other expamles. These routes had very few passengers when they are not full AC, as Tate's Cairn Tunnel is far too polluted. But now then are having profit. KMB 680 is having far fewer than NWFB 680 because NWFB 680 is full AC.

And the 3rd case is Shing Mun Tunnel. All Shing Mun Tunnel routes are full hotdog, except 2xx routes. So these routes always lose money during summer, as most passengers switch to MTR + KCR instead, just for AC. This is seen from emptiness of bus routes.

So it can be conculded that only full AC tunnel routes service can make them attractive & earning money, otherwise people would switch to railways instead.

291(A/B) Siu

Article 2: (Request 1)

我不反對將巴士線轉冷氣是可以吸引一些原本不乘搭巴士

的乘客,增加收入.但是對於那些低收入人士而言,即使巴

士線轉冷氣而變相加價(多達兩成以上),仍然是他們最便

宜的交通工具,他們根本沒處可逃,只可束手就擒,任由巴

士公司凌辱.在舊乘客沒有流失(或少量流失),又有新吸納

乘客的情況下,乘客量上升是自然不過的事.

基於以上論點,我認為閣下的結論('only full AC tunnel

routes service can make them attractive' 這一點只

能於巴士線轉冷氣而沒有加票價(或加幅少於一成)的情況

下適用.

Article 2: (Request 2)

{p.s小弟英文一向好差,見諒~(今年及格就好lo~)}

今日就有好例子了~

話說今朝落雨出荃灣,一來就243M的3AV,

初時以為好彩,但一上樓上,一陣臭到暈的嘔味*o*.......

樓下算吧.(如果熱狗可能無o甘臭~)

回程又是這車,嘔吐物不見了,臭味依舊(弱d啦~)

冷馬雖好,但非完美~

Article 2: (Request 3)

英文好長好難睇!

Article 3:

Re: Where can I download TDT ????

Ken Fung (kenf@hkstar.com) from 202.60.253.146 at Wed May 19 15:19, 1999 said:

> Citybus Friend (kc09707@school.net.hk) said:

> I want this game, do you have the web site to download

Don't know still availible or not. Try:

http://www.tem.nhl.nl/~eijde600/ttddl/

Ken

Article 4:

【大相廣告】九巴都普鴨 (N253) 行 85K 特別車

香港汽車網絡快線 (hanvas@netvigator.com) from 205.252.144.90 at Wed May 19 15:00, 1999 said:

【大相廣告】

　【昔日情懷 Yesterday Memories 】項目更新，

　更新大相：

　　九巴都普鴨 (N253) 行 85K 特別車 .

　　（攝於沙田火車站） .

網址 :　http://home.netvigator.com/~hanvas/hkvne/w990519a.html

Article 5:

Centroliner o係沙田

Oscar餓靚之巴 (ywangtam@netvigator.com) from 208.167.247.114 at Wed May 19 15:35, 1999 said:

I saw a AP at Shatin at about 15:45. The displays at the

back and on the LHS were showing 'P'. It was running at

Tai Chung Kiu Rd. Near Jat Min Chuen. Then It turn into Sha

Kok St. The routing was similar to last time I saw. There

were about 3 persons on the bus.

Why AP always at Shatin?! Will some route at Shatin going

to add AP?!

Oscar餓靚之巴

Article 6:

Complaint: Foul language in opinions!!

291(A/B) Siu (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from 202.40.139.40 at Wed May 19 15:32, 1999 said:

I have to complain to Ken Fung as someone gave me an opinion on my suggestion of changing KMB 68A to Tai Lam Tunnel with foul language.

Please delete his account immediately!

291(A/B) Siu

Article 7:

Re: GA1係乜黎架???!!!

291(A/B) Siu (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from 202.40.139.40 at Wed May 19 15:38, 1999 said:

> 新記104站長 (klw85@hkschool.net) said:

> 如題,thanks

It is an ex-CMB Guy Arab V bus, with front engine & semi-driving cabin, owned by Speedy Bus, and was sent to Bangladesh as a demonstrator for a while.

291(A/B) Siu

Article 8:

必達場係邊???

新記104站長 (klw85@hkschool.net) from 202.40.141.30 at Wed May 19 15:39, 1999 said:

如題,thanks

Article 9:

Centroliner o係沙田

Oscar餓靚之巴 (ywangtam@netvigator.com) from 208.167.247.114 at Wed May 19 15:35, 1999 said:

Article 10:

板友停板通告 0519

Ken Fung (kenf@hkstar.com) from 202.60.253.146 at Wed May 19 16:35, 1999 said:

由於有人於路線建議欄的意見一項中打上粗口字句, 已經被暫時

停板.

P.S. 又停一位... -_- 好玩咩?!

Ken

Article 11:

Re: [討論]大家於本板的習慣.

金魚 (n960@netvigator.com) from 205.252.144.91 at Wed May 19 22:48, 1999 said:

> Chopio Siu (wwt51029@wwt.hkcampus.net) said:

>

> 我已經登記半年了, 看了無數次討論區, 發覺板友都有以下習慣:

> 1. 於結尾加上超連結.

> 2. 有口頭禪及超連結加在結尾.

> 3.大家既文章加上人地編長文去.(睇唔到邊個打邊個)

> 4.沒有的中文字則加上某些附號. 例如: {手羅}??

> 例如:

> 點解有o的字係有既都唔打上去? 例如:*唔*字.

>

> 最尾加上 *車匙* , 點解呢?

> *誓保中華* 的意思是中華巴士抑或大使館被炸?

>

> 個 *o既* 字變左 *既* 字

> 所有口字邊既字, 加上*零*或細偕*O*.

>

> 上文純屬討論. 不要引起罵戰.

小魚有個習慣係在尾後加上'金魚字',因為BDB得我一條金魚

曾經在幾個月前仲加一句金日金句,但係而家無心機諗

所以冇寫

金魚字

Article 11: (Request 1)

> 點解有o的字係有既都唔打上去? 例如:*唔*字.

各有各習慣者,大家明就得啦.

> 最尾加上 *車匙* , 點解呢?

呢個係家祺兄既簽名黎既.

> *誓保中華* 的意思是中華巴士抑或大使館被炸?

哈哈! 我上星期至用過呢個term, 不過唔係指中巴.

仲記唔記得: 北約滾蛋，誓保中華? ^_^

CMB VA52 (HN6509)

Article 11: (Request 2)

1)咁呢個板仲有其他巴士網主玩嘛, 佢地梗係要宣傳一下啦!

4)咁要明確表達意思, 呢個情形好難避免. 例如深水(土步), 一係咁打. 唔係就深水步,

深水寶,有D仲索性深水 . 漏低最尾隻字, 在呢個情況下, 似乎已經不得不接受呢!

車匙是一位板友. 佢打車匙個意思即係寫完一封信簽返個大名咁解.

誓保中華, 意思是中華巴士.

HB610

(簽名O黎O架)

Article 11: (Request 3}

> LV123 (wkywong@net.polyu.edu.hk) said:

>

> 關於第四點, 我相信大多數板友喜歡用廣東話入詞. 所以有以上情形出現.

>

> 5. 仲有係某君專習非成是, 正確的講成是不正確的, 而且對別人的批評

> 只懂扣人帽子, 不會以理服人.

>

>

> '車匙'係板友Gakei!的外號.

>

>

> 呢個亦係某位喜歡中巴的板友在喜歡在文末加上的字罷了.

>

>

> 'o既'字係打唔到的, (假如打到請通知我), 所以要加上細階'o'.

>

>

> 唔會o既.

>

> LV123

大家都是有智慧的巴士迷，請保持冷靜！不要作出無謂之爭吵！

Article 11: (Request 4}

> 保持冷靜！ (sunnywai@pacific.net.hk) said:

> 大家都是有智慧的巴士迷，請保持冷靜！不

> 要作出無謂之爭吵！

討論氣氛非常之好, 何來有爭吵? fO_o?

Ken

Article 12:

Re: 意外地找到了G33相片

德褔5D (97089033d@polyu.edu.hk) from 158.132.14.19 at Thu May 20 03:46, 1999 said:

> S3BL423 (ckcling@netvigator.com) said:

> 我在某一非巴士網頁中意外地找到了一幅圖片

> 想跟各位分亨

> G33行66M

那位師傅好像穿著 '底衫' 開工, 請問他穿的是不是制服?

旺角地鐵站的英文竟然係 'ARGYLE' !?

5D　德褔花園　往　紅磡　（循環線）

Article 12: (Request 1)

The driver did not wear uniform to drive the bus, because before

1980, drivers in KMB were not restricted to wear uniforms. One of my fan was KMB

driver in 1978 to 1982.

Before 1982? Argyle was the station name. Point out any mistakes, please.

Sierra

Article 12: (Request 2)

當年旺角地鐵站的英文名，的確是 ‘Argyle’ 。

(因為該站位於亞皆老街的地底。)

而當年的巴士總站位置，就位於西洋菜街。

(有錯請指正。)

Article 12: (Request 3}

I think Andy Ng has a better copy. He used to use this picture

as background

y k

Article 12: (Request 4}

> NV58 (tin.wong@kcl.ac.uk) said:

>

> 請問系邊度找出來的? 將相肯定好耐好耐喇播.

> 有無嘉非cat G33照片??????

>

>

>

> Making London simple

Article 13:

Re: 點解而家朝早新記rt.948往長安都收$15.3?

S3N370,GD605 (s3n370@netvigator.com) from 207.176.114.194 at Thu May 20 00:46, 1999 said:

> 小丸子新巴色VA54 (c8002953@net1.hkbu.edu.hk) said:

> As Title:

> 以前中記時代的rt.948朝早往長安都係$12.8!

因為中巴948途經塘尾道及荔枝角道往青衣,

但新巴948的晨早班次則經西九龍快速公路直往青衣.

Article 13: (Request 1)

從 948 增設下午回程服務後, 為統一收費, 造成早平晚貴情況,

故此 948 早上往長安照收 $15.3

Article 13: (Request 2)

> HB610 (sammi59@netvigator.com) said:

> 以下資料摘錄自619 Bus Page網頁.

