Today's Articles: 51.
Articles' Numbers: (19990128_01-51)
Article 1:
Re: Bus Driving in NFSII PC Version
GZ5818 (kytse1@netvigator.com) from 208.139.120.145 at Thu Jan 28 20:04, 1999 said:
> Samuel C (scheung@charon.com) said:
> Don't know if the game 'Need For Speed II' (it's
> kinda old now)is that popular in HK.
> Anyway, I just found out this game can
> call up many different secret cars as desired.
> Perhaps, one of the option is to drive
> a yellow school bus and race with bunch of sports
> cars!
> However, the top speed of the bus is only 100km/h!
> I am now looking for a NFSII car editor and see if
> I can modify the bus to make it
> 100% HK Double Decker looks.
> If anybody interested, I can post the URL here which
> contain the related info.
>
> Samuel C in Canada
Secret code for increasing the max. speed is
PIONEER
GZ5818
Article 1: (Request 1)
> 9822 DA53 (felixt@accessv.com) said:
>
> There's a cheat code to make your secret vehicle as fast as the
> other sport cars! I've tried that before on the truck as well as the
> school bus!
>
>
> Which part of Canada are u living in?
Hey Felix, I think I know you! I am the one
who lives in Mississauga, Hwy10 and Eglington.
You had sent me a couple of emails before(sorry
that I didn't reply your mail :P).
I haven't been here(HKBDB) for a long time, due
to the job nature(irregular working hr, but it's
now in the past, yes I found a new job!)
By the way, do you know if the Brampton Transit's
Double Decker still exist? If so, I want to go
for a ride, Thanks for your help!
Samuel C in Canada
Article 2:
Re: 1999-2000 石籬區巴士路線發展計劃
Jacky,S3M156 (jackyyng@hkschool.net) from 202.45.191.4 at Thu Jan 28 22:01, 1999 said:
> 43A常客 (dcywa31@netvigator.com) said:
> 據民X黨議員的通告，九巴計劃的路線發展計劃如下：
> 註：括弧內為議員的意見
>
> 1.31B加空調巴士，收費未定。(收費不可太貴)
> 你的意見：
$4.7
>
> 2.31M四月加空調巴士，收費$3.50。(收費應與235M看齊，即$3.20)
> 你的意見：
曾經話加的，收$3.5。
>
>
> 3.32縮短為石圍角至石籬，收費未定。(可行，但必須尊重石圍角及梨木樹居民意見，同時改善綠巴406)
> 你的意見：
呢個，否決左啦！
想32縮短，九巴肯定俾人鬧死。呢條線都有一定需求。
~~呢條線可以改插一架冷馬。
>
>
> 4.35A二千年加一部車，即加至14部車。(應在1999年加)
> 你的意見：
好事。
>
>
> 5.31不變。(應改善行車路線)
> 你的意見：
要啦。31同36又同235重疊。
>
>
> 其他路線未有提及。
>
> 各板友如有任何意見，請在我的意見一欄填上。
>
> 43A常客 上
Jacky,S3M156
Article 2: (Request 1)
Any hope for 935 a whole day service???
Article 2: (Request 2)
> 1.31B加空調巴士，收費未定。(收費不可太貴)
> 你的意見：
幾好呀, 我諗都係收$4.7 左右.
> 2.31M四月加空調巴士，收費$3.50。(收費應與235M看齊，即$3.20)
> 你的意見：
不如收兩者的中間數($3.3-3.4) 啦, 廢事一陣又加唔成.
> 3.32縮短為石圍角至石籬，收費未定。(可行，但必須尊重石圍角及梨木樹居民意見，同時改善綠巴406)
> 你的意見：
好似唔係咁好, 縮短咁多. 應該都有好多人搭32 出九龍, 這點我不贊成.
> 4.35A二千年加一部車，即加至14部車。(應在1999年加)
> 你的意見：
加一架咁少, 起碼加多幾架啦. 我見35A 都幾疏.
AV102
Article 2: (Request 3)
>2.31M四月加空調巴士，收費$3.50。(收費應與235M看齊，即$3.20)
> 你的意見：
希望今次會係真啦，上年十月31M話加空調，結果臨到加之前既一
日又話唔加住。
>
> 3.32縮短為石圍角至石籬，收費未定。(可行，但必須尊重石圍角及梨木樹居民意見，同時改善綠巴406)
> 你的意見：
咁石圍角、象山既人出九龍就會冇巴士直接去到，除非將36B或者
31B延長去石圍角，所以基本上唔贊成九巴咁做。
>
> 4.35A二千年加一部車，即加至14部車。(應在1999年加)
> 你的意見：
>
> 5.31不變。(應改善行車路線)
> 你的意見：
呢兩個冇異議
Article 2: (Request 4)
> Jess (c5013830@hkbu.edu.hk) said:
> 但係真架播, 36B真係要延長去石圍角播, 因為梨木樹個商場要重建
> 嘛.
> Jess
咁樣32要停去邊?!
去象山，取消32B呢條線可行嗎?!
Article 2: (Request 5)
> S3BL257 (wingkit@school.net.hk) said:
>
> 32 應改為荃碼至石蘺,
> 以方便和宜合道沿途的學生
> s3bl257
朋友，開條32P咪仲好！
你都知我成日都搭佢啦！
:P
Article 3:
巴士公司有無規定唔准行中間既快易通?
T.P.T. (dckk@netteens.net) from 158.132.14.15 at Thu Jan 28 18:46, 1999 said:
成日搭車經過香港仔隧道, 發覺就算係塞車o的司機都剩係識得行
左面的快易通, 唔通巴士公司規定唔准行中間既快易通?
每週相片推介 -- VA55 行 94X
網頁推介: Photo Hunter.....
T.P.T.
Article 3: (Request 1)
> R Lai (raymansc@hkg.com) said:
> 無, 因為我試過數次(香隧, 將隧, 獅隧我都試過)
邊條獅隧路線啊? 該條路線停唔停收費亭左邊個巴士站架?
如果出九龍唔行最左邊既快易通, 好似停唔到個巴士站喎...
HB 916
Article 3: (Request 2)
我當時搭89.
