Today's Articles: 17!!!!
Articles' Numbers: (19990212_01-17)
Please press the following links to the articles immediately：
以下連結可直接看到每一篇主文章：
第1篇文 第2篇文 第3篇文 第4篇文 第5篇文 第6篇文 第7篇文 第8篇文 第9篇文 第10篇文
第11篇文 第12篇文 第13篇文 第14篇文 第15篇文 第16篇文 第17篇文
Article 1:
Stagecoach躉 + 道歉聲明一則
NV58 (tin.wong@kcl.ac.uk) from 137.73.180.142 at Fri Feb 12 02:56, 1999 said:
今天放學走左去London Bridge Stn看躉, 結果見到TA7(此外仲有一部躉
埋站, 不過看不到Flt no). 部TA7停響總站，行48號。整体上TA的ALX400
車身与DLA的ALX400車身分別頗大，如DLA系centre staircase, TA系同香
港D躉一樣, staircase放前軸上面, 但落車門的位置不變(即後軸對前).
躉有一個輪椅位, DLA有兩個; 輪椅位(左前軸對後)對後有一排雙座位, 右
前軸對後至後軸對前有幾個單丁位; 全車用番Stagecoach標准布局和bus
seat.
其他的資料遲D奉上.
另在路線建議欄中小弟在Comment 208A的建議時不慎打漏《/b》,
故幾乎全部都highlight左(其實我只系想highlight個'NEVER' 同 'NOT')
不便之處, 敬希原諒. :p
被板主個紅色罵戰警告嚇親的
NV58
Making London simple
九記開始換新路線牌外殼
jason (kcrjasonchan@ctimail.com) from 202.45.37.30 at Fri Feb 12 11:47, 1999 said:
昨天見到長沙灣道的九記巴士站，部份轉了新的路線牌外殼，如果是全部更換了就好。
及日前亦有板友提及九記有新廣告，是通宵線及冷氣車廣告，都幾好。
Article 2: (Request 1)
> Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) said:
> 不過我唸九巴係有需要換晒巴士站牌，反正舊既站牌都係用左幾
> 十年，係時侯要換一換站牌。但係都係要逐步來，反正九巴巴士
> 站太多喇，一次過換晒又要好多時間。
我諗你誤會左...jason兄講的係我地成日講果D「乳豬盤」.
新乳豬盤大0左,闊0左,類似新/城記果D,有「防盜」/「防破壞」作用.
(不過上排有人在九記總部睇到有新站牌,不過都未正式生產.)
Ronald
Article 2: (Request 2)
可能個標題誤會左，以為係換站牌所致
在此講聲Sorry!^_^
Re: 城巴有冇 dennis 巴士 ?
DC10 (s986380@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) from 137.189.4.7 at Fri Feb 12 12:00, 1999 said:
> 機械巴士 (kfliu@polyu.hkc.net) said:
> 城巴有冇 dennis 巴士 ?
> 有的話係 : ??
> 冇的話係唔係有需要 : ??
> Please tell me !!
你o既問題係「係唔係有需要有Dennis巴士」
定係「係唔係有需要有某一種類型o既Dennis巴士」呀？
Article 3: (Request 1)
唔!~~~
每一間巴士公司一定有Dennis巴士啦
城巴都有:
例如:
Dennis Dragon 10.4m(7xx)
Dennis Dragon 12m(8xx)
Dennis Dart(14xx)
Dennis Trident(21xx-22xx)
~~~Tony(S3M61)~~~
祥華巴士路線專輯(Cwahp)
Article 3: (Request 2)
當然有啦。
有Dart, Trident, Dragon囉
Re: 邊部巴士一炒就永不超生??
NV58 (tin.wong@kcl.ac.uk) from 137.73.180.142 at Fri Feb 12 13:57, 1999 said:
> DR4834 (h9810424@hkusua.hku.hk) said:
> 城記部870翻轉左都整得返
> N年前果部G470係屯門翻轉左都又攪得掂
> 聽聞燒左既車都整得翻
>
> 究竟有冇一部巴士真係炒左之後就要去TONG呢??
G94, G440...