>

> 空調巴士服務:

>

過 海 路 線:      Km       收 費




>                 18       $12.80




>                 25       $15.30




>                 35       $18.20




>                 47       $20.70




>                 65       $21.40

>

> 948行車里數達24.1Km, 巴士公司收返正價都好應該. 不過, 107,171,970就用左熱狗

> 個收費標準!! 講真, 巴士公司應一視同仁, 107行車里數是21.6Km. 691行車里數只是

> 21.2Km. 但收費呢?? 691仲貴過107號$4.70. 你地話公唔公平?? 690/691/934/935/948

> 930/182收$15.30真係唔應該. 但那邊廂, 960/961卻可以收平左. 960和961行車里數

> 分別是42.5和39.8Km. 收$18.20擺明益屯門.

>

> HB610

You can contribute to the price differences to the different

toll at different tunnels. Such as XHT vs. EHC, and Lion Rock

vs. Tate's Cairn (of Mr. Ngan) in the old days.

For Tuen Mun, I think the main reason for low fares could be

attributed to competition from 'mung mo' residential buses.

100/911R/M1/300 Wong

Article 13: (Request 3}

107 / 171 / 970 收費係歷史問題，當時只有分開過海市區同過海市郊路線，

南區過海線屬後者，而當時未有空調巴士呢回事，所以收費會比過海市區線普通

巴士車費高。

到後來全冷左，兼用左而家個標準先會出現如此情形。

我同意 690 等線收得貴，但佢只要跟法收費，就冇得好反對。反正佢收得貴

都大把人坐。

Article 13: (Request 4}

According to Public Bus Services Ordinance (Ch. 230), 'any bus operator shall not charge any passenger a fare lower than

pre-determined fare except with the prior permission of the Commissioner of Transport.'

So charging a lower fare must be permitted by the Transport Department. And I agree with Mr. Wong's guess about why

TD would permit such an action. (that is to try to compete and finally stop 'mung mo' residential bus operation)

1 more thing to add. The fare schedule published in Gazette No. 22 of 1997 states that, for Cross Harbour Tunnel routes with

journey distance not exceeding 85 km, the fare to be charged would be $ 25.70 .

So a more complete fare charging scale for Cross Harbour Tunnel routes would be:

Journey Fare / $

shorter

than / km

18 12.8

25 15.3

35 18.2

47 20.7

65 21.4

85 25.7

Article 14:

Re: 邊條路線用S3BL過禁區?

Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) from 202.61.238.132 at Thu May 20 09:45, 1999 said:

> Siemens SL10 (matt4127@netteens.net) said:

> 如題,早陣子看電視大陸樓廣告影過來香港,在唔知邊個口岸(好似係羅湖)

> 同香港邊境管制站之間條橋,停左兩架S3BL,但又看不到路線編號,所以咁問.

那兩部車會否剛在大陸完成大修呢 ﹖

(據聞現在有部份九巴是在大陸大修的。)

Article 14: (Request 1)

> Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) said:

>

> 若果係禁區，咁73K應該用過S3BL入禁區

咁 73k 應該係用乜野車?(轉全冷前)

> ~~~Tony(S3M61)~~~

> 祥華巴士路線專輯

Article 14: (Request 2)

> Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) said:

> 平時用雞車兩架(G208,G239)

> 但一到清明重陽，73K即刻用晒大車行，曾經用過ME,S3BL,S3M,

> S3N等車款。

>

> ~~~Tony(S3M61)~~~

> 祥華巴士路線專輯

> is now still 2 bus in 73K?

Article 15:

where are you?

71B (kyc61538@kyc.hkcampus.net) from 203.80.121.69 at Wed May 19 23:38, 1999 said:

i want to find some bus .would you hele me?

(tomorrow before9:30am)

CTB :2700 ,2300 ,2100 ,2101 ,

NWFB:2001 ,ML2 ,SF(NEW COLOUR) ,LV1 ,1401,

KMB :AP1 ,S3BL470 ,S3V30 ,S3V1 ,AV521 ,

AND SOME SPECIL CAR.

Can you help me to find that this specil bus in which route?

Thanks.

71B

Article 15: (Request 1)

Try 260/90C for 2700 (last seen on 260 myself! Just wait at

Central!)

2300 was seen serving on 70.

2100/2101 just wait at the airport lar! You sure won't miss

them!

MiL2 can be found on 914.

SeaFood with new color can be found on 15.

LoVe1 should be serving on 23B

100/911R/M1/300 Wong

Article 15: (Request 2)

屬九記屯廠的唯一一架解凍都城行60號.

ME1相信行71K,AD1相信行14.

唔駛客氣

曾活躍於太和巴士總站的電腦王子

Article 15: (Request 3}

尋日 o係中環廣場廿七樓望落灣碼見到 ML2 剛開出,

原來佢個車頂冇翻油, 仲係中巴奶黃色.

--

車匙!

Article 15: (Request 4}

> Hanvas 漢華 (hanvas@netvigator.com) said:

>

> 呢部車應該係去左總修做大驗，

> 最快都要六月幾先出得返黎 ..

今日見到佢行龍翔道往觀塘方向,

應該係0岩0岩出番黎.

考完會考0既 HB 916

Article 16:

Re: KMB 296A have Trident!

GW5017 (HJ2127@netvigator.com) from 203.80.90.157 at Thu May 20 13:26, 1999 said:

> Tommy! (tommysiu@hknet.com) said:

>

> on 7:45pm,I saw 1 alexander & 1 Duple Metsec Trident on Kwun Tong! The alexander one is go to Sheung Tak side & The Duple one is going to NTK MTR Stn.

> and the alexander trident is HY???? & have a octopus!

> i think this trident is come from rt.300 before!

> does any boardmate saw this?

> 唉!I think the best bus service by KMB is 'ONLY' on Sheung Tak Est!

> 296 have Dennis Dart SLF!!!

> 296A have Dennis Trident!!!

> 296C will have Neoplan Centroliner!!!

> Why so many SLF bus on Sheung Tak???

> Are Sheung Tak Est many Wheelchair people to live in????

>

> my mother also A wheelchair people!

> And I always By 1A SLF Bus with her!

> Tommy!

駛乜o甘緊張,296A成日有Trident行,係98D柯打車喳!

早在去年聖誕節已有Trident做柯打車啦.

將軍澳居民

GW5017

Article 16: (Request 1)

> Hanvas 漢華 (hanvas@netvigator.com) said:

>

> 300 號既躉唔係全部 HV 牌架咩 ? 邊有 HY 牌咁新呀 ?

I think I forgot the the bus number la!

but are the 'HY' Trident have a Octopus machine???

Article 16: (Request 2)

> 3AD46/HJ8388 (s986380@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) said:

> 唉？！呢條村點解會有 7 條巴士行？

> 又幾優待呀？！只可惜296X用舊AL (ETxxxx)行......

> 兼且我在土瓜灣見過吉車296X (唔知係唔係新開的緣故)

Not really so good. If you look in detail what's happened at the end of last year, U will know the reason.

In last year, followed by the completion of many estates (Sheung Tak Est., Kwong Ming Court and another private estate near by), the demand for public traffic increased by several fold (new residents, the relatives and friends of the new residents, the construction and decoration workers). By then, there was only rt.296A to connect them between TKO & Kwun Tong while rt.296 is domestic route only. (at that time rt.296 did not via East Point City)

Another worse situation was resulted from routine of rt.296A, which via Yue Man Sq. and caused/suffered from traffic congestion, (As you may see 3-4 3ADs waiting for alighing and boarding at Yue Man Sq. at that time.) Traffic congestion delayed many departures thus lots of passengers waiting in Sheung Tak but no bus returned to serve them.

I have also suffered from one of the worse cases. A Saturday afternoon I waited 45min for rt.296A at Sheung Tak. Then almost 10 buses returned within 15min (one of them being a original rt.619 scheduled bus). When the first bus arrived the track. The construction and decoration workers rushed into the bus and they kept on to do so although the bus was full.

At that time, the Sai Kung DB member incharge of the Sheung Tak region bargained with KMB & TD for opening more new routes as soon as possible. The result of the bargain was the new rt.296D to Jordan Ferry.

Subsequently, rt.693(peak hour only) and rt.694(peak hour only at the beginning but switched to full day service after a month) were opened. But the situation did not change a lot as more and more residents moved in.

Early 1999, the DB member organized a strike to fight for further improvement in public traffic. the result of this strike was the new rt.296C to Sham Shui Po and the divertion of rt.296 via East Point City.

Reviewing from the history, you will find that the profits of Sheung Tak today is actually an outcome from many hard struggles yesterday.

(Why I know this so much? Because one of my friend in my church lives in Kwong Ming Court and I always go there for gathering.)

Simon_28A

Article 17:

Re: D三軸車用中軸來驅動好定尾軸來驅動好?

100/911R/M1/300 Wong (invespac@netvigator.com) from 205.252.144.88 at Thu May 20 09:21, 1999 said:

> LM3 (angela05@netvigator.com) said:

> 如題....點解現在D新車會用中軸來驅動??

>

> thanks

> LM3,ATR3,333

I once spoke with a driver of CTB (mung mo division), he

said he prefers buses with driving axle in the middle, vs.

the end. He said a middle driving axle provides better handling.

100/911R/M1/300 Wong

Article 17: (Request 1)

> 291(A/B) Siu (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) said:

>

> To reduce turning diameter, so suitable for more roads.

>

> 291(A/B) Siu

其實只要底盤冇中軸(Olympian)或尾軸(Alisa Volvo)輔助轉向, 咁

轉向半徑就會o係兩條尾擔中間, 係唔關邊條擔推動部車事的(有錯

請指正)

Trident用中軸驅動, 只不過係為要迎合佢縱置引擎的設計. 而縱置

引擎的優點, 據去年UITP上康記SALES講, 係可以令波箱用少一對牙,

及底盤可承受更大馬力的引擎. 君不見Trident可用305hp的M11, 而

超奧黏只可用285hp的D10A?

Article 17: (Request 2)

每款巴士都有不同的重心偏移,中軸驅動由於比較接近中心位置,因此中軸驅動起步會是比尾軸有更佳的表現,所以可以容許大馬力的引擎配置(B12, Areo King,.............).

中軸驅動的優點還有很多,最小迴轉半徑會比尾軸更小;容易製造或設置較大面積的平台(America Bus);設置行李箱,把油範水箱全放在車尾,增加散熱effect等.

