香港巴士討論區舊文庫＜新版＞．: 20000314．

2000年3月14日文章

2000年3月14日文章(20000314)

本日文章總數:：79.

文章編碼: (20000314_01-79)

以下連結可直接看到每一篇主文章：

第1篇文第2篇文第3篇文第4篇文第5篇文第6篇文第7篇文第8篇文第9篇文第10篇文

第11篇文第12篇文第13篇文第14篇文第15篇文第16篇文第17篇文第18篇文第19篇文第20篇文

第21篇文第22篇文第23篇文第24篇文第25篇文第26篇文第27篇文第28篇文第29篇文第30篇文

第31篇文第32篇文第33篇文第34篇文第35篇文第36篇文第37篇文第38篇文第39篇文第40篇文

第41篇文第42篇文第43篇文第44篇文第45篇文第46篇文第47篇文第48篇文第49篇文第50篇文

第51篇文第52篇文第53篇文第54篇文第55篇文第56篇文第57篇文第58篇文第59篇文第60篇文

第61篇文第62篇文第63篇文第64篇文第65篇文第66篇文第67篇文第68篇文第69篇文第70篇文

第71篇文第72篇文第73篇文第74篇文第75篇文第76篇文第77篇文第78篇文第79篇文

50287-1

Article 1:

回應:

[01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10]

[11|12|13|14|15|16|17|18|19|20]

劃一分段收費

波子 (bentonco@ctimail3.com) at Tue Mar 14 16:02:40 CST 2000 said:
> 超奧再現720 (cotquean@netvigator.com) said:

> 撇除巴士迷自已的個人喜惡之後

> (例如有無金車的派車喜好)，

> 您認為九巴哪一些路線之服務，急需改善？

> eg.班次、票價......等等

> 請指出該線現時存在的問題，並提出改善建議。

> 謝謝！

我好希望在各地方劃一分段收費，例如所有太子去尖碼的

巴士都是$3.0/$4.2(雖然$4.2仲係貴)，等我唔駛有1,1a

唔搭要等2,6,6a,9。

當然九記又大把理由唔會咁做

妙想天開的

波子

Article 1: (Request 1)

> 100/911R/M1/300/917 (wongj1@netvigator.com) said:

>

> I thought from Prince Edward section of Nathan Road

> towards Tsim Sha Tsui Star Ferry the fare for 1/1A is

> indeed $4.2, just like 2/6/6A.

>

> Though I think if 35A/41A charge $4.2 for going

> to Tsim Sha Tsui, why 81C/87D/281A/271 charge $5.2?

>

> 100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

小弟只等三蚊的熱  嘛。可以叫幾飛時我就$3.5都唔俾。

如果$4.2，我不如搭地龍八仔價$4.5。

我真是試過很多次在聯合門口讓一架又一架冷6、冷6a、

203走而唔上  ！

至於上述四線，我也覺得超搵笨；不過其實這情況也很普遍。

波子

Article 1: (Request 2)

> 100/911R/M1/300/917 (wongj1@netvigator.com) said:

>

> But seats are almost guaranteed on buses while

> only standing space is available for the underground

> transportation! (plus one has to walk all those

> stairs!)

True for 203, false for 6,6a during after office hours (sitting room not guaranteed until maybe Yau Ma Tei/Jordan)

> Can you take B1 during its hours?

No, as above

>

> The worse is 215X from Tsim Sha Tsui East charging

> $6.2 (full fare!) to Tsim Sha Tsui Star Ferry/China

> Harbour City/Kowloon MTR!

>

No doubt on this one

>

> 100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

Pochi

Article 1: (Request 3)

> 野比大雄 ‧ 荃葵德武帝 (busstop@netvigator.com) said:

>

> I think no one expect passengers will take 215X from

> TST East to TST West, because there are plenty of

> routes like 5, 5A, 5C, 110, etc.

No one expects? I suggest you go to Tsim Sha Tsui

East (Chatham Road South) and observe if there is

any passenger boarding on a bus of 215X!

>

> I know you will argue that 110 is not frequent,

> but it's frequency is not too low.

Can 110 go to Kowloon MTR? Does everyone know

how to take AEL K4 instead? (when the frequency is

indeed 20 minutes!)

Why not 'utilize' the resouces of 215X, as when buses

reaching Tsim Sha Tsui East from Lam Tin would be

mostly empty already, and pick up some passengers

so they don't have to wait for 5/28/K4?

Indeed, think about how 215X can serve as a good

'connetion route' for those who wants to take MTR

to Tsing Yi from Tsim Sha Tsui East?

Can't believe someone would oppose additional

sectional fares!

100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

Article 1: (Request 4)

> No one expects? I suggest you go to Tsim Sha Tsui

> East (Chatham Road South) and observe if there is

> any passenger boarding on a bus of 215X!

>

It is because only 215X or 110 is going to HK China Ferry. 5/28 is not a choice!

> Can 110 go to Kowloon MTR? Does everyone know

> how to take AEL K4 instead? (when the frequency is

> indeed 20 minutes!)

110 freuency? Inacceptable! I will not wait over 15 min for a bus.

>

> Why not 'utilize' the resouces of 215X, as when buses

> reaching Tsim Sha Tsui East from Lam Tin would be

> mostly empty already, and pick up some passengers

> so they don't have to wait for 5/28/K4?

>

> Indeed, think about how 215X can serve as a good

> 'connetion route' for those who wants to take MTR

> to Tsing Yi from Tsim Sha Tsui East?

>

> Can't believe someone would oppose additional

> sectional fares!

It is not only 215X, but also 5C (Hunghom Station to TST), 11X,K (from Ma Tau Wai), ...

If oppose sectional fare, then KMB should charge 8.90 for X-harbour routes after crossing the harbour.

Article 1: (Request 5)

俾你做巴士公司，有客就幾密都得啦，冇客就要咁密做乜

? 巴士公司嫌錢腥?

N357

Article 1: (Request 6)

> PTC (king@ust.hk) said:

>

> 講開又講,點解9號冷馬由坪石開出一個站就整分段呢?

> 差四毫子喎!有D分段不過差一毫,真係想知點解9號唔

> 一開出就收$4.3,乘機宣傳話減價益街坊嘛.

>

> PTC

這是前13號收費也.

Article 1: (Request 7)

> 5C16BSHL (rat@i-cable.com) said:

> 應該改善舊冷氣巴的車廂環境,egAD,AL,將D 換上2+2,

> D燈用無間斷式.

讚成！不過九巴連全冷都未做到，更莫論翻新現有的空調車了......

Article 1: (Request 8)

> 超奧再現720 (cotquean@netvigator.com) said:

>

> 讚成！不過九巴連全冷都未做到，

> 更莫論翻新現有的空調車了......

正如 Stanley Yung 板友之言，只顧急進而不顧

及成本效益的結果一定是蝕死，循序漸進是最好

的。

但似乎有些人不僅不理會人家的成本效益，而且

要不斷批鬥這些公司，要殺之而後快，更在本板

製造混亂。

朕知道一人之力不能抵擋眾多滋事份子 (至少有

三個) ，希望大家共同維持本板秩序。

野比大雄 ‧ 荃葵德武帝

Article 1: (Request 9)

九巴 rt.41 should add air-con buses,and I don't mind

it is AL,AD or AV.

LV83.

Article 1: (Request 10)

> 100/911R/M1/300/917 (wongj1@netvigator.com) said:

>

> Increase frequency for routes with 'super heavy demand'

> like 6C/6F/68X/104/117/269B/269C/296/296C etc...

and 101,690,691,269D,5,8A,271,7,671....

>

> Reduce A/C fares for routes like 203/208, and provide

> sectional fare for 215X from Tsim Sha Tsui East to

> Kowloon MTR.

And sectional fare for nearly all routes.

Reduce A/C fares like the opposite of the harbour. 3.40 the minimum and 3.70 the maximum.

>

And 2+2 seating, No luggage rack for 271 busses, all busses older than 14 years has to be scrapped,

routes which KMB is not interested to run should be given back, 117, 606, 671, 70, 8, 5D, ...

> 100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

> who is having a day off...

Article 1: (Request 11)

> Nobita (busstop@netvigator.com) said:

>

> 6C is very frequent, still increase the frequency?

6C is one of the worst routes of KMB. Bus types: 3AD,3AV or should be scrapped Dennis 12m.

Frequency: Between 17.00-18.00 long queues in Ma Tau Wai, KMB still do not put extra busses.

Acceptable frequency:6C/6F every 5 min like CTB 25A/25C

KMB still cannot manage a Nathan road bus reorganisation for 6C: 1.Eaton hotel, 2.Post office, 3.Ning Po Street...

> OK, 2 minutes, and Tai Po Road, Nathan Road and

> Muhu Street will be blocked forever.

>

> 117? if KMB uses AM, the frequency will definitely

> be increased.

Why is KMB is not using AM? But instead reducing the frequency?

>

>

> That's a point. I agree with you, 203 and

> 208 should NOT charge as expensive as 238X.

> coz 203 and 208 don't go to Tsuen Wan S :P

And 4.70 for 6C is also expensive.

CTB charges only 3.40 for #10 and NWFB 3.70 for #2.

Article 1: (Request 12)

> 野比大雄 ‧ 荃葵德武帝 (busstop@netvigator.com) said:

>

> Do you know 6C has a frequency of 5 minutes at

> peak hours?

I do not know that 6C has a frequency of 5 min. But I know for sure that I have to wait more than 10 min until a bus arrives (During peak hours at 17.00-18.00). I work in To Kwa Wan, and I see this scene every day! Plus the doing-nothing-KMB staff with with walkie-talkie.

>

> Do you know even 6C has a frequency of 5 minutes

> there are still long queues along the stations?

>

There are long queues simply no bus. But it is heavy demand, I admit.

> Do you know if KMB charges like CTB and NWFB a

> loss will result?

So CTB/NWFB are making losses??? Who said this???

>

> I think you DEFINITELY DON'T KNOW.

> So please think TWICE OR MORE before expressing

> your 'views'.

Why should I do not know. The only bright spot with acceptable frequency & busses in To Kwa Wan is 796X. Thank you loss-making NWFB.

Article 1: (Request 13)

> I do not know that 6C has a frequency of 5 min. But I know for sure that I have to wait more than 10 min until a bus arrives (During peak hours at 17.00-18.00). I work in To Kwa Wan, and I see this scene every day! Plus the doing-nothing-KMB staff with with walkie-talkie.

會唔會係交通擠塞 o既問題?

交通擠塞就算加車都冇用個喎,

只有越加越塞.

> So CTB/NWFB are making losses??? Who said this???

哈, 乜你唔知城巴 98 年蝕 o左四千四百萬咩?

--

車匙!

Article 1: (Request 14)

> 100/911R/M1/300/917 (wongj1@netvigator.com) said:

>

> Why? Because the bus company spends so much money

> for TV ads?

How much can a bus company spend on such thing?

I think the advertisments of NWFB to the public

cost similar.

> Indeed, thanks to economies of scale, the larger

> the bus company, the average cost should be lower

> than that of smaller bus companies, since it can

> order parts in larger quantities in greater

> discounts.

Really? I just think some companies are

enlightened enough, but not wise enough on

spending money.

OK, I'm not going to start a quarrel.

Article 1: (Request 15)

> 超奧再現720 (cotquean@netvigator.com) said:

>

> 其實203/208應該以'下車付錢'的方式來設立分段收費！

So, do you think it really cost (given the bus

being used as well!) $7 from Tsim Sha Tsui to Kowloon

Tong? (when one only needs to pay $4.3 for a golden

bus on 7!)

100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

Article 1: (Request 16)

> 波子 (bentonco@ctimail3.com) said:

> 其實個人愚見，既然九記不會一下子全冷，就不如

> --班次疏的線either 全冷或全熱

> 1.就像100 Wong兄要搭42時，與其要等57-77分鐘一班冷  ，不如cut埋佢，讓各位死心。

Can't agree more!

>

> --班次密的就確實地半冷熱(如一冷一熱)

> 1.像1a,27那類，不妨這樣。起碼各婆婆要等熱  都只需等兩個字

> (不要無厘頭連續三冷，跟住兩熱)

> 2.其實像以前中記時代的606,914分時段也不錯，好以我以前在  魚涌返工住  山，放工時如有熱606($6.8)我就搭，冷($8.8) 就唔搭，皆因地龍也只是$8.1咋！

>

> 咁既提議，是否有點過份呢？

>

> 預  俾人非議的

> 波子

Well, let me cite you some examples:

For route 2A (you sure should know which side of

the harbour I'm referring to!), the A/C and non-A/C

bus allocation is indeed: 2 cold follow by 2 hot!

For 98D, especially during morning rush hours, one

can easily find '3 hot 3 cold' as the sequence!

(that's why I would refer those departures as 'megashuttle'

as one can treat all three buses as one departure!)

100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

Article 1: (Request 17)

我諗203幾年前係'豪華線'，又途經'上等人區'，

所以收到$7噤貴！今時唔同往日，九記好應該檢討

個收費制度。不過九巴壟斷九龍區巴士服務，一定

'啋你都傻'

Article 1: (Request 18)

> Cityflyer A29 (cpitech@netvigator.com) said:

>

> If HK$7 for AM than it should be 10.50 for golden bus.