向沙田方向, 有站但無停(無人上落)
仲有, 獅隧好少線要停個巴士站播
我都見過87D過右邊快易通啦
Article 3: (Request 3)
以前聽過黃公司唔準車長行中間o既 '駕易通' 通道，而家唔知。
哈！邊度o黎o既呢，唔似係東村喎。
唔通頓兄o既改相技術已經到達鬼斧神功o既地步？ :p
417
P.S. 頓兄見字請與小弟聯絡（抱歉小弟電郵今日 22:00-
明日早上因學校電力供應系統需維修不能使用，請避免在
上述時間內來郵）。
Article 3: (Request 4)
好簡單，就係費事左 cut 右 cut，做成危險。
出隧道入收費亭：
首先，巴士0係隧道內係要行慢線，出隧道口若果要入中間0既快易通
，先要同快線(右邊) 0的車鬥快。過完收費亭之後，又要 cut 返過
慢線，然後埋站。
反之，若過過收費亭入隧道0既話，架車又要 S 型0甘左 cut 右 cut
法，所以塞車都冇辦法，安全第一嘛！
胡亂轉線，易生意外......
傑仔 RLX1
Article 3: (Request 5)
冇錯喇~~ 重型車要靠左行駛丫嘛~
William Fung
Article 4:
Re: 路線A43的時間表
Gary&Carol (garycarol@ctimail.com) from 208.151.82.30 at Thu Jan 28 14:14, 1999 said:
> Kwan (sfac3a09@netvigator.com) said:
> 星期六開始A43正式行走,而龍運職員中午在華明村派A43的傳單.
> 時間如下
> 華明開:
> 5:30 6:45 7:00 8:00 8:45 9:30 10:15 11:15 12:00
> 12:45 13:30 14:30 15:15 16:00 16:45 17:45 18:30
> 19:15 20:00 21:00 21:45 22:30
>
> 機場開:
> 7:10 7:55 8:40 9:40 10:25 11:10 12:00 12:55 13:40
> 14:25 15:10 16:10 16:55 17:40 18:25 19:25 20:10
> 20:55 21:40 22:40 23:20 0:00
>
> 因為我要返學,我冇問過職員的收費及用車.
> 而星期六頭車仍是5:30.
>
> 今日食飯走過對面取傳單的Kwan
早上既班次咁可怕既? 係咪寫錯左? 定龍運出錯?
5:30 6:45 7:00??
一係咁疏, 成75 分鐘一班, 跟住就15 分鐘開一架?
會唔會係 5:30 6:15 7:00 至真呢?
照時間表黎睇, 似係用四架車行
Article 4: (Request 1)
Yes.The timetable should be 0530,0615,0700......
I've checked already.
(Wah......The Journey time is 95-100 minutes!!!!)
DL
Article 4: (Request 2)
> GZ5818 (kytse1@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 今日有 3 部龍運 lance 操 A43 ,> (係就慘....)
> 唔知係咪用 lance 行 A43 ?
>
> GZ5818
我唸最大機會都係用Trident行，因為都唔會派單層Lance行咁長
途既路線，而且Lance裝左行李架之後，座位數目一定會好少，而
且A線車派Lance行實在好慘。
另外唔知A43會唔會停大欖轉車站呢？
P.S:A43開左之後，肯定會有一個奇景，就係上水有一條龍運街，
如果龍運A43途經龍運街時，係唔係會好應景呢？
~~~傳聞今日S3M61行70，都幾有意義~~~
Article 4: (Request 3)
兜上水火車站 (270 站) , 上水廣場.
GZ5818
Article 5:
A look to the tail of ALX400
NV58 (tin.wong@kcl.ac.uk) from 137.73.180.142 at Thu Jan 28 09:54, 1999 said:
Probably you guys are familiar to the front of ALX400 body.
But how about the tail?
Warning : You might be disappointed after taking a look at it. I think it's pretty ugly.
NV58
Making London simple
Article 5: (Request 1)
> 阿立 (pwdckwan@lynx.bc.ca) said:
> Does the bus have air-cond. system?
> It seems that the windows can not be opened ...
>
> 阿立
No. Do you think it's necessary to have a/c in UK?
The windows are fixed. But I wonder why?
NV58
Making London simple
Article 5: (Request 2)
> 阿立 (pwdckwan@lynx.bc.ca) said:
> I don't know what's the temperature of UK in summer ....
> Is that hot/cool?
>
> The temperature in Vancouver is about 25 in summer, but
> I feel there's a need of A/C system in buses because it's
> very hot inside the bus (with very small windows opened !)
>
> 阿立, who wants to know more about London Buses ...
Around 20-25C la.
If you want to know more, kindly drop an email to me. Thanx.
(p.s. Sorry to Ken Fung for irrelevant information)
NV58
Making London simple
Article 5: (Request 3)
Well, I think the temperature in London, hence whether or not
if an ALX400 bodied Trident is equipped with A/C is relevant
here.
If A/C can be installed on a bus with 2 axles, then they can
be introduced in Hong Kong lar! (and NWFB will definitely order
some to run on route 109!)
If there is no A/C at all, can any passenger survive in a bus at
around 20-25C without ANY window openings? Has there been
any bus in London in the past without any window opening?
I do not question your knowledge, as I just want to know more...
100/911R/M1 Wong
Article 5: (Request 4)
NV58 please reply my email...
(sorry for irrelavant messages)
3AD1
Article 6:
有無發覺好多城巴車頭都無o左塊膠牌?
T.P.T. (dckk@netteens.net) from 158.132.14.15 at Thu Jan 28 18:45, 1999 said:
點解我近排見好多城巴車頭都無o左塊logo既膠牌既? 唔通比人撻?
定係鬆得濟跌o左呢? 抑或比捷達收購o左, 要收起o的牌呢? ...
另外仲有樣野要講講, 有好多城巴車個跳字牌都係無數字顯示出
o黎, 又唔貼路線既影印紙/手寫紙, 剩係攪個地方牌, 都唔知係
乜路線.
每週相片推介 -- VA55 行 94X
網頁推介: Photo Hunter.....
T.P.T.
Article 6: (Request 1)
正確o黎講,捷達仲未正式收購(倒)城巴,
因為內裡仲會有好多變數令到捷達不能成功收購城巴.
在此也不多談了.
華人上
Article 6: (Request 2)
相信只是鬆脫了下來吧了。
(因為我都曾經見過不少城巴，在行駛途中，那塊牌突然鬆脫掉下。)
Article 6: (Request 3)
Ricky Chan (95098987d@polyu.edu.hk) said:
> 我覺得係連個司機都唔知個牌冇顯示,
> 其實如果佢照按但個牌壞左, 佢都唔知o既.
> 個牌仲要著親車都轉一次, 幾時壞左都唔知.
壞牌情況經常出現在 690 上.
我已經見過好多次架車車頭車尾都冇出數字牌.