但有利當然有弊,中軸驅動的巴士的維修成本是比一普通尾軸驅動的巴士高,主要原因是中軸驅動的巴士的差速是由三大二小的齒輪和墊片所組成,用意是碓保當一邊車輪與另一邊車輪的轉運不一樣時,不會出現另一邊車輪向後轉的情況發生,以減少擺尾的幅度.

會考已結束的豐田英二

Icq no.8238165

補充: 如果縱置引擎仍採用尾軸驅動, 尾跨會太長.

Article 17: (Request 3}

會0吾會好容易'luck'尾?

Article 18:

【傳聞】691明日加躉＆【大相廣告】都普鴨

Hanvas 漢華 (hanvas@netvigator.com) from 208.139.110.138 at Wed May 19 21:17, 1999 said:

【傳聞】

　有消息指九巴將於明日開始，

　將路線 691 轉全躉服務，

　煩請「各」板友查証 !　　　　 ← （我又打錯字喇 -_- ）

【大相廣告】

　《香港汽車網絡快線》更新，

　【昔日情懷 Yesterday Memories 】項目更新大相，

　相片為 :

　　九巴都普鴨 (N253) 行 85K 特別車 .

　　（攝於沙田火車站） .

網址 :　http://home.netvigator.com/~hanvas/hkvne/w990519a.html

Article 18: (Request 1)

> 李尋歡 (peterwko@netvigator.com) said:

>

> 如果係真既話, 咁即係最新個批金躉又俾左沙廠啦, 唉!

－　歡兄，想請問６９１關沙田廠乜野事？

東邪

GK 9112

Article 18: (Request 2)

> 李尋歡 (peterwko@netvigator.com) said:

>

> 唔好意思, 係記錯, 應該係九廠至真 - sorry

係九廠定閃廠?

Article 19:

What's the meaning of Route Suggestion?

291(A/B) Siu (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from 202.40.139.40 at Wed May 19 20:45, 1999 said:

There are opinons of LV123 for my route suggestions, and said the Route Suggestion Section is just for setting up new routes, not used for suggestion of route cancellation / rearrangement.

So I want to ask everybody what is the meaning of route suggestion? Just setting up new route? Or include route improvement / cancellation / re-routing also?

I think it is acceptable to post route calncellation / improvement / re-routing in the section, as there is no rule to restrict its use.

Please discuss.

291(A/B) Siu

Article 19: (Request 1)

Why not?

Remember, this is a discussion board, everythingsthat want to suggest/discuss/complaint/report... can be paste out.

Route suggestion is also a form of discussion, everyone can suggest routes or make changes! Even operate new routes...

To LV123: Or maybe you are too serious! I think that make changes of the routes don't have any problem! ^_^???

何必太執著?

No one said that 'ROUTE SUGGESTION' is only for making new route! 唔比係舊路線建議咩？

Sorry! I only give suggestion!

From Cape of Good Hope

icq: 35033777

Article 19: (Request 2)

> 李尋歡 (peterwko@netvigator.com) said:

>

> 以下是由路線建議欄的heading copy 過黎俾你睇, 版主講明係新路線(suggest new routes), 所以我絕對同意LV123君對你的評語.

>

> '路線建議欄是讓板友們自己設計一些新路線給香港使用。所有建議將會保留 15 天。 (本

> 建議欄嚴禁開玩笑建議)

> This is for board members who want to suggest new routes for Hong Kong. All suggestions will be kept 15 days. (No

> joke-type suggestions allowed in this area)'

New routes = new route no. + new routing?

I don't think so!

I think new route means new routing is enough!

So suggestions on change of routings is also acceptable!

Or maybe I think Boardmaster may need to clarify your

intention.

Darren

BL35

Article 19: (Request 3)

I don't mean to pick on the wordings, however, what exactly

does the word 'new' mean?

Some routes with the same route number like before have no

relationship with the old ones. Though I sure would consider

them as 'new' route. (such as 77)

I remember such boardmate once suggested the rearrangement of

E22 & E23, which became reality. Of course, I can't prove

whether or not bus company listened to him. Although he sure

had such idea well before such rearrangement was implemented.

Afterall, since the rearragement was implemented, does that

mean rearrangement of routes is also worth discussing?

100/911R/M1/300 Wong

Article 20:

Re: 城巴新聞稿﹕七十一備增值器城巴表歡迎

CMB VA52 (HN6509) (va52@hkguy.com) from 203.83.85.127 at Wed May 19 19:05, 1999 said:

> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:

> 以下資料是取自城巴網頁 ﹕

>

> 七十一備「八達通」增值器城巴表歡迎

連6, 6A, 6X, 73, 260 也可以用八達通了?

CMB VA52 (HN6509)

Article 20: (Request 1)

> LA11 Shing (b493332@hkstar.com) said:

>

> 對唔住 , 呢五條線都仲未用得

> 八達通住0架 , 因為雙向分段收費0既

> 問題 , 令到呢五條線暫時未用得八達通住 .

但係城記網頁話 ﹕ 現時城巴的車隊已全面接受市民使用「八達通」

付款.

咁都好誤導喎......

CMB VA52 (HN6509)

Article 21:

今日終於見到九巴仔......個廣告

前中巴8號線太守VA51 (parnell@cyberec.com) from 205.252.137.164 at Thu May 20 03:31, 1999 said:

小弟今日看午間劇場,見到地鐵個廣告,小弟因為成日見個廣告,咪唔理囉.然之後接著個廣告係側魚衝地鐵站既樓梯,一個少年人爬樓梯爬到老......

相信大家都知我講咩廣告啦?

小弟終於見到九巴仔喇,不過......好似有抄晒炸蛋人個look之嫌......

核彈人VA51到此一遊

Article 21: (Request 1)

> HB610 (sammi59@netvigator.com) said:

>

> 昨日在尖碼見到個巨型九巴仔, 真係覺得好得意. 唔知九巴會唔會出九巴仔毛公仔呢??

> 九巴真係落重本哂本, 又電視/巴士站廣告......我仲數到有22輛雙層巴士係油左

> 九巴仔廣告呢!

>

> HB610

Article 21: (Request 2)

> siuLam (suilam@netteens.net) said:

>

> 唔知有冇九巴仔個廣告既相欣賞

九巴個仔廣告 .. 唔係 ..

九巴個仔個廣告 .. 唔係 ..

九巴個九巴仔個廣告 .. 嘩 !!

網址 :　http://home.netvigator.com/~hanvas/hkvne/w990520a.html

Article 22:

Re: 早上7:17am 691用躉直擊

S3M253 (jowett@infinite.com.hk) from 202.64.53.68 at Thu May 20 10:41, 1999 said:

> 藍田(北)助理站 (borisyan@hk.super.net) said:

> 今朝小弟在,藍田啟田商場附近，見到一部金躉，初以為是

> 690，但諗諗下又唔係九記時間，一睇尾牌，原來是691，

> 那班車客量不算多，三十多人，我靜係睇到尾同則面，是

> 一部HVxxxx躉，報告完畢！

>

> ‧ 其實我係星期一已經有D 300 Trident行1A喇，係一、兩部HV牌有banner

> 、同八仔機的金躉！

>

>

>

> 今日鋤假的Bory23

> 藍田(北)助理站長告假一天

最小看到三部HV的亞記躉,一部JB的都普躉

Article 22: (Request 1)

小弟想知道691九巴時間表. 請問有無板友有時間表呢??

謝謝幫忙!

HB610

Article 23:

Re: To those typing foul languages here

野比大雄 (busstop@netvigator.com) from 207.176.116.149 at Wed May 19 19:48, 1999 said:

> 291(A/B) Siu (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) said:

> I am extremely angry to see opinions with foul languages for my 2 route suggegstions:

>

> Southern Grand Bus Routes Rearrangement

> Change 68A to via Tai Lam Tunnel

>

> Please DO NOT type foul language of any kind or anything with close meaning to any foul languages here, or you would have your account deleted forever!!

>

> 291(A/B) Siu

亮覺族兄，很明顯是同一人所為。

您向板主先生投訴吧，在這裏貼沒用的。

Article 23: (Request 1)

I agree with NOBITA! If you want any complaints, the efficient way is directly e-mail to boardmaster.

I've done it before and boardmaster do it very efficient.

Mr.SLK, may you visit my web and give me some opinions?

http://members.xoom.com/ANCT

The photo will add every day!

From The Cape of Good Hope (C.G.H)

icq: 35033777

Support you forever ^.^

Article 24:

Re: Old pages

HB610 (sammi59@netvigator.com) from 168.70.80.242 at Wed May 19 19:15, 1999 said:

> sierra (mchau@coventry.ac.uk) said:

> Can sb state the web site for finding

> out the old discuccion board due to the details were erased

> suddenly. Thank you!!!!!!

>

> Sierra

呢位哥哥. 羅兄已經出左標題了, 請留意清楚才貼文, 以免浪費HKBDB資源.

請按此

HB610

Article 24: (Request 1)

Where is it? I can,t see anything after press your icon!!

Article 25:

Re: Note: Foul language in opinion again!!

Princess Serenity (tangeric@netvigator.com) from 208.167.241.63 at Wed May 19 21:01, 1999 said:

> 291(A/B) Siu (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) said:

> Notice:

>

> There is a boardmate giving opinion on my suggestion of 'Southern Grand Rearrangement' with foul language again!

>

> Can Ken Fung suspend his account for this, please?

>

> 291(A/B) Siu, who is extremely angry to see some boardmates writing foul languages in poinions for my route suggestions (also others)

D人比0分唔比理由,

寫粗口,

明顯係對人不對事!