竟然被291 Siu send左份email, 有D擔心自身安全的
NV58
Making London simple
Article 4: (Request 1)
KMB AD2
CMB MC8
Re: TWISK PAGE 加入 KMB AP1 馬鞍山試車相
Bruce Li (bruceli@vcn.bc.ca) from 202.67.218.92 at Fri Feb 12 10:00, 1999 said:
> Gary Tang (purity2@hkstar.com) said:
>
> TWISK PAGE 加入 KMB AP1 馬鞍山試車相六張, 歡迎參觀.
影得好正喎! 謝謝!
Bruce
Article 5: (Request 1)
想問下係咪全部Neoplan都係荔廠？
Re: 問偈
NV58 (tin.wong@kcl.ac.uk) from 137.73.180.142 at Fri Feb 12 10:47, 1999 said:
> DR4834 (h9810424@hkusua.hku.hk) said:
> 下列車款副偈有沒有不同 如有 有咩唔同
>
> 城記8XX同九記3AD (好似3AD嘈好多 好多)
CTB 8XX : Cummins LTA10 (280bhp)
KMB 3AD : Cummins M11-235E (235bhp)
> 城記十一冷豪同九記十一冷豪 (我覺得D聲唔同D)
CTB 901-950 : Volvo TD102KF
CTB 951+ : Volvo D10A
> 九記十一冷豪同九記冷利蘭 (最佳引擎聲 首選冷利蘭)
> 九記3X2豪同九記2X2豪
KMB AV1, 112-? : Volvo TD102KF (245bhp)
KMB AV2-111 : Cummins LT10 (245bhp)
KMB AV?-5XX : Volvo D10A (250bhp)
KMB AL : Cummins LT10 (245bhp)
> 九記 新記及城記躉
> 配山寨及都普車身既躉
>
All Tridents : Cummins M11-305E (305bhp)
> 仲有 城記部870是否仲行緊??
Yes.
NV58 ^_^
Making London simple
Article 6: (Request 1)
> CTB 8XX : Cummins LTA10 (280bhp)
> KMB 3AD : Cummins M11-235E (235bhp)
但係唔知係咪因為副偈馬力唔多夠, 所以九記 D 3AD 鎖車冇
鎖到咁勁架, 通常都可以行得快過 AV o既!
不過我始終覺得最勁都係 Turbo M, 十米車冇副冷機o係車尾,
重要配上 LTA10, 成 280 匹喎! (正常應該係十一或十二米空調
車先配呢副偈架嘛!) 所以 Turbo M 真係超勁爽呀!
Re: NEWSPAPER-bus route is changed illegally
Shirley (momoko62@netvigator.com) from 208.151.72.79 at Fri Feb 12 11:27, 1999 said:
> LM3,ATR3,333 (angela05@netvigator.com) said:
> The bus route is changed by the bus company but she does not
> inform to any department to change their route!
>
> P.S.the above information gained from MingPao electronic newspaper!
Sorry,你到底講緊乜?
我發覺你大部份英文文章的內容都令人不明白你的寓意/用意.
請改善和見諒!
另請不要重覆貼文.
看了文好耐今次第一次貼文的女板友
Shirley
Article 7: (Request 1)
有時出現重覆貼文的情形并不足為怪，實非作者能控制。
(Sorry, 版主, 離左題)
過去亦出現過類似情形的
NV58
Making London simple
Article 7: (Request 2)
跟據我的理解，您是指巴士公司更改路線資料，但沒有向外公告？您可從報章中得知。生果及方向日報都有報導。
Re: 贊成
NV58 (tin.wong@kcl.ac.uk) from 137.73.180.142 at Fri Feb 12 14:35, 1999 said:
> DC10 (s986380@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) said:
> 開巴士路線o既原意，是為了方便市民
> 如果已有類似路線
> 請不要再建議相近路線
> 或指定新路線是某一間公司經營
>
> 避免不必要爭詏
> 好嗎？
I think the purpose of the Rt suggestion section is to provide us
a chance to give out some way which can improve the HK bus network.
Who operates the route, however, I don't thick is important.
NV58
Making London simple
rabbit year bus KMB have?
Rick (chopchoi@hknet.com) from 202.67.253.73 at Fri Feb 12 09:45, 1999 said:
> LM3,ATR3,333 (angela05@netvigator.com) said:
> Like the topic.
>
> THANKS
> LM3,ATR3,333
I have seen one on Rt.6 yesterday.