---
本月金句：獨沽一味，做好自己
Article 7:
Re: 遊戲机中心
GZ5818 (kytse1@netvigator.com) from 208.139.120.145 at Thu Jan 28 19:49, 1999 said:
> Brian (btch@netvigator.com) said:
> 本人在旺角某地庫遊戲機中心發現有部機可以喳單層巴士,
> $10 一舖, 有無人知那巴士是甚麼型號?
> 有無人試過好唔好喳?
我渣過 , 好正 , 軑又夠重 , 好多人都揀渣巴士 .
GZ5818
Article 7: (Request 1)
> Kwan (sfac3a09@netvigator.com) said:
>
> 那部是三菱(如果我冇記錯的話).
> 有處可以以$5交易.
邊度有?
Article 7: (Request 2)
灣仔各大巴士由香港仔轉出路口附近
Article 8:
Re: 城市巴士有限公司??
9807 (autobus@globility.com) from 142.194.244.125 at Thu Jan 28 09:23, 1999 said:
> DR4834 (h9810424@hkusua.hku.hk) said:
> 突然想起 一年前左右的一個下午 因為冇野做 打開部電視看一下教X電視
> 咁岩就講交通(三年級) 介紹巴士 內容大概如下:
>
> 香港有四間巴士公司 九龍巴士有限公司 簡稱九巴 中華巴士有限公司
> 簡稱中巴 大嶼山巴士公司 及
>
> 當時我真係想噴飯 因為我未聽過此名詞 所以我想問各位:
> 係我大驚小怪定佢真係犯左個咁好笑既錯誤?
人地黃巴士開檔個時，個中文名真係叫城市巴士有限公司架，小記得
以前沙田第一城係見過。
Article 8: (Request 1)
> 死老鬼SLK (97017130j@polyu.edu.hk) said:
>
> 不過人地都叫左城巴公司好耐啦! 其實會唔會d人見佢個英文係citybus
> 就照譯個中文叫城市巴士呀?
>
> o岩o岩手多睇下呢個網頁, 發覺有同樣情況出現!
>
> http://www.orientaldaily.com.hk/phn_c02.html
It calls Citybus 城市巴士, why not call NWFB 新世界巴士 :P?
Even the later one bears mistake, do you know what's wrong?
>
> 死老鬼SLK
--
輝仔
In School Laboratory
Article 8: (Request 2)
KMB︰九龍巴士(一九三三)巴士有限公司 (九巴)
CMB︰中華汽車有限公司 (中巴)
CTB︰城巴集團有限公司 (城巴)
NWFB︰新世界第一巴士公司 (新巴)
Article 8: (Request 3)
就連偉大o既''咩謊日報''都係咁錯o左起碼成年啦! 邊度? ''有用電話''欄囉.
不過算啦, 呢張死不認錯o既爛仔報紙....
Mike NG(CMB-LF126)
(BL50 - DC2270)
Article 8: (Request 4)
全部位都裝快餐椅.
小弟只知一部份:
HU7455 - 80X
HU7855 - 80X
HU9385 - 86
HV9280 - 86A
唔好再去282 搵快餐椅啦! 282 而家冇晒快餐椅啦!
HB 916
Article 9:
Re: 路線建議欄署名投票結果
9807 (autobus@globility.com) from 142.194.244.125 at Thu Jan 28 08:28, 1999 said:
> Jess (c5013830@hkbu.edu.hk) said:
> 見板主無公佈就代佢公佈埋.
> 投票結果在此
> 睇完投票結果兼評語, 見差不多半數都贊成署名, 認為令提意見者負
> 責任, 但結果卻是反對署名者大比數勝出, 點解?
> 乜多左個名就會俾人尋仇嗎? 係的話, 應該唸下自己意見有無人身攻
> 擊人喇.
> 現在已成定局, 希望板主可將部份多餘(無聊)的意見刪去, 若板主自
> 己唔得閑, 可交由板助負責, 總希望該區能回復安寧. 我寧要那些無
> 聊的將九巴線cut給城巴的建議, 也不要那些'蝦片~'/'蝦條~', 打晒
> 個route list, 只係一個'bad'字等的有等於無的回覆. (最好就兩樣
> 都無)
>
> 另, 本人希望各板友響應: 自動自覺在路線建議意見上署名.
>
> Jess
睇番個投票結果啊，支持要署名的，都係一些比較成熟的板友，好
似智叔咁。
只不過係本板太多一些心智唔成熟的人啦，才會拉到個投票咁，
小弟而經響應左Jess兄的建議，在建議欄才署名，希望其他板友
可以跟隨啦。
人生在世，唔係可以一直遊戲人生的。
Article 9: (Request 1)
NV58 (tin.wong@kcl.ac.uk) said:
> '平生不作虧心事, 夜半敲門也未惊', 怕什麼被人報復呢?
> 只要我們的意見不是無的放矢。
>
> 大家自律才是最重要。
>
> 希望BDB回复平靜...
我都係唔明點解咁多人話驚俾人炸電郵? 要炸, 唔駛單靠路線建議欄啦,
淨係因為討論區 D 文都可以炸架. 如果唔係自己鬧人在先, 又駛乜怕?
不如諗下自己俾意見時係鬧人定鬧個建議.
先撩者賤, 打死無怨o既.
---
本月金句：獨沽一味，做好自己
Article 9: (Request 2)
問題係無論你理直定理虧都好,人地唔滿意都可以炸你0架!
就算你唔撩人,有時意見不合比人炸,莫非又打死無怨?
衰在我電腦見識淺薄,如是在街外,真係要睇下邊個打死邊個...
鮑魚
Article 10:
Re: LM1, DM1, DS20, ML2,你0地0係邊度呀?
LM3,ATR3,333 (angela05@netvigator.com) from 203.80.97.221 at Thu Jan 28 19:36, 1999 said:
> 古競豪 (fatku@school.net.hk) said:
> 如題, thanks!
>
> 小弟想坐!
>
> 本月金句:珍寶入四波 人人笑呵呵!
> (此乃小弟第一首金句 :P)
DM1 sometimes at 4 or 91
Article 10: (Request 1)
> DR4834 (h9810424@hkusua.hku.hk) said:
> LM1仲健在 行緊23添
>
> 終於貢獻一下討論區的問題少年DR4834
Today I saw DS20 in 82.
Hope I can help you.
I seldom see DS20 go to 104 at peak hour la.
It's the schledue bus of 82.