Article 25: (Request 1)

可能與巴士離題，但牽涉到板友爭拗，所以講少少意見。

Bullshit根據各大字典解釋，係：nonsense, foolish and exaggerated talk

的slang（俚語），但當然有鄙視成份的用字。以現時電檢制度，此

詞語可在IIA（兒童不宜）以上影片出現，而在電視，亦可在PG節目

中出現。粗俗程度只屬一般。

但當然，應否在呢個板出現則見仁見智了，若板主認為過份，當然

有權力刪除啦！

Article 26:

Re: 問巴士模型資料

Ronald (ronald_to@laser.zeronet.org.hk) from 158.182.1.35 at Wed May 19 19:07, 1999 said:

> BR4474 (c6091596@comp.polyu.edu.hk) said:

>

> 麻煩各位仁兄, 煩請解答以下問題:

>

> 嶼巴模型 stock no. 及數量

Stock No. 42814

香港版三千,英國版二千

> 城巴 642 數量

六千

> 城巴 2100 stock no. 及數量

Stock No. 44504

六千

> 端午巴士詳情

約六月中 (綜合香港巴士模型網頁及數間巴士模型店之消息所得)

Ronald

Article 26: (Request 1)

D890----18004

NLB-----42814,HK數量3000,UK2000

642-----6000

2100----44504.數量6000

Article 27:

Re: 城巴水如河湧

CMB VA52 (HN6509) (va52@hkguy.com) from 203.83.85.127 at Wed May 19 19:02, 1999 said:

> 城城 (poonsam@hknet.com) said:

> 今早小弟乘坐0712由馬鞍山開出

> 之城巴路線681(車號:357)往中環返工

> 小弟當時坐在樓上小睡片刻, 突然間覺

> 得腳下一涼, 發覺成隻鞋都係水, 再看

> 清楚, 發覺車身旁邊既去水坑竟然充滿

> 積水, 每當煞車時, 就產生波浪效應, 成

> 個浪咁沖埋黎.....................結果當然成鞋水啦!!

> 最近城巴D服務似乎有點兒那過.....點解???

城巴車廂好像沒有去水孔的.

很可能之前有人在車廂嘔過, 司機用水沖洗後未及拖走污水...

CMB VA52 (HN6509)

Article 27: (Request 1)

You are right. All new NWFB buses also do not have water drains in upper decks.

291(A/B) Siu

Article 28:

Re: 呢架係咪 722 既躉呢?

VA36 (kchojbl@school.net.hk) from 158.132.14.19 at Thu May 20 13:06, 1999 said:

> Ken Fung (kenf@hkstar.com) said:

> 睇運輸處既 webcam (12:41pm) 於北角見到以下景象:

>

>

>

> 唔知係 722 躉丫, 定係其中一架 112 收車呢? :P

112 新巴時段由北角開係 13:00 ，所以冇乜理由係 112 。而 722 前幾日都

間唔中有 Trident （兩款殼都有），所以如果唔係 18 塞車踢車 o既話（

又係有乜可能），呢架九成九係 722 。

P.S. 個 Board 鐘快成六分鐘？

Article 29:

錦田場買0野適可而止!!

Bory23, FC6037 (borisyan@hk.super.net) from 205.252.144.9 at Thu May 20 10:58, 1999 said:

我不反對大家到錦田場買「零件」，但最好適可而止，

雖然吸引，但叫我花幾百元買所謂珍貴物品，是否物

有所值呢？

小弟都有收藏一些「零件」(圓電鐘、LX燈殼、牌布、

水牌-如英國款Dart SLF等， ‧ 聲明，並非老鼠貨，有

的是英國物品)，深知擁有是高興非常，但當你們玩厭

這些玩具又點呢？如果你門話從保存「巴士文物」出

發，是否雖要一窩「瘋」去收藏呢？莫非人人也要開

博物館？從一些「保值派」香港人慨念去諗，人人都

有同樣物品會升值嗎？

不是叫你們完存不買，是不要麻木去買，瘋狂去搶購

，其實是助長他們謀暴利，記得以前錦田場「交易」

風氣未盛時，零件價錢未有咁高(以前都好平)，甚至

拆雞年代屠夫送膠牌都試過我，可知他們起初並非想

謀利，但有興趣的人越多，他們覺得有利可圖，先有

現在情況發生，愆生出來的問題更是無知小朋友因貪

念而偷野，是我不想見到的。不一定擁有零件先叫「

懷緬過去」，最重要係那分感情，一張相、一次遊河，

甚至一面之緣，都可得到那份回憶，我不是教訓任何

人，亦無資格添，只是希望各位能反思，使大家不駛

玩物喪志！！

今日鋤假的Bory23

藍田(北)助理站長告假一天

Article 29: (Request 1)

成長有不同歷程，巴士迷亦如是。小弟年少時也試過費寢忘餐地沈迷

巴士，亦曾花錢買過些物件來收藏。只可以說，年少時無憂無慮，以

當時的心智，買的時候很有滿足感，相信閣下在買下眾多的收藏品時

也有這種感覺。

但當人長大，奔波勞碌，很多其他的事要兼顧，想起以前就會覺得自

己好傻。

但好多野係要自己經歷過先至有所體會既...

所以說他們是對是錯，見人見智啦...

保存左兩個圓寶檸檬燈罩的

WingKit

Article 30:

Re: 緊急尋找(優之良品)廣告新巴

eric (bching@hk.super.net) from 202.64.15.254 at Thu May 20 10:37, 1999 said:

> N.W.F.B.VA14 (adwel272@hkstar.com) said:

> 小弟這幾天在北角112號巴士總站等部(優之良品)廣告新巴回總站,但

> 都不見他的影蹤,他是否抽離了112號,還是這部車入了廠修理?有沒有

> 板友答覆倒我的問題.

i think still in 112

Article 31:

Re: 【查詢】82x轉全冷日期

HB610 (sammi59@netvigator.com) from 168.70.80.1 at Thu May 20 10:15, 1999 said:

> Hanvas 漢華 (hanvas@netvigator.com) said:

> 【查詢】

> 　 82x 轉全冷日期 ?

1997年9月10日.

HB610

Article 32:

Re: 新巴躉新廣告+新巴終於用髹掃掃佢D Trident

Bory23, FC6037 (borisyan@hk.super.net) from 205.252.144.88 at Thu May 20 09:20, 1999 said:

> 輝仔 (c5124176@comp.polyu.edu.hk) said:

> 今朝見到1017上了關鍵旅遊全身廣告. 車頭用綠色, 車新又橙又青.

> 不過並沒有貼貼紙打底, 又不是用噴油, 而係好似D舊DA/VA咁直接

> 用髹掃髹上去.

>

> 可能都行了大半年了, 新巴開始捨得髹佢D新巴士了.

正常o丫，因為噴油成本較貴(又要額壓縮器、又噴槍)，況且九記、以前中記

都係多用髹掃髹上去，平嘛!

Bory23, FC6037

Article 33:

On 260

Cityflyer A23 (cpitech@netvigator.com) from 205.252.144.88 at Thu May 20 09:10, 1999 said:

> 271 (josephk@ctimail.com) said:

> today i want to take photo (citybus2700)?

> can i help me to find it whick route have (2700)?

>

> thanks

Yesterday around 18.30 I saw 2700 on #260.

Article 34:

Behaviours of fans, Give your opinions!

sierra (mchau@coventry.ac.uk) from 194.66.33.84 at Thu May 20 05:15, 1999 said:

Today I received a reply mail from H* **1. The words contain a bit of offensive.

The board is used for asking questions not for condemning fans.

The contents was 'Don't waste the resourses of the board! The question

was answered by XXX!' Even though somebody was gone wrong, but, is it essential to

say such words. Fans don't mind should nobody replying. How do you think if you are

being condemned by the same way?? Do you think you were not wasting the resoures that

to print such words to reply a questions?? So next time , behave yourself.

I print that essay is not arguing, I want to say fans have their right to ask any questions

besides joking. Can anybody gives your opinions?

sierra

Article 34: (Request 1)

Well I did not find any problem on HB610's speech (At least not an impolite one, right? :) ). At some point

I do agree what he's said. You know, sometimes it is not very nice to put a thread concerning about an aspect

which is just covered by other boardmates. So it would be better to take a few minutes to scan through the title

of each thread (just the title only) before posting your article (You know, it's not cheap for Ken to host this

board), in order to prevent overlapping between articles. Alright?

NV58

Making London simple

Article 35:

Re: 2500去了何處 ?

龍神丸 (clement@hkplanet.com) from 158.132.14.19 at Thu May 20 03:29, 1999 said:

> EggHo (howaikin@ctimail.com) said:

> Hi !! 大家好嗎, 想請問2500現行駛那條路線,

> 8X 還是 90C ? 另外其他雙層MAN到港未 ?

>

> 請指教, 謝謝 !!

今日(19/05/1999)還在5B.

---

讀緊既課程既編號剛好係2500既

龍神丸

Article 36:

Re: Any Bus Model must be release soon???

Ronald (ronald_to@laser.zeronet.org.hk) from 158.182.1.38 at Thu May 20 04:43, 1999 said:

> SiuLam (suilam@netteens.net) said:

You may go to Hong Kong Bus Model

http://come.to/hkbm

to see what you want....

They are usually with some news which model shop didn't know.

:P

Ronald

Article 37:

Re: 錦田故事

G274 (bching@hk.super.net) from 202.64.15.254 at Thu May 20 10:26, 1999 said:

> Marshall CX1 (marcy001@netvigator.com) said:

> 我知道一班友仔(長毛的黨羽)成日入去錦田場,並協助

> 內面的工人賣o野,佢地當然唔會成日出現,不過見到你係巴

> 士迷的話你個荷包一定被人砍到一頸血.

>

> 所以有人買o野買到咁貴就係咁解啦.

>

> is it need to call police?

> CX1

Article 38:

Re: History of 33, 33A, 33B, 33C AND 34

y k shum (ykshum@mit.edu) from 18.47.0.58 at Thu May 20 02:46, 1999 said:

> sierra (mchau@coventry.ac.uk) said:

> PLEASE state:

> 1, bus type, 2, year of set up/canceled.

> As detail as possible! Thank you!!!!!

rt. 33

I think it started in the early 1970's when the so called

'New Zone' housing project was completed. According to

Automobile mag., Seddon Pennie (AR76xx) were first dispatched

to this route. When I moved to Tsuen Wan in 1975, it was ran

by Daimler E. Soon after (76 or 77?), Fleetline were used,

until I left in 1985.

rt. 34

In 1975, Seddon Pennie

Early 1980's to 1985 and on: Albion 41 (AR77xx)

Those days it terminated at Tsuen Wan West (so called 9.5 miles)

y k

Article 39:

Re: 徵求:龍運CX Trident相

Rick(CZ6686) (chopchoi@hknet.com) from 202.67.164.158 at Wed May 19 17:44, 1999 said:

> SiuLam (suilam@netteens.net) said:

> 小弟只作製作紙巴士之用,希望各位可借小弟一用.Thankyou

> 如可以的話send Email 俾我0拉.