金車只係普通冷馬,何解收$10.5?

Article 1: (Request 19)

金車豪華同先進過 AM

Article 1: (Request 20)

> 野比大雄 ‧ 荃葵德武帝 (busstop@netvigator.com) said:

>

> Nope.

>

> It shoulkd be:

> If 203, 208 use SLF buses charging $7 is

> reasonable.

Absolutely correct! Can be ALX 200, Dennis Dart...is o.k.!

50285-1

Article 2:

回應:

[01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10]

[11|12]

九巴將部份路線加上2字唔係多餘0既做法

馬鞍山之友HN7282 (t263524@ctimail.com) at Tue Mar 14 19:18:11 CST 2000 said:
> 鴨廠原居民FZ1978 (s361457@hkg.com) said:

> 你們認唔認同九巴將部份路線加上2字係唔係多餘0既做法呢?

>好似將軍澳0甘,點解尚德村0既296D,296C同296A要加上2字呢?

>我覺得0甘樣做法係好多餘.點解唔變為96D,96A同96C呢?佢家陣又唔係同其他路線重疊又唔係超特快線.為何要0甘做呢?歡迎討論.

> 鴨廠原居民FZ1978

> ICQ NO:53907868

小弟認為九記此舉不算多餘,其實無論加

甚麼數字/英文字都只係有一個目的----

方便乘客識別!況且一D有2字0既路線相信

都存在0左一段時間,如果依家要巴士公司

''改名''0米仲麻煩?!係0米先?

不過加0左2字0既路線個名又真係長0左D!

(e.g.:234X,286M,296C,........)

認清正貨,提防假冒!

馬鞍山之友

HN7282,上!

ICQ:45871364(請勿炸我!THX!)

Article 2: (Request 1)

我諗當初九巴加個2字無非都係想標榜開新線全線用冷氣車,

因為90年代好多新線都仍然係半冷半熱的.

到後來連半冷熱都全冷埋又唔使加個2字o既時侯,大家就開始

諗個2字仲有冇意思呢?(尤其係取消o左黃底紅字標示之後)

我都贊成296C同269C是但減一個2字會清楚過宜家,尤其是

大家都係用同一種車o既時候(記得之前一個用3AD,一個3AV o架)

如果係改,我贊成269C改做69C,因為69字頭有69M,69P,69X.

但96字頭得96R,完全同296字頭無關.大家覺得應唔應該寫信去

九巴度反映o下?

再問,點解新巴開線用79?字頭呢? 其實當初城記接管中記線,

都係用番同樣數字. 而九巴投得天水圍線之後,都係用番26?

字頭.如果話驚新記用番9?字頭會同港島線號碼相撞,不如

九巴天水圍線跟埋新記將軍澳線用76?字頭咪仲好?起碼到

天水圍新區(是101區嗎?)開線o個陣唔使諗字頭諗到頭痛,

反正新記都唔會用到76?呢個字頭的;

或者倒番轉新記跟九記用番29?字頭o丫.

我點都諗唔明點解九巴話總站名係運輸署訂o既,唔可以

隨便改,但點解路線號可以任得巴士公司自己編幾多號

就幾多號,乜可以咁求其o既咩?

真係唔係好明o既PTC

Article 2: (Request 2)

> 在269D的3ASV32 (jackyyng@netteens.net) said:

> ......

>

> 係都改 269C 先啦！

唔好意思,攪錯o左.原文已改.

PTC

Article 2: (Request 3)

路線加上 2 字頭絕對不是甚麼多餘的事。

如果只用兩位數字記巴士路線號，是不夠

九巴這麼多路線使用的，因此部份新線加

上 2 字，巴士路線的可編號範圍便增大了

一倍，而當然也是足夠的了。

另外，新線加上 2 字，代表它們一開始

便全以空調巴士行走，容易識別。

當然，數年後九巴全冷，那時新線可能不

用加上 2 字頭了。

而「超奧再現 720 」板友指容易混淆號

碼，我認為不然。即使把 269C 和 296C

改成 69C 和 96C ，乘客混淆的機會仍是

很高的，原因是他們乘車不帶眼睛。這不

是巴士公司或運輸署的錯啊。

野比大雄 ‧ 荃葵德武帝

P.S. 服務海濱七年的 AN 將被 ATS 取代?

Article 2: (Request 4)

尚德路線原本建議號碼是 297__ 的。但唔知點解開線時變了 296__

Article 2: (Request 5)

> 100/911R/M1/300/917 (wongj1@netvigator.com) said:

>

> Somehow I think there would be less confusion should

> the 'digits' are being reduced to 2.

>

> Why? Suppose both routes 81 and 18 do via Mongkok,

> do you think passengers would get them confused?

The real situation is 81 and 18 have 2 digits only

but (2)69C and (2)96C have 3 (4) digits. A digit

erased does not help a lot.

Also, if there are only 2 digits, there should not

be enough space for route numbering.

> However, if the routes become 281 and 218, passengers

> in their mind would only think about 2xx, thus might

> have a chance to get them confused.

But still not too greater than 81 and 18, right?

There is a great difference between 1 and 8.

> Yes, reducing route number with only 2 digits may or

> may not work. Though I can guarantee you many,

> especially those new to Hong Kong, do confuse about

> 11K and 11X at Hung Hom KCR.

So do them if 796M is compared with 796X.

Article 2: (Request 6)

K 字同 X 字太似了, 況且兩條線熱狗都係兩軸的

兩條線又擺埋隔離

Article 2: (Request 7)

> 100/911R/M1/300/917 (wongj1@netvigator.com) said:

>

> Suppose you delete the '2' for routes like 30X,

> 264M, 273, 273A, 285, 287K, etc..., what will happen?

>

> 100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

根本開新線用'2'字都係唔好，明係有64m就咪加264m啦

(純講  巴，不是成條線)

230x，仲駛講，梗係30p啦，3ad/av46兄都說p字被濫用

可能小弟的近視較嚴重，早幾日連69x也睇錯60x

講起呢個話題好多  講的

波子

Article 2: (Request 8)

> 超奧再現720 (cotquean@netvigator.com) said:

>

> 小弟對九龍區巴士線不太熟識，好太可能就係因為個2字....

>

> 好似269D,296D，大意少少都會睇錯，

>

> 而兩條線又真係差天共地！

>

> 總之個2字令我好煩！

>

> 平日巳經多  記，依家仲要記多個2字，

>

> 真係煩！煩！煩！

所以尚德線應全用「96」：

(KMB) 96A, 96C, 96D.

(NWFB) 96M, 96X.

遲些調景嶺應重用「90」：

90 - 坑口

90A - 牛頭角

90B - 又一村

將軍澳市中心用「97」：

97A - 牛頭角

97C - 荔枝角

若796M/X搬返將軍澳市中心，可改為

97D (796X)

97M (796M)

以上純屬個人意見。

在香港這彈丸之地，三個位的路線編號己好夠

（例：45A, 45B, 45M, 45X ....）

重有，唔好太複雜，最好字母一律係字首/字尾。

（例如：A41P，可否改叫A42？）

另外，天水圍區一樣好煩：

天中：269, 276系列

天瑞：69系列

天耀：64M （天慈唔計啦。難道63X算是天水圍線？）

不如改叫：

天中：69A(264M), 69B, 69C, 69D, 69E(276/276P)

69M(269M), 69X (69P)

天瑞天耀：64M(69M), 64A(64M), 64X(69X)

都只係幻想o者，D 編號用左多年，早己深入民心

，點改？

況且，對此混亂的亦只是區外人。

荔景南 45M

PS. 為何269系列獨缺269A？

Article 2: (Request 9)

運輸署及九巴編A41P不是一條路線

而是A41的附屬路線

A41P是不經公開競投的路線

同樣，下列路線只是附屬路線，

九巴46X(46P,46S)

九巴276(276P)

隧巴960(960P)

九巴87D(87X)

九巴80(80P)

九巴17(217P)

隧巴171(171P)

隧巴118(118P)

隧巴373(373P)

九巴85K(85P)

九巴86K(86P)

九巴83K(83S)

九巴82X(82P)

九巴63M(63P)

九巴58M(58P)

城巴72(72A)

........

Article 2: (Request 10)

> 九巴86K(86P)

86K的附屬路線是86s,而86P係86c的附屬路線

HA7883

Article 2: (Request 11)

叫第二個號碼亦不等於它是／不是附屬路線吧。總覺得現在巴士公司同運輸署濫用Ｐ字已經到了無可救藥的地步

Article 2: (Request 12)

本來2字代表豪華線,但今天全冷線日多的情況下,2字的代表性也就減少了.

50304-1

Article 3:

回應:

[01|02|03|04|05|06|07]

Re: 低地台巴士[討論]

100/911R/M1/300/917 (wongj1@netvigator.com) at Tue Mar 14 17:21:35 CST 2000 said:
> nwfb 3304L (rickycklee@ctimail3.com) said:

> 究竟低地台巴士有何作用?方便傷殘人士上車?未見過!

> 所謂'低地台'巴士是否多餘呢?巴士廠紛紛推出低地台巴士,看來只是跟風罷了.

> 請大家說說對低地台巴士的意見.THANKS!

May I assume you prefer super high floor buses

like those Isuzu JALMT112 of NLB and Mitsubishi

MK117 running on B1?

100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

Article 3: (Request 1)

> Gakei! (joskklee@deloitte.com.hk) said:

> 你是在答緊人 o地 o既提問,

> 還是在揶揄他?

>

> --

> 車匙!

>

That was a 'question' with a question mark in the

end, as I wasn't clear.

100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

Article 3: (Request 2)

> NWFB 740/740A (eg2346bc1@hcy.hkcampus.net) said:

>

> 如果放在一些冇乜傷殘人士的新區如9字頭路線,

> 就真是非常浪費,我覺得x巴只是用金巴來扎馬,對抗橙巴,

> 而非方便傷殘人士

>

> 反之,我就真係見過傷殘人士坐1A,60M,

> 所以,我認為行舊區的低地台巴士才有用(如城巴10)

>

> 城巴有樣抵讚,就係唔會某線霸哂低地台,

> 這是因為佢有跳飛機制度,

> 能在有限資源下公平地分配.

>

> 新巴都係抵讚,因為佢唔會只是放低地台落隧巴線,

> 會照顧一些中巴忽略的路線如14,66等等

點解九巴落低地台就係對抗新巴

而新巴用低地台就係為乘客服務,唔係對抗九巴?

Article 3: (Request 3)

城巴有樣唔抵讚,就係唔係全仕部SLF都有輪椅位

Article 3: (Request 4)

> LF1 (fleetline@ctimail3.com) said:

>

> 城巴的低地台巴士連斜板都冇，又

> 怎樣方便傷殘人士呢?

>

I do agree this company isn't correct by not installing

access ramps on these SLF buses.

Though which type of bus do you think those on wheelchairs

would have a harder time to board on? A SLF bus of

the yellow bus company or one of those AM type?

>

> 對巴士迷而言，這是一件好事。

> 但對傷殘人士而言，這並非是一件

> 好事了。試想如果你是傷殘人士，

> 你連幾時有低地台巴士都唔知既時

> 候，你又會不會去等呢。

>

True, that's why they should be available everywhere!

100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

Article 3: (Request 5)

低地台市區版22xx基本上是10 號最多的, 2277-2301 幾乎都是10 號的, 5B/70/72/90/92/97 只是很少數...

這是因為新巴大部份巴士都是低地台吧

Article 3: (Request 6)

> hk man (kon@ismart.net) said:

> 點解KMB 6號唔用金車,一來闊門

上車通常只開半邊

>,二來又低地台加快上落速度

會o既咩?我搭過架3ASV 68X,有個阿婆

行得極慢,但係又排第一喎,慢慢行入

中間先有位,如果係DRAGON/OLYM.,個

亞婆一定坐橫位

Article 3: (Request 7)

I agree to certain extend, though maybe the bus

company claims there are more elderly passengers

from So Uk. (including one of my grandanut)

In reality, 2 is more profitable than 6, since most

passengers on these routes only travel between

Tsim Sha Tsui and Mongkok, so 2 has faster turnover

rate than 6!

100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

50302-1

Article 4:

回應:

[01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08]

城巴???? 7351????

在269D的3ASV32 (jackyyng@netteens.net) at Tue Mar 14 23:21:02 CST 2000 said:
> NWFB 740/740A (eg2346bc1@hcy.hkcampus.net) said:

> 在清明重陽,都會有好多人去大帽山拜山,但九巴51就死板板,見有生意都唔加車做,結果使乘客苦侯,

> 所以,建議城巴開辦7351 大帽山--青衣機鐵站,

......

我無睇錯下話？ 7351 ？

城巴的電子牌咁好野可以玩四個數字？

......

> (注:7代表新城非港島線,3代表特別路線,非開玩笑也)

唔該你啦，兩個字頭拼埋有乜野意思呀？

一係就 351 ，一係就 751 。唔好咁搞啦！

嫌 D Number 唔夠亂咩？

Article 4: (Request 1)

> 在269D的3ASV32 (jackyyng@netteens.net) said:

> ......