Article 11:
Re: 新記豪幾答
James 1016 (kwokcj@hknet.com) from 202.67.217.167 at Thu Jan 28 17:59, 1999 said:
> 炎邪火月 (hsbt@netvigator.com) said:
> 新記重有幾多架銀豪呢？
應該有VA53, VA55, VA59, VA63囉, 其中VA55上左Banner
> 邊幾架上左新記色呢？
VA54係第一架, 跟住有VA57, VA61等
> VA51/52/56重係咪白色加藍線呢？
VA52, VA56好似仲係
> 呀重有，以上所有車係邊條線出現呢？
VA54, VA55, VA57, VA59, VA61, VA63都係970掛牌
> p.s.970近排多左DA+舊VA，調左部份銀豪走。
會唔會年驗或者翻油呢?
> 今日過海坐正DL行112的
> 炎之化身-----羅剎‧炎邪火月
112仲有DL? 係咪打仗車咋? 印象中112已經全冷喎 (卡佬講咋...)
James (新巴1016, 112十一車)
Article 11: (Request 1)
VA57都上左新巴色
Article 11: (Request 2)
> 應該有VA53, VA55, VA59, VA63囉, 其中VA55上左Banner
據我今日所見，VA63已經被翻髹新巴色了。
(該部車今日行走23號線。)
> VA54係第一架, 跟住有VA57, VA61等
還有VA60。
Article 12:
Re: 雙方分段收費系統？
雞雞敵人LF243 (tangeric@netvigator.com) from 208.139.118.212 at Thu Jan 28 16:45, 1999 said:
> Bruce Li (bruceli@vcn.bc.ca) said:
> '城巴董事總經理李日新昨日在同一場合上表示﹐目前正與負責
> 八達通系統的聯俊達緊密合作﹐加快在行走六條赤柱路線(分別是
> 6﹑6A﹑ 6X﹑61﹑73﹑260)的巴士上﹐裝置雙方分段收費形式的
> 八達通系統﹐預算數周後完成。'
> (明報 1999.1.28)
>
> 想知道什麼是”雙方分段收費形式的八達通系統”呀？
即係291A siu所建議的系統囉!
不過將飛入錢的方式改為八仔机.
(應該類似輕鐵的收費方式)
所以話呢, 要大膽創新, 世界才會有進步!
Article 12: (Request 1)
其實CTB291講的是否八爪魚呢?
NV58
Making bus fare simple
Article 12: (Request 2)
部車上有兩部八爪魚，一部「上車」，一部「落車」，由司傅控制
收費區。乘客就好似坐LRT咁......上車拍一下「上車機」，落車拍
一下「下車機」，如果過了某一段時間（例如90分鐘），就扣全費。
舉例：
260
在中環，司機就set個「收費區」為中環，但到淺水灣，個司機就
set個「收費區」為淺水灣，在上車時將上車的「收費區」記綠在卡
上，落車就對返「收費區」收費。但過了某一段時間（例如90分鐘）
就好似LRT咁扣全費。
唔知得唔得呢？
小小
Article 13:
A43 準備就緒
GZ5818 (kytse1@netvigator.com) from 208.139.120.145 at Thu Jan 28 19:45, 1999 said:
28/1/1999 下午六時 ,
在上水已有 A43 站牌 , 上水火車站如下 :
<-- 行車方向 ( 巴士站 Bus stop )
--------------------------------------------------------
!錦/A43 往機場 ! 270/70K/77K ! 270/276P !A43 往華明
( 上水 火車站 )
而上水廣場亦有分站 , 於 373/373P/270A 那個位置(70 後面)
A43 將行經 : 欣盛苑 , 牽晴間 , 祥華 , 粉嶺火車站
粉嶺泳池 , 上水火車站 , 上水廣場/中心
(無寫停大欖轉車站)
全程收費 $28 , 上水至華明 $ 7
而 A43 用 lance 操車 , 是否意味 A43 用 行走?
不過 Lance 好似甚少行長途線 , 有無人知 lance 極速幾多?
若 lance 快過 Trident 而 A43 又只用 lance ,
lance 車速高便成了唯一的安慰 .
我對 lance 沒有好感 , 眼看 273A 的 lance ,
停車後, 總是震震 , 而冷氣又不足 ,
Lance 若行 A43 又收豪華巴費 $28 , 唉 ....
北區居民
GZ5818
Article 13: (Request 1)
> Sixty (wong5399@netvigator.com) said:
> 請問通告上有冇班次時間表??(因據聞是1小時1班)
> 如果有,是抵站時間(即站站不同)還是總站開出時間??
有各班總站開出時間 , 45 -60 分 .
70X 網頁 , 有 A43 時間表
GZ5818
Article 14:
Re: 喚醒港人,什麼是巴士迷!!
S3M224 (remusmok@asiaonline.cityu.edu.hk) from 202.85.58.229 at Thu Jan 28 22:14, 1999 said:
> 金魚 (n960@hkabc.net) said:
> 今日,我在良景站影相,突然有幾個唔識的人走埋黎講:
> 影相呀
> 我答:係呀
> 佢又講:你好鍾意巴士架??
> 我冇答佢,因為我覺得唔駛答佢,如果唔係巴士迷做咩會係
> 巴士站左影又影,如果係記者,都有相機袋,但係我冇拎相機袋
> 唔通我用記者身份來影成十幾張巴士相咩
點解唔駛答?人o地善意問你係咪好鍾意巴士之嘛...
問你o野又唔答人,人o地覺得你無禮貌就真.
咁算唔算影響巴士迷形象?
Article 14: (Request 1)
乜真係有需要知道咩?
如喜歡巴士只是作一種'試好' ,根本不存在有冇用的問題.
可能打左架你都未必知喎.....
網上罵戰....
錦田肥 pau? 事件
世界會superbus 攪賣相, 結果大罵戰收場...
你話巴士迷一定唔會打架....聽住先啦...
其實最緊要係做好自己.....
係為左自己的興趣之餘,不影響他人.....
仲有,就係注意自己的言論../..
例如....之前有人追話過屯中客不上60x,要上58x,
又話58x只係服務良景,建生.....
咁冇斷o既言論,比公眾見到,
唔睇衰巴士迷就奇囉...
Article 14: (Request 2)
好難講, 我已經開始唔睇好巴士迷 (雖然我自己都係). 總覺得
遲早有一日, '新', '九', '城', 甚至'中'既fans會打起上黎...
甚至影車時會有人走埋黎問 '喂! 你邊間架? 黎我地車站 (摩頓台,
石澳, 尖沙咀碼頭等) 影車? 你未死過呀?!'.
所以我而家仍然係我有我影車, 絕少有人陪我既...