我個網(巴士資訊網)樣樣都有少少...

只要入到主頁後再入相集便可。

希望可以幫到您。

Rick

Article 40:

(ad)291(A/B) Siu's Transport Forum

291(A/B) siu (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from 202.40.139.40 at Thu May 20 12:50, 1999 said:

291(A/B) Siu's Transport Forum has a lot of articles good for discussion, and not just buses. There are some articles like railways, ferries to discuss.

Enjoy discussion there tonight after the closing of HKBDB.

291(A/B) Siu

Article 41:

新記rt.14一問?

小丸子新巴色VA54 (c8002953@net1.hkbu.edu.hk) from 158.182.1.38 at Thu May 20 12:12, 1999 said:

請問,平日早上新記rt.14係米有班LV行走呢?

請盡快俾答案我!

THX!

絕對支持特區炒飯減至20萬個新移民來港的.......

VA54 HN8897

~V~

Article 42:

【大相廣告】九巴個九巴仔個廣告..巨龍大相

香港汽車網絡快線 (hanvas@netvigator.com) from 208.167.228.237 at Thu May 20 11:51, 1999 said:

【大相廣告】九巴個九巴仔個廣告 .. 巨龍大相

　　《香港汽車網絡快線》加入新一張大相 :

　　　九巴個仔廣告 .. 唔係 ..

　　　九巴個仔個廣告 .. 唔係 ..

　　　九巴個九巴仔個廣告 .. 嘩 !!

　　網址 :　http://home.netvigator.com/~hanvas/hkvne/w990520a.html

歡迎參觀 .

Article 43:

Is this appopriate?

291(A/B) Siu (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from 202.40.139.40 at Thu May 20 11:40, 1999 said:

There is such opinion on my route suggestion of Changing 68A to via Tai Lam Tunnel:

虎地冇位停啦

白痴低能蕭亮覺,快d打佢返泰國

I think this is not appopriate at all, and is a means of personal attack.

Do you think so?

291(A/B) Siu

Article 44:

【網頁廣告】(九巴)70討論區

Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) from 168.70.94.198 at Thu May 20 09:55, 1999 said:

見其他板友都響BDB度賣討論區網頁，本人亦不妨都係賣下D討論

區網頁廣告先:

(因為BDB暫停服務)