It is a 3AV(HG4169)
Rick
Bus Info Net
Situation in Central London
NV58 (tin.wong@kcl.ac.uk) from 137.73.180.142 at Fri Feb 12 06:35, 1999 said:
> HR1969 (si439741@icard.hkstar.com) said:
> After reading '論熱狗的存在價值: 巴士真係有需要全冷?' written by Joseph.
> I suddenly think that UK people, they also have Air Conditioned Buses, but why, the very old bus such as Fleetline, Routemaster also have many people like to take not like Hong Kong?
>
> I hope the boardmates in UK can tell us.
>
> HR1969
In London, all except Airbuses are non-a/c, though heating is provided in most buses.
Firstly, Fleetlines (DM/DMS) were withdrawn from frontline service some years ago. But
older buses like Metrobuses and Titans. The reason for Londoners to take buses is pro-
bably because they are more direct than the tube. As long as the bus will come, they
seldom care about the waiting time (unless the bus comes too late) or even the model
(This is what I've observed after a few rides on 242's DLAs, it seems that people didn't
care about it).
The reason why many prople takes RM/RML is because of its hop-on hop-off operation, which
allows great flexibility for passengers. In fact the RM/RMLs which are still in service
have been refurbished or even re-engined.
This is what I can tell you about the situation in Central London. In fact most people
takes the tube instead as it 'seems' to be more reliable. According to local people, London
Buses are nothing worth to take (Though I take them every day ^_^)
Hope this can answer your queries.
NV58
Making London simple
超級無敵估估下﹕城巴網頁大革新
Dennis Law (elawcy@alpha7.curtin.edu.au) from 208.151.71.95 at Fri Feb 12 13:19, 1999 said:
據可靠消息透露，城巴網頁將會在短期內作全面革新。而新網頁將會加上很多會令乘
客和巴士迷感到有興趣的資料，以及一些新功能。
那究竟有什麼新資料和新功能會被加入城巴網頁之內呢﹖大家不妨猜猜吧﹗^_^
MB question!!
LA18 (choipui@netvigator.com) from 208.151.68.167 at Fri Feb 12 09:31, 1999 said:
MB is 11 metre long,why MB is not 3-axis?????
新巴新車冇消防筒
Bruce Li (bruceli@vcn.bc.ca) from 202.67.219.243 at Fri Feb 12 08:12, 1999 said:
昨天趁有空去嘗試坐新巴14號德仔，在西灣河地鐵站等不足
五分鐘，便有一架2083到達，在途中發現原來位於駕駛室旁
之放置消防筒位置，雖然有玻璃，但內裏空空如也．．．．
請問，跟據法例是否所有巴士應該裝有消防筒呢？
希望新巴不要掛住快點出新車，而忘記了安裝安全設備吧！
Bruce
巴士新聞--新巴撞車＋新城爭羈保險問題
9807 (autobus@globility.com) from 142.194.243.6 at Fri Feb 12 08:02, 1999 said:
新巴與救謢車相撞
以下是三段由日月報剪下來有關新城之爭，巴士改路冇保險的問題
第一篇--保險
第二篇
新城出車之爭
Thank you!
Re: FALCON問題二個
HZ 5519 (miketal@hkstar.com) from 202.82.63.10 at Fri Feb 12 16:59, 1999 said:
> chung (chengtt@ctimail.com) said:
> 請問FALCON是否快退役?
> 若是,用Falcon行的線(e.g.285,203E...)會用什麼車替??(AM,AN??)
Today,i saw AM on 285
有關 N293,N691 消息
AD1 EL5113 (el5113@hutchcity.com) from 202.67.253.8 at Fri Feb 12 17:08, 1999 said:
N293 由2月13日晚起, 改為 尚德-九龍城.
N691 由2月14日晚起, 改為 尚德-中環(港澳碼頭).
現在還有單張掛在有關的站.
屯門市中心新陣營
屯兵 (chungtm@netteens.net) from 205.252.144.176 at Fri Feb 12 16:50, 1999 said:
今日經過屯門市中心，原本的６６和９６１已搬到外面小巴隔離
本來的位置讓路給２６１Ｒ，而N30,N260,59S,521與A59
將不受影響，繼續停原本的位置．
敬請留意！
沒有留言:
張貼留言