各位, 記住唔好失禮巴士迷啊...
灰心既 Ken
Article 15:
Re: 【問】怎樣可以影到A43
GZ5818 (kytse1@netvigator.com) from 208.139.117.147 at Thu Jan 28 21:48, 1999 said:
> ATR2 (dwschiu@i-wave.net) said:
> 小弟想在本週六(即A43服務的第一天)去影她﹐
> 請問哪裡才是最適合的的方呢﹖ (角度靚)
>
> 謝謝解答﹗
>
> ATR2
A43 華明總站 , 上水廣場巴士站轉入/出來的彎位.
GZ5818
Article 16:
[廣告]HKBVS投票題目更新
豐巴 (simong@netvigator.com) from 208.167.246.166 at Thu Jan 28 21:19, 1999 said:
今次的題目是:邊度最需要往機場巴士服務
現時有以下選擇:
港島東區
港島南區
將軍澳
新界北區
你也可加入其他地區,但請盡量以英文填寫,多謝合作!
請在此進入香港巴士投票區
Article 16: (Request 1)
新界北區已有巴士去機場了!
Article 17:
Re: 問巴士模型資料 (麻煩多一次!)
D890 (tonmic@netvigator.com) from 208.151.89.209 at Thu Jan 28 19:32, 1999 said:
> BR4474 (c6091596@comp.polyu.edu.hk) said:
> 請問以下巴士的發行量及 stock number 呢?
>
> 九廣鐵路 222 (普通版)
> 九廣鐵路 222 (十週年版)
> 城巴 2118 (香港版)
> 城巴 2118 (英國版)
> 九巴兔年 1999 (另外呢架車個車牌係乜?)
不如你去以下網頁 http://www.users.fl.net.au/~iwong/model.html
它會幫倒你!!
Article 18:
Re: 雙向分段問題
James 1016 (kwokcj@hknet.com) from 202.67.217.167 at Thu Jan 28 18:06, 1999 said:
> S3M94 (matt4127@netteens.net) said:
> 今日生果日報講城巴有6條赤柱路線因採用下車收費需要特別軟件設計.
> 要到年中才會安裝八達通......
乜話? 年中先有八仔? 咁我聽日去赤柱旅行點算?
> 乜城巴有路線係下車才入錢架咩?雙向分段唔係上車入錢架?
6系, 61, 73, 260去赤柱方向係落車俾錢, 我諗佢會方便D計數掛.
有趣p既係, 由赤柱出淺水灣/中環係上車俾錢.
> 希望套雙向分段八達通軟件能夠安裝在九記53,72A,76K,77K,203等路線,
> 方便市民啦!
當然最好啦, 最好70都有雙向分段.
聽日要搭城巴6系車入赤柱旅行, 不過搭63走o既James (新巴1016, 112十一車)
Article 19:
九巴呃$$$...............
89X比卡超 (lmc03444@lmc.hkcampus.net) from 202.77.5.139 at Thu Jan 28 17:20, 1999 said:
九巴新出的兩款模型(Rt.300 Trident and Rt.80M Olympian),真有呃錢之嫌,又不限量,卻賣限量版價錢(Rt.300 $288 Rt.80M $278),城巴A21模型都不限量啦,賣below$200咋!
Trident 還可以接受,都有D真實感,但那款80M就...........80M都不能用11米,Volvo Olympian A/C上車位旁有KMB標誌,空調sticker就不會貼在側牌上,總之...................都係買VA60,SBS先喇!!
Article 19: (Request 1)
> 89X比卡超 (lmc03444@lmc.hkcampus.net) said:
> 九巴新出的兩款模型(Rt.300 Trident and Rt.80M Olympian),真有呃錢之嫌,又不限量,卻賣限量版價錢
(Rt.300 $288 Rt.80M $278),城巴A21模型都不限量啦,賣below$200咋!
A21 唔駛$200﹖請問在邊道買呢﹖
> Trident 還可以接受,都有D真實感,但那款80M就...........80M都不能用11米,Volvo Olympian A/C
車位旁有KMB標誌,空調sticker就不會貼在側牌上,總之...................都係買VA60,SBS先喇!!
這點我也同意。
ATR2
Article 20:
問車牌?
72x (hangk@netvigator.com) from 203.80.115.24 at Thu Jan 28 16:58, 1999 said:
citybus: 2214 ,2231
nwfb:1130 ,3025,3027,3030
1130,
kmb: ATR86,87,88,89,90,91.
ADS187.
thanks
Article 20: (Request 1)
ATR86: HY8728
ATR87: HY8958
ATR88: HY9110
ATR89: HY9447
ATR90: HY9885
以上均為 26 線掛牌.
Ricky Chan
Article 21:
新巴鼓勵人答非區內線?
Y. F. Yiu (sjs84409@sjs.hkcampus.net) from 202.40.137.110 at Thu Jan 28 16:42, 1999 said:
新巴8號有個空調分段由柴灣道至小西灣 $3.20, 不過82, 83, 84
加冷氣價錢時就冇o左呢個分段, 正常o黎講應該區內線收平o的
(或者一樣) 去鼓勵人去搭至係, 點解o依家搞到好似叫長命斜返
入柴灣的人搭8號, 而唔係82, 83 同 84?
Article 21: (Request 1)
I have just checked NWFB's Web Page, there exists A/C
section fare on 82, from chai Wan Rd to chai wan (E) is $3.20
however, no section fares on 83 & 84.
Article 22:
Re: 'Earn bus points'?
100/911R/M1 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) from 208.167.245.51 at Thu Jan 28 20:45, 1999 said:
> Cityflyer A23 (cpitech@netvigator.com) said:
> In the latest issue of 'busses' (February), there was an article about
> Stagecoach busses regarding MAN with ALX 300 body in Oxford.
> On the front screen you can see banners with 'Earn bus points', so my
> question, what are bus points?
> What is the reward?
> Will Stagecoach also introduce bus points in Hong Kong?
> And will we get Corgi models, free Cityflyer rides or Park'n Shop
> voucher as rewards????
>
I read an article regarding bus points in Britain.
It stated since 1st Bus and Stagecoach are competing with each
other, each has introduced 'bus points' as rewards for
'frequent travel service'. Rewards range from non-peak hours
discounts to coupons at 'M&S' Department Store, or tickets
to museum or something.
That's all I know, and sure wish such program will be introduced
in Hong Kong as well.