(九巴)70討論區

http://w3.to/70bdb

http://www.insidetheweb.com/mbs.cgi/mb114259

討論區內歡迎各位討論有關於香港同世界各地既巴士事宜，形式

同香港巴士討論區冇大分別。最唔同既係該板不設任何會員制度，

自由度都比較大。

歡迎到此貼文

~~~Tony(S3M61)~~~

祥華巴士路線專輯

Article 45:

[廣告]Cyber-X 公共交通及運輸新聞組

大腦電波 (leungweb@cyber-x.org) from 168.70.249.152 at Thu May 20 09:40, 1999 said:

Cyber-X 公共交通及運輸新聞組已經成立,歡迎各位在此討論巴士及其他公共交通

工具.

地址:

news://news.cyber-x.org/cyber-x.transport

本組特色:

1. 貼文無需密碼,免除麻煩.

2. 24小時有版主監察,就算該組版主不在,亦有其他組別版主及Cyber-X 新聞組

委員會委員監察,刪除違反版規的文章,並謝絕罵戰.

3. 用法與使用E-MAIL一樣,Netscape及IE均能使用.

Article 46:

[廣告]線網縱橫 300號尾日相及九巴296X單張

3AD46/HJ8388 (s986380@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) from 137.189.4.4 at Thu May 20 01:00, 1999 said:

線網縱橫本週大相為最尾一天的 300 號 (HV6943 及 HV6857)

要看可到 http://hello.to/transport

九巴 296X 單張備索

第一版

 第二版

都唔知 296X 開到 7-10 分鐘咁密做乜！

Article 47:

KMB hotline

Yellow Bus(TSW) (busybees@hk.super.net) from 202.64.6.139 at Thu May 20 01:02, 1999 said:

the enquiry of lantau route, airport routes and kcr feeder routes has been changed to

'please input the no. of route you desired, then press the # key'

not choosing 1,2,3....... to choose the designated route

but i think it is under tests because it can only work when there is an announcement of 'the customer service officers are off.......'

please tell if anyone has more details about this

thank you very much

Article 48:

[再問]歷史

S3N370,GD605 (s3n370@netvigator.com) from 207.176.114.90 at Thu May 20 09:42, 1999 said:

問城巴90B 及新巴91, 94, 94X 的歷史.

Article 49:

今日58P尾車無故失蹤

金魚 (n960@netvigator.com) from 168.70.71.132 at Wed May 19 22:43, 1999 said:

今日我2000在葵芳村等58P返良景(我係唔會坐58M,因為

飛3個站同埋總站比較近我家)

但係我等到2035都唔見有58P到,58P尾車開2030.

昨天我在同一位置等車,2015就有58P到站,咁今日班尾車

去左邊?? ^.~??

住田景的金魚字

Article 50:

Re: Information on LT10/LTA10 Engine

Simon_28A (simon-clt@i-cable.com) from 203.83.89.38 at Wed May 19 22:38, 1999 said:

Yesterday I answered somebody on the captioned question. And I promised to provide further information once available. Here it is:

L10 L series engine (10 litre class)

LT10 L10 w/turbocharger

LTA10 L10 w/turbocharger & air intercooler

Engine Fuelpump Max Hp @ rpm Vehicles used

------ -------- ------------ -------------

LT10-B S721A 176-184@1900 M58-60

LT10-B S726A 245-255@2100 S3BL (DY/DZ), AL1

LT10-B S788 239-249@1950 S3N51-55, S3N222-270**

LT10-B S789 245-255@2100 S3BL***

LT10-B SC36 240-250@1900 S3BL***

LT10-B SC88 240-250@1900 AL***

LT10-B SD10 240-250@1900 AL***

LTA10-B SD27 274-288@1900 AD2-21 & more****

LTA10-A SD30 276-288@1900* S3M214-253, M81-88

Notes:

* This is the enging rating only. It is said the engine powers of S3M214-253 are 282Hp

** The engine power listed on the specification plates on S3N51-55 & S3N222-270 are 176kW (ie 176/0.746=235.9Hp)

*** There is no detailed information stating the batch(es) that is/are using this type of engines.

**** Since I did not look in detail for the rest of ADs, I cannot tell which batch(es) after AD2-21 that is/are using this type of engines.

Power conversion: 1Hp = 746W or 0.746kW

Simon_28A

Article 51:

【廣告】特區交通分類廣告

Nicholas Louie (nichlas@netvigator.com) from 208.167.247.19 at Wed May 19 22:29, 1999 said:

路線分類

------------------------------------------------------------

為響應路線296X的開行，特區交通已加入296X資料。同日，馬場線802、811

及東隧路線691的資料已加入。

進入特區交通

－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－

討論分類

------------------------------------------------------------

由於本板由21日起停板數天，特區交通討論區由即日起全天候開放

所有板友非板友均可在該處討論。

------------------------------------------------------------

另由即日起特區交通新討論點－特區交通壞車報告正式開放

如果各位在每日一跪結束後想提供壞／撞巴資料，就可以在該處刊登

－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－

Nicholas Louie

ICQ UIN:15306525

Article 52:

[網頁緊急通告]路線238X巴士網頁

野比大雄 (busstop@netvigator.com) from 207.176.116.149 at Wed May 19 20:38, 1999 said:

本網頁於１９９９年５月１９日緊急更新，內容為「荃灣巴士網絡」
的改版試驗。

由於大考臨近，本人在七月前不會對網頁作出任何更新。而七月後本
網頁將維持有限度服務。

對於曾請求加入連結的網主，本人感到非常抱歉，因本人未能抽空更
新「海濱轉網站」。本人希望能在七月更新時加入連結。

特此通告

路線 238X 巴士網頁網主

野比大雄　啟

本網頁網址：

http://netvigator.com/~busstop/238X.html 或

http://i.am/238x

Article 53:

原來銀行都有巴士物品出喎

龍神丸 (clement@hkplanet.com) from 203.85.16.119 at Wed May 19 19:57, 1999 said:

今天去銀行領取禮品,

見到一水晶物品, 一看之下...

嘩...巴士呀!

仲係雙層亞記ALX500呀!

車尾有齊紅燈添...

但一看所需積分:

嘩...數千+現金$880或數十萬積分

噢~

---

龍神丸

Article 54:

問那處可以有新界前專利巴士資料

BR4474 (c6091596@comp.polyu.edu.hk) from 158.132.14.19 at Wed May 19 19:48, 1999 said:

各位仁兄,

請問那位人仕或那個網頁可以知道新界的廢車場, 或者其他私人

車場的巴士資料, 例如那些巴士仍在, 那些被 TONG 等等

Article 55:

What's going happen + New 870 BusGallery

CTB 870 (il2239@netvigator.com) from 208.151.66.248 at Wed May 19 18:18, 1999 said:

What's happen on this page?

So frighten!!!

News:

A new gallery is set up since today!

ALX 200, ALX 300, Benz'68M'.......

Gallery Link: http://members.xoom.com/ANCT/bus.htm

'EVERY DAY UPDATE'!

From CTB 870: icq: 35033777

Article 56:

緊急通告﹕本板出事前最後一篇文

Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) from 202.61.238.138 at Wed May 19 18:05, 1999 said:

以下是本板index file出事前的最後一篇文 ﹕

http://www.webcomm.com.hk/cgi-bin/hkbdb/read.cgi?t=27802-1

Article 57:

問點樣整用完即棄舞台用道具巴士 ?

無得重新開始的LV 163 (kwyeung@school.net.hk) from 202.45.176.5 at Wed May 19 20:54, 1999 said:

我學校有過English Festival，我地F.4要做個Commercial Time

即係賣廣告(VA 51 唔該幫  手解釋),我個班話要係架巴士度賣廣

告,可憐的我.. 就要整部巴士(With sound)出來,唔該比D意見我。

** Please look at down there (Reply Area) to see the correct format. **

初部構思:

5M 長

1.5M 高

1M 闊

'府'視圖

=========================================

* @ @ @ @ @ @ @

@ @ @ @ @ @ @

* - 司機位

@ - 乘客位

正視圖

=========================================

=========================================

| | | | | |

| | | | | |

=========================================

| |

| |

=========================================

(前面加15張椅,司機位加張  擺  盤,另加地拖波棍一枝)

材料

除家俱外,全部用硬卡紙(用完即棄,therefore 要好平),

Support with 棍

聲音:

N.W.F.B. Trident sound or

Citybus Olympain

(Record with MD)

Ideas please send to kwyeung@school.net.hk or ICQ:4227223

最好唔好Post係度,Since就快搬 server ....

Article 58:

Re: 新巴新聞稿﹕新巴路線63增設空調服務

叻霸佳 (letchan@netvigator.com) from 205.252.144.88 at Wed May 19 18:37, 1999 said:

> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:

> 以下資料是取自新巴網頁 ﹕

>

> 新巴路線63增設空調服務

如果係開單層的話，我會覺得新巴今次有0的好心做壞事。

如果攪到有人冇車坐，咁就真係唔知好嬲定好笑。

Article 59:

What is the differences between ...?

M69 (lsming@ctimail.com) from 203.80.116.86 at Wed May 19 17:57, 1999 said:

What is the differences between S3bl, s3n, s3m, s3v?

and also M, BL, DM?

Is Trident has the types smaller than the other buses?

What is the breaking system of Dennis buses, why so unstable?

and also, Leyland Buses, why so noise?

MCW's one, then?

Has Volvo change the breaking system of Olympian after buying Leyland Co.?

Finally, Can any one tell me the detail about MCW Metrobus?

So many questions, sorry for that

and Thanks!

M69 :)

Article 60:

LF和SF賣`什麼廣告和行走什麼路線

wong01@netteens.net (wong01@netteens.net) from 168.70.92.63 at Wed May 19 17:55, 1999 said:

SF3至SF10 SF13 SF14 SF16 SF19至SF21 SF24 SF25 SF30 SF31是否

全部行15 15B的山頂路線掛牌車外,還有賣什麼廣告資料?

LF18 21 26 27 46 48 107 109 110 111 113 115至118 121 123 125

126 239 243 249 252 255至258 260 264 272 278 303 304是否全部行什麼掛牌車外,還有賣什麼廣告資料嗎?

Article 61:

Someone bomb my e-mail account

Scorpio (si439741@icard.hkstar.com) from 205.252.144.90 at Wed May 19 17:40, 1999 said:

a E-mail of 'lauivy@hkabc.net' - that is the account of LA22, the webmaster of Doraemon's bus -sent me some bombs with

a name 'Penis' with about 1000 of this words for 50 messages in my Inbox, sent by him.

His enemies such as DA54, Peter Yam....etc if you also be bombed by him, pleasse e-mail to lmc02138@lmc.hkcampus.net

Anyone whose Inbox is bombed by him, please e-mail to me.

Anyone who haven't bombed by him yet:

Please install the Anti-E-mail bomb software in your computer to keep your computer and your eyes safe

Scorpio(he bombed my account with 250 e-mails, bad guy! Cut his account la Ken..-_-)

Article 62:

[問]巴士線

S3N370,GD605 (s3n370@netvigator.com) from 202.64.6.248 at Wed May 19 17:26, 1999 said:

問新巴,91, 94及94X的歷史

S3N370,GD605

Article 63:

about S3N92

Trident (pttsang@hkschool.net) from 203.80.197.166 at Wed May 19 17:09, 1999 said:

Can anbody tell me something about this bus..................such as why it need to rebody and the car no. of this bus now etc.......also capacity and any transmission and engine change? thanks for asking

Article 64:

Re: 壞車

LM3,ATR3,333 (angela05@netvigator.com) from 203.80.109.192 at Thu May 20 14:10, 1999 said:

> Automatic (a3061980@netvigator.com) said:

> today took KMB 47x S3BNXXXX (FX xxxx)(sorry,唔記

> 得車牌),出左城隧到到新市城架車壞左,

> 初頭司機乜都冇講,淨係熄車,到轉車時見到架47x 車尾黑晒!!!

> 我坐係架車到唔覺有唔妥只係o係出左隧道.架車係紅綠燈轉入新城市

> 有隔離o既私家車司機同司機講野......

> 同埋轉車果架唔係47x掛牌車,係L廠 S3BM (EG XXXX)..

> (47x 仲有好多呢類車喎...咁??)

點解唔寫在'每日一跪 '

P.S.之前板主問過取唔取消'每日一跪 ',如果真的取消後,

但D人好似這篇寫在主頁,又有咩符??

LM3

Article 65:

(Ad) Paper Bus Connection

Transit Rider in SF (achow@email.sjsu.edu) from 207.92.172.107 at Thu May 20 14:13, 1999 said:

This is the link to the new Paper Bus Connection.

Now Features KMB AEC Regent and Albion EVK41XL.

http://members.xoom.com/ntechcentral/pbc/

Article 66:

九記超級富豪奧黏現於屯裝

電腦王子 (shwong@chevalier.net) from 202.77.25.135 at Thu May 20 13:30, 1999 said:

小弟剛見到九記最新型號巴士超級富豪奧黏停泊於80廠,佢全身

香檳色,並未有屬廠,車身編號及車牌,車頭清楚見到有

’VOLVO’ 及 ’Alexander’ 字樣,車軸的確與AV及

3AV相似,之後俾架未出牌  都普躉泊入去,仲見到得到重生 

火龍泊埋一邊,而82廠1樓見一架好似前九記行238系

 ’ 日野 ’,掛有最早期凍都城,AD1及AL1都有  空調牌,

請問知否佢係乜車?現位於82廠入口1樓(約於入口右面

第1棵樹對上)

另想問車匙兄及安仔兄有無ICQ可供聯絡?請電郵我,唔該.

電腦王子

ICQ:1885-7757

Article 67:

尋車!

??? (h9470000@hkusua.hku.hk) from 202.40.141.30 at Thu May 20 13:55, 1999 said:

請問城巴2294在那裡?

Article 68:

【網頁廣告】60X,E33,962特寫、九巴Trident、A52,914傳單

60X巴士網站 (chungtm@netteens.net) from 205.252.144.176 at Wed May 19 16:15, 1999 said:

本人經過漫長的會考日子,暫停更新一段時間,

現在本人網頁經已更新,內容包括：

(I)60X特寫加入新相六張

-1.S3N227,廉政廿五年

-2.AV66,愛華AV組合

-3.AV412,和記新幹線

-4.AV526(K)(快餐豪),Play smart MasterCard

-5.AL39,愛華MD

-6.3AD66(S),活希兒

(II)E33特寫加入新相一張

-1.HT9480,STAR ALLIANCE

(III)962特寫中相片重新掃描並加入新相,包括

-474,679(T-banner在左邊車身),684,2215,2235等

(IV)九巴Trident分頁加入十三張新相

-九巴兩張

-龍運九張,其中一張取自E33特寫

-未出牌兩張,包括ATR101

(V)路線傳單加入

-A52,914

--------------------------------------------------

另本網頁快將一週年,特將部分版面更新,包括：

(1)主頁

(2)部分分頁改名

(3)新增兩頁分頁

--------------------------------------------------

詳細更新項目可參閱此處

 歡迎參觀及給予意見！

60X BusPage網主

屯兵

Article 69:

Re: What is the different between 70/270A

GZ5818 (kytse1@netvigator.com) from 168.70.68.71 at Thu May 20 18:23, 1999 said:

> KIT (williamc@tsl.net.hk) said:

>

> I want to know what is this different

> between 70/270A.

>

> And why many people want 270A upgrade to

> full day service?

>

> KIT

70 行經:

(北區) 上水市,天平村,聯和墟,祥華,大窩西支路

(大埔) 太和,大埔墟,運頭塘村

大埔公路

(沙田) 禾輋,沙角

九龍區

270A 行經:

(北區) 上水市,嘉福,華明,牽晴間

不停站至九龍

70 , 270A 九龍區行程相若.(70 往佐敦行上海街)

270A 往返九龍快捷, 粉嶺至九龍只三十多分鐘.

GZ5818/Tonio Tse

Article 69: (Request 1)

70 行山路，經大埔、沙田。

270A 行快速公路，直出九龍。

而家 D 乘客 prefer 點對點路線嘛。

Article 70:

Re: 新九rt.948應否摺埋?

Peggy Lau VA 11 (nakata-chih-ping@i-cable.com) from 203.83.82.148 at Thu May 20 17:28, 1999 said:

> 小丸子新巴色VA54 (c8002953@net1.hkbu.edu.hk) said:

> As title:

>

>

> 自地龍青衣線通車後,rt.948客量大受打擊,而且之前

> 前中記又不肯把rt.948改全日行走!而家的新九rt.948

> 改全日服務等於0.......,所以rt.948應該摺.......

>

>

> 係青衣一帶開番條地龍接駁巴士線取代rt.948.

>

>

>

>

> 對新九rt.948失望的.....

> VA54 HN8897

現時948線客量不俗,平均都有8-9成滿

Article 70: (Request 1)

點樣大受打擊? 可唔可以具體講下?

唔行全日服務就要摺 ?

咁 307 要唔要摺? 81P 要唔要摺? 93A 要唔要摺?

262 要唔要摺? 40P 要唔要摺?

Article 70: (Request 2)

I don't think so!Alougth some passengers change to by MTR--

Tung Chung Line,but many passengers by Rt.948 again(including mine.)Also Rt.948 is very useful,because Live in

Tsing Yi(south) residents(e.g.Greenfiled garden,Cheung Hong and Cheung Ching Estate)they very need Rt.948,they don't like take Rt.249M to Tsing Yi AR Station and exhange the MTR,it's very watse time.and then each 948 buses have about

80--100 passengers(sometimes passengers need stand in the bus to Central) ,and the return journey to Tsing Yi is very more passengers(about 60-70 passengers from mondays to fridays)

so I think Rt.948 cannot cancelled!!!

Article 70: (Request 3)

I don't think so!Alougth some passengers change to by MTR--

Tung Chung Line,but many passengers by Rt.948 again(including mine.)Also Rt.948 is very useful,because Live in

Tsing Yi(south) residents(e.g.Greenfiled garden,Cheung Hong and Cheung Ching Estate)they very need Rt.948,they don't like take Rt.249M to Tsing Yi AR Station and exhange the MTR,it's very watse time.and then each 948 buses have about

80--100 passengers(sometimes passengers need stand in the bus to Central) ,and the return journey to Tsing Yi is very more passengers(about 60-70 passengers from mondays to fridays)

so I think Rt.948 cannot cancelled!!!

Article 70: (Request 4)

> 291(A/B) Siu (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) said:

>

> Or change the terminus of 948, so it starts from Cheung Heng, then via Ysing Yi South, together with reduced fare ($12-13), so to make more passengers taking it & no need to compete directly with MTR.

>

> 291(A/B) Siu

948 不能改由長亨開, 現時948線乘客大部分係來自翠怡及涌美路一帶

Article 70: (Request 5)

> 3AD46/HJ8388 (s986380@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) said:

>

> 如果係長亨開再經涌美路？

但又不能服務翠怡,長康,長青及美景wor

Article 70: (Request 6)

唉.......林兄, 你住將軍澳梗係唔知機鐵通車對948有重大影響啦!以前348一改行

西隧做948. 由原本2班車加至4班車都唔夠做. 一個月之內, 九/中巴不斷加班 ,加

至今時今日長安開6班車, 翠怡開4班空車. 根本那時候長安開既車, 上到涌美路

你想搵個位都難, 上到青康路仲唔駛旨意有得上車.所以要特別加開翠怡(青衣鄉事

會路)空車就係咁解. 雖然是收$15.30. 但好似你昨日話齌, 收得貴都有大把人坐.

因948提供直通服務, 而且夠快.

豈料機鐵通車, 948客源最大影響就係長安/發. 因青衣站在長安/發側邊. 因機鐵仲

快過948出中環, 而且收費仲平過948. 換轉係你都去坐機鐵啦! 至於第二主要客源

涌美路, 則有少少影響. 涌美路客源仲保得住個原因, 係948提供直通服務, 而且

你在涌美路坐249M轉機鐵所花O既時間和金錢也不見得好過948. 所以涌美路仲有得

做就係咁解.

小弟住青衣, 當然唔想948摺啦! 但事實上仍有開兩味O既必要!! 至於轉全日, 小弟

唔支持. 因為用最老土講句: 客量唔足以支持轉全日. 除非:

1)青衣無機鐵.

2)948是新巴獨營.

3)銅鑼灣有坑.

安仔(HB610)

Article 71:

我的意見

Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) from 168.70.94.227 at Thu May 20 17:31, 1999 said:

> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:

> 話說在300線被取消之後，運吉署在中環區內有以下的發現 ﹕

>

> 1. 由於少了十五部行走300線的巴士，該區的交通情況已經得到重

> 大改善 …

>

> 2. 由於多了十五部巴士行走其他途經中環的隧道線，乘客候車的時

> 間已經大大減少 …

>

> 3. 由於在300線被取消之後，乘搭地鐵荃灣線的乘客人數大大增加，

> 而且還出現超負荷的情況，運吉署現正準備下令九巴開辦一條來往

> 於中環和旺角之間的路線。而該線必須途經灣仔道一帶 …

第一點:我覺得雖然少左300，可能會少左巴士響街上行走。不過

取消一條巴士線未必代表到交通情況得到改善，因為條街唔只得

巴士行走，仲有其他巴士同車輛行走，而且300所途經街道都係

繁忙街道(Eg:彌敦道,軒尼詩道)，若果同一時間有大量車輛途

經，都會做成塞車。

第二點:如果照閣下所講，相信都會做褔乘客。

第三點:我諗運輸署未必肯批開中環旺角線(經灣仔道)，佢地一定

認為若果再開巴士線，定當會再令中環灣仔大塞車。不過我又覺得

地鐵東涌線起左之後，發覺荃灣線一樣咁多人搭(雖然係好過以前，

少左部份人搭)，反而東涌線都少好多人坐，起碼有時都唔駛企。