> 我無睇錯下話？ 7351 ？

> 城巴的電子牌咁好野可以玩四個數字？

Of course, all of its buses being equipped with

'Lite Vision' electronic display sure can display

4 digits for route number, such as 690P/962P, etc...

You may take a look at those 10xx 11m Volvo Olympian

as examples.

>

> ......

> 唔該你啦，兩個字頭拼埋有乜野意思呀？

> 一係就 351 ，一係就 751 。唔好咁搞啦！

> 嫌 D Number 唔夠亂咩？

I sure do agree 7351 is meaningless, though I thought

the boardmate meant either 751 or 351, but not both.

Just my interpretation.

100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

Article 4: (Request 2)

城巴有非港島路線(機場路線例外)咩? 城巴有非港島路線係'7'字頭咩? 唔好成日立亂加個'7'字頭, 就話係城/新巴非港島路線先呀!

仲有, 何來會有4個數目字既路線? (注意, 淨係數目字)難道你開創先河?

Article 4: (Request 3)

我想請問：

大冒山係有墳場咩？點解會話有人去大冒山拜山呢？

大冒山有郊野公園，你如果話假日(星期日及公眾假期)行駛都可以，始終星期日有好多郊遊人士去大冒山燒烤。

仲有：條線派13XX或14XX行掂嗎？大冒山路面咁「九曲十八彎」，除非將巴士改裝啦，唔係既話架車會好快完喇。

~~~Tony(S3M61)~~~

我的巴士網頁

Article 4: (Request 4)

> 100/911R/M1/300/917 (wongj1@netvigator.com) said:

>

> So you mean a more powerful B6LE can't conquer

> Twisk Peak better than a Dart?

Of course can, but the problem is that the Bus will be worn very very soon after introduced. Frequent repair may appear and not economical.

>

> If the white bus company is already using Darts

> on 51, what's wrong for using 14xx?

Route Twist cannot use SLF buses as the slope is too deep for a low floor bus to ride without touching the ground.

Hope you can understand what I wrote.

Article 4: (Request 5)

> Of course can, but the problem is that the Bus will be worn very very soon after introduced. Frequent repair may appear and not economical.

However, I don't see how the existing Darts are doing

any better....

>

> Route Twist cannot use SLF buses as the slope is too deep for a low floor bus to ride without touching the ground.

> Hope you can understand what I wrote.

This I do understand.

100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

Article 4: (Request 6)

> NWFB 740/740A (eg2346bc1@hcy.hkcampus.net) said:

>

> 係響石,每逢有關節日都有好多人去

是否石崗？

怪唔得每次清明同重陽見到有好多乘客搭77K去元朗啦

而且都係手執鮮花祭品啦

咁樣點解唔延長去石崗呢？

不過有251M去石崗......

~~~Tony(S3M61)~~~

我的巴士網頁

Article 4: (Request 7)

> 是否石崗？

不是，嚮石近川龍的。

以北大帽山為北界的

野比大雄 ‧ 荃葵德武帝

Article 4: (Request 8)

> 西區攻略者- 5B (ronaldsamuel@ctimail.com) said:

>

> 51S 不行麼?!

新城的拜山線都係3字頭的

50317-1

Article 5:

回應:

[01|02|03|04|05|06|07]

Re: 請勿與車長談話.

新巴88線常客兼站長 (kintak@netteens.net) at Tue Mar 14 18:17:04 CST 2000 said:
> ~260之2700~ (raymond19@ctimail3.com) said:

> 近排放學坐88,今日去到杏花村,因有事要落車.

> 落到下層,見到有個學生坐導航位,並與車長交

> 談.我估他也是巴士迷,而他的說話令駕駛中的

> 車長哈哈大笑!!!(我聽唔到他說甚麼,因為聽緊

> discman)好彩到我落車都冇發生意外.

>

> 其實這樣做,係咪太過份呢?況且身為巴士迷應

> 知道這樣做是犯法的.平時坐導航位,小弟唔會

> 主動撩車長談話,因我知道有些車長對巴士迷的

> 印象不太好,二來又費時阻住車長駕駛.

>

> 其實如果遇著一個肯和你傾談的車長,你大可坐

> 到總站先至'八料',那豈不是更好嗎?萬一有意外

> 時,車長的茅頭一定是指向和他談話的人.

>

> 身為巴士迷,與車長談話,就係'知法犯法,罪加一

> 等.'大家認同嗎?

那個就是我!

「行車時請勿與車長談話」!

你說的話很有疑點!

1.我是在「停車時與車長談話」! 有何不妥? 難道你當我盲架? 雞'也母'咁大隻字我一定睇到!

2.我同車長講野好細聲, 停車講野唔洗好大聲, 因為車長唔係聾0既! 你坐上層聽CD又聽到我同車長大笑, 而且我地講0既只係新巴內幕, 你想知嗎? 聽車長吐苦水, 有乜好笑呀? 幸災樂禍? 我又唔係咁0既人! 當大家是朋友而已.而且, 笑0既唔係我, 係坐下層的婆婆、伯伯、嬸嬸、主婦們, 唔係我地.

Article 5: (Request 1)

究竟你係切詞詨辨，又或者係你不僅得貼紙上

面的內容？行車的意思，是包括埋停燈位、讓

線前等候，難道你認為這些地方司機是無需留

神？你談話的內容更令人側目，你知不知道你

談話內容已超出普通乘客和司機談話的範圍？

（我認為乘客「適當時候」問司機關於行程上

問題係適當的）。你這樣做，小則司機被人警

告、或失去工作外，嚴重也可以有人命上之損

失。另外，請閣下不要一廂情願以為巴士公司

是應該為巴士迷服務，什麼從司機收內幕料、

又或記者會必要遷就巴士迷之文章，給人家看

見只會被人冷笑，到頭來吃虧的只是你自己，

懇請閣下日後打文時三思吧。

Edward Hong

Article 5: (Request 2)

> 1.我是在「停車時與車長談話」! 有何不妥? 難道你當我盲架?

> 雞'也母'咁大隻字我一定睇到!

請勿使用態度惡劣之語氣回應,

如有再犯會被處分.

HKBDB Admin

Article 5: (Request 3)

我亦曾同車長談話,不過次次0都係個車長主動開聲,我未曾試過主動開聲。

P.S.:我不是鼓吹不法行為。

Ivan

Article 5: (Request 4)

> 陳亞木(馬亞木) (wilsonptchan@ctimail3.com) said:

> 雖然就唔係咁好，但係我成日都同D小巴佬討論小

> 巴D是非啦，又唔見有事？

到有事的時候便太遲了......

(唔知上面篇文算不算鼓吹非法行為?)

Article 5: (Request 5)

哦!我中午才乘搭81號,那位雞車車長與一名青年

談話,應該是親戚,因為講及家事。

其實他們談話也是想調劑駕車時的苦悶,大部份

車長都是等到車輛停定後才閒談,有講家事、調

車、公司政策、《全線大搜查》等,舊時還有談

《真情》。乘客問路,車長也需要回答,所以與車

長談話不算是什麼,唯一的是切勿令車長分心,

不過上述那位仁兄仁姐的確過份少少。

Article 5: (Request 6)

> 電腦王子 (shwong@chevalier.net) said:

>

> 請問表姐位同導航位即係邊個位置?

表妹位我就聽過。

兩者都係指司機位對面車閘以後的一排橫位。

Article 5: (Request 7)

點解會叫表姐 / 表妹位？

50323-1

Article 6:

回應:

[01|02|03|04|05|06|07]

Re: 低地台巴士問題

在 269D 的 3ASV32 (jackyyng@netteens.net) at Tue Mar 14 23:41:51 CST 2000 said:
> 284 (sheeron@hknet.com) said:

> 究竟低地台巴士在結構上可否做到以下各點:

> 1.短車(<10.6m)

已經有，新巴的超短矮躉十米三。

> 2.爬坡能力好

何謂爬坡能力好？

> 3.又可以有輪椅位

咁短，基本上做唔到輪椅位，唔係機械係配

搭唔到。

> 4.可在荃錦公路或東涌道上行走

不可能。呢兩條路行低地台實會擦到車陣。

加上路面環境不許可長車 (九米半或以上) 行走。

> 5. 以上限制不可影響載客量(ADS/ATS標準)

一定不可能。

> PS:為何新巴矮Trident不用9.9/10.45m車架,硬要從10.6m cut.

因為個車架係做唔到三軸盤，而家香港又一定要行

二軸盤。

Article 6: (Request 1)

> Gakei! (joskklee@deloitte.com.hk) said:

>

> 將油缸擺去樓梯底如何?

咦，咁又係一個辦法喎。

但係咁樣，個拱起左的輪蓋又點處置好？

ps: 咁咪即係一定只可發展躉？！

Article 6: (Request 2)

> 咦，咁又係一個辦法喎。

因為諗起富豪 B7L 個油缸是擺車輪上的,

仲要係三尖八角咁款就返輪拱 (總之唔係長方體).

> 但係咁樣，個拱起左的輪蓋又點處置好？

> ps: 咁咪即係一定只可發展躉？！

你估擺響左前輪上面得唔得 o丫 o拿 ?

--

車匙!

Article 6: (Request 3)

> 你估擺響左前輪上面得唔得 o丫 o拿 ?

我尋日欣賞過架超豪，樓梯底裝左好多喉管。

我諗就無乜位可以擺個十幾升的油缸啦。

Article 6: (Request 4)

> 284 (sheeron@hknet.com) said:

> 究竟低地台巴士在結構上可否做到以下各點:

> 1.短車(<10.6m)

> 2.爬坡能力好

> 3.又可以有輪椅位

> 4.可在荃錦公路或東涌道上行走

> 5. 以上限制不可影響載客量(ADS/ATS標準)

>

> PS:為何新巴矮Trident不用9.9/10.45m車架,硬要從10.6m cut.

>

邊個話新巴矮Trident係10.6M，佢係10.3M。仲有三軸Trident係無9.9/10.45m底盤，香港用唔到兩軸，法例限制，好似唔知過幾重就要用三軸，冷氣車一定過。10.3M

Trident1,2,3,5項都得。

1409 Trident

Article 6: (Request 5)

> 1409 Trident (aronkam@netteens.net) said:

>

> 邊個話新巴矮Trident係10.6M，佢係10.3M。

佢係話O係10.6M TRIDENT CUT 出來

Article 6: (Request 6)

> Bruce Li (bruceli@vcn.bc.ca) said:

>

> 4 應該都得, 我估10.3米上荃錦公路應冇問題, 但東涌

> 道用雙層就危險一點了.

>

> Bruce Li

荃錦公路是禁止長度逾十米的車輛行走，

所以即使是矮躉都不能進入荃錦公路。

Christopher

Article 6: (Request 7)

上荃錦公路要裝手動減速器和細尾牙。

1409 Trident

50331-1

Article 7:

回應:

[01|02|03|04|05]

Re: 以荃灣如心廣場為總站0既路線

馬鞍山之友HN7282 (t263524@ctimail.com) at Tue Mar 14 20:39:15 CST 2000 said:
> Jeffrey (ccwjeff@netteens.net) said:

> 本星期日起，

> 以下路線將改以荃灣如心廣場為總站:

> 33A, 40, 51, 53, 64M, 73X, 278X

> 以下路線將改以新荃灣碼頭為總站:

> 234A, 234B

>

> 相信由本星期日起，

> 圓墩圍0既荃灣碼頭舊站將停用。

>

> 以上資料已力求準確，

> 如有任何問題，請指正。

>

> Jeffrey

0甘43X呢?各板友們,知唔知43X搬去邊?

認清正貨,提防假冒!

馬鞍山之友

HN7282,上!

Article 7: (Request 1)

應該位置照舊。

咁講的話，我相信新總站係起來代替舊荃碼總而

唔係代替運輸中心。

個站咁細，又裝唔落咁多線，又取消唔到，又搬

唔總站 … …

Article 7: (Request 2)

我想問下用荃灣如心廣場 o既巴士離開總站後,

係咪一定要繞過新荃灣碼頭巴士總站,

先可以入大河道???

如果係, 碼頭夠唔夠坑俾巴士經過???

Article 7: (Request 3)

> KS (mhtchan@ctimail3.com) said:

>

> 我想問下用荃灣如心廣場 o既巴士離開總站後,

> 係咪一定要繞過新荃灣碼頭巴士總站,

> 先可以入大河道???

好似係要的，因為個出口劃左兩條虛界，而出口

又係向住入荃碼的路。

> 如果係, 碼頭夠唔夠坑俾巴士經過???

應該會留番條坑俾巴士過卦？

Article 7: (Request 4)

指正不必，但想問一問圓墩圍總站停用後如何

處理？

Article 7: (Request 5)

> 愛上914巴 (老陳) (chanmw11@hk.super.net) said:

>

> 請問荃灣如心廣場在何處 ?

荃灣新碼頭總站旁的白色建築物，在過楊屋道

燈位後第一個路口位轉左。

50325-1

Article 8:

回應:

[01|02|03]

269C夠用ATS咯

AD262--GR5386 (bad.guys.go.to.hell@i-cable.com) at Tue Mar 14 21:58:43 CST 2000 said:
> 九巴超豪68X (ip28@netvigator.com) said:

> 今日見到68X用264M字軌，ATSXX黎替字軌，而68X今日有三四加超豪，其餘同樣係AL,AD,3AD同3AV

>

> 九巴超豪68X

就算係 269C,每日五點半度都有一架 264M o既 ATS (多

數係 ATS27)埋天水圍換牌o黎替番轉啦。

AD262--GR5386

ICQ#51715169

Article 8: (Request 1)

> eric ching (bching@hk.super.net) said:

> 遲d可能全部68x都用ATS架啦

現在用超豪有好多班車都Full

如果用ATS咪俾人插到反轉???

Article 8: (Request 2)

你根據什麼作出如此的猜測?

Article 8: (Request 3)

唔出奇喎!!大家都係元朗廠,有時都會交換用

試過有一次用64M字軌GG9294

50310-1

Article 9:

回應:

[01|02|03|04]

Re: 三叉戟,超豪,Centraliner,MAN12m哪款好？

超豪檸少．DL48 (nichlas@netvigator.com) at Tue Mar 14 21:25:54 CST 2000 said:
> Felix LEUNG (felixleung@start3.com) said:

> 就題目中的四款車，你們可以考慮以下數點來談談你心目中哪款車最好？

> －速度感；

超豪同MAN差唔多，Trident普通，Centroliner唔駛講啦，

極差。

> －舒適度；

超豪（九巴）最正，各巴Trident及MAN第二，超豪（新巴）

第三，最差係Centroliner。

> －外型；

都普躉最正，超豪、山寨躉及MAN都幾好，最差係Centroliner。

> －爬坡能力；

咁唔駛講，最好係MAN 12M，其次係Trident，最差Centroliner。

超豪係一部部唔同的。

> －轉向靈活性；

MAN 12M最好，Centroliner第二，Trident同超豪都係差

唔多。

> －車廂設計；

超豪及MAN最好，DM躉第二，其他Trident及Centroliner最

差。

> －設計；

超豪、躉同MAN最好，Centroliner最差。

> －空調和通風系統；

上層：MAN最好，Centroliner、超豪最差。躉一般。

下層：超豪、躉同MAN最好，Centroliner最差

> －行車穩定性；

最好係MAN 12M，超豪同躉差唔多，最差都係Centroliner。

> －安全設備；

Centroliner最好，超豪同躉差唔多，最差係MAN 12M

> －性能表現．

MAN最好，Centroliner最差，但超豪同躉不能輕易評分。

超豪檸少．DL48

ICQ:53261307

Article 9: (Request 1)

> 就題目中的四款車，你們可以考慮以下數點來談談你心目中哪款車最好？

> －速度感；

差唔多

> －舒適度；

九巴的差唔多

城巴同新巴較差

> －外型；

都係差唔多

超豪的大銀幕就差少少

> －爬坡能力；

應該超豪較弱

> －轉向靈活性；

唔知

> －車廂設計；

都普較好

車頭較暗

而且冷氣槽做到去車頭

> －設計；

甚麼設計？

> －空調和通風系統；

基本上架架都係咁弱

> －行車穩定性；

躉較好

> －安全設備；

乜有分別的咩？

> －性能表現．

各有各好

Article 9: (Request 2)

> －速度感；

肯定係三叉戟

> －舒適度；

超奧最定、三叉戟最爽....各有各好

> －外型；

centroliner最型/超奧、三叉戟就較全統。

> －爬坡能力；

我諗MAN一定最勁！三叉戟次之、超奧最屎。

> －轉向靈活性；

非CENTROLINER莫屬啦，話曬尾軸多左一種有限度的

輔佐轉向功能，不過三叉戟巳經好靈活！

> －車廂設計；

我始鐘比較喜歡城巴城市版都普三叉戟的車廂佈局...

> －設計；

唔知

> －空調和通風系統；

差唔幾

> －行車穩定性；

超奧！

> －安全設備；

差唔幾

> －性能表現．

三叉戟好正。

Article 9: (Request 3)

唔係centraliner,係centroliner

Article 9: (Request 4)

> －速度感；MAN

> －舒適度；Centraliner and 超豪

> －外型；三叉戟,超豪,Centraliner

> －爬坡能力；MAN

> －轉向靈活性；Centraliner

> －車廂設計；Centraliner

> －設計；Centraliner,三叉戟,超豪,MAN12m

> －空調和通風系統；Centraliner,三叉戟,超豪,MAN12m

> －行車穩定性；Centraliner,三叉戟,超豪,MAN12m

> －安全設備；Centraliner,三叉戟,超豪,MAN12m

> －性能表現．MAN,Centraliner

50307-1

Article 10:

回應:

[01|02|03|04]

Re: [問路] 堅尼地城→上水

陳亞木(馬亞木) (wilsonptchan@ctimail3.com) at Tue Mar 14 18:35:50 CST 2000 said:
> LV33 (hhshhl@ctimail3.com) said:

> 我想問由堅尼地城(近巴士總站)去上水(翠麗花園)可以坐甚麼巴士?價錢?大約需時?

> 唔該!

>

> LV33

> LV33

如果你堅持搭巴士的話，可以在堅尼地成搭101到

九龍灣地鐵站，然後搭70x到上水。

陳亞木(馬亞木)

Article 10: (Request 1)

試下坐101,104往紅磡再轉火車往上水

之後轉270

101,104=$9.40

火車=$8.50(八達通)

270=$3.00

總共=$20.90

我建議你坐104喇，104應該快過101。

~~~Tony(S3M61)~~~

我的巴士網頁

Article 10: (Request 2)

101快定係104快係一個水晶球問題。

非常睇你的運氣

如果乜車都唔塞的，104最快

在一般情況下101,104,113分分鐘係113最快....

港島北尤其西環真係咁好住咩 ﹖....haha

成日會去彩園村的

叻霸佳

Article 10: (Request 3}

北街 - 紅頂(西旺線) -> 旺角火車站

旺角火車站 -KCR-> 上水

上水 -270-> 翠麗花園 (按︰認清頭牌寫住翠麗花園

小心去錯天平)

全程大約1小時15分，最快可以1個鐘內去到

Article 10: (Request 4}

可以坐904往旺角再轉火車往上水

之後轉270

904=$9.40

火車=$8.50(八達通)

270=$3.00

總共=$20.90

50292-1

Article 11:

回應:

[01|02|03]

[討論]當年中巴路線720.

LV83 CM2681 (an7@isicmail.com) at Tue Mar 14 15:21:25 CST 2000 said:
記得當年中巴路線720(西行),每當東隧入口塞車,

司機都喜歡從鯉景灣調頭,出返筲箕灣道由太古城上

東廊,尤其720下午時段西行,當東隧入口塞車,

必定改道,記得當年MB2,MB8,MB20都試過,

但這樣是否私自改路呢?歡迎討論!另有冇板友試過中巴路線720(西行)

改道由太古城上東廊呢?多多指教!

LV83^_^.

Article 11: (Request 1)

> 查篤撐 ‧ 查小欣 (cityflyer@i-cable.com) said:

> 這種「傳統」,流落到新巴時代。前年,新巴未將720

> 改革時,有幾位車長都喜歡採用上述路線行駛。但有

> 一個事實各下(甚至各位車長)一定要知-這樣行駛是

> 犯法的。

> 以前九巴102由筲箕灣開出後,有車長便立即上東廊直

> 至健威花園,最後因警察打擊才使這種行為消聲匿跡;

> 另外,我亦試過乘坐780由太古城往銅鑼灣,記得該位

> 車長是駕駛LA,當車子駛到維園彎位,該車長便立即向

> 高士威道下橋位下橋,經興發街左轉維園道駛回原本

> 路線,後來家祺便說這是非法改道的行為。

但D客沒有投訴,反而讚車長!

Article 11: (Request 2)

> 3AD170 (busy@netvigator.com) said:

> 本人大約三、四年前農曆大除夕時坐中巴N8線往筲箕灣，但是到了太康街時竟然轉入康祥街而不經鯉景灣，再返回太安街；而且當轉入康祥街時還駛上左邊行人路，真是很危險。

How about the 3 different routeings of tunnel buses 102, 103, 103, 170 before going into the tunnel towards Kln?

1.via Canel Road flyover

2.direct to tunnel through flyover

3.via Tonochy Road flyover and Hung Hing Road

Article 11: (Request 3}

It is not 非法改道!

LV83.

50286-1

Article 12:

回應:

[01|02|03|04]

Re: 問寶馬山客量及旱有徵相

~260之2700~ (raymond19@ctimail3.com) at Tue Mar 14 16:54:19 CST 2000 said:
> 超奧再現720 (cotquean@netvigator.com) said:

> 1)上下課時間，25,25A,25C客量誰勝誰負？

25C贏哂,因為25C係直出銅鑼灣,下午放學實頂閘.

25同25A就差唔多.

> 2)上課時間，81A有幾成滿及81S客量如何？

81A全冷後,去到北角就好多人上.

在張振興上81S就通常要企.

> 3)529P多客還是81S多客？

6:50的81S最多,第二係7:0的81S和6:55的529P.

最少人坐係6:55的529P.

> 4)徵求旱有照片：81S照片（任何車種）及81A近照一張

我有影81S和529P,但唔識post上網.

> 多謝！

u're welcome!

~260之2700~

Article 12: (Request 1)

> 1)上下課時間，25,25A,25C客量誰勝誰負？

係正下課時間，25A,25C都幾多人搭，

遇正放學人流既車會頂閘

(不過冇人行去車尾企，迫晒係中門

之前，所以即使頂閘都企左唔夠30人)

你肯俾貴D搭25的話，

肯定有位坐，25應該冇2/3滿，

可能因為收得貴。

>

108-ADS9

Article 12: (Request 2)

> 在張振興上81S就通常要企.

好似起環翠街市個站上都已經開始要企la bor.我地班geah Parry日日返學搭81S,起環翠上車,但次次都要企.

> 6:50的81S最多,第二係7:0的81S和6:55的529P.

> 最少人坐係6:55的529P.

印象中果班(6:55)529P得四至六成滿.

Article 12: (Request 3}

> 2)上下課時間，81A有幾成滿及81S客量如何？

下課時間係冇81A同81S ga bor

上課時間81S有用矮蠆,仲頂閘.直到張記門口我地d同學落左車後,架車先至有番d空位.另外今日我見到14xx行81S.

> 3)529P多客還是81S多客？

>

我平時見529P客量都冇81S kum多

> 多謝！

You are welcome

Article 12: (Request 4}

81A都頂閘嫁!

ML33

50316-1

Article 13:

回應:

[01|02|03|04]

將軍澳明年增四條巴士線

Y. F. Yiu (s9855066@student.ouhk.edu.hk) at Tue Mar 14 17:30:00 CST 2000 said:
For further information, please go to the website of CommunityStar

'此外，796X號路線將於今年十二月由現時終站紅磡碼頭延長至地鐵九

龍站，以方便尚德區居民往返機場及尖沙咀。由於796X路線延長，所以收費

亦會由六元八角增加至八元二角。'

First Bus said that she will conduct a survey on whether passengers support the extension or not, where's the research?

Article 13: (Request 1)

似乎路線 no. '96' 很受歡迎, 但好易造成混亂喎, 九巴有 296, 296A, 296C,296D, 新巴就有/就黎有 796,796A, 796B, 796C, 796M, 796X, 咁多 '96', 點解唔叫其他 no. o者? ...

另外, 同埋 '2' 同 '7' 個字都差唔多, 分分鐘好易令人混淆, 好易上錯車...

仲有 , 796X 使唔使用成 17 架車? 而家客量又唔多, 12 架都比多佢啦...

Article 13: (Request 2)

796X好似只用13部車，點解佢話17部車?

佢係咪796M+796X用車啊?

Article 13: (Request 3}

其實要怪，是否應怪297，明明是坑口線卻霸了97系？

佢話796x去九地嘛！但是296d又是尚德尖咀，其實將來

點plan的？

久休復出的

波子

Article 13: (Request 4}

> 其實要怪，是否應怪297，

明明是坑口線卻霸了97系？

莫非坑口區一定要用98系?

四順咁細，都『霸』了23/26/27/29系，

何況坑口!

50336-1

Article 14:

回應:

[01|02]

Re: 中/新巴 Condor 的車廂內水箱蓋

Flying Chuk (chuk@netvigator.com) at Tue Mar 14 21:09:37 CST 2000 said:
> Gakei! (joskklee@deloitte.com.hk) said:

> 今早坐 914, 巴士是翻新了內籠的 DA84,

> 全車新 o既一樣, 唯獨是那已髹上淺灰

> 色的水箱蓋, 蓋邊是黐滿透明膠紙, 十

> 分核凸.

>

> 回想起中巴時代, 好多 CONDOR 個水箱蓋

> 都係黐滿 o野, 好常見係中巴熱線貼紙.

>

> 尤竟個蓋搞乜鬼? 如果唔黐 o的貼紙會

> 有乜後果? 個蓋會甩出 o黎? 還是有 o野

> 會漏出來?

係會漏熱氣出o黎.....

>

> 印象中又唔見九巴 Dragon 水箱蓋有 o野

> 黐住, 點解新巴花咁多錢翻新車廂都唔改

> 善一下?

因九巴用玻璃膠封左,但始終有少少熱氣走出o黎.

>

> --

> 車匙!

小竺

Article 14: (Request 1)

> 印象中又唔見九巴 Dragon 水箱蓋有 o野

> 黐住,......

九巴的龍用玻璃膠整到一撻撻咁你見唔到咩？

尤其係舊熱狗龍仲精彩。

Article 14: (Request 2)

會唔會係架車曾經漏水呢

50320-1

Article 15:

回應:

[01|02]

Re: Speaking to bus drivers, legal or not?

Cityflyer A29 (cpitech@netvigator.com) at Tue Mar 14 19:07:48 CST 2000 said:
> 100/911R/M1/300/917 (wongj1@netvigator.com) said:

> Sorry for starting a new thread, though I think

> this topic is rather interesting.

>

> We all know speaking to the driver while a bus is

> in motion is illegal on franchised buses due to

> safety concerns, as bus drivers might get distracted,

> right?

>

> However, why the same rule doesn't apply on minibuses?

>

> Indeed, many passengers on minibuses have to 'talk'

> to the drivers in order to signal for a stop!

>

> So, some of you may say, 'hey, that's only a one-way

> conversation, as the drivers don't have to respond

> in words!'

>

> Is there no response from the driver? Probably not

> in many cases, as these drivers usually take one of

> the hands to signal the drivers have achknowledged

> the busstop request! Which means taking a hand off

> the steering wheel or from the shift gear, just as

> dangerous like that of using a mobile phone without

> a hands free function.

>

> Whenever I take GMB6 to work, I would 'yell' for

> busstop either before or after the bus makes the

> left turn reaching the top of Hung Hom KCR from

> Austin Road, worrying the bus driver might have to

> signal for achknowledgement meanwhile downshifting

> for making the turn.

>

> Personnally, I don't see much problem regarding talking

> and driving at the same time, since my eyes would still

> be on the road (even despite good looking girls on board!)

> instead of to the passenger on board! Indeed, my

> mom always talks to me whenever I drive as she

> worries I might fall into sleep! Though I sure

> think hands-free is necessary for those drivers who

> wish to drive while using a mobile phone.

>

> Please comment on the issue...

>

> 100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

The point is, bus passengers has normally, many questions, which really can distract the driver,

e.g.' Should I alight at this stop or the next?'

'Why is the bus stop at Tin Hau'

If you do not answer these questions the bus driver is impolite.

Did you really look at girls, talk to your mum, shifting the gear all at once during driving?

Article 15: (Request 1)

In San Francisco, the rule on the bus is written as

follows:

'Information gladly given but regulations prohibit

unneccessary conversation (with drivers)'.

>

> Did you really look at girls, talk to your mum, shifting the gear all at once during driving?

I only talk to girls and my mom while I drive (my

car is automatic!), back in US I used to carry

girls in the back seats so I can look at them once

in a while through the mirror!

100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

Article 15: (Request 2)

> 陳亞木(馬亞木) (wilsonptchan@ctimail3.com) said:

>

> 其實搭所有交通工具(包括私家車)都不應與司機談話。

> 只是小巴沒有貼上警告字句(想是小巴公司窮吧)！

> 不過我經常與54K小巴的司機談是非啦！

>

> 陳亞木(馬亞木)

However, without talking to the minibus drivers,

how can I signal when/where I wish to alight? Not

all minibus routes have bells for passengers to push lar!

100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

50321-1

Article 16:

回應:

[01|02]

Re: 明智的人就不要住新界北區!

荔景南 45M (mlchui@netvigator.com) at Tue Mar 14 21:00:51 CST 2000 said:
> 小丸子新巴開篷DM6 rt.15C (c8002953@net1.hkbu.edu.hk) said:

> 如果住係新界北區,對外交通不足,又冇往港島全日

> 隧巴線,呃錢鐵路日日又迫餐死........

>

> 政府成日想末殺新界北區居民......

>

>

> 真不想我阿姨買粉嶺的居屋住..

> JJ4786 rt.15C

Agree!

I remembered in 1995, when I decided to

move to a new house, a choice was made

between Hung Shui Kiu and Sheung Shui.

Finally I chose HSK, as nearly all buses

from Tin Shui Wai and Yuen Long was via it.

And I expected the opening of Route 3 would

further improve the transportation here.

However, the actual story is the bus service

..... From 7 routes reduced to 3 routes, what

can you say?

So if everybody have the ability to chose your

dream home, Sheung Shui is really a bad choice,

if you work in Kowloon or HK Island!

荔景南 45M

Article 16: (Request 1)

咁要一單還一單,我都好唔鐘意搭kcr,不過KCR的價錢係平過九巴冷巴.

不過,kcr真是太迫啦,我真係寧願可以比多小小錢搭冷巴都好過搭kcr.

愛上914巴 (老陳)

Article 16: (Request 2)

> 欣盛的Eric (ericnet1@netvigator.com) said:

> 筆者對閣下的言論表示失望.

其實 DM6 RT.15C 兄之說有一半係對又有一半係不對 , 不對的是 kcr 其實係無呃錢,仲平過九巴的冷巴,而對的就是kcr真係太迫 , 又無足夠的巴士服務 , 北區的對外交通確是很差 , 因此他勸人不要住新界北區是合理的.(因為我都好後悔住在太和)

>

> 若人人都聽你這樣說, 北區發展只會一直倒退, 這樣, 巴士公司怎會投放資源入北區巴士服務?

這一點就是運輸處的錯,不是 DM6 rt.15c 兄的說錯,運輸處安排咁小的北區對外巴士服務,令北區居民飽受迫KCR之苦,運輸處確是罪魁禍首,千古罪人.

愛上914巴

50318-1

Article 17:

回應:

[01|02]

Re: 尋新巴LV22,DM4和2M派車一問

新巴88線常客兼站長 (kintak@netteens.net) at Tue Mar 14 19:20:35 CST 2000 said:
> 紅磡之友(DE6127) (wong01@netteens.net) said:

> LV22,DM4現在行什麼線

>

> 今日2M派什麼編的LV和SF

LV22應該行84, DM4釘蓋了

2M今日有一部短飛鏢及SF6健康生活新紀元廣告

Article 17: (Request 1)

DM4翻生走91,94

SF6走91,88

Article 17: (Request 2)

> 紅磡之友(DE6127) (wong01@netteens.net) said:

>

> DM4唔該續到2001年3月8日

那麼我就唔清楚了

50315-1

Article 18:

回應:

[01|02]

Re: [問] 借問 968 D 超豪去晒邊?

在 269D 的 3ASV32 (jackyyng@netteens.net) at Tue Mar 14 23:36:11 CST 2000 said:
> 細佬~郵差叔叔 (ausaiho@netvigator.com) said:

> [問] 借問 968 D 超豪去晒邊? 呢輪架架都係 ATR (都普戟同丹尼士戟咋)... 唔通去晒 269D 度?

如果之前有部份係裝左或者裝緊報站機，咁就應

該去左行 269D 。

唔係就可能調番去行 68X 。

Article 18: (Request 1)

> 3AD138 (3ad138@i-fresh.com) said:

>

> Yes.They all go to 269D

唔係喎!269D大分車是68X字軌車

Article 18: (Request 2)

係囉，我咁日係中環見到好多968超豪。

1409 Trident

50290-1

Article 19:

回應:

[01|02]

76

A.C.K.L. (olympian@netteens.net) at Tue Mar 14 15:15:52 CST 2000 said:
> 我愛新巴! (cmb-da77@i-cable.com) said:

> 今日見到1301行25A

1301不嬲都係76字軌  啦, 邊有退役喎!

Article 19: (Request 1)

> 西區攻略者- 5B (ronaldsamuel@ctimail.com) said:

>

> ACKL 兄, 1301 會於數星期內退役

實情架車幾多號到期呢?

PTC

Article 19: (Request 2)

非也...1301 退役之時是2214, 1561-1580 出牌之日

50298-1

Article 20:

回應:

[01|02]

Re: 嶼巴不尋常二之人人有份永不落空

100/911R/M1/300/917 (wongj1@netvigator.com) at Tue Mar 14 17:28:35 CST 2000 said:
> George Chan(S3N171) (s3n171@ismart.net) said:

> 近日,我坐S1去東涌,當S1差唔多到東涌  時候,見到好多嶼巴新舊車(尤其是好似校車  架)都裝上電子牌,我諗嶼巴咁做真係令該公司派出  車種人人有份永不落空

Electronic displays had been installed on NLB buses

for almost, if not more, than a year lar!

Only certain franchised bus company still insists

use of electronic display is not good and refuses

to install such on its new buses!

100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

Article 20: (Request 1)

電子牌不及膠牌般在任何光線環境下都清楚,

如果屬實, 絕非好消息.

--

車匙!

> Bruce Li (bruceli@vcn.bc.ca) said:

> Do you mean KMB? but i heard from a boardmate that KMB will install electronic display in all of their new buses in the coming future wor!

Article 20: (Request 2)

> 100/911R/M1/300/917 (wongj1@netvigator.com) said:

> Electronic displays had been installed on NLB buses

> for almost, if not more, than a year lar!

> Only certain franchised bus company still insists

> use of electronic display is not good and refuses

> to install such on its new buses!

嶼巴果種電子牌, 以前中九巴發霉牌布都清楚過佢 ...

50345-1

Article 21:

回應:

[01|02]

Re: 有趣問題

Christopher (chris_ng@hk.super.net) at Tue Mar 14 22:09:24 CST 2000 said:
> 公安 (joelty@ismart.net) said:

> 有人話九巴在將軍澳落金車, 是為了對抗新巴

> 但佢唔話新巴因為對抗九巴而落超豪

>

> 而九巴買低地台就係宣傳

> 新巴就係為傷殘人仕服務

雙重標準嘛！見怪不怪啦！見到o的人重係

咁講都費事再回佢文，反正話完又係咁，

講多盞o徙P-net錢！

Christopher

Article 21: (Request 1)

次次條 thread 六七十篇文都係果幾丁友做 o既好事。

明知來來去去都係講果 D 野仲去回文，同間接攪罵戰

有乜分別?

冇人回佢，見到係佢貼就唔睇佢，呢度會安寧好多。

Article 21: (Request 2)

> 次次條 thread 六七十篇文都係果幾丁友做 o既好事。

弊就弊在有o的人剩係識得講:「個班人三日唔埋兩日就

講一次同樣o既話題，擺明係度搞罵戰！」但係自己就每

次見到「個班人」係度貼o的「三復被文章」就誓必「

怒火中燒」，同「個班人」大鬧特鬧一餐！

大家唔見得次次條thread六七十篇文都係o個兩班人做

o既好事咩。

真係好笑！(唉......)

Regrads

50344-1

Article 22:

回應:

[01]

Re: [統計] 有哪些網頁有字軌表的？

Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) at Tue Mar 14 22:19:11 CST 2000 said:
> 慘被調往601的3AV46 (s986380@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) said:

> 有哪些網頁有字軌表的？

>

> 可否把它們的 URL 貼上來

> 供日後大家在沒有 HKBDB 字軌表時可供參考？

> 謝謝

祥華巴士路線專輯(Cwahp)

http://w3.to/cwahp

~~~Tony(S3M61)~~~

Article 22: (Request 1)

> GZ5818 (kytse1@netvigator.com) said:

>

> 70X 網頁: http://i.am/70x

>

> GZ5818/Tonio Tse

A11巴士總站 Http://Fly.to/A11(大修中)

2154(A11站長)

50332-1

Article 23:

回應:

[01|02]

Re: 問九巴91M,298:

Eddie Lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) at Tue Mar 14 20:27:15 CST 2000 said:
Philips (ykfong@vtech.net) said:

> 91M,298可否用11米2+2AV代3+2的ADS?

不可，因為十一米巴士轉清水灣道轉入坑口道有問題。

Article 23: (Request 1)

> Philips (ykfong@vtech.net) said:

> 91M,298可否用11米2+2AV代3+2的ADS?

>

> Eddie Lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:

> 不可，因為十一米巴士轉清水灣道轉入坑口道有問題。

很久以前曾有AL/AV攝298, 不過近呢幾年都未見過,

可能同ADS的供求有關.

Article 23: (Request 2)

> Eddie Lam (bustop@glink.net.hk) said:

>

> 不可，因為十一米巴士轉清水灣道轉入坑口道有問題。

待坑口道擴闊工程完成後，

未知是否可以行10m以上的巴士?

50326-1

Article 24:

回應:

[01]

Re: 南區路線一問

3302L (refchan@netteens.net) at Tue Mar 14 19:34:26 CST 2000 said:
> 紅磡之友(DE6127) (wong01@netteens.net) said:

> 仲有南區未全冷路線

43(有時全冷),91(有冷),94(全熱),91A(有冷),93(有時全冷),95(全熱),95A(有時冷),

Article 24: (Request 1)

> 紅磡之友(DE6127) (wong01@netteens.net) said:

>

>

> 94A仲有HOT DOG行

94A的兩部熱狗係95A的

50313-1

Article 25:

回應:

[01|02|03]

尋車+幾問?

傑B仔 (atr1.ryan@i-cable.com) at Tue Mar 14 17:04:17 CST 2000 said:
找尋以下車輛

LV1,2,4

SF4,7

3N4-10

DM1

1.3BL80是否退役?因為在陳SIR書中沒有這架車?

2.LV1會否保留?

3.九記有幾多架兔年巴士?

4.現在香港有沒有都普寶?如有在什麼地方?

5.LV5退役了未?

THANK YOU

Article 25: (Request 1)

> LV1

Wong Chuk Hang Depot

> 3N4-10

3N8: 1A?

> DM1

45

>

> 2.LV1會否保留?

Not known, but the bonnet has been detached.

> 3.九記有幾多架兔年巴士?

HG????, FA????, AV101,?

Anthony Lui

Anthony's Bus Homepage

http://drive.to/abh

Article 25: (Request 2)

> 4.現在香港有沒有都普寶?如有在什麼地方?

> THANK YOU

There has never been any 'Duple' bodied Fleetline,

only 'Metsec' (Metal Section) ones.

Metsec was acquired by Duple after the 'Fleetline'

days and the first product being seen in Hong Kong

should be those N's or LV148-167.

If you were referring to Metsec Fleetline, there

shouldn't be anymore in Hong Kong.

100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

Article 25: (Request 3)

> 找尋以下車輛

> SF4

On 88.

> 5.LV5退役了未?

未，今天應該行81.

> THANK YOU

It's my pleasure.

50309-1

Article 26:

回應:

[01|02]

LM的路線牌

NWFB4001 (oxball@netteens.net) at Tue Mar 14 16:56:14 CST 2000 said:
為什麼中巴只在LM上採用大型路線牌,

而VA則要等到VA51-64才用上這種路線牌呢?

Thanks!

NWFB4001

Article 26: (Request 1)

> 查篤撐 ‧ 查小欣 (cityflyer@i-cable.com) said:

> 在陳自瑜《香港巴士手冊-中華巴士》中有一段

> 關於這個問題的文章,我把它節錄下來:

> 新車出廠初期,因「亞歷山大」車身供應商誤以

> 為中巴會採納與九巴同一樣的單一幅闊數字牌

> 布,故錯誤地提供了有關零件,及後亦得到更正,

> 全數採用三幅獨立數字牌布。

>

> 而圖片可在《再見藍戰士-中巴紀念圖輯》中看到。

查兄, 我想你唔會了我的意思, 我指的不是LM原裝'牌布', 而是想問LM的'牌箱'為何是採用大型, 像九巴老虎頭那種的牌箱, 但3+2VA又用回扁身的那一款?

Thanks!

P.S.標題不小心把'誤'字錯打作'唔'字, 抱歉!

NWFB4001

Article 26: (Request 2)

究竟當年係咪中巴好急要批車,攪到架架LM九成似九巴都照單全收?

定係因為當年傳言中話LA要耕梗改做LM至會攪成咁?

最奇怪係Alexander 唔係出S3BL421未換膠牌o個種框,

反而係膠牌機用o既框,但又唔包膠牌牌機,用番攪牌布機.

真係奇怪.

諗極都唔明點解會出錯o既PTC

50303-1

Article 27:

回應:

[01|02]

Re: 269D+超豪幾問!

Benz (sing1817@netteens.net) at Tue Mar 14 16:30:22 CST 2000 said:
> vole (voletsy@ismart.net) said:

> 今日終於有機會搭到269D,不過全程都大約

> 只有20個乘客上車.不過有幾個問題想問一問.

>

> 1)由開線至今,269D有冇試過滿座?

> 因為由我搭264M入天中沿途見到 269D同搭269D去

> 沙田時,架架269D都只係得幾個乘客.

> 2)現在客量既然不多,全線用超豪是否有點浪費呢?

> 可否將269D 超豪繼續在68X服務至269D客量上升時

> 才再行駛269D呢?

> (其實暫時用ATS應該也沒問題)

> 3)是否所有超豪  車速也被鎖死?

> 我今日搭 3ASV47,入大隧前被幾乎滿座 968(3AD92)

> 同城記969爬頭,到屯門公路時又被60MS3BL239過埋.

>

> 4)點解269D到德士古道唔上天橋,而要行下面同其他車塞

> 一排先?如果跟機場巴士一樣都行天橋,起碼可減少3-5

> 分鐘行車時間.

>

> 希望有人可以幫我解答以上  問題啦...問該晒!

My bus was full when I travel on Sunday

Benz

Article 27: (Request 1)

> 4)點解269D到德士古道唔上天橋,而要行下面同其他車塞

> 一排先?如果跟機場巴士一樣都行天橋,起碼可減少3-5

> 分鐘行車時間.

如果係荃灣路落去德士古道係上唔到橋的。

Article 27: (Request 2)

> 3)是否所有超豪  車速也被鎖死?

應該所有九巴超豪都係鎖0左4波。我0係269D開線第一日搭3ASV46去沙田,鎖0左4波,

最高時速只有70km/h,肯定cut0左油;翻天水圍時搭3ASV47,都係鎖0左4波,但出0左城隧後落斜

竟去到80km/h,而且0係快速公路行都唔止70km/h,我諗應該冇cut油。

P.S.:當時部3ASV47係冇乜人。

天水圍居民

Ivan

50299-1

Article 28:

回應:

[01|02]

模型消息: 城巴2282 千禧龍年巴士

西區攻略者- 5B (ronaldsamuel@ctimail.com) at Tue Mar 14 16:00:51 CST 2000 said:
Corgi 將會推出城巴2282龍年廣告巴士, 預計月內有售

以下是該模型的初版, 坐位會由藍色改為紅色

左

右

不過上落樓梯方面...希望亦會作出改動吧!

Article 28: (Request 1)

> iceman (kon@ismart.net) said:

> 之前有人話D位會改,車頭用鐵水撥,貨不對辦o既,其實做3款model,應該做返同真車一樣的座位,做好D,威俾Drumwell睇!!

>

> 好似同DMS差不多時間出。

係唔係#2265、2301ࣽ都係用呢個模？？

Article 28: (Request 2)

yes

將來仲有用la

點解唔做好D

50347-1

Article 29:

回應:

[01|02]

Re: [問]Shun Lee-->Tuen Mun

DM2575 (ywc98426@ywc.hkcampus.net) at Wed Mar 15 00:05:14 CST 2000 said:
> EU5923(S3BL405) (stephenbutt@aol.com) said:

> The Fastest Way Form Shun Lee-->Tuen Mun Butterfly Estate Commerical Center In This Sunday

> Thanks!

27->59x

Article 29: (Request 1)

補充少少,各位板友其實可能在提議路線時會忽略左

59X是不經蝴蝶村的,搭59X落車後需要步行較遠路程,

不過俾我揀最快方法,我都係會揀搭59X的.

Article 29: (Request 2)

> Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) said:

>

> 方法一：

> 搭42至美孚後，轉59A或59X前往

>

> 方法二：

> 先搭29M至彩虹舊總站

> 再過對面轉61X往屯門市中心

> 最後轉LRT506,507,614前往蝴蝶站

>

> ~~~Tony(S3M61)~~~

> 我的巴士總站

方法三：

搭 29M / 綠小 54 到彩虹村龍翔道 (29M 需要向後步行) ，轉 259D (繁忙時間線)

(最快應該係呢個方法)

方法四：

搭 27 在太子地鐵站落車，步行至彌敦道找 59X 搭

50339-1

Article 30:

回應:

[01]

Re: AMN TRAINING ............

BUS.COM (a808ytleung@ctimail3.com) at Tue Mar 14 23:37:27 CST 2000 said:
> S3BL416 (maircthienxx@ctimail3.com) said:

> I saw AMN in Shatin,I think it will be in 182.Is it?

今天我見到AMN1在沙田圍巴士站打住111港澳碼頭

Article 30: (Request 1)

測試新車款的早期, 主要都係呢度試下

果度試下, 未必係試某一條路線.

--

車匙!

50334-1

Article 31:

回應:

[01]

Re: 陸續有來:Neoplan Centroliner

1409 Trident (aronkam@netteens.net) at Tue Mar 14 20:42:33 CST 2000 said:
> Leslie Chan (neoplan@ismart.net) said:

> 據可靠消息,新巴和九巴的Centroliner將會在四月到港,

> 另九巴除原有的60部訂單外,據知另加訂了50部Centroliner.

>

> Leslie Chan

九巴真闊綽，成130部(連埋之前  )，幾好。

1409 Trident

Article 31: (Request 1)

等陣又有人話九巴買低地台做宣傳

50333-1

Article 32:

回應:

[01]

Re: 相片，請評分! ^__^

S3BL182~DR4014 (wendywon@asiaonline.net) at Tue Mar 14 20:11:20 CST 2000 said:
> Jason Hei (HR1969) (Leoahchau@ctimail.com) said:

>

>

> Jason Hei

...99.5分!

Article 32: (Request 1)

What about the 0.5 and any comments?

Jason Hei

50328-1

Article 33:

回應:

[01]

Re: 相片，請評分

新巴88線常客兼站長 (kintak@netteens.net) at Tue Mar 14 19:52:53 CST 2000 said:
> CX1 (hv6619@netvigator.com) said:

> 好耐無post相上來囉

>

好相片!

Article 33: (Request 1)

> 好耐無post相上來囉

係咩?小弟就評評分啦!

>

角度都OK啦!不過D微粒好似粗0左D!

>

CX1兄,你影到個車頭好奇怪!

>

CX1兄,你呢張角度OK,不過車頭太光!

>

呢張......普通啦!

>

> http://lsc.hkcampus.net/~lsc99207/1422.jpg>

(請CX1兄你唔好介意小弟剛才0既愚見!)

有時我都好想post D相上0黎,可惜我未有website!

認清正貨,提防假冒!

馬鞍山之友

HN7282,上!

ICQ:45871364,請勿炸我,THX!

50329-1

Article 34:

回應:

[01]

Re: 問九記27的3AD

Volvo (S3BL1) (volvo@school.net.hk) at Tue Mar 14 21:18:59 CST 2000 said:
> Kenrick DG3001 (h9808241@hkusua.hku.hk) said:

> 由這個星期開始, 小弟發現九記27的3AD

> 被數部AV, 3AV所代替. 唔知道是掛左第

> 二條線還是轉廠還是年驗?

27 及 601 的掛牌車全數對調.

另 603 亦換了大量 2+2 AV, 有 264M 來的, 亦有 89X 等線.

619 亦同 83K 對調掛牌車.

是否更新隧巴車隊?

> Kenrick DG3001

>

> 香港巴士資料中心

> 請多多支持

>

Article 34: (Request 1)

據聞 3AD46,156,158 轉了去 601

P.S. 找到 ATS 27 同 3338L 的車牌未？

50327-1

Article 35:

回應:

[01]

Re: (3AD24)HH4738&(AV72)GF3087

Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) at Tue Mar 14 20:42:21 CST 2000 said:
> 駐上水的城記迷ALAN (so_cheng@ctimail3.com) said:

> 請問有沒有板友見過(3AD24)HH4738&(AV72)GF3087？

> 小弟曾經坐過呢兩架車行70X。

HH4738不是3AD24，3AD24正確係HH6167。

HH4738係3AD16，係269B掛牌車(星期日見過HH4738在天水圍)；而HH6167係278X掛牌，經常都見到。

~~~Tony(S3M61)~~~

我的巴士網頁

Article 35: (Request 1)

AV72後來改掛619

三月轉沙廠掛83K

50319-1

Article 36:

回應:

[01]

Re: HN牌富豪換左風口?可以開關

超奧再現720 (cotquean@netvigator.com) at Tue Mar 14 22:12:03 CST 2000 said:
> HC 1524 (ks95155@ks.hkcampus.net) said:

> 昨天搭276P,上左HN7553富豪11m,發覺風口同以一樣,但多左一個掣,是否可以開關呢?

我上次撘74x十一米豪，都發現了這個。係可以調校出風方向的！

Article 36: (Request 1)

> Christopher (chris_ng@hk.super.net) said:

>

> 是不是用原有的細長形風口位，但換上了

> 都普躉/Centroliner那種細長形但可調校

> 的款式？

>

> Christopher

出風口是長條形的，與舊車無異，

但在一端就多了一個圓形旋轉調校，

縱置於出風口處(有別於其他款形的出風口)，

撥動該調校便可令出口方向偏左或偏右。

我個人就幾欣賞這種款式。

50314-1

Article 37:

回應:

[01]

Re: 有意請人暫代72A字軌兩個月

Harry (feanshek@ctimail3.com) at Tue Mar 14 17:07:44 CST 2000 said:
> SNOo... 3304L/DC8 (dc8@school.net.hk) said:

> 因為本人要Prepare會考，暫無2處理72A字軌的乾務，所以要請人暫做字軌代理人兩個月，有意的人請Email給私。

做多一個星期啦!20號字軌表都取消...

Article 37: (Request 1)

我打算搵到人做先算！

50305-1

Article 38:

回應:

[01|02]

矮TRIDENT一問

nwfb 3304L (rickycklee@ctimail3.com) at Tue Mar 14 16:31:54 CST 2000 said:
聽聞TRIDENT只得前軸蹲下功能.那麼矮TRIDENT怎樣把地台降至地面?(矮TRIDENT塊斜板是放係中門的)

順道問埋, 'DENT'字點寫?

Article 38: (Request 1)

雖只得前軸有蹲下功能,但成部車都會下降0左,所以不會有大問題。

而且所有有斜板0既城巴都躉同外國部份低地台巴士塊斜板都係放0係中門,

何況矮躉隻中門係貼近前軸呢！

Trident迷

Ivan

Article 38: (Request 2)

> nwfb 3304L (rickycklee@ctimail3.com) said:

> 順道問埋, 'DENT'字點寫?

躉字的倉頡碼是廿田月人。

ML33

50301-1

Article 39:

回應:

[01]

Re: 九巴路線82K能否過三月?

NWFB 740/740A (eg2346bc1@hcy.hkcampus.net) at Tue Mar 14 16:22:29 CST 2000 said:
> Felix LEUNG (felixleung@start3.com) said:

> 運輸署建議在三月底取消九巴路線82K以綠Van取代，小弟在前天向各版友報告．事隔兩天，

> 各方對此線應否保留意見不一，而社區團體正進行問卷調查，結果尚未知道．我的立場是不願看任何一條巴士

> 線取消，應以改變路線的方法或作適當的資源調配以保留路線．你對此事有何意見？

應該取消,因,為客量太少

同樣理由,九巴87,新巴88都應取消

Article 39: (Request 1)

你咁喜歡取消晒所有路線...

你個區(你講過住邊區)都有好多蝕錢線.

摺晒都無問題呀,

最好笑係呢類蝕錢線可能會無人肯接手做(隨時城巴/新巴都未必肯做)

咁點呢, 即係無得搭lu

50300-1

Article 40:

回應:

[01]

Re: 路線建議:新/城 737X 葵盛--佐敦道碼頭

Christopher (chris_ng@hk.super.net) at Tue Mar 14 19:52:04 CST 2000 said:
> NWFB 740/740A (eg2346bc1@hcy.hkcampus.net) said:

> 由於葵盛重建已接近完成,乘客漸多,

> 但某某巴士公司卻不將37加密班次加冷,

> 237A還是老樣子,

> 既然某某巴士公司提供了這樣的服務,

> 不如叫新巴/城巴開737X:葵盛--九龍站,經蔡聯路,葵盛圍,大窩口道,興芳路,荃灣路,葵涌道,西九龍走廊直出彌敦道,梳士巴利道,九龍公園徑,廣東道

> 班次12-20分一班,一星期開足七天,

> 所有班次用冷氣巴士行走

咁整法，運輸署叫你不如落葵芳轉地龍，重有

東涌線俾你揀。

Christopher

Article 40: (Request 1)

不如將他改由西九龍走廊,紅磡繞道,梳士巴利道,彌敦道,做循環線ma

50297-1

Article 41:

回應:

[01]

Where?

Y. F. Yiu (s9855066@student.ouhk.edu.hk) at Tue Mar 14 16:10:39 CST 2000 said:
> George Chan(S3N171) (s3n171@ismart.net) said:

> 由即日起,九記各1系線會增加3個分站

Would you like to specify where are they?

Article 41: (Request 1)

> DR1666 (S3BL180) (rodneyle@hkstar.com) said:

>

> 三個咁多？我今早搭 AV421 只見車內貼左張

> 通告，話1/1A 往尖咀方向會加停彌敦道 222

> 號一個站咋喎，請問其餘兩站是什麼？

>

> 有錯請指正

>

> DR1666 (S3BL180)

> ICQ UIN: 32303533

Thank god the stop in front of Prudential Centre

will be added back!

I sure did complained to the concerned government

department regarding the matter!

100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

50293-1

Article 42:

回應:

[01]

Re: What happen??

GiGi Fans -- Chicken (ywc94120@ywc.hkcampus.net) at Tue Mar 14 16:36:55 CST 2000 said:
> GK 2508 (lmc02103@lmc.hkcampus.net) said:

> What happen on KMB AL 27 and 118 ??

> THX.

> GK 2508

Their original Alexander R-type bodies are damaged by fire, so a new body is built on them.

Be careful: AL27 :3+2

AL118:2+2

Article 42: (Request 1)

AL118,had born before! so re-body!

50288-1

Article 43:

回應:

[01]

Re: 問新巴 SF6.

3302L (refchan@netteens.net) at Tue Mar 14 19:36:46 CST 2000 said:
> 新巴3340L (pangkp@powerup.com.au) said:

> As title,I want to know,which route they

> run?Thank you very much!^_^.

>

> WFB 3340L.

要搵可以搵91,88

Article 43: (Request 1)

VA1 serves 111 today.

DA1 serves for 2 or 18 usually.

50284-1

Article 44:

回應:

[01]

Re: 如果九巴的31B路線要加冷,可否用ATS?

在269D的3ASV32 (jackyyng@netteens.net) at Tue Mar 14 14:17:03 CST 2000 said:
> LEMON (i-ray@i-cable.com) said:

> 如果九巴的31B路線要加冷,可否用ATS?

石籬總站的路段太斜，未必適合低地台行走。

Article 44: (Request 1)

ATS 太細，會唔夠載，只能用 AV 。

50351-1

Article 45:

回應:

[00]

Re: 相片速遞﹕VA65行691

超奧再現720 (cotquean@netvigator.com) at Tue Mar 14 23:23:31 CST 2000 said:
> Dennis Law (lmcky@netvigator.com) said:

> 這幕情景，確實令我感到有點驚訝 ﹕

>

>

>

>

>

> 但無論如何，希望大家會喜歡這批相片 ﹗^_^

>

> ------------------------------

>

> 想見Joey個簽名 ﹖ 即刻去HKForum﹗

> (今期相片推介 ﹕Joey現身於大埔。)

噢！實在太太太太太太感動喇！今晚見到va65行691，

帶  螢光的新牌布，在漆黑的皇仁門前掠過....

估唔到返到 '?就可以看見她的照片！多謝您啊！

生活在香港實在太幸福喇！生命真美好喔！

50348-1

Article 46:

回應:

[00]

今日中環打仗.........

超奧再現720 (cotquean@netvigator.com) at Tue Mar 14 22:57:40 CST 2000 said:
> Mr_Bus (iwi@netvigator.com) said:

> 琴晚睇完'"?石浩劫',估唔到今日翻工見到的情景真與

> 該電影差不多。

> 屹立中環皇后像廣場數十載,是前中巴的歷史建築物,

> 一排石屎巴士站上蓋,竟被'炸毀'變成一堆頹緩敗瓦

> 左搖右擺的碎石和鋼根,再加上混亂的乘客,頓時有

> 點惶恐,未知這次'中環 "?石浩劫'是由那顆行星產生

> 呢？是'新'星還是'城'星, 但應該不是'九'星了!

唉！當年城巴起站蓋就靜好多喇，

因為無需執中巴之蘇州屎。

家陣新巴要先拆舊蓋，再建新蓋，

來得驚天動地！！(擾民)

講真，如果唔係中巴  石屎蓋霸住  位，

新巴休想找到一個位起蓋！(多謝城巴)

50342-1

Article 47:

回應:

[01]

Re: 請問九巴的 GL2220 去了那一條路線服務 ?

細佬~郵差叔叔 (ausaiho@netvigator.com) at Tue Mar 14 21:59:01 CST 2000 said:
> 愛上914巴 (老陳) (chanmw11@hk.super.net) said:

> 請問九巴的 GL2220 去了那一條路線服務 ?

>

> 我好掛住這架車,GL2220,你去了何處? 唔知係唔係我咁巧合在Route 914遇不到你,還是你真係去了其他線 ?

>

> 愛上914巴 (GL2220 老陳)

914 同 251M D 車互相交換了, 即係所有原 914 既舊 AV 全部過檔晒 251M , 而 251M 既新 AV (中間冇位個隻) 去左 914 ... 想坐 GL2220 既話, 唯有去搭 251M ...

Article 47: (Request 1)

914 既AV 的的確係同251M 交換左,

GL2220 我都見過佢行251M...

50343-1

Article 48:

回應:

[00]

Re: where are KCR 312-317

AD262--GR5386 (bad.guys.go.to.hell@i-cable.com) at Tue Mar 14 22:11:54 CST 2000 said:
> Sodium BENZo@te~269M (jubilant@netteens.net) said:

> where are KCR 312-317

幾個月前仲o係 HTR Loop,而家唔見左喇!

P.S.架 222 同另外一架紅蘭去 HTR Loop 做乜?

AD262--GR5386

ICQ#51715169

50341-1

Article 49:

回應:

[00]

Re: 九巴網頁有料到

慘被調往601的3AV46 (s986380@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) at Tue Mar 14 21:22:09 CST 2000 said:
> 3302L (refchan@netteens.net) said:

> 九巴而家招標賣：

> 兩部Falcon機場巴士；扣留部份零件，以廢車出售

> 十四部Jubilant；五部扣留部份零件以廢車出售，一部以廢車出售、八部以二手車出售

是否這個：http://www.kmb.com.hk/tender/form_c.html

二月一日截止了

50338-1

Article 50:

回應:

[00]

Re: [求救] 新巴模型引擎蓋點樣合埋??

3302L (refchan@netteens.net) at Tue Mar 14 21:16:09 CST 2000 said:
> 愛上903˙ 巴 (elliec@ctimail3.com) said:

> 新巴模型引擎蓋點樣合埋??

> please teach me, thanks!!!

如果你話1087龍年車就要用些少「暴力」先得

個引擎蓋有粒「的」要用0的力按入去

50337-1

Article 51:

回應:

[00]

Re: 隧巴307一問.

100/911R/M1/300/917 (wongj1@netvigator.com) at Tue Mar 14 23:46:29 CST 2000 said:
> LV83 CM2681 (an7@isicmail.com) said:

> 如題,隧巴307會否轉全日服務,而我覺得有

> 這需求!唔該各位!

>

> LV83.

According to sources by other boardmates earlier,

plan for full day service of 307 had been rejected

by district board representatives.

My own conspiracy theory has that, in addition to

certain government's policy which discourages any

full day service of 3xx series routes, has that

since many residential buses are 'sponsored' by

these district board members/representatives, who

knows what kind of relationship would they have with

those non-franchised bus companies.

100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

50324-1

Article 52:

回應:

[00]

Re: 九記千禧巴報告

Gakei! (joskklee@deloitte.com.hk) at Tue Mar 14 22:32:55 CST 2000 said:
車頭 ATR109 和沙廠徽是否仍在錶板上?

車身的上落客額貼紙是否仍貼在車窗上?

--

車匙!

> HA7883 (chengtt@ctimail.com) said:

> 九巴千禧巴 HZ8186(ATR109)年驗後已經落了千禧廣告,今日且行81c(我估係工程部賣血)

> HA7883

50312-1

Article 53:

回應:

[00]

Re: ML

3302L (refchan@netteens.net) at Tue Mar 14 20:27:28 CST 2000 said:
> Harry (feanshek@ctimail3.com) said:

> 可唔可以上石排灣?

>

>

> Thx!

冇乜可能，因為以前MC行65上山路都唔夠力

50311-1

Article 54:

回應:

[01]

【漏網新聞】鐵路為主、不利乘客

荔景南 45M (mlchui@netvigator.com) at Tue Mar 14 17:14:43 CST 2000 said:
可能該報冇將這段新聞上網（約30多K）

這是運輸局的顧問報告，要點是政府

「鐵路為主」的政策，使乘客失去選擇

之餘，更浪費時間及金錢。而得益的只

是鐵路公司及私家車車主。

對於政府一向「自以為是」的政策，此顧問報告

無疑是當頭捧喝，大為無癮！

很奇怪只有該報有此段新聞，而HKBDB

更冇人討論。

以洪水橋為例，若取消960P，難道要我搭輕鐵、

西鐵轉地鐵返灣仔？

結果，小弟部「前七」咪重出江湖羅！

荔景南 45M

電腦王子兄請到此

Article 54: (Request 1)

唉！運吉成日都保護鐵路，減少巴士數量.....離哂譜！

一日到黑剩係識講鐵路點好，巴士點衰......都仲可以

講乜  公平競爭！

巴士成日都買新車，鐵路？D車行  成廿年都照行，將

D車翻就當係新車咁行......

不過，運吉逼到D小巴仲犀利，政府成日都剝削小巴 

權利，小巴商有錢都要  '?交幾十萬牌費，想買架新車

都唔得喇！不過小巴都係底死  ，成日買埋D二手車！！！

遲D有石油氣小巴，  時D小巴客就真係正囉！

陳亞木(馬亞木)

50308-1

Article 55:

回應:

[00]

Re: [徵求] 巴士模型website address

GiGi Fans -- Chicken (ywc94120@ywc.hkcampus.net) at Tue Mar 14 17:12:07 CST 2000 said:
> Hk man (kon@ismart.net) said:

> 最好是HK

Here may help you.

www.jotus.com

50306-1

Article 56:

回應:

[00]

Re: [板務]

HKBDB Admin (-) at Tue Mar 14 19:33:04 CST 2000 said:
> ML33 (terencechan@ctimail3.com) said:

> 請問今日特別所見裏可否使用

> HTML Tags?

>

> 謝謝!

>

> ML33

不能.

HKBDB Admin

50296-1

Article 57:

回應:

[010]

269D頭車

A.C.K.L. (olympian@netteens.net) at Tue Mar 14 15:27:43 CST 2000 said:
請問269D頭車有冇'老細'呢?

小弟或者係269D的第一位乘客.

3月12日,朝頭早6點50分小弟搭269D沙田的頭車,

(遲O左2個字開!)

係3ASV49,但就冇見到有任何'老細',所以就咁諗O勒!

PS:架3ASV49係 86K隔離條坑開O既,因為佢O個條坑俾架

跪低O左O既N170城記689頂住!

Article 57: (Request 1)

除非269D首日天水圍頭車全程「運吉」，

否則閣下冇可能係 269D 的第一位乘客。

荔景南 45M

50291-1

Article 58:

回應:

[00]

Re: 上水舊巴士總站終於正式關閉

電腦王子 (shwong@chevalier.net) at Tue Mar 14 18:41:58 CST 2000 said:
> Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) said:

> 自從去年八月十日後，前上水石湖墟巴士總站(上水廠出面空地)一直都係冇再有巴士泊響該處，一些兩味車及過夜既巴士亦改泊彩順街巴士廠。

> 不過，在昨日終於見到有工人開始在該處圍起鐵絲網，亦表示該巴士總站正式關閉。

> 唉...呢個舊上水總站關閉，實在有點可惜不過。畢竟此站已使用了二三十年啦。

>

> ~~~Tony(S3M61)~~~

> 我的巴士網頁

舊上水總站關閉,而入面o既上水廠有無關埋?以及

最後一日有巴士以舊上水總站為終站係幾時?

邊條路線?

50283-1

Article 59:

回應:

[00]

ATS開車時的'必'一聲

巴士大搜查 (96476255@plink.cityu.edu.hk) at Tue Mar 14 07:58:03 CST 2000 said:
為何新一批ATS(即宜家用緊果d),

鬆手掣後開車時會有'必'一聲,而以往的trident無論是哪款車身,都唔會有哪種聲.究竟'必'一聲代表什麼意思呢?

50356-1

Article 60:

回應:

[00]

NWFB TKO Routes Buses......&HT3200

DM8070 (h9924434@hkusua.hku.hk) at Tue Mar 14 23:52:55 CST 2000 said:
Are NWFB planning to reduce the use of Super Olympians on the routes 796M and 796X?

BTW where is HT3200 (Sheung Tak Ad)?

I know I have asked it before, but I really can't see it...... :(

Thx!!

50355-1

Article 61:

回應:

[00]

【廣告】祥華巴士路線專輯

Tony(S3M61) (op615221@netvigator.com) at Tue Mar 14 23:44:44 CST 2000 said:
(小更新)

祥華巴士路線專輯新加入一個專欄 ─ 遊河精選

並加入了「新界一日遊」系列中有關於沙田及天水圍區之旅詳細資料。

歡迎參觀

~~~Tony(S3M61)~~~

50354-1

Article 62:

回應:

[00]

九巴未來一年會買什麼新車?

eric ching (bching@hk.super.net) at Tue Mar 14 23:40:17 CST 2000 said:
九巴未來一年會買什麼新車?

50353-1

Article 63:

回應:

[00]

九巴車長是怎分柴的??

eric ching (bching@hk.super.net) at Tue Mar 14 23:19:13 CST 2000 said:
請問九巴車長是怎分柴的??

50352-1

Article 64:

回應:

[00]

九巴現職車長會否改為月薪制?

eric ching (bching@hk.super.net) at Tue Mar 14 23:17:24 CST 2000 said:
九巴現職車長會否改為月薪制?

50350-1

Article 65:

回應:

[00]

'香港巴士迷互動網' 新增內容

T.W.C. (cityupdate@mail.mynvo.com) at Tue Mar 14 22:55:03 CST 2000 said:
'香港巴士迷互動網' 新增以下內容:

'巴士全方位' 分頁

- 巴士轉車站

- 天水圍路線發展

- 269D新線資料

'巴士迷投票站' 投票題目更新

今期題目: 你是否贊成當局設立巴士轉車站呢?

網址: http://go.to/busupdate

歡迎瀏覽

50349-1

Article 66:

回應:

[00]

恭喜恭喜！大量翻新DA投入新巴2A！

超奧再現720 (cotquean@netvigator.com) at Tue Mar 14 22:47:17 CST 2000 said:
最近不少翻新完成的DA行走2A，令該線形象有所提升！

車上的無間斷光管很醒目喔！

其實DA行2A好FIT，而且令我想起當年DL行走2A的景象...

相信新巴的翻新巴士計劃，進度會馬上加快，

因為33XXL的裝配工作巳經完成喇！

不過，我諗DA依然會優先被翻新，因為VA,LA翻新後要再過

傾斜測試，才可以訂立出一個翻新標準規格.....

50346-1

Article 67:

回應:

[00]

尋ML23,57,SF13,16和新巴15,15B號一問

紅磡之友(DE6127) (wong01@netteens.net) at Tue Mar 14 22:33:48 CST 2000 said:
ML57我們很久活見在柴灣路線

在43X都找不到,是不是行91A/95B

現在新巴15號一共有多數輛SF,33,和20系列

15B是不是全冷,有沒有用過33系列

50340-1

Article 68:

回應:

[00]

[報料] 發現一個會發聲的城巴上蓋...

細佬~郵差叔叔 (ausaiho@netvigator.com) at Tue Mar 14 21:10:44 CST 2000 said:
[報料] 我在德輔道中(渣X銀行總行對出/往上環方向)的城巴上蓋等巴士時, 聽見一些音樂從某廣告版發出, 而該廣告係講公積金(英國保X保險), 而個個正在候車乘客也被這些美妙的音樂吸引...

同時我發現對面的隧巴分站的舊中巴上蓋, 3 個舊上蓋, 經已拆掉 2 個啦, 昨天我仍見 3 個仍'健在', 今日已... 唉...

細佬~郵差叔叔

ICQ#64015472

50335-1

Article 69:

回應:

[00]

Model bus...

S3BL182~DR4014 (wendywon@asiaonline.net) at Tue Mar 14 20:37:24 CST 2000 said:
In Hong Kong,where can i buy this model bus?

thx

50330-1

Article 70:

回應:

[00]

相片，請評分

S3BL182~DR4014 (wendywon@asiaonline.net) at Tue Mar 14 20:02:04 CST 2000 said:

E 889 CDS, Leyland Lion LDTL11/1R with Alexander CH49/37F Bodywork. New as Clydeside 2000 160 in 12/1987 and one of five Lions acquired by Chester in 1994. Seen here in Chester Coaches livery. Previous registrations; VLT 166 5/1994, E 160 YGB 12/1992. The entire batch of Lions was sold to Nottingham City Transport in 8/1998.

50322-1

Article 71:

回應:

[00]

Why新記回覆話看不到我wrote的e-mail?

小丸子新巴開篷DM6 rt.15C (c8002953@net1.hkbu.edu.hk) at Tue Mar 14 19:00:39 CST 2000 said:
以下係新記reply我的e-mail:

Dear Mr Eric Tong,

Thank you for your email dated 11 March 2000 regarding the captioned.

We are sorry that we are unable to read the content of your email because

the font type is incompartible with the software we are using. We use

Netscape Communicator 4.03 ( chinese version) with Big Five code system.

We are pleased that if you can forward the email once again or fax your

valuable suggestion to our Customer Service Department at Customer Service

Hotfax 2136 2136.

Thank you very much for your kind attention.

Regards,

Christina Ning

Customer Services Manager

New World First Bus Services Limited

點解會咁?

JJ4786 rt.15C

50289-1

Article 72:

回應:

[00]

269D客量?

5C16bshl (rat@i-cable.com) at Tue Mar 14 13:42:39 CST 2000 said:
As title.Thanks.

50357-1

Article 73:

回應:

[01]

CTB 105 and 205 questions.

100/911R/M1/300/917 (wongj1@netvigator.com) at Wed Mar 15 00:17:57 CST 2000 said:
I have two questions regarding CTB 105 and 205:

1)Can anyone define as to what kind of body does

105 has now? Alexander? ECW? ECW with an Alexander

front?

2)Had 205 ever serve on any non-franchised route?

If so, which ones?

Thank you very much.

100/911R/M1/300/917 Wong

Article 73: (Request 1)

Alexander 頭, ECW 身.

50359-1

Article 74:

回應:

[00]

路線系列之 (甲)

Simon_2A (simon-clt@i-cable.com) at Wed Mar 15 00:41:02 CST 2000 said:
請問:

以車費/行車里數計 (機場巴士及馬場巴士不計)

1, 中記最扺搭的路線?

2, 中記最掠水的路線?

3, 九記最扺搭的路線?

4, 九記最掠水的路線?

5, 城記最扺搭的路線?

6, 城記最掠水的路線?

7, 新記最扺搭的路線?

8, 新記最掠水的路線?

50358-1

Article 75:

回應:

[00]

樣辦車系列之 (五) --- 中巴AV1

Simon_2A (simon-clt@i-cable.com) at Wed Mar 15 00:35:58 CST 2000 said:
中巴的AV系列相對於同期出道的MC,MB,LV,DS實在是比較短命, 可是樣辦車AV1卻比其他被BBQ的量產車幸運, 1975年落地, 至1991年才退役, 有15-16年車齡, 請問由它落地至退役之間:

1, 它行走過的路線?

2, 它在中記師傅和大偈心目中的印象(受歡迎嗎)?

3, 它經過什麼車身或機械改動?

50363-1

Article 76:

回應:

[00]

Sheung Tak SLF......

DM8070 (h9924434@hkusua.hku.hk) at Wed Mar 15 01:29:13 CST 2000 said:
Is it true that in Shueng Tak, only 893, N293, 693 and N96 hasn't used any Super Low Floor buses?

Thanks!

50362-1

Article 77:

回應:

[00]

[路線建議]277X{粉嶺(聯和墟)至奧運站}

LEMON (i-ray@i-cable.com) at Wed Mar 15 01:26:15 CST 2000 said:
粉嶺(聯和墟)開途經:和滿街,聯安街,和睦路,粉嶺樓路,沙頭角公路(龍躍頭段),新運路,粉嶺車站路,新運路,新豐路,寶運路,寶石湖路,粉嶺公路,新田公路,青朗公路,屯門公路,荃灣路,葵涌道,長沙灣道,彌敦道,旺角道,西洋菜南街,亞皆老街,櫻桃街及海景街.奧運站開途經:D2路,櫻桃街,大角咀道,未命名路,櫻桃街,亞皆老街,新填地街,旺角道,彌敦道,荔枝角道,黃竹街,長沙灣道,荔枝角道,葵涌道,荃灣路,屯門公路,青朗公路,新田公路,粉嶺公路,寶石湖路,寶運路,新豐路,龍琛路,龍運街,新運路,粉嶺車站路,沙頭角公路(龍躍頭段),粉嶺樓路,和睦路,和泰街及和滿街.

服務時間:

粉嶺(聯和墟)開:0615<---->2315

奧運站開:0615<---->0000

班次:8<---->20min

全程收費 $14.4

大欖隧道轉車站往奧運站:$12.5

美孚往奧運站:$5.0

彌敦道往奧運站:$4.2

大欖隧道轉車站往粉嶺(聯和墟):$10.2

上水(新豐路)往粉嶺(聯和墟):$4.7

於大欖隧道轉車站(憑九巴轉車優惠券)往奧運站:$3.5

於大欖隧道轉車站(憑九巴轉車優惠券)往粉嶺(聯和墟):$1.8

用車:11部AV,8部AD,7部AL

50366-1

Article 78:

回應:

[00]

Re: [問路]愛民往洪水橋?

3ADV46 (s986380@mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk) at Wed Mar 15 01:57:10 CST 2000 said:
> LEMON (i-ray@i-cable.com) said:

> 請問由愛民往洪水橋應該搭甚麼路線?

搭 18/紅 Van 出旺角或搭 8 出油麻地轉 63X

50365-1

Article 79:

回應:

[00]

(可能係)後現代寫實主義巴士照片分享

超奧再現720 (cotquean@netvigator.com) at Wed Mar 15 02:00:52 CST 2000 said:
小弟一向無乜好  益大家，

不過今次就準備左一批超另類、

帶有後現代寫實主義風格的巴士照片益大家，

希望與愛拍巴士之板友一同分享這份喜悅！(非看不可!!)

聲明：下列巴士照片與本人無關！

請速結到：

1)勵鬼 DA 40夜夜伴住你

http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/3391/da40.jpg

2)半人半鐵機械獸--無頭中巴AL

http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/speedway/3337/al2.jpg

3)飄飄欲仙,夢幻飛翔-來自仙界的SF

http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/3391/lfxxx.jpg

4)九巴雞雞半截情

http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/3360/g541-2.jpg

5)鬼域神雞--佢話係雞

http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/3360/gxxx.jpg

6)劫後餘生--三次大戰後的AL

http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/3360/alxxx.jpg

7)海市神樓--淒美的AL

http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/3360/alyyy.jpg

更多好相，由此路進

http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/3361/index2.htm

得罪得罪......