100/911R/M1 Wong
Article 23:
Re: 港島塞巴士原廠又關九巴事？
NV58 (tin.wong@kcl.ac.uk) from 137.73.180.142 at Thu Jan 28 10:48, 1999 said:
> CMB337 (cmb337@netvigator.com) said:
> 頭先睇西方日報話據一巴士公司自己進
> 行的調查發現，繁忙時間於旺區做成擠
> 塞的巴士公司，竟然唔係新巴同城巴，
> 竟然係九巴。呢個結果可謂令人摸不著
> 頭腦，當你0係英皇道成日見到三架8X
> 一齊埋站、兩架８號一齊行，十分鐘都
> 見唔到架691，咁島可以賴得落噓九巴
> 到0既，就真係倍服倍服囉。
>
> 標題應該係港島塞巴士 又關九巴事至真
> 不便之處，敬請原諒。
邊間巴士公司做咖?
NV58
Making London simple
Article 24:
Question in Neoplan Skyliner.
Samuel C (scheung@charon.com) from 204.225.189.3 at Thu Jan 28 22:06, 1999 said:
I am just wondering, there were a
individual bus company named Hong Kong Bus.
And they used to have a bunch
of '2nd Handed'(used) Neoplan Skyliner(s),
can anyone tell me if both the company/buses
still exist?
I just want to have some updates.
On the other hand, are those Neoplan Centroliner
in service yet, what is the spec of this bus?
such as Engine, seating...etc.
Thanks for you help!
Samuel C in Canada
Article 25:
'遊' 尚德 往 上水
阿域 (dart@netvigator.com) from 208.167.247.225 at Thu Jan 28 22:06, 1999 said:
由尚德去上水, 以下邊條線值得搭?
尚德 -296A-> 觀塘 -70X-> 上水
尚德 -296D-> 佐碼 -70-> 上水
你會點揀, 及請列明原因
今日 lunch time o係荔枝角道見到一架滿載 A43 站牌o既龍運貨車o既
eriC
Article 26:
Now it seems a bit more fair...
100/911R/M1 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) from 208.167.245.51 at Thu Jan 28 22:03, 1999 said:
Not too long ago I was complaining about the unfair fares for
me from Tsim Sha Tsui to Tsim Sha Tsui East, and in case some
of you might forget, here is the fare structure:
203/208: $4.2 (but slow as they via Star Ferry with super high
floor buses)
35A/41A: $4.2 (fast and direct service with economy fares)
26: $4.7 (pay more but need to via Star Ferry as well)
98D: $5.2 (the most expensive direct route)
However, since ATR's were introduced on 26 and 98D, the story
sure has changed a bit...
Pay $0.5 more for ATR's on 26, as though the trip is slow by
via Star Ferry, you get to enjoy Trident more!
Or pay $1 more for FAST ATR service to Tsim Sha Tsui East on
98D.
Now I think the premium being charged is worth it!
100/911R/M1 Wong
Article 27:
A43,上!
doremefasolatedo' (s967679@logic.csc.cuhk.edu.hk) from 137.189.4.8 at Thu Jan 28 21:57, 1999 said:
A43 華明至機場
點行法?
華明,碧湖,粉嶺中心,火車站,粉嶺泳池,上水火車站,三幹直去機場
有幾密?
45-60(好過預期中)
時間:
華明開:
0530 0615 0700 0800 0845 0930 1015 1115 1200 1245 1330 1430
1515 1600 1645 1745 1830 1915 2000 2100 2145 2230
機場開:
0710 0755 0840 0940 1025 1110 1210 1255 1340 1425 1510 1610
1655 1740 1825 1925 2010 2055 2140 2240 2320 0000
車:
唔知,希望唔好係LANCE, 亦希望佢唔好搵普通版TRIDENT來當A車行.
報告完畢
讓我們向寶輪街方向作出禱告..
我們在地上的雷生,願你的九記為勝,願你的金躉光臨,願你的鴨行在
地上,如同在往車場路上
我們日用的水塘,日日賜給我們,免我們無散銀俾少幾毫子的債,
如同我們免你DELAY脫班罰企飛站頂閘中途跪低的債,不叫我們坐中
雞鴨,教我們如何脫離你的加價,因為九龍,新界,部份港島全是你的,直到2007
哈哈!
Article 28:
問龍運
GZ5818 (kytse1@netvigator.com) from 208.139.117.147 at Thu Jan 28 21:54, 1999 said:
請問龍運有多少部 lance ?
有多少部 lance 行 S 線 ?
S 線是否全用 lance ?
龍運有否 spare Trident , lance?
謝謝.
GZ5818
Article 29:
靚仔出現216M
Guy (guyleung@hkg.com) from 202.161.253.130 at Thu Jan 28 21:54, 1999 said:
K廠的靚仔Lance lee幾日都服務219X,216M
除了S62,還有什麼線呢????
Article 30:
昨天在屯公出事的60x 是那一部?
FP8329 (tky808@hkschool.net) from 203.80.126.38 at Thu Jan 28 21:45, 1999 said:
昨天在屯公出事的60x 是那一部?
Article 31:
解決德輔道中交通擠塞，搬電車站定巴士站？
417 (96006257@plink.cityu.edu.hk) from 205.252.144.9 at Thu Jan 28 22:22, 1999 said:
今日見有板友談及德輔道中的巴士路線問題，當中有云擠塞的元凶。
小弟有以下見解，希望與各位板友分享。
住o係西區o既板友，大概都知道現時干諾道中巴士專用線經常出現擠
塞，而呢種擠塞，更可以話係「來無蹤，去無影」。
雖然我未有做過科學o既分析或者調查，亦冇實質數據支持，但以個人
觀察，得出了下面結論。
1 號樽頸位--急庇利街、德輔道中、禧利街、干諾道中「迴旋處」
上面四條街形成o左一個迴旋處，如果迴旋處中任何一個「出口」出現
交通擠塞，咁進入呢個迴旋處o既任何一條路都會受影響，形成範圍更
大o既擠塞。
2, 3, 4 號樽頸位--德輔道中東行方向上的 3 個電車站
位於德輔道中、禧利街、機利文街和祖庇利街的 3 個電車站，分別
形成了另外 3 個樽頸位，因為車輛每當抵達電車站前，便要從兩線轉
為一線，變相由急庇利街至租庇利街一段德輔道中都是一線行車。於是
流量始終受限制，造成交通擠塞。
我認為如果要解決塞車問題，可考慮將禧利街的電車站移前到林士街，
取消機利文街一站，然後考慮將租庇利街的電車站南移一行。
另外，以往我覺得 905 改行干諾道中是不便的，但現在 905 卻在很
多時成為了我趕時間往中環的首選，因為行經干諾道中很多時可以避免
德輔道中的擠塞。因此，我認為可重提 1 號和 5A 合併的計劃，但以
不增加車費為先。路線如途經干諾道中，便可解決西環出中環除干諾道
中巴士專線外「無路可走」的困境。至於新巴的 18 號，則應考慮競爭
對手的策略，和自己的市場定位才決定「去向」。
--
417
每架久巴，都夢想成為一架身巴！
Article 32:
[傳情達意] 給前中記780(LA18)的車長
光大志揚 VA39 (98296437d@polyu.edu.hk) from 203.80.126.38 at Thu Jan 28 21:38, 1999 said:
[傳情達意] 給前中記780(LA18)的車長
大家記得前中記780(LA18) 那個好好人的車長嗎?