~~~Tony(S3M61)~~~

祥華巴士路線專輯

 (九巴)70討論區

Article 71: (Request 1)

。不過我又覺得地鐵東涌線起左之後，發覺荃灣線一樣咁多人搭(雖然係好過以前，

點止起碼早上十點搭出香港都不用企,不過東涌線的客量比預期低左好多

Article 71: (Request 2)

> 291(A/B) Siu (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) said:

>

> Yes.

>

>

> I think the only solution is to increase the frequency of Tiung Chung Line to 2 minutes at peak times, like Tsuen Wan Line, to make more passengers taking it, as it takes more time for people to walk from HK station to Central.

>

> 291(A/B) Siu

仲有個解決方案（可能只是半實用兼純屬搞笑）：

將最塞車的地方禁晒Ｄ有錢佬私人座駕同埋巴士小巴進入，中環塞車情況一定大大得到改善！地鐵電車咪賺到笑唔埋口！仲有將全個中環列晒做禁區，咁咪冇車落客等人，唔駛搞到塞車！

Article 71: (Request 3)

第一、二點互相茅盾喎~ :p

我諗:

運吉會講 : 中環的交通情況已經得到改善

運吉會諗 : 今次地鐵仲唔執番多少, 騎騎騎......

CMB VA52 (HN6509)

Article 71: (Request 4)

這才顯得夠 ‘ 運吉 ’ 嘛 ﹗

最怕如果西隧線的客量因此而暴升的話 … …

(又想像一下先 ﹗^_^)

Article 71: (Request 5)

> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:

> 話說在300線被取消之後，運吉署在中環區內有以下的發現 ﹕

>

> 1. 由於少了十五部行走300線的巴士，該區的交通情況已經得到重大改善 …

>

> 2. 由於多了十五部巴士行走其他途經中環的隧道線，乘客候車的時間已經大大減少 …

>

> 3. 由於在300線被取消之後，乘搭地鐵荃灣線的乘客人數大大增加，而且還出現超負荷的情況，運吉署現正準備下令九巴開辦一條來往於中環和旺角之間的路線。而該線必須途經灣仔道一帶 …

This is just wasting TD officials' time!

So it is better not cancel 300, but just make 300 peak only.

291(A/B) Siu

Article 72:

Re: 邊條線的服務比以前差?

ATR3&3AD52 (m0823@netfront.net) from 202.81.253.230 at Thu May 20 17:11, 1999 said:

> u.best (china@ismart.net) said:

> 例子:

> 新巴:8-----中巴時大把冷馬,現在極少

> 543變43-------用Dart變用寶

> 94X-----------中巴時用LM,新巴用寶,重取消捚

> 城巴:5C-------先用3xx,後用机場版Trident,再用Man,現在用番3xx

Trident只係CTB無聊之作,我諗5C用15xx會好d

> 8X-------早上往柴灣方向脫班

> 九巴:248M,249M-------12米變AM

乜248M,249M有經常用12米?

現在亦好少用AM la....

用12米?現在虧損不夠?

>

> 請接力!

Article 72: (Request 1)

新巴都唔再重視8號呢條線啦,佢宜家已經係重視8P.

248M,249M有用過十二米車咩 ??

佢宜家唔係用AA同ADS咩 ??

城巴:962----以前剛剛轉全日果時,班次什為準確.

宜家常常一黎就黎兩班車,之後要等好耐先有車!

Article 72: (Request 2)

M21--from 20XX and 10XX to DC

110--from 20XX to LF, LV, MB

Article 72: (Request 3)

> 543變43-------用Dart變用寶

這個中巴也不想, 只不過區議會當年一個 '明智' 的決定......

> 94X-----------中巴時用LM,新巴用寶,重取消捚

在中巴時代, 自從722 行LM 後, 94X 已轉用LV.

只不過新巴接手722初期, 派車情況直打回原型.

其實在一間公司資源有限的情況下, 可以看得到它對一些路線的

重視程度, 如8, 23 等就......

> 5C-------先用3xx,後用机場版Trident,再用Man,現在用番3xx

Trident 只不過是暫放je.

CMB VA52 (HN6509)

Article 72: (Request 4)

新記rt.95A用LV好地地用晒d廢柴MC

新記rt.43X早前轉用DC.20XX幾好,而家又用番雞寶

套餐,唉.............

城記rt.85以前用9XX.10XX行走幾好,而家用鬼晒d得過

大字的單層獅子15XX行走,又迫又要罰企,由期繁忙time

還會爆彭.又不肯係繁忙time加雙層巴士行rt.85

城記rt.788 自全日後用好多新的電子牌Volvo 6XX

行走,亦有5XX,9XX,10XX.但而家用晒d廢柴43X,44X,45X

46X,47X,48X的Volvo行走!

Article 72: (Request 5)

CMB's 504 is better than New World First Bus's 4X.

In the past, 504 had services in the afternoon until 1625

from Wa Fu, now? 4X only service in the morning.

There is no express bus services from Wa Fu to Central/Wan Chai

in the afternoon, I can only take the slow 40/40M or walk to

take 90B.

Article 73:

Re: 九巴金躉車身廣告

ATR3&3AD52 (m0823@netfront.net) from 202.81.253.155 at Thu May 20 15:17, 1999 said:

> 3AV113 (ses32569@ses.hkcampus.net) said:

> 其實呢個 'JUC' 廣告同新巴 3002 差唔多, 一樣都係周身貼 Banner.

> 特大 T-Banner 分佈於: 右側車身貼邊, 車尾上下兩節及車頂, 雖然

> 特出, 但係都幾惡頂.

this advertisment has been post on this bus for many months

.....pls aware on bdb

Article 73: (Request 1)

> ATR27&3AD62 (ses32569@ses.hkcampus.net) said:

>

> 你又知我唔知? 我只係想講下我對呢個廣告既意見者, 唔通連咁

> 都唔得?

i haven't say u don't know wor....

i just remind u many people have discussed about this

pls be polite....

Article 73: (Request 2)

希望大家平心靜氣,可能佢想提醒你'傘'!

不過我都認同你個講法,個廣告唔係好掂!

