Today's Articles: 12.
Articles' Numbers: (19971211_01-13) No Article 12.
Article 1:
彩雲用唔用得 3- X
Dragon (kaho@netvigator.com) at Thu Dec 11 02:21, 1997 said:
早過輪, 睇到報紙有人建議 606 轉 11米車, 九記答覆因豐盛街轉清水灣道
之路面問題, 所以不能使用11米車. 問題:
(1) 但我見中記連 DL 12M 都行過 606, 而九記則話連 11 米都不可以, 點解呢?
究竟條路係咪真係唔夠轉呀?
(2) 而運輸署對每條線用車應有所規定隔, 如果有間巴士公司(聲明:並非淨指中記),
用了過長d 車而出事的話 (Sorry ! touch wood!), 佢會有甚麼後果? 乘客又有何保障?
Article 2:
Why KMB does not cancel route #87?
Eric Choi (ericchoi@aicom.com) at Thu Dec 11 05:44, 1997 said:
I feel suprise that route #87 still exists.
During 1989-1996, I studied in one secondary school in Lek
Yuen. I saw route #87 was changed from 'D' to 'G'. The service
frequency is 25-40 mins, isn't it? But I never saw more
than 10 people waiting for the bus in the terminus. Tai Wai
customers can be served by route #80K, #88K and #85. Shem
Shui Po customers can be served by route #72, #81 and #86.
Shek Kip Mei customers can be served by route #86.
Mongkok customers can be served by route #72 and #81. And
Tai Kok Tsui customers can be served by route #72. #87 repeats
the above routes. It's better to cancel it. I remember that
in about 1988, KMB said that route #87 was one of the most serious
loss routes. Route #6E, #54, #73K,#74K,#78K and #79k were included,
too. But some of them have made some adjustments. If KMB
want to canael route #87, KMB can offer the section fare on
route #72 from Wo Che to Tai Kok Tsui.
Do you agree KMB cancel route #87 and offer section fare on
route #72, from Wo Che to Tai Kok Tsui?
Article 2: (Request 1)
> Yes, Rt.87 should be cancelled and a section fare should be
> added on Rt.72. I don't know why there is a section fare for
> Rt.86 (Wo Che to Mei Foo) but Rt.72 neither. Maybe it's due
> to the policy of KMB which sets the fare of rural routes higher
> while the fare of local routes lower so that the rural routes
> will not compete with the local routes. However, the poor
> situation of Rt.87 reflects that KMB should utilize their
> resources properly, i.e. improve the service of Rt.72 (use G
> is acceptable) and cancel Rt.87. I think no passengers will
> blame there will be no bus going to Sham Shui Po via Lion
> Rock Tunnel and Nam Cheong Street.
從區議會得知，九巴近年曾提出
將280P及87合併為87
穗禾苑←→九龍車站
遭區議會反對
其實，九記在八十年代末期已有意取消87
又是遭區議員「挫住地球轉的人」反對
不過，我覺得九記應重整87，如下：
沙田火車站←→大角咀
經源禾路、沙田第一城、小瀝源、廣源、大隧、鐨石山、彩虹道
、太子道東、亞皆老街
STANLEY YUNG
Article 3:
八達通
Wayne Lam (waynelam@aicom.com) at Thu Dec 11 12:30, 1997 said:
Does anyone know which buses have 八達通machine? Do all buses of KMB and CTB have those machines?
Article 4;
問板友有關 網頁廣告
Ken Fung (kenf@hkstar.com) at Thu Dec 11 11:33, 1997 said:
想請問聲各位對 網頁廣告 有何意見? 太多/少? 廣告內容太少/多?
有用/冇用?
本人自己就覺得有時廣告既內容實在太少, 加一張相又出廣告, 少少
改動又出廣告, 少少預告又出廣告...... 令到我而家大多都 skip
哂 D 廣告唔睇... 雖然我唔反對 網頁廣告, 但都希望廣告內容係
比較 '大件事' 少少丫. 如: 加相唔止兩三張, 更改網址 等.
歡迎提出意見.
Ken
Article 5:
Re: ME1 .......將退役？
y k shum (ykshum@mit.edu) at Thu Dec 11 12:28, 1997 said:
BENZ 迷 (n281@hkstar.com) said:
> 傳聞！！
>
> ME1 已失蹤，好似停在荔廠頂．
> 傳聞數輛 BENZ 將退役
>
> BENZ 迷 上
Actually, it has been 14 yrs since KMB introduced ME1.
Consider the fact that this bus is listed as a 3-axle class
in driver's pay scale, and the availability of
parts, etc, it is quite possible KMB will retire it before its COF.
I hope KMB will repaint it in its original form and preserve it.
y k
Article 6:
Re: ME1 .......將退役？
Spike Wu.(2001) (abspike@school.net.hk) at Thu Dec 11 12:30, 1997 said:
BENZ 迷 (n281@hkstar.com) said:
> 傳聞！！
>
> ME1 已失蹤，好似停在荔廠頂．
> 傳聞數輛 BENZ 將退役
>
> BENZ 迷 上
前排仲o係天水圍廠見到佢果o番,見到佢油左細logo,個樣仲幾
精神格.咁快又湯!?
Spike Wu.(2001)
Article 7:
今日所見（十二月十一日）
小我老師 (klaleung@hkstar.com) at Thu Dec 11 10:16, 1997 said:
01. 連續兩日見到MB28...... 唔係，係ME28（九龍悅來客棧）行73x，
唔通掛o左牌？
Article 8:
加相通告.......
一個好人 (cummins@netvigator.com) at Thu Dec 11 06:07, 1997 said:
又加左相喇...
快D去睇啦!!!
http://members.hknet.com/~cummins
另外加左投票站,
但係好友ONLY !!!
Article 8: (Request 1)
My thanks to 'good man' who provides us a chance to see such
an exciting picture. Anyone can say more about this huge recovery
truck, BL xxxx. It is the first time I heard or saw it.
My description: 'Ying - in Cantonese'
y k
Article 9:
【網頁通告】China City Bus Page
T.P.T. (cmb970@technologist.com) at Wed Dec 10 22:15, 1997 said:
小弟之網頁作出新編排...
因我近排都唔係好得閒,所以暫時不會再加相住,直至另行通告.
由於我今晚唔夠時間UPLOADo的File上去,所以有好多相係睇唔倒o既.
我聽日會UPLOAD埋o的Flie上去.
China City Bus Page
T.P.T.
Article 10:
壹問題
Citybus 12M (h9402461@hkusua.hku.hk) at Wed Dec 10 22:07, 1997 said:
1.龍運Trident時間表
Article 11:
Re: 豈有此理!! (8達通版)
AD302 (c5124176@comp.polyu.edu.hk) at Wed Dec 10 21:08, 1997 said:
安迪安 (h9703053@hkusua.hku.hk) said:
> 琴晚我o向金鍾返港大, 由於我唔夠散銀, 所以走去香港公園個站等
> 103, 因為可以用八達通咭.(雖然103要$5.4, 比較貴)
>
> 行餐矇去到個站, 冒住寒冷o既天氣, 企o向度等呀等, 等了又等, 好
> 耐都冇103, 只有好多部23,40,40M 經過, 但我都唔上, 係都要等到103為
> 止.
>
> 大約20分鐘后, 終於有103 (HL 牌 AV) o黎啦!! (我差唔多變雪條)
> 點知一上車, 見到錢箱側面寫住 : [本車未裝八達通機, 請自備輔幣]
> 我無可奈何入6蚊. 豈有此理, 等幾個字, 竟然O黎部冇得用八達通O既車.
>
> 這次已經唔係第一次, 早幾個星期我都搭過一次103, 又係冇八達通用.
> (上次係城記, 今次係九記!) 唔知係咪我黑仔, 兩次搭103都係咁. 但係
> 平日見親Ｄ103都有八達通, 但坐親都冇, 真係激死!!
講起上來, 九記所有3AD都冇發達窿, 搞到次次試新車都要 ' 請惠現
金 ' .
今晚坐3AD由學校番屋企o既輝仔
Article 11: (request 1)
咁仲未算慶，當你見架架40同40M都有八達通機，但係o黎架103時
架9xx竟然無就仲激氣！
(171又係咁，90B有機佢竟然無！)
Article 13:
不再後備!
AD302 (c5124176@comp.polyu.edu.hk) at Wed Dec 10 20:42, 1997 said:
上星期見3AD1 行101, 今日中午又見佢行101, 是不是和3AV1 一樣
已成為101 掛牌呢?
輝仔(Fans of Dragon)
6C掛牌HB2220/AD302