他會在本月底離職新巴.
如大家有意多謝佢 / 有話想同佢話說
歡迎post在這裡, Or Send E-mail to 98296437d@polyu.edu.hk
(在31/1/99 14:00 前)
各位請用中文, 因我會print一份給他.
仲有, 佢已不在某過海線了, 大家請不要在北角等他.
如大家想知多d佢近況, 請用icq contract 我. (My ICQ no:16837837)
不要在這兒討論佢d私事!
仲有, 如大家有話想同前中記780(DA74 & DA85)的車長說.
我也可以轉達給他們.
光大志揚 VA39
Article 33:
中巴牌布內容?
巴士佬 (wml201@ctimail.com) from 203.80.106.210 at Thu Jan 28 21:23, 1999 said:
各位版友,唔知有冇人知道中巴銀豪O個款牌布O既內容呢?如果有,可不可以POST出來呢? Thankyou.
Article 34:
城巴李日新:新巴引致交通擠塞
豐巴 (simong@netvigator.com) from 208.167.246.166 at Thu Jan 28 21:21, 1999 said:
今日生果日報有一報導,指城巴董事總經理李日新
不點名批評新巴沒有有效運用車隊,出車太多,引致
道路擠塞.他又指城巴每輛巴士每月平均載客量高過
新巴五千人次...
這篇報導又令我對城巴的印象進一步降低,每位住在東區的居民
都應該知道引致英皇道塞車並不是只得一間巴士公司所為,
何況加車最厲害,最不善用資源的又不是他.
試問平均載客量高些是否代表可以狂加車呢?
本人對李生的言論感到深切遺憾.
(隨後新巴反駁城巴只是在玩數字遊戲,兩巴車隊效益其實相約)
豐巴
Article 35:
Some 'unofficial' rules...(a joke!)
100/911R/M1 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) from 208.167.245.51 at Thu Jan 28 21:11, 1999 said:
Please do not take the following seriously and just have a
good laugh and enjoy....
I think there are some 'unofficial' rules regarding buses,
mostly in the Tsim Sha Tsui area...
1)No red van is allowed anyplace south of Jordan Road to Tsim
Sha Tsui, even though there is no sign anywhere regarding
'red vans prohibited'.
2)If any bus company wishes to provide bus service so passengers
can alight along Austin Road, the bus must be equipped with
a single door only! For examples:
A)GMB6
B)AEL free shuttle MAN (opposite of Nissan showroom)
C)973 (single door Olympian is used whenever there is a road
closure in Tsim Sha Tsui)
Since KMB uses buses with dual doors on 215X, 110, 35A, and
41A, so none of them can stop along Austin Road even during
road closure
3)As of Jan. 28 1999, all ATR's not crossing the harbour en
route on routes whole day terminating some place in Tsim Sha
Tsui. (and the word 'Tsim Sha Tsui' must be included somewhere
in the destination/terminus)
For examples:
1A/2: Tsim Sha Tsui Ferry (in Chinese)
271: Tsim Sha Tsui (Canton Road)
26/98D: Tsim Sha Tsui East
4)A rule for NWFB as of Jan. 28 1999, for every cross harbour
tunnel, there one route must remained full hotdog service,
even though road conditions allow.
For examples:
XHT: 113 (itself mostly uses 12m hotdogs)
EHC: 641 (same as above)
WHC: ? (need I say more? 914 lor!)
Again, please consider the above as a joke and have a good
laugh and some fun!
100/911R/M1 Wong
Article 36:
遲來的消息：新港城免費穿梭巴士服務
Gary&Carol (garycarol@ctimail.com) from 208.151.82.30 at Thu Jan 28 21:07, 1999 said:
來往 新港城 至各地 的穿梭巴士線
由 一月二十二日 起, 由七條減至五條
而 時間亦略有條改 (尾班車早左開)
受影響路線如下
錦英苑線 - 不變
沙田廣場線 - 服務時間更改為 10:30am - 8:00pm (以前尾車為9:00pm)
大圍線 - 不變
荃灣線 - 平日改為 11:00am - 7:20pm, 假日照常為 10:00am - 8:10pm
河畔花園線 - 不變
金獅花園 及 恒安村線 - 取消
Article 37:
[廣告]華人巴士線服務有限公司
華人 (ypy@hk.super.net) from 202.64.18.17 at Thu Jan 28 21:05, 1999 said:
小弟的最新製作~~
華人巴士線服務有限公司
請多多參觀.
製作人華人上
Article 38:
[相片] 真正利蘭老虎頭在此
C Ma (madc@bp.com) from 202.161.96.215 at Thu Jan 28 20:30, 1999 said:
有相為証!
有齊利蘭同老虎頭水牌, 仲唔係真?
同場加映利蘭豹一隻:
豹虎一出, 誰與爭鋒?
P.S. 豹虎的真面目可在Melbourne Bus Depot 看到.
Article 39:
DL5再現CMB
Panda LM8 (chan2468@netvigator.com) from 208.139.119.231 at Thu Jan 28 21:55, 1999 said:
DL5除o左胃藥banner廣告後再貼上新年banner但係留下了CMB字,個banner
只蓋了CMB字小小,情況同以前某幾架LM差不多,唔知有冇人看見呢.
可以話值得一影
Panda LM8假冷氣
Article 40:
致板主,各板友:改名啟事
89X比卡超 (lmc03444@lmc.hkcampus.net) from 202.77.28.155 at Thu Jan 28 18:55, 1999 said:
由於本人之署名大受劣評(在路線建議欄中更被人話as stupid as ......),所以,由下一篇文起,改名為[8X,上!]
Article 41:
新巴八達通安裝情況一問
Nicholas Louie (nichlas@netvigator.com) from 208.167.247.229 at Thu Jan 28 18:51, 1999 said:
今日見1032 (106)有一部寫壞機的八達通（唔止個架，仲有部機）
即係1032部八達通就用得喇
唔計1032，有邊部新巴裝左八達通機
您又想邊條線先有八達通
Nicholas Louie
ICQ UIN:15306525
Article 42:
967
Sam (s967762@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) from 137.189.170.233 at Thu Jan 28 18:28, 1999 said:
Some people say that CMB has applied for the route of 967,Wan Chai
to Siu Kong ,Is it true? and why this route is rejected by the transport
department as there is Siu Kong is the only place , no Western Crossing Bus
to Islands up to now?
Sam
Article 43:
to LF1:apologize letter(also boardmates)
101and968 (nancycha@netvigator.com) from 208.167.247.188 at Thu Jan 28 17:58, 1999 said:
LF1,I misunderstand you that I think that you've put $1.2
as $10 for the journey.Also I think that you help 'ox' to
pay the fee so I think you've put $1.2 as $10.
I haven't tell lies.Maybe my emotion is bad nowdays(always get upset-
like 'lau'ed by R.S. teacher today),so I typed such a silly
article on board.
Also I haven't mension your name as 'Siu Leung Kok'!
the name,101and968,is not my real name at all.
My real name is '968' only but it's used by someone.
'101' is a boy and '968' is another person.So don't type any Chinese
name,even got some'X' included.It's very rude!
Lastly,if you get uncomfortable with the article,sorry about that.But
please give me a response that why you type someone's name on board?
You can 'lau' me as '101and968',I accept;But I'm very angry to your response!
If you can,reply to me.
101and968-who's very sad to see such an impolite reply...
Article 44:
'$1.2' and '$10'
101and968 (nancycha@netvigator.com) from 208.167.247.188 at Thu Jan 28 16:49, 1999 said:
I think that you've seen the article:'boardmate 'LF...' ...'
The concept is from me.
LF1 is my good friend.He's little poor than me but he's a very kind
person.He consoles to me in school while I'm sad.
Use $1.2 to '$10' is a crime.I also know that.But I mension here:
'Don't let a bad image to LF1.I think that you also be angry
if you meet the same incident.'
He's a good student,really...
101and968
Article 45:
九巴banner消息
NWFB1010 (bonopun@chevalier.net) from 202.77.28.104 at Thu Jan 28 16:30, 1999 said:
有熱車上banner都幾核突 (是S3BL/S3V) 甘香米
BOSCH的T-BANNER開始多
63M有AD(好似是)上左白蘭氏燕窩廣告(幾有新年FEEL)
九巴兔年日曆卡出左啦(架車都幾好似虎年的格式)
架兔年巴士80M已經接受訂啦,價格不詳(是我無問)
Article 46:
KMB兔年巴士
Dennis Man (ctb26614@netteens.net) from 205.252.144.207 at Thu Jan 28 16:12, 1999 said:
Dennis Man
Article 47:
<今日剪報> 城巴與便利店合作
GW3430 (id00574@netvigator.com) from 208.139.117.187 at Thu Jan 28 13:00, 1999 said:
Article 48:
「你好砰」，你去左邊呀？
電腦王子 (shwong@chevalier.net) from 202.77.0.251 at Thu Jan 28 12:45, 1999 said:
我頭先o係屯廠裝嵌廠見到一部「你好砰」
比工程部托起o左，時間係1036，但因
冇相機跟身，飛奔返家採取行動，到左
1125返回現場並拍低兩張相，而車頭顯
示屏顯示’19 Demonstration’ ，下面仲有
個「紅1」黐o係玻璃，跟住架車可能見
到我即走，我想走去總修中心追佢，拍翻
張車身大相﹝聽聞輪蓋有’JUMBO’字樣﹞，
但已比呢部「你好砰」逃之夭夭。請問有冇
板友知佢去左邊？同輪蓋有’JUMBO’字樣係
唔係真有其事？唔該。
加入’BFSDU’一日o既電腦王子
ICQ:18857757
Article 49:
Is this why?
100/911R/M1 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) from 208.167.241.6 at Thu Jan 28 22:44, 1999 said:
Does the following reason explains why there is no bus route,
neither 'E'conomy nor 'A'ir, from Tseung Kwan O to the airport?
The crazy AA specified Long Win to serve districts in New Territories,
while CTB serves those in 'urban' Kowloon and Hong Kong.
Is Tseung Kwan O considered as Kowloon or New Territories?
It sure depends, though the government, who charges rent and
crown rates, considers SOME parts of Tseung Kwan O being south
of Boundary Street, hence considered as Kowloon, while some
other places are considered to be in New Territories.
A similar case caused residents of Tuen Mun residents still
have, (pretty much none in the future, since West Rail will
via Tin Shui Wai and Yuen Long first) no direct rail link to
Tsuen Wan, as MTR claimed since it has the rights to build rail
up to Tsuen Wan, it should build the rail to Tuen Mun. Vice
versa, KCR claimed since it has the rights to build railways
in New Territories, the link should be built by KCR. Since
they couldn't reach any compomise, poor Tuen Mun residents have
been suffering from traffic jams along Tuen Mun highway all
these years.
Of course, compromise had been reached, since MTR was able
to build the railway to the airport, hence KCR should be able
to build the West Rail.
Anyway, should there be a joint operation of a bus route from
Tsueng Kwan O to airport by Long Win and CTB?
100/911R/M1 Wong
Article 50:
旺角彌敦道改道新消息
大腦電波 (leungweb@cyber-x.com.hk) from 208.167.233.157 at Thu Jan 28 22:35, 1999 said:
彌 敦 道 封 路 一 段 三 月 南 行
原 南 行 線 封 閉 繼 續 渠 務 工 程
http://hk01.www.appledaily.com.hk/page/19990128/newr172.htm
改 道 示 意 圖 ( 留 意 彌 敦 道 南 行 兩 巴 士 站 改 設
在 路 中 央 )
Article 51:
【網頁廣告】昔日中巴更新及加相
CMB DA82 (da82@netvigator.com) from 158.132.14.5 at Thu Jan 28 22:28, 1999 said:
主頁相片更新為『590字軌--VA1』；
專題相片：新巴新廣告及大潭霸上，分別加相２張（受饑荒折磨的孩子 比你更急切）及４張；
資料庫加入新資料：86年5月中巴郊區路線表。
歡迎參觀！
昔日中巴網主,
DA82,HB8095.(W.T.Ho)