啊Dick

Article 74:

Re: 壞車過客問題

Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) from 168.70.94.227 at Thu May 20 18:31, 1999 said:

> Peggy Lau VA 11 (nakata-chih-ping@i-cable.com) said:

> 今朝搭新記948(VA 19)返學, 去到西隧收費廣場,原本司機冇打算駛入巴士站(每次搭新寄車司機都唔會駛入),

> 後來司機見到咖九記948壞o左, 於是駛入去過客, 當架車停低時,乘客當然圍在車門前, 但那名九巴司機不知

> 講了甚麼,乘客便離開,轉乘後面幾乎滿載的934,935, 我班車就開走,並冇上客,有冇人知究竟點解???

其實係若果果架巴士中途壞車，司機過客時可以截同一方向既任何

巴士過客。

因為934,935同948都係以銅鑼灣為終點站，所以若948壞車，都可以

過客到934,935(其實914,968都得)。

講開壞車，朝早響沙田見到架密龍死火。

~~~Tony(S3M61)~~~

祥華巴士路線專輯

 (九巴)70討論區

Article 75:

Re: 新巴新聞稿﹕新巴路線43X接載市民觀賞熊貓

小丸子新巴色VA54 (c8002953@net1.hkbu.edu.hk) from 158.182.1.38 at Thu May 20 17:53, 1999 said:

> Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) said:

> 繼日前城巴利用新聞稿來宣傳前往海洋公園的路線之後，新巴也不甘

> 示弱，推出了以下這篇新聞稿 ﹕

>

> 新巴路線43X接載市民觀賞熊貓

嘩!新記又有樣學樣,但好心該日的rt.43X特班次應

減價!

VA54 HN8897

Article 76:

鐵路一開,巴士即死?

u.best (china@ismart.net) from 202.40.137.110 at Thu May 20 15:53, 1999 said:

運吉話西鐵等落成後,巴士會少成籮客,對不對?

東涌線是一個好例子......

原先地鐵唸住係人都會搭,唔搭机鐵都搭東涌線啦!九巴也計劃縮減

青衣路線,開M1,M2,用大車行248M,249M,結果係點?大家知啦!

為甚麼連和地鐵重疊的E11,E31都唔死呢?原因大致有

1 巴士提供點對點服務------又要搭M線,又搭地鐵,行上行落,又貴唔

少,點解唔搭巴士(此乃248M,249M死因)

我對西鐵都有收費此疑問

2 收費較平---------------這點在西鐵方面更值得注意.據98年標準

西鐵全程要27元(欽州街至屯門為例)

60X just $11,點鬧?

3 快速公路相繼落成-------縮短巴士行車時間,重快過地鐵!

試想:搭開680,681,960,961,968,969

乘客會唔會因西鐵等落成而改變習慣?

俾$40蚊都唔奇!($27西鐵+10地鐵,由屯門

出港島)

4 冇位坐---------------

我對西鐵(太貴),馬鐵(太短)無乜信心.唯一睇好將軍澳線.

Remember,Hong Kong people custom change now!

Article 76: (Request 1)

Well, the M1 & M2 are just for MTR feeding, and died.

> 為甚麼連和地鐵重疊的E11,E31都唔死呢?原因大致有

> 1 巴士提供點對點服務------又要搭M線,又搭地鐵,行上行落,又貴唔少,點解唔搭巴士(此乃248M,249M死因) 我對西鐵都有收費此疑問

That's the most important point. 930 is an example, even it is more expensive than MTR.

> 2 收費較平---------------這點在西鐵方面更值得注意.據98年標準西鐵全程要27元(欽州街至屯門為例) 60X just $11,點鬧?

Especially for 58M/X, which start from Tuen Mun Pier (West Rail does not start from the pier)

> 3 快速公路相繼落成-------縮短巴士行車時間,重快過地鐵! 試想:搭開680,681,960,961,968,969 乘客會唔會因西鐵等落成而改變習慣? 俾$40蚊都唔奇!($27西鐵+10地鐵,由屯門出港島)

No, they would not change their habit.

> 4 冇位坐---------------

Can't agree more!

291(A/B) Siu

Article 77:

a/c bus is cheaper than hotdog?

u.best (china@ismart.net) from 202.40.137.110 at Thu May 20 15:12, 1999 said:

Yesterday i dial NWFB hotline to ask the information about

65 and i heard that only a/c buses provide sectional fare

from Repulse Bay to North Point($5.5).Is it true?

Hotdog still cost $6 at Repulse Bay?(but i remember that

63 cost $4.9 from Repulse Bay to North Point)

u.best

Article 78:

Re: 城記躉編號一問

3AD46/HJ8388 (s986380@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) from 137.189.4.4 at Thu May 20 19:10, 1999 said:

> Peggy Lau VA 11 (nakata-chih-ping@i-cable.com) said:

> 點解城記躉編號冇2214o既??

城巴連 2231 都無，唔知係唔係出唔到街？

Article 79:

轉車會否平d?

小丸子新巴色VA54 (c8002953@net1.hkbu.edu.hk) from 158.182.1.35 at Thu May 20 18:29, 1999 said:

VA61兄同我講,佢有次搭地龍係鑽石山轉九記rt.286M

去馬鞍山,佢話俾我聽車資會平過搭新記rt.680喎!

地龍轉巴士會否平過搭直達隧巴呢 ?

THX!

VA54 HN8897

Article 80:

(ad) My discussion boards have easy URL

291(A/B) Siu (eg_slk@stu.ust.hk) from 202.40.139.40 at Thu May 20 17:57, 1999 said:

This is an Ad of new easy to remember URLs for my discussion boards:

291(A/B) Siu's Transport Forum: http://w3.to/ctb291bdb

You can discuss anything about transport, including ferries, traines or even air transport there.

HK Joking Routes Supermarket: http://hey.to/hk-joking-routes

You can suggest any joking route suggestions (including water & air) there.

But, please DO NOT post any pornographic or violence materials or with foul languages. Also don't spam my boards.

Enjoy discussion tonight!

291(A/B) Siu

Article 81:

296x一問!

??? (h9470000@hkusua.hku.hk) from 202.40.141.30 at Thu May 20 17:49, 1999 said:

請問有誰知道296x是否有三架兩味車?

Article 82:

[相片]證明 S3N 入禁區

GZ5818 (kytse1@netvigator.com) from 168.70.68.71 at Thu May 20 19:10, 1999 said:

有熱狗十一米入禁區!

73K 在全冷前半年 , 常用大車(平日都有) ,

如:S3M EG6915 , S3N ES5571

78K 早上亦有 ME .

現提供珍貴相片:

GZ5818/Tonio Tse

Article 83:

KMB ME runs on '68M' Photo!

Cape of Good Hope (il2239@netvigator.com) from 208.151.66.231 at Thu May 20 19:08, 1999 said:

ME on KMB 68M:

http://members.xoom.com/ANCT/newpage13.htm

香港巴士討論區舊文庫＜新版＞．

19990520

Today's Articles: 83.

Articles' Numbers: (19990520_01-83)

Re: 有相睇

AC vs non-AC service

Re: Where can I download TDT ????

【大相廣告】九巴都普鴨 (N253) 行 85K 特別車

Centroliner o係沙田

Complaint: Foul language in opinions!!

Re: GA1係乜黎架???!!!

必達場係邊???

Centroliner o係沙田

板友停板通告 0519

Re: [討論]大家於本板的習慣.

Re: 意外地找到了G33相片

Re: 點解而家朝早新記rt.948往長安都收$15.3?

Re: 邊條路線用S3BL過禁區?

where are you?

Re: KMB 296A have Trident!

Re: D三軸車用中軸來驅動好定尾軸來驅動好?

【傳聞】691明日加躉＆【大相廣告】都普鴨

What's the meaning of Route Suggestion?

Re: 城巴新聞稿﹕七十一備增值器 城巴表歡迎

今日終於見到九巴仔......個廣告

Re: 早上7:17am 691用躉直擊

Re: To those typing foul languages here

Re: Old pages

Re: Note: Foul language in opinion again!!

Re: 問巴士模型資料

Re: 城巴水如河湧

Re: 呢架係咪 722 既躉呢?

錦田場買0野適可而止!!

Re: 緊急尋找(優之良品)廣告新巴

Re: 【查詢】82x轉全冷日期

Re: 新巴躉新廣告+新巴終於用髹掃掃佢D Trident

On 260

Behaviours of fans, Give your opinions!

Re: 2500去了何處 ?

Re: Any Bus Model must be release soon???

Re: 錦田故事

Re: History of 33, 33A, 33B, 33C AND 34

Re: 徵求:龍運CX Trident相

(ad)291(A/B) Siu's Transport Forum

新記rt.14一問?

【大相廣告】九巴個九巴仔個廣告..巨龍大相

Is this appopriate?

【網頁廣告】(九巴)70討論區

[廣告]Cyber-X 公共交通及運輸新聞組

[廣告]線網縱橫 300號尾日相及九巴296X單張

KMB hotline

[再問]歷史

今日58P尾車無故失蹤

Re: Information on LT10/LTA10 Engine

【廣告】特區交通分類廣告

[網頁緊急通告]路線238X巴士網頁

原來銀行都有巴士物品出喎

問那處可以有新界前專利巴士資料

What's going happen + New 870 BusGallery

緊急通告﹕本板出事前最後一篇文

問點樣整用完即棄舞台用道具巴士 ?

Re: 新巴新聞稿﹕新巴路線63增設空調服務

What is the differences between ...?

LF和SF賣`什麼廣告和行走什麼路線

Someone bomb my e-mail account

[問]巴士線

about S3N92

Re: 壞車

(Ad) Paper Bus Connection

九記超級富豪奧黏現於屯裝

尋車!

【網頁廣告】60X,E33,962特寫、九巴Trident、A52,914傳單

Re: What is the different between 70/270A

Re: 新九rt.948應否摺埋?

我的意見

Re: 邊條線的服務比以前差?

Re: 九巴金躉車身廣告

Re: 壞車過客問題

Re: 新巴新聞稿﹕新巴路線43X接載市民觀賞熊貓

鐵路一開,巴士即死?

Re: 城巴新聞稿﹕七十一備增值器城巴表歡